Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Evidence for a $4$-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ integrable quiver in massive type IIA

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that in a family of four-dimensional N=1 quiver theories dual to massive type IIA, classical string integrability selects exactly one choice of the defining function, the sinusoidal profile, while all linear quivers are…

desk verdict The sinusoidal-quiver integrability claim is new and interesting, but it rests on a background whose validity is unverified; the paper deserves review with major-revision pressure. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12257 v1 pith:DFPRYGFP submitted 2024-12-16 hep-th

José Manuel Penín , Konstantinos C. Rigatos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords classicalintegrabilityN=1quivergaugetheoriesmassivetypeIIAsupergravityAdS/CFTcorrespondenceKovacicalgorithmLiouvillestringchaosLyapunovexponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks which member of a newly discovered family of four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ quiver gauge theories, described holographically by warped $\mathrm{AdS}_5$ backgrounds of massive type IIA supergravity, is classically integrable. The answer it argues for is that exactly one choice of the defining function survives, $\alpha(z) = A\sin(\omega z)$, while every linear quiver, whose defining function $\alpha(z)$ is piecewise cubic, leads to chaotic string motion and is not Liouville integrable. The evidence is twofold: analytically, the normal variational equations for the linear quivers fail the necessary conditions of Kovacic's algorithm, whereas for the sinusoidal choice the $±$ and $\theta_1$ fluctuation equations reduce to constant-coefficient harmonic oscillators; numerically, power spectra, Lyapunov exponents, and Poincaré sections all show chaos for linear quivers and clean regular motion for the sinusoidal one. The authors are careful to state that this is very strong suggestive evidence, not a proof of integrability, and that a Lax connection for the special solution remains unknown. This matters because there is currently only one other four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ theory known to be classically integrable, and the special geometry here points to a simple physical origin: smeared, rather than localised, D8-branes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the defining function $\alpha(z)$, which encodes the whole background. The analytical machinery is the analytic non-integrability method: a closed-string embedding $t=t(\tau)$, $\rho=\rho(\tau)$, $z=z(\tau)$, $\theta_1=\theta_1(\tau)$, $\theta_2=\theta_2(\tau)$, $\phi_1=\alpha_1\sigma$, $\phi_2=\alpha_2\sigma$ reduces the dynamics to ordinary differential equations; an invariant plane of solutions is found, and linearising fluctuations in $\rho$, $\theta_1$, and $\theta_2$ produces the normal variational equations, second-order linear ODEs of Schrödinger form. Kovacic's algorithm then decides whether those ODEs admit Liouvillian solutions by inspecting the pole structure of the corresponding potential. For the sinusoidal choice, the warp factor $f_1$ in front of $\mathrm{AdS}_5$ becomes constant, which is the geometric reason the associated normal variational equations become constant-coefficient oscillators; this is the mechanism that singles out $\alpha(z)=A\sin(\omega z)$.

What would settle it

Check whether $\alpha(z)=A\sin(\omega z)$ satisfies the massive type IIA BPS equations, Bianchi identities, and Page-charge quantisation for a smeared D8-brane source; if no smearing function can be found, the special geometry lies outside the theory and the central claim collapses. On the positive side, constructing an explicit Lax connection for this background would convert the suggestive evidence into a proof, while a failure to find one would leave the claim at the level established here.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper studies the massive type IIA solutions of [22], whose metric and fluxes are all determined by a single function $\alpha(z)$, with $\alpha'''\propto F_0$ tying its third derivative to the Romans mass. Consistency with localised D8-branes and Page-charge quantisation forces $\alpha(z)$ to be piecewise cubic on the interval, and those are the linear quivers. For any such choice, the normal variational equations obtained from a wrapped string soliton fail the necessary conditions for Liouvillian solutions under Kovacic's algorithm, and the numerical diagnostics confirm chaos. The exception is the sinusoidal choice $\alpha(z)=A\sin(\omega z)$, for which the warp factor in front of $\mathrm{AdS}_5$ becomes constant, so the geometry is effectively a direct product of integrable submanifolds up to the non-trivial $S^2\times H^2$ fibration; the $\rho$ and $\theta_1$ normal variational equations become harmonic oscillators with constant coefficients, and all numerical probes show regular dynamics. The paper's stated conclusion is that the dual field theory is classically integrable only for the choice $\alpha(z) = A\sin(\omega z)$, while all linear quivers are chaotic and hence not Liouville integrable.

Load-bearing premise

The fragile premise is that $\alpha(z)=A\sin(\omega z)$ with continuously smeared D8-branes is a genuine solution of massive type IIA supergravity; the paper assumes this by analogy with the mother $\mathrm{AdS}_7$ solution of [15] rather than verifying the BPS equations, Bianchi identities, and Page-charge quantisation for this background.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the evidence holds, the sinusoidal quiver is the unique classically integrable member of this family, and every linear quiver is non-integrable.
  • The special choice should be understood as having D8-branes smeared continuously along the $z$-direction, in the same sense as the integrable mother $\mathrm{AdS}_7$ solution, rather than localised at discrete points.
  • Adding a small $\epsilon z$ deformation to the sinusoidal profile produces chaotic Poincaré sections, indicating that the integrable point is isolated within the parameter space.
  • For the sinusoidal background, the $\theta_2$ normal variational equation remains analytically intractable, but its numerical regularity is consistent with integrability in that sector as well.
  • The non-integrability of the linear quivers is established as a definitive analytic statement, while integrability of the special quiver, pending a Lax connection, is a strong suggestion rather than a proof.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a direct check of the BPS equations and Bianchi identities validates $\alpha(z)=A\sin(\omega z)$, the pattern suggests a search heuristic for holographic integrability: look for members of warped families where the warp factor in front of the $\mathrm{AdS}$ factor can be tuned to a constant.
  • The extreme sensitivity to an $\epsilon z$ deformation hints at a possible no-go statement that non-trivial warping of the $\mathrm{AdS}$ factor generically destroys classical string integrability; the paper itself leaves this as an open question.
  • The same combination of Kovacic checks and chaos diagnostics could be applied to the $T^2$ and $S^2$ twisted compactifications of the same parent theory, once the pathologies noted in the construction are resolved, to see whether integrability again selects a sinusoidal profile.
  • Finding an explicit Lax connection for the sinusoidal background would promote the paper's suggestive evidence to a proof and would most likely expose a hidden symmetry structure compatible with the $S^2\times H^2$ fibration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a recently constructed one-parameter family of massive type IIA supergravity backgrounds with a warped AdS5 factor, dual to four-dimensional N=1 quivers. The authors analyze classical string integrability by deriving Normal Variational Equations (NVEs) for a wrapped string soliton and applying Kovacic's algorithm, supplemented by numerical diagnostics (power spectra, Lyapunov exponents, Poincaré sections). They claim that all linear quiver choices are chaotic and non-integrable, while the special choice α(z) = A sin(ωz) is the unique candidate for an integrable dual field theory, with evidence coming from constant warp factors and Liouvillian solutions of the ρ and θ1 NVEs.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper identifies a new candidate integrable four-dimensional N=1 SCFT with a holographic massive type IIA dual, which would be a significant addition to the short list of such examples. The analytic methodology is standard and clearly presented, and the numerical work is extensive and well-motivated. The paper is also commendably explicit about what the method can and cannot prove, and it includes a self-contained appendix on Kovacic's algorithm. However, the significance is conditional on the sinusoidal background being a bona fide massive IIA solution and on the completeness of the integrability evidence, both of which are not fully settled in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 2.1, 4.1, 4.3, 6] The sinusoidal choice α(z)=A sin(ωz) lies outside the family of backgrounds that were validated as supergravity solutions. Section 2.1 states that consistency with the BPS equations and Bianchi identities requires α''' to be piecewise constant, and Section 4.1 recalls that the verified family in [22] consists of cubic functions with α^(4)=0 and α(0)=α(P)=0. For the sine, α'''=-Aω^3 cos(ωz) is nowhere piecewise constant and α^(4) is nonzero. The paper's support for the sine is an analogy with the mother AdS7 solution (Section 4.3), while Section 6 lists 'the precise smearing form of this solution' as an open problem. Because the concluding uniqueness claim concerns this specific background, its admissibility is load-bearing. The authors should either verify the BPS/Bianchi/Page-charge system for the smeared-D8 interpretation or explicitly soften the claim to a family that is not yet known to be realized in massive IIA.
  2. [Section 4.3, NVE for θ2] The analytic case for integrability of the sine quiver is incomplete. After deriving the θ2 NVE in Section 3, the paper states 'we will omit any further discussion here' and appeals by analogy to the AdS7 analysis of [15]. The ρ and θ1 NVEs are solved in closed form, but the θ2 direction is only addressed numerically. Since non-integrability of any one direction would destroy integrability, the statement in Section 6 that the sine is the unique choice that 'can pass all the conditions' is not supported by the analytic analysis. A Kovacic treatment of the θ2 NVE, or a clear statement that the integrability evidence for this direction is numerical only, is needed.
  3. [Sections 4.2 and 6] The claim that 'all linear quivers are chaotic and hence not Liouville integrable' overreaches the presented evidence. For the cubic ansatz, the ρ NVE is classified with Kovacic's algorithm, but the θ1 potential in Eq. (4.5) and the θ2 potential are not rational functions, so Kovacic's algorithm cannot be applied to them. The numerical analysis covers a handful of explicit examples (Eqs. (4.2), (4.3), (5.1)) plus an unspecified set of 'many more examples'. This supports a statement about all tested linear quivers, but not a proof for the entire infinite family. The authors should either extend the analytic argument or rephrase the conclusion accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.2)] The sign convention in the reduction to Schrödinger form is inconsistent with Eq. (3.14): Appendix A writes f = e^{(1/2)∫A1} z and obtains V = A2 - (1/2)A1' - (1/4)A1^2, whereas Section 3 gives V = (1/4)(2A1' + A1^2 - 4A2), which has the opposite sign for the A1' and A1^2 terms. Please unify the convention.
  2. [Figures 2, 5, 6] Several figure captions are inconsistent or contain typos: Figures 5 and 6 both repeat the '(ρ(t), any coordinate)-plane' caption though they appear to illustrate θ1 and θ2, and 'fronzen' is a typo. Please correct the captions.
  3. [Eq. (5.1) and Fig. 10] The notation '−81π25' in Eq. (5.1) and in the caption of Fig. 10(b) is ambiguous; it should presumably be a fraction or an explicit power of π. The caption in Fig. 10(b) also has the duplicated expression 'α(z) = α(z) = ...'.
  4. [Throughout] There are numerous small typos and grammatical slips (e.g., 'It is measures', 'intepretation', 'striclty', 'coodinate', 'tecnhiques', 'fronzen'). A careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  5. [Section 5.3, Eq. (5.18)] The deformed examples α(z)=sin(π z/10)+ε z do not satisfy the boundary conditions α(0)=α(P)=0 of the physical quiver family; the text notes that they have no particular physical meaning, which is fine, but it would help to state explicitly that they are purely mathematical perturbations used to probe integrability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NVE-based integrability evidence is derived from the background geometry rather than fitted into the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The NVEs (Eqs. 3.15-3.23) are obtained by linearizing the string equations of motion (3.5) around the invariant plane (3.9) and the solution z_sol (3.12); they depend only on the background functions f_i evaluated on a chosen alpha(z). For alpha(z) = A sin(omega z), the reduction of the rho and theta_1 NVEs to constant-coefficient oscillators (Eqs. 4.8, 4.10) follows by direct substitution, and the linear-quiver non-integrability discussion uses the same NVEs with cubic alpha. No parameter is fitted to a target integrability conclusion, and no prediction is defined in terms of the quantity it claims to predict. The special sinusoidal choice is selected by analogy with the known integrable AdS7 solution of [15] and by the heuristic of an unwarped AdS factor (Secs. 1.5, 4.3), but the subsequent analytic and numerical evidence is computed independently for that choice. Self-citations such as [32, 38, 42] are methodological and are not load-bearing for the central claim. The paper explicitly flags its main gaps: the smeared-D8 interpretation of the sine background is suggested rather than verified (Sec. 4.3 bullets) and the precise smearing form is left as an open problem in Section 6; the theta_2 NVE for the sine case is not solved analytically and is supported only by analogy with [15] and by numerics (Sec. 4.3). These are correctness and completeness concerns, not circularity: the NVE results for the sine case are obtained by calculation rather than assumed from the input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four background assumptions: the validity of the AdS5 family from [22], the ad hoc extension to the smeared sinusoidal solution, the sufficiency of a single string embedding to probe integrability, and the interpretation of absence of chaos as evidence for integrability. No new entities are invented and no data are fitted.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The AdS5 family of [22] with polynomial α(z) are valid solutions of massive type IIA supergravity.
    The paper relies on the background construction of [22] (Section 2.1) without re-deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper The sinusoidal choice α(z)=A sin(ωz) corresponds to a valid supergravity solution with smeared D8-branes.
    Section 4.3 asserts this by analogy with [15] and does not check BPS equations, Bianchi identities, or Page charges for this case; the paper lists finding the precise smearing form as open work.
  • domain assumption A single string embedding (3.3) and its NVEs are sufficient to detect non-integrability of the whole background.
    Standard analytic non-integrability logic (Section 1.2): one counterexample among string configurations rules out universal integrability; the converse is used to build evidence.
  • domain assumption Absence of chaotic signatures in the numerical probes (power spectra, Lyapunov exponents, Poincaré sections) constitutes evidence for integrability.
    Chaos implies non-integrability, so its absence is consistent with integrability but not sufficient; the authors explicitly acknowledge this in Section 1.3.
  • domain assumption Classical string integrability in the gravity background reflects the integrability of the dual 4d N=1 SCFT.
    AdS/CFT dictionary assumption used throughout; the authors note the string soliton corresponds to long unprotected operators (Section 1.4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence for a $4$-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ integrable quiver in massive type IIA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DFPRYGFP

@misc{pith2026241212257,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence for a $4$-dimensional $\mathcalN=1$ integrable quiver in massive type IIA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DFPRYGFP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12257}
}
abstract

We are examining a newly discovered parametric family of backgrounds in massive type IIA supergravity that contains a warped $\text{AdS}_5$ factor. This family is the dual gravity description of $4$-dimensional quivers with $\mathcal{N}=1$ supersymmetry. We are interested in the status of classical integrability in these theories and we show that there exists a single choice of solutions that is special, while all other choices lead to non-integrable quivers and chaotic string motion. By focusing on this special choice we provide strong suggestive evidence for the integrability of the dual field theory based on analytic studies and extensive numerical analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12257 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The quiver field theory. The Φi adjoint fields obtain a mass. We have used a double arrow and Q,Q˜ for the bi-fundamentals fields, while for the fundamentals are denoted by q, q˜. The vector multiplets are represented by the circles. We have used a 4-dimensional, N = 1 language. In this diagram, the . . . . . . . . . should be understood as continuing the quiver in the same pattern; e.g bi-fundamentals connect N2 to… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The dynamical evolution of the various string coordinates in time. The parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The various frozen trajectories in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The various frozen trajectories in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The various fronzen trajectories in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The various frozen trajectories in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The power spectra for the (z(t), ρ(t), θ1(t), θ1(t)) trajectories. The parameters chosen are: α1 = α2 = 1, m = 1, and Ψ0 = 0. frequency, we observe that all the higher harmonics are lost and what is happening is that there is a broad band of noise that is overtaking th…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The power spectra for the (z(t), ρ(t), θ1(t), θ1(t)) trajectories. The parameters chosen are: α1 = α2 = 1, m = 1, and Ψ0 = 0. have checked that even if we energetically excite the string and repeat the same analysis, we can reach the same qualitative output. This is an…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Power spectra for the two quivers discussed in equations ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Lyapunov for the integrable and non-integrable quivers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Some indicative Poincar´e sections Figure 11a: Poincar´e sections for the quiver with defining function α(z) = sin π 10 z  on top and for α(z) = sin π 10 z  + 0.00071z on the bottom. The value of the parameter m is m = 2 3 . These plots strongly suggest that the cla…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Poincar´e sections Figure 12a: Some indicative Poincar´e sections for the quiver with defining function α(z) = sin π 10 z  on top and for α(z) = sin π 10 z  + 0.0953z on the bottom. The value of the parameter m is m = 1. These plots strongly suggest that the classic…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparative study of the butterfly velocity in holographic QCD models at finite temperature and chemical potential

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using three independent holographic methods, the authors obtain matching butterfly velocities for four QCD-like models and find a universal increase with temperature and decrease with chemical potential.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [22]

    Compactification of 6d N=(1,0) quivers, 4d SCFTs and their holographic dual Massive IIA backgrounds,

    P. Merrikin, C. Nunez, and R. Stuardo, “Compactification of 6d N=(1,0) quivers, 4d SCFTs and their holographic dual Massive IIA backgrounds,” Nucl. Phys. B 996 (2023) 116356, 2210.02458

    arXiv 2023

  2. [15]

    Integrability and holographic aspects of six-dimensional N = (1, 0) superconformal field theories,

    K. Filippas, C. N´ u˜ nez, and J. Van Gorsel, “Integrability and holographic aspects of six-dimensional N = (1, 0) superconformal field theories,” JHEP 06 (2019) 069, 1901.08598

    arXiv 2019

  3. [1]

    Lectures on Integrable Systems,

    G. Arutyunov, “Lectures on Integrable Systems,” PoS Regio2020 (2021) 001

    work page 2021

  4. [2]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, hep-th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

  5. [3]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,

    N. Beisert et. al., “Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,” Lett. Math. Phys. 99 (2012) 3–32, 1012.3982

    arXiv 2012

  6. [4]

    Lectures on Classical Integrability,

    A. Torrielli, “Lectures on Classical Integrability,” J. Phys. A 49 (2016), no. 32 323001, 1606.02946

    arXiv 2016

  7. [5]

    Integrability in Sigma-Models,

    K. Zarembo, “Integrability in Sigma-Models,” 1712.07725

    arXiv

  8. [6]

    Hidden symmetries of the AdS(5) x S**5 superstring,

    I. Bena, J. Polchinski, and R. Roiban, “Hidden symmetries of the AdS(5) x S**5 superstring,” Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 046002, hep-th/0305116

    arXiv 2004

Show all 73 references
  1. [7]

    Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals,

    K. Sfetsos, “Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals,” Nucl. Phys. B 880 (2014) 225–246, 1312.4560

    2014 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Integrable Deformations of T -Dual σ Models,

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff, “Integrable Deformations of T -Dual σ Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 25 251602, 1609.09834

    2016 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Derivation of the action and symmetries of the q-deformed AdS5 × S5 superstring,

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, “Derivation of the action and symmetries of the q-deformed AdS5 × S5 superstring,” JHEP 10 (2014) 132, 1406.6286

    2014 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Integrability and the AdS(3)/CFT(2) correspondence,

    A. Babichenko, B. Stefanski, Jr., and K. Zarembo, “Integrability and the AdS(3)/CFT(2) correspondence,” JHEP 03 (2010) 058, 0912.1723

    2010 arXiv

  5. [11]

    The Gravity duals of N=2 superconformal field theories,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Maldacena, “The Gravity duals of N=2 superconformal field theories,” JHEP 10 (2012) 189, 0904.4466

    2012 arXiv

  6. [12]

    On non-abelian T-dual geometries with Ramond fluxes,

    K. Sfetsos and D. C. Thompson, “On non-abelian T-dual geometries with Ramond fluxes,” Nucl. Phys. B 846 (2011) 21–42, 1012.1320

    2011 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Field theory aspects of non-Abelian T-duality andN = 2 linear quivers,

    Y. Lozano and C. N´ u˜ nez, “Field theory aspects of non-Abelian T-duality andN = 2 linear quivers,” JHEP 05 (2016) 107, 1603.04440

    2016 arXiv

  8. [14]

    On non-abelian T-duality and deformations of supercoset string sigma-models,

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff, “On non-abelian T-duality and deformations of supercoset string sigma-models,” JHEP 10 (2017) 024, 1706.10169. 52

    2017 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals,

    O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena, “Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals,” JHEP 05 (2005) 033, hep-th/0502086

    2005 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background,

    S. Frolov, “Lax pair for strings in Lunin-Maldacena background,” JHEP 05 (2005) 069, hep-th/0503201

    2005 arXiv

  11. [18]

    On spin chains and field theories,

    R. Roiban, “On spin chains and field theories,” JHEP 09 (2004) 023, hep-th/0312218

    2004 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Gauge-string duality for superconformal deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,

    S. A. Frolov, R. Roiban, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Gauge-string duality for superconformal deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP 07 (2005) 045, hep-th/0503192

    2005 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Deformations of N=4 SYM and integrable spin chain models,

    D. Berenstein and S. A. Cherkis, “Deformations of N=4 SYM and integrable spin chain models,” Nucl. Phys. B 702 (2004) 49–85, hep-th/0405215

    2004 arXiv

  14. [21]

    On Marginal Deformations and Non-Integrability,

    D. Giataganas, L. A. Pando Zayas, and K. Zoubos, “On Marginal Deformations and Non-Integrability,” JHEP 01 (2014) 129, 1311.3241

    2014 arXiv

  15. [23]

    AdS 6 solutions of type II supergravity,

    F. Apruzzi, M. Fazzi, A. Passias, D. Rosa, and A. Tomasiello, “AdS 6 solutions of type II supergravity,” JHEP 11 (2014) 099, 1406.0852. [Erratum: JHEP 05, 012 (2015)]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Six-Dimensional Superconformal Theories and their Compactifications from Type IIA Supergravity,

    F. Apruzzi, M. Fazzi, A. Passias, A. Rota, and A. Tomasiello, “Six-Dimensional Superconformal Theories and their Compactifications from Type IIA Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), no. 6 061601, 1502.06616

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Universal consistent truncation for 6d/7d gauge/gravity duals,

    A. Passias, A. Rota, and A. Tomasiello, “Universal consistent truncation for 6d/7d gauge/gravity duals,” JHEP 10 (2015) 187, 1506.05462

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    AdS 7/CFT6 with orientifolds,

    F. Apruzzi and M. Fazzi, “AdS 7/CFT6 with orientifolds,” JHEP 01 (2018) 124, 1712.03235

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Minimal flux Minkowski classification,

    N. T. Macpherson and A. Tomasiello, “Minimal flux Minkowski classification,” JHEP 09 (2017) 126, 1612.06885. 53

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Holography, Brane Intersections and Six-dimensional SCFTs,

    N. Bobev, G. Dibitetto, F. F. Gautason, and B. Truijen, “Holography, Brane Intersections and Six-dimensional SCFTs,” JHEP 02 (2017) 116, 1612.06324

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    6d holographic anomaly match as a continuum limit,

    S. Cremonesi and A. Tomasiello, “6d holographic anomaly match as a continuum limit,” JHEP 05 (2016) 031, 1512.02225

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    An algorithm for solving second order linear homogeneous differential equations,

    J. J. Kovacic, “An algorithm for solving second order linear homogeneous differential equations,” Journal of Symbolic Computation 2 (1986), no. 1 3 – 43

    1986

  23. [31]

    Chaos rules out integrability of strings on AdS5 × T 1,1,

    P. Basu and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Chaos rules out integrability of strings on AdS5 × T 1,1,” Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 243–248, 1103.4107

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nonintegrability of La,b,c quiver gauge theories,

    K. S. Rigatos, “Nonintegrability of La,b,c quiver gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 10 106022, 2009.11878

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Constraining integrable AdS/CFT with factorized scattering,

    L. Wulff, “Constraining integrable AdS/CFT with factorized scattering,” JHEP 04 (2019) 133, 1903.08660

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Condition on Ramond-Ramond fluxes for factorization of worldsheet scattering in anti–de Sitter space,

    L. Wulff, “Condition on Ramond-Ramond fluxes for factorization of worldsheet scattering in anti–de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 10 101901, 1708.09673

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Classifying integrable symmetric space strings via factorized scattering,

    L. Wulff, “Classifying integrable symmetric space strings via factorized scattering,” JHEP 02 (2018) 106, 1711.00296

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Integrability of the superstring in AdS 3× S2× S2× T3,

    L. Wulff, “Integrability of the superstring in AdS 3× S2× S2× T3,” J. Phys. A 50 (2017), no. 23 23LT01, 1702.08788

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Analytic nonintegrability and S-matrix factorization,

    D. Giataganas, “Analytic nonintegrability and S-matrix factorization,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 6 066017, 1909.02577

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    The non-Integrability of Strings in Massive Type IIA and their Holographic duals,

    C. N´ u˜ nez, J. M. Pen ´ ın, D. Roychowdhury, and J. Van Gorsel, “The non-Integrability of Strings in Massive Type IIA and their Holographic duals,” JHEP 06 (2018) 078, 1802.04269

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Chaos in the Gauge / Gravity Correspondence,

    L. A. Pando Zayas and C. A. Terrero-Escalante, “Chaos in the Gauge / Gravity Correspondence,” JHEP 09 (2010) 094, 1007.0277

    2010 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Analytic Non-integrability in String Theory,

    P. Basu and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Analytic Non-integrability in String Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 046006, 1105.2540. 54

    2011 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Integrability and non-integrability in N = 2 SCFTs and their holographic backgrounds,

    C. Nunez, D. Roychowdhury, and D. C. Thompson, “Integrability and non-integrability in N = 2 SCFTs and their holographic backgrounds,” JHEP 07 (2018) 044, 1804.08621

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Non-integrability in AdS 3 vacua,

    K. S. Rigatos, “Non-integrability in AdS 3 vacua,” JHEP 02 (2021) 032, 2011.08224

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Non-integrability on AdS 3 supergravity backgrounds,

    K. Filippas, “Non-integrability on AdS 3 supergravity backgrounds,” JHEP 02 (2020) 027, 1910.12981

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Nonintegrability of the Ω deformation,

    K. Filippas, “Nonintegrability of the Ω deformation,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 4 046025, 1912.03791

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    On (non)integrability of classical strings in p-brane backgrounds,

    A. Stepanchuk and A. A. Tseytlin, “On (non)integrability of classical strings in p-brane backgrounds,” J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 125401, 1211.3727

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    (Non)-Integrability of Geodesics in D-brane Backgrounds,

    Y. Chervonyi and O. Lunin, “(Non)-Integrability of Geodesics in D-brane Backgrounds,” JHEP 02 (2014) 061, 1311.1521

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Chaotic string dynamics in deformed T 1,1,

    T. Ishii, S. Kushiro, and K. Yoshida, “Chaotic string dynamics in deformed T 1,1,” JHEP 05 (2021) 158, 2103.12416

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Analytic (non)integrability of Arutyunov-Bassi-Lacroix model,

    J. Pal, A. Mukherjee, A. Lala, and D. Roychowdhury, “Analytic (non)integrability of Arutyunov-Bassi-Lacroix model,” Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136496, 2106.01237

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Non-integrability for N = 1 SCFTs in 5 d,

    D. Roychowdhury, “Non-integrability for N = 1 SCFTs in 5 d,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 8 086010, 2106.10646

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Non-integrability of strings in AdS6 × S2 × Σ background and its 5D holographic duals,

    G. Alencar and M. O. Tahim, “Non-integrability of strings in AdS6 × S2 × Σ background and its 5D holographic duals,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 3 189, 2106.11288

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Chaotic dynamics of strings around the Bardeen-AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence dark energy,

    J. Xie, Y. Wang, and B. Tang, “Chaotic dynamics of strings around the Bardeen-AdS black hole surrounded by quintessence dark energy,” Phys. Dark Univ. 40 (2023) 101184, 2210.08641

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Anisotropic and frame dependent chaos of suspended strings from a dynamical holographic QCD model with magnetic field,

    B. Shukla, D. Dudal, and S. Mahapatra, “Anisotropic and frame dependent chaos of suspended strings from a dynamical holographic QCD model with magnetic field,” JHEP 06 (2023) 178, 2303.15716. 55

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Nambu-Goto strings with a null symmetry and contact structure,

    H. Kozaki, T. Koike, Y. Morisawa, and H. Ishihara, “Nambu-Goto strings with a null symmetry and contact structure,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 8 084069, 2303.17969

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Circular motion and chaos bound of a charged particle near charged 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet-AdS black holes,

    J. Xie, J. Wang, and B. Tang, “Circular motion and chaos bound of a charged particle near charged 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet-AdS black holes,” Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 101271, 2304.10422

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Chaotic string dynamics in bosonic η-deformed AdS5×T1,1 background,

    J. Pal, “Chaotic string dynamics in bosonic η-deformed AdS5×T1,1 background,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38 (2023), no. 30n31 2350142, 2304.10474

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    A Note on Integrability Loss in Fuzzball Geometries,

    M. Emelin and S. Massai, “A Note on Integrability Loss in Fuzzball Geometries,” Fortsch. Phys. 71 (2023), no. 8-9 2300120, 2305.11793

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Integrability and non-integrability for marginal deformations of 4d N = 2 SCFTs,

    J. Pal, S. Roychowdhury, A. Lala, and D. Roychowdhury, “Integrability and non-integrability for marginal deformations of 4d N = 2 SCFTs,” JHEP 10 (2023) 173, 2307.12079

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Circular string in a black p-brane leading to chaos,

    P. Dutta, K. L. Panigrahi, and B. Singh, “Circular string in a black p-brane leading to chaos,” JHEP 10 (2023) 189, 2307.12350

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Integrability and non-integrability for holographic dual of Matrix model and non-Abelian T-dual of AdS 5×S5,

    J. Pal and S. Roychowdhury, “Integrability and non-integrability for holographic dual of Matrix model and non-Abelian T-dual of AdS 5×S5,” 2310.11744

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Chaotic spin chains in AdS/CFT,

    T. McLoughlin and A. Spiering, “Chaotic spin chains in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 09 (2022) 240, 2202.12075

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems

    E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems . Cambridge University Press, 2002

    2002

  54. [62]

    Numerical calculation of Lyapunov exponents,

    M. Sandri, “Numerical calculation of Lyapunov exponents,” Math. J. 6 (01, 1996)

    1996

  55. [63]

    A multiplicative ergodic theorem.Liapunov characteristic number for dynamical systems,

    O. V. I., “A multiplicative ergodic theorem.Liapunov characteristic number for dynamical systems,” Trans.Moscow Math.Soc. 19 (1968) 197–231

    1968

  56. [64]

    Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for Hamiltonian systems; A method for computing all of them. Part 2: Numerical application,

    G. Benettin, L. Galgani, A. Giorgilli, and M. Strelcyn, “Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for Hamiltonian systems; A method for computing all of them. Part 2: Numerical application,” Meccanica15 (03, 1980) 21–30

    1980

  57. [65]

    Unquenched Flavor in the Gauge/Gravity Correspondence,

    C. Nunez, A. Paredes, and A. V. Ramallo, “Unquenched Flavor in the Gauge/Gravity Correspondence,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2010 (2010) 196714, 1002.1088. 56

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,

    E. Witten, “Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP 07 (1998) 006, hep-th/9805112

    1998 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Janus Configurations, Chern-Simons Couplings, And The theta-Angle in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “Janus Configurations, Chern-Simons Couplings, And The theta-Angle in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,” JHEP 06 (2010) 097, 0804.2907

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009), no. 3 721–896, 0807.3720

    2009 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Spin-2 spectrum of defect theories,

    C. Bachas and J. Estes, “Spin-2 spectrum of defect theories,” JHEP 06 (2011) 005, 1103.2800

    2011 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,

    D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena, and H. S. Nastase, “Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,” JHEP 04 (2002) 013, hep-th/0202021

    2002 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, hep-th/0603001

    2006 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Confinement, Phase Transitions and non-Locality in the Entanglement Entropy,

    U. Kol, C. Nunez, D. Schofield, J. Sonnenschein, and M. Warschawski, “Confinement, Phase Transitions and non-Locality in the Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 06 (2014) 005, 1403.2721

    2014 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Type IIB supergravity solutions with AdS 5 from Abelian and non-Abelian T dualities,

    N. T. Macpherson, C. N´ u˜ nez, L. A. Pando Zayas, V. G. J. Rodgers, and C. A. Whiting, “Type IIB supergravity solutions with AdS 5 from Abelian and non-Abelian T dualities,” JHEP 02 (2015) 040, 1410.2650. 57

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.