Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Inflation without an Inflaton

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Gravitational waves can seed cosmic structure without an inflaton.

desk verdict Promising idea with a load-bearing gap: the computed scale-invariant spectrum lives in a branch without the amplification the paper needs to match observations, and adding that amplification breaks scale invariance. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14265 v1 pith:JLWMHXGV submitted 2024-12-18 astro-ph.CO hep-th

Daniele Bertacca , Raul Jimenez , Sabino Matarrese , Angelo Ricciardone This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords inflationwithoutinflatondeSitterspacetimetensor-inducedscalarperturbationssecond-ordercosmologicalperturbationtheoryprimordialpowerspectrumgravitationalwavesgracefulexitnearscale-invariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the primordial scalar fluctuations that seeded galaxies and cosmic structure can be generated in a pure de Sitter phase—an exponentially expanding spacetime—without any inflaton scalar field. In this scenario, quantum tensor fluctuations (gravitational waves) from the vacuum source scalar metric perturbations at second order, and the resulting power spectrum is nearly scale invariant, as observations require. The authors derive conditions under which these second-order scalar modes dominate over the linear tensor modes, and they argue that the natural instability of de Sitter space ends inflation through a transition to radiation domination. If correct, the framework removes the model dependence of choosing an inflaton potential and makes inflation a theory rather than a menu of models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the second-order scalar equation for $\varphi_2$ sourced by quadratic combinations of first-order tensor perturbations (gravitational waves). The decisive factor is the superhorizon growth $(c_s k |\eta|)^{3(c_s^2 - w)}$ in Eq. (20): with $w - c_s^2 > 0$, the induced scalar modes grow relative to the tensor modes, and with $w = c_s^2 = 1/3$ (radiation) they stop growing, ending inflation. The final power spectrum is the convolution $$P_\varphi(k) = \frac{1}{64(2\pi)^3 $k^{4}$} \int $d^{3}$k_1\, $d^{3}$k_2\, \$delta^{{(3)}}$[\mathbf{k} - (\mathbf{k}_1+\mathbf{k}_2)]\, K_h(\mathbf{k}_1,\mathbf{k}_2)\, P_h(k_1)P_h(k_2),$$ where $P_h(k) = 2\pi^2 \Delta_h^2(k)/k^3$ and $\Delta_h^2 = (16/\pi)(H_{\rm inf}/m_{\rm pl})^2$. The kernel $K_h$ differs from the corresponding single-clock inflation expression, which is what gives the scenario a distinct squeezed-bispectrum signature.

What would settle it

Evaluate the integral in Eq. (22) numerically, including the growth factor $(c_s k |\eta|)^{3(c_s^2 - w)}$, and compare the amplitude and tilt of the resulting curvature power spectrum with the observed $A_s \simeq 2 \times 10^{-9}$ and $n_s \simeq 0.965$; if no physically derived graviton-fluid equation of state yields both, the scenario is falsified. A more direct check is to derive $w$ and $c_s$ for a graviton gas: if $w \le c_s^2$, scalar modes do not grow and the central claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that scalar curvature perturbations can be produced in pure de Sitter space without a scalar field. The mechanism is second-order back-reaction: gravitational-wave vacuum fluctuations $\chi^1_{ij}$ combine in pairs to source scalar potentials $\varphi_2$ and the curvature perturbation $\zeta_2$. On superhorizon scales, with $\varphi_2$ constant and $\psi_2 = 0$, the scalar power spectrum $P_\varphi(k)$ is given by a convolution of two tensor power spectra $P_h(k_1)P_h(k_2)$ through a kernel $K_h(\mathbf{k}_1,\mathbf{k}_2)$. Inserting the de Sitter tensor spectrum $\Delta_h^2 = (16/\pi)(H_{\rm inf}/m_{\rm pl})^2$, the authors find no uncompensated powers of $k$ in the scaling, so the spectrum is nearly scale invariant; if the graviton fluid satisfies $w - c_s^2 > 0$, the scalar modes grow on superhorizon scales, dominate over tensors, and can account for the observed $10^{-5}$ amplitude.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the gravitational-wave fluid filling the de Sitter phase has a sound speed whose square is smaller than its pressure-to-density ratio ($w > c_s^2$), so second-order scalar perturbations grow on superhorizon scales; without this growth the scalar amplitude would sit at $(H_{\rm inf}/m_{\rm pl})^4$, far below the observed level.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • No inflaton field or potential is needed; the near scale-invariant scalar spectrum follows from de Sitter tensor vacuum fluctuations alone.
  • The scenario predicts distinctive non-Gaussian features, because $K_h$ differs from the standard single-field inflation kernel, and those features can be searched for in the squeezed limit of large-scale structure.
  • Inflation has a natural exit: the instability of de Sitter space drives a transition to a radiation-dominated era, replacing a separate reheating mechanism.
  • The same second-order process also generates vector perturbations, giving additional observational signatures.
  • The observed amplitude of curvature perturbations becomes understandable if the graviton-fluid enhancement ($w - c_s^2 > 0$) operates during the de Sitter phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension would be to evaluate Eq. (22) numerically including the growth factor and compute the spectral tilt $n_s$; the paper infers near scale-invariance only by dimensional counting, so the exact $n_s$ would sharpen the comparison with cosmic microwave background data.
  • The scenario's viability hinges on the graviton fluid actually satisfying $w - c_s^2 > 0$; a derivation of $w$ and $c_s$ from graviton self-interactions would close the main gap and is not supplied here.
  • One could also look for the same tensor-induced scalar kernel in late-universe processes, where gravitational-wave backgrounds generate second-order scalar modes, providing an independent test of the kernel's shape.
  • If the scenario is right, the scalar and tensor tilts are tied through the graviton-fluid sound speed, a relation that could be probed once tensor modes are detected.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that primordial scalar perturbations can be generated in pure de Sitter space as second-order effects of tensor metric fluctuations, without an inflaton field. The authors derive equations for the second-order scalar potentials φ2 and ψ2 (Eqs. (9)–(11)) and the curvature perturbation ζ2 (Eq. (20)). They then compute the scalar power spectrum from the convolution of two tensor spectra (Eq. (22)) with the dS tensor amplitude (Eq. (24)), and claim the result is nearly scale invariant. They further argue that a graviton fluid with w − c_s^2 > 0 causes the second-order scalar modes to grow on superhorizon scales and dominate over tensor modes, and that dS instability provides a natural exit to radiation domination.

Significance. If the central claim held, the scenario would be an interesting model-independent alternative to inflaton-driven inflation, with a concrete prediction for the shape of the scalar spectrum and a distinctive bispectrum signature. The paper has the virtue of making an explicit, non-parametric (modulo w, c_s, and H_inf) second-order calculation and not fitting any amplitude to data. However, the computation as presented is incomplete in several load-bearing respects: the power-spectrum integral is not evaluated, the branch used for the spectrum (ψ2=0) is not the branch in which the scalar modes are amplified, and the amplification condition that makes scalars dominate tensors implies a large red tilt that appears inconsistent with Planck if the amplitude is also matched. These issues currently prevent the claims from being accepted as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [III, Eqs. (22)–(24)] The near-scale-invariance of the scalar power spectrum is not demonstrated. Eq. (22) defines P_φ(k) as a convolution of tensor spectra with the kernel Eq. (23), but the integral is never evaluated or regularized. With P_h(k) ∝ 1/k^3 and K_h of momentum dimension k^4, the integrand scales as d^3k_1 d^3k_2 δ(k−k_1−k_2) K_h/(k_1^3 k_2^3), which gives logarithmic UV and IR divergences; the claim that no uncompensated powers of k remain is a dimensional-analysis argument, not a computation. The authors should specify a regulator (e.g., a physical cutoff at the dS scale and at horizon entry) and show that the residual k-dependence is indeed as small as claimed.
  2. [II–III, Eqs. (17)–(22)] The computed power spectrum in Eq. (22) uses the ψ2=0 branch (Eq. (17)), in which ζ2 = −φ2 and there is no superhorizon growth. The amplification mechanism described after Eq. (20), namely w − c_s^2 > 0, acts through Eq. (20) only when ψ2 is nonzero. Consequently, the near-scale-invariant spectrum of Eq. (22) is not the spectrum of the amplified scalar perturbations that the paper argues dominate over tensors. The relation between the amplified branch and the spectrum used for the prediction is missing and should be made explicit.
  3. [II, Eq. (20); IV] There is an internal tension between the amplification needed for a 10^-5 curvature perturbation and the claimed near-scale-invariance. If one inserts the growing factor from Eq. (20), the power spectrum acquires a factor ∝ (c_s k|η|)^{-6(w−c_s^2)} evaluated at the end of inflation, i.e., ∝ exp[6(w−c_s^2)N(k)], giving n_s − 1 = −6(w−c_s^2). Matching Δ_ζ^2 ≈ 2×10^-9 with the naive second-order amplitude ∼(16/π)^2(H/m_pl)^4 and the tensor bound H/m_pl ≲ 10^-5 requires w−c_s^2 ≈ 0.07–0.14 for N ≈ 50–60, which predicts n_s − 1 ≈ −0.4 to −0.8, far from the Planck value. Thus the amplification and near-scale-invariance cannot both follow from Eq. (20) as stated; the authors need to either derive a stronger amplification mechanism or demonstrate that the growing branch with a consistent w−c_s^2 still yields an acceptable tilt.
  4. [II, after Eq. (20)] The values of w and c_s for the graviton fluid are never derived; the condition w − c_s^2 > 0 is asserted with a citation to [29]. Since both the growth of scalar perturbations and the tilt of the final spectrum depend on these quantities, the manuscript should provide at least a derivation or a physically motivated estimate of w and c_s, rather than leaving them as free parameters that determine the main prediction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title/Abstract] The text has numerous OCR artifacts and typos (e.g., 'effects', 'fluctuations', 'scenario' in the abstract and throughout), which should be cleaned before publication.
  2. [II, Eq. (9)] The derivation of Eq. (9) is not given; since this is the central second-order equation, the authors should state where it is derived or include the key steps in an appendix.
  3. [III, after Eq. (23)] The statement that no uncompensated powers of k appear is insufficient; the integration measure and the delta function can introduce k-dependence, so the argument should be made quantitative.
  4. [IV, Discussion] The mechanism for ending inflation via the dS instability is only sketched; a quantitative transition to radiation domination is not shown.
  5. [References] Reference [11] appears with a duplicated label in the bibliography; please remove the extra '[11]'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scalar spectrum is a direct convolution of the standard de Sitter tensor spectrum, not a fit or a self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central result, Eqs. (22)-(24), is an honest convolution of the standard de Sitter tensor power spectrum Delta_h^2 = (16/pi)(H_inf/m_pl)^2 (Eq. 24, from Watanabe and Komatsu [30]) through a second-order kernel K_h. The near scale-invariance of P_phi(k) follows mathematically from the scale-invariance of the input Delta_h^2; this is a genuine consequence of the assumed dS tensor spectrum, not a parameter fitted to the observed scalar spectrum. The tensor input is an independently established standard result, not defined in terms of the target P_phi. No amplitude is tuned: the paper explicitly leaves the 10^-5 level to 'potential physical mechanisms that enhance scalar perturbations' rather than claiming to predict it from the computed formula. The condition w - c_s^2 > 0 after Eq. (20) is an external assumption imported from [29] (not by the present authors); it is load-bearing and is in tension with the psi_2 = 0 branch used for Eq. (22), but it is an equation-of-state assumption about a graviton fluid, not a circular redefinition of the predicted spectrum. The self-citations ([11,12,18,19,20] and related) are contextual references to earlier work on second-order tensor-induced perturbations and observational constraints; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem and do not force the present result by authority. There is no quoted Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no author-imported uniqueness claim. The paper's possible shortcomings are internal consistency and under-support of the enhancement condition, which are correctness risks rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation's observable predictions depend on four parameter or initial-condition choices (H_inf, w, c_s^2, Pi_2in), none of which is fixed by first principles in this letter. The near-scale-invariance of the psi_2=0 branch is robust, but the amplitude, the tilt, and the scalar-over-tensor enhancement all require additional assumptions that are cited rather than derived.

free parameters (4)
  • H_inf (or Lambda) = not specified; bounded by tensor-mode constraints, roughly r < 0.03
    Hubble scale during dS enters Delta_h^2 in Eq. (24) and sets the overall amplitude of the tensor and scalar spectra; it is not fixed by the paper's own principles.
  • w
    Equation of state of the graviton fluid; assumed to satisfy w - c_s^2 > 0 after Eq. (20), with no value or derivation given.
  • c_s^2
    Effective sound speed squared of the graviton fluid; appears in the growth factor of Eq. (20) and in the tilt of the late-time spectrum, but is never computed.
  • initial anisotropic stress Pi_2in = set to satisfy Eq. (17)
    Initial condition chosen so that psi_2 = 0 in the worked example of Section III; this is a manual choice that selects the branch used for the power spectrum.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Einstein gravity with a bare cosmological constant Lambda supports the pure dS background.
    Section II sets the metric and alpha = (3/Lambda)^(1/2); no microphysical origin for Lambda is given.
  • domain assumption The GW backreaction can be described as a fluid with the four-velocity of Eq. (2) and the anisotropic stress decomposition of Eqs. (7)-(8).
    Equations (1)-(8) define the effective stress-energy of the graviton gas; this is standard but assumes a particular quantum state.
  • standard math The tensor vacuum power spectrum in dS is the scale-invariant Delta_h^2 of Eq. (24).
    Citation [30] is used; treated as an external input.
  • ad hoc to paper The particular solution psi_2 = 0 and phi_2 = F_chi/4 is the one relevant for the scalar spectrum.
    Section III says 'let us consider the case where psi_2 = 0' and then computes P_phi from it, discarding the second term of Eq. (12).
  • ad hoc to paper The graviton-fluid equation of state satisfies w - c_s^2 > 0.
    Section II after Eq. (20) asserts this condition, citing [29], with no derivation of w and c_s.
  • domain assumption De Sitter space is unstable and decays to a radiation-dominated phase.
    Sections I and IV invoke references [21-28]; no decay rate or reheating calculation is provided.
  • domain assumption The scalar perturbations produced by this mechanism are adiabatic.
    Section IV says: 'Assuming these fluctuations are adiabatic, as in the standard picture of inflation...'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inflation without an Inflaton." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JLWMHXGV

@misc{pith2026241214265,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inflation without an Inflaton},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JLWMHXGV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14265}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a novel scenario in which scalar perturbations, that seed the large scale structure of the Universe, are generated without relying on a scalar field (the inflaton). In this framework, inflation is driven by a de Sitter space-time (dS), where tensor metric fluctuations (i.e., gravitational waves) naturally arise from quantum vacuum oscillations, and scalar fluctuations are generated via second-order tensor effects. We compute the power spectrum of such scalar fluctuations and show it to be consistent with near scale-invariance. We derive the necessary conditions under which scalar perturbations become significant and much larger than the tensor modes, and we identify a natural mechanism to end inflation via a transition to a radiation-dominated phase. Our proposed mechanism could remove the need for a model-dependent scenario: the choice of a scalar field, as the inflaton, to drive inflation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Intrinsic Torsion, Extrinsic Torsion, and the Hubble Parameter

    gr-qc 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The second fundamental form of a spatial slice in a torsional spacetime is a sum of the Hubble term and an extrinsic torsion term, producing a negative bias in Hubble estimates when torsion is neglected.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [29]

    Negro and S

    A. Negro and S. P. Patil, [ arXiv:2403.16806 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Spectrum of relict gravitational ra- diation and the early state of the universe,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Spectrum of relict gravitational ra- diation and the early state of the universe,” JETP Lett. 30, 682-685 (1979)

    work page 1979

  3. [2]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. 91B (1980) 99 [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 130]. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x 1980

  4. [3]

    Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,” Phys. Lett. B 117, 175-178 (1982) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-X

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-x 1982

  5. [4]

    Quantum Fluc- tuations and a Nonsingular Universe,

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluc- tuations and a Nonsingular Universe,” JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33 (1981) 549]

    work page 1981

  6. [5]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solu- tion to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solu- tion to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347 [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 139]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 1981

  7. [7]

    Chaotic Inflation,

    A. D. Linde, “Chaotic Inflation,” Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983), 177-181 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 1983

  8. [8]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Sym- metry Breaking,

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Sym- metry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982), 1220-1223 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1220 1982

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Infla- tionary Universe Generated by the Combined Action of a Scalar Field and Gravitational Vacuum Polarization,

    L. A. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Infla- tionary Universe Generated by the Combined Action of a Scalar Field and Gravitational Vacuum Polarization,” Phys. Lett. B 157 (1985), 361-367 doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(85)90381-8

    1985 doi

  2. [10]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], “Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020), A1 doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201833880 [ arXiv:1807.06205 [astro-ph.CO]]. [11]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Updated con- straints on amplitude and tilt of the tensor primor- dial spectrum,

    G. Galloni, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Migliac- cio, A. Ricciardone and N. Vittorio, “Updated con- straints on amplitude and tilt of the tensor primor- dial spectrum,” JCAP 04 (2023), 062 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2023/04/062 [ arXiv:2208.00188 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Breaking the Single Clock Symmetry: measuring single- field inflation non-Gaussian features,

    D. Bertacca, R. Jimenez, S. Matarrese and L. Verde, “Breaking the Single Clock Symmetry: measuring single- field inflation non-Gaussian features,” [ arXiv:2110.09549 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Cosmology from Quantum Information,

    C. Gomez and R. Jimenez, “Cosmology from Quantum Information,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) no.6, 063511 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063511 [ arXiv:2002.04294 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Model Independent Pre- diction of the Spectral Index of Primordial Quantum Fluctuations,

    C. G´ omez and R. Jimenez, “Model Independent Pre- diction of the Spectral Index of Primordial Quantum Fluctuations,” JCAP 10, 052 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2021/10/052 [ arXiv:2103.10144 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Quantum Fisher Cosmol- ogy: Confronting Observations and the Trans-Planckian Problem,

    C. Gomez and R. Jimenez, “Quantum Fisher Cosmol- ogy: Confronting Observations and the Trans-Planckian Problem,” JCAP 09 016 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2021/09/016 [ arXiv:2105.05251 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    1972, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 47,

    Tomita, K. 1972, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 47,

    1972

  9. [17]

    1971, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 45,

    Tomita, K. 1971, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 45,

    1971

  10. [18]

    Center of Excellence Maria de Maeztu 2020-2023

    and ¯ρ(η) = ¯ρin ( η ηin )3(1+w) = ¯ρin (csk|η|)3(1+w) in Eq. ( 19), in Fourier space, it becomes ˜ζ2 − ˜φ 2 = − H 2 Λ 4πG(1 +w)¯ρ ˜ψ 2 = − H 2 Λ 4πG(1 +w)¯ρin × [ − 8πG H 2 Λ c2 sk2 ˜Π 2in + ( ˜φ 2 − 1 4 ˜Fχ )] (csk|η|)3(c2 s−w) . (20) Now we need to know the value of cs and ...

    2020

  11. [19]

    P. Bari, A. Ricciardone, N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) no.9, 091301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.091301 [ arXiv:2111.06884 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    P. Bari, D. Bertacca, N. Bartolo, A. Ricciardone, S. Giardiello and S. Matarrese, JCAP 07 (2023), 034 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/034 [ arXiv:2209.05329 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Matarrese, S

    S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach and M. Bruni, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), 043504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.043504 [ arXiv:astro-ph/9707278 [astro-ph]]

    1998 arXiv

  14. [22]

    O., & Mottola, E

    Antoniadis, I., Mazur, P. O., & Mottola, E. 2007, New Journal of Physics, 9, 11. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/1/011

    2007 doi

  15. [23]

    A. m. Polyakov, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25, 187 (1982)

    1982

  16. [24]

    Mottola, Phys

    E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. D 31, 754 (1985)

    1985

  17. [25]

    Mottola, Phys

    E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. D 33, 2136 (1986) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.33.2136

    1986 doi

  18. [26]

    Mottola, Phys

    E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. D 33, 1616-1621 (1986)

    1986

  19. [27]

    Dvali, C

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and S. Zell, JCAP 06, 028 (2017) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/028 [ arXiv:1701.08776 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Alicki, G

    R. Alicki, G. Barenboim and A. Jenkins, [ arXiv:2307.04803 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  21. [30]

    Alicki, G

    R. Alicki, G. Barenboim and A. Jenkins, Phys. Rev. D 108, no.12, 123530 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123530 [ arXiv:2307.04800 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [33]

    Watanabe and E

    Y. Watanabe and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D 73, 123515 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.123515 [ arXiv:astro-ph/0604176 [astro-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  23. [416]

    doi:10.1143/PTP.47.416

    doi

  24. [1747]

    doi:10.1143/PTP.45.1747

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.