Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Optical library of Ga2O3 polymorphs

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that when Ga2O3 polymorphs are measured under identical conditions and analyzed with one uniform procedure, their optical bandgaps and emission features fall into a consistent order, giving materials researchers a…

desk verdict Useful first systematic cross-polymorph optical dataset for Ga2O3, with a genuine nano-FTIR addition, but the 'consistent scaling' claim rides on the Tauc direct-gap convention and one unexplained Eg value. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13987 v2 pith:AGLCMA2W submitted 2024-12-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Augustinas Galeckas , Adrian Cernescu , Anna Kaźmierczak-Ba{l}ata , Javier García-Fernández , Calliope Bazioti , Alexander Azarov , Junlei Zhao , Ji-Hyeon Park
show 8 more authors
Dae-Woo Jeon Halin Lee Won-Jae Lee Ray-Hua Horng Rui Zhu Zengxia Mei {O}ystein Prytz Andrej Kuznetsov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 78.20.-e78.55.-m78.30.-j
keywords galliumoxidepolymorphismopticalbandgapphotoluminescencediffusereflectancenano-FTIRUrbachenergyTaucanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a side-by-side optical dataset for the α, β, γ, and κ polymorphs of Ga2O3 plus amorphous Ga2Ox, all measured under identical conditions and reduced with a single analysis protocol. The central claim is that optical bandgaps and emission features scale consistently across these phases once methodological differences are removed: transmittance gives $E_g$ = 5.25 eV (α), 5.00 eV (β), 4.90 eV (γ), 5.00 eV (κ), and 5.10 eV (amorphous). The authors argue this ordering, along with Urbach energies, photoluminescence band positions, and near-field infrared fingerprints, can serve as a reference library for phase identification. The value for a reader is that scattered literature values, ranging from 4.4 to 5.6 eV for the same phases, are partly artifacts of technique and sample thickness rather than intrinsic material differences.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the deliberately identical measurement chain. Films of each polymorph are grown on c-plane sapphire (HVPE for α, β, κ; sputtering for amorphous; ion-irradiation-induced ordering for γ), so sample thickness and substrate are held comparable. Absorption is read twice, by transmittance and by diffuse reflectance, with the reflectance converted through the Kubelka–Munk function and both converted to Tauc plots using the direct-allowed transition exponent $n = 1/2$; bandgaps are the linear intercepts and Urbach energies the inverse slopes. Emission is read by 10 K photoluminescence and decomposed into Gaussian bands plus a configuration-coordinate self-trapped-hole model. Near-field nano-FTIR supplies the phonon-region fingerprint at ~10 nm resolution. This chain makes the polymorph comparison valid because only the crystal phase varies, not the experimental routine.

What would settle it

Measure the same films with a transition-model-free method—absolute absorption coefficient at a fixed value or spectroscopic ellipsometry—and check whether α still has the widest gap and γ the narrowest; or redo Tauc plots with the indirect exponent $n = 2$ and see if the ordering γ < β < κ < α survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a cross-correlated optical library: for the first time, the same thin-film platform, the same spectrometers, the same Tauc/Kubelka–Munk analysis, the same PL conditions, and the same nano-FTIR procedure are applied to all major Ga2O3 polymorphs. The resulting bandgaps form a consistent ladder, with corundum α the widest (5.25 eV), β and κ equal at 5.00 eV, amorphous Ga2Ox at 5.10 eV, and spinel γ the narrowest (4.90 eV) in transmittance. Urbach energies anticorrelate with the gap, amorphous material showing the most disorder, and the Stokes shift of the self-trapped-hole UV emission grows with the bandgap. Nano-FTIR further resolves distinct phonon-region signatures, including a γ/β double-polymorph interface, extending phase identification to the 10 nm scale.

Load-bearing premise

Every polymorph is treated as a direct-allowed semiconductor in the Tauc analysis, even though β-Ga2O3's fundamental gap is indirect and only about 30 meV below the direct gap; choosing a different transition order changes the extracted bandgaps, so the 'consistent scaling' is partly a product of this fixed analysis convention.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Table I gives device researchers concrete reference values: expecting ~5.25 eV for α, ~5.00 eV for β and κ, ~4.90 eV for γ, and ~5.10 eV for amorphous Ga2Ox in thin films.
  • Because bulk crystals read lower than films (e.g., β wafers at ~4.5 eV), literature scatter can be interpreted as a thickness effect rather than a materials mystery.
  • The anticorrelation of Urbach energy with bandgap means a single optical measurement can rank polymorphs by disorder, with amorphous Ga2Ox as the disordered endpoint.
  • The Stokes-shift scaling, from 1.37 eV in β to 2.25 eV in α, ties the intrinsic UV emission to the band edge and supports the self-trapped-hole picture across all crystalline phases.
  • Nano-FTIR fingerprints of individual polymorphs, including a γ-on-β bilayer, provide a nanoscale phase-identification tool for heterostructures and devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bandgap ordering is only as model-free as the Tauc choice: reanalyzing the same spectra with indirect-allowed exponents or derivative methods could shift γ and κ relative to each other, since their gaps differ by only ~0.1 eV.
  • The inverse $E_g$–$E_U$ correlation suggests a single disorder metric might predict both quantities; a testable extension would be to grade the same polymorph with varying irradiation or deposition conditions and check that $E_g$ and $E_U$ move along one curve.
  • The abstract promises δ-Ga2O3, but the measured library covers only α, β, γ, κ, and amorphous material; δ remains an unassigned row in any future reference table.
  • Nano-FTIR spectra, combined with the far-field data, could be turned into a classification scheme for unknown Ga2O3 samples, but the paper does not itself demonstrate such a classifier.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a systematic comparison of optical absorption, emission, and near-field infrared signatures of α-, β-, γ-, and κ-Ga2O3 thin films plus amorphous Ga2Ox, using transmittance, diffuse reflectance, photoluminescence, and nano-FTIR measurements under nominally identical conditions. The authors report optical bandgap and Urbach energy parameters from Tauc/Kubelka–Munk analysis (Table I), PL spectra and deconvolution (Tables II–III), and nano-FTIR spectra, and conclude that the optical bandgaps and emission features scale consistently across the polymorphs, providing a comparative library for phase identification.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper offers a valuable comparative dataset for Ga2O3 polymorphs, especially because the measurements are performed on a structurally verified sample set with unified data analysis. The combination of far-field (transmittance/DRS/PL) and near-field (nano-FTIR) signatures is a useful methodological contribution, and the observed ordering (β < γ < κ ≈ α, with amorphous near α) is physically plausible. The strengths are the systematic sample characterization by XRD/TEM, the explicit comparison of two absorption techniques, and the first nano-FTIR signatures for these polymorphs. However, the paper does not yet establish that the claimed scaling is independent of the Tauc transition-order assumption or provide enough statistical and data-availability support for a reference library.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Table I] The Tauc analysis is performed exclusively with the direct-allowed-transition convention (n=1/2) for all polymorphs, although §2.2 acknowledges that β-Ga2O3 has an indirect fundamental gap only ~30 meV below the direct gap and that indirect Tauc fits (n=2) yield systematically lower Eg values without quantifying them. Because the paper's central claim is that bandgaps and emission features 'scale consistently' across polymorphs, the ordering reported in Table I (β < γ < κ ≈ α) could be an artifact of the chosen transition order. Please report the indirect-Tauc (n=2) fits for all polymorphs and show whether the ordering and the Stokes-shift scaling in §2.3 persist when each polymorph is assigned its appropriate transition character.
  2. [§2.3] The Stokes-shift analysis uses a β-Ga2O3 bandgap of 4.65 eV, but this value appears nowhere in Table I (β film: 4.83 eV by DRS, 5.00 eV by transmittance) or Table S1 (bulk β: 4.50–4.70 eV). No source or derivation is provided for the 4.65 eV value. Since the claim that Stokes shift scales with Eg relies on this number, the analysis needs to be redone with a traceable Eg value from Table I (or from cited literature), and the consistency of the scaling should be re-evaluated.
  3. [Table I and §2.2] Each polymorph is represented by a single sample, and the two independent techniques disagree by up to 0.3 eV for γ-Ga2O3 (4.60 eV DRS vs 4.90 eV transmittance). The paper presents no sample-to-sample variability or combined uncertainty estimate, so it is unclear whether the observed ordering is statistically significant. For a reference library intended for phase identification, the authors should either measure replicate samples or at least provide a propagated uncertainty that accounts for both technique and sample variability.
  4. [Data Availability Statement] The raw spectra (transmittance, DRS, PL, nano-FTIR) are not deposited in a public repository; the Data Availability Statement only offers them 'upon reasonable request.' Because the paper's main deliverable is a reference dataset, the absence of raw data prevents independent verification of the Tauc fits, PL deconvolutions, and nano-FTIR comparisons. I recommend depositing the processed and raw spectra in a permanent repository, ideally with the fitting routines, before publication.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists α, β, γ, δ, and κ polymorphs, but the manuscript studies α, β, γ, κ, and amorphous Ga2Ox and does not include δ-Ga2O3; please correct the enumeration.
  2. [Figure 5 caption] The caption refers to 'Ge2O3 polymorphs' in the inset description; this should be Ga2O3.
  3. [Section 2.1] The text uses 'SEAD patterns' where the intended abbreviation is SAED (selected area electron diffraction).
  4. [Tables II and III] Table III is presented before Table II in the text, which will confuse readers; please reorder the tables and their citations.
  5. [Section 4.2] The PL excitation photon energy of 5.04 eV (246 nm) is below the nominal bandgap of α-Ga2O3 (5.15–5.25 eV in Table I); the authors should state whether the excitation is resonant with the Urbach tail or whether sub-gap excitation affects the relative PL intensities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an experimental optical library whose bandgap, Urbach, and emission parameters are read from raw spectra under stated conventions and cross-checked against independent literature values.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental characterization study rather than a derivation: bandgaps are extracted from raw transmittance and diffuse-reflectance spectra by a fixed Tauc extrapolation convention, and photoluminescence peak positions are read from measured spectra. The resulting Eg, EU, PP, and Stokes-shift values are reported as data, and the claimed 'consistent scaling' is an empirical summary of those measurements, not a quantity forced by fitting to the target result. The direct-allowed Tauc convention (n=1/2) is a stated analysis choice, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that an indirect-Tauc convention would systematically shift the values; this is a methodological robustness caveat, not a circular step. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. 14, 17, 68) provide sample provenance and prior synthesis routes, not the optical conclusions, and the optical signatures are cross-checked against independent literature bandgap ranges and far-field FTIR phonon modes. The Stokes shift is definitionally Eg minus emission peak position, but because peak positions are measured independently and vary across polymorphs, the reported ES-Eg correlation is not a tautology. A minor internal inconsistency exists in Section 2.3, where Eg = 4.65 eV for beta-Ga2O3 is used while Table I lists 4.83 and 5.00 eV, but this is a consistency and reproducibility issue rather than evidence that the central result reduces to its own inputs. Overall, no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reported Eg and EU values are linear-fit intercepts and slopes of the measured spectra; they are the data products, not adjustable model parameters. The PL configuration-coordinate fits (Table III) are descriptive and not used for the central bandgap scaling claim. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption All polymorphs are analyzed with the Tauc relation for direct allowed transitions (n=1/2); the intercept of [αhν]^2 vs hν defines Eg.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 around Figure 3; the paper acknowledges β-Ga2O3 has a predicted indirect gap, so the uniform direct-gap treatment is a convention that affects absolute Eg values.
  • domain assumption In diffuse reflectance, the Kubelka-Munk function F(R) is proportional to the absorption coefficient (scattering factor S assumed constant), so Tauc analysis is applicable to F(R).
    Section 2.2, 'Assuming S is a constant, K-M function is directly proportional to absorption coefficient'.
  • domain assumption Each measured sample is a single-phase, representative example of its polymorph.
    Supported by XRD and TEM in Section 2.1, but only one sample per polymorph; the γ film is made by ion irradiation of β-Ga2O3 and the κ film is 150 nm thick, so comparability is imperfect.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical library of Ga2O3 polymorphs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AGLCMA2W

@misc{pith2026241213987,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical library of Ga2O3 polymorphs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AGLCMA2W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13987}
}
read the original abstract

Gallium oxide is an emerging material of interest due to its unique combination of functional properties and the existence of multiple polymorphs - {\alpha}, {\beta}, {\gamma}, {\delta}, and {\kappa} - each exhibiting distinct characteristics arising from their different lattice symmetries. Optical properties are particularly important, as they determine potential device applications and enable phase identification. However, direct comparison of optical signatures, including key parameters such as bandgaps, is hindered by inconsistent, sparse, or even missing data in the literature. To address this issue, in the present work we systematically cross-correlate optical emission and absorption features of {\alpha}, {\beta}, {\gamma}, {\delta}, and {\kappa} thin films, as well as differently oriented {\beta}-phase bulk crystals and {\gamma}/{\beta} double polymorph structures. We demonstrate that optical bandgaps and emission features scale consistently across the polymorphs when methodological uncertainties are minimized by applying identical experimental conditions and unified analysis procedures to a structurally similar set of thin film samples. In addition, we extend conventional far field optical phase identification to the nanoscale by reporting near field optical signatures of Ga2O3 polymorphs via nano FTIR. Overall, the present dataset provides a comprehensive reference of near- and far-field optical polymorph signatures to support ongoing multidisciplinary research on Ga2O3.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13987 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of the α, β, γ, and κ Ga2O3 polymorphs used in this study. Note that the data for amorphous (a-Ga2Ox) phase in panel (c) is hidden in the background due to its low intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison of (a) optical bandgap and (b) Urbach energy parameters of α, β, γ, κ Ga2O3 polymorphs and amorphous Ga2OX obtained from diffuse-reflectance and transmittance measurements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. displays PL spectra measured at 10K of α, β, γ, κ Ga2O3 polymorphs and amorphous a-Ga2Ox. Here, top panel (Figure 5a) presents normalized PL spectra of the polymorphs for a direct comparison of their emission signatures, whereas the original (raw) spectra are plotted on a semi-logarithmic scale in Figure 5b for relating their quantum efficiencies. The dominant UV emission of the α-, β-, γ- and κ-Ga2O3 polymorphs in … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Nanoscale structural and spectroscopic analysis of the double -Ga2O3 polymorph structure by nano-FTIR: (a) 2D representation of cross-sectional nano-FTIR line scan over 1500 nm with 50 nm step. (b) Near-field optical signatures of  and  polymorphs represented by a…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Ions leaving no tracks

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gamma-Ga2O3 shows no swift-heavy-ion tracks, explained by fast disorder recovery via multiple lattice configurations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Introduction Gallium oxide (Ga 2O3) is an ultra -wide bandgap semiconductor with great potential for power electronics and UV photonic applications.[1,2] The technological importance of Ga2O3 is further augmented by the existence of several polymorphs, including monoclinic (β), rhombohedral (α), defective spinel (γ), and orthorhombic ( κ), eac h possessin...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Results and Discussions 2.1. Structural properties Figure 1 shows XRD 2Θ scans with indexed reflections of the α-, β- , γ and κ-Ga2O3 thin films on sapphire (see panels a-c) as well as the data collected for (010) β-Ga2O3 wafer and γ/β-Ga2O3 double polymorph structure in panel (d). Notably, the displayed XRD patterns validate both the crystalline quality ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Conclusion In this work, we collected data that allows for a reliable comparison of the optical signatures of different Ga2O3 polymorphs. To achieve this, we cross-correlated optical emission and absorption signatures in a systematic set of thin film samples of α-, β-, γ-, and κ-phases, complemented by differently oriented β-phase bulk crystals and γ/β do...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Experimental Section 4.1. Samples The representative samples of monoclinic (β), rhombohedral (α), defective spinel ( γ), and orthorhombic ( κ) Ga 2O3 polymorphs studied in this work comprise thin films grown on sapphire, disorder -induced ordered layers and bulk single crystals acquired from different sources as described in what follows. The samples were...

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    A review of Ga 2O3 materials, processing, and devices

    S. J. Pearton, J. Yang, P. H. Cary IV, F. Ren, J. Kim, M. J. Tadjer, and M. A. Mastro, "A review of Ga 2O3 materials, processing, and devices", Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 011301 (2018). DOI: 10.1063/1.5006941

    doi:10.1063/1.5006941 2018

  6. [6]

    Higashiwaki and S

    M. Higashiwaki and S. Fujita, Gallium Oxide: Materials Properties, Crystal Growth, and Devices (Springer Nature, 2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Review of polymorphous Ga2O3 materials and their solar - blind photodetector applications,

    X. Hou, Y. Zou, M. Ding, Y. Qin, Z. Zhang, X. Ma, P. Tan, S. Yu, X. Zhou, X. Zhao, “Review of polymorphous Ga2O3 materials and their solar - blind photodetector applications,” J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys. 54, 043001 (2021), DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/abbb45

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/abbb45 2021

  8. [8]

    Schottky barrier diodes of corundum -structured gallium oxide showing on-resistance of 0.1 mΩ·cm2 grown by MIST EPITAXY

    M. Oda, R. Tokuda, H. Kambara, T. Tanikawa, T. Sasaki and T. Hitora, "Schottky barrier diodes of corundum -structured gallium oxide showing on-resistance of 0.1 mΩ·cm2 grown by MIST EPITAXY", Appl. Phys. Express 9 021101 (2016), DOI: 10.7567/APEX.9.021101

    work page doi:10.7567/apex.9.021101 2016

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Phase diagram and polarization of stable phases of (Ga1 -xInx)2O3

    M. B. Maccioni and V. Fiorentini, "Phase diagram and polarization of stable phases of (Ga1 -xInx)2O3", Appl. Phys. Express 9 , 041102 (2016). DOI: 10.7567/APEX.9.041102

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    Crystal Structure and Ferroelectric Properties of ε -Ga2O3 Films Grown on (0001)-Sapphire

    F. Mezzadri, G. Calestani, F. Boschi, D. Del monte, M. Bosi, and R. Fornari, "Crystal Structure and Ferroelectric Properties of ε -Ga2O3 Films Grown on (0001)-Sapphire", Inorg. Chem. 55, 12079 (2016). DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02244

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    First-principle calculations of electronic structures and polar properties of (κ,ε) -Ga2O3

    J. Kim, D. Tahara, Y. Miura, and B. G. Kim, "First-principle calculations of electronic structures and polar properties of (κ,ε) -Ga2O3", Appl. Phys. Express 11, 061101 (2018). DOI 10.7567/APEX.11.061101

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Epitaxial engineering of polar ε -Ga2O3 for tunable two-dimensional electron gas at the h eterointerface

    S. B. Cho and R. Mishra, "Epitaxial engineering of polar ε -Ga2O3 for tunable two-dimensional electron gas at the h eterointerface", Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 , 162101 (2018). DOI: 10.1063/1.5019721

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    Highly tunable, polarization-engineered two-dimensional electron gas in ε-AlGaO3/ε- Ga2O3 heterostructures

    P. Ranga, S. B. Cho, R. Mishra, and S. Krishnamoorthy, "Highly tunable, polarization-engineered two-dimensional electron gas in ε-AlGaO3/ε- Ga2O3 heterostructures", Appl. Phys. Express 13, 061009 (2020). DOI: 10.35848/1882-0786/ab9168

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Deep -ultraviolet transparent conductive β-Ga2O3 thin films

    M. Orita, H. Ohta, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, "Deep -ultraviolet transparent conductive β-Ga2O3 thin films", Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4166 (2000). DOI: 10.1063/1.1330559

    2000 doi

  7. [15]

    Gallium oxide solar -blind ultraviolet photodetectors: a review

    J. Xu, W. Zheng, and F. Huang, "Gallium oxide solar -blind ultraviolet photodetectors: a review", J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 8753 (2019) . DOI: 10.1039/C9TC02055A

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Vacuum -ultraviolet photodetectors

    L. Jia, W. Zheng, and F. Huang, "Vacuum -ultraviolet photodetectors", PhotoniX 1, 22 (2020). DOI: 10.1186/s43074-020-00022-w

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    An Overview of the Ultrawide Bandgap Ga2O3 Semiconductor-Based Schottky Barrier Diode for Power Electronics Application

    H. Xue, Q. He, G. Jian, S. Long, T. Pang, an d M. Liu, "An Overview of the Ultrawide Bandgap Ga2O3 Semiconductor-Based Schottky Barrier Diode for Power Electronics Application", Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 290 (2018). DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2712-1

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Disorder -induced ordering in gallium oxide polymorphs

    A. Azarov, C. Bazioti, V. Venkatachalapathy, P. Vajeeston, E. Monakhov, and A. Kuznetsov, “Disorder -induced ordering in gallium oxide polymorphs”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 015704 (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.015704

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    Structural transition and recovery of Ge implanted β -Ga2O3

    E. A. Anber, D. Foley, A. C. Lang, J. Nathaniel, J. L. Hart, M. J. Tadjer, K. D. Hobart, S. Pearton, and M. L. Taheri, “Structural transition and recovery of Ge implanted β -Ga2O3”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 152101 (2020). DOI: 10.1063/5.0022170

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    Atomic-scale characterization of structural damage and recovery in Sn ion-implanted β-Ga2O3

    T. Yoo, X. Xia, F. Ren, A. Jacobs, M. J. Tadjer, S. Pearton, and H. Kim “Atomic-scale characterization of structural damage and recovery in Sn ion-implanted β-Ga2O3”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 072111 (2022). DOI: 10.1063/5.0099915

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    Universal radiation tolerant semiconductor

    A. Azarov, J. G. Fernández, J. Zhao, J. Zhao, F. Djurabekova, H. He, R. He, Ø. Prytz, L. Vines, U. Bektas, P. Chekhonin, N. Klingner, G. Hlawacek, A. Kuznetsov, “Universal radiation tolerant semiconductor”, Nat Commun 14, 4855 (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41467- 023-40588-0

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Proton damage effects in double polymorph γ/β-Ga2O3 diodes

    A. Y. Polyakov, A. A. Vasilev, A. I. Kochkova, I. V. Shchemerov, E. B. Yakimov, A. V. Miakonkikh, A. V. Chernykh, P. B. Lagov, Y. S. Pavlov, A. S. Doroshkevich, R. Sh. Isaev, A. A. Romanov, L. A. Alexanyan, N. Matros, A. Azarov, A. Kuznetsov and S. Pearton, "Proton damage effe...

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Thermal conductivity of (11 of 17) double polymorph Ga2O3 structures

    A. Abdullaev, K. Sekerbayev, A. Azarov, V. Venkatachalapathy, V. S. Chauhan, Z. Utegulov, and A. Kuznetsov, "Thermal conductivity of (11 of 17) double polymorph Ga2O3 structures", APL Mater. 12, 08 1108 (2024). DOI: 10.1063/5.0213985

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Amorphous -Ga2O3 Optoelectronic Synapses with Ultra -low Energy Consumption

    R. Zhu, H. L. Liang, S. G. Hu, Y. Wang, Z. X. Mei, "Amorphous -Ga2O3 Optoelectronic Synapses with Ultra -low Energy Consumption", Adv. Electron. Mater. 2022, 8, 2100741. DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202100741

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    Non-volatile optoelectronic memory based on a photosensitive dielectric

    R. Zhu, H. Liang, S. Liu, Y. Yuan, X. Wang, F. C. Ling, A. Kuznetsov, G. Zhang, and Z. X Mei, "Non-volatile optoelectronic memory based on a photosensitive dielectric", Nature Communications 14, 5396 (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40938-y

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Border Trap - Enhanced Ga2O3 Nonvolatile Optoelectronic Memory

    Y. Zhang, R. Zhu, W. Huo, H. Liang, a nd Z. X. Mei, "Border Trap - Enhanced Ga2O3 Nonvolatile Optoelectronic Memory", Nano Letters 24, 14398 (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04235

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    A strategic review on gallium oxide based deep-ultraviolet photodetectors: Recent progress and future prospects,

    D. Kaur and M. Kumar, “A strategic review on gallium oxide based deep-ultraviolet photodetectors: Recent progress and future prospects,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 9, no. 9, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 2002160, DOI: 10.1002/ adom.202002160

    2021

  20. [28]

    Review of gallium-oxide-based solar- blind ultraviolet photodetectors,

    X. Chen, F. Ren, S. Gu, and J. Ye, “Review of gallium-oxide-based solar- blind ultraviolet photodetectors,” Photon. Res. 7 (4), 381 (2019). DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.7.000381

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Bandgap, mobility, dielectric constant, and Baliga’s figure of merit of 4H-SiC, GaN, and β-Ga2O3 from 300 to 620 K

    L. Cheng, J. -Y. Yang, and W. Zheng, “Bandgap, mobility, dielectric constant, and Baliga’s figure of merit of 4H-SiC, GaN, and β-Ga2O3 from 300 to 620 K”, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 4 (8), 4140 (2022). DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c00766

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Photo - physics of β-Ga2O3: Phonon polaritons, exciton polaritons, free-carrier absorption, and band -edge absorption,

    L. Cheng, Y. Wu, W. Zhong, D. Chen, H. Qi, and W. Zheng, “Photo - physics of β-Ga2O3: Phonon polaritons, exciton polaritons, free-carrier absorption, and band -edge absorption,” J. Appl. Phys. 132, 185704 (2022). DOI: 10.1063/5.0118843

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Strong electron –phonon coupling in β -Ga2O3: A huge broadening of self -trapped exciton emission and a significant red shift of the direct bandgap,

    L. Cheng, Y. Zhu, W. Wang, and W. Zheng, “Strong electron –phonon coupling in β -Ga2O3: A huge broadening of self -trapped exciton emission and a significant red shift of the direct bandgap,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 3053 (2022). DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00682

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Valence band ordering in β -Ga2O3 studied by polarized transmittance and reflectance spectroscopy

    T. Onuma, S. Saito, K. Sasaki, T. Masui, T. Yamaguchi, T. Honda, and M. Higashiwaki, "Valence band ordering in β -Ga2O3 studied by polarized transmittance and reflectance spectroscopy", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 112601 (2015). DOI: 10.7567/JJAP.54.112601

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Heteroepitaxy of Corundum-Structured α-Ga2O3 Thin Films on α -Al2O3 Substrates by Ultrasonic Mist Chemical Vapor Deposition

    D. Shinohara and S. F ujita, "Heteroepitaxy of Corundum-Structured α-Ga2O3 Thin Films on α -Al2O3 Substrates by Ultrasonic Mist Chemical Vapor Deposition", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47 7311 (2008). DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.47.7311

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    Band gap of corundumlike 𝛼−Ga2O3 determined by absorption and ellipsometry

    A. Segura, L. Artús, R. Cuscó, R. Goldhahn, and M. Feneberg, “Band gap of corundumlike 𝛼−Ga2O3 determined by absorption and ellipsometry”, Phys. Rev. Materials 1, 024604 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.024604

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    The electronic structure of ε-Ga2O3

    M. Pavesi, F. Fabbri, F. Boschi, G. Piacentini, A. Baraldi, M. Bosi, E. Gombia, A. Parisini, R. Fornari, "The electronic structure of ε-Ga2O3", Mater. Chem. Phys. 205, 502 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.11.023

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    Epitaxial growth of phase-pure ε-Ga2O3 by halide vapor phase epitaxy

    Y. Oshima, E. G. Villora, Y. Matsushita, S. Yamamoto, and K. Shimamura, "Epitaxial growth of phase-pure ε-Ga2O3 by halide vapor phase epitaxy", J. Appl. Phys. 118 , 085301 (2015). DOI: 10.1063/1.4929417

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Engineering shallow and deep level defects in κ -Ga2O3 thin films: comparing metal-organic vapour phase epitaxy to molecular beam epitaxy and the effect of annealing treatments

    P. Mazzolini, J.B. Varley, A. Parisini, A. Sacchi, M. Pavesi, A. Bosio, M. Bosi, L. Seravalli, B. M. Janzen, M. N. Marggraf, N. Bernhardt, M. R. Wagner, A. Ardenghi , O. Bierwagen, A. Falkenstein, J. Kler, R.A. De Souza, M. Martin, F. Mezzadri, C. Borelli, R. Fornari, "Enginee...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Epitaxial growth of γ-Ga2O3 films by mist chemical vapor deposition,

    T. Oshima, T. Nakazono, A. Mukai, and A. Ohtomo, “Epitaxial growth of γ-Ga2O3 films by mist chemical vapor deposition,” J. Cryst. Growth 359, 60 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.08.025

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    Tackling Disorder in γ -Ga2O3

    L. E. Ratcliff, T. Oshima, F. Nippert, B. M. Janzen, E. Kluth, R. Goldhahn, M. Feneberg, P. Mazzolini, O. Bierwagen, C. Wouters, M. Nofal, M. Albrecht, J. E. N. Swallow, L. A. H. Jones, P. K. Thakur, T.-L. Lee, C. Kalha, C. Schlueter, T. D. Veal, J. B. Varley, M. R. Wagner, A....

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Theoretical and experimental investigation of optical absorption anisotropy in β - Ga2O3

    F. Ricci, F. Boschi, A. Baraldi, A. Filippetti, M. Higashiwaki, A. Kuramata, V. Fiorentini, and R. Fornari, “Theoretical and experimental investigation of optical absorption anisotropy in β - Ga2O3”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 224005 (2016). DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/22/224005

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    Anisotropy of optical transitions in β -Ga2O3 investigated by polarized photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy

    M. Meißner, N. Bernhardt, F. Nippert, B.M. Janzen, Z. Galazka, and M.R. W agner, "Anisotropy of optical transitions in β -Ga2O3 investigated by polarized photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy", Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 152102 (2024). DOI: 10.1063/5.0189751

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Revisiting the optical bandgap of semiconductors and the proposal of a unified methodology to its determination

    A. R. Zanatta, "Revisiting the optical bandgap of semiconductors and the proposal of a unified methodology to its determination", Sci. Rep. 9, 11225 (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47670-y

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    T. P. McLean, The absorption edge spectrum of semiconductors. Progress in Semiconductors, 5, 55–102 (1960)

    1960

  36. [44]

    Optical Properties And Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium

    J. Tauc, R. Grigorovici, A. Van cu, "Optical Properties And Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium", Phys. Status Solidi B, 15, 627 (1966). DOI: 10.1002/pssb.19660150224

    1966 doi

  37. [45]

    The Long-Wavelength Edge of Photographic Sensitivity and Electronic Absorption of Solids

    F. Urbach, “ The Long-Wavelength Edge of Photographic Sensitivity and Electronic Absorption of Solids”, Phys. Rev. 92, 1324 (1953). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.92.1324

    1953 doi

  38. [46]

    Nanoscale ultraviolet photodetectors based on onedimensional metal oxide nanostructures

    W. Tian, H. Lu, and L. Li, "Nanoscale ultraviolet photodetectors based on onedimensional metal oxide nanostructures", Nano Res. 8, 382 (2015). DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0661-2

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Structural and optical properties of β -Ga2O3 thin films grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy

    S. Ghose, M. S. Rahman, J. S. Rojas-Ramirez, M. Caro, R. Droopad, A. Arias, and N. Nedev, "Structural and optical properties of β -Ga2O3 thin films grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 34, 02L109 (2016). DOI: 10.1116/1.4942045

    2016 doi

  40. [49]

    T he ultraviolet luminescence of β-galliumsesquioxide

    T. Harwig, F. Kellendonk, and S. Slappendel, “T he ultraviolet luminescence of β-galliumsesquioxide”, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 39, 675 (1978). DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(78)90183-X

    1978 doi

  41. [50]

    Role of self-trapping in luminescence and p-type conductivity of wide-band- gap oxides,

    J. B. Varley, A. Janotti, C. Franchini, and C. G. Van de Walle, “Role of self-trapping in luminescence and p-type conductivity of wide-band- gap oxides,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 081109(R) (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.081109

    2012 doi

  42. [51]

    Self - trapped hole and impurity -related broad luminescence in β -Ga2O3

    Y. K. Frodason, K. M. Johansen, L. Vines, and J. B. Varley, "Self - trapped hole and impurity -related broad luminescence in β -Ga2O3" J. Appl. Phys. 127, 075701 (2020). DOI: 10.1063/1.5140742

    2020 doi

  43. [53]

    Structural and optical properties of pulsed -laser deposited crystalline β -Ga2O3 thin films on silicon,

    Y. Berencen, Y. Xie, M. Wang, S. Pruncal , L. Rebohle, and S. Zhou, “Structural and optical properties of pulsed -laser deposited crystalline β -Ga2O3 thin films on silicon,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34(3), 035001 (2019). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6641/aafc90

    2019 doi

  44. [54]

    First - Principles Calculations of Luminescence Spectrum Line Shapes for Defects in Semiconductors: The Example of GaN and ZnO

    A. Alkauskas, J. L. Lyons, D. Steiauf, and C. G . Van de Walle, “First - Principles Calculations of Luminescence Spectrum Line Shapes for Defects in Semiconductors: The Example of GaN and ZnO”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 267401 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.267401

    2012 doi

  45. [55]

    Tutorial: Defects in semiconductors - Combining experiment and theory

    A. Alkauskas, M. D. McCluskey, and C. G . Van de Walle, “Tutorial: Defects in semiconductors - Combining experiment and theory”, J. Appl. Phys. 119, 181101 (2016). DOI: 10.1063/1.4948245 (12 of 17)

    2016 doi

  46. [56]

    Theory of light absorption and non-radiative transitions in F-centres

    K. Huang and A. Rhys, “Theory of light absorption and non-radiative transitions in F-centres”, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 204, 406 (1950). DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1950.0184

    1950

  47. [57]

    Temperature-dependence of X -ray excited luminescence of β-Ga2O3 single crystals

    H. Tang, N. He, Z. Zhu, M. Gu, B. Liu, J. Xu, M. Xu, L. Chen, J. Liu, X. Ouyang, "Temperature-dependence of X -ray excited luminescence of β-Ga2O3 single crystals", Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 071904 (2019). DOI: 10.1063/1.5110535

    2019 doi

  48. [58]

    Incident wavelength and polarization dependence of spectral shifts in β -Ga2O3 UV photoluminescence,

    Y. Wang, P. T. Dickens, J. B. Varley, X. Ni, E. Lotubai, and S. Sprawls, “Incident wavelength and polarization dependence of spectral shifts in β -Ga2O3 UV photoluminescence,” Sci. Rep. 8(1), 18075 (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36676-7

    2018 doi

  49. [59]

    Correlation between blue luminescence intensity and resistivity in β -Ga2O3 single crystals,

    T. Onuma, S. Fukioka, T. Yamaguchi, M. Sasaki, T. Masui, and T. Honda, “Correlation between blue luminescence intensity and resistivity in β -Ga2O3 single crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 041910 (2013). DOI: 10.1063/1.4816759

    2013 doi

  50. [60]

    Photoluminescence properties of β -Ga2O3 thin films produced by ion-plasma sputtering,

    O. M. Burdon, B. O . Bordun, I. Y. Kukharskyy, and I. I. Medvid, “Photoluminescence properties of β -Ga2O3 thin films produced by ion-plasma sputtering,” J. Appl. Spectrosc. 84(1), 46–51 (2017). DOI: 10.1007/s10812-017-0425-3

    2017 doi

  51. [61]

    Optical spectroscopy study on β-Ga2O3,

    E. G. Villora, M. Yamaga, T. Inoue, G. Yabasi, Y. Masui, T. Sugawara, and T. Fukuda, “Optical spectroscopy study on β-Ga2O3,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41(6A), L622 (2002). DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.41.L622

    2002 doi

  52. [62]

    Origin of photoluminescence in β -Ga2O3,

    Q. D. Ho, T. Fraunenheim, and P. Deak, “Origin of photoluminescence in β -Ga2O3,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 115163 (2018). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.115163

    2018 doi

  53. [63]

    Red luminescence in H -doped β -Ga2O3,

    T. Huynh, E. Chikoidze, C. Irvine, M. Zakria, Y. Dumont, F. Teherani, E. Sandana, P. Bove, D. Rogers, M. Phillips, and C. Ton -That, “Red luminescence in H -doped β -Ga2O3,” Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 085201 (2020). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.085201

    2020 doi

  54. [64]

    Origin of red emission in β -Ga2O3 analyzed by cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence spectroscopy,

    N. Gunasekar, H. MacIntyre, S. Subashchandran, P. Edwards, R. Martin, K. Daivasigamani, K. Sasaki, and A. Kuramata, “Origin of red emission in β -Ga2O3 analyzed by cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence spectroscopy,” Ph ys. Status Solidi B 258, 2000465 (2021). DOI: 10.1002...

    2021 doi

  55. [65]

    Green luminescence in Mg -doped GaN

    M. A. Reshchikov, D. O. Demchenko, J. D. McNamara, S. Fernandez - Garrido, and R. Calarco, "Green luminescence in Mg -doped GaN", Phys. Rev. B 90, 035207 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035207

    2014 doi

  56. [66]

    Nano -FTIR Absorption Spectroscopy of Molecular Fingerprints at 20 nm Spatial Resolution

    F. Huth, A. Govyadinov, S. Amarie, W. Nuansing, F. Keilmann, R. Hillenbrand, "Nano -FTIR Absorption Spectroscopy of Molecular Fingerprints at 20 nm Spatial Resolution", Nano Lett. 12, 8, 3973 (2012). DOI: 10.1021/nl301159v

    2012 doi

  57. [67]

    Detection and Signal Processing for Near -Field Nanoscale Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

    J. M. L arson, H. A. Bechtel, R. Kostecki, “Detection and Signal Processing for Near -Field Nanoscale Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy”, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2406643 (2024). DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202406643

    2024 doi

  58. [68]

    The formation and microstructural properties of uniform α -GaOOH particles and their calcination products

    S. Krehula, M. Risti, S. Kubuki, Y. Iida, M. Fabián, S . Musi, "The formation and microstructural properties of uniform α -GaOOH particles and their calcination products", J. Alloys Comp. 620, 217 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.134

    2015 doi

  59. [69]

    Catalytic properties of niobium and gallium oxide systems supported on MCM-41 type materials

    I. Nowak, M. Misiewicz, M. Ziolek, A. Kubacka, V. C. Coberán, B. Sulikowski, "Catalytic properties of niobium and gallium oxide systems supported on MCM-41 type materials", Appl. Catal. A 325, 328–335 (2007). DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.02.029

    2007 doi

  60. [70]

    A comparative study of β -Ga2O3 nanowires grown on different substrates using CVD technique

    S. Kumar, C. Tessarek, S. Christiansen, R. Singh, "A comparative study of β -Ga2O3 nanowires grown on different substrates using CVD technique", J. Alloys Compd. 587, 812 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.165

    2014 doi

  61. [71]

    MOCVD-grown Ga2O3 thin films for polarization- sensitive infrared photonics

    S. A. Dereshgi, J. Lee, D. Ceneda, M. C. Larciprete, M. Centini, M. Razeghi, K. Aydin, "MOCVD-grown Ga2O3 thin films for polarization- sensitive infrared photonics", APL Mater. 12 011125 (2024). DOI: 10.1063/5.0177705

    2024 doi

  62. [72]

    Optimization of the growth temperature of α-Ga2O3 epilayers grown by halide vapor phase epitaxy,

    H. Son and D.-W. Jeon, “Optimization of the growth temperature of α-Ga2O3 epilayers grown by halide vapor phase epitaxy,” J. Alloys Compd. 773, 631 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.230

    2019 doi

  63. [73]

    Contribution to the Optics of Pigments

    P. Kubelka, F. A. Munk, "Contribution to the Optics of Pigments", Z. Technol. Phys. 12, 593 (1931)

    1931

  64. [74]

    How To Correctly Determine the Band Gap Energy of Modified Semiconductor Photocatalysts Based on UV–Vis Spectra

    P. Makuła, M. Pacia, and W. Macyk, "How To Correctly Determine the Band Gap Energy of Modified Semiconductor Photocatalysts Based on UV–Vis Spectra", J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 6814 (2018). DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892 (13 of 17) Supplementary Material Optical library of Ga2O...

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.