Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Electromagnetic Interactions of Massive Higher-Spin Fields in 3D via Chiral Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a consistent electromagnetic coupling for massive higher-spin fields in three dimensions, with gyromagnetic ratio g=1/s, obtained by dimensional reduction from chiral higher-spin theory.

desk verdict A genuinely new dimensional-reduction route to electromagnetic couplings for massive higher spins in 3D, but the headline g=1/s is not actually established: Eq. (3.12) is asserted, and an s=1 check gives a different coefficient. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11052 v1 pith:BVFY65BI submitted 2024-12-15 hep-th

Alexey Sharapov , David Shcherbatov , Evgeny Skvortsov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords massivehigher-spinfieldselectromagneticinteractiongyromagneticratiochiraltheoryself-dualYang-MillsBogomolnyequationdimensionalreductionthree-dimensionalfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a consistent way to couple massive higher-spin fields to an electromagnetic background in three-dimensional Minkowski space, a problem known to run into causality and consistency obstructions in higher dimensions. The construction starts from first-order chiral equations built from a square-root operator $W$ and requires the background to satisfy the Bogomolny equation, a square root of Maxwell's equations. The paper shows that the coupled system has exactly two physical degrees of freedom per point, and that the second-order form of the matter equation carries a magnetic coupling with gyromagnetic ratio $g=1/s$. It also shows that the same equations and a new free Lagrangian follow from dimensionally reducing a higher-spin extension of self-dual Yang-Mills theory in four dimensions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the first-order operator $W\Phi_{\mu_1\cdots\mu_s} = \sum_k \varepsilon_{\mu_k}{}^{\lambda\nu}\partial_\lambda \Phi_{\mu_1\cdots \nu \cdots \mu_s}$, a Pauli-Lubanski pseudoscalar that acts as a square root of the three-dimensional d'Alembertian: $W^2 = -s^2 \Box$ on divergence-free symmetric traceless tensors. The paper promotes this to a $U(1)$-covariant operator $W_A$ by replacing partial derivatives with $D_\mu = \partial_\mu + ie A_\mu$, and uses the Bogomolny equation $W A_\mu = \partial_\mu \phi$ as the background condition that preserves the gauge identities. The degree-of-freedom count is carried by the general involutive-system formula (2.4), and the descent from four dimensions uses the higher-spin extension of the self-dual Yang-Mills action in spinor form.

What would settle it

Take a specific non-constant solution $A_\mu$ of the source-free Maxwell equations in three dimensions, form $\phi$ through the integral expression (3.11), and compute $W_A^2$ on a symmetric traceless transverse rank-two tensor. If the result is not $-s^2 D^2$ plus exactly the commutator term that yields the $1/s$ magnetic coupling, then equation (3.12) and the gyromagnetic-ratio claim fail for that background.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the system $W_A \Phi_{\mu(s)} = s(m+ie\phi)\Phi_{\mu(s)}$ together with the transversality condition $D^\nu \Phi_{\nu\mu(s-1)}=0$ is consistent whenever the background fields $(A_\mu,\phi)$ satisfy the Bogomolny equation $W A_\mu = \partial_\mu \phi$. This system possesses $2s-1$ gauge identities of order two, so the counting formula (2.4) gives two physical degrees of freedom per spacetime point. Applying the operator $W_A$ to the matter equation yields the second-order equation $D^2 \Phi_{\mu(s)} + M^2 \Phi_{\mu(s)} - (ie/s) F_{\lambda\mu}\Phi^{\lambda}{}_{\mu(s-1)}=0$, from which the paper reads the gyromagnetic ratio $g=1/s$. The paper further claims that these equations and Lagrangians are exactly what one obtains by circle compactification of the higher-spin extension of self-dual Yang-Mills theory, which is itself a truncation of chiral higher-spin gravity in four dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $U(1)$-covariant square-root identity $W_A^2 = -s^2 D^2 + \cdots$ holds on divergence-free symmetric traceless tensors with exactly the commutator terms that produce the $1/s$ coefficient, a fact the paper does not prove and whose failure would change the gyromagnetic-ratio and consistency claims.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A charged massive spin-$s$ particle in three dimensions can propagate on a Maxwell or Bogomolny background without changing its number of physical degrees of freedom.
  • The interaction is non-minimal with gyromagnetic ratio $g=1/s$, and the second-order equation puts the ray cone on the light cone, so propagation is causal.
  • The same equations and Lagrangians descend from the higher-spin extension of self-dual Yang-Mills theory by circle compactification, giving interactions that are complete at all orders rather than requiring an infinite series of higher-order corrections.
  • A new Lagrangian for free massive higher-spin fields in three dimensions is obtained as a by-product, with dual Lagrangian formulations having the same physical spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Reader's inference: the inverse-spin gyromagnetic ratio matches a long-standing four-dimensional conjecture on magnetic moments, but the paper establishes it only for Bogomolny or Maxwell backgrounds, so whether it survives more general electromagnetic fields is open.
  • Reader's inference: the nonlocal expression for $\phi[A]$ can be read as finite-size electromagnetic corrections, so the model may serve as an effective description of extended charged objects, where the $g=1/s$ prediction could be tested against minimal coupling.
  • Reader's inference: the non-Abelian version of the higher-spin self-dual Yang-Mills action sketched in the paper is a natural next step; if the dimensional reduction works there, it would yield nonlinear interactions of massive higher-spin fields in three dimensions.
  • Reader's inference: a direct covariant computation of $W_A^2$ on rank-$s$ tensors for $s\ge 2$ would show whether the $1/s$ coefficient is a universal property of the first-order description or an artifact of the Bogomolny background class.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a first-order, chiral description of massive higher-spin fields in 3D Minkowski space and couples it minimally to a Bogomolny background consisting of a gauge field A_mu and a scalar phi. The central claims are: the coupled system (3.8) possesses 2s-1 gauge identities and hence the correct number of physical degrees of freedom; squaring the first-order equation yields the second-order equation (3.12) with an F-term whose coefficient implies g=1/s; the system admits a dual Lagrangian formulation (Sec. 4); and all these equations and Lagrangians follow by dimensional reduction of a higher-spin extension of self-dual Yang-Mills theory (Sec. 5). A free massive higher-spin Lagrangian is obtained as a by-product.

Significance. If the main claims were established, the result g=1/s would be noteworthy: it realizes, in a concrete 3D model, the Belinfante-type inverse relation between gyromagnetic ratio and spin, and it would provide a rare example of consistent electromagnetic coupling for arbitrary spin. The gauge-identity argument in Eq. (3.9) is explicit and is a genuine strength, as is the construction of a complex Lagrangian with a dual set of equations. However, the derivation of Eq. (3.12), which is the only evidence for the headline g=1/s, is not given, and a direct check in the simplest case does not reproduce the claimed coefficient. The dimensional-reduction connection in Sec. 5 is also asserted rather than demonstrated. The paper is therefore potentially significant, but the central quantitative claim is presently unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.12)] The derivation of Eq. (3.12) is the load-bearing step for the gyromagnetic-ratio claim, but it is not performed. The paper assumes an unstated U(1)-covariant version of the identity W^2=-s^2 Box on divergence-free symmetric traceless tensors, including commutator terms. A direct computation for s=1 with D_mu = partial_mu + ie A_mu and the constraint D^nu Phi_nu=0 gives (W_A^2 Phi)_mu = -D^2 Phi_mu - ie F_{mu beta} Phi^beta, while applying W_A to the right-hand side of (3.8) with M=m+ie phi and using the Bogomolny equation (3.5) gives W_A(M Phi)_mu = M^2 Phi_mu - ie F_{mu beta} Phi^beta. The F-terms cancel, so the resulting second-order equation is D^2 Phi + M^2 Phi = 0, not Eq. (3.12). If the derivative of M is dropped, the coefficient becomes 2 rather than 1. In either case the coefficient -ie/s in (3.12), and therefore the value g=1/s, is not established by the arguments presented.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.12) and Sec. 4] The effective mass M=m+ie phi is complex and point-dependent, but the paper does not analyze the consequences of this. The equations of motion and the Lagrangian (4.2) are complex, and the interpretation of a complex mass term in Minkowski space, its effect on unitarity, and the reality conditions on physical fields are not discussed. This matters because Eq. (3.12) is used to assert causal propagation and to identify the gyromagnetic ratio; a complex mass term would require a separate physical justification.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.23)] The claimed derivation of the 3D interaction from the dimensional reduction of higher-spin SDYM is not shown in detail. The text states that 'it is now evident' that the action (5.23) reproduces a sum of 3D actions, but the explicit reduction of the U(1)-covariant terms and the identification with Eqs. (3.8) and (4.1) are not carried out. Since the abstract and introduction present the dimensional-reduction origin as a key result, this omission leaves the connection between the 4D construction and the 3D equations unverified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.4)] Equation (3.4) is typeset incorrectly: the relation between the Klein-Gordon operator and (W-sm)(W+sm) should involve a factor 1/s^2, but the displayed formula appears garbled.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Lagrangin', 'threre', and 'transfromations', which should be corrected during revision.
  3. [Sec. 6] The by-product free massive higher-spin Lagrangian is not benchmarked against known descriptions, such as the Stueckelberg or frame-like formulations; a brief comparison would help the reader assess its novelty and utility.
  4. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.11)] The expression for phi[A] contains an integration constant phi_0, but the physical role of this constant and its effect on the complex mass M are not discussed; this is relevant because the gyromagnetic-ratio claim depends on the background field phi.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central equations are checked directly; self-citations are present but not load-bearing.

full rationale

The consistency claim for the system (3.8) is established by an explicit gauge identity (3.9), whose vanishing uses the Bogomolny equation (3.5); no fitted parameter is introduced and the degree-of-freedom count via (2.4) is self-contained. The gyromagnetic ratio g=1/s is read from the coefficient in (3.12), which is not inserted by hand; whether (3.12) actually follows from (3.8) depends on an unstated U(1)-covariant square-root identity for W_A. That is a correctness gap, and possibly an error, but it is not circular: the claim is not defined in terms of its own output. The dimensional-reduction connection in Sec. 5 rests on the higher-spin SDYM action of [60], which includes authors of the present paper, but the 3D equations were already verified independently in Sec. 3, so this self-citation is not load-bearing for the main result. No step reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central construction rests on structural assumptions from prior work: the involutive-system degree-of-freedom count, the chiral square-root property of W in 3D, and the identification of 3D massive modes as Kaluza-Klein modes of 4D self-dual Yang-Mills. The only hand-chosen quantity is the integration constant phi_0 in the nonlocal solution for the auxiliary scalar. No new physical entities with independent evidence are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Integration constant phi_0 in phi[A] (Eq. 3.11) = arbitrary real constant
    The scalar field solving the Bogomolny equation is determined by the vector potential only up to an additive constant; this constant shifts the complex effective mass M=m+ie phi in Eq. (3.12) and is not fixed by the consistency conditions.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The involutive-system degree-of-freedom formula (2.4) applies to the deformed interacting system once gauge identities are preserved.
    Used in Secs. 2 and 3 to conclude that (3.8) propagates the correct number of modes; the paper does not prove full involutivity of the deformed system beyond exhibiting one set of gauge identities.
  • ad hoc to paper The operator W squares to -s^2 times the d'Alembertian on divergence-free symmetric traceless tensors, and the same squaring works with U(1)-covariant derivatives to produce Eq. (3.12).
    The free identity is stated for W, but the covariant version, including commutator terms that fix the coefficient 1/s, is assumed without proof in Sec. 3.
  • domain assumption Massive 3D particles have two polarizations; a single chiral equation describes one helicity, so parity requires doubling to two complex fields with opposite charges.
    Motivates the spectrum doubling in Sec. 4 and the structure of the dual Lagrangians.
  • standard math Any source-free Maxwell field in 3D can be locally represented by the Bogomolny equation through the Poincare lemma.
    Used in Sec. 3 to reinterpret (A, phi) as an electromagnetic background and to write the nonlocal solution (3.11).
invented entities (2)
  • Auxiliary scalar field phi in the Bogomolny background
    purpose: Completes the electromagnetic background into a first-order system (3.5); after being eliminated via (3.11) it produces a nonlocal electromagnetic interaction and a complex mass shift.
    It is not an independent physical field; it is determined by A up to a constant and has no observational handle.
  • Dual fields Psi_plus, Psi_minus, Lambda_plus, Lambda_minus and vector B (Sec. 4)
    purpose: Lagrange multipliers and dual partners used to make the chiral matter system Lagrangian and parity-invariant.
    They are auxiliary or multiplier fields in the Lagrangian formulation, not new propagating particles with independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electromagnetic Interactions of Massive Higher-Spin Fields in 3D via Chiral Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BVFY65BI

@misc{pith2026241211052,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electromagnetic Interactions of Massive Higher-Spin Fields in 3D via Chiral Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BVFY65BI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11052}
}
abstract

We address the issue of electromagnetic interaction for massive higher-spin fields in $3d$ Minkowski space. We show that consistent field equations can be obtained through the dimensional reduction of the higher-spin extension of self-dual Yang-Mills theory, which itself is a truncation of chiral higher-spin gravity in four dimensions. The resulting electromagnetic field satisfies the Bogomolny equation, and the interaction is non-minimal with the gyromagnetic ratio given by $g=1/s$, where $s$ is the spin. As a by-product, we obtain a new Lagrangian for free massive higher-spin fields in $3d$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [72]

    All actions for free massive higher-spin fields

    W. Delplanque, “All actions for free massive higher-spin fields,” arXiv:2411.03463 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    All Possible Symmetries of the S Mat rix,

    S. R. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All Possible Symmetries of the S Mat rix,” Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 1251–1256

    work page 1967

  3. [2]

    Limits on Massless Particles,

    S. Weinberg and E. Witten, “Limits on Massless Particles,” Phys. Lett. 96B (1980) 59–62

    work page 1980

  4. [3]

    Massive gravity,

    C. de Rham, “Massive gravity,” Living reviews in relativity 17 no. 1, (2014) 1–189

    work page 2014

  5. [4]

    Spontaneous breaking of super symmetry through dimensional reduction,

    J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, “Spontaneous breaking of super symmetry through dimensional reduction,” Physics Letters B 82 no. 1, (1979) 60–64

    work page 1979

  6. [5]

    Lagrangians of N = 2 supergravity-matter sys- tems,

    B. de Wit, P. Lauwers, and A. Van Proeyen, “Lagrangians of N = 2 supergravity-matter sys- tems,” Nuclear Physics B 255 (1985) 569–608

    work page 1985

  7. [6]

    Causal propagation of a charged s pin 3/2 field in an external elec- tromagnetic background,

    M. Porrati and R. Rahman, “Causal propagation of a charged s pin 3/2 field in an external elec- tromagnetic background,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos mology 80 no. 2, (2009) 025009

    work page 2009

  8. [7]

    Massive spin three-half field in a constant electromagnetic background

    W. Delplanque and E. Skvortsov, “Massive spin three-half field in a constant electromagnetic background,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14148 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    On relativistic wave equations for particles o f arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli, “On relativistic wave equations for particles o f arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173 (1939) 211–232

    1939

  2. [9]

    Lagrangian formulation for arbit rary spin. 1. the boson case,

    L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen, “Lagrangian formulation for arbit rary spin. 1. the boson case,” Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 898–909

    1974

  3. [10]

    Lagrangian formulation for arb itrary spin. 2. the fermion case,

    L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen, “Lagrangian formulation for arb itrary spin. 2. the fermion case,” Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 910–920

    1974

  4. [11]

    Composite Systems and Field Theory for a Free Regge Trajectory,

    A. I. Pashnev, “Composite Systems and Field Theory for a Free Regge Trajectory,” Theor. Math. Phys. 78 (1989) 272–277

    1989

  5. [12]

    On massive high spin particles in (a)ds,

    Y. M. Zinoviev, “On massive high spin particles in (a)ds,” hep-th/0108192

    arXiv

  6. [13]

    Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massle ss higher spin fields,

    R. Metsaev, “Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massle ss higher spin fields,” Nuclear Physics B 759 no. 1-2, (2006) 147–201

    2006

  7. [14]

    BRST-BV approach to cubic interaction vertic es for massive and massless higher-spin fields,

    R. R. Metsaev, “BRST-BV approach to cubic interaction vertic es for massive and massless higher-spin fields,” Phys. Lett. B 720 (2013) 237–243, arXiv:1205.3131 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [15]

    On massive spin 2 interactions,

    Y. M. Zinoviev, “On massive spin 2 interactions,” Nucl. Phys. B770 (2007) 83–106, arXiv:hep-th/0609170

    2007 arXiv

  9. [16]

    On spin 3 interacting with gravity,

    Y. M. Zinoviev, “On spin 3 interacting with gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 035022, arXiv:0805.2226 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [17]

    On massive spin 2 electromagnetic interactions,

    Y. M. Zinoviev, “On massive spin 2 electromagnetic interactions,” Nucl. Phys. B 821 (2009) 431–451, arXiv:0901.3462 [hep-th] . 20

    2009 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Spin 3 cubic vertices in a frame-like formalism,

    Y. Zinoviev, “Spin 3 cubic vertices in a frame-like formalism,” JHEP 1008 (2010) 084, arXiv:1007.0158 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [19]

    On gravit ational interactions for massive higher spins in AdS3,

    I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, and Y. M. Zinoviev, “On gravit ational interactions for massive higher spins in AdS3,” J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214015, arXiv:1208.0183 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cubic inte raction vertex of higher-spin fields with external electromagnetic field,

    I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, and Y. M. Zinoviev, “Cubic inte raction vertex of higher-spin fields with external electromagnetic field,” Nucl. Phys. B 864 (2012) 694–721, arXiv:1204.2341 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [21]

    On higher spin cubic interactions in d = 3,

    Y. M. Zinoviev, “On higher spin cubic interactions in d = 3,” JHEP 11 (2021) 022, arXiv:2109.08480 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Scattering of Spinning B lack Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, “Scattering of Spinning B lack Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,” JHEP 09 (2019) 056, arXiv:1812.06895 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [23]

    The simplest ma ssive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, “The simplest ma ssive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,” JHEP 04 (2019) 156, arXiv:1812.08752 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Black-hole scattering w ith general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, “Black-hole scattering w ith general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 104024, arXiv:1906.10071 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Snowmass white paper: gravitational waves and scattering amplitudes,

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Snowmass white paper: gravitational waves and scattering amplitudes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05194 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Cubic action for spinning black hole s from massive higher-spin gauge symmetry,

    E. Skvortsov and M. Tsulaia, “Cubic action for spinning black hole s from massive higher-spin gauge symmetry,” JHEP 02 (2024) 202, arXiv:2312.08184 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Kerr Black Holes From Massive Higher-Spin Gauge Sy mmetry,

    L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini, a nd E. Skvortsov, “Kerr Black Holes From Massive Higher-Spin Gauge Sy mmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 22, (2023) 221401, arXiv:2212.06120 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Classical limit of higher-spin string amp litudes,

    L. Cangemi and P. Pichini, “Classical limit of higher-spin string amp litudes,” JHEP 06 (2023) 167, arXiv:2207.03947 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Comp- ton Amplitude for Rotating Black Hole from QFT,

    L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini, a nd E. Skvortsov, “Comp- ton Amplitude for Rotating Black Hole from QFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 7, (2024) 071601, arXiv:2312.14913 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Noncausality and Other Defects of Interaction Lagrangians for Particles with Spin One and Higher,

    G. Velo and D. Zwanzinger, “Noncausality and Other Defects of Interaction Lagrangians for Particles with Spin One and Higher,” Phys. Rev. 188 (Dec, 1969) 2218–2222

    1969

  24. [31]

    Consistent non-m inimal couplings of massive higher- spin particles,

    I. Cortese, R. Rahman, and M. Sivakumar, “Consistent non-m inimal couplings of massive higher- spin particles,” Nuclear Physics B 879 (2014) 143–161

    2014

  25. [32]

    Massive fields of arbitrary half integer spin in co nstant electromagnetic field,

    S. M. Klishevich, “Massive fields of arbitrary half integer spin in co nstant electromagnetic field,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 609–624, arXiv:hep-th/9811030. 21

    2000 arXiv

  26. [33]

    On electromagnetic interact ion of massive spin-2 particle,

    S. M. Klishevich and Y. M. Zinovev, “On electromagnetic interact ion of massive spin-2 particle,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 61 (1998) 1527–1537, arXiv:hep-th/9708150

    1998 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Massive Spin-2 Bosonic String St ates in an Electromagnetic Background,

    P. C. Argyres and C. R. Nappi, “Massive Spin-2 Bosonic String St ates in an Electromagnetic Background,” Phys. Lett. B 224 (1989) 89–96

    1989

  28. [35]

    Electromagnetic interaction of massive spin 3 s tate from string theory,

    S. M. Klishevich, “Electromagnetic interaction of massive spin 3 s tate from string theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 395–411, arXiv:hep-th/9805174

    2000 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Higher-spin s tates of the superstring in an electromagnetic background,

    K. Benakli, N. Berkovits, C. A. Daniel, and M. Lize, “Higher-spin s tates of the superstring in an electromagnetic background,” JHEP 12 (2021) 112, arXiv:2110.07623 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Consistent int eractions and involution,

    D. Kaparulin, S. Lyakhovich, and A. Sharapov, “Consistent int eractions and involution,” JHEP 1301 (2013) 097, arXiv:1210.6821 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  31. [38]

    W. M. Seiler, Involution: The Formal Theory of Differential Equations and its Applications in Computer vol. 24 of Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010

    2010

  32. [39]

    Inconsistencies of massive charged gravitating higher spins,

    S. Deser and A. Waldron, “Inconsistencies of massive charged gravitating higher spins,” Nuclear Physics B 631 no. 1-2, (2002) 369–387

    2002

  33. [40]

    Massive spin-2 bosonic string st ates in an electromagnetic background,

    P. C. Argyres and C. R. Nappi, “Massive spin-2 bosonic string st ates in an electromagnetic background,” Physics Letters B 224 no. 1, (1989) 89–96

    1989

  34. [41]

    g = 2 as the natural value of the tree-level gyromag- netic ratio of elementary particles,

    S. Ferrara, M. Porrati, and V. L. Telegdi, “ g = 2 as the natural value of the tree-level gyromag- netic ratio of elementary particles,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (Oct, 1992) 3529–3537

    1992

  35. [42]

    String theory and th e Velo–Zwanziger problem,

    M. Porrati, R. Rahman, and A. Sagnotti, “String theory and th e Velo–Zwanziger problem,” Nuclear Physics B 846 no. 2, (2011) 250–282

    2011

  36. [43]

    Higher-spin s tates of the superstring in an electromagnetic background,

    K. Benakli, N. Berkovits, C. A. Daniel, and M. Lize, “Higher-spin s tates of the superstring in an electromagnetic background,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 no. 12, (2021) 1–34

    2021

  37. [44]

    Electromagnetic Interactions of a Yang-Mills Field,

    R. J. Finkelstein, “Electromagnetic Interactions of a Yang-Mills Field,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 (Apr, 1964) 632–640

    1964

  38. [45]

    How large is the “natural

    B. R. Holstein, “How large is the “natural” magnetic moment?,” American Journal of Physics 74 no. 12, (2006) 1104–1111

    2006

  39. [46]

    Solutions of the Einste in and Einstein-Maxwell Equations,

    G. C. Debney, R. P. Kerr, and A. Schild, “Solutions of the Einste in and Einstein-Maxwell Equations,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 10 no. 10, (10, 1969) 1842–1854

    1969

  40. [47]

    Gyromagnetic ratio of charged kerr–anti-de sitte r black holes,

    A. N. Aliev, “Gyromagnetic ratio of charged kerr–anti-de sitte r black holes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 24 no. 18, (2007) 4669

    2007

  41. [48]

    Self-duality in odd dimensions,

    P. Townsend, K. Pilch, and P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, “Self-duality in odd dimensions,” Physics Letters B 136 no. 1, (1984) 38–42

    1984

  42. [49]

    General backgrounds for higher s pin massive particles,

    I. Cortese and M. Kulaxizi, “General backgrounds for higher s pin massive particles,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11535 (2017) . 22

    2017 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Intrinsic magnetic moment of elementary par ticles of spin 3 2 ,

    F. J. Belinfante, “Intrinsic magnetic moment of elementary par ticles of spin 3 2 ,” Phys. Rev. 92 (Nov, 1953) 997–1001

    1953

  44. [51]

    Magnetic moment of a particle with arbitrary spin,

    C. R. Hagen and W. J. Hurley, “Magnetic moment of a particle with arbitrary spin,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 24 (Jun, 1970) 1381–1384

    1970

  45. [52]

    A mass term for three-dimensional gauge fie lds,

    J. F. Schonfeld, “A mass term for three-dimensional gauge fie lds,” Nuclear Physics B 185 no. 1, (1981) 157–171

    1981

  46. [53]

    Three-dimensional ma ssive gauge theories,

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, “Three-dimensional ma ssive gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (Apr, 1982) 975–978

    1982

  47. [54]

    Higher derivative Chern–Simons exten sions,

    S. Deser and R. Jackiw, “Higher derivative Chern–Simons exten sions,” Physics Letters B 451 no. 1-2, (1999) 73–76

    1999

  48. [55]

    Highe r derivative extensions of 3d Chern–Simons models: conservation laws and stability,

    D. S. Kaparulin, I. Y. Karataeva, and S. L. Lyakhovich, “Highe r derivative extensions of 3d Chern–Simons models: conservation laws and stability,” The European Physical Journal C 75 (2015) 1–10

    2015

  49. [56]

    Stab le interactions in higher deriva- tive field theories of derived type,

    V. A. Abakumova, S. L. Lyakhovich, and D. S. Kaparulin, “Stab le interactions in higher deriva- tive field theories of derived type,” Physical Review D 99 no. 4, (2019) 045020

    2019

  50. [57]

    On the Minimal Model of Anyons,

    I. V. Gorbunov, S. M. Kuzenko, and S. L. Lyakhovich, “On the Minimal Model of Anyons,” International Journal of Modern Physics A 12 no. 23, (1997) 4199–4215

    1997

  51. [58]

    Cubic interactions of arbitrary spin fields in 3d fl at space,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Cubic interactions of arbitrary spin fields in 3d fl at space,” J. Phys. A 53 no. 44, (2020) 445401, arXiv:2005.12224 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [59]

    A Stringy theory in thr ee dimensions and Massive Higher Spins,

    E. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “A Stringy theory in thr ee dimensions and Massive Higher Spins,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 126010, arXiv:2006.05809 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Actions for Self-du al Higher Spin Gravities,

    K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov, and T. Tran, “Actions for Self-du al Higher Spin Gravities,” arXiv:2105.12782 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  54. [61]

    Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,

    D. Ponomarev, “Chiral Higher Spin Theories and Self-Duality,” JHEP 12 (2017) 141, arXiv:1710.00270 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,

    R. R. Metsaev, “Poincare invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 359–367

    1991

  56. [63]

    S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of int ernal symmetry,

    R. R. Metsaev, “ S matrix approach to massless higher spins theory. 2: The Case of int ernal symmetry,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 2411–2421

    1991

  57. [64]

    Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,

    D. Ponomarev and E. D. Skvortsov, “Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space,” J. Phys. A50 no. 9, (2017) 095401, arXiv:1609.04655 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Quantum Chiral High er Spin Gravity,

    E. D. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “Quantum Chiral High er Spin Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 3, (2018) 031601, arXiv:1805.00048 [hep-th] . 23

    2018 arXiv

  59. [66]

    More on Quantum Chira l Higher Spin Gravity,

    E. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia, “More on Quantum Chira l Higher Spin Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D101 no. 10, (2020) 106001, arXiv:2002.08487 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [67]

    The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitude s,

    G. Chalmers and W. Siegel, “The Selfdual sector of QCD amplitude s,” Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 7628–7633, arXiv:hep-th/9606061 [hep-th]

    1996 arXiv

  61. [68]

    On the phase space of free higher-spin theories an d conformal transformations,

    H. Flores, “On the phase space of free higher-spin theories an d conformal transformations,” Nuclear Physics B 925 (2017) 431–454

    2017

  62. [69]

    Actions for self-du al higher spin gravities,

    K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov, and T. Tran, “Actions for self-du al higher spin gravities,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 no. 8, (2021) 1–30

    2021

  63. [70]

    Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and se lf-duality,

    T. Adamo and T. Tran, “Higher-spin Yang–Mills, amplitudes and se lf-duality,” Letters in Math- ematical Physics 113 no. 3, (2023) 50

    2023

  64. [71]

    Chiral Approach to Massive High er Spins,

    A. Ochirov and E. Skvortsov, “Chiral Approach to Massive High er Spins,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 24, (2022) 241601, arXiv:2207.14597 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Dimensional reduction and BRST a pproach to the description of a Regge trajectory,

    A. Pashnev and M. M. Tsulaia, “Dimensional reduction and BRST a pproach to the description of a Regge trajectory,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12 (1997) 861–870, arXiv:hep-th/9703010

    1997 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Self-Dual Gravity,

    K. Krasnov, “Self-Dual Gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34 no. 9, (2017) 095001, arXiv:1610.01457 [hep-th] . 24

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.