Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 103 references

On the Field Theoretical Description of an Alternative Model to Generalized Chaplygin Gas and its Thermodynamic Behaviour

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A fluid with a sinc equation of state is claimed to match cosmological data as well as ΛCDM while also admitting scalar-field and thermodynamic descriptions.

desk verdict The scalar-field reconstructions are new and traceable, but the paper's observational and thermodynamic conclusions rest on an invalid truncation and a misreported model comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12200 v2 pith:SO3ZTEU5 submitted 2024-12-14 gr-qc hep-th

Tamal Mukhopadhyay , Banadipa Chakraborty , Ujjal Debnath , Anirudh Pradhan This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83F0580A10 PACS 98.80.-k95.36.+x
keywords darkenergyGeneralizedChaplyginGassincequationofstatequintessencek-essenceDBI-essencesecondlawHubbletension
topics Dark EnergyThe Hubble Tension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a dark-energy fluid whose pressure is $p=-\rho+\rho\,\mathrm{sinc}(\mu\pi\rho_0/\rho)$, a modification of the Chaplygin equation of state. It aims to show that this sinc fluid is a physically grounded alternative to the generalized Chaplygin gas and to ΛCDM: it can be reconstructed from quintessence, k-essence, and DBI-essence scalar fields; it obeys the main energy conditions except the expected late-time strong-energy violation; it is classically and thermodynamically stable; and it fits CC+BAO, Pantheon+SH0ES, and Union2.1 data with information-criterion scores close to those of ΛCDM. If right, the model would offer a single-fluid description of the dark sector that reproduces the late-time acceleration of the universe and yields $H_0$ values closer to CMB-based estimates than to local distance-ladder estimates, easing the Hubble tension.

What carries the argument

The central object is the equation of state $p=-\rho+\rho\,\mathrm{sinc}(\mu\pi\rho_0/\rho)$, where $\mathrm{sinc}(x)=\sin x/x$ and $\mu$ is a tuning parameter. It reduces to dust at early times and to a Chaplygin-like negative pressure near $\rho\approx\rho_0$. The argument is carried by the conserved density $\rho=(\mu\pi\rho_0/2)\arctan(a^3\tan(\mu\pi/2))$ and, in the thermodynamic and observational sections, by the first-order approximation $\rho\approx\mu\rho_0[1+(1/\pi)(V_0/V)]$ obtained by truncating $\cot^{-1}(V_0/V)$. This approximate relation feeds the pressure, equation-of-state parameter, speed of sound, deceleration parameter, entropy and temperature expressions, the generalized-second-law analysis, and the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ used in the MCMC fits.

What would settle it

Take the exact density $\rho=(\mu\pi\rho_0)^2\cot^{-1}(V_0/V)$ and the unexpanded pressure, insert them into the Friedmann equation for $H(z)$ with the paper's best-fit parameters, and compare with the CC and BAO points at $z>1$; if the exact curve leaves the quoted $1\sigma$ bands, the claimed fits are an artifact of the truncated expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the sinc equation of state $p=-\rho+\rho\,\mathrm{sinc}(\mu\pi\rho_0/\rho)$ is a viable alternative to the generalized Chaplygin gas. Beginning from the conservation equation, it derives $\rho=(\mu\pi\rho_0/2)\arctan(a^3\tan(\mu\pi/2))$, and from this it reconstructs explicit scalar-field potentials and kinetic terms for quintessence, k-essence, and DBI-essence, with both constant and variable $\gamma$, finding parameter-dependent analyticity constraints such as $\mu\neq 2m+1$. Thermodynamically, the model gives positive squared sound speed and heat capacity, a second-order phase transition at $T_c\approx 5.07\times10^{-6}$ in Gibbs free energy, and a temperature-redshift profile matching CMB temperature measurements with $\chi^2/\mathrm{dof}=0.7$. The generalized second law is satisfied at the apparent horizon throughout the redshift range but violated at the cosmological event horizon during early epochs. Fits to CC+BAO, Pantheon+SH0ES, and Union2.1 yield best-fit $H_0$ values around $69$ km/s/Mpc, and the information-criterion differences with respect to ΛCDM are roughly 6-13 for AIC and BIC but near zero for DIC.

Load-bearing premise

Everything in the thermodynamic, entropy, and observational sections assumes the first-order expansion $\rho\approx\mu\rho_0[1+(1/\pi)(V_0/V)]$ holds at all redshifts and volumes used, even though it is only accurate for $V\gg V_0$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, the same fluid can account for the matter-to-dark-energy transition without a separate cosmological constant: its equation of state evolves from $p\approx 0$ at early times to $p\approx -\mu\rho_0$ at late times.
  • The reconstructed quintessence, k-essence, and DBI-essence potentials provide concrete Lagrangians whose dynamics could be tested in perturbation theory and in early-universe observables.
  • The model's fitted $H_0$ values around $69$ km/s/Mpc sit between the CMB-based and local distance-ladder values, so if confirmed it would ease the Hubble tension without invoking new early-universe physics.
  • Because $\omega$, $q$, and $v_s^2$ are independent of $\mu$ in this model, its late-time phenomenology is controlled mainly by $V_0$ and $H_0$, so datasets that pin down these parameters distinguish it from ΛCDM.
  • The generalized second law holds at the apparent horizon but not the event horizon, implying that thermodynamic consistency of the model depends on which horizon defines the boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's high-redshift conclusions rest on the first-order expansion of $\cot^{-1}(V_0/V)$; replacing it with the exact $\rho=(\mu\pi\rho_0)^2\cot^{-1}(V_0/V)$ in the $H(z)$ likelihood would show whether the claimed CC+BAO fits survive at $z\gtrsim 1$.
  • A natural outgrowth is to compute the full linear perturbation sound speed and growth rate from the reconstructed scalar-field Lagrangians, which the paper does not do; those predictions could be compared with redshift-space distortion data.
  • The apparent-horizon versus event-horizon split suggests that entropy bounds for this fluid depend on causal boundary choice, and a similar analysis for a trapped or dynamical horizon could connect the model to black-hole thermodynamics.
  • If recent hints of evolving dark energy harden, the sinc fluid's time-varying $\omega(z)$ at low redshift gives a concrete phenomenology to fit against those measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 'sinc-fluid' dark-energy model proposed by Hova and Yang, with equation of state p = -ρ + ρ² sin(µπρ0/ρ)/(µπρ0). It reconstructs scalar-field descriptions (quintessence, k-essence, DBI-essence), performs a thermodynamic analysis that claims a second-order phase transition, tests the generalized second law at apparent and event horizons, and fits the model to CC, BAO, Pantheon+SH0ES, and Union 2.1 data. The central advertised conclusions are that the model is observationally viable, reproduces late-time acceleration, and is a compelling alternative to ΛCDM.

Significance. The scalar-field reconstruction in Section 3 is a useful formal exercise, and the MCMC pipeline is standard in structure. However, the paper's central observational and thermodynamic claims are not supported by the reported calculations. The large-volume expansion that underlies the Hubble fits and the GSL analysis is used outside its regime of validity, the model-comparison statistics in Table 4 contradict the claim that the model is competitive with ΛCDM, and the claimed phase transition is generated by hand-inserted entropy dependence and chosen constants rather than derived from the equation of state. If the field-theory correspondence were the sole contribution, the paper would be a modest formal result; as presented, the advertised cosmological conclusions are not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (48)] Equation (48) is not the first-order expansion of Eq. (47). Since cot⁻¹(x) = π/2 − x + O(x³) for small x, Eq. (47) gives ρ = µπ²ρ0/4 − µπρ0V0/(2V) + O((V0/V)³), whose large-volume limit is µπ²ρ0/4, not µρ0; no truncation of Eq. (47) yields µρ0[1 + V0/(πV)]. Because Eq. (48) is the basis for the pressure in Eq. (49), the sound speed in Eq. (53), the temperature in Eq. (62), and the Hubble parameter in Eq. (99), this algebraic error undermines the thermodynamic and observational sections that follow.
  2. [Section 6.1, Eq. (99) and Section 5, Eq. (98)] Even if Eq. (48) were a valid large-volume truncation, it is used in Eq. (99) at redshifts where V0/V is not small. With V = a³ = (1+z)⁻³ and the best-fit values V0 ≈ 0.6–1.0 from Table 3, the expansion parameter V0(1+z)³/π is of order 12–24 at z ≈ 2, so the first-order series fails over most of the CC/BAO and supernova redshift range. The MCMC constraints and the apparent-horizon GSL check in Eq. (98) therefore fit and test an approximate density that is not the model's actual density in the fitted epoch, invalidating the claimed observational agreement and the GSL conclusion.
  3. [Section 6.2, Table 4 and Conclusions] Table 4 shows that the proposed model has larger AIC, BIC, and DIC than ΛCDM for all three datasets, with ΔBIC ≈ 12.9, 10.9, and 12.1. By the paper's own criterion in Section 6.1.4, ΔIC ≥ 10 indicates 'substantial model incompatibility'. The text in Section 6.2 and the Conclusions nevertheless states that the differences are not statistically significant and that the model is competitive, which is an internal contradiction that directly undermines the abstract's claim of a compelling alternative to ΛCDM.
  4. [Section 4, Eqs. (55)–(57) and Fig. 13] The claimed second-order phase transition is not a prediction from the equation of state. The entropy-dependent constant C = τS^(ν−2) is introduced in Eq. (57) by dimensional analysis, and the free constants τ, ν, along with S = 13745.30 and µ = 0.88, are then chosen so that the Gibbs free energy crosses zero at T ≈ 5.07 × 10⁻⁶. No independent derivation fixes these values, so the phase-transition temperature and the transition order are imposed by the chosen constants rather than derived from the fluid model, making the thermodynamic conclusion circular.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, after Eq. (50)] The text states that at large volume the equation-of-state parameter tends to −1 − 1/π, but taking the large-V limit of Eq. (50) gives ω → −1; the later sentence in the same paragraph also says ω → −1. Please correct this inconsistency.
  2. [Throughout, especially Section 1] The name 'Hova' is misspelled as 'Hoava' in several places, and there are numerous typographical errors such as 'the the', 'potetial', and 'SHOES' for SH0ES.
  3. [Section 6.1] The MCMC description states that uniform priors were used 'within physically motivated bounds', but the prior ranges for H0, Ωm0, ωm, µ, and V0 are not specified; without these ranges the reported posterior constraints are not reproducible.
  4. [Section 6.1.2, Eq. (106)] The calibration of absolute magnitude uses the low-redshift approximation dL(z) ≈ z(1+z/2)c/H0, but it is applied to the full Pantheon+SH0ES redshift range; this approximation should be justified or replaced with the exact luminosity distance.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The thermodynamic phase transition is an input dressed as an output: the Gibbs-free-energy crossing temperature is fixed by the freely chosen C(S)=τS^(ν−2), S=13745.30, and µ=0.88, so the claimed 'critical transition' reduces to those constants. The scalar-field correspondences and MCMC fits are not circular, though the latter rest on an uncontrolled approximation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, Eqs. (55)-(59) and the Figure 13 discussion]
    "Now, by performing dimensional analysis of eq. (56) and using the relation U = T S we have obtained, C = τ S^{ν−2}. ... The phase boundary occurs at T ≈ 5.07 × 10−6, where the Gibbs free energy crosses zero. ... The entropy parameter S = 13745.30 with µ = 0.88 characterizes the microscopic degrees of freedom of the dark energy fluid."

    The temperature T(S) (Eq. (59)) is obtained from U ≈ πCµρ0V^2/6 with C(S)=τS^(ν−2); τ, ν, S, and µ are free inputs. The paper gives no independent derivation or observational constraint fixing S=13745.30 and µ=0.88. Since the location where the Gibbs free energy crosses zero is a function of these parameters, the reported phase transition at T≈5.07×10^-6 is not a consequence of the equation of state (1) but a restatement of the chosen constants. The 'prediction' of a critical transition is therefore enforced by construction rather than derived.

full rationale

The scalar-field constructions in Section 3 are explicit correspondences: the field and potential are reconstructed by equating ρ_ϕ and p_ϕ with the fluid densities, so they are not independent predictions, but they are also not circular because the mapping is transparent and the paper does not claim to derive the EoS from microphysics. The observational MCMC analysis is standard parameter estimation rather than circularity: µ and V0 are fitted to CC/BAO/SN data and the resulting H(z) and distance moduli are compared with the same data; this is better described as a fit than a prediction, but it is not the 'fitted input renamed as prediction' pattern unless the same data are used twice. However, the thermodynamic centerpiece is different. The arbitrary choice C(S)=τS^(ν−2), with S=13745.30 and µ=0.88 fixed by hand, completely determines T(S) and the Gibbs free energy curve; the 'revealed' phase transition at T≈5.07×10^-6 is therefore equivalent to those inputs. A separate, non-circularity concern is that Eq. (48), used in the Hubble fits and the GSL check, is not a valid first-order expansion of Eq. (47), so the observational and thermodynamic results based on it do not follow from the stated model; that is a correctness risk, not a circularity. The paper's own Table 4 shows ΔBIC > 10 for all datasets, which its §6.1.4 labels 'substantial incompatibility', contradicting the 'competitive' conclusion; that is an internal inconsistency, not circularity. Because the central thermodynamic claim reduces by construction to chosen constants, the score is 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces several fitted or hand-chosen parameters. The central cosmological fit uses H0, Ωm0, ωm, µ, and V0, with ωm allowed to deviate from 0. The thermodynamic phase transition relies on an ad hoc entropy dependence C = τS^(ν-2) and a hand-set value S = 13745.30, so the predicted transition temperature is not an independent prediction. The first-order expansion of the cot^-1 term is assumed valid globally, which is a strong modeling assumption.

free parameters (8)
  • H0 = 68.882-69.647 km/s/Mpc
    Present-day Hubble parameter fitted by MCMC; standard cosmological parameter.
  • Ωm0 = 0.237-0.290
    Present-day matter density parameter fitted by MCMC.
  • ωm = -0.067 to 0.057
    Matter equation of state fitted as a free parameter, allowing non-dust exotic matter.
  • µ = 0.841-0.865
    Dimensionless parameter in the sinc EoS, fitted by MCMC and also taken from prior literature.
  • V0 = 0.607-1.028
    Integration constant in the cot^-1 expansion of the energy density, fitted by MCMC.
  • τ = unspecified (dimension of temperature)
    Constant introduced in C = τ S^(ν-2) by dimensional analysis; value not given.
  • ν = unspecified (dimension of volume)
    Exponent in C = τ S^(ν-2); value not given and no physical basis supplied.
  • S = 13745.30
    Entropy value chosen to place the claimed phase transition in the Gibbs free energy plot.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Flat FLRW background with Friedmann equations (3)-(4) and separate conservation equations for matter and dark energy (5)-(6).
    Standard cosmological background used throughout the model and data fits.
  • standard math Thermodynamic relation (∂U/∂V)_T = -P and the first-law integrability condition (68) hold for the fluid.
    Standard statistical physics, attributed to Landau-Lifshitz [59]; used to derive internal energy and temperature.
  • ad hoc to paper At least one thermodynamic parameter, C, must depend on entropy S; specifically C = τ S^(ν-2).
    The paper states this is necessary to avoid zero temperature and third-law violation, then imposes the power-law by dimensional analysis without independent input.
  • ad hoc to paper The first-order approximation ρ ≈ µρ0(1 + V0/(πV)) is valid over the whole redshift range.
    Truncated cot^-1 expansion, used globally in H(z) (Eq. 99), GSL, and temperature profile.
  • domain assumption Kodama-Hayward temperature (97) and GSL formulas (88)-(90) apply to apparent and event horizons.
    Standard horizon thermodynamics used in Section 5.
  • ad hoc to paper MCMC uses uniform priors within physically motivated bounds; prior ranges are not specified.
    Section 6.1 states uniform priors but gives no bounds, so the posterior is not fully reproducible.
invented entities (1)
  • Entropy-dependent constant C(S) = τ S^(ν-2) introduced in the internal energy expression
    purpose: To avoid the paper's identified third-law problem and to produce a nonzero temperature and the claimed second-order phase transition.
    No independent physical motivation; τ, ν, and S are free or arbitrary, and the critical temperature follows from their choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Field Theoretical Description of an Alternative Model to Generalized Chaplygin Gas and its Thermodynamic Behaviour." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SO3ZTEU5

@misc{pith2026241212200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Field Theoretical Description of an Alternative Model to Generalized Chaplygin Gas and its Thermodynamic Behaviour},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SO3ZTEU5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12200}
}
abstract

This paper investigates a newly proposed fluid description of dark energy within the framework of the late-time accelerated expansion of the universe. Our primary objective is to explore the theoretical foundation of the proposed equation of state by establishing its correspondence with well-known scalar field models such as quintessence, k-essence, and DBI-essence. Through this correspondence, we reconstruct key field parameters, including the scalar field $\phi$ and scalar potential $V(\phi)$, and analyze their evolutionary behavior across cosmic time. The study also evaluates the model's physical consistency and cosmological implications by examining fundamental energy conditions - Null Energy Condition (NEC), Dominant Energy Condition (DEC), and Strong Energy Condition (SEC). Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive stability analysis to ensure the robustness of the model and investigate its thermodynamic properties, including possible phase transitions using entropy and Gibbs free energy. To assess the observational viability of the model, we compare its predictions against recent datasets, including Cosmic Chronometers (CC), Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO), and Supernova Type Ia from the Pantheon+SH0ES compilation and Union 2.1, as well as recent DESI and DESY5 data. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed fluid model aligns well with observational constraints, reproduces the late-time acceleration of the universe, and offers a compelling alternative to the standard $\Lambda$-CDM model while maintaining consistency with current data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12200 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Here, in the first plot we can see that the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Here, in the first plot we can see that the scalar potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Plot of ϕ˙2 and ϕ against the scale factor a(t). Here, D is an arbitrary integration constant. Now, the above equation coupled with the eq. (24) will give us the expressions of F(X) and ϕ. But, due to complexity of the equations, we solved them numerically and presented in the following figure 3 and 4. In the fig. 3 it is readily evident that the time derivative of the scalar field ϕ˙2 is decreasing with the scale f… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (18 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of variation of F(X) vs X and F(X) vs scale factor a(t) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 3D Plot of variation of F(X) against X and scale factor a(t). 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Here in this figure. (a) it is seen that the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Here in this figure. (a) it is seen that the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Here, the two figures show the similar type of behaviour with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Here, the first plot shows the energy density is positive throughout the evolution and tends to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Here, the first plot shows that the EoS parameter is negative and tends to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Here, the first plot shows that the square speed of sound is positive throughout the expansion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Plot of the variation of Temperature against Entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Plot of Gibbs Free Energy with the Temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Here, the variation of the first plot shows that the specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Plot of temperature evolution as seen from the CMBR observations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Here in this figure. (a) it is seen that the GSL is violated at the cosmological event horizon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Posterior distribution of the MCMC analysis for the theoretical model at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Here in this figure. (a) it is seen that the Hubble parameter obtained from the theoretical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Here in this figure, the distance modulus, apparent magnitude, absolute magnitude perfectly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Here in this figure. (a) The total density parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Study of the different energy conditions such as Strong Energy Condition, Null Energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_21.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess, et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, The Astronomical Journal 116 (3) (1998) 1009.doi:10.1086/300499. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/300499

    doi:10.1086/300499 1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter, et al., Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the universe, Nature 391 (6662) (1998) 51–54.doi:10.1038/34124

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the universe, Nature 391 (6662) (1998) 51–54.doi:10.1038/34124. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/34124

    doi:10.1038/34124 1998

  3. [3]

    Perlmutter, et al., Measurements ofΩ and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae, The Astrophysical Journal 517 (2) (1999) 565.doi:10.1086/307221

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Measurements ofΩ and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae, The Astrophysical Journal 517 (2) (1999) 565.doi:10.1086/307221. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/307221

    doi:10.1086/307221 1999

  4. [4]

    coincidence problem

    H. E. S. Velten, R. F. vom Marttens, W. Zimdahl, Aspects of the cosmological “coincidence problem”, The European Physical Journal C 74 (11) (Nov. 2014).doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3160-4. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3160-4

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3160-4 2014

  5. [5]

    J. YOO, Y. WATANABE, Theoretical models of dark energy, International Journal of Modern Physics D 21 (12) (2012) 1230002.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271812300029, doi: 10.1142/S0218271812300029. URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271812300029

    doi:10.1142/s0218271812300029 2012

  6. [6]

    Weinberg, The cosmological constant problems, in: D

    S. Weinberg, The cosmological constant problems, in: D. B. Cline (Ed.), Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001, pp. 18–26. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04587-9_2

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04587-9_2 2001

  7. [7]

    Constant

    P. J. E. Peebles, B. Ratra, Cosmology with a Time-Variable Cosmological “Constant”, apjl 325 (1988) L17. doi:10.1086/185100

    doi:10.1086/185100 1988

  8. [8]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state, Physical Review Letters 80 (8) (1998) 1582–1585.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80. 1582. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80 1998

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    Zlatev, L

    I. Zlatev, L. Wang, P. J. Steinhardt, Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 896–899.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.896. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.896

    1999 doi

  2. [10]

    S. M. Carroll, Quintessence and the rest of the world: Suppressing long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 3067–3070.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3067. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3067

    1998 doi

  3. [11]

    Tsujikawa, Quintessence: a review, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30 (21) (2013) 214003

    S. Tsujikawa, Quintessence: a review, Classical and Quantum Gravity 30 (21) (2013) 214003. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214003. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214003

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, P. J. Steinhardt, Essentials of k-essence, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 103510. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.103510. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.103510 41

    2001 doi

  5. [14]

    Chakraborty, S

    G. Chakraborty, S. Chattopadhyay, Investigating inflation driven by dbi-essence scalar field, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics D 29 (12) (2020) 2050087.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/ S021827182050087X, doi:10.1142/S021827182050087X. URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S021827...

    2020 doi

  6. [15]

    Debnath, S

    U. Debnath, S. Chakraborty, S. Maity, A. Pradhan, Study of anisotropic universe in pres- ence of dbi-essence, phantom and tachyonic fields, International Journal of Modern Physics A 37 (36) (2022) 2250198. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X22501986, doi:10.1142/ S0217751X...

    2022 doi

  7. [16]

    Chattopadhyay, U

    S. Chattopadhyay, U. Debnath, Interaction between dbi-essence and other dark energies, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 49 (7) (2010) 1465–1480.doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0328-z. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-010-0328-z

    2010 doi

  8. [17]

    A. D. Rendall, Dynamics of k-essence, Classical and Quantum Gravity 23 (5) (2006) 1557.doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/23/5/008. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/5/008

    2006 doi

  9. [18]

    Bandyopadhyay, D

    A. Bandyopadhyay, D. Gangopadhyay, A. Moulik, The k-essence scalar field in the context of supernova ia observations, The European Physical Journal C 72 (2012) 1–8.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1943-z

    2012 doi

  10. [19]

    Gangopadhyay, Estimating temperature fluctuations in the early universe, Gravitation and Cosmology 16 (3) (2010) 231–238.doi:10.1134/s0202289310030072

    D. Gangopadhyay, Estimating temperature fluctuations in the early universe, Gravitation and Cosmology 16 (3) (2010) 231–238.doi:10.1134/s0202289310030072. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0202289310030072

    2010 doi

  11. [20]

    Panda, D

    A. Panda, D. Gangopadhyay, G. Manna, Nec violation in f(r¯,t¯) gravity in the context of a non- canonical theory via modified raychaudhuri equation, Astroparticle Physics 165 (2025) 103059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2024.103059. URL https://www.sciencedirect....

    2025

  12. [21]

    Kamenshchik, U

    A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, V. Pasquier, An alternative to quintessence, Physics Letters B 511 (2–4) (2001) 265–268.doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(01)00571-8. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00571-8

    2001 doi

  13. [22]

    GORINI, A

    V. GORINI, A. KAMENSHCHIK, U. MOSCHELLA, V. PASQUIER, The chaplygin gas as a model for dark energy, in: The Tenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2006, p. 840–859. doi:10.1142/9789812704030_0050. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812704030_0050

    2006 doi

  14. [23]

    M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, A. A. Sen, Generalized chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy-matter unification, Physical Review D 66 (4) (Aug. 2002).doi:10.1103/physrevd.66. 043507. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043507

    2002 doi

  15. [24]

    H. B. Benaoum, Modified chaplygin gas cosmology, Advances in High Energy Physics 2012 (1) (2012) 357802. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2012/357802, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/357802. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1155/2012/357802

    2012 doi

  16. [25]

    Panigrahi, S

    D. Panigrahi, S. Chatterjee, Thermodynamics of the variable modified chaplygin gas, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (05) (2016) 052–052.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/ 05/052. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/052 42

    2016 doi

  17. [26]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, Inhomogeneous equation of state of the universe: Phantom era, future singularity, and crossing the phantom barrier, Physical Review D 72 (2) (Jul. 2005).doi:10.1103/ physrevd.72.023003. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.023003

    2005 doi

  18. [27]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, Final state and thermodynamics of a dark energy universe, Physical Review D 70 (10) (Nov. 2004).doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.103522. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.103522

    2004 doi

  19. [28]

    Štefančić, Expansion around the vacuum equation of state: Sudden future singularities and asymptotic behavior, Physical Review D 71 (8) (Apr

    H. Štefančić, Expansion around the vacuum equation of state: Sudden future singularities and asymptotic behavior, Physical Review D 71 (8) (Apr. 2005).doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.084024. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.084024

    2005 doi

  20. [29]

    Jacobson, Thermodynamics of spacetime: The einstein equation of state, Phys

    T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of spacetime: The einstein equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1260–1263. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260

    1995 doi

  21. [30]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333–2346. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.7.2333. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

    1973 doi

  22. [31]

    Verlinde, On the holographic principle in a radiation dominated universe (2000).arXiv:hep-th/ 0008140

    E. Verlinde, On the holographic principle in a radiation dominated universe (2000).arXiv:hep-th/ 0008140. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0008140

    2000 arXiv

  23. [32]

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738–2751.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738

    1977 doi

  24. [33]

    Y. Gong, B. Wang, A. Wang, Thermodynamical properties of the universe with dark energy, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2007 (01) (2007) 024–024.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/ 01/024. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/024

    2007 doi

  25. [34]

    B. Wang, Y. Gong, E. Abdalla, Thermodynamics of an accelerated expanding universe, Physical Review D 74 (8) (Oct. 2006).doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.083520. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083520

    2006 doi

  26. [35]

    Y. S. Myung, Thermodynamics of chaplygin gas, Astrophysics and Space Science 335 (2) (2011) 561–564. doi:10.1007/s10509-011-0743-5. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-011-0743-5

    2011 doi

  27. [36]

    Santos, M

    F. Santos, M. Bedran, V. Soares, On the thermodynamic stability of the generalized chaplygin gas, Physics Letters B 636 (2) (2006) 86–90.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.03.042. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037026930600373X

    2006 doi

  28. [37]

    Debnath, A

    U. Debnath, A. Banerjee, S. Chakraborty, Role of modified chaplygin gas in accelerated universe, Classical and Quantum Gravity 21 (23) (2004) 5609–5617.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/23/019. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/23/019

    2004 doi

  29. [38]

    BANDYOPADHYAY, S

    T. BANDYOPADHYAY, S. CHAKRABORTY, The laws of thermodynamics and thermodynamic stability of the modified chaplygin gas, Modern Physics Letters A 25 (32) (2010) 2779–2793. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732310034171, doi:10.1142/S0217732310034171. URL https://doi.org/10.114...

    2010 doi

  30. [39]

    Santos, M

    F. Santos, M. Bedran, V. Soares, On the thermodynamic stability of the modified chaplygin gas, Physics Letters B 646 (5) (2007) 215–221.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01. 038. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269307001438 43

    2007 doi

  31. [41]

    Chakraborty, T

    B. Chakraborty, T. Mukhopadhyay, D. Mondal, U. Debnath, Thermodynamics of modified chaplygin- jacobi gas and modified chaplygin-abel gas: Stability analysis and observational constraints, Nuclear Physics B 1010 (2025) 116770.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116770....

    2025

  32. [42]

    S. D. Odintsov, T. Paul, S. SenGupta, Landauer principle in cosmology as the link to information theory (2024). arXiv:2409.05009. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05009

    2024 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Izquierdo, D

    G. Izquierdo, D. Pavón, Dark energy and the generalized second law, Physics Letters B 633 (4–5) (2006) 420–426. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.12.040. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.12.040

    2006 doi

  34. [45]

    H. Hova, H. Yang, A dark energy model alternative to generalized chaplygin gas, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics D 27 (01) (2018) 1750178.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271817501784, doi:10.1142/S0218271817501784. URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271817501784

    2018 doi

  35. [46]

    V. M. C. Ferreira, P. P. Avelino, Extended family of generalized chaplygin gas models, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 043515. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043515. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043515

    2018 doi

  36. [47]

    P. RUDRA, Role of generalized cosmic chaplygin gas in accelerating universe: A field theoretical prescription, Modern Physics Letters A 28 (22) (2013) 1350102.doi:10.1142/s0217732313501022. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217732313501022

    2013 doi

  37. [48]

    Sharif, K

    M. Sharif, K. Yesmakhanova, S. Rani, R. Myrzakulov, Solvable k-essence cosmologies and modified chaplygin gas unified models of dark energy and dark matter, The European Physical Journal C 72 (2012) 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2067-1

    2012 doi

  38. [49]

    Debnath, M

    U. Debnath, M. Jamil, Correspondence between dbi-essence and modified chaplygin gas and the generalized second law of thermodynamics, Astrophysics and Space Science 335 (2) (2011) 545–552. doi:10.1007/s10509-011-0749-z. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-011-0749-z

    2011 doi

  39. [50]

    Peloso, E

    M. Peloso, E. Poppitz, Quintessence from shape moduli, Physical Review D 68 (12) (Dec. 2003). doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.125009. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.125009

    2003 doi

  40. [51]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Y. Huang, The dark energy properties of the dirac–born–infeld action, Entropy 14 (7) (2012) 1203–1220.doi:10.3390/e14071203. URL https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/14/7/1203

    2012 doi

  41. [52]

    Kohri, H

    K. Kohri, H. Matsui, Cosmological constant problem and renormalized vacuum energy density in curved background, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (06) (2017) 006–006. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/006. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/006

    2017 doi

  42. [53]

    Hernandez-Almada, J

    A. Hernandez-Almada, J. Magaña, M. A. García-Aspeitia, V. Motta, Cosmological constraints on alternative model to chaplygin fluid revisited, The European Physical Journal C 79 (2019) 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6521-6. 44

    2019 doi

  43. [54]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, A. Paliathanasis, S. Ghosh, Y. Wu, Observational constraints of a new unified dark fluid and the h0 tension, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (2) (2019) 2071–

    2019

  44. [55]

    J. A. Minahan, B. Zwiebach, Field theory models for tachyon and gauge field string dynamics, Journal of High Energy Physics 2000 (09) (2000) 029.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/09/029. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2000/09/029

    2000 doi

  45. [56]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, V. Pasquier, Tachyons, scalar fields, and cosmology, Physical Review D 69 (12) (Jun. 2004).doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.123512. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.123512

    2004 doi

  46. [57]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, P. J. Steinhardt, Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late-time cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 4438–4441. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438

    2000 doi

  47. [58]

    Myrzakulov, Cosmological models with non-canonical scalar and fermion fields: k-essence, f- essence and g-essence (2016).arXiv:1011.4337

    R. Myrzakulov, Cosmological models with non-canonical scalar and fermion fields: k-essence, f- essence and g-essence (2016).arXiv:1011.4337. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4337

    2016 arXiv

  48. [59]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, E. Lifshit-s-, L. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics: Theory of the Condensed State, Course of theoretical physics, Elsevier Science, 1980. URL https://books.google.co.in/books?id=NaB7oAkon9MC

    1980

  49. [60]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Guha, D. Panigrahi, Evolution of frw universe in variable modified chaplygin gas model (2019). arXiv:1906.12185. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.12185

    2019 arXiv

  50. [61]

    Bedran, V

    M. Bedran, V. Soares, M. Araújo, Temperature evolution of the frw universe filled with modi- fied chaplygin gas, Physics Letters B 659 (3) (2008) 462–465.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2007.11.076. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269307014700

    2008 doi

  51. [62]

    Maartens, Causal thermodynamics in relativity (1996).arXiv:astro-ph/9609119

    R. Maartens, Causal thermodynamics in relativity (1996).arXiv:astro-ph/9609119. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609119

    1996 arXiv

  52. [63]

    Songaila, L

    A. Songaila, L. Cowie, S. Vogt, M. Keane, A. Wolfei, E. Hu, A. Oren, D.-R. Tytleri, K. Lanzetta, Measurement of the microwave background temperature at a redshift of 1.776, Nature 371 (6492) (1994) 43–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/371043a0

    1994 doi

  53. [64]

    J. C. Mather, D. J. Fixsen, R. A. Shafer, C. Mosier, D. T. Wilkinson, Calibrator design for the cobe* far infrared absolute spectrophotometer (firas), The Astrophysical Journal 512 (2) (1999) 511. doi:10.1086/306805. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/306805

    1999 doi

  54. [65]

    J. A. S. Lima, A. I. Silva, S. M. Viegas, Is the radiation temperature-redshift relation of the standard cosmology in accordance with the data?, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 312 (4) (2000) 747–752. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/312/4/747...

    2000

  55. [66]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809727 45

    Srianand, R., Noterdaeme, P., Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., First detection of co in a high-redshift damped lyman-α system*, A&A 482 (3) (2008) L39–L42.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809727. URL https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809727 45

    2008 doi

  56. [67]

    J. Ge, J. Bechtold, J. H. Black, A new measurement of the cosmic microwave background radiation temperature at z = 1.97*, The Astrophysical Journal 474 (1) (1997) 67.doi:10.1086/303426. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/303426

    1997 doi

  57. [68]

    D., A translucent interstellar cloud at z=2.69 - co, h2, and hd in the line-of-sight to sdssj123714.60 + 064759.5⋆, A&A 523 (2010) A80.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015147

    Noterdaeme, P., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., López, S., Srianand, R., Vergani, S. D., A translucent interstellar cloud at z=2.69 - co, h2, and hd in the line-of-sight to sdssj123714.60 + 064759.5⋆, A&A 523 (2010) A80.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015147. URL https://doi.org/10.1051/0...

    2010 doi

  58. [69]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016140

    Noterdaeme, P., Petitjean, P., Srianand, R., Ledoux, C., López, S., The evolution of the cosmic microwave background temperature⋆ - measurements of tcmb at high redshift from carbon monoxide excitation, A&A 526 (2011) L7.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016140. URL https://doi.org/10....

    2011 doi

  59. [70]

    R.-G. Cai, S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynamics and friedmann equations of friedmann-robertson- walker universe, Journal of High Energy Physics 2005 (02) (2005) 050.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 2005/02/050. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/050

    2005 doi

  60. [71]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Guha, Thermodynamics of frw universe with chaplygin gas models, General Relativity and Gravitation 51 (11) (Nov. 2019).doi:10.1007/s10714-019-2645-8. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-019-2645-8

    2019 doi

  61. [72]

    H. M. Sadjadi, M. Jamil, Generalized second law of thermodynamics for frw cosmology with logarithmiccorrection, EurophysicsLetters92(6)(2011)69001. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/92/69001. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/92/69001

    2011 doi

  62. [73]

    Binétruy, A

    P. Binétruy, A. Helou, The apparent universe, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32 (20) (2015) 205006. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/20/205006. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/20/205006

    2015 doi

  63. [74]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. Hogg, D. Lang, J. Goodman, Emcee: The mcmc hammer, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125 (925) (2013) 306–312.doi:10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  64. [75]

    Stern, R

    D. Stern, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, M. Kamionkowski, S. A. Stanford, Cosmic chronometers: constraining the equation of state of dark energy. i: H(z) measurements, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010 (02) (2010) 008.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/02/008. URL https://dx....

    2010 doi

  65. [76]

    Moresco, L

    M. Moresco, L. Verde, L. Pozzetti, R. Jimenez, A. Cimatti, New constraints on cosmological parameters and neutrino properties using the expansion rate of the universe toz ∼ 1.75, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (07) (2012) 053.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/...

    2012 doi

  66. [77]

    M. Moresco, et al., Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the universe up toz ∼ 1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (08) (2012) 006.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/006. URL https://dx.doi.org/10...

    2012 doi

  67. [78]

    Zhang, H

    C. Zhang, H. Zhang, S. Yuan, S. Liu, T.-J. Zhang, Y.-C. Sun, Four new observational h (z) data from luminous red galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey data release seven, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 14 (10) (2014) 1221.doi:10.1088/1674-4527/14/10/002. URL https:/...

    2014 doi

  68. [79]

    M. Moresco, Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronome- ters at z ∼ 2, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 450 (1) (2015) L16–L20. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article-pdf/450/1/L16/54653923/ mnrasl\_450\_1\_l1...

    2015 doi

  69. [80]

    M. Moresco, et al., A 6% measurement of the hubble parameter atz ∼ 0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (05) (2016)

    2016

  70. [81]

    A. J. Ross, et al., The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (1) (2015) 835–

    2015

  71. [82]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014

    2016 doi

  72. [83]

    H. Gil-Marín, et al., The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0, Monthly Notices of the Royal A...

    2020 doi

  73. [84]

    A. Raichoor, et al., The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: large-scale structure catalogues and measurement of the isotropic BAO between redshift 0.6 and 1.1 for the Emission Line Galaxy Sample, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societ...

    2020 doi

  74. [85]

    S. Alam, et al., The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (3) (2017) 2617–2652.arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/mnras/artic...

    2017 doi

  75. [86]

    H. du Mas des Bourboux, et al., The completed sdss-iv extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Baryon acoustic oscillations with lyα forests, The Astrophysical Journal 901 (2) (2020) 153. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb085. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb085

    2020 doi

  76. [87]

    T. M. C. Abbott, et al., Dark energy survey year 3 results: A 2.7% measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation distance scale at redshift 0.835, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 043512.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 105.043512. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043512

    2022 doi

  77. [88]

    J. Hou, et al., The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the quasar sample in configuration space between redshift 0.8 and 2.2, mnras 500 (1) (2021) 1201–1221.arXiv:2007.08998, doi:...

    2021 arXiv

  78. [89]

    F. Beutler, et al., The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble con- stant, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 416 (4) (2011) 3017–3032.arXiv:https: //academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/416/4/3017/2985042/mnras0416-3017.pdf, doi:10. ...

    2011

  79. [90]

    D. M. Scolnic, et al., The complete light-curve sample of spectroscopically confirmed sne ia from pan-starrs1 and cosmological constraints from the combined pantheon sample, The Astrophysical Journal 859 (2) (2018) 101.doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.38...

    2018 doi

  80. [91]

    S. Sridhar, et al., Clustering of lrgs in the decals dr8 footprint: Distance constraints from baryon acoustic oscillations using photometric redshifts, The Astrophysical Journal 904 (1) (2020) 69. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc0f0. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc0f0

    2020 doi

  81. [92]

    A. G. Riess, et al., A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the hubble constant with 1 km s−1 mpc−1 uncertainty from the hubble space telescope and the sh0es team, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 934 (1) (2022) L7.doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b. URL https://dx.doi.o...

    2022 doi

  82. [93]

    A. G. Riess, et al., Cosmic distances calibrated to 1% precision with gaia edr3 parallaxes and hubble space telescope photometry of 75 milky way cepheids confirm tension withΛcdm, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 908 (1) (2021) L6.doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf. URL https://dx....

    2021 doi

  83. [94]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a

    D.Scolnic, etal., Thepantheon+analysis: Thefulldatasetandlight-curverelease, TheAstrophysical Journal 938 (2) (2022) 113.doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a

    2022 doi

  84. [95]

    R. Amanullah, et al., Spectra andhubble space telescopelight curves of six type ia supernovae at 0.511 <z< 1.12 and the union2 compilation, The Astrophysical Journal 716 (1) (2010) 712–738. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/712. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/712

    2010 doi

  85. [96]

    F. K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos, E. N. Saridakis, Observational constraints on barrow holo- graphic dark energy, The European Physical Journal C 80 (9) (2020) 826.doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-020-8360-5. URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8360-5

    2020 doi

  86. [97]

    Suzuki, et al., Thehubble space telescopecluster supernova survey

    N. Suzuki, et al., Thehubble space telescopecluster supernova survey. v. improving the dark-energy constraints abovez> 1 and building an early-type-hosted supernova sample, The Astrophysical Journal 746 (1) (2012) 85.doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/1/85. URL http://dx.doi.org/10....

    2012 doi

  87. [99]

    Hinshaw, et al., Nine-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: Cos- mological parameter results, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 208 (2) (2013) 19

    G. Hinshaw, et al., Nine-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: Cos- mological parameter results, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 208 (2) (2013) 19. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    2013 doi

  88. [100]

    Jeffreys, The Theory of Probability, Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences, OUP Oxford, 1998

    H. Jeffreys, The Theory of Probability, Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences, OUP Oxford, 1998. URL https://books.google.co.in/books?id=vh9Act9rtzQC

    1998

  89. [101]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423413

    Betoule, M., et al., Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the sdss-ii and snls supernova samples, A&A 568 (2014) A22.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423413. URL https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423413

    2014 doi

  90. [102]

    cosmological parameters, A&A 641 (2020) A6

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., et al., Planck 2018 results - vi. cosmological parameters, A&A 641 (2020) A6. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. URL https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 48

    2020 doi

  91. [103]

    A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, Large magellanic cloud cepheid standards provide a 1% foundation for the determination of the hubble constant and stronger evidence for physics beyondΛcdm, The Astrophysical Journal 876 (1) (2019) 85.doi:10.3847/ 153...

    2019 doi

  92. [104]

    Huang, R.-G

    L. Huang, R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang, The desi 2024 hint for dynamical dark energy is biased by low-redshift supernovae (2025).arXiv:2502.04212. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04212 49

    2025 arXiv

  93. [106]

    Efstathiou, Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics? (2025).arXiv:2408.07175

    G. Efstathiou, Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics? (2025).arXiv:2408.07175. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07175

    2025 arXiv

  94. [847]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv154

    arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/449/1/835/13767551/stv154.pdf, doi:10.1093/mnras/stv154. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv154

    doi

  95. [2085]

    pdf, doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2753

    arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/490/2/2071/30225465/stz2753. pdf, doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2753. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2753

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.