Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 60 references

Comments on firewalls in JT gravity with matter

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The gray hole conjecture in JT gravity follows from a Wilsonian twist-factor cutoff: black and white hole probabilities saturate to 1/2 after the Heisenberg time and sum to one at all times.

desk verdict A clean geometric repackaging of the known gray-hole probabilities in JT gravity via a twist-factor cutoff; worth refereeing, but the central formula is already in [31] and the self-averaging/matter-loop claims are real but thinner than advertised. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11012 v2 pith:WC6YLKIG submitted 2024-12-15 hep-th

Chuanxin Cui , Moshe Rozali This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords JTgravitygrayholeconjecturefirewallprobabilitywormholeshorteningFZZTbranestwistfactorcutoffmatrixintegralHeisenbergtime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish the gray hole conjecture in JT gravity—the claim that a sufficiently old black hole is equally likely to be found in a black hole or a white hole state—from a geometric picture rather than from the matrix integral alone. The authors argue that non-perturbative effects can be encoded in an effective twist factor cutoff: small baby universes are traded through wormholes with a twist equal to their size, while large baby universes end on FZZT branes and contribute only a constant twist. Feeding this cutoff into the handle-disk two-point function, and treating emission and absorption of baby universes symmetrically, gives the probabilities $P_{\mathrm{BH}}(T)=1-T/T_H+T^2/(2T_H^2)$ and $P_{\mathrm{WH}}(T)=T/T_H-T^2/(2T_H^2)$ before the Heisenberg time, saturating to $1/2$ for $T\ge T_H$. This reproduces the matrix-integral result while keeping the wormhole-shortening geometry intact. The same effective description implies that matter-loop corrections to the firewall probability are subdominant at late times and that the probabilities are self-averaging for a single typical member of the ensemble.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective twist factor with cutoff, $s(b)=\min\{b,4\pi\sqrt{E}\rho_0(E)\}$, which replaces the unbounded gluing twist in the handle-disk sum. It is derived from a partially fixed matrix ensemble: the slow modes in a narrow microcanonical window are kept as FZZT branes (gravitational boundaries where JT universes can end), while the fast modes outside the window are integrated out to generate the usual genus expansion. The second piece is the time-reversal symmetric treatment of the Euclidean handle-disk, which after analytic continuation admits both baby-universe emission, $T_{\mathrm{eff}}=T-b/(2\sqrt{E})$, and absorption, $T_{\mathrm{eff}}=T+b/(2\sqrt{E})$; this symmetry is what guarantees the black and white hole probabilities add to one.

What would settle it

Simulate a single large GUE matrix, prepare a microcanonical two-sided state at high energy, evolve it past the Heisenberg time, and measure the fraction of final Cauchy slices with negative effective time; the paper predicts exactly $1/2$, so any systematic deviation would falsify the self-averaging gray hole claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, the central claim is that the full non-perturbative late-time behavior of JT gravity, including the firewall probability, is captured by replacing the twist factor $s$ in the genus expansion with the cutoff $s(b)=\min\{b,4\pi\sqrt{E}\rho_0(E)\}$, where $b$ is the baby-universe length, $E$ the microcanonical energy, and $\rho_0(E)$ the disk density of states. The cutoff arises from treating the eigenvalues inside a microcanonical window as FZZT branes—boundary conditions where JT universes can end—while integrating out the remaining fast eigenvalues. Used in the handle-disk two-point function, with both the emitting branch $T_{\mathrm{eff}}=T-b/(2\sqrt{E})$ and the absorbing branch $T_{\mathrm{eff}}=T+b/(2\sqrt{E})$ kept, this gives the probabilities in Eq. (4.14), which saturate to $1/2$ after the Heisenberg time and sum to one, matching the non-perturbative matrix-integral answer.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the divergent constant left by the unconstrained T-transformation is strictly time-independent, so it can be removed by requiring $P_{\mathrm{WH}}(T=0)=0$; if any time dependence survived, the two probabilities would no longer sum to one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • After the Heisenberg time the white hole probability saturates exactly to $1/2$ and stays there, not merely approaches it.
  • The black and white hole probabilities sum to unity at all times, resolving the normalization difficulty of the earlier wormhole-shortening derivation.
  • The same two topologies (disk plus handle-disk with cutoff) reproduce the full matrix-integral answer; no summation over higher genera is needed.
  • The firewall probability is self-averaging: a single typical draw from the ensemble gives the same answer as the averaged one.
  • Matter-loop firewalls are subdominant, suppressed by $O(1/T)$ before the Heisenberg time and by $O(1/T_H)$ after it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cutoff may be a universal footprint of level repulsion: in any chaotic system whose late-time correlators exhibit a ramp-plateau, the conjugate variable to the plateau time should saturate at the inverse level spacing, so the same $\min\{b,1/\delta\}$ structure could appear outside JT gravity.
  • As the microcanonical window shrinks to a few eigenvalues, the geometric genus expansion should break down in a tearing transition; the paper flags this as an open problem, and one testable prediction is that the firewall probabilities deviate from the universal curve precisely there.
  • If matter loops really are suppressed at late times, then the firewall question is governed almost entirely by the twist-factor cutoff, making the firewall probability a cleaner probe of non-perturbative spectral correlations than of bulk matter dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'Wilsonian' effective description of JT gravity in which the dual double-scaled matrix integral is averaged in stages: eigenvalues outside a fixed microcanonical window ('fast modes') are integrated out to produce the gravitational genus expansion, while the eigenvalues inside the window ('slow modes') are represented as FZZT eigenbranes on which JT universes can end (Sec. 3). The central output is a twist-factor cutoff prescription: in handle-disk contributions to late-time correlators, the twist factor s for a baby universe of size b is replaced by min{b, 4π√E ρ0(E)} (Eq. 3.16), with the saturated value interpreted geometrically as the baby universe ending on a D-brane. The prescription is applied (Sec. 4) to the two-point function on the handle-disk, with the bulk moduli left unconstrained by the mapping class group and emission/absorption of baby universes treated time-reversal symmetrically. The result is the gray-hole probabilities PBH(T) = 1 − T/TH + T²/(2TH²) and PWH(T) = T/TH − T²/(2TH²) for T < TH, and PBH = PWH = 1/2 for T ≥ TH (Eq. 4.14), matching the matrix-integral computation of [31]. A formally divergent constant appearing identically in both probabilities (Eq. 4.9) is removed by imposing PWH(0) = 0 (footnote 9). The paper further argues that matter loops on the b2 cycle of the handle-disk are sub-dominant firewall sources, suppressed by O(1/T) before the plateau and O(1/TH) after (Sec.

Significance. If the construction is sound, the paper is a useful unification: the twist-factor cutoff gives a single geometric language that reproduces the probabilities of [31], resolves two open issues from [29] (saturation of PWH at 1/2 after the Heisenberg time and normalization PBH + PWH = 1 at all times), and extends the discussion to matter loops and to individual members of the ensemble. Strengths to credit: the final formula (4.14) is parameter-free, with the only divergent constant fixed by the physical condition PWH(T=0)=0 rather than fitted to the target answer; the self-averaging claim is checked numerically (Fig. 12, with explicit GUE data up to L = 16000 and 200 samples) rather than merely asserted; and the paper is candid about the logical status of its inputs, stating that the agreement with [31] is 'not surprising' because the cutoff encodes nonperturbative RMT information (Eq. 3.18).

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Eqs. (4.8)–(4.13), footnote 9] The regularization of the divergent constant is the load-bearing step of the central derivation, and as written it is asserted rather than demonstrated. Both PWH and PBH are extracted from integrals over Teff with semi-infinite ranges (Eqs. 4.8 and 4.12), and both contain the same formally divergent constant, Eq. (4.9), which is removed by imposing PWH(T=0)=0. The paper attributes the divergence to overcounting under the unconstrained T-transformation ℓ → ℓ + nb and asserts (footnote 9) that the divergence is independent of T. Since b = 2√E|T − Teff| in Eq. (4.7), the image spacing of that transformation depends on T, so the T-independence is not automatic; because PBH + PWH = 1 and the plateau value 1/2 rely on the constant being exactly T-independent and identical in the two probabilities, a concrete check is needed. I verified that a symmetric hard cutoff on Teff (|Teff| ≤ Λ) is consistent: the T-dependent finite parts sit in the polynomial terms, the same constant −1/2 + Λ/TH appears in both PWH and PBH, and imposing PWH(0)=0 (i.e., Λ = TH/2) reproduces Eq. (4.14); however, this check is not shown in the manuscript, and an asymmetric regulator would in general produce different constants for the two probabilities. Please include an explicit regulator or a fundamental-domain computation and state the conditions under which the constant is T-independent and shared. Note also that the orientation of the divergent integral in Eq. (4.9) (∫₀^{−∞} dTeff) conflicts in sign with what the algebra of Eqs. (4.8) and (4.10) requires; as printed it is a sign error, even if the intended meaning is clear.
  2. [§3.3–3.4, Eq. (3.16); §1 and end of §4.2] The paper should state more precisely what is derived and what is imported. The twist-factor cutoff (3.16) is obtained by inserting the random-matrix sine-kernel result (3.18) into the connected two-point function of baby-universe operators (3.13)–(3.14), so the agreement with [31] follows in large part by construction, as the authors acknowledge at the end of Sec. 4.2. This is not itself a defect, but the abstract's phrase 'applying uniformly to all probes of the firewall probability previously discussed' (Sec. 1) is stronger than what is demonstrated, since Sec. 4 computes the two-point function only. Please either show explicitly that the other probes used previously (e.g., those of [29]) reduce to the same s(b) integral structure, or qualify the uniformity claim as a conjecture. Relatedly, the statement in Sec. 4.3 that 'higher topologies are never important in our treatment' should be presented as a property of the effective prescription rather than as a derived fact, since the equivalence of the cutoff resummation with the full genus expansion (cf. [54]) is checked in this paper only for the quantities computed in Sec. 4.
  3. [§5.2 and Appendix B] The advertised second result, that matter-loop firewalls are sub-dominant, is presented as a qualitative argument, and the paper itself flags the two weakest points: the effective OTOC contour relies on a twist mode that 'is not manifest' in the chosen representation (footnote 12), and the firewall moduli region 'would be interesting to make more precise' (footnote 13). As written, the O(1/T) suppression estimate rests on the exponential localization of the b1 twist mode once the b2 matter loop is present, but no quantitative estimate of the one-loop determinant on the b2 circle (beyond the saddle value b2 = arccosh(9) in Eq. (B.18)) is supplied. Please provide an estimate or a bound for the twist-mode localization contribution to the one-loop determinant, or state explicitly that the O(1/T) and O(1/TH) suppression statements are conjectures. This does not affect the validity of the Sec. 4 result, but it determines the strength of the claim as summarized in the abstract and in Sec. 6.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'However we modifies Saad's story' is ungrammatical and should be rephrased.
  2. [§3.2, footnote 5] Footnote 5 breaks off mid-sentence ('...averaging over L and L − n eigenvalues in non-perturbative'); the sentence should be completed.
  3. [Fig. 12 caption] The caption refers to a 'GUM matrix'; this should be 'GUE matrix', and the axes should be labeled with units (e.g., b and T in units of the inverse level spacing) so that the comparison with the continuum results is quantitative.
  4. [§2.3] The cross-reference 'Fig.2.3' should read 'Fig. 3'.
  5. [Eq. (2.21)] The ERB length is denoted V(t) in Eq. (2.21) but ℓ elsewhere in the paper; please unify the notation.
  6. [§5.1, Eq. (5.2)] In Eq. (5.2), the estimate b1 = 2√E(T − Teff) = 2√ET − ln 4E implicitly uses the ℓ = 0 saddle (Teff = ln 4E/(2√E)); stating this explicitly would make the estimate easier to follow.
  7. [§5.2] The phrase 'a OTOC contour' should read 'an OTOC contour'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the twist-factor cutoff is derived from an external RMT connected correlator, and the final probabilities match [31] as a consistency check rather than being fitted to it.

full rationale

The claimed derivation is not circular. The key input, Eq. (3.18), is the standard GUE connected two-point function from random matrix theory, an external parameter-free result that is not derived from firewall probabilities. Eq. (3.16) uses it to construct the twist-factor cutoff s(b)=min{b,4π√Eρ0(E)}, and Sec. 4 evaluates integrals over this cutoff; no parameter is fitted to the target probabilities PBH/PWH. The divergent constant in Eqs. (4.8)-(4.13) is removed by the physical boundary condition PWH(T=0)=0, which is a definitional/renormalization condition, not a fit to the predicted late-time curve; the T-dependent shape and the 1/2 plateau follow from the explicitly computed integrals. The paper's remark that agreement with [31] is 'not surprising' transparently acknowledges that the nonperturbative information is encoded in the same RMT input; this is an external benchmark, not a self-citation chain. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems appear. The only genuine concern is the unregulated overcounting constant in footnote 9, which is a regularization/correctness risk rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the JT/matrix-integral duality, standard RMT correlators, a semiclassical wavefunction approximation, a hand-regularized over-counting constant, and the Wilsonian eigenvalue-brane interpretation. One hand-chosen normalization (const=0) is used. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Normalization constant const in Eq. (4.9) = 0 (imposed by PWH(T=0)=0)
    The divergent constant from mapping class group over-counting is removed by hand, following [31]. This choice is load-bearing because it fixes the sum PBH+PWH=1; a different constant would change the final probabilities.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption JT gravity is dual to a double-scaled random matrix integral (Sec. 3.1).
    The entire FZZT-brane and twist factor cutoff construction assumes this duality and the genus expansion (3.1).
  • standard math The connected density-density correlator of random matrix theory, Eq. (3.18), applies to the microcanonical window.
    Used to derive the twist factor cutoff (3.16); this is the sine kernel from RMT, cited to [51,52].
  • domain assumption The semiclassical saddle-point approximation of ψ_{E+ω/2}(ℓ)ψ_{E-ω/2}(ℓ) (Appendix A, Eq. A.9) is valid uniformly over the integration regions, including Teff near 0.
    The probability integrals in Sec. 4 extend over Teff in (-∞,∞); the approximation includes a Θ(log E+ℓ) factor and large-E expansion whose uniform validity is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The over-counting divergence from the unconstrained T-transformation is independent of T and can be regularized by PWH(T=0)=0 (Eq. 4.9 and footnote 9).
    The paper argues the divergence is an infinite over-counting from ℓ→ℓ+nb, but does not prove T-independence; this is a hand-inserted regularization.
  • domain assumption Fixing n eigenvalues and representing them as FZZT branes gives a valid effective Wilsonian description (Sec. 3.2-3.4).
    The equivalence (3.7) and the physical interpretation of n eigenvalues in a microcanonical window as D-branes underpin the cutoff prescription.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comments on firewalls in JT gravity with matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WC6YLKIG

@misc{pith2026241211012,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comments on firewalls in JT gravity with matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WC6YLKIG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11012}
}
read the original abstract

We present two discussions of firewalls in JT gravity. First we present an alternative, arguably simpler, derivation of the gray hole conjecture, applying uniformly to all probes of the firewall probability previously discussed. This derivation is based on the wormhole shortening picture using the handle-disk geometry. However we modifies Saad's story utilizing a "Wilsonian" effective gravitational description, adapted to the time scale probed, in which high frequency modes are integrated out generating the gravitational bulk geometries (dual to the genus expansion in the matrix integral side) whereas low frequency modes are more precisely resolved by being represented as eigenvalue D-branes where JT universes can end. This treatment results in an effective "twist factor cutoff" prescription which simplifies the discussion of long time quantities including the firewall probability. In the second part we discuss effects of matter loops on the firewall probability. While such effects lead to new firewall sources, we argue that these matter loop contributions are sub-dominant at late times.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Blommaert, C.-H

    A. Blommaert, C.-H. Chen and Y. Nomura, Firewalls at exponentially late times , 2403.07049

    arXiv

  2. [29]

    Stanford and Z

    D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Firewalls from wormholes , 2208.01625. – 39 –

    arXiv

  3. [54]

    P. Saad, D. Stanford, Z. Yang and S. Yao, A convergent genus expansion for the plateau , JHEP 09 (2024) 033 [ 2210.11565]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun

    S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199

    1975

  5. [2]

    Hawking, Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse , Phys

    S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460

    1976

  6. [3]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S.H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 [ hep-th/9610043]

    arXiv 1997

  7. [4]

    Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [5]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [ hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 60 references
  1. [6]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? , JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [ 1207.3123]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An Apologia for Firewalls , JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [ 1304.6483]. – 38 –

    2013 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Bousso, Complementarity Is Not Enough , Phys

    R. Bousso, Complementarity Is Not Enough , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 124023 [ 1207.5192]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Nomura, J

    Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg, Complementarity Endures: No Firewall for an Infalling Observer , JHEP 03 (2013) 059 [ 1207.6626]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes , Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [1306.0533]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Van Raamsdonk, Evaporating Firewalls, JHEP 11 (2014) 038 [ 1307.1796]

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Evaporating Firewalls, JHEP 11 (2014) 038 [ 1307.1796]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Almheiri, X

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [ 1411.7041]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [14]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [ 1601.05416]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149 [ 1908.10996]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Penington, S.H

    G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, JHEP 03 (2022) 205 [ 1911.11977]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation , JHEP 05 (2020) 013 [ 1911.12333]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole , JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [ 1905.08762]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [ 1905.08255]

    G. Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [ 1905.08255]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Susskind, ER=EPR, GHZ, and the consistency of quantum measurements , Fortsch

    L. Susskind, ER=EPR, GHZ, and the consistency of quantum measurements , Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 72 [ 1412.8483]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [21]

    Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter , JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [ hep-th/0106112]

    J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter , JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [ hep-th/0106112]

    2003 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Shenker and D

    S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect , JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [1306.0622]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Cotler, G

    J.S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S.H. Shenker et al., Black Holes and Random Matrices , JHEP 05 (2017) 118 [ 1611.04650]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Saad, S.H

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral , 1903.11115

    1903 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Saad, S.H

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity , 1806.06840

    arXiv

  21. [26]

    Saad, Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity , 1910.10311

    P. Saad, Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity , 1910.10311

    1910 arXiv

  22. [27]

    Blommaert, T.G

    A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity, JHEP 09 (2019) 060 [ 1902.11194]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Yan, Crosscap contribution to late-time two-point correlators , JHEP 12 (2023) 051 [2203.14436]

    C. Yan, Crosscap contribution to late-time two-point correlators , JHEP 12 (2023) 051 [2203.14436]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Susskind, The Typical-State Paradox: Diagnosing Horizons with Complexity , Fortsch

    L. Susskind, The Typical-State Paradox: Diagnosing Horizons with Complexity , Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 84 [ 1507.02287]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Iliesiu, A

    L.V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, H.W. Lin, H. Maxfield and M. Mezei, On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity , JHEP 10 (2024) 220 [ 2403.08696]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Miyaji, Discrete Spectrum of Interior Length and Timeshift in Two-sided Black Hole , 2410.20662

    M. Miyaji, Discrete Spectrum of Interior Length and Timeshift in Two-sided Black Hole , 2410.20662

    arXiv

  27. [34]

    S´ arosi,AdS2 holography and the SYK model , PoS Modave2017 (2018) 001 [ 1711.08482]

    G. S´ arosi,AdS2 holography and the SYK model , PoS Modave2017 (2018) 001 [ 1711.08482]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Trunin, Pedagogical introduction to the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model and two-dimensional dilaton gravity, Usp

    D.A. Trunin, Pedagogical introduction to the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model and two-dimensional dilaton gravity, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 191 (2021) 225 [ 2002.12187]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Mertens and G.J

    T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci, Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 4 [ 2210.10846]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Jafferis, D.K

    D.L. Jafferis, D.K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov and J. Sonner, Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 066015 [ 2209.02131]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Goel, L.V

    A. Goel, L.V. Iliesiu, J. Kruthoff and Z. Yang, Classifying boundary conditions in JT gravity: from energy-branes to α-branes, JHEP 04 (2021) 069 [ 2010.12592]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory , JHEP 10 (2017) 008 [1703.04612]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Yang, The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes , JHEP 05 (2019) 205 [1809.08647]

    Z. Yang, The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes , JHEP 05 (2019) 205 [1809.08647]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Harlow and D

    D. Harlow and D. Jafferis, The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity , JHEP 02 (2020) 177 [ 1804.01081]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Blommaert, T.G

    A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde, Eigenbranes in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, JHEP 02 (2021) 168 [ 1911.11603]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [43]

    B. Post, J. van der Heijden and E. Verlinde, A universe field theory for JT gravity , JHEP 05 (2022) 118 [ 2201.08859]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Altland, B

    A. Altland, B. Post, J. Sonner, J. van der Heijden and E.P. Verlinde, Quantum chaos in 2D gravity, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 064 [ 2204.07583]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Dijkgraaf and C

    R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa, Matrix models, topological strings, and supersymmetric gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 644 (2002) 3 [ hep-th/0206255]

    2002 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Dijkgraaf and C

    R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa, On geometry and matrix models , Nucl. Phys. B 644 (2002) 21 [hep-th/0207106]

    2002 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Blommaert, L.V

    A. Blommaert, L.V. Iliesiu and J. Kruthoff, Gravity factorized, JHEP 09 (2022) 080 [2111.07863]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Blommaert, Dissecting the ensemble in JT gravity , JHEP 09 (2022) 075 [ 2006.13971]

    A. Blommaert, Dissecting the ensemble in JT gravity , JHEP 09 (2022) 075 [ 2006.13971]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Saad, S.H

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and S. Yao, Wormholes without averaging , JHEP 09 (2024) 133 [2103.16754]. – 40 –

    2024 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Saad, S.H

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and S. Yao, Comments on wormholes and factorization , JHEP 10 (2024) 076 [2107.13130]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos , Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Berlin (2010), 10.1007/978-3-642-05428-0

    F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos , Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Berlin (2010), 10.1007/978-3-642-05428-0

    2010 doi

  45. [52]

    Mehta, Random Matrices, 3rd ed

    M.L. Mehta, Random Matrices, 3rd ed. (2004)

    2004

  46. [53]

    Zolfi, Firewalls from wormholes in higher genus , JHEP 05 (2024) 039 [ 2401.04476]

    H. Zolfi, Firewalls from wormholes in higher genus , JHEP 05 (2024) 039 [ 2401.04476]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Stanford, Z

    D. Stanford, Z. Yang and S. Yao, Subleading Weingartens, JHEP 02 (2022) 200 [ 2107.10252]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Gao and L

    P. Gao and L. Lamprou, Seeing behind black hole horizons in SYK , JHEP 06 (2022) 143 [2111.14010]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    de Boer, D.L

    J. de Boer, D.L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou, On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time , 2211.16512

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Blommaert and J

    A. Blommaert and J. Kruthoff, Gravity without averaging , SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 073 [2107.02178]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kazakov, A Simple Solvable Model of Quantum Field Theory of Open Strings , Phys

    V.A. Kazakov, A Simple Solvable Model of Quantum Field Theory of Open Strings , Phys. Lett. B 237 (1990) 212

    1990

  52. [60]

    Buser, Geometry and spectra of compact riemann surfaces ,

    P. Buser, Geometry and spectra of compact riemann surfaces , . – 41 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.