Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 128 references

Gravitational Waves From Dark Binaries With Finite-Range Dark Forces

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a finite-range dark force between macroscopic dark matter objects reshapes binary formation and inspiral, producing a stochastic gravitational-wave background with knee and ankle features tied to the dark force…

desk verdict A serious, internally consistent calculation of SGWB from dark binaries with finite-range dark forces; the qualitative knee features are robust, but the amplitude/detectability claims inherit O(1) uncertainty from gravity-only N-body calibration constants. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15158 v1 pith:AXKW2AC5 submitted 2024-12-19 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

Yang Bai , Sida Lu , Nicholas Orlofsky This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords gravitationalwavesstochasticwavebackgroundmacroscopicdarkmatterbinariesforcefinite-rangemediatorYukawapotentialbinaryevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dark matter could include compact macroscopic objects that attract one another not only gravitationally but through a new, finite-range dark force. This paper works out what binaries of such objects would look like as sources of gravitational waves. It argues that the finite range of the force reshuffles which binaries form and how quickly they merge, and that the resulting stochastic gravitational-wave background is enhanced at intermediate frequencies and carries sharp knee and ankle features, the most common one sitting at the frequency where emission of the dark-force mediator turns on. If the calculation is right, the background from sub-solar-mass dark binaries is within reach of next-generation space- and ground-based gravitational-wave observatories. The main uncertainty is that the initial binary population is calibrated to gravity-only simulations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective potential of the binary, which combines the usual gravitational and centrifugal terms with a Yukawa attractive term of range set by the inverse mediator mass. When the dark-force enhancement exceeds a threshold, this potential has an inner dark-force-dominated minimum, an outer gravity-like minimum, and a barrier between them, so a binary can live in several distinct orbital configurations as its angular momentum is radiated away. The paper's main calculational tool is an approximate piecewise gravitational-wave emission spectrum for a single binary, together with a three-region probability distribution for initial semimajor axis and eccentricity that follows from two chances for a pair to decouple from the Hubble flow, once inside and once outside the dark-force range. The threshold at which the binary's orbital frequency reaches the mediator mass is what turns on mediator radiation and produces the most common knee in the background spectrum.

What would settle it

A cosmological N-body simulation that includes the Yukawa dark force and measures the mapping from initial comoving separation to initial semimajor axis and eccentricity would settle the weakest link: if the calibration constants depart from 0.4 and 0.8 by more than an order-one factor, the predicted merger rates, region boundaries, and background amplitude change. Observationally, a detected stochastic gravitational-wave background with the predicted overall shape that lacks the knee at the redshifted mediator frequency would refute the spectral-feature claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that replacing the massless mediator of an attractive dark force with a massive one changes the predicted stochastic gravitational-wave background qualitatively, not just in detail. A massive mediator means the force acts only inside a range set by the inverse mediator mass, so a binary can first inspiral under gravity alone, then feel an enhanced attractive force before it starts radiating the mediator, and finally radiate mediator plus enhanced gravitational waves. The authors show that the individual binary emission spectrum is piecewise, following the gravity-only form at low frequencies, a dark-force-enhanced form between two characteristic frequencies, and the massless-dark-force form at high frequencies, with a suppressed gap between the first two stages. The initial binary separation distribution splits into three disconnected regions, with binaries that decouple under the dark force but feel only gravitational tides being the most eccentric. Superposed into a cosmological background, these pieces produce plunging knees at frequencies tied to the mediator mass and to the dark-force enhancement, plus a pile-up ankle when merger times are dominated by the cosmic decoupling time, and the spectrum returns to the gravity-only and massless-mediator limits for very heavy and very light mediators.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction leans on two calibration constants, 0.4 and 0.8, taken from simulations of gravity-only binary formation, being unchanged when the finite-range dark force is present.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the calculation is right, the stochastic gravitational-wave background from sub-solar-mass dark binaries with a finite-range dark force is enhanced at intermediate frequencies relative to the gravity-only case and could be detectable by next-generation space- and ground-based observatories when dark matter objects make up one percent of the dark matter.
  • A knee or ankle in a measured background at a frequency near the redshifted mediator mass would observationally indicate a dark force with that mediator mass.
  • The predicted spectrum interpolates between the gravity-only and massless-mediator limits as the mediator becomes very heavy or very light, so finite-range dark forces connect and extend the two previously studied cases.
  • Binaries that decouple under the dark force but are tidally perturbed only by gravity are the most eccentric and shortest lived, raising the merger rate and shifting the frequencies at which the background peaks.
  • For sufficiently heavy mediators, binaries merge too early and their gravitational waves are redshifted away, so the high-frequency part of the background can be suppressed or cut off entirely.
  • A measured knee that does not move with redshift the way a mediator-mass feature should would challenge the mediator-radiation interpretation and point to a different origin for the spectral break.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: because the knee frequency is set by the redshifted mediator mass, a multi-band detection of multiple knees from the same binary population could break the degeneracy between mediator mass and merger redshift.
  • Editorial extension: the calculation drops higher harmonics of the orbital frequency; for the highly eccentric, non-closed orbits in the mixed and dark-force-dominated stages, harmonics could fill the predicted emission gap and smooth the sharpest knees, changing detectability at those frequencies.
  • Editorial extension: the same piecewise inspiral logic applies to any compact binary with an additional finite-range force, so a search for such knees could also be run on catalogs of ordinary black-hole and neutron-star mergers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper computes the stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) from binaries of macroscopic dark matter (MDM) interacting through a finite-range attractive dark force with mediator mass m_med. After classifying binary evolution into four configurations determined by a Yukawa barrier in the effective potential, the authors construct a semi-analytic piecewise emission spectrum dEGW/df (Eq. 41) and combine it with an initial binary distribution derived from nearest-neighbor decoupling and tidal-torque arguments (Eqs. 43-58). The resulting SGWB (Eq. 59) is evaluated for a range of mediator masses and MDM masses, yielding knee and ankle features associated with m_med and the force-activation frequency f_beta, an enhancement relative to gravity-only at intermediate frequencies, and convergence to the gravity-only and massless-DF limits in the appropriate limits. Detectability is assessed against SKA, LISA, BBO, LIGO-Virgo, and Cosmic Explorer sensitivity curves.

Significance. The work is a timely and largely self-contained extension of the massless-DF analysis in Ref. [62] to the more realistic finite-range case. Its main strengths are the analytical transparency of the orbital-evolution results, the explicit comparison between numerical and semi-analytic per-binary spectra in Fig. 2, and the clear limit checks in Fig. 9, which give confidence that the qualitative knee and ankle phenomenology is physically meaningful. The predicted correlation of spectral features with m_med is a falsifiable target for future detectors. However, the quantitative amplitude and detectability claims rest on O(1) calibration constants and on approximations whose numerical impact is not fully quantified; the paper is appropriately cautious in Sec. 5.3, but the abstract and figures inherit those uncertainties. With those caveats the result is a useful advance, although the absolute normalization is not yet on as firm a footing as the spectral-shape predictions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Eqs. (48)-(51)] The initial-condition distribution P(a0,e0) that drives the SGWB integral (59) is fixed by c1=0.4 and c2=0.8, which the text states are taken from gravity-only simulations because "No numerical simulation has been performed including a DF". These constants propagate nonlinearly into the result: a0 is proportional to c1, b0/a0 is proportional to c2, and the merger lifetimes in Eqs. (15), (20), and (27) scale as high powers of a0, so O(1) shifts in c1 or c2 can change the predicted SGWB amplitude and the detectability boundaries in Figs. 6-7 by more than an order of magnitude. Since the finite-range DF changes both the decoupling condition and the tidal torque, the x-, y-, beta-, and m_med-dependence of c1 and c2 is plausibly non-negligible. I request either a dedicated robustness scan over c1 and c2 or an explicit reframing of all amplitude and detectability claims as order-of-magnitude estimates.
  2. [§3.3 and §5, Eq. (41)] The piecewise emission spectrum uses the transition frequency ftrans, which Sec. 3.3 says is "obtained numerically from the binary evolution", but the paper does not provide a formula, algorithm, or code for ftrans(a0,e0) over the full initial-condition space of the SGWB integral (59). The spectral position of the GR branch and the width of the zero-emission gap therefore cannot be checked from the text, and the SGWB curves in Figs. 6-9 are not reproducible from the material given. Please supply the functional form or numerical procedure for ftrans, or release the code used for the convolution.
  3. [§3.2.3 and §3.3, Eq. (41) and footnote 5] The approximation that the emission vanishes for ftrans < fGW,s < f_beta is acknowledged to be partly an artifact of neglecting harmonics with fGW,s = 2/T, and footnote 5 notes that the gap disappears if the barrier is not crossed. Since the SGWB in Fig. 9 exhibits a visible deficit near the cutoff for m_med = 10^-10 eV caused by this gap, and since the knee and ankle phenomenology is a central claim, the robustness of the spectral features to harmonic filling should be quantified rather than assumed. An estimate of the first-harmonic contribution inside the gap, or a demonstration that the gap integrates to a negligible fraction of the SGWB, would settle this concern.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the SGWB is "detectable by both space- and ground-based gravitational wave observatories", which is stronger than the conclusion in Sec. 5.3 that only a few parameter choices are detectable at SKA or LISA and that next-generation observatories are generally required once gravitational-lensing constraints on fDM are imposed. Please qualify the abstract accordingly.
  2. [§4, Eq. (46)] The step-function decoupling approximation in Eq. (46) is used without a quantitative error estimate. Figure 4 demonstrates that it captures the multi-valued decoupling structure qualitatively, but a brief estimate of the resulting uncertainty in a0 and in the region boundaries (53)-(58) would help the reader judge the robustness of the three-region decomposition.
  3. [§3.3, Eq. (41)] The conditions under which the beta-enhanced branch f_beta < fGW,s < m_med exists are not stated; if f_beta is larger than or equal to m_med, that branch should be absent, and this case appears to be implicit in the parameter scan but is never spelled out in the text.
  4. [§4, after Eq. (42)] The factor ccharge = 1 (1/2) for a scalar (vector) DF mediator affects the overall SGWB normalization, so a one-sentence derivation or a reference explaining this counting factor would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SGWB calculation is self-contained, with only external calibration constants c1 and c2 and standard formulas from prior work, none of which encode the claimed finite-range-DF spectral features.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation—the SGWB with knee/ankle features—is not constructed from its own output. The input force law (1), the piecewise emission spectrum (41), and the binary initial distribution from (48) and (51) are independent ingredients. The knee at fGW = mmed follows from the physical threshold fGW,s > mmed for mediator emission (Sec. 3.2.4) and the redshift integration (59); it is not fitted to the SGWB. The fbeta knee follows from Kepler's law at the DF range. The calibration constants c1 = 0.4 and c2 = 0.8 are taken from gravity-only simulations [56], as the paper explicitly states, and are not derived from the SGWB being predicted; this is an external input whose O(1) uncertainty affects amplitude but does not make the prediction equal to the fit. Formulas imported from the authors' previous work [62] (dipole emission rates, massless-DF spectrum) are standard derivations with stated assumptions that do not include the finite-range result, so the self-citation is not load-bearing in a circular way.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on several model parameters (scanned benchmark values) and on O(1) calibration constants c1 and c2 taken from gravity-only N-body simulations, plus a set of modeling approximations (Poisson initial distribution, decoupling criterion, sharp mediator emission threshold, period-averaged emission without higher harmonics). These are acknowledged in the text but not independently verified for the DF case.

free parameters (7)
  • beta (dark force enhancement factor) = 100 (benchmark, scanned)
    Strength of the dark force relative to gravity; chosen by hand in the main figures. Central to the enhancement amplitude and the existence of the effective potential barrier.
  • m_med (dark force mediator mass) = 10^-23 to 10^-12 eV (scanned)
    Sets the range of the dark force and the position of the knee at f_GW = m_med. Scanned, not fitted.
  • M_MDM (macroscopic dark matter mass) = 10^-4 to 1 solar mass (scanned)
    Mass of the compact dark objects; sets merger rates and frequency cutoffs.
  • rho_MDM (internal density) = (0.1 GeV)^4 (benchmark)
    Sets the radius and maximum emission frequency of each MDM; fixed to a common benchmark.
  • f_DM (dark matter fraction in MDMs) = 10^-2 and 10^-3
    Abundance of MDMs; directly scales the SGWB amplitude. Values chosen near the lensing-allowed upper range.
  • c1 (semimajor axis calibration) = 0.4
    Adopted from gravity-only N-body simulations [56]; no DF simulation performed. Affects a0 and hence merger rates and spectral amplitudes.
  • c2 (semiminor axis calibration) = 0.8
    Adopted from gravity-only N-body simulations [56]; no DF simulation performed. Affects e0 and merger lifetimes.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Poisson nearest-neighbor initial distribution, Eq. (43)
    Assumes random homogeneous spatial distribution of MDMs before equality, following Refs. [55-57,62].
  • domain assumption Decoupling condition (acceleration)*H^-1 ~ H d, Eq. (45)
    Standard order-one criterion for binary formation; not derived from first principles.
  • ad hoc to paper Step-function decoupling approximation, Eq. (46)
    Approximates the Yukawa force by a sharp boundary at x R_dec = m_med^-1; authors acknowledge multi-valuedness and use the earliest decoupling branch.
  • domain assumption Mediator emission only when f_GW,s > m_med
    Threshold approximation; authors note binaries with r_min < a_emit < r_max may emit partially, requiring full numerical orbits.
  • domain assumption Period-averaged emission at fundamental frequency f_GW,s = 2/T, no higher harmonics
    Standard orbit-averaging; authors note harmonics may matter for eccentric non-Keplerian orbits (Sec. 6).
  • domain assumption All MDMs have equal mass and equal dark charge
    Model simplification used in the force law Eq. (1); scalar mediator variants differ by O(1) factors.
  • domain assumption MDMs form before matter-radiation equality
    Required for the decoupling mechanism to operate before equality, as assumed in Sec. 4.
invented entities (1)
  • Massive dark force mediator (vector boson with mass m_med) independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates a finite-range attractive fifth force between MDMs, modifying binary formation and evolution and producing spectral knees.
    The mediator mass is directly imprinted on the SGWB as a knee at f_GW ~ m_med, giving an observational handle at SKA, LISA, BBO, and CE. The entity itself is inherited from BSM dark sector models.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Waves From Dark Binaries With Finite-Range Dark Forces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AXKW2AC5

@misc{pith2026241215158,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Waves From Dark Binaries With Finite-Range Dark Forces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AXKW2AC5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15158}
}
read the original abstract

This paper calculates the stochastic gravitational wave background from dark binaries with finite-range attractive dark forces, complementing previous works which consider long-range dark forces. The finiteness of the dark force range can dramatically modify both the initial distributions and evolution histories of the binaries. The generated gravitational wave spectrum is enhanced in the intermediate frequency regime and exhibits interesting "knee" and "ankle" features, the most common of which is related to the turn on of the dark force mediator radiation. Other such spectral features are related to changes in the binary merger lifetime and the probability distribution for the initial binary separation. The stochastic gravitational wave background from sub-solar-mass dark binaries is detectable by both space- and ground-based gravitational wave observatories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15158 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: An example of the LHS of (30) when β > βbarrier. For some values of J there may be either a single extremum or three extrema in the effective potential, corresponding to the red/blue curves and the black curve in the right panel, respectively. Right: Examples of the effective potential in the regimes J ≫ Jmax (blue), Jmin < J < Jmax (black), and J ≪ Jmin (red solid) with Jmax and Jmin given in (31) and (32). I… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: The three benchmark binary initial configurations (horizontal lines) whose evolutions are examined numerically, corresponding to the first three configurations described in Sec. 3.2. All benchmarks share the same J0 = 2.93 × 1072. The initial energy E0 of the benchmarks are E0/(−GM2 MDMmmed) = 0.0004, 0.008, and 0.08 for the blue, orange, and green lines, respectively. Right: The numerically calculated (solid)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A schematic of the time-ordering of the possible configurations a binary can evolve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The scale factor at decoupling Rdec for a nearest neighbor MDM pair as a function of their initial comoving separation x. Here, MMDM = 10−4M⊙, mmed = 10−20 eV, and β is varied as labeled in each panel. The blue solid lines show the analytic result from (45) with F give…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: An illustration of the three different regions of (a0, 1 − e0), with mmed = 10−18eV ≈ (6×10−12 Mpc)−1 , β = 100, and MMDM = 10−4M⊙. Binaries with a lifetime equal to the age of the universe are shown by the black dashed curve, with those that merge before today f…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The calculated SGWB spectra for various MMDM and mmed, with ρMDM = (0.1 GeV)4 , β = 100, and fDM = 10−2 . The different panels corresponds to mmed = 10−23–10−12 eV from top-left to bottom-right, and in each panel the SGWB for MMDM = 10−4–1 M⊙ are presented. Also shown …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The heat maps of the probability distribution function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A collection of the SGWB for β = 100, MMDM = 10−4M⊙, and fDM = 10−2 . The SGWB from gravity-only (dashed black) and massless DF mediator (solid black) scenarios are shown as benchmarks, to be compared with the results for mmed = 10−25–10−10eV (colored curves). It is cl…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The SGWB for β = 100, MMDM = 10−4M⊙, mmed = 10−16 eV, and fDM = 10−2 (blue curve), compared with the spectral shape at fβ < fGW < mmed and fGW ≲ fβ analyzed as in the main text (dashed red and dashed black, respectively). The power-law behavior inferred from the massl…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [62]

    Y. Bai, S. Lu, and N. Orlofsky, Gravitational waves from more attractive dark binaries , JCAP 08 (2024) 057, [ arXiv:2312.13378]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Aasi et al., Advanced LIGO, Class

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, J. Aasi et al., Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 074001, [ arXiv:1411.4547]

    arXiv 2015

  3. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 6 061102, [ arXiv:1602.03837]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [3]

    Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L8, [arXiv:2306.16213]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars , Astrophys

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L9, [arXiv:2306.16217]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    Afzal et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics , Astrophys

    NANOGrav Collaboration, A. Afzal et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L11, [arXiv:2306.16219]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [6]

    Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 952 (2023), no. 2 L37, [ arXiv:2306.16220]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I

    EPTA Collaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis , Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A48, [ arXiv:2306.16224]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 128 references
  1. [8]

    Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III

    EPTA, InPTA: Collaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals , Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50, [ arXiv:2306.16214]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array IV

    EPTA Collaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array IV. Search for continuous gravitational wave signals , arXiv:2306.16226

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: V

    EPTA Collaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: V. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter and the early Universe, arXiv:2306.16227

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L6, [arXiv:2306.16215]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    D. J. Reardon et al., The Gravitational-wave Background Null Hypothesis: Characterizing Noise in Millisecond Pulsar Arrival Times with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023), no. 1 L7, [ arXiv:2306.16229]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Zic et al., The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Third Data Release , arXiv:2306.16230

    A. Zic et al., The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Third Data Release , arXiv:2306.16230

    arXiv

  7. [14]

    Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res

    H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023), no. 7 075024, [ arXiv:2306.16216]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. Franciolini, G. H¨ utsi, A. Iovino, M. Lewicki, M. Raidal, 33 J. Urrutia, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae,What is the source of the PTA GW signal? , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 2 023522, [ arXiv:2308.08546]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Mandic, S

    V. Mandic, S. Bird, and I. Cholis, Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background due to Primordial Binary Black Hole Mergers , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 20 201102, [arXiv:1608.06699]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Wang, Y.-F

    S. Wang, Y.-F. Wang, Q.-G. Huang, and T. G. F. Li, Constraints on the Primordial Black Hole Abundance from the First Advanced LIGO Observation Run Using the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 19 191102, [arXiv:1610.08725]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Raidal, V

    M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae,Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Hole Mergers, JCAP 09 (2017) 037, [ arXiv:1707.01480]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 6 063001, [ arXiv:1801.05235]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Pujolas, V

    O. Pujolas, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae,Prospects for probing gravitational waves from primordial black hole binaries , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 8 083521, [arXiv:2107.03379]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, S

    J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, S. Jaraba, and S. Kuroyanagi,The stochastic gravitational wave background from close hyperbolic encounters of primordial black holes in dense clusters , Phys. Dark Univ. 36 (2022) 101009, [ arXiv:2109.11376]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [22]

    V. Atal, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, A. Sanglas, and N. Triantafyllou, Constraining changes in the merger history of BH and PBH binaries with the stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 12 123522, [ arXiv:2201.12218]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Braglia, J

    M. Braglia, J. Garcia-Bellido, and S. Kuroyanagi, Tracking the origin of black holes with the stochastic gravitational wave background popcorn signal , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 519 (2023), no. 4 6008–6019, [ arXiv:2201.13414]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    I. K. Banerjee and U. K. Dey, Probing the origin of primordial black holes through novel gravitational wave spectrum, JCAP 07 (2023) 024, [ arXiv:2305.07569]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, Fermion Soliton Stars and Black Holes , Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3678

    1987

  19. [26]

    Del Grosso, G

    L. Del Grosso, G. Franciolini, P. Pani, and A. Urbano, Fermion soliton stars , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 4 044024, [ arXiv:2301.08709]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Xie, Revisiting the fermion-field nontopological solitons , JHEP 09 (2024) 077, [arXiv:2405.01227]

    K.-P. Xie, Revisiting the fermion-field nontopological solitons , JHEP 09 (2024) 077, [arXiv:2405.01227]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Friedberg, T

    R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee, and A. Sirlin, A Class of Scalar-Field Soliton Solutions in Three Space Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2739–2761

    1976

  22. [29]

    S. R. Coleman, Q-balls, Nucl. Phys. B 262 (1985), no. 2 263. [Addendum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 744 (1986)]

    1985

  23. [30]

    T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, Nontopological solitons, Phys. Rept. 221 (1992) 251–350

    1992

  24. [31]

    Pont´ on, Y

    E. Pont´ on, Y. Bai, and B. Jain,Electroweak Symmetric Dark Matter Balls , JHEP 09 (2019) 011, [ arXiv:1906.10739]. 34

    2019 arXiv

  25. [32]

    E. Y. Nugaev and A. V. Shkerin, Review of Nontopological Solitons in Theories with U (1)-Symmetry, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 130 (2020), no. 2 301–320, [ arXiv:1905.05146]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Heeck, A

    J. Heeck, A. Rajaraman, R. Riley, and C. B. Verhaaren, Understanding Q-Balls Beyond the Thin-Wall Limit , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 4 045008, [ arXiv:2009.08462]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Y. Bai, S. Lu, and N. Orlofsky, Q-monopole-ball: a topological and nontopological soliton , JHEP 01 (2022) 109, [ arXiv:2111.10360]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Y. Bai, S. Lu, and N. Orlofsky, Origin of nontopological soliton dark matter: solitosynthesis or phase transition , JHEP 10 (2022) 181, [ arXiv:2208.12290]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Krnjaic and K

    G. Krnjaic and K. Sigurdson, Big Bang Darkleosynthesis , Phys. Lett. B 751 (2015) 464–468, [arXiv:1406.1171]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Bai and A

    Y. Bai and A. J. Long, Six Flavor Quark Matter , JHEP 06 (2018) 072, [arXiv:1804.10249]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Y. Bai, A. J. Long, and S. Lu, Dark Quark Nuggets , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 5 055047, [arXiv:1810.04360]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Liang and A

    X. Liang and A. Zhitnitsky, Axion field and the quark nugget’s formation at the QCD phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 8 083502, [ arXiv:1606.00435]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [40]

    M. B. Wise and Y. Zhang, Stable Bound States of Asymmetric Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 5 055030, [ arXiv:1407.4121]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039907 (2015)]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [41]

    M. B. Wise and Y. Zhang, Yukawa Bound States of a Large Number of Fermions , JHEP 02 (2015) 023, [ arXiv:1411.1772]. [Erratum: JHEP 10, 165 (2015)]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Hardy, R

    E. Hardy, R. Lasenby, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, Big Bang Synthesis of Nuclear Dark Matter , JHEP 06 (2015) 011, [ arXiv:1411.3739]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [43]

    M. I. Gresham, H. K. Lou, and K. M. Zurek, Nuclear Structure of Bound States of Asymmetric Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 9 096012, [ arXiv:1707.02313]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [44]

    M. I. Gresham, H. K. Lou, and K. M. Zurek, Early Universe synthesis of asymmetric dark matter nuggets , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 3 036003, [ arXiv:1707.02316]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Curtin and J

    D. Curtin and J. Setford, How To Discover Mirror Stars , Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020) 135391, [arXiv:1909.04071]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Curtin and J

    D. Curtin and J. Setford, Signatures of Mirror Stars , JHEP 03 (2020) 041, [arXiv:1909.04072]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Kouvaris and N

    C. Kouvaris and N. G. Nielsen, Asymmetric Dark Matter Stars , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 6 063526, [ arXiv:1507.00959]

    2015 arXiv

  41. [48]

    G. F. Giudice, M. McCullough, and A. Urbano, Hunting for Dark Particles with Gravitational Waves, JCAP 10 (2016) 001, [ arXiv:1605.01209]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Maselli, P

    A. Maselli, P. Pnigouras, N. G. Nielsen, C. Kouvaris, and K. D. Kokkotas, Dark stars: gravitational and electromagnetic observables , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 2 023005, [arXiv:1704.07286]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Hippert, J

    M. Hippert, J. Setford, H. Tan, D. Curtin, J. Noronha-Hostler, and N. Yunes, Mirror neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 3 035025, [ arXiv:2103.01965]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Gross, G

    C. Gross, G. Landini, A. Strumia, and D. Teresi, Dark Matter as dark dwarfs and other 35 macroscopic objects: multiverse relics? , JHEP 09 (2021) 033, [ arXiv:2105.02840]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Ryan and D

    M. Ryan and D. Radice, Exotic compact objects: The dark white dwarf , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 11 115034, [ arXiv:2201.05626]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Banks, D

    H. Banks, D. M. Grabowska, and M. McCullough, Gravitational wave backgrounds from colliding exotic compact objects , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 3 035017, [arXiv:2302.07887]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Y. Bai, S. Lu, and N. Orlofsky, Dark exoplanets , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 10 103026, [arXiv:2303.12129]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Nakamura, M

    T. Nakamura, M. Sasaki, T. Tanaka, and K. S. Thorne, Gravitational waves from coalescing black hole MACHO binaries , Astrophys. J. Lett. 487 (1997) L139–L142, [astro-ph/9708060]

    1997 arXiv

  49. [56]

    K. Ioka, T. Chiba, T. Tanaka, and T. Nakamura, Black hole binary formation in the expanding universe: Three body problem approximation , Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 063003, [astro-ph/9807018]

    1998 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 6 061101, [arXiv:1603.08338]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 059901 (2018)]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, E

    Y. Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, E. D. Kovetz, and M. Kamionkowski,Merger rate of primordial black-hole binaries , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 12 123523, [ arXiv:1709.06576]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Raidal, C

    M. Raidal, C. Spethmann, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae,Formation and Evolution of Primordial Black Hole Binaries in the Early Universe , JCAP 02 (2019) 018, [arXiv:1812.01930]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Vaskonen and H

    V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ ae,Lower bound on the primordial black hole merger rate , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 4 043015, [ arXiv:1908.09752]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [61]

    H¨ utsi, M

    G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae,Two populations of LIGO-Virgo black holes , JCAP 03 (2021) 068, [ arXiv:2012.02786]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Krause, H

    D. Krause, H. T. Kloor, and E. Fischbach, Multipole radiation from massive fields: Application to binary pulsar systems , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6892–6906

    1994

  56. [64]

    Croon, A

    D. Croon, A. E. Nelson, C. Sun, D. G. E. Walker, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, Hidden-Sector Spectroscopy with Gravitational Waves from Binary Neutron Stars , Astrophys. J. Lett. 858 (2018), no. 1 L2, [ arXiv:1711.02096]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Alexander, E

    S. Alexander, E. McDonough, R. Sims, and N. Yunes, Hidden-Sector Modifications to Gravitational Waves From Binary Inspirals , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 23 235012, [arXiv:1808.05286]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    J. A. Dror, R. Laha, and T. Opferkuch, Probing muonic forces with neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 2 023005, [ arXiv:1909.12845]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Savastano, L

    S. Savastano, L. Amendola, J. Rubio, and C. Wetterich, Primordial dark matter halos from fifth forces, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 8 083518, [ arXiv:1906.05300]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Bogorad, P

    Z. Bogorad, P. W. Graham, and H. Ramani, Coherent Self-Interactions of Dark Matter 36 in the Bullet Cluster , arXiv:2311.07648

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Rosen, Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities , J

    G. Rosen, Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities , J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 996

    1968

  62. [70]

    K.-M. Lee, J. A. Stein-Schabes, R. Watkins, and L. M. Widrow, Gauged q Balls , Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 1665

    1989

  63. [71]

    I. E. Gulamov, E. Y. Nugaev, A. G. Panin, and M. N. Smolyakov, Some properties of U(1) gauged Q-balls , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 4 045011, [ arXiv:1506.05786]

    2015 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Brihaye, A

    Y. Brihaye, A. Cisterna, B. Hartmann, and G. Luchini, From topological to nontopological solitons: Kinks, domain walls, and Q-balls in a scalar field model with a nontrivial vacuum manifold , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 12 124061, [ arXiv:1511.02757]

    2015 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Heeck, A

    J. Heeck, A. Rajaraman, R. Riley, and C. B. Verhaaren, Mapping Gauged Q-Balls , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 11 116004, [ arXiv:2103.06905]

    2021 arXiv

  66. [74]

    A. L. Macpherson and B. A. Campbell, Biased discrete symmetry breaking and Fermi balls, Phys. Lett. B 347 (1995) 205–210, [ hep-ph/9408387]

    1995 arXiv

  67. [75]

    J.-P. Hong, S. Jung, and K.-P. Xie, Fermi-ball dark matter from a first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 7 075028, [ arXiv:2008.04430]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Bai and N

    Y. Bai and N. Orlofsky, Primordial Extremal Black Holes as Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 5 055006, [ arXiv:1906.04858]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [77]

    P. Lu, K. Kawana, and K.-P. Xie, Old phase remnants in first-order phase transitions , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 12 123503, [ arXiv:2202.03439]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Kawana, P

    K. Kawana, P. Lu, and K.-P. Xie, First-order phase transition and fate of false vacuum remnants, JCAP 10 (2022) 030, [ arXiv:2206.09923]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Niikura et al., Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astron

    H. Niikura et al., Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astron. 3 (2019), no. 6 524–534, [ arXiv:1701.02151]

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Smyth, S

    N. Smyth, S. Profumo, S. English, T. Jeltema, K. McKinnon, and P. Guhathakurta, Updated Constraints on Asteroid-Mass Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 6 063005, [ arXiv:1910.01285]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Griest, A

    K. Griest, A. M. Cieplak, and M. J. Lehner, Experimental Limits on Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter from the First 2 yr of Kepler Data , Astrophys. J. 786 (2014), no. 2 158, [arXiv:1307.5798]

    2014 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Macho Collaboration, R. A. Allsman et al., MACHO project limits on black hole dark matter in the 1-30 solar mass range , Astrophys. J. Lett. 550 (2001) L169, [astro-ph/0011506]

    2001 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Tisserand et al., Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astron

    EROS-2 Collaboration, P. Tisserand et al., Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astron. Astrophys. 469 (2007) 387–404, [ astro-ph/0607207]

    2007 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Wyrzykowski, J

    L. Wyrzykowski, J. Skowron, S. Koz lowski, A. Udalski, M. K. Szyma´ nski, M. Kubiak, G. Pietrzy´ nski, I. Soszy´ nski, O. Szewczyk, K. Ulaczyk, R. Poleski, and P. Tisserand,The ogle view of microlensing towards the magellanic clouds - iv. ogle-iii smc data and final conclusion...

    2011

  77. [85]

    Niikura, M

    H. Niikura, M. Takada, S. Yokoyama, T. Sumi, and S. Masaki, Constraints on Earth-mass primordial black holes from OGLE 5-year microlensing events , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 8 083503, [ arXiv:1901.07120]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Zumalacarregui and U

    M. Zumalacarregui and U. Seljak, Limits on stellar-mass compact objects as dark matter from gravitational lensing of type Ia supernovae , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), no. 14 141101, [arXiv:1712.02240]

    2018 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Oguri, J

    M. Oguri, J. M. Diego, N. Kaiser, P. L. Kelly, and T. Broadhurst, Understanding caustic crossings in giant arcs: characteristic scales, event rates, and constraints on compact dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 2 023518, [ arXiv:1710.00148]

    2018 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Mr´ oz et al.,Limits on planetary-mass primordial black holes from the OGLE high-cadence survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astrophys

    P. Mr´ oz et al.,Limits on planetary-mass primordial black holes from the OGLE high-cadence survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astrophys. J. Lett. 976 (2024) 19, [arXiv:2410.06251]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Croon, D

    D. Croon, D. McKeen, and N. Raj, Gravitational microlensing by dark matter in extended structures, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 8 083013, [ arXiv:2002.08962]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Y. Bai, A. J. Long, and S. Lu, Tests of Dark MACHOs: Lensing, Accretion, and Glow , JCAP 09 (2020) 044, [ arXiv:2003.13182]

    2020 arXiv

  83. [91]

    A. Katz, J. Kopp, S. Sibiryakov, and W. Xue, Femtolensing by Dark Matter Revisited , JCAP 12 (2018) 005, [ arXiv:1807.11495]

    2018 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Bai and N

    Y. Bai and N. Orlofsky, Microlensing of X-ray Pulsars: a Method to Detect Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 12 123019, [ arXiv:1812.01427]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Tamta, N

    M. Tamta, N. Raj, and P. Sharma, Breaking into the window of primordial black hole dark matter with x-ray microlensing , arXiv:2405.20365

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    Jung and T

    S. Jung and T. Kim, Gamma-ray burst lensing parallax: Closing the primordial black hole dark matter mass window , Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020), no. 1 013113, [ arXiv:1908.00078]

    2020 arXiv

  87. [95]

    M. A. Fedderke and S. Sibiryakov, Kicking the Tires on Picolensing as a Probe of Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter , arXiv:2411.12947

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    Ricotti, J

    M. Ricotti, J. P. Ostriker, and K. J. Mack, Effect of Primordial Black Holes on the Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmological Parameter Estimates , Astrophys. J. 680 (2008) 829, [ arXiv:0709.0524]

    2008 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud and M

    Y. Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmic microwave background limits on accreting primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 4 043534, [arXiv:1612.05644]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Poulin, P

    V. Poulin, P. D. Serpico, F. Calore, S. Clesse, and K. Kohri, CMB bounds on disk-accreting massive primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 8 083524, [arXiv:1707.04206]

    2017 arXiv

  91. [99]

    P. D. Serpico, V. Poulin, D. Inman, and K. Kohri, Cosmic microwave background bounds on primordial black holes including dark matter halo accretion , Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020), no. 2 023204, [ arXiv:2002.10771]

    2020 arXiv

  92. [100]

    T. D. Brandt, Constraints on MACHO Dark Matter from Compact Stellar Systems in Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies, Astrophys. J. Lett. 824 (2016), no. 2 L31, [arXiv:1605.03665]. 38

    2016 arXiv

  93. [101]

    S. M. Koushiappas and A. Loeb, Dynamics of Dwarf Galaxies Disfavor Stellar-Mass Black Holes as Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 4 041102, [arXiv:1704.01668]

    2017 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Afshordi, P

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald, and D. N. Spergel, Primordial black holes as dark matter: The Power spectrum and evaporation of early structures , Astrophys. J. Lett. 594 (2003) L71–L74, [astro-ph/0302035]

    2003 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Murgia, G

    R. Murgia, G. Scelfo, M. Viel, and A. Raccanelli, Lyman-α Forest Constraints on Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019), no. 7 071102, [arXiv:1903.10509]

    2019 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Jancovici, On the relativistic degenerate electron gas , Il Nuovo Cimento 25 (1962) 428

    B. Jancovici, On the relativistic degenerate electron gas , Il Nuovo Cimento 25 (1962) 428

    1962

  97. [105]

    Cardoso and L

    V. Cardoso and L. Gualtieri, Testing the black hole ‘no-hair’ hypothesis , Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016), no. 17 174001, [ arXiv:1607.03133]

    2016 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments . Oxford University Press, 10, 2007

    2007

  99. [107]

    F. W. Olver, NIST handbook of mathematical functions hardback and CD-ROM . Cambridge university press, 2010

    2010

  100. [108]

    L´ oczi,Explicit and recursive estimates of the Lambert W function , arXiv e-prints (Aug., 2020) arXiv:2008.06122, [ arXiv:2008.06122]

    L. L´ oczi,Explicit and recursive estimates of the Lambert W function , arXiv e-prints (Aug., 2020) arXiv:2008.06122, [ arXiv:2008.06122]

    2020 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Chen, H.-Y

    M.-C. Chen, H.-Y. Liu, Q.-Y. Zhang, and J. Zhang, Probing massive fields with multiband gravitational-wave observations , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 6 064018, [arXiv:2405.11583]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [110]

    van Die, I

    F. van Die, I. Rapoport, Y. B. Ginat, and V. Desjacques, Detection prospects for the GW background of Galactic (sub)solar mass primordial black holes , arXiv:2410.04522

    arXiv

  103. [111]

    Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [ arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [112]

    C. L. Carilli and S. Rawlings, Science with the Square Kilometer Array: Motivation, key science projects, standards and assumptions , New Astron. Rev. 48 (2004) 979, [astro-ph/0409274]

    2004 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786

    LISA Collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    Corbin and N

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2435–2446, [ gr-qc/0512039]

    2006 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Acernese et al., Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , Class

    VIRGO Collaboration, F. Acernese et al., Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015), no. 2 024001, [arXiv:1408.3978]

    2015 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019), no. 7 035, [arXiv:1907.04833]

    2019 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Schmitz, New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [ arXiv:2002.04615]

    K. Schmitz, New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [ arXiv:2002.04615]. 39

    2021 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Li, M.-X

    F.-Y. Li, M.-X. Tang, and D.-P. Shi, Electromagnetic response of a Gaussian beam to high frequency relic gravitational waves in quintessential inflationary models , Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 104008, [ gr-qc/0306092]

    2003 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Aggarwal et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies , Living Rev

    N. Aggarwal et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies , Living Rev. Rel. 24 (2021), no. 1 4, [ arXiv:2011.12414]

    2021 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Ringwald, J

    A. Ringwald, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, and C. Tamarit,Gravitational Waves as a Big Bang Thermometer, JCAP 03 (2021) 054, [ arXiv:2011.04731]

    2021 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Maharana, and F. Muia, Hunt for light primordial black hole dark matter with ultrahigh-frequency gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 10 103520, [arXiv:2205.02153]

    2022 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Domcke, S

    V. Domcke, S. A. R. Ellis, and N. L. Rodd, Magnets are Weber Bar Gravitational Wave Detectors, arXiv:2408.01483

    arXiv

  115. [123]

    Abazajian et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , arXiv:1907.04473

    K. Abazajian et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , arXiv:1907.04473

    1907 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update , JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [ arXiv:1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update , JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [ arXiv:1910.13125]

    2020 arXiv

  117. [125]

    M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Cosmic strings , Rept. Prog. Phys. 58 (1995) 477–562, [hep-ph/9411342]

    1995 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Anisotropy in the Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Anisotropy in the Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. Lett. 956 (2023), no. 1 L3, [ arXiv:2306.16221]

    2023 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Enoki and M

    M. Enoki and M. Nagashima, The Effect of Orbital Eccentricity on Gravitational Wave Background Radiation from Cosmological Binaries , Prog. Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) 241, [astro-ph/0609377]

    2007 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Center for High Throughput Computing, Center for high throughput computing , 2006. 40

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.