REVIEW 2 cited by
Relativistic effects in the strong and electromagnetic decays of ${D^*}$ meson
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, we solve the complete Salpeter equation and use the obtained relativistic wave function to calculate the strong and radiative electromagnetic decays of the ${D^*}$ meson. { We obtain the results $\Gamma(D^{*}(2007)^{0}\to D^{0}\pi^{0})=34.6~\rm{keV}$ and $\Gamma(D^{*}(2007)^{0}\rightarrow D^{0}\gamma)=19.4~\rm{keV}$, and the estimated full width is $\Gamma(D^{*}(2007)^{0})=54.0~\rm{keV}$.} The focus of this study is on the relativistic corrections. In our method, the wave function of the $D$ meson is not a pure $S$-wave, but includes both a non-relativistic $S$-wave and a relativistic $P$-wave, while the wave function of the $D^*$ meson includes a non-relativistic $S$-wave as well as both relativistic $P$-wave and $D$-wave. Therefore, in this case, the decay ${D^{*}\rightarrow{D}\gamma}$ is not a non-relativistic $M1$ transition, but rather an $M1+E2+M3+E4$ decay. We find that in a strong decay $D^{*}\rightarrow{D}{\pi}$, the non-relativistic contribution is dominant, while in an electromagnetic decay ${D^{*}\rightarrow{D}\gamma}$, the relativistic correction is dominant.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Relativistic effects in $\mbox{M1}$ radiative decays of heavy-light mesons
A relativistic potential model, with all parameters taken from meson masses, predicts M1 radiative widths for D and D_s mesons and gives a B_s hyperfine splitting close to the new CMS measurement.
-
Systematic study of light and charm meson M1 radiative transitions
The paper calculates vector meson magnetic moments and M1 radiative decay widths for light and charm mesons, finding that both models need empirical scale factors to match measured charm decays.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.