Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Generation of the Complete Bell Basis via Hong-Ou-Mandel Interference

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of vector modes can generate all four polarization Bell states, with the local Bell-state content set by the photons' transverse positions.

desk verdict A solid, novel structured-photon experiment with a clean theoretical core, but the headline 'unique Bell-state regions' are not quantitatively supported because the derivation drops radial mode factors without justification. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14274 v1 pith:5SQS746K submitted 2024-12-18 quant-ph

Xiaoqin Gao , Dilip Paneru , Francesco Di Colandrea , Yingwen Zhang , Ebrahim Karimi This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.67.Mn42.50.Ex42.50.-p
keywords Hong-Ou-MandelinterferenceBellstatesvectormodesq-platesstructuredphotonsspace-resolvedquantumstatetomographyspontaneousparametricdown-conversionpolarizationentanglement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect—usually taken to produce only the antisymmetric Bell state $|\psi^-\rangle$ when two photons are post-selected to exit different ports—can instead produce all four polarization Bell states at once when the inputs are vector modes, beams whose polarization varies across their transverse profile. The claim is that the Bell-state content of the coincidence output is not a single global state but is distributed in space: at different pairs of azimuthal positions $(\theta_c,\theta_d)$ in the two output ports, different Bell states are generated, and on specific arcs exactly one Bell state survives. If true, a single beamsplitter with two q-plates (waveplates that imprint azimuthally varying polarization) becomes a spatial multiplexer of the complete Bell basis, addressable simply by where the two photons are detected. The paper supports this with a full four-dimensional, space-resolved polarization tomography of the two-photon output that matches the theoretical state of Eq. (4) across all sixteen measurement projections.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vector mode produced by a $\pi$-tuned q-plate: a photon whose polarization state rotates with azimuthal angle, $|H\rangle \to \cos(2q\theta)|H\rangle + \sin(2q\theta)|V\rangle$. The 50:50 beamsplitter sends each input mode to both outputs with opposite signs, and post-selecting on coincidence events (one photon in each output port) removes the bunching terms, leaving exactly the four Bell-state amplitudes of Eq. (4). The trigonometric sum-to-product identities of Eq. (S7) are what convert the raw products of angle-dependent polarizations into the compact coefficients of Eqs. (5)--(8); the same identities yield Eq. (10), which locates the single-Bell-state regions. The mechanism is azimuthal phase structure rather than any specific radial profile, so the authors argue the scheme extends to arbitrary spatial patterns.

What would settle it

Use q-plate charges $q_a=1$, $q_b=1/2$ with deliberately unequal radial beam waists in the two input arms, and tomographically reconstruct the density matrix at pixels along $\theta_c=\theta_d$; if the expected single-$\psi^-$ region shows appreciable $\phi^+$, $\phi^-$, or $\psi^+$ probability, the radial-cancellation step behind Eq. (10) has failed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, for two horizontally polarized Gaussian photons converted by q-plates of topological charge $q_a$ and $q_b$ and then interfered on a 50:50 beamsplitter, the coincidence-post-selected output is $|\psi_f\rangle = N(s_{\phi^+}|\phi^+\rangle + s_{\phi^-}|\phi^-\rangle + s_{\psi^+}|\psi^+\rangle + s_{\psi^-}|\psi^-\rangle)$, with the four coefficients given by Eqs. (5)--(8). Those coefficients are products of radial mode amplitudes and sines or cosines of combinations of $2q_a\theta_c$ and $2q_b\theta_d$, so the Bell-state population oscillates with the transverse positions of the two detected photons. The paper further claims that the conditions in Eq. (10) identify arcs on which only one Bell state has nonzero probability; for $q_a=1$, $q_b=1/2$, the $\psi^+$ and $\psi^-$ states are isolated on $\theta_c=-\theta_d$ and $\theta_c=\theta_d$, and the smallest charge pair isolating all four states is $q_a=\pm 3/2$, $q_b=\mp 1/2$. The full position-resolved density matrix, reconstructed from event-camera correlations, agrees with this decomposition.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction that certain output locations contain exactly one Bell state assumes that the radial intensity profiles of the two input modes cancel after averaging over radius; if the radial shapes of the two beams differ, those locations may instead contain mixtures of the other Bell states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single pair of q-plates and one beamsplitter can act as a space-multiplexed Bell-state source: detecting the photons' transverse positions selects which of the four Bell states is delivered.
  • The spatial Bell-state map is programmable through the choice of $q_a$, $q_b$, and input polarization, and Eqs. (10)--(11) give explicit recipes for isolating each member of the Bell basis.
  • Space-resolved coincidence measurements recover the complete four-dimensional output state, going beyond earlier structured-HOM studies that mapped only one output port with a bucket detector on the other.
  • Because the effect relies on azimuthal polarization structure, it generalizes to other structured-light elements such as g-plates, which could map the four Bell states onto a two-dimensional Cartesian grid.
  • The same vector-mode interference mechanism is a route toward multi-photon extensions, in which spatially structured pairwise interference would generate position-dependent entangled states of more than two photons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the radial-cancellation assumption holds, the two-photon position becomes a which-Bell-state label, so the Bell-state index plus the spatial index together form a larger encoding space that could be exploited for high-dimensional quantum communication.
  • Swapping q-plates for programmable spatial light modulators would, in principle, allow the Bell-state map to be reconfigured in real time, turning one fixed interferometer into a reconfigurable Bell-state router.
  • Real detectors integrate over finite pixel areas, so the predicted zero-probability lines for the other three Bell states will appear as finite-width purity dips; the paper does not quantify how pixel size and mode overlap degrade the isolated-Bell-state regions.
  • A direct stress test is to vary the radial mode content of the two inputs (e.g., different Laguerre-Gauss radial indices or unequal beam waists) and check whether the single-Bell-state arcs drift, broaden, or acquire admixtures, which would reveal the limits of Eq. (10).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and theoretical study of Hong-Ou-Mandel interference between two vector modes generated by q-plates. The authors derive a two-photon coincidence state, Eq. (4), whose polarization part is a superposition of the four Bell states with coefficients that depend on the transverse positions of the two detected photons (Eqs. (5)-(8)). They further state conditions, Eq. (10), under which only one Bell state is present in a given spatial region, and they present space-resolved 16-projection polarization tomography of the output for qa=1, qb=1/2 using event cameras (Figs. 2 and 3), with additional configurations in the Supplementary Material. The central qualitative claim is that, contrary to the usual HOM coincidence result, all four Bell states can be generated simultaneously, with their local distribution controlled by the input vector modes.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is significant: it provides a scalable-looking way to create spatially structured Bell-state distributions from HOM interference, which is of interest for high-dimensional quantum communication and structured quantum light. The derivation of Eqs. (4)-(8) is transparent and internally consistent within the stated model, and the qualitative agreement between the measured 16-projection maps and theory is encouraging. However, the headline 'only one Bell state' regions are not yet supported by a valid derivation, and the experimental validation lacks quantitative figures of merit. These issues are fixable but require substantive revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplementary Material S2, Eqs. (S6)-(S8); main text Eqs. (5)-(8), (10)] The statement that 'Summing out the radial dependence, Eq. (S6) can be rewritten' as Eq. (S7) is not a valid algebraic step. Equations (S6) contain the radial products F_qa(r_d)F_qb(r_c) and F_qa(r_c)F_qb(r_d), which are not equal for Laguerre-Gauss modes with qa≠qb. Equation (S7), and therefore the uniqueness conditions in Eq. (10), are obtained only if these products are assumed equal at all detected point pairs (or if the radial amplitudes are effectively constant over the detection area), an assumption that is neither derived nor quantitatively tested. To make the problem concrete, for qa=1 and qb=1/2 at θc=θd=θ, Eq. (5) gives s_phi+ = [F_qa(r_d)F_qb(r_c) - F_qa(r_c)F_qb(r_d)] cos(θ), so the diagonal θc=θd, which Eq. (10) predicts to contain only P_psi-, also contains a P_phi+ contribution whenever the two radial products differ. Because the uniqueness regions are a headline result, the authors should either derive the radially marginalized coefficients explicitly, including the detector pixel response, or provide a numerical test with the actual LG_{0,2q} radial profiles showing that the predicted 'only one Bell state' regions survive radial marginalization.
  2. [Main text, Figs. 2-3 and Eq. (9)] The experimental validation is presented only through visual comparison of normalized coincidence maps. No error bars, per-pixel or binned state fidelities F_Bell = <Bell|rho|Bell>, purities, or entanglement witnesses are reported for the reconstructed density matrices, and no quantitative agreement metric (e.g., chi^2 or fidelity between measured and theoretical maps) is given. Since the central claim is the simultaneous generation of all four Bell states in tailored spatial regions, quantitative figures of merit are needed, at least for the main qa=1, qb=1/2 case. The 99% purity quoted for the separate |psi-> calibration in Fig. S1(c) does not substitute for this, because the main result concerns the admixture of all four states.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text Eq. (2) vs. Supplementary Eq. (S1)] Eq. (2) and Eq. (S1) appear to adopt different phase conventions for the |V> component of U|H>; please specify the relative phase convention between the H/V and L/R bases so the two expressions are consistent.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains the ungrammatical phrase 'q1=1 is on and q2 are on' and mixes Q1/Q2 with qa/qb notation; please harmonize the labels and language.
  3. [Main text near Fig. 2] The theoretical curves are said to be calculated from Eq. (4), but the plotted quantity is a marginal distribution over radial coordinates; please state explicitly whether the radial factors in Eqs. (5)-(8) are included in the simulation or whether the simplified Eq. (S7) is used.
  4. [References] References [36] and [38] are the same paper (Karimi et al., Opt. Lett. 34, 1225 (2009)); please consolidate them.
  5. [Abstract and main text] The claim of a 'complete four-dimensional state structure' is stronger than what is presented, since the reported Bell-state maps are azimuthal marginals after summing over radial pixels; please qualify the claim or show that the radial dependence is genuinely negligible with a quantitative measure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted Bell-state structure follows from standard q-plate and beamsplitter transformations, and the experimental tomography is an independent 16-projection measurement.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The input state Eq. (1) is transformed by the q-plate action Eq. (2), which is cited to standard optics literature, and by the beamsplitter transformation Eq. (3). The coincidence post-selection yields the Bell-state amplitudes Eqs. (5)-(8), and the supplementary derivation (S1)-(S6) reproduces these amplitudes by direct algebra with no fitted parameters. The experimental Bell-state maps are obtained from 16 independent polarization projections and maximum-likelihood tomography, not from the theoretical model, so the agreement shown in Figs. 2 and 3 is an independent test rather than a fitted prediction. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [2], [34]) are contextual and are not load-bearing for the central claim. The radial marginalization step leading to Eq. (S7) assumes that the radial-mode products F_qa(rd)F_qb(rc) and F_qa(rc)F_qb(rd) have equal marginalized contributions; this is an unverified modeling simplification that could affect the sharpness of the 'only one Bell state' regions, but it is not an equivalence between input and output by construction, nor a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Thus there is no circular step in the paper's argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claim rests on standard q-plate and beamsplitter transformations plus an unquantified radial-factorization assumption in the derivation of the Bell-state location conditions. The topological charges qa and qb are chosen experimental parameters rather than fitted values.

free parameters (1)
  • q-plate topological charges qa, qb = qa=1, qb=1/2 for the main demonstration; other values in supplementary figures
    The spatial Bell-state pattern and the conditions in Eq. (11) depend directly on qa and qb. They are chosen experimental settings, not fitted to the data, but the central claim's spatial structure is a function of these values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption q-plate action in Eq. (2) with δ=π converts an input Gaussian polarization state into a vector mode with azimuthal phase 2qθ.
    Taken from prior q-plate literature (Refs. 36,37); the entire predicted Bell-state spatial pattern follows from this transformation.
  • standard math The 50:50 beamsplitter acts independently on all degrees of freedom as in Eq. (3).
    Standard linear-optics unitary used throughout the derivation in Supplementary S2.
  • domain assumption Post-selecting coincidence events between output ports c and d selects terms with one photon in each output port.
    Used to obtain Eq. (4) from the full beamsplitter output; the claim concerns the coincidence-conditioned state.
  • ad hoc to paper Radial mode functions F_qa and F_qb factor out of the azimuthal conditions after marginalizing over the radial coordinate.
    Eq. (S7) and the 'only Bell state' conditions in Eq. (10) require F_qa(rd)F_qb(rc) = F_qa(rc)F_qb(rd) or an equivalent cancellation; the text justifies this only by noting minimal radial variation, not by calculation.
  • domain assumption SPDC source with single-mode fiber filtering produces a two-photon Gaussian input in the two interferometer arms.
    The experiment relies on this to define the input state |ψ0> in Eq. (1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generation of the Complete Bell Basis via Hong-Ou-Mandel Interference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5SQS746K

@misc{pith2026241214274,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generation of the Complete Bell Basis via Hong-Ou-Mandel Interference},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5SQS746K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14274}
}
read the original abstract

Optical vector modes (VMs), characterized by spatially varying polarization distributions, have become essential tools across microscopy, metrology, optical trapping, nanophotonics, and optical communications. The Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect, a fundamental two-photon interference phenomenon in quantum optics, offers significant potential to extend the applications of VMs beyond the classical regime. Here, we demonstrate the simultaneous generation of all four Bell states by exploiting the HOM interference of VMs. The resulting Bell states exhibit spatially tailored distributions that are determined by the input modes. These results represent a significant step in manipulating HOM interference within structured photons, offering promising avenues for high-dimensional quantum information processing and in particular high-dimensional quantum communication, quantum sensing, and advanced photonic technologies reliant on tailored quantum states of light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14274 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tutorial: Hong-Ou-Mandel interference with Structured Photons

    quant-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper provides a systematic theoretical treatment of HOM interference for structured photons, deriving a general coincidence-rate formula and a closed-form LG mode overlap integral.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987)

    1987

  2. [2]

    Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Alicia Sit, Yingwen Zhang, Robert Fickler, Filippo M Miatto, Yuan Yao, Fabio Sciar- rino, and Ebrahim Karimi, Two-photon interference: the hong–ou–mandel effect, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 012402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Pieter Kok, W. J. Munro, Kae Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, Jonathan P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Publisher’s note: Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 797 (2007). 5

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Nasr, Bahaa E

    Magued B. Nasr, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Alexander V. Sergienko, and Malvin C. Teich, Demonstration of dispersion-canceled quantum-optical coherence tomogra- phy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 083601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Shah, Ashley Lyons, Niclas Westerberg, Erik M

    Bienvenu Ndagano, Hugo Defienne, Dominic Branford, Yash D. Shah, Ashley Lyons, Niclas Westerberg, Erik M. Gauger, and Daniele Faccio, Quantum microscopy based on hong–ou–mandel interference, Nat. Photonics 16, 384 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Xiao-Min Hu, Yu Guo, Bi-Heng Liu, Chuan-Feng Li, and Guang-Can Guo, Progress in quantum teleportation, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 339 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    William T. M. Irvine, Ant ´ ıa Lamas Linares, Michiel J. A. de Dood, and Dirk Bouwmeester, Optimal quantum cloning on a beam splitter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 047902 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Pho- tonics 3, 720–723 (2009)

    Eleonora Nagali, Linda Sansoni, Fabio Sciarrino, Francesco De Martini, Lorenzo Marrucci, Bruno Piccir- illo, Ebrahim Karimi, and Enrico Santamato, Optimal quantum cloning of orbital angular momentum photon qubits through hong–ou–mandel coalescence, Nat. Pho- tonics 3, 720–723 (2009)

    work page 2009

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Robert Fickler, Robert W Boyd, and Ebrahim Karimi, High-dimensional quantum cloning and applications to quantum hacking, Sci. Adv. 3, e1601915 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Bra´ nczyk,Design considerations for high-purity heralded single-photon sources, Phys

    Francesco Graffitti, J´ er´ emy Kelly-Massicotte, Alessandro Fedrizzi, and Agata M. Bra´ nczyk,Design considerations for high-purity heralded single-photon sources, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053811 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Cr´ epeau, Richard Jozsa, Asher Peres, and William K

    Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Cr´ epeau, Richard Jozsa, Asher Peres, and William K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    Han-Sen Zhong, Hui Wang, Yu-Hao Deng, Ming-Cheng Chen, Li-Chao Peng, Yi-Han Luo, Jian Qin, Dian Wu, Xing Ding, Yi Hu, et al., Quantum computational advan- tage using photons, Science 370, 1460 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Renema, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan, Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light, Phys

    Han-Sen Zhong, Yu-Hao Deng, Jian Qin, Hui Wang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Li-Chao Peng, Yi-Han Luo, Dian Wu, Si-Qiu Gong, Hao Su, Yi Hu, Peng Hu, Xiao-Yan Yang, Wei-Jun Zhang, Hao Li, Yuxuan Li, Xiao Jiang, Lin Gan, Guangwen Yang, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Li Li, Nai-Le Liu, Jelmer J. Ren...

    2021

  6. [14]

    Qiwen Zhan, Cylindrical vector beams: from mathemat- ical concepts to applications, Adv. Opt. Photonics 1, 1 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Bouhelier, M

    A. Bouhelier, M. Beversluis, A. Hartschuh, and L. Novotny, Near-field second-harmonic generation in- duced by local field enhancement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 013903 (2003)

    2003

  8. [16]

    Express 15, 4106 (2007)

    Weibin Chen and Qiwen Zhan, Numerical study of an apertureless near field scanning optical microscope probe under radial polarization illumination, Opt. Express 15, 4106 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    Express 18, 10828 (2010)

    Yuichi Kozawa and Shunichi Sato, Optical trapping of micrometer-sized dielectric particles by cylindrical vector beams, Opt. Express 18, 10828 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Moradi, V

    H. Moradi, V. Shahabadi, E. Madadi, E. Karimi, and F. Hajizadeh, Efficient optical trapping with cylindrical vector beams, Opt. Express 27, 7266 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    R. Dorn, S. Quabis, and G. Leuchs, Sharper focus for a radially polarized light beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 233901 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    Photonics 2, 501 (2008)

    Haifeng Wang, Luping Shi, Boris Lukyanchuk, Colin Sheppard, and Chong Tow Chong, Creation of a needle of longitudinally polarized light in vacuum using binary optics, Nat. Photonics 2, 501 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    CER Souza, CVS Borges, AZ Khoury, JAO Huguenin, L Aolita, and SP Walborn, Quantum key distribu- tion without a shared reference frame, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032345 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Giuseppe Vallone, Vincenzo D’Ambrosio, Anna Spon- selli, Sergei Slussarenko, Lorenzo Marrucci, Fabio Sciar- rino, and Paolo Villoresi, Free-space quantum key distri- bution by rotation-invariant twisted photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 060503 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Kyosuke Sakai and S Noda, Optical trapping of metal particles in doughnut-shaped beam emitted by photonic- crystal laser, Electron. Lett. 43, 1 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    Eiji Miyai, Kyosuke Sakai, Takayuki Okano, Wataru Ku- nishi, Dai Ohnishi, and Susumu Noda, Lasers producing tailored beams, Nature 441, 946 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Express 19, 11963 (2011)

    Seita Iwahashi, Yoshitaka Kurosaka, Kyosuke Sakai, Kyoko Kitamura, Naoki Takayama, and Susumu Noda, Higher-order vector beams produced by photonic-crystal lasers, Opt. Express 19, 11963 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Marrucci, C

    L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, Optical spin-to- orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 163905 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Filippo Cardano, Ebrahim Karimi, Sergei Slussarenko, Lorenzo Marrucci, Corrado de Lisio, and Enrico San- tamato, Polarization pattern of vector vortex beams gen- erated by q-plates with different topological charges, Appl. Opt. 51, C1 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Express 21, 8815 (2013)

    Filippo Cardano, Ebrahim Karimi, Lorenzo Marrucci, Corrado de Lisio, and Enrico Santamato, Generation and dynamics of optical beams with polarization singu- larities, Opt. Express 21, 8815 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Christian Maurer, Alexander Jesacher, Severin F¨ urhapter, Stefan Bernet, and Monika Ritsch-Marte, Tailoring of arbitrary optical vector beams, New J. Phys. 9, 78 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    Padgett, and Enrico Santamato, Spin-orbit hybrid entanglement of photons and quantum contextuality, Phys

    Ebrahim Karimi, Jonathan Leach, Sergei Slussarenko, Bruno Piccirillo, Lorenzo Marrucci, Lixiang Chen, Wei- long She, Sonja Franke-Arnold, Miles J. Padgett, and Enrico Santamato, Spin-orbit hybrid entanglement of photons and quantum contextuality, Phys. Rev. A 82, 022115 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Robert Fickler, Mario Krenn, Radek Lapkiewicz, Sven Ramelow, and Anton Zeilinger, Real-time imaging of quantum entanglement, Sci. Rep. 3, 1 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Vincenzo D’Ambrosio, Gonzalo Carvacho, Francesco Graffitti, Chiara Vitelli, Bruno Piccirillo, Lorenzo Mar- rucci, and Fabio Sciarrino, Entangled vector vortex beams, Phys. Rev. A 94, 030304 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Francesco Graffitti, Vincenzo D’Ambrosio, Massimiliano Proietti, Joseph Ho, Bruno Piccirillo, Corrado de Lisio, Lorenzo Marrucci, and Alessandro Fedrizzi, Hyperentan- glement in structured quantum light, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043350 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Xiaoqin Gao, Yingwen Zhang, Alessio D’Errico, Alicia Sit, Khabat Heshami, and Ebrahim Karimi, Full spatial characterization of entangled structured photons, Phys. 6 Rev. Lett. 132, 063802 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    , Engineering quantum states from a spatially structured quantum eraser, Sci

    Carlo Schiano, Bereneice Sephton, Roberto Aiello, Francesco Graffitti, Nijil Lal, Andrea Chiuri, Simone Santoro, Luigi Santamaria Amato, Lorenzo Marrucci, Corrado de Lisio, et al. , Engineering quantum states from a spatially structured quantum eraser, Sci. Adv. 10, eadm9278 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    Express 19, 4085 (2011)

    Sergei Slussarenko, Anatoli Murauski, Tao Du, Vladimir Chigrinov, Lorenzo Marrucci, and Enrico Santamato, Tunable liquid crystal q-plates with arbitrary topological charge, Opt. Express 19, 4085 (2011)

    2011

  29. [38]

    Ebrahim Karimi, Bruno Piccirillo, Lorenzo Marrucci, and Enrico Santamato, Light propagation in a birefrin- gent plate with topological charge, Opt. Lett. 34, 1225 (2009)

    2009

  30. [39]

    Bruno Piccirillo, Vincenzo D’Ambrosio, Sergei Slus- sarenko, Lorenzo Marrucci, and Enrico Santamato, Pho- ton spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion via an electrically tunable q-plate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 241104 (2010)

    2010

  31. [40]

    Andrei Nomerotski, Imaging and time stamping of pho- tons with nanosecond resolution in timepix based optical cameras, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 937, 26 (2019)

    2019

  32. [41]

    Nomerotski, M

    A. Nomerotski, M. Chekhlov, D. Dolzhenko, R. Glazen- borg, B. Farella, M. Keach, R. Mahon, D. Orlov, and P. Svihra, Intensified tpx3cam, a fast data-driven optical camera with nanosecond timing resolution for single pho- ton detection in quantum applications, J. Instrum. 18, C...

    2023

  33. [42]

    Daniel F. V. James, Paul G. Kwiat, William J. Munro, and Andrew G. White, Measurement of qubits, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001)

    2001

  34. [43]

    Hugo Larocque, J´ er´ emie Gagnon-Bischoff, Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Robert Fickler, Jeremy Upham, Robert W Boyd, and Ebrahim Karimi, Arbitrary optical wavefront shaping via spin-to-orbit coupling, J. Opt. 18, 124002 (2016)

    2016

  35. [44]

    Alessio D’Errico, Filippo Cardano, Maria Maffei, Alexan- dre Dauphin, Raouf Barboza, Chiara Esposito, Bruno Piccirillo, Maciej Lewenstein, Pietro Massignan, and Lorenzo Marrucci, Two-dimensional topological quantum walks in the momentum space of structured light, Optica 7, 108 (2020)

    2020

  36. [45]

    Han-Sen Zhong, Yuan Li, Wei Li, Li-Chao Peng, Zu-En Su, Yi Hu, Yu-Ming He, Xing Ding, Weijun Zhang, Hao Li, Lu Zhang, Zhen Wang, Lixing You, Xi-Lin Wang, Xiao Jiang, Li Li, Yu-Ao Chen, Nai-Le Liu, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan, 12-photon entanglement and scal- able scattersho...

    2018

  37. [46]

    Photonics 17, 324 (2023)

    Dan Cogan, Zu-En Su, Oded Kenneth, and David Ger- shoni, Deterministic generation of indistinguishable pho- tons in a cluster state, Nat. Photonics 17, 324 (2023)

    2023

  38. [47]

    James O’Sullivan, Kevin Reuer, Aleksandr Grigorev, Xi Dai, Alonso Hern´ andez-Ant´ on, Manuel H. Mu˜ noz- Arias, Christoph Hellings, Alexander Flasby, Dante Co- lao Zanuz, Jean-Claude Besse, Alexandre Blais, Daniel Malz, Christopher Eichler, and Andreas Wallraff, De- terminist...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.