Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Nonperturbative features in the Lie-algebraic K\"ahler sigma model with fermions

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The deformed CP^1 quantum mechanics has the same nonperturbative ambiguity structure as the undeformed model, with the deformation entering only at three loops.

desk verdict Solid extension of the CP1 bion/resurgence program to the k-deformed sausage model; the one-loop ambiguity structure is plausibly the same, but the three-loop k-dependence is a conjecture and the one-loop prefactor rests on an asserted kink identity. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11444 v2 pith:VQ3OXRTL submitted 2024-12-16 hep-th quant-ph

Chao-Hsiang Sheu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thquant-ph
keywords trans-seriesresurgencebionCP^1sigmamodelLie-algebraicdeformationelongationparameterLefschetzthimblefermions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper investigates the quantum-mechanical model obtained by compactifying a Lie-algebraically deformed $CP^{1}$ $\sigma$ model with right-handed fermions, and asks whether its nonperturbative corrections have the same structure as the undeformed $CP^{1}$ model. The author constructs the real, complex, and multi-bion saddle points of the deformed theory and computes their contributions to the ground-state energy through a trans-series. The central result is that the ambiguity structure observed in the $CP^{1}$ model persists: the one-bion and multibion sectors cancel their Borel ambiguities in exactly the same way, with the deformation appearing only through the effective mass $m_* = m\log R_0/\sqrt{k^2-1}$ in the bion action. For the nearly supersymmetric regime, second-order perturbation theory produces the same ambiguous term, and the author proposes that the elongation parameter $k$ first enters the perturbative series at three-loop order through the RG-invariant combination $g^4(k^2-1)$. A sympathetic reader would care because this extends the resurgence-based description of nonperturbative quantum fluctuations from the benchmark $CP^{1}$ model to a one-parameter family of deformed $\sigma$ models, including the eta-deformed sausage models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective action of a well-separated kink-anti-kink pair, Eq. (3.7): $S_{\rm eff} = (2m/g^2)(\log R_0/\sqrt{k^2-1} - 2e^{-m\tau_{Br}}\cos\alpha_{Br}) + 2m\epsilon\tau_{Br} + O(g^2)$, with $R_0 \equiv k+\sqrt{k^2-1}$. Because this is the same function of the quasi-moduli $\tau_{Br}$ and $\alpha_{Br}$ as in the undeformed $CP^{1}$ model, every later ingredient—the Lefschetz-thimble flow equation, the one-bion integral, and the multibion formula (C.3)—is inherited from the $CP^{1}$ analysis after replacing $m/g^2$ by $m_*/g^2$, where $m_* = m\log R_0/\sqrt{k^2-1}$ is the effective mass. The argument also relies on the claim, cited from [6], that the kink solution in the deformed model is the same as in the undeformed model, and on a verification of the valley equation (3.4) to $O(g^2)$ that the text states without displaying.

What would settle it

Evaluate the one-loop fluctuation determinant around the deformed-model kink directly from the metric $G=(2/g^2)(1+2k|\varphi|^2+|\varphi|^4)^{-1}$, without importing the $CP^{1}$ result: if the prefactor in Eq. (3.11) acquires any $k$-dependent correction beyond the effective-mass rescaling, the claimed ambiguity structure fails. Alternatively, verify the valley equation (3.4) at $O(g^2)$ explicitly for the deformed metric; any $k$-dependence in the coefficients $K^\nu$ beyond the rescaling (C.1) would change Eq. (3.7) and break the trans-series.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the ground-state energy of the k-deformed $CP^{1}$ quantum mechanics with $N_f$ right-handed chiral fermions is governed by a trans-series of bion saddle points whose nonperturbative ambiguities match the undeformed $CP^{1}$ model. The effective action for a well-separated kink-anti-kink pair is found to be $S_{\rm eff} = (2m/g^2)(\log R_0/\sqrt{k^2-1} - 2e^{-m\tau_{Br}}\cos\alpha_{Br}) + 2m\epsilon\tau_{Br} + O(g^2)$, with $R_0 \equiv k+\sqrt{k^2-1}$, so the only difference from $CP^{1}$ is the constant inside the logarithm. From this the paper derives the one-bion correction, Eq. (3.15), and the p-bion series, Eqs. (3.16) and (C.3), and shows that the ambiguities cancel between adjacent bion sectors. In the nearly supersymmetric limit $\epsilon\to 1$, Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory yields the same ambiguous piece, Eq. (4.13), whose weak-coupling coefficients carry ambiguity $\pm 2\pi i m p^2$ and cancel between $E^{(2)}_p$ and $E^{(2)}_{p+1}$. The paper further proposes that the deformation parameter $k$ first shows up in the perturbative series at three loops through the RG-invariant combination $g^4(k^2-1)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the kink-anti-kink pair in the deformed model behaves exactly as in the undeformed $CP^{1}$ model, so that the deformation changes only the constant in the effective action; the paper cites the kink equivalence to [6] and states that the valley equation is verified to $O(g^2)$ without showing the verification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The one-bion correction to the ground-state energy is given by Eq. (3.15); its nonperturbative ambiguity appears only when $\epsilon$ deviates from 1, at second order in $\epsilon-1$.
  • The p-bion sectors form a trans-series whose ambiguities cancel between neighboring sectors, exactly as in the standard CP^1 model, so no net ambiguity survives in the ground-state energy at this order.
  • In the nearly supersymmetric regime, the second-order correction contains an ambiguous term, Eq. (4.13), whose coefficients $E^{(2)}_p$ have ambiguity $\pm 2\pi i m p^2$, canceling between $E^{(2)}_p$ and $E^{(2)}_{p+1}$.
  • The elongation parameter $k$ is predicted to be invisible in the perturbative series through two loops, with the first $k$-dependent term appearing at three loops through $g^4(k^2-1)$.
  • The RG-invariant combination $g^4(k^2-1)$ controls the three-loop effect, tying the nonperturbative structure to the renormalization-group flow of the two-dimensional parent theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the three-loop conjecture is correct, a two-loop perturbative calculation of the ground-state energy in the deformed model should be exactly $k$-independent; this gives a sharp, computable test that can settle the conjecture before three loops are reached.
  • The same logic suggests that ratios of bion-sector coefficients, once rescaled by the effective mass $m_*$, should collapse onto the CP^1 curve for all $k$; a numerical Hamiltonian or lattice computation of the deformed quantum mechanics could check this directly.
  • Because the kink-equivalence assumption is cited rather than derived, an independent check of the kink profile and quasi-moduli metric for the deformed metric (2.3) at next order in $g^2$ would either strengthen the claim or reveal $k$-dependent corrections to the one-loop prefactor.
  • If the three-loop $g^4(k^2-1)$ term is the first deformation signature, then interpolating $k$ from 1 to large values traces a one-parameter family of resurgent structures, which may connect to the integrable Lamé-system solution of the deformed model through the compactification scheme discussed in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the trans-series structure of a quantum mechanical model obtained by compactifying a Lie-algebraic (sausage-type) deformation of the CP^1 sigma model with multiple fermions. It constructs real, complex, and multibion saddle-point solutions, computes one-loop corrections to the ground state energy via the path integral and Lefschetz thimbles, and compares the result with a Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory around the supersymmetric point. The central claim is that the nonperturbative ambiguity structure of the standard CP^1 model persists in the deformed model, with the deformation parameter k entering the perturbation series only at three-loop order through a term proportional to g^4(k^2-1). The paper also provides explicit formulas for one-bion and multibion trans-series coefficients and for the ambiguous part of the second-order energy correction.

Significance. If the technical gaps are filled, the paper would usefully extend the resurgence analysis of CP^1 quantum mechanics to a one-parameter deformation related to η-deformed sigma models, giving evidence that the ambiguity structure is robust under Lie-algebraic deformation. The explicit bion solutions, the two-method comparison, and the RG-flow discussion are valuable, and the paper contains no fitted parameters. The main significance is therefore conditional on verifying the kink-antikink valley equation and the one-loop prefactor in the deformed model, since these are load-bearing for the claimed persistence of the ambiguity structure.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.4) and footnote 5] The valley equation (3.4) is stated to be verified up to O(g^2) by the kink-antikink ansatz (3.6) with the coefficients K^{τ_Br} and K^{α_Br} given in (3.5), but the verification is not shown. Since the effective action (3.7) and all subsequent thimble integrations depend on this ansatz being the correct valley configuration in the deformed model, the manuscript should present the actual substitution or an explicit derivation. Without this, Eq. (3.7) remains an assertion, not a derived result.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.11)] The one-loop prefactor 8m^4/(π g^4) in Eq. (3.11) is obtained by approximating the fluctuation determinant ratio det(G)det(G')det(Δ_0)/det''(Δ_B) as a double copy of a single kink, and by citing reference [6] for the claim that the kink solution in the deformed model equals that of the undeformed CP^1 model. The quasi-moduli metric and the determinant ratio are never computed in the deformed model. If the kink fluctuation spectrum or the quasi-moduli metric carried any k-dependence, the prefactor and hence the ambiguity coefficients in Eqs. (3.15)–(3.16) would shift in a k-dependent way. This point must be demonstrated explicitly or the prefactor must be derived from the deformed-model data.
  3. [Sec. 4.1 and Sec. 5] The statement that the deformation parameter enters the perturbative series only at three loops through g^4(k^2-1) is explicitly labeled a conjecture (Sec. 4.1, and echoed in Sec. 5). This is a limitation acknowledged by the manuscript, not a hidden flaw, but it means the central persistence claim is fully established only at one-loop order in the path integral and at second order in δϵ for the ambiguous subset E_amb. The abstract should make this degree of support explicit, distinguishing the proven orders from the conjectured three-loop structure.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.11)–(4.15)] The computation of E^(2) in Eq. (4.11) ignores E^(2)_namb,1 and analyzes only the ambiguous part E_amb. While this is a legitimate strategy for isolating ambiguities, the claimed cancellation of ambiguities between adjacent bion sectors in Eqs. (4.14)–(4.15) applies only to this subset. Moreover, the comparison with the path-integral result (C.6) is made in the ϵ→1 limit, but the two-loop k-dependence is not independently derived from the path integral. The paper should clarify that the persistence claim at second order concerns the structure of the ambiguity, not the full two-loop energy.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, after Eq. (3.6)] The definitions of the quasi-moduli coordinates contain typos: τ_Br = τ_B+ − τ_B+ and α_Br = α_B+ − α_B+ should presumably read τ_Br = τ_B+ − τ_B− and α_Br = α_B+ − α_B−.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.15b)] The term ±2πip^2 is written with p^2 rather than p^2 inside the imaginary unit; while the notation is understandable, it would be clearer as ±2πi p^2, and the sentence 'the ambiguity cancel out between E_p and E_{p+1}' should be expanded to explain the exact sense of cancellation, since the coefficients in (4.15) do not cancel pairwise term by term.
  3. [Appendix D, around Eq. (D.2)] The text refers to 'the first-order differential equation (D.2)', but Eq. (D.2) is a second-order ordinary differential equation; please correct the wording.
  4. [Sec. 2.3.1, Eq. (2.26)] The real bion solution φ_rb depends on k through ω_k and through the prefactor, and the kink-antikink decomposition in Eq. (2.28) also uses k-dependent τ± and α±; this makes the later assertion that the kink solution itself is k-independent (used in Sec. 3.1) non-obvious and worth a dedicated comment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the deformed-model trans-series follows from evaluating the genuine deformed action; the self-citation for the kink identity is external support, and the three-loop k-dependence is explicitly conjectural.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain starts from the deformed CP1 action (2.10)/(2.21) and computes the bion saddle actions (2.31)-(2.33), the effective kink-antikink action (3.7), and the valley/thimble prefactor (3.11). No parameter is fitted to the target ambiguity structure. The effective action (3.7) differs from the CP1 result only in the constant term, and the subsequent integrals (3.13)-(3.16) are evaluated from that action, with the flow equation reduced to the CP1 form by the rescaling (C.1); this is a derived comparison, not an assumption of the conclusion. The one-loop prefactor's k-independence is asserted via the kink identity from the author's prior published work [6], and the valley-equation verification is only stated in footnote 5, but these are external or stated premises rather than definitions of the target result; the citation is to a separate construction of the deformed model, not to the trans-series being claimed. The proposal that g^4(k^2-1) enters at three loops is explicitly a conjecture (Sec. 4.1), and the second-order analysis isolates the ambiguous part E_amb; an unproved or conjectural step is a correctness risk, not circularity. The internal consistency check between the path-integral one-loop formula and the delta-epsilon perturbation in the epsilon-to-1 limit (Eqs. (4.7)-(4.8) and (C.5)) is a cross-check between independent calculational routes. Therefore no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; k, g^2, m, and epsilon are physical inputs and m* is a derived effective mass. The core assumptions are the standard resurgence machinery, the KK reduction to quantum mechanics, the valley-equation ansatz, and the conjectural three-loop entry of k. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Resurgence and Lefschetz thimble machinery, including Borel summation and analytic continuation of elliptic integrals, is assumed valid for this quantum mechanical model.
    Used throughout Sec. 3 and Appendices A, C, and D to extract ambiguous contributions from saddle point integrals.
  • domain assumption The KK compactification on R times S^1 with Z2 twisted boundary conditions and restriction to the lowest mode n=0 gives the effective QM Lagrangian (2.10) that captures the leading semiclassical physics.
    Sec. 2.2; this is the standard reduction used in [1,2], but it is an assumption about which modes dominate.
  • domain assumption The fermion number projection and the continuous parameter epsilon replacing Nf reduce the problem to the bosonic Hamiltonian (2.12).
    Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.12); the replacement of Nf by continuous epsilon is a deformation of the potential.
  • ad hoc to paper The valley equation (3.4) is satisfied up to O(g^2) by the kink-antikink ansatz with the stated coefficients (3.5).
    Sec. 3.1, footnote 5; the verification is asserted but not demonstrated, and the one-loop determinant calculation depends on it.
  • domain assumption The kink solution of the deformed model is identical to that of the undeformed CP1 model, so the one-loop prefactor ratio is the same.
    Sec. 3.1, after Eq. (3.12); the identity of the kink solutions is cited to [6] rather than derived in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The deformation parameter k enters the perturbation series only at three-loop order through g^4(k^2-1).
    Sec. 4.1; stated as a conjecture, not derived, so it is an assumption about the structure of higher-loop corrections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonperturbative features in the Lie-algebraic K\"ahler sigma model with fermions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VQ3OXRTL

@misc{pith2026241211444,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonperturbative features in the Lie-algebraic K\"ahler sigma model with fermions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VQ3OXRTL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11444}
}
abstract

We investigate the trans-series structure of a quantum mechanical system originating from a Lie-algebraic K\"ahler sigma model with multiple right-handed chiral fermions, extending previous results for the standard onecomplex projective ($\mathbb{CP}^1$) model [1],[2] to its deformed counterpart. We identify and analyze saddle point solutions and examine their contributions within the perturbative expansions of the ground state energy, revealing that the ambiguity structure observed in the $\mathbb{CP}^1$ model persists in the deformed model as well. Additionally, we explore the role of the elongation parameter and its potential impact on higher-loop corrections, and propose that it becomes relevant in shaping the system's quantum behavior from the three-loop level. This verifies that the trans-series framework provides a comprehensive approach to capturing the structure of quantum fluctuations and ambiguities in these deformed sigma models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11444 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The RG flow of g 2 and k couplings. The flow is from UV to IR. The separatrices are marked with green and red lines while the thick black line represents an example of the RG flow in the limit of the sausage model (i.e. large k). See for example [8, 44] for the illustration of the sausage model. Adding fermions To get fermions involved in the model, let us start with considering its N = (0, 2) supersymmetrization si… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The profile of the real bion solution. The parameters are given as follows. m = 1, ϵ = 1.1, g = 1/500. 2.3.1 Single bion configuration In the current model, there are two distinct bion solutions, the real bion and the complex bion. The latter one can be viewed as the complexification of the previous one in the parameter space. Real bion solution Let us start with the real bion configuration. The solution to Eq. (2.2… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Lagrangian over Euclidean time τ . The parameters are given as follows. m = 1, ϵ = 1.1, g = 1/500. Then we can read off the Lagrangian of the real bion solutions Lrb = 4mϵ 4mϵk2ω 4 k cosh2 ωk(τ − τ0) k 2ω 4 k + 2k 2ω 2 k (ω 2 k − m2 ) sinh2 ωk(τ − τ0) + (ω 2 k − m2 ) 2 sinh4 ωk(τ − τ0) − ϵm (2.30) depicted in figure 3. As shown in the figure, the two peaks emerge as explained previously that the (real) bion conf… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The profile function of the complex bion solution. The parameters are given as follows. m = 1, ϵ = 1.1, g = 1/500. system. For this purpose, we can complexify the configuration space and search for the solution to the equation of motion (2.25). That is, we allow θ(τ ) …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The regularized profile function of the complex bion solution. The parameters are given as follows. m = 1, ϵ = 1.1, g = e 0.01i/500. The complex bion solution also admits a representation as a kink-antikink pair, say, φcb = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The integration contour of the difference between S[φrb] and S[φcb] over the complex variable τ . The sign of the complexified coupling g 2 determines which pair of poles is include in the contour. 2.3.2 Multibion configuration In the previous discussion, we have recog…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The regularized profile function of the multibion solution. The parameters are given as follows. m = 1, k = 2, ϵ = 1.1, g = e 0.01i/200, β = 100. The x, y, z axes are the Euclidean time τ , the real part of Σ, and the imaginary part of Σ, respectively. where K(z) is th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Lie-algebraic K\"ahler sigma models with the U(1) isotropy

    C.-H. Sheu and M. Shifman, Lie-algebraic K¨ ahler sigma models with U(1) isotropy, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 125017, arXiv:2404.03630 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Fujimori, S

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Nonperturbative contri- butions from complexified solutions in CP N −1models, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 105002, arXiv:1607.04205 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    Fujimori, S

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Exact resurgent trans- series and multibion contributions to all orders , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 105001, arXiv:1702.00589 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [3]

    Gamayun, A

    O. Gamayun, A. Losev, and M. Shifman, Peculiarities of beta functions in sigma models, JHEP 10 (2023) 097, arXiv:2307.04665 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    Sheu and M

    C.-H. Sheu and M. Shifman, Remarks on baby Skyrmion Lie-algebraic generalization, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 065003, arXiv:2303.12597 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    First-order formalism for $\beta$ functions in bosonic sigma models from supersymmetry breaking

    O. Gamayun, A. Losev, and M. Shifman, First-order formalism for β functions in bosonic sigma models from supersymmetry breaking , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 025017, arXiv:2312.01885 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Witten, On string theory and black holes , Phys

    E. Witten, On string theory and black holes , Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 314–324

    1991

  8. [8]

    V. A. Fateev, E. Onofri, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrable deformations of the O(3) sigma model. The sausage model , Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 521–565

    work page 1993

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Klimcik, Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality , JHEP 12 (2002) 051, arXiv:hep-th/0210095

    C. Klimcik, Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality , JHEP 12 (2002) 051, arXiv:hep-th/0210095

    2002 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Klimcik, On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model , J

    C. Klimcik, On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model , J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 043508, arXiv:0802.3518 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Sfetsos, K

    K. Sfetsos, K. Siampos, and D. C. Thompson, Generalised integrable λ - and η-deformations and their relation , Nucl. Phys. B 899 (2015) 489–512, arXiv:1506.05784 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, On classical q-deformations of integrable sigma- models, JHEP 11 (2013) 192, arXiv:1308.3581 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bykov and D

    D. Bykov and D. Lust, Deformed σ-models, Ricci flow and Toda field theories , Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021) 150, arXiv:2005.01812 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, Derivation of the action and symmetries of the q-deformed AdS5 × S5 superstring, JHEP 10 (2014) 132, arXiv:1406.6286 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, Integrable deformation of the ads5 × s5 super- string action , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (Feb, 2014) 051601

    2014

  8. [16]

    Hoare, Integrable deformations of sigma models , J

    B. Hoare, Integrable deformations of sigma models , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 093001, arXiv:2109.14284 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    V. V. Bazhanov, G. A. Kotousov, and S. L. Lukyanov, On the Yang–Baxter Pois- son algebra in non-ultralocal integrable systems , Nucl. Phys. B 934 (2018) 529–556, arXiv:1805.07417 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    V. V. Bazhanov, G. A. Kotousov, and S. L. Lukyanov, Quantum transfer-matrices for the sausage model , JHEP 01 (2018) 021, arXiv:1706.09941 [hep-th]. 30

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    ´Ecalle, Les fonctions r´ esurgentes

    J. ´Ecalle, Les fonctions r´ esurgentes. Vols. I-III, Universit´ e de Paris-Sud, D´ epartement de Math´ ematiques, Bˆ at. 425, 1981

    1981

  12. [20]

    Ba¸ sar and G

    G. Ba¸ sar and G. V. Dunne,Resurgence and the Nekrasov-Shatashvili limit: connect- ing weak and strong coupling in the Mathieu and Lam´ e systems , JHEP 02 (2015) 160, arXiv:1501.05671 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Behtash, G

    A. Behtash, G. V. Dunne, T. Sch¨ afer, T. Sulejmanpasic, and M. ¨Unsal, Toward Pi- card–Lefschetz theory of path integrals, complex saddles and resurgence , Ann. Math. Sci. Appl. 02 (2017) 95–212, arXiv:1510.03435 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Fujimori, S

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Resurgence Structure to All Orders of Multi-bions in Deformed SUSY Quantum Mechanics , PTEP 2017 (2017) 083B02, arXiv:1705.10483 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Fujimori, S

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, All-order resurgence from complexified path integral in a quantum mechanical system with integrability , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 105011, arXiv:2205.07436 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, Resurgence and Trans-series in Quantum Field Theory: The CP(N-1) Model , JHEP 11 (2012) 170, arXiv:1210.2423 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Cherman, D

    A. Cherman, D. Dorigoni, G. V. Dunne, and M. ¨Unsal, Resurgence in Quantum Field Theory: Nonperturbative Effects in the Principal Chiral Model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 021601, arXiv:1308.0127 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal, Resurgence and Dynamics of O(N) and Grassmannian Sigma Models, JHEP 09 (2015) 199, arXiv:1505.07803 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Demulder, D

    S. Demulder, D. Dorigoni, and D. C. Thompson, Resurgence in η-deformed Principal Chiral Models, JHEP 07 (2016) 088, arXiv:1604.07851 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Fujimori, S

    T. Fujimori, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Bion non-perturbative contributions versus infrared renormalons in two-dimensional CP N −1 models, JHEP 02 (2019) 190, arXiv:1810.03768 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Schepers and D

    L. Schepers and D. C. Thompson, Resurgence in the bi-Yang-Baxter model , Nucl. Phys. B 964 (2021) 115308, arXiv:2007.03683 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Marino, R

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas, and T. Reis, Testing the Bethe ansatz with large N renor- malons, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (2021) 2641–2666, arXiv:2102.03078 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Di Pietro, M

    L. Di Pietro, M. Mari˜ no, G. Sberveglieri, and M. Serone,Resurgence and 1/N Expan- sion in Integrable Field Theories , JHEP 10 (2021) 166, arXiv:2108.02647 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Marino, R

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas, and T. Reis, New renormalons from analytic trans-series, JHEP 08 (2022) 279, arXiv:2111.11951 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Marino, R

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas, and T. Reis, Instantons, renormalons and the theta angle in integrable sigma models , SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 184, arXiv:2205.04495 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Couso-Santamar ´ ıa, J

    R. Couso-Santamar ´ ıa, J. D. Edelstein, R. Schiappa, and M. Vonk, Resurgent Transseries and the Holomorphic Anomaly: Nonperturbative Closed Strings in Local CP2, Commun. Math. Phys. 338 (2015) 285–346, arXiv:1407.4821 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gu and M

    J. Gu and M. Marino, Peacock patterns and new integer invariants in topological string theory, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 058, arXiv:2104.07437 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gu and M

    J. Gu and M. Marino, Exact multi-instantons in topological string theory , SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 179, arXiv:2211.01403 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Gu, A.-K

    J. Gu, A.-K. Kashani-Poor, A. Klemm, and M. Marino, Non-perturbative topo- 31 logical string theory on compact Calabi-Yau 3-folds , SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 079, arXiv:2305.19916 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Marino and R

    M. Marino and R. Miravitllas, Large N instantons from topological strings , SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 155, arXiv:2306.01104 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Marino and M

    M. Marino and M. Schwick, Large N instantons, BPS states, and the replica limit , arXiv:2403.14462 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Lam´ e,M´ emoire sur les surfaces isothermes dans les corps solides homog` enes en ´ equilibre de temp´ erature, JMPA 2 (1837) 147

    G. Lam´ e,M´ emoire sur les surfaces isothermes dans les corps solides homog` enes en ´ equilibre de temp´ erature, JMPA 2 (1837) 147

  33. [41]

    G. V. Dunne and M. Shifman, Duality and selfduality (energy reflection symme- try) of quasiexactly solvable periodic potentials , Annals Phys. 299 (2002) 143–173, arXiv:hep-th/0204224

    2002 arXiv

  34. [42]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “ NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions .”. https://dlmf.nist.gov/

  35. [43]

    Scherk and J

    J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 61–88

    1979

  36. [44]

    S. L. Lukyanov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrability in 2D fields theory/sigma- models. in Integrability: From Statistical Systems to Gauge Theory: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 106, June 2016 . Oxford University Press, 07, 2019

    2016

  37. [45]

    Witten, Two-dimensional models with (0,2) supersymmetry: Perturbative aspects , Adv

    E. Witten, Two-dimensional models with (0,2) supersymmetry: Perturbative aspects , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11 (2007) 1–63, arXiv:hep-th/0504078

    2007 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Shifman and A

    M. Shifman and A. Yung, Heterotic Flux Tubes in N=2 SQCD with N=1 Preserving Deformations, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 125016, arXiv:0803.0158 [hep-th]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 049901 (2009)]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [47]

    J. Chen, X. Cui, M. Shifman, and A. Vainshtein, N=(0,2) deformation of (2, 2) sigma models: Geometric structure, holomorphic anomaly, and exact β functions, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 045014, arXiv:1404.4689 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Cui and M

    X. Cui and M. Shifman, N=(0,2) Deformation of CP(1) Model: Two-dimensional Analog of N=1 Yang-Mills Theory in Four Dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 045004, arXiv:1111.6350 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Cui and M

    X. Cui and M. Shifman, Perturbative Aspects of Heterotically Deformed CP(N-1) Sigma Model. I , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 105022, arXiv:1009.4421 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Sheu and M

    C.-H. Sheu and M. Shifman, From Gauged Linear Sigma Models to Geomet- ric Representation of WCP(N, eN ) in 2D , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 025007, arXiv:1907.09460 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    I. I. Balitsky and A. V. Yung, Collective - Coordinate Method for Quasizero Modes , Phys. Lett. B 168 (1986) 113–119

    1986

  44. [52]

    A. V. Yung, Instanton Vacuum in Supersymmetric QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 297 (1988) 47

    1988

  45. [53]

    Mari˜ no,Lectures on non-perturbative effects in large N gauge theories, matrix models and strings , Fortsch

    M. Mari˜ no,Lectures on non-perturbative effects in large N gauge theories, matrix models and strings , Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 455–540, arXiv:1206.6272 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Aniceto, J

    I. Aniceto, J. G. Russo, and R. Schiappa, Resurgent Analysis of Localiz- able Observables in Supersymmetric Gauge Theories , JHEP 03 (2015) 172, arXiv:1410.5834 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Dorigoni, An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus, Annals 32 Phys

    D. Dorigoni, An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus, Annals 32 Phys. 409 (2019) 167914, arXiv:1411.3585 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Sauzin, Introduction to 1-summability and resurgence, arXiv:1405.0356 [math.DS]

    D. Sauzin, Introduction to 1-summability and resurgence, arXiv:1405.0356 [math.DS]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    P. F. Byrd and M. D. Friedman, Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1971. 33

    1971

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.