Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum computing in spin-adapted representations for efficient simulations of spin systems

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that truncating intermediate total spins in a successive-coupling spin path produces a hierarchy of sparse, local qubit Hamiltonians whose ground states converge quickly to the exact Heisenberg ground state, with adiabatic…

desk verdict Genuinely useful qubit encodings for spin-adapted Heisenberg simulation, but the abstract overstates wavefunction convergence: the 99% fidelities are internal to the truncated subspace. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14797 v1 pith:PEO6WPST submitted 2024-12-19 quant-ph

Anthony Gandon , Alberto Baiardi , Max Rossmannek , Werner Dobrautz , Ivano Tavernelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.67.Ac75.10.Jm
keywords quantumsimulationspin-adaptedbasistotalspinsymmetryHeisenbergmodelsymmetricgroupapproachadiabaticstatepreparationqubitencodingtruncationhierarchy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a way to build quantum simulations directly in an eigenbasis of the total spin operator, avoiding the impractical basis change between spin and magnetization representations. The construction is a spin-path representation of successive spin coupling, with a cutoff on the intermediate total spin along the path; for the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain this yields a hierarchy of spin-adapted Hamiltonians whose ground-state energy and wavefunction converge quickly to the exact ones. Each truncated Hamiltonian maps to a sparse, local qubit Hamiltonian, and the paper uses these in adiabatic schedules to prepare ground-state approximations with final fidelities of 99.26% in the smallest nontrivial subspace and 99.68% in the next one for a 16-site chain. The paper demonstrates this convergence numerically on a 16-site chain, making the case that non-Abelian total-spin symmetry can be a practical resource for near-term quantum simulation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Yamaguchi-Kotani spin path: each total-spin eigenstate in a successive-coupling scheme is a path on the grid of site index versus intermediate total spin. The 'height encoding' labels each path node by that intermediate spin, making truncation at a maximum value Strunc a simple cut on node labels. The argument runs through the Dirac identity ($\hat{s}_i\cdot\hat{s}_j=\tfrac{1}{2}\hat{\pi}_{i,j}-\tfrac{1}{4}\hat{I}$), which turns the Heisenberg exchange into permutation operators; the symmetric group approach supplies local graphical rules for the action of each elementary permutation on three neighboring heights. Summing permutations band by band yields the truncated Hamiltonian, and its qubit expression is a sparse combination of ZZ Ising terms and controlled tilted-field terms, which is the property that keeps Trotter and adiabatic circuits shallow.

What would settle it

Run exact diagonalization on a small frustrated or two-dimensional Heisenberg cluster and compute the overlap of its exact ground state with the truncated spin-adapted subspace (e.g., Strunc=2). If that overlap is not close to 1, the truncated Hamiltonian's ground state will differ measurably from the exact one, and the reported low-depth fidelities will not transfer.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the symmetric group approach to spin-adapted bases can be turned into a practical quantum-computing formalism by truncating intermediate total-spin values of a successive-coupling path. Through the Dirac identity, the Heisenberg Hamiltonian becomes a sum of permutations, and in the Yamaguchi-Kotani height encoding each elementary permutation acts locally on three neighboring height variables. Cutting off the allowed heights at Strunc defines a subspace in which the Hamiltonian is a sum of band operators; mapping those bands to qubits gives sparse, local Hamiltonians that, for 16-site chains, reproduce the exact ground state to about 1e-5 in energy and support adiabatic preparation with over 99% fidelity. The same construction targets the triplet sector by changing the path boundary conditions, and Trotterized dynamics in the truncated bases converge to the exact dynamics for low-energy initial states.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the exact low-energy states, especially the ground state, have almost all their weight on spin paths whose intermediate total spin stays below the truncation threshold; the paper verifies this numerically for a 16-site 1D chain but does not establish it for frustrated lattices, higher dimensions, or electronic-structure Hamiltonians.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a 16-site antiferromagnetic chain, the height-truncated ground-state energy converges monotonically to the exact value, reaching a difference of about 1e-5 J at Strunc<3/2.
  • The Strunc<1 subspace uses only N/2 qubits and interactions made of single-qubit rotations and ZZ gates, so the smallest nontrivial truncation already halves the qubit count relative to the standard basis.
  • Adiabatic preparation with a simple linear ramp reaches final fidelities of 99.26% (Strunc<1) and 99.68% (Strunc<3/2) on 16 sites, with no optimization of the schedule.
  • Since the time evolution is formulated in a total-spin eigenbasis, Trotter errors cannot cause spin contamination, and the same construction prepares triplet states by changing only the path boundary conditions.
  • The band decomposition expresses the truncated Hamiltonian as a sum over intermediate-spin bands, so adding bands gives a systematic, controlled approximation to the exact dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the low-intermediate-spin support property extends to frustrated or higher-dimensional lattices, the same truncation would give sparse local Hamiltonians there; the paper's numerics do not test this, and the transfer is the main open question.
  • The spin-adapted basis compresses the ground-state wavefunction in L1 norm, as the paper notes from QMC results; this suggests sampling-based post-processing such as sample-based quantum diagonalization could need fewer samples for spin-adapted states, a connection the authors flag as future work.
  • A direct diagnostic for when the hierarchy is reliable would be the weight of the exact ground state on intermediate-spin bands above Strunc as a function of system size and frustration; the paper does not compute this quantity, but it is a natural quantity to measure classically for small systems.
  • The boundary-condition construction for the triplet sector implies that singlet-triplet gaps could be targeted on quantum hardware, but only after checking whether spin-1 chain ground states obey the same support property.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a formalism for encoding spin-adapted (total-spin eigenbasis) Hamiltonians of the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model into sparse, local qubit Hamiltonians. The construction uses the symmetric group approach (SGA) in the successive-coupling (height) representation, truncates the allowed intermediate total-spin values, and derives explicit qubit Hamiltonians and Trotter circuits for truncation levels S_trunc = 1/2, 1, 3/2, and 2. The authors demonstrate with exact diagonalization for N = 16 that ground-state energies of the truncated hierarchies converge quickly, and they report adiabatic Trotter schedules that prepare spin-adapted ground-state approximations with fidelities above 99% within the truncated subspaces, for singlet and triplet sectors.

Significance. If the convergence claims are fully established, this is a valuable contribution: it provides a parameter-free route to non-Abelian symmetry adaptation on qubit hardware with constant local qubit dimension, avoids the quantum Schur transform, and allows targeting total-spin sectors through boundary conditions. The strengths of the paper include a self-contained SGA-to-qubit derivation, explicit circuit constructions, exact-diagonalization benchmarks, and extension to both singlet and triplet sectors. The main weakness is that the headline wavefunction-convergence claim is not directly supported by the reported metrics, because the reported fidelities are measured against adiabatic evolution of the truncated Hamiltonians rather than against the exact full-model ground state.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. II.C and Sec. VII] The central truncation assumption is that low-energy eigenstates of the Heisenberg model have large support on spin paths with small intermediate total spin. This is supported by prior references and by the N=16 energy convergence in Fig. 3, but the paper does not report any direct wavefunction-overlap data between the truncated-subspace ground state and the exact full-model ground state. Since the abstract and conclusions assert wavefunction convergence, the authors should report such an overlap for at least the N=16 singlet and triplet cases. Without this, the claimed wavefunction convergence remains an inference from energy convergence, which is not logically sufficient in general.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV.A, Eq. (36)] The algebra in Eq. (36) appears inconsistent: -(N/2) - (N-1)/2 equals -(2N-1)/2, not -(N+1)/2. Additionally, the value Etot/J = -4.5 quoted in the caption of Fig. 9 for the S<1/2 subspace of a 16-site chain does not match either expression for N=16; please correct the equation and reconcile the caption value.
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A3) and (A4)] In Eqs. (A3) and (A4), the terms (a_{1/2} Z_{1/2} + b_{1/2} Z_{1/2}) and (a_1 Z_1 + b_1 Z_1) should contain X operators in the second term (X_{1/2} and X_1, respectively).
  3. [Sec. V.B.1, after Eq. (62)] The phrase 'andrepresentarotation' appears to be missing spaces; it should read 'and represents a rotation'.
  4. [Sec. VI.C] The sentence 'In this larger subspace, the target Hamiltonian Gamma_{<1}[H0 + H1/2] of Sec. VIB has been replaced...' is confusing because the new Hamiltonian is Gamma_{<3/2}; please rephrase to clarify which truncation level applies to the previous and current target Hamiltonians.
  5. [Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 captions] The notation for the RZZ blocks in the circuit diagrams is not fully defined; the text explains that they are two-qubit unitaries, but the caption should state this explicitly to avoid confusion with three-qubit gates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation is self-contained and benchmarked against exact diagonalization.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The truncated spin-adapted subspace Hamiltonians are obtained by an exact restriction and band decomposition of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian through symmetric-group-approach graphical rules whose coefficients a_s and b_s in Eq. (21) are fixed by SU(2) recoupling, not fitted to the target energies. The truncation threshold is a user-selected convergence parameter, and the claimed convergence of the ground-state energy to the exact full-model value is benchmarked against exact diagonalization in Fig. 3. The adiabatic-preparation fidelities quoted in Sec. VI are explicitly defined relative to the exact adiabatic evolution of the truncated Hamiltonian itself in Eq. (66), so they measure the Trotter schedule's accuracy within the truncated model rather than being passed off as a fitted prediction of the full-model wavefunction. The only self-citation in the load-bearing chain is Ref. [51] for the observation that low-energy states have large support on low intermediate total spin values, but this is paired with the independent external Ref. [76] and with the paper's own numerical convergence data, so it does not constitute a circular justification. Footnote [96] explicitly notes that truncated permutation matrices do not form a proper representation of the symmetric group, which is a limitation of the truncated formalism but not a circular step. Overall, no prediction or first-principles result reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger contains one user-selected truncation parameter and no freely fitted constants. The axioms are standard angular-momentum and symmetric-group results plus the domain assumption that low-energy states of the Heisenberg chain are concentrated on low intermediate-spin paths. No new physical entities, particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the height and step encodings and band truncations are mathematical constructions built from standard SU(2) and symmetric-group machinery.

free parameters (1)
  • truncation level S_trunc = 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2
    User-selected cap on intermediate total spin values in the height encoding. It controls the accuracy and resource trade-off of the hierarchy and is not fitted to data, but the convergence claim depends on choosing small values for the 1D antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Dirac identity expresses spin exchange as a permutation operator, Eq. (16): s_i · s_j = (1/2) pi_i,j - (1/4) I.
    This identity is the basis for rewriting the Heisenberg Hamiltonian as a sum of permutation operators in Sec. III. It is exact for spin-1/2 systems.
  • standard math Existence and properties of genealogical spin-adapted bases and Yamaguchi-Kotani spin paths, Sec. II.B, Eqs. (3)-(9).
    The height and step encodings rely on the standard SU(2) addition-of-angular-momentum construction and on the path representation of intermediate total spin values.
  • standard math Flocke-Karwowski symmetric group approach graphical rules, Sec. III.A, Eqs. (19)-(21).
    The matrix representation of elementary permutations on spin-adapted states is taken from prior literature. These rules are not re-derived in the paper, but they are used to construct the qubit Hamiltonians.
  • domain assumption The target system is the nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on a 1D chain, Sec. II.
    All numerical demonstrations and circuit constructions assume this model, with N=16 and global singlet or triplet sectors. The extension to electronic-structure Hamiltonians is explicitly future work.
  • domain assumption Low-energy eigenstates have large support on spin paths with low intermediate total spin, Sec. II.C.
    This is the premise that makes the truncation hierarchy useful. It is supported for the 1D antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain by prior VMC calculations and by Fig. 3 for N=16, but it is not established for frustrated, higher-dimensional, or electronic-structure systems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum computing in spin-adapted representations for efficient simulations of spin systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PEO6WPST

@misc{pith2026241214797,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum computing in spin-adapted representations for efficient simulations of spin systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PEO6WPST}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14797}
}
abstract

Exploiting inherent symmetries is a common and effective approach to speed up the simulation of quantum systems. However, efficiently accounting for non-Abelian symmetries, such as the $SU(2)$ total-spin symmetry, remains a major challenge. In fact, expressing total-spin eigenstates in terms of the computational basis can require an exponentially large number of coefficients. In this work, we introduce a novel formalism for designing quantum algorithms directly in an eigenbasis of the total-spin operator. Our strategy relies on the symmetric group approach in conjunction with a truncation scheme for the internal degrees of freedom of total-spin eigenstates. For the case of the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model, we show that this formalism yields a hierarchy of spin-adapted Hamiltonians, for each truncation threshold, whose ground-state energy and wave function quickly converge to their exact counterparts, calculated on the full model. These truncated Hamiltonians can be encoded with sparse and local qubit Hamiltonians that are suitable for quantum simulations. We demonstrate this by developing a state-preparation schedule to construct shallow quantum-circuit approximations, expressed in a total-spin eigenbasis, for the ground states of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian in different symmetry sectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14797 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Yamaguchi-Kotani spin-path representation of the spin-adapted subspace for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Yamaguchi-Kotani spin-path representation of the truncated spin-adapted subspace for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Convergence of the ground state energy of a 16-site Heisenberg chain for increasing trunca [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Left) Even- and odd-layer decomposition of one Trotter step of the Heisenberg unitary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Qudit unitaries implementing the time-evolution under the elementary interactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: a) Quantum circuit implementation of the unitary evolution in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Circuit implementing the unitary evolution in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Left) Example Trotter circuit for the time evolution of the initial state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Upper row: Time evolution of the total energy of the state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Adiabatic schedule in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Adiabatic schedule in the subspace with truncation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Trotter step implementation in the truncated subspace with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Yamaguchi-Kotani representation of the total-spin eigenstates for a chain of 8 sites with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Upper row: Time evolution of the total energy of the initial state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Adiabatic schedule for the 16-site Heisenberg chain in the triplet subspace with truncation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Adiabatic schedule for the 16-site Heisenberg chain in the triplet subspace with truncation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accelerated spin-adapted ground state preparation with non-variational quantum algorithms

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A two-step penalty and post-processing scheme cuts the gate complexity of non-variational spin-adapted ground state preparation from quartic to quadratic scaling for spin-rotationally symmetric Hamiltonians.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Step encoding In the step encoding, the graphical rules in Eq. (20) can be interpreted as local operators acting on two neighboring internal quantum number vector|∆Si, ∆Si+1⟩ Γ[( ˆπi,i+1)s] |u, u⟩i,i+1 = P ( ¯Si+1 = s) |u, u⟩i,i+1 , Γ[( ˆπi,i+1)s] |d, d⟩i,i+1 = P ( ¯Si+1 = s) |d, d⟩i,i+1 , Γ[( ˆπi,i+1)s] |u, d⟩i,i+1 = P ( ¯Si+1 = s) −as |u, d⟩i,i+1 + bs |...

  2. [2]

    As a result, the projector is represented by an operator acting only on a single internal variable P ( ¯Si+1 = s) = s s i+1

    Height encoding As opposed to the step encoding, the internal quantum numbers in the height encod- ing directly contain the intermediate total spin values appearing in the projectors. As a result, the projector is represented by an operator acting only on a single internal variable P ( ¯Si+1 = s) = s s i+1. The set of graphical rules can be expressed in t...

  3. [3]

    Starting from the subspace with ¯Strunc = 1, the Hamiltonian bands are composed of two types of interactions ΓaZ+bX and ΓZZ

    Elementary blocks for building approximated Trotter unitaries Within the smallest subspace with ¯Strunc = 1/2, the time-dynamics of the state|SPN ⟩ simply consist of a global phase, and all time-dependent observables are constant. Starting from the subspace with ¯Strunc = 1, the Hamiltonian bands are composed of two types of interactions ΓaZ+bX and ΓZZ. B...

  4. [4]

    (61), each further decomposed into the contributing Hamiltonian bands

    Trotter circuits for the truncated Hamiltonian in the¯Strunc = 3/2 subspace In our construction, the Hamiltonian evolution is decomposed into even and odd layers as in Eq. (61), each further decomposed into the contributing Hamiltonian bands. Bands ˆHs are composed ofΓaZ+bX interactions on odd (resp. even) indices andΓZZ interactions on even (resp. odd) i...

  5. [5]

    By definition, this subspace is ob- tained by fixing the odd qubits to ¯S2k+1 = 1 /2

    Trotter layers for other truncated symmetry subspaces We obtain the Trotter circuit for the smaller truncated subspace corresponding to ¯Strunc = 1 similarly to what has been described above. By definition, this subspace is ob- tained by fixing the odd qubits to ¯S2k+1 = 1 /2. In the circuits provided in Fig. 6, this corresponds to projecting out the qubi...

  6. [6]

    Heisenberg, 49, 619 (1928), ISSN 0044-3328, URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01328601

    W. Heisenberg, 49, 619 (1928), ISSN 0044-3328, URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01328601

    1928

  7. [7]

    P. A. M. Dirac and R. H. Fowler,123, 714 (1997), URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing. org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1929.0094

    arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    P. A. M. Dirac and R. H. Fowler,112, 661 (1997), URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing. org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1926.0133. 36

    work page arXiv 1997

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    R. N. Tazhigulov, S.-N. Sun, R. Haghshenas, H. Zhai, A. T. Tan, N. C. Rubin, R. Babbush, A. J. Minnich, and G. K.-L. Chan, PRX Quantum3, 040318 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    D.-T. Chen, P. Helms, A. R. Hale, M. Lee, C. Li, J. Gray, G. Christou, V. S. Zapf, G. K.-L. Chan, and H.-P. Cheng, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13, 2365–2370 (2022), URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00354

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Bethe, Zeitschrift für Physik71, 205 (1931), ISSN 0044-3328

    H. Bethe, Zeitschrift für Physik71, 205 (1931), ISSN 0044-3328

    1931

  4. [12]

    Karabach, G

    M. Karabach, G. Müller, H. Gould, and J. Tobochnik, Computers in Physics11, 36 (1997), ISSN 08941866

    1997

  5. [13]

    Lüscher and A

    A. Lüscher and A. M. Läuchli, Physical Review B79 (2009), ISSN 1550-235X, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.195102

    2009 doi

  6. [14]

    Nataf and F

    P. Nataf and F. Mila, Physical Review Letters 113 (2014), ISSN 1079-7114, URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.127204

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    A. M. Läuchli, J. Sudan, and R. Moessner, Physical Review B100 (2019), ISSN 2469-9969, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.155142

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Schollwöck, Rev

    U. Schollwöck, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 259 (2005), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.77.259

    2005

  9. [17]

    Schollwöck, Ann

    U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys.326, 96–192 (2011), URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop. 2010.09.012

    2011 doi

  10. [18]

    Baiardi and M

    A. Baiardi and M. Reiher, J. Chem. Phys.152 (2020), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/ 1.5129672

    2020

  11. [19]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review Letters96 (2006), ISSN 1079-7114, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.220601

    2006 doi

  12. [20]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 277–306 (2010), ISSN 1539-0756, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    Carleo and M

    G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Science355, 602–606 (2017), ISSN 1095-9203, URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2302

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    K. Choo, A. Mezzacapo, and G. Carleo, Nature Communications11 (2020), ISSN 2041-1723, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15724-9

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    R. G. Melko, G. Carleo, J. Carrasquilla, and J. I. Cirac, Nature Physics15, 887–892 (2019), ISSN 1745-2481, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0545-1

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Nomura, A

    Y. Nomura, A. S. Darmawan, Y. Yamaji, and M. Imada, Physical Review B96 (2017), ISSN 37 2469-9969, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205152

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Vidal, Physical Review Letters 99 (2007), ISSN 1079-7114, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.220405

    G. Vidal, Physical Review Letters 99 (2007), ISSN 1079-7114, URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.220405

    2007 doi

  18. [26]

    V. Murg, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review B79 (2009), ISSN 1550-235X, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.195119

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    Orús, Annals of Physics349, 117–158 (2014), ISSN 0003-4916, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013

    R. Orús, Annals of Physics349, 117–158 (2014), ISSN 0003-4916, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    D. H. Lee, J. D. Joannopoulos, and J. W. Negele, Physical Review B30, 1599–1602 (1984), ISSN 0163-1829, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.30.1599

    1984 doi

  21. [29]

    E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Physical Review B 41, 9301–9307 (1990), ISSN 1095-3795, URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.41.9301

    1990

  22. [30]

    Manousakis, Reviews of Modern Physics63, 1–62 (1991), ISSN 1539-0756, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.63.1

    E. Manousakis, Reviews of Modern Physics63, 1–62 (1991), ISSN 1539-0756, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.63.1

    1991 doi

  23. [31]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Physical Review Letters94 (2005), ISSN 1079-7114, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    J. E. Hirsch, Physical Review B31, 4403–4419 (1985), ISSN 0163-1829, URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.4403

    1985 doi

  25. [33]

    Ghanem, N

    K. Ghanem, N. Liebermann, and A. Alavi, Physical Review B103 (2021), ISSN 2469-9969, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.155135

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    H. G. Evertz, Advances in Physics52, 1–66 (2003), ISSN 1460-6976, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0001873021000049195

    2003 doi

  27. [35]

    J. E. Hirsch and R. M. Fye, Physical Review Letters56, 2521–2524 (1986), ISSN 0031-9007, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2521

    1986 doi

  28. [36]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Reviews of Modern Physics73, 33–83 (2001), ISSN 1539-0756, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.73.33

    2001 doi

  29. [37]

    Guther, R

    K. Guther, R. J. Anderson, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, D. Cleland, N. Dattani, W. Do- brautz, K. Ghanem, P. Jeszenszki, N. Liebermann, et al., The Journal of Chemical Physics 153 (2020), ISSN 1089-7690, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0005754

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. van den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zaletel, K. Temme, et al., Nature618, 500 (2023), ISSN 1476-4687. 38

    2023

  31. [39]

    Robledo-Moreno, M

    J. Robledo-Moreno, M. Motta, H. Haas, A. Javadi-Abhari, P. Jurcevic, W. Kirby, S. Mar- tiel, K. Sharma, S. Sharma, T. Shirakawa, et al.,Chemistry Beyond Exact Solutions on a Quantum-Centric Supercomputer(2024), 2405.05068

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Yoshioka, M

    N. Yoshioka, M. Amico, W. Kirby, P. Jurcevic, A. Dutt, B. Fuller, S. Garion, H. Haas, I. Hamamura, A. Ivrii, et al.,Diagonalization of large many-body Hamiltonians on a quantum processor (2024), 2407.14431

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    T. A. Chowdhury, K. Yu, M. A. Shamim, M. L. Kabir, and R. S. Sufian, Physical Review Research 6, 033107 (2024), ISSN 2643-1564

    2024

  34. [42]

    Flocke and J

    N. Flocke and J. Karwowski, Physical Review B55, 8287 (1997), ISSN 0163-1829, 1095-3795

    1997

  35. [43]

    Flocke and J

    N. Flocke and J. Karwowski, inTheoretical and Computational Chemistry(Elsevier, 2002), vol. 10, pp. 603–634, ISBN 978-0-444-50889-8

    2002

  36. [45]

    K. Ido, M. Kawamura, Y. Motoyama, K. Yoshimi, Y. Yamaji, S. Todo, N. Kawashima, and T. Misawa, Computer Physics Communications298, 109093 (2024), ISSN 0010-4655, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109093

    2024

  37. [46]

    Li Manni, I

    G. Li Manni, I. Fdez. Galván, A. Alavi, F. Aleotti, F. Aquilante, J. Autschbach, D. Avagliano, A. Baiardi, J. J. Bao, S. Battaglia, et al., Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation19, 6933–6991 (2023), ISSN 1549-9626, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00182

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    Tatsuaki, Physical Review E61, 3199–3206 (2000), ISSN 1095-3787, URLhttp://dx

    W. Tatsuaki, Physical Review E61, 3199–3206 (2000), ISSN 1095-3787, URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.3199

    2000 doi

  39. [48]

    I. P. McCulloch and M. Gulácsi, Europhysics Letters57, 852 (2002), ISSN 0295-5075

    2002

  40. [49]

    Sharma and G

    S. Sharma and G. K.-L. Chan, The Journal of Chemical Physics136, 124121 (2012), ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690

    2012

  41. [50]

    Singh and G

    S. Singh and G. Vidal, Physical Review B86 (2012), ISSN 1550-235X, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.195114

    2012 doi

  42. [51]

    Keller and M

    S. Keller and M. Reiher, J. Chem. Phys.144 (2016), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1. 4944921

    2016 doi

  43. [52]

    Vieijra and J

    T. Vieijra and J. Nys, Physical Review B104, 045123 (2021), ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969

    2021

  44. [53]

    Dobrautz, S

    W. Dobrautz, S. D. Smart, and A. Alavi, The Journal of Chemical Physics151, 094104 (2019), ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690. 39

    2019

  45. [54]

    Dobrautz, O

    W. Dobrautz, O. Weser, N. A. Bogdanov, A. Alavi, and G. Li Manni, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation17, 5684–5703 (2021), ISSN 1549-9626, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00589

    2021 doi

  46. [55]

    S. Yun, W. Dobrautz, H. Luo, and A. Alavi, Physical Review B104 (2021), ISSN 2469-9969, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235102

    2021 doi

  47. [56]

    Dobrautz, V

    W. Dobrautz, V. M. Katukuri, N. A. Bogdanov, D. Kats, G. Li Manni, and A. Alavi, Physical Review B 105, 195123 (2022), ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969

    2022

  48. [57]

    Bravyi, J

    S. Bravyi, J. M. Gambetta, A. Mezzacapo, and K. Temme,Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic Hamiltonians (2017), 1701.08213

    2017 arXiv

  49. [58]

    M. H. Cheng, Y.-C. Chen, Q. Wang, V. Bartsch, M. S. Kim, A. Hu, and M.-H. Hsieh, Unleashing Quantum Simulation Advantages: Hamiltonian Subspace Encoding for Resource Efficient Quantum Simulations(2023), 2309.09370

    2023

  50. [59]

    Picozzi and J

    D. Picozzi and J. Tennyson,8, 035026 (2023), ISSN 2058-9565, URLhttps://iopscience. iop.org/article/10.1088/2058-9565/acd86c

    2023 doi

  51. [60]

    Setia, R

    K. Setia, R. Chen, J. E. Rice, A. Mezzacapo, M. Pistoia, and J. D. Whitfield,16, 6091 (2020), ISSN 1549-9618, 1549-9626, URLhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00113

    2020 doi

  52. [61]

    Shee, P.-K

    Y. Shee, P.-K. Tsai, C.-L. Hong, H.-C. Cheng, and H.-S. Goan, 4, 023154 (2022), ISSN 2643-1564, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023154

    2022 doi

  53. [62]

    Bärtschi and S

    A. Bärtschi and S. Eidenbenz, in Fundamentals of Computation Theory, edited by L. A. Gąsieniec, J. Jansson, and C. Levcopoulos (Springer International Publishing, 2019), pp. 126–139, ISBN 978-3-030-25027-0

    2019

  54. [63]

    Piroli, G

    L. Piroli, G. Styliaris, and J. I. Cirac,Approximating many-body quantum states with quantum circuits and measurements(2024), 2403.07604

    2024 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Raveh and R

    D. Raveh and R. I. Nepomechie,Dicke states as matrix product states(2024), 2408.04729

    2024 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Sugisaki, S

    K. Sugisaki, S. Yamamoto, S. Nakazawa, K. Toyota, K. Sato, D. Shiomi, and T. Takui, Chemical Physics Letters737, 100002 (2019), ISSN 00092614

    2019

  57. [66]

    Carbone, D

    A. Carbone, D. E. Galli, M. Motta, and B. Jones, Symmetry14, 624 (2022), ISSN 2073-8994

    2022

  58. [67]

    Sugisaki, S

    K. Sugisaki, S. Yamamoto, S. Nakazawa, K. Toyota, K. Sato, D. Shiomi, and T. Takui, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A120, 6459 (2016), ISSN 1089-5639

    2016

  59. [68]

    Marti-Dafcik, H

    D. Marti-Dafcik, H. G. A. Burton, and D. P. Tew,Spin coupling is all you need: Encoding strong electron correlation on quantum computers(2024), 2404.18878. 40

    2024 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Mörchen, G

    M. Mörchen, G. H. Low, T. Weymuth, H. Liu, M. Troyer, and M. Reiher, arXiv p. 2409.08910 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  61. [70]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  62. [71]

    B. T. Gard, L. Zhu, G. S. Barron, N. J. Mayhall, S. E. Economou, and E. Barnes, npj Quantum Information6 (2020), ISSN 2056-6387, URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41534-019-0240-1

    2020

  63. [72]

    G.-L. R. Anselmetti, D. Wierichs, C. Gogolin, and R. M. Parrish, New Journal of Physics23, 113010 (2021), ISSN 1367-2630

    2021

  64. [73]

    R. D. P. East, G. Alonso-Linaje, and C.-Y. Park,All you need is spin: SU(2) equivariant variational quantum circuits based on spin networks(2023), 2309.07250

    2023

  65. [74]

    H. G. A. Burton, Physical Review Research6, 023300 (2024), ISSN 2643-1564

    2024

  66. [75]

    D. W. Berry, Y. Tong, T. Khattar, A. White, T. I. Kim, S. Boixo, L. Lin, S. Lee, G. K.-L. Chan, R. Babbush, et al., arXiv p. 2409.11748 (2024)

    2024

  67. [76]

    K. Seki, T. Shirakawa, and S. Yunoki, Physical Review A101, 052340 (2020), ISSN 2469- 9926, 2469-9934

    2020

  68. [77]

    V. M. Bastidas, N. Fitzpatrick, K. J. Joven, Z. M. Rossi, S. Islam, T. V. Voorhis, I. L. Chuang, and Y. Liu,Unification of Finite Symmetries in Simulation of Many-body Systems on Quantum Computers(2024), 2411.05058

    2024 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Lacroix, Physical Review Letters125, 230502 (2020), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    D. Lacroix, Physical Review Letters125, 230502 (2020), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    2020

  70. [79]

    Tsuchimochi, Y

    T. Tsuchimochi, Y. Mori, and S. L. Ten-no, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043142 (2020), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043142

    2020 doi

  71. [80]

    Bacon, I

    D. Bacon, I. L. Chuang, and A. W. Harrow, Physical Review Letters97, 170502 (2006), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114

    2006

  72. [81]

    Vieijra, C

    T. Vieijra, C. Casert, J. Nys, W. De Neve, J. Haegeman, J. Ryckebusch, and F. Verstraete, Physical Review Letters124 (2020), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114, URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.097201

    2020 doi

  73. [82]

    Pauncz, Spin Eigenfunctions (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1979), ISBN 978-1-4684-8528-8 978-1-4684-8526-4, URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4684-8526-4

    R. Pauncz, Spin Eigenfunctions (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1979), ISBN 978-1-4684-8528-8 978-1-4684-8526-4, URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4684-8526-4

    1979 doi

  74. [83]

    Schnack and M

    J. Schnack and M. Luban, Physical Review B63, 014418 (2000), ISSN 0163-1829, 1095-3795

    2000

  75. [84]

    Schnalle and J

    R. Schnalle and J. Schnack, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry29, 403 (2010), 41 ISSN 0144-235X, 1366-591X, 1003.1909

    2010 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Heitmann and J

    T. Heitmann and J. Schnack, Physical Review B99 (2019), ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.134405

    2019 doi

  77. [86]

    Li Manni, W

    G. Li Manni, W. Dobrautz, and A. Alavi, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation16, 2202 (2020), ISSN 1549-9618

    2020

  78. [87]

    Li Manni, W

    G. Li Manni, W. Dobrautz, N. A. Bogdanov, K. Guther, and A. Alavi, J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 4727 (2021)

    2021

  79. [88]

    S. R. White, R. M. Noack, and D. J. Scalapino, Physical Review Letters73, 886 (1994), ISSN 0031-9007

    1994

  80. [89]

    Schwandt, F

    D. Schwandt, F. Alet, and M. Oshikawa, Physical Review B89, 104416 (2014)

    2014

  81. [90]

    J. S. Kottmann and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Physical Review A105, 032449 (2022), ISSN 2469- 9926, 2469-9934

    2022

  82. [91]

    Moshinsky, pp 289-377 of Many-Body Problems and Other Selected Topics in Theoretical Physics

    M. Moshinsky, pp 289-377 of Many-Body Problems and Other Selected Topics in Theoretical Physics. Moshinsky, M. Brody, T. A. Jacob, G. (eds.). New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1966. (1967)

    1967

  83. [92]

    Shavitt, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry12, 131 (1977), ISSN 1097-461X

    I. Shavitt, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry12, 131 (1977), ISSN 1097-461X

    1977

  84. [93]

    Shavitt, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry14, 5 (1978), ISSN 1097-461X

    I. Shavitt, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry14, 5 (1978), ISSN 1097-461X

    1978

  85. [94]

    Paldus, The Journal of Chemical Physics61, 5321 (1974), ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690

    J. Paldus, The Journal of Chemical Physics61, 5321 (1974), ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690

    1974

  86. [95]

    Paldus, Physical Review A14, 1620 (1976)

    J. Paldus, Physical Review A14, 1620 (1976)

    1976

  87. [96]

    Paldus, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry59, 37 (2021), ISSN 1572-8897

    J. Paldus, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry59, 37 (2021), ISSN 1572-8897

    2021

  88. [97]

    Duch and J

    W. Duch and J. Karwowski, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry22, 783 (1982), ISSN 1097-461X

    1982

  89. [98]

    Pauncz, Spin Eigenfunctions (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1979), ISBN 978-1-4684-8528-8 978-1-4684-8526-4

    R. Pauncz, Spin Eigenfunctions (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1979), ISBN 978-1-4684-8528-8 978-1-4684-8526-4

    1979

  90. [99]

    Ruedenberg, Physical Review Letters27, 1105 (1971)

    K. Ruedenberg, Physical Review Letters27, 1105 (1971)

    1971

  91. [100]

    Manley and J

    J. Manley and J. Gerratt, Computer Physics Communications31, 75 (1984), ISSN 00104655

    1984

  92. [101]

    In particular, truncated permutation matrices in the height-representation do not necessarily square to identity

    Note that the height-truncated spin-adapted subspaces are not proper representations of the symmetry group SN, as the group product is broken by the height-truncation. In particular, truncated permutation matrices in the height-representation do not necessarily square to identity

  93. [102]

    A. N. Ciavarella, S. Caspar, H. Singh, M. J. Savage, and P. Lougovski,Simulating Heisenberg 42 Interactions in the Ising Model with Strong Drive Fields(2023), 2207.09438

    2023 arXiv

  94. [103]

    A. N. Ciavarella, S. Caspar, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, Quantum7, 970 (2023), ISSN 2521- 327X, 2210.04965

    2023 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Langer, M

    S. Langer, M. Heyl, I. P. McCulloch, and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Physical Review B84, 205115 (2011)

    2011

  96. [105]

    J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, A. Piñeiro Orioli, and J. Marino, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America119, e2122599119 (2022), ISSN 0027-8424

    2022

  97. [106]

    E. A. Coello Pérez, J. Bonitati, D. Lee, S. Quaglioni, and K. A. Wendt, Physical Review A 105, 032403 (2022), ISSN 2469-9926, 2469-9934

    2022

  98. [107]

    X.-s. Ma, B. Dakic, W. Naylor, A. Zeilinger, and P. Walther, Nature Physics7, 399 (2011), ISSN 1745-2481

    2011

  99. [108]

    Vidal and C

    G. Vidal and C. M. Dawson, Physical Review A69, 010301 (2004), ISSN 1050-2947, 1094- 1622, URL http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0307177

    2004 arXiv

  100. [109]

    A125, 4727 (2021), ISSN 1520-5215

    G.LiManni, W.Dobrautz, N.A.Bogdanov, K.Guther, andA.Alavi, TheJournalofPhysical Chemistry. A125, 4727 (2021), ISSN 1520-5215

    2021

  101. [110]

    Temme, S

    K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Physical Review Letters119 (2017), ISSN 1079- 7114, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509

    2017 doi

  102. [111]

    Z. Cai, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, W. J. Huggins, Y. Li, J. R. McClean, and T. E. O’Brien, Reviews of Modern Physics95 (2023), ISSN 1539-0756, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005

    2023 doi

  103. [112]

    Takagi, S

    R. Takagi, S. Endo, S. Minagawa, and M. Gu, npj Quantum Information8 (2022), ISSN 2056-6387, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41534-022-00618-z

    2022 doi

  104. [113]

    Lolur, M

    P. Lolur, M. Skogh, W. Dobrautz, C. Warren, J. Biznárová, A. Osman, G. Tancredi, G. Wendin, J. Bylander, and M. Rahm, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation19, 783–789 (2023), ISSN 1549-9626, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00807

    2023 doi

  105. [114]

    van den Berg, Z

    E. van den Berg, Z. K. Minev, A. Kandala, and K. Temme, Nat. Phys.19, 1116–1121 (2023), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02042-2

    2023 doi

  106. [115]

    García-Pérez, M

    G. García-Pérez, M. A. Rossi, B. Sokolov, F. Tacchino, P. K. Barkoutsos, G. Mazzola, I. Tavernelli, and S. Maniscalco, PRX Quantum 2 (2021), ISSN 2691-3399, URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040342

    2021 doi

  107. [116]

    Huang, Nat

    H.-Y. Huang, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 81–81 (2022), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 43 s42254-021-00411-5

    2022

  108. [117]

    L. E. Fischer, T. Dao, I. Tavernelli, and F. Tacchino, Phys. Rev. A109 (2024), ISSN 2469- 9934, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.062415

    2024 doi

  109. [118]

    Chamberland, G

    C. Chamberland, G. Zhu, T. J. Yoder, J. B. Hertzberg, and A. W. Cross, Phys. Rev. X10 (2020), ISSN 2160-3308, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011022

    2020 doi

  110. [119]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Physics Letters A93, 464 (1983), ISSN 0375-9601. Appendix A: Hamiltonian and unitary evolution in the subspace ¯Strunc = 2 In this section we derive the Hamiltonian and the corresponding Trotter circuit in the sub- space ¯Strunc = 2, finding additional simpli...

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.