Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 133 references

Lindblad dynamics of open multi-mode bosonic systems: Algebra of bilinear superoperators, exceptional points and speed of evolution

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that for a multimode bosonic system in a thermal bath, the diagonalized Liouvillian is completely determined by the temperature-independent effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian $\hat H_{\rm eff}=J_H$ with…

desk verdict A solid, self-contained algebraic treatment of multimode bosonic Lindbladians whose central spectral reduction is mostly known but re-derived cleanly, with fixable presentation issues in the applications. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13890 v2 pith:IYYPIQIF submitted 2024-12-18 quant-ph

Andrei Gaidash , Alexei D. Kiselev , Anton Kozubov , George Miroshnichenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81S2281Q1215A24
keywords Lindbladequationmulti-modebosonicsystemssuperoperatoralgebraLiouvillianexceptionalpointseffectivenon-HermitianHamiltonianquantumspeedlimitpolarizationqubitmatrixRiccati
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the Lindblad dynamics of many coupled bosonic modes has a single hidden master object: a temperature-independent non-Hermitian matrix $H=\Omega-i\Gamma$ built from the coherent coupling matrix $\Omega$ and the relaxation matrix $\Gamma$. If this is right, the full spectrum of the Liouvillian, every decay rate and oscillation frequency, and the evolution of any initial state can be read off from the eigenvalues and matrix exponential of this one matrix. The route is a Lie-algebraic elimination of the quantum-jump terms that recasts the Liouvillian in a diagonalized form governed solely by the effective Hamiltonian. The authors then use the reduction to map the exceptional-point geometry of a two-mode polarization system and to compute the speed of evolution of a polarization qubit as a function of coupling angles and temperature.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Lie algebra generated by quadratic combinations of left and right superoperators, $\hat K^{(+)}_{nm} = \overleftarrow{a}_n^\dagger \overrightarrow{a}_m$, $\hat K^{(-)}_{nm} = \overleftarrow{a}_m \overrightarrow{a}_n^\dagger$, $\hat K^{(0)}_{nm}$, and $\hat N^{(-)}_{nm}$, organized as superoperators associated with matrices so that commutators become matrix (anti)commutators. The key identities are the adjoint-action formulas (23), which show that exponentials of $\hat K^{(\pm)}_B$ shift the matrices $\Omega$, $\Gamma_0$, $\Gamma_\pm$; choosing $B$ to make the jump coefficients vanish yields a diagonalized Liouvillian. For thermal baths the required solutions are the trivial Riccati roots $A_\nu = -\nu I$, so the jump-eliminating transformations reduce to $T_{+-}=e^{\alpha_+ \hat K^{(+)}_I} e^{\alpha_- \hat K^{(-)}_I}$ with $\alpha_+ = -n_T$, $\alpha_- = 1$. The resulting diagonalized Liouvillian is built entirely from the effective Hamiltonian $\hat H_{\rm eff} = J_H$, $H=\Omega-i\Gamma$, whose matrix exponential $P(t)=e^{Lt}$, $L=-i\Omega-\Gamma$, supplies the superpropagator even when $H$ is non-diagonalizable.

What would settle it

Truncate the multimode Hilbert space to a finite Fock basis (say up to two photons per mode), assemble the Liouvillian matrix from Eq. (18) with thermal $\Gamma_\pm=\gamma_\pm\Gamma$, and diagonalize it numerically; then compare every eigenvalue with $\mu+\nu^*$ where $\mu,\nu$ run over the eigenvalues of $L=-i\Omega-\Gamma$. Any mismatch would falsify the claim that the diagonalized Liouvillian is completely determined by the effective Hamiltonian. A more targeted test is to pick non-thermal $\Gamma_\pm$ and check numerically whether a stabilizing solution of the Riccati equation (A1) with $P(\infty)=0$ exists; if not, the claimed generality beyond thermal baths fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a structural reduction: for a multimode bosonic system coupled to a thermal bath, the Liouvillian superoperator can be brought, by a similarity transformation that eliminates the quantum-jump (recycling) terms, to the diagonalized form $\hat L_d = \overleftarrow{\hat L}_{\rm eff} + \overrightarrow{\hat L}_{\rm eff}^\dagger$ with $\hat L_{\rm eff} = -i\hat H_{\rm eff}$ and $\hat H_{\rm eff} = J_H$, $H = \Omega - i\Gamma$. This effective Hamiltonian is temperature independent, unlike the semiclassical Hamiltonian that appears when jumps are simply neglected. Consequently the entire spectral problem for the Liouvillian, eigenvalues, eigenoperators, and the superpropagator, is governed by the spectrum and matrix exponential of the single non-Hermitian matrix $H$, and Liouvillian exceptional points are exactly the parameter values at which $H$ is non-diagonalizable. The paper demonstrates the machinery on a two-mode photonic-polarization model, deriving the exceptional-point geometry ($\gamma \perp \omega$, $|\gamma| = |\omega|$) and an approximate low-temperature evolution speed for a polarization-qubit initial state.

Load-bearing premise

The reduction assumes the jump-eliminating similarity transformation exists globally and yields a bounded diagonalized Liouvillian; for thermal baths this is guaranteed by the explicit Riccati solution $A_\nu=-\nu I$, but for the general relaxation matrices named in the conclusions the required stabilizing solution is not proven to exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full spectrum and eigenmode expansion of the thermal-bath multimode Liouvillian follow from the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the single matrix $L=-i\Omega-\Gamma$, so spectral analysis of the open system reduces to diagonalizing one non-Hermitian matrix.
  • Liouvillian exceptional points occur precisely where the effective Hamiltonian matrix $H=\Omega-i\Gamma$ is non-diagonalizable, transferring the exceptional-point analysis from the superoperator level to a matrix degeneracy problem.
  • For the two-mode polarization model, exceptional points lie at $|\omega|=|\gamma|$ with $\omega\perp\gamma$, and the evolution speed exhibits a slowdown there, separating exponential ($\omega<\gamma$) and oscillatory ($\omega>\gamma$) regimes.
  • In the low-temperature regime the approximate superpropagator (93) keeps finite-Fock-support density matrices finite-dimensional, so evolution speeds for polarization qubits can be computed exactly within a truncated Fock space.
  • The jump-eliminating transformations tie the thermal-bath steady state to the bath temperature through $W_\pm=\gamma_\pm I$, making the steady-state covariance matrix a direct output of the algebraic construction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reduction extends to non-thermal relaxation matrices as the conclusions suggest, then every quadratic bosonic Lindblad equation whose Riccati equation admits a stabilizing solution would inherit the same spectral calculus, placing a much wider class of continuous-variable open systems under one roof.
  • A natural testable extension is to use the same superoperator algebra to compute multi-time correlation functions via the quantum regression theorem, which the paper mentions but does not develop.
  • The predicted exceptional-point condition in the polarization model could be probed experimentally by tuning birefringence and dichroism in an optical fiber so that $\omega\perp\gamma$ and $|\omega|=|\gamma|$, then looking for the predicted slowdown in time-resolved polarization measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an algebraic method for the Lindblad dynamics of multi-mode bosonic systems coupled to a thermal bath. The central technical objects are quadratic superoperators built from left and right actions of bosonic creation and annihilation operators; the commutation relations of these superoperators are used to construct similarity transformations that eliminate the quantum-jump (recycling) terms. The authors show that, after such a transformation, the Liouvillian reduces to the diagonalized form L_d = L_eff + L_eff^†, with L_eff = -i H_eff and H_eff = Ω - iΓ. This establishes that the spectrum and eigenoperators of the thermal-bath Liouvillian are governed by the temperature-independent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H_eff. Liouvillian exceptional points are then identified with parameter values at which the matrix H = Ω - iΓ is non-diagonalizable. The method is applied to the two-mode photonic polarization model: the paper derives the EP condition γ ⊥ ω and |γ| = |ω|, gives the explicit matrix exponential P(t), and studies the low-temperature speed of evolution for single-photon polarization qubit states.

Significance. The central algebraic claim is significant and, as far as I can check, correct: the jump-eliminating transformation T_+- with A_- = I eliminates K_- for arbitrary positive Γ_± with Γ = Γ_- - Γ_+ > 0, and the remaining equation for A_+ is a linear Lyapunov equation whose solution is given by the convergent integral (31). The paper therefore does not rely on the proportionality Γ_± ∝ Γ in the way one might initially fear; the thermal-bath structure is sufficient but not necessary for the main diagonalization. The explicit identification of Liouvillian exceptional points with nondiagonalizability of H is well supported by the Kronecker-sum structure and by the explicit 2x2 matrix exponential. The paper also derives closed formulas for the single-mode and multi-mode eigenoperator expansions and for the low-temperature superpropagator. These are useful analytical tools for continuous-variable open quantum systems, complementing third-quantization and numerical approaches, and the EP geometry for the polarization-mode model is a concrete, falsifiable prediction.

major comments (2)
  1. [§III A, Eq. (73); §IV A, Eq. (86)] Equation (73) states P(t) = e^{-(iΩ + Γ/2)t}, but Eq. (29) defines L = -iΩ - Γ and Eq. (86) gives P(t) = e^{-iHt} = e^{-(iω0+γ0)t}... with H = Ω - iΓ. These are mutually inconsistent unless Γ denotes two different matrices in the two places. If Γ is the matrix of Eq. (28), the correct formula is P(t) = e^{-(iΩ + Γ)t}. If instead the γ-vector parametrizes Γ/2, then Eq. (83) and Eq. (86) must be changed consistently. Since Eq. (73) feeds into the superpropagator formula (77) and into the definitions of R and Q used for the speed calculations, this factor-of-two inconsistency is a load-bearing notational error and must be fixed before publication.
  2. [§IV B, Eqs. (93)–(97), Figs. 1–3] The low-temperature approximation is first-order in n_T, but numerical results are presented up to n_T = 0.3. At this value the expansion parameter is not very small, and the paper provides no comparison with the exact evolution or with higher-order corrections. The qualitative features may well survive, but the quantitative claims about the temperature dependence of the initial speed and its decay rate are not yet supported as stated. I ask the authors to add a benchmark against either the exact solution (which their own formalism makes available through Eq. (77)) or a second-order calculation, or to restrict the displayed temperature range to values where the linear approximation is controlled.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§III B, Eq. (46)] In Eq. (46), the notation ν is introduced without defining the corresponding eigenstate of L_eff. Since L_eff is non-normal for general Ω and Γ, the reader should be told explicitly that |ν⟩ is a right eigenvector of L_eff with eigenvalue ν (so that the right multiplication by L_eff^† contributes ν*), or the formula should be rephrased using both right and left eigenvectors.
  2. [§IV A, after Eq. (89)] The phrase "EP induced slowdown" is used without a quantitative definition. The linear-in-time factor in Eq. (89) is evidence, but the paper should state which timescale (e.g., the late-time decay of the one-photon coherence) is compared and in what sense it is slower than at nearby parameter values.
  3. [Appendix A, line after Eq. (A25)] There is a typo: "Lindlandians" should be "Lindbladians", and "Ricatti" should be "Riccati" throughout.
  4. [References] A few reference-level typos should be corrected: Ref. [25] "crytography" → "cryptography", and Ref. [23] "University of Atwerp" → "University of Antwerp".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central spectral derivation is self-contained algebra; self-citations are contextual and the key results are rederived in the paper.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the thermal-bath multi-mode Liouvillian (18), after a jump-eliminating similarity transformation, becomes the diagonalized form (27) governed by the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with matrix H=Ω−iΓ. This is derived in the text and Appendix A, not assumed. The commutation relations (22) are established directly, the Riccati equations (A1) are solved explicitly for the thermal-bath case with Aν=−νI, and the remaining jump term is removed through the linear Lyapunov equation (30) whose solution is given by the convergent integral (31). The spectrum and eigenoperators then follow from the similarity relation (40) and the Kronecker-sum structure L_d ≅ L⊗I + I⊗conj(L), so the Liouvillian exceptional-point condition coincides with non-diagonalizability of H. No parameter is fitted to data and no prediction reduces to an input by construction. The self-citations (Refs. [32], [33], [44], [84], [109]) are contextual; the algebraic identities and steady-state relations they reference are either rederived in this paper or are standard Lyapunov-equation facts. The apparent Γ/2 in Eq. (73) is an internal typo, not a circular step. Therefore the derivation is self-contained and no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation has no fitted parameters or invented entities. It relies on the standard Lindblad thermal-bath model and standard algebraic identities. The main unproven assumption is the general existence of the jump-eliminating transformation beyond the thermal-bath case.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The dynamics is governed by the Lindblad master equation (3) with thermal bath relaxation matrices Γ± = γ± Γ, γ+ = n_T, γ- = n_T + 1.
    The entire analysis starts from this GKSL form; the method is specific to this class of open bosonic systems.
  • domain assumption The relaxation matrix Γ is positive definite, ensuring L = -iΩ - Γ has eigenvalues with negative real parts and P(∞)=0.
    Used to guarantee convergence of the integral (A14) defining Wν and the existence of the steady state; see Eq. (4) and Eq. (A18).
  • standard math The Jordan-Schwinger map properties (Eq. 11) for quadratic bosonic operators are valid.
    Standard textbook algebra; the paper extends this to superoperators.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lindblad dynamics of open multi-mode bosonic systems: Algebra of bilinear superoperators, exceptional points and speed of evolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IYYPIQIF

@misc{pith2026241213890,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lindblad dynamics of open multi-mode bosonic systems: Algebra of bilinear superoperators, exceptional points and speed of evolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IYYPIQIF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13890}
}
abstract

We develop the algebraic method based on the Lie algebra of quadratic combinations of left and right superoperators associated with matrices to study the Lindblad dynamics of multimode bosonic systems coupled a thermal bath and described by the Liouvillian superoperator that takes into account both dynamical (coherent) and environment mediated (incoherent) interactions between the modes. Our algebraic technique is applied to transform the Liouvillian into the diagonalized form by eliminating jump superoperators and solve the spectral problem. The temperature independent effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, $\hat{H}_{eff}$, is found to govern both the diagonalized Liouvillian and the spectral properties. It is shown that the Liouvillian exceptional points are represented by the points in the parameter space where the matrix, $H$, associated with $\hat{H}_{eff}$ is non-diagonalizable. We use our method to derive the low-temperature approximation for the superpropagator and to study the special case of a two mode system representing the photonic polarization modes. For this system, we describe the geometry of exceptional points in the space of frequency and relaxation vectors parameterizing the intermode couplings and, for a single-photon state, evaluate the time dependence of the speed of evolution as a function of the angles characterizing the couplings and the initial state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13890 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Speed of evolution computed from Eq. (97) for the initial state (99) with θ = π/4 and ϕ = 0 as a function of the dimensionless time parameter, γ0t, at the frequency and relaxation vectors: ω = 0.9γ0(0, 0, 1) and γ = 0.9γ0(sin θΓ, 0, cos θΓ). Three cases are shown: (a) θΓ = π/2, (b) θΓ = π/4 and (c) θΓ = 0. Solid, dashed and dotted-dashed lines are evaluated at nT = 0, nT = 0.1 and nT = 0.3, respectively. where the s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Speed of evolution in the γ0t–θ plane computed for the polarization qubit states (98) with ϕ = 0 at various values of nT and θΓ: (a) nT = 0 and θΓ = π/2; (b) nT = 0.3 and θΓ = π/2; (c) nT = 0 and θΓ = π/4; (d) nT = 0.3 and θΓ = π/4; (e) nT = 0 and θΓ = 0; (f) nT = 0.3 and θΓ = 0. The frequency and relaxation vectors are ω = 0.9γ0(0, 0, 1) and γ = 0.9γ0(sin θΓ, 0, cos θΓ), respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time dependence of evolution speed for the polarization qubit state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Single-mode spectral problem In order to illustrate the basic steps of our method, it is instructive to consider the simplest single-mode case with N = 1, where K(±) I ≡ K(±) and ˆLeff = −(iΩ + Γ)ˆa†ˆa. In this case, the solution of the spectral problem for the diagonalized Liouvillian reads λmn = −iΩ(m − n) − Γ(m + n), (52a) ˆρ(d) λ = ˆρ(d) mn = |m⟩ ⟨n| ...

  2. [2]

    Multi-mode spectral problem By contrast to the single-mode case, solving the spec- tral problem for the diagonalized multimode Liouvil- lian (27) requires additional considerations due to inter- mode interactions that complicate the effective Hamilto- nian(28)sothattheassociatedmatrix H isnon-diagonal. We shall apply the algebraic relations e ← −ˆV++ − →ˆ...

  3. [3]

    W. F. Stinespring, Positive functions on C∗-algebras, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society6, 211 (1955)

    1955

  4. [4]

    Choi, Completely positive linear maps on com- plex matrices, Linear Algebra and Its Applications10, 285 (1975)

    M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on com- plex matrices, Linear Algebra and Its Applications10, 285 (1975)

    1975

  5. [5]

    Kraus,States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol

    K. Kraus,States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 190 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983) p. 152

    1983

  6. [6]

    A. S. Holevo, On the mathematical theory of quantum communicationchannels,ProblemyPeredachiInformat- sii 8, 62 (1972)

    1972

  7. [7]

    Caruso, V

    F. Caruso, V. Giovannetti, C. Lupo, and S. Mancini, Quantum channels and memory effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1203 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    H. J. Carmichael,Statistical Methods in Quantum Op- tics 1. Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations, TextsandMonographsinPhysics(Springer,Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2002) p. 365

    2002

Show all 133 references
  1. [9]

    Omnès, General theory of the decoherence effect in quantum mechanics, Phys

    R. Omnès, General theory of the decoherence effect in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A56, 3383 (1997)

    1997

  2. [10]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford,

  3. [11]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012) p. 97

    2012

  4. [12]

    Rivas, S

    Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 094001 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Kossakowski, On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 3, 247 (1972)

    A. Kossakowski, On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 3, 247 (1972)

    1972

  7. [15]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  8. [16]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics 17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  9. [17]

    Pearle, Simple derivation of the Lindblad equation, European Journal of Physics33, 805 (2012)

    P. Pearle, Simple derivation of the Lindblad equation, European Journal of Physics33, 805 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    Albash, S

    T. Albash, S. Boixo, D. A. Lidar, and P. Zanardi, Quan- tum adiabatic Markovian master equations, New Jour- nal of Physics14, 123016 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    McCauley, B

    G. McCauley, B. Cruikshank, D. I. Bondar, and K. Jacobs, Accurate Lindblad-form master equation for weakly damped quantum systems across all regimes, npj Quantum Information6, 74 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Manzano, A short introduction to the Lindblad mas- ter equation, AIP Advances10, 025106 (2020)

    D. Manzano, A short introduction to the Lindblad mas- ter equation, AIP Advances10, 025106 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993) p

    H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993) p. 179

    1993

  14. [22]

    M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump ap- proach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 101 (1998)

    1998

  15. [23]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Advances in Physics63, 77 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Verstraelen and M

    W. Verstraelen and M. Wouters, Gaussian quan- tum trajectories for the variational simulation of open quantum-optical systems, Applied Sciences 8, 10.3390/app8091427 (2018)

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Verstraelen, Gaussian quantum trajectories for the variational simulation of open quantum systems, with photonic applications, Ph.D

    W. Verstraelen, Gaussian quantum trajectories for the variational simulation of open quantum systems, with photonic applications, Ph.D. thesis, University of Atwerp (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Verstraelen, D

    W. Verstraelen, D. Huybrechts, T. Roscilde, and M. Wouters, Quantum and classical correlations in open quantum spin lattices via truncated-cumulant trajecto- ries, PRX Quantum4, 030304 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    C. H. Bennett, Quantum crytography, inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, 1984(1984) pp. 175–179

    1984

  20. [28]

    Pirandola, U

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, et al., Advances in quantum cryptography, Advances in optics and photonics 12, 1012 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    S.Pirandola, J.Eisert, C.Weedbrook, A.Furusawa,and S. L. Braunstein, Advances in quantum teleportation, Nature photonics9, 641 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Pirandola, B

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weed- brook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nature Photonics12, 724 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Miroshnichenko, Decoherence of a one-photon packet in an imperfect optical fiber, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics82, 1550 (2018)

    G. Miroshnichenko, Decoherence of a one-photon packet in an imperfect optical fiber, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics82, 1550 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    A.Kozubov, A.Gaidash,andG.Miroshnichenko,Quan- tummodelofdecoherenceinthepolarizationdomainfor the fiber channel, Physical Review A99, 053842 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Gaidash, A

    A. Gaidash, A. Kozubov, and G. Miroshnichenko, Dissi- pative dynamics of quantum states in the fiber channel, Physical Review A102, 023711 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Gaidash, A

    A. Gaidash, A. Kozubov, G. Miroshnichenko, and A. D. Kiselev, Quantum dynamics of mixed polariza- tion states: Effects of environment-mediated intermode coupling, JOSA B38, 2603 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Hiroshima, Decoherence and entanglement in two- mode squeezed vacuum states, Phys

    T. Hiroshima, Decoherence and entanglement in two- mode squeezed vacuum states, Phys. Rev. A63, 022305 (2001)

    2001

  29. [37]

    Serafini, F

    A. Serafini, F. Illuminati, M. G. A. Paris, and S. De Siena, Entanglement and purity of two-mode Gaussian states in noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022318 (2004)

    2004

  30. [38]

    de Castro, R

    A. de Castro, R. Siqueira, and V. Dodonov, Effect of dissipation and reservoir temperature on squeezing ex- change and emergence of entanglement between two coupled bosonic modes, Physics Letters A 372, 367 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    C.-H. Chou, T. Yu, and B. L. Hu, Exact master equa- tion and quantum decoherence of two coupled harmonic oscillators in a general environment, Phys. Rev. E77, 011112 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    J. P. Paz and A. J. Roncaglia, Dynamics of the entangle- ment between two oscillators in the same environment, 19 Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 220401 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    J. P. Paz and A. J. Roncaglia, Dynamical phases for the evolution of the entanglement between two oscilla- tors coupled to the same environment, Phys. Rev. A79, 032102 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    F. A. S. Barbosa, A. J. de Faria, A. S. Coelho, K. N. Cassemiro, A. S. Villar, P. Nussenzveig, and M. Mar- tinelli, Disentanglement in bipartite continuous-variable systems, Phys. Rev. A84, 052330 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    Figueiredo, C

    E. Figueiredo, C. Linhares, A. Malbouisson, and J. Mal- bouisson, Time evolution of entanglement in a cavity at finitetemperature,PhysicaA:StatisticalMechanicsand its Applications462, 1261 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Linowski, C

    T. Linowski, C. Gneiting, and L. Rudnicki, Stabilizing entanglement in two-mode Gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A 102, 042405 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Vendromin and M

    C. Vendromin and M. M. Dignam, Continuous-variable entanglement in a two-mode lossy cavity: An analytic solution, Phys. Rev. A103, 022418 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    A. D. Kiselev, R. Ali, and A. V. Rybin, Lindblad dy- namics and disentanglement in multi-mode bosonic sys- tems, Entropy23, 1409 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    W. C. Wong, K. M. Lau, H. Liang, T. K. Yung, B. Zeng, and J. Li, Quantum optics of lossy metasurfaces: Prop- agating the photon-moment matrix by the semiclassical Liouvillian, Phys. Rev. A106, 013503 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, and F. Nori, Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. A100, 062131 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    I. I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, and F. Nori, Liouvillian exceptional points of any order in dissipative linearbosonicsystems: Coherencefunctionsandswitch- ing between PT and anti-PT symmetries, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033715 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Minganti, D

    F. Minganti, D. Huybrechts, C. Elouard, F. Nori, and I. I. Arkhipov, Creating and controlling excep- tional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians via homo- dyne Lindbladian invariance, Phys. Rev. A106, 042210 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Nakanishi and T

    Y. Nakanishi and T. Sasamoto,PT phase transition in open quantum systems with Lindblad dynamics, Phys. Rev. A105, 022219 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    S. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Par- ity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nature Materials18, 783 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Parto, Y

    M. Parto, Y. G. N. Liu, B. Bahari, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point, Nanophoton- ics 10, 403 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    H.Wang, X.Zhang, J.Hua, D.Lei, M.Lu,andY.Chen, Topological physics of non-Hermitian optics and pho- tonics: a review, Journal of Optics23, 123001 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking, Science 346, 972 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    A. Pick, B. Zhen, O. D. Miller, C. W. Hsu, F. Her- nandez, A. W. Rodriguez, M. Soljačić, and S. G. John- son, General theory of spontaneous emission near ex- ceptional points, Opt. Express25, 12325 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    W. Zhou, J. Liu, J. Zhu, D. Gromyko, C. Qiu, and L. Wu, Exceptional points unveiling quantum limit of fluorescence rates in non-Hermitian plexcitonic single- photon sources, APL Quantum1, 016110 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Z.-Z. Li, W. Chen, M. Abbasi, K. W. Murch, and K. B. Whaley, Speeding up entanglement generation by prox- imity to higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100202 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    P.-R. Han, F. Wu, X.-J. Huang, H.-Z. Wu, C.-L. Zou, W. Yi, M. Zhang, H. Li, K. Xu, D. Zheng, H. Fan, J. Wen, Z.-B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Exceptional en- tanglement phenomena: Non-Hermiticity meeting non- classicality, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 260201 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Z. Tang, T. Chen, X. Tang, and X. Zhang, Topologi- cally protected entanglement switching around excep- tional points, Light: Science & Applications 13, 167 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Applicationtomicrocavitysensorsforsingle-particlede- tection, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Applicationtomicrocavitysensorsforsingle-particlede- tection, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 203901 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Phys. Rev. A93, 033809 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Wiersig, Robustness of exceptional-point-based sen- sors against parametric noise: The role of Hamiltonian and Liouvillian degeneracies, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Robustness of exceptional-point-based sen- sors against parametric noise: The role of Hamiltonian and Liouvillian degeneracies, Phys. Rev. A101, 053846 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Zhang, W

    M. Zhang, W. Sweeney, C. W. Hsu, L. Yang, A. D. Stone, and L. Jiang, Quantum noise theory of excep- tional point amplifying sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 180501 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Anderson, M

    D. Anderson, M. Shah, and L. Fan, Clarification of the exceptional-point contribution to photonic sensing, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034059 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Waghela and S

    C. Waghela and S. Dasgupta, Simulation of exceptional- point systems on quantum computers for quantum sens- ing, AVS Quantum Science6, 014403 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Am-Shallem, R

    M. Am-Shallem, R. Kosloff, and N. Moiseyev, Excep- tional points for parameter estimation in open quantum systems: analysis of the Bloch equations, New Journal of Physics17, 113036 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    K.SunandW.Yi,EncirclingtheLiouvillianexceptional points: a brief review, AAPPS Bulletin34, 22 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Chimczak, A

    G. Chimczak, A. Kowalewska-Kudłaszyk, E. Lange, K. Bartkiewicz, and J. Peřina, The effect of thermal photons on exceptional points in coupled resonators, Scientific Reports13, 5859 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Hackenbroich, C

    G. Hackenbroich, C. Viviescas, and F. Haake, Quantum statisticsofoverlappingmodesinopenresonators,Phys. Rev. A68, 063805 (2003)

    2003

  63. [71]

    Franke, S

    S. Franke, S. Hughes, M. K. Dezfouli, P. T. Kristensen, K. Busch, A. Knorr, and M. Richter, Quantization of quasinormal modes for open cavities and plasmonic cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 213901 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-sourcePythonframeworkforthedynamicsofopen quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Stornati, A

    P. Stornati, A. Acin, U. Chabaud, A. Dauphin, V. Pa- rigi, and F. Centrone, Variational quantum simulation using non-Gaussian continuous-variable systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15919 10.48550/arXiv.2310.15919 (2023)

    2023 doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    Briegel and B.-G

    H.-J. Briegel and B.-G. Englert, Quantum optical mas- ter equations: The use of damping bases, Phys. Rev. A 47, 3311 (1993)

    1993

  67. [75]

    Briegel, B.-G

    H.-J. Briegel, B.-G. Englert, C. Ginzel, and A. Schenzle, 20 One-atom maser with a periodic and noisy pump: An application of damping bases, Phys. Rev. A49, 5019 (1994)

    1994

  68. [76]

    L. M. Arévalo-Aguilar and H. Moya-Cessa, Solution to the master equation for a quantized cavity mode, Quan- tum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B10, 671 (1998)

    1998

  69. [77]

    A. B. Klimov and J. L. Romero, An algebraic solution of Lindblad-type master equations, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics5, S316 (2003)

    2003

  70. [78]

    H.-X. Lu, J. Yang, Y.-D. Zhang, and Z.-B. Chen, Alge- braic approach to master equations with superoperator generators ofsu(1, 1) and su(2) Lie algebras, Phys. Rev. A 67, 024101 (2003)

    2003

  71. [79]

    B. A. Tay and T. Petrosky, Biorthonormal eigenbasis of aMarkovianmasterequationforthequantumBrownian motion, Journal of Mathematical Physics 49, 113301 (2008)

    2008

  72. [80]

    Ban, Optical Lindblad operator in non-equilibrium thermo field dynamics, Journal of Modern Optics56, 577 (2009)

    M. Ban, Optical Lindblad operator in non-equilibrium thermo field dynamics, Journal of Modern Optics56, 577 (2009)

    2009

  73. [81]

    Honda, H

    D. Honda, H. Nakazato, and M. Yoshida, Spectral res- olution of the Liouvillian of the Lindblad master equa- tion for a harmonic oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics 51, 072107 (2010)

    2010

  74. [82]

    B. A. Tay, Eigenvalues of the Liouvillians of quantum master equation for a harmonic oscillator, Physica A 556, 124768 (2020)

    2020

  75. [83]

    V. Y. Shishkov, E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, Perturbation theory for Lindblad superoperators for interacting open quan- tum systems, Phys. Rev. A102, 032207 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Benatti and R

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Entangling oscillators through environment noise, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and General39, 2689 (2006)

    2006

  77. [85]

    Prosen and T

    T. Prosen and T. H. Seligman, Quantization over boson operator spaces, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43, 392004 (2010)

    2010

  78. [86]

    A. D. Kiselev, R. Ali, and A. V. Rybin, Dynamics of characteristic and one-point correlation functions of multi-mode bosonic systems: Exactly solvable model, Symmetry 13, 2309 (2021)

    2021

  79. [87]

    S. M. Barnett and S. Stenholm, Spectral decomposition of the Lindblad operator, Journal of Modern Optics47, 2869 (2000)

    2000

  80. [88]

    Ban, Lie-algebra methods in quantum optics: The Liouville-space formulation, Phys

    M. Ban, Lie-algebra methods in quantum optics: The Liouville-space formulation, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5093 (1993)

    1993

  81. [89]

    M. S. Abdalla and M. A. Bashir, Lie algebra treatment of three coupled oscillators, Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B 10, 415 (1998)

    1998

  82. [90]

    B. A. Tay and T. Petrosky, Thermal symmetry of the Markovian master equation, Phys. Rev. A76, 042102 (2007)

    2007

  83. [91]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    2014

  84. [92]

    Nakazato, Y

    H. Nakazato, Y. Hida, K. Yuasa, B. Militello, A. Napoli, andA.Messina,SolutionoftheLindbladequationinthe Kraus representation, Phys. Rev. A74, 062113 (2006)

    2006

  85. [93]

    B. A. Tay, Solutions of generic bilinear master equations for a quantum oscillator — Positive and factorized con- ditions on stationary states, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications477, 42 (2017)

    2017

  86. [94]

    Teuber and S

    L. Teuber and S. Scheel, Solving the quantum mas- ter equation of coupled harmonic oscillators with Lie- algebra methods, Phys. Rev. A101, 042124 (2020)

    2020

  87. [95]

    McDonald and A

    A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exact solutions of inter- acting dissipative systems via weak symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 033602 (2022)

    2022

  88. [96]

    Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008)

    T. Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008)

    2008

  89. [97]

    Vadeiko, G

    I. Vadeiko, G. Miroshnichenko, A. Rybin, and Y. Tim- onen, Diagonal invariance and quasi-trapped states in the micromaser model based on n-atom clusters, Optics and Spectroscopy89, 300 (2000)

    2000

  90. [98]

    L. C. Biedenharn and J. D. Louck,Angular Momen- tum in Quantum Physics: Theory and Applications, En- cyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984)

    1984

  91. [99]

    Mandelstam and I

    L. Mandelstam and I. Tamm, The energy–time uncer- tainty relation in non-relativistic quantum mechanics, J. Phys. USSR9, 249 (1945)

    1945

  92. [100]

    Anandan and Y

    J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov, Geometry of quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 1697 (1990)

    1990

  93. [101]

    Uffink, The rate of evolution of a quantum state, American Journal of Physics61, 935 (1993)

    J. Uffink, The rate of evolution of a quantum state, American Journal of Physics61, 935 (1993)

    1993

  94. [102]

    Margolus and L

    N. Margolus and L. B. Levitin, The maximum speed of dynamical evolution, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 120, 188 (1998), proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Physics and Consumption

    1998

  95. [103]

    L. B. Levitin and T. Toffoli, Fundamental limit on the rate of quantum dynamics: The unified bound is tight, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 160502 (2009)

    2009

  96. [104]

    del Campo, I

    A. del Campo, I. L. Egusquiza, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Quantum speed limits in open system dynam- ics, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 050403 (2013)

    2013

  97. [105]

    Deffner and E

    S. Deffner and E. Lutz, Quantum speed limit for non- Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 010402 (2013)

    2013

  98. [106]

    M. M. Taddei, B. M. Escher, L. Davidovich, and R. L. de Matos Filho, Quantum speed limit for physical pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 050402 (2013)

    2013

  99. [107]

    D. P. Pires, M. Cianciaruso, L. C. Céleri, G. Adesso, andD.O.Soares-Pinto,Generalizedgeometricquantum speed limits, Phys. Rev. X6, 021031 (2016)

    2016

  100. [108]

    K. Lan, S. Xie, and X. Cai, Geometric quantum speed limits for Markovian dynamics in open quantum sys- tems, New Journal of Physics24, 055003 (2022)

    2022

  101. [109]

    D. C. Brody and B. Longstaff, Evolution speed of open quantumdynamics,PhysicalReviewResearch 1,033127 (2019)

    2019

  102. [110]

    Marian and T

    P. Marian and T. A. Marian, Quantum speed of evolu- tion in a Markovian bosonic environment, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022221 (2021)

    2021

  103. [111]

    A. D. Kiselev, R. Ali, and A. V. Rybin, Speed of evo- lution and correlations in multi-mode bosonic systems, Entropy 24, 1774 (2022)

    2022

  104. [112]

    Deffner and S

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum speed lim- its: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50, 453001 (2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    Herb and C

    K. Herb and C. L. Degen, Quantum speed limit in quan- tum sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 210802 (2024)

    2024

  106. [114]

    Farmanian and V

    A. Farmanian and V. Karimipour, Quantum speed lim- its for implementation of unitary transformations, Phys. 21 Rev. A110, 042611 (2024)

    2024

  107. [115]

    Mai and C.-s

    Z.-y. Mai and C.-s. Yu, Quantum speed limit in terms of coherence variations, Phys. Rev. A110, 042425 (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    Y. Wu, J. Yuan, C. Zhang, Z. Zhu, J. Deng, X. Zhang, P. Zhang, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, J. Huang, C. Song, H. Li, D.-W. Wang, H. Wang, and G. S. Agarwal, Testing the unified bounds of the quantum speed limit, Phys. Rev. A 110, 042215 (2024)

    2024

  109. [117]

    Cianciaruso, S

    M. Cianciaruso, S. Maniscalco, and G. Adesso, Role of non-Markovianity and backflow of information in the speed of quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. A96, 012105 (2017)

    2017

  110. [118]

    Haseli, The effect of homodyne-based feedback con- trol on quantum speed limit time, International Journal of Theoretical Physics59, 1927 (2020)

    S. Haseli, The effect of homodyne-based feedback con- trol on quantum speed limit time, International Journal of Theoretical Physics59, 1927 (2020)

    2020

  111. [119]

    J.Nie, Y.Liang, B.Wang,andX.Yang,Non-Markovian speedup dynamics in Markovian and non-Markovian channels, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 60, 2889 (2021)

    2021

  112. [120]

    Mirkin, F

    N. Mirkin, F. Toscano, and D. A. Wisniacki, Quantum- speed-limitboundsinanopenquantumevolution,Phys. Rev. A94, 052125 (2016)

    2016

  113. [121]

    Mirkin, M

    N. Mirkin, M. Larocca, and D. Wisniacki, Quan- tum metrology in a non-Markovian quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. A102, 022618 (2020)

    2020

  114. [122]

    D. P. Pires, E. R. deAzevedo, D. O. Soares-Pinto, F. Brito, and F. Brito, Experimental investigation of geometric quantum speed limits in an open quantum system, Communications Physics7, 142 (2024)

    2024

  115. [123]

    Wu and J.-H

    W. Wu and J.-H. An, Quantum speed limit of a noisy continuous-variable system, Phys. Rev. A106, 062438 (2022)

    2022

  116. [124]

    A. Z. Goldberg, P. de la Hoz, G. Björk, A. B. Klimov, M. Grassl, G. Leuchs, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Quantum concepts in optical polarization, Adv. Opt. Photon.13, 1 (2021)

    2021

  117. [125]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, I. I. Arkhipov, and F. Nori, Hybrid-Liouvillian formalism connecting exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians and Liouvillians via postselection of quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. A101, 062112 (2020)

    2020

  118. [126]

    Xu and Y

    J. Xu and Y. Guo, Unconventional steady states and topological phases in an open two-level non-Hermitian system, New Journal of Physics24, 053028 (2022)

    2022

  119. [127]

    Longhi, Quantum statistical signature ofPT symme- try breaking, Opt

    S. Longhi, Quantum statistical signature ofPT symme- try breaking, Opt. Lett.45, 1591 (2020)

    2020

  120. [128]

    Hernández-Sánchez, I

    L. Hernández-Sánchez, I. Ramos-Prieto, F. Soto- Eguibar, and H. M. Moya-Cessa, Exact solution for the interaction of two decaying quantized fields, Opt. Lett. 48, 5435 (2023)

    2023

  121. [129]

    D. N. Vavulin and A. A. Sukhorukov, Robust genera- tion of orbital-angular-momentum–entangled biphotons in twisted nonlinear-waveguide arrays, Physical Review A 96, 013812 (2017)

    2017

  122. [130]

    Minoguchi, P

    Y. Minoguchi, P. Rabl, and M. Buchhold, Continu- ous gaussian measurements of the free boson CFT: A model for exactly solvable and detectable measurement- induced dynamics, SciPost Phys.12, 009 (2022)

    2022

  123. [131]

    Y. A. Kazuki Yokomizo, Measurement-induced phase transition in free bosons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19768 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19768 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  124. [132]

    P. D. Blocher and K. Mølmer, Quantum regression theo- rem for out-of-time-ordered correlation functions, Phys. Rev. A99, 033816 (2019)

    2019

  125. [133]

    S. Khan, B. K. Agarwalla, and S. Jain, Quantum re- gression theorem for multi-time correlators: A detailed analysis in the Heisenberg picture, Phys. Rev. A106, 022214 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.