Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

On the New Factorizations of Yang-Mills Amplitudes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tree-level Yang-Mills amplitudes decompose into glued three-point and $(n-1)$-point amplitudes whenever a rectangular block of Mandelstam invariants vanishes, making hidden zeros manifest.

desk verdict Genuine CHY proof of the companion-paper factorization, with a load-bearing but likely fixable gap around invertibility of the g-matrix. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15198 v2 pith:JHLRMGQA submitted 2024-12-19 hep-th

Yong Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords Yang-MillsamplitudeshiddenzerosCHYformalismscatteringequationstree-levelfactorizationBCJrelationsMandelstammatrixgluon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a factorization pattern for tree-level Yang-Mills (YM) amplitudes that was proposed in the companion paper. The central claim is equation (2.2): when the rectangular matrix of Mandelstam invariants $h_m$ vanishes, an $n$-point color-ordered YM amplitude equals a sum over gluon pairs $(i,j)$ of $F_{m,n}(i,j)$, each term being a gluing of a three-point amplitude $A(ij\,-\hat j)$ with an $(n-1)$-point YM amplitude weighted by rational coefficients $X(s,\rho)$. The proof uses the CHY formalism, an integral representation over puncture positions on a sphere, and analyzes the singular solutions of the scattering equations. If the claim is right, the previously conjectured hidden zeros of YM amplitudes become manifest, and higher-point amplitudes can be built recursively from lower-point ones under specific kinematic constraints.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the CHY integral, which represents a YM amplitude as a sum over solutions of the scattering equations $\sum_b s_{ab}/(\sigma_a-\sigma_b)=0$ on a punctured sphere, with a reduced Pfaffian encoding polarizations. Under $h_m=0$ the equations have no regular solutions; the paper classifies the singular ones as $r$-pinch solutions in which up to $\min(m,n-m-2)$ pairs of punctures coincide at order $\tau$. Each $r$-pinch solution induces $(n-r)$-point scattering equations, and the reduced Pfaffian factorizes into three-point amplitudes $A(ij\,-\hat j)$ times an $(n-r)$-point Pfaffian; the PT factor is reduced with the help of BCJ relations, and the identity (8.7) among the resulting t-coefficients cancels all unwanted lower-point integrals.

What would settle it

Evaluate a concrete case, such as the $n=7$, $m=3$ color-ordered YM amplitude with $h_3=0$ and only $x_{1,5}$, $x_{2,6}$ turned on, using an independent numerical method, and compare with $F_{3,7}(1,5)+F_{3,7}(2,6)$ from (2.3).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for $1\le m\le n-3$, once the rectangular block $h_m$ of Mandelstam variables $s_{ab}=k_a\cdot k_b$ with $a\le m$ and $m+2\le b\le n-1$ is set to zero, the tree-level color-ordered YM amplitude $A(I_n)$ satisfies condition (2.2); the right-hand side is a sum over $1\le i\le m$, $m+2\le j\le n-1$ of $F_{m,n}(i,j)$, where each $F_{m,n}(i,j)$ is a three-point amplitude $A(ij\,-\hat j)$ multiplied by a linear combination of $(n-1)$-point YM amplitudes with rational coefficients $X(s,\rho)$ built from Mandelstam variables through BCJ relations. The proof derives this factorization from the CHY formula by showing that all solutions of the scattering equations become singular, classifying them as $r$-pinch configurations, reducing each to induced $(n-r)$-point scattering equations, factorizing the reduced Pfaffian into three-point amplitudes times lower-point Pfaffians, and using the t-coefficient identity (8.7) to cancel every $(n-2)$-point and lower-point CHY integral.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that when the Mandelstam block $h_m$ is scaled by a small parameter $\tau$, every singular solution of the scattering equations consists of pairwise pinches of punctures, with no simultaneous three-puncture pinches; if a singular solution outside this classification exists, the factorization proof would be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The hidden zeros of YM amplitudes are recovered as the special case where the polarization block $\hat H_m$ also vanishes: the right-hand side of (2.2) becomes zero.
  • The factorization yields a recursive construction of higher-point YM amplitudes from three-point and $(n-1)$-point data, with the kinematic coefficients $X(s,\rho)$ fixed by BCJ relations.
  • The result holds for arbitrary subsets of turned-on entries: one entry, whole rows or columns, and general non-aligned configurations all produce sums of the same $F_{m,n}(i,j)$ building blocks.
  • Because the decomposition is an equality on the support of $h_m=0$, it upgrades the hidden-zero statement from a vanishing condition to a complete formula for the amplitude in that kinematic subspace.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension, not pursued by the paper, is to turn the factorization into a practical bootstrap: if the $X(s,\rho)$ coefficients can be generated efficiently, the formula recursively determines all tree-level YM amplitudes from three-point input, offering an alternative to pole-based recursion.
  • The same cancellation mechanism may transfer to gravity amplitudes through the double copy, but the second reduced Pfaffian brings additional structure; testing the analogous decomposition for GR is a concrete next step the paper leaves open.
  • The t-coefficient identity depends only on the $m+1$ punctures, so it may survive as a combinatorial statement in string-theory settings, suggesting the factorization could extend to open-string disk amplitudes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims to prove, within the CHY formalism, the new factorization of tree-level Yang-Mills amplitudes conjectured in the author's companion paper: when the rectangular Mandelstam matrix hm of (2.1) vanishes, the n-point amplitude decomposes into a sum of gluings of a three-point amplitude and linear combinations of (n-1)-point amplitudes, as written in (2.2). The proof proceeds by analyzing singular solutions of the scattering equations under the scaling sab=τ ŝab, showing that only pairwise pinches contribute, reducing the Pfaffian and Parke-Taylor factors to lower-point objects, and introducing coefficients X(s,ρ) defined through the inverse of a matrix g[ρ,π] in (2.5)-(2.6). The paper works out the cases of one, two, three, and then an arbitrary number of entries of the polarization matrix Ĥm turned on, with the key cancellations encoded in identities for t-coefficients, proved in Appendix C and verified by explicit examples for m=2 and m=3.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this would be a significant result: it would give a first-principles CHY derivation of a new recursive structure in Yang-Mills amplitudes, making the hidden zeros of [13] manifest and connecting them to a concrete factorization formula. The manuscript has several strengths: it starts from the standard CHY representation rather than assuming the factorization; it provides explicit m=2 and m=3 examples in Appendices B and C; it includes numerical checks for the coefficients X(s,ρ) up to m=7; and it develops a general combinatorial cancellation scheme that reduces the problem to identities among purely rational functions of Mandelstam invariants. These are concrete, checkable contributions. However, two load-bearing technical steps are not fully proven: the invertibility of the matrix g defining X(s,ρ), and the classification of all singular solutions as pairwise pinches. As they stand, these gaps prevent the argument from being a complete proof for arbitrary multiplicity.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2.2–5.2.3, Eqs. (2.5)–(2.6), (5.28)] The coefficients X(s,ρ) are defined in (2.5) as g^{-1}[ρ,π] times a B-term, where g[ρ,π] is the square matrix in (2.6). The derivation in §5.2.2 solves the linear system (5.28) for X(s,ρ); a unique solution exists only if the matrix g is invertible on the subspace hm=0. The paper does not prove this invertibility. The matrix entries are sums of products of BCJ coefficients B[...|π], which are rational functions of Mandelstam invariants, so det g could vanish on some open region of the hm=0 subspace without any obvious contradiction. If det g=0 on such a region, the right-hand side of (2.2) is ill-defined while the left-hand side is a finite amplitude. The observation in §5.2.3 that X(s,ρ) contains only physical poles up to m=7 is numerical evidence that spurious poles cancel in the sum over ρ, but it does not establish invertibility of g for arbitrary m. Since (2.2) is claimed for all n and all 1≤m≤n−3, this is a load-bearing gap and must be addressed by a proof or a precise condition on the kinematics.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (3.4)] The proof relies on the classification of singular solutions of the scattering equations as containing only pairwise pinches of the form (3.4). The manuscript states 'we claim' that no three punctures pinch simultaneously and cites [30,31,40], but does not give a self-contained proof. This classification is essential: if a triple pinch σa≈σb≈σb′ occurred at leading order, additional terms would appear in the leading scattering equations and the enumeration of contributing solutions underlying every subsequent reduction would be incomplete. The τ-parameterization argument in the text is plausible and consistent with standard CHY lore, but the paper should either provide a complete proof or state this as a precise lemma with a rigorous derivation, since the factorization theorem depends on it.
  3. [Appendix C, Eqs. (8.7), (C.14)–(C.20)] The proof of the key cancellation identity (8.7) contains several steps that are asserted rather than demonstrated. In C.2.5, the text says 'We claim that A vanishes algebraically' and then concludes that the coefficients must vanish without providing the actual computation. In C.2.6, it says 'we assert that X⋆(s,ρv′) = X(s,ρv′)' and 'this follows directly' from the definition, but the identification involves a nontrivial step where the boundary terms in (C.13) are absorbed. The ansatz in C.2.2 for the boundary terms with undetermined functions Z⋆ is introduced without showing that it spans all possible contributions. Since (8.7) is the mechanism that cancels all (n−u)-point CHY integrals for u≥2, these gaps are load-bearing; the proof needs to be completed with explicit algebraic identities, not just assertions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.2.2, sentence after Eq. (5.25)] The text says 'Plugging (5.26) and (5.26) into (5.25)' but the second reference should be (5.27).
  2. [Appendix C.3.2, around Eq. (C.36)] In the sentence after (C.35), the text writes 'subtracting s123PT(123)' but the identity being proved, (C.31), involves s1234PT(1234); this appears to be a typographical error.
  3. [Eq. (2.4) and Eq. (5.30)] The notation s2n in (5.30) is used without definition in the main text; it is later explained in Appendix C.3.2 as −s12−s23−s24 on the support of hm=0, but the reader would benefit from an explicit definition near (5.30).
  4. [Eq. (6.10)] The term −si1i2/σj1j2 in (6.10) is not self-explanatory; the explanation in the following paragraph is helpful but should be moved closer to the equation or made more explicit in the display.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The target factorization is taken from the author's companion paper, but the CHY proof derives it without assuming it; the remaining gaps are rigor gaps, not circular reductions.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: Section 2 states the target (2.2) 'As proposed in [1]' and defines X(s,rho) via (2.5). The proof then proceeds from the CHY integral: Section 3 excludes regular solutions and classifies singular solutions as pairwise pinches; Section 5 factorizes the reduced Pfaffian and reduces the spurious pole by proposing the PT ansatz (5.23), whose coefficients X(s,rho) are solved from the linear system (5.28), not fitted to the amplitude. The expression (2.5) is re-derived from this system rather than imported as an input. The multi-pinch cancellations rest on the t-coefficient identity (8.7), which Appendix C proves from the defining relation (C.5)/(5.23) using a BCJ-basis argument; it is not assumed. No equation in the chain is equivalent to (2.2) by construction: the amplitude factorization is the conclusion of the CHY analysis, not one of its premises. The self-citation to [1] supplies the conjecture and the notation, but it is not load-bearing as evidence. Two genuine gaps do exist but are non-circular: (i) Section 3.2 asserts the pairwise-pinch classification of singular solutions ('we claim that in each singular solution, up to min(m,n-m-2) pairs of punctures may pinch') rather than fully proving it; (ii) Sections 2.5 and 5.2.3 do not prove that g[rho,pi] is invertible on the hm=0 subspace, leaving open a possible spurious-pole issue for X(s,rho), with only numerical evidence up to m=7 reported. These are completeness and well-definedness concerns, not circularity. Because the only circularity-adjacent feature is the same-author companion paper being the source of the conjecture, the score is 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard CHY and BCJ results, plus two paper-specific assumptions: the pairwise-only pinch classification and the invertibility of g[rho,pi]. No free parameters are fitted; X(s,rho) and t-coefficients are determined by algebraic equations.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The CHY formula (2.8) with integrand (2.10) correctly represents tree-level YM amplitudes.
    Used throughout as the starting point; taken from Cachazo-He-Yuan papers [30,31].
  • domain assumption The scattering equations have (n-3)! solutions and the CHY integral localizes to a sum over them (Eq. (2.13)).
    Standard CHY result cited to [30,31].
  • ad hoc to paper In each singular solution, at most pairwise pinches occur; simultaneous three-puncture pinches are inconsistent with the tau-parameterization.
    Stated in Section 3.2 without full derivation; the classification of all singular solutions depends on it.
  • ad hoc to paper The matrix g[rho,pi] in (2.6) is invertible, so the linear system (5.28) uniquely determines X(s,rho).
    The paper solves the system but does not prove invertibility for all m.
  • domain assumption The BCJ relations (2.7) and the boundary-term expansion (C.13) hold for off-shell external legs as used in the proof.
    Relied on heavily in Section 5.2 and Appendix C to fix X(s,rho) and prove identity (8.7); cited to [27,32].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the New Factorizations of Yang-Mills Amplitudes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JHLRMGQA

@misc{pith2026241215198,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the New Factorizations of Yang-Mills Amplitudes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JHLRMGQA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15198}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we prove the new factorization pattern for tree-level Yang-Mills (YM) amplitudes proposed in a companion paper. This pattern reveals a decomposition of amplitudes into a sum of gluings of lower-point amplitudes under specific kinematic constraints, making the hidden zeros of YM amplitudes manifest. Utilizing the Cachazo-He-Yuan (CHY) formalism, we rigorously derive these factorizations by systematically analyzing the contributions of singular solutions to the scattering equations. Through the identification and application of key algebraic identities, we demonstrate how cancellations among terms uncover a recursive structure intricately tied to the hidden zeros. This work not only conclusively validates the proposed factorization but also provides new insights into the geometric and algebraic organization of YM amplitudes within the CHY framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On differential operators for scalar-scaffolded gluons

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Differential operators on scalar-scaffolded variables extract individual phi^3 diagrams from gluon amplitudes, and the independent mixed amplitudes are counted by Catalan numbers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Zhang, New Factorizations of Yang-Mills Amplitudes , arXiv:2406.08969

    Y. Zhang, New Factorizations of Yang-Mills Amplitudes , arXiv:2406.08969

    arXiv

  2. [13]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Hidden zeros for particle/string amplitudes and the unity of colored scalars, pions and gluons , JHEP 10 (2024) 231, [arXiv:2312.16282]. – 48 –

    arXiv 2024

  3. [2]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language , Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298–318

    1977

  4. [3]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Collinear factorization and splitting functions for next-to-next-to-leading order QCD calculations , Phys. Lett. B 446 (1999) 143–152, [hep-ph/9810389]

    arXiv 1999

  5. [4]

    Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory . 3, 2017

    2017

  6. [5]

    Pasterski, M

    S. Pasterski, M. Pate, and A.-M. Raclariu, Celestial Holography, in Snowmass 2021 , 11, 2021. arXiv:2111.11392

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys.Rev

    S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys.Rev. 140 (1965) B516–B524

    work page 1965

  8. [7]

    Strominger and A

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems, JHEP 01 (2016) 086, [ arXiv:1411.5745]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He, and C. Shi, A universal splitting of tree-level string and particle scattering amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B 856 (2024) 138934, [ arXiv:2403.08855]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He, C. Shi, and F. Zhu, On universal splittings of tree-level particle and string scattering amplitudes , JHEP 09 (2024) 049, [ arXiv:2406.03838]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Cachazo, N

    F. Cachazo, N. Early, and B. Gim´ enez Umbert, Smoothly splitting amplitudes and semi-locality , JHEP 08 (2022) 252, [ arXiv:2112.14191]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Gim´ enez Umbert and K

    B. Gim´ enez Umbert and K. Yeats,ϕp amplitudes from the positive tropical Grassmannian: Triangulations of extended diagrams , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 12 125018, [arXiv:2403.17051]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Gim´ enez Umbert and B

    B. Gim´ enez Umbert and B. Sturmfels, Splitting CEGM Amplitudes , arXiv:2501.10805

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    C. R. Mafra, O. Schlotterer, and S. Stieberger, Complete N-Point Superstring Disk Amplitude II. Amplitude and Hypergeometric Function Structure , Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 461–513, [arXiv:1106.2646]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Arkani-Hamed and C

    N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, All-order splits and multi-soft limits for particle and string amplitudes , arXiv:2405.09608

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Scalar-Scaffolded Gluons and the Combinatorial Origins of Yang-Mills Theory , arXiv:2401.00041

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamondon, and H. Thomas, All Loop Scattering as a Counting Problem , arXiv:2309.15913

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamondon, and H. Thomas, All Loop Scattering For All Multiplicity , arXiv:2311.09284

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Nonlinear Sigma model amplitudes to all loop orders are contained in the Tr( Φ3) theory, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 6 065018, [ arXiv:2401.05483]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Arkani-Hamed and C

    N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, Circles and Triangles, the NLSM and Tr( Φ3), arXiv:2403.04826

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Surface Kinematics and ”The” Yang-Mills Integrand, arXiv:2408.11891

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Rodina, Hidden Zeros Are Equivalent to Enhanced Ultraviolet Scaling, and Lead to Unique Amplitudes in Tr( ϕ3) Theory, Phys

    L. Rodina, Hidden Zeros Are Equivalent to Enhanced Ultraviolet Scaling, and Lead to Unique Amplitudes in Tr( ϕ3) Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), no. 3 031601, [ arXiv:2406.04234]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    J. V. Backus and L. Rodina, Emergence of Unitarity and Locality from Hidden Zeros at One-Loop, arXiv:2503.03805

  16. [24]

    Zhou, Understanding zeros and splittings of ordered tree amplitudes via Feynman diagrams , arXiv:2411.07944

    K. Zhou, Understanding zeros and splittings of ordered tree amplitudes via Feynman diagrams , arXiv:2411.07944

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Huang, Y

    H. Huang, Y. Yang, and K. Zhou, Note on hidden zeros and expansions of tree-level amplitudes , arXiv:2502.07173

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Kawai, D

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye, A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings, Nucl. Phys. B269 (1986) 1–23

    1986

  19. [27]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, New relations for gauge-theory amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 085011, [ arXiv:0805.3993]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bartsch, T

    C. Bartsch, T. V. Brown, K. Kampf, U. Oktem, S. Paranjape, and J. Trnka, Hidden Amplitude Zeros From Double Copy , arXiv:2403.10594

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Y. Li, D. Roest, and T. ter Veldhuis, Hidden Zeros in Scaffolded General Relativity and Exceptional Field Theories , arXiv:2403.12939

  22. [30]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions , Phys.Rev.Lett. 113 (2014), no. 17 171601, [ arXiv:1307.2199]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons, JHEP 1407 (2014) 033, [ arXiv:1309.0885]. – 49 –

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, The duality between color and kinematics and its applications , J. Phys. A 57 (2024), no. 33 333002, [ arXiv:1909.01358]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering in Three Dimensions from Rational Maps , JHEP 10 (2013) 141, [ arXiv:1306.2962]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Einstein-Yang-Mills Scattering Amplitudes From Scattering Equations, JHEP 01 (2015) 121, [ arXiv:1409.8256]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM , JHEP 07 (2015) 149, [ arXiv:1412.3479]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Azevedo and O

    T. Azevedo and O. T. Engelund, Ambitwistor formulations of R 2 gravity and (DF) 2 gauge theories, JHEP 11 (2017) 052, [ arXiv:1707.02192]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    He and Y

    S. He and Y. Zhang, New Formulas for Amplitudes from Higher-Dimensional Operators , JHEP 02 (2017) 019, [ arXiv:1608.08448]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cachazo, P

    F. Cachazo, P. Cha, and S. Mizera, Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits , JHEP 06 (2016) 170, [arXiv:1604.03893]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    J. Dong, X. Li, and F. Zhu, Pions from higher-dimensional gluons: general realizations and stringy models, JHEP 07 (2024) 149, [ arXiv:2404.11648]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering equations and Kawai-Lewellen-Tye orthogonality , Phys. Rev. D90 (2014), no. 6 065001, [ arXiv:1306.6575]

    2014 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Early, The CEGM NLSM , arXiv:2502.08016

    N. Early, The CEGM NLSM , arXiv:2502.08016

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Cachazo, N

    F. Cachazo, N. Early, A. Guevara, and S. Mizera, Scattering Equations: From Projective Spaces to Tropical Grassmannians, JHEP 06 (2019) 039, [ arXiv:1903.08904]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Britto, F

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng, and E. Witten, Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory, Phys.Rev.Lett. 94 (2005) 181602, [ hep-th/0501052]

    2005 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Cachazo and N

    F. Cachazo and N. Early, Minimal Kinematics: An All k and n Peek into Trop+G(k, n), SIGMA 17 (2021) 078, [ arXiv:2003.07958]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Early, Generalized permutohedra in the kinematic space , JHEP 06 (2024) 072, [arXiv:1804.05460]

    N. Early, Generalized permutohedra in the kinematic space , JHEP 06 (2024) 072, [arXiv:1804.05460]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Early, A

    N. Early, A. Pfister, and B. Sturmfels, Minimal Kinematics on M0,n, arXiv:2402.03065

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Broedel and L

    J. Broedel and L. J. Dixon, Color-kinematics duality and double-copy construction for amplitudes from higher-dimension operators , JHEP 10 (2012) 091, [ arXiv:1208.0876]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    L. M. Garozzo, L. Queimada, and O. Schlotterer, Berends-Giele currents in Bern-Carrasco-Johansson gauge for F 3- and F 4-deformed Yang-Mills amplitudes , JHEP 02 (2019) 078, [ arXiv:1809.08103]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Azevedo, M

    T. Azevedo, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and O. Schlotterer, Heterotic and bosonic string amplitudes via field theory , JHEP 10 (2018) 012, [ arXiv:1803.05452]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S. He, F. Teng, and Y. Zhang, String amplitudes from field-theory amplitudes and vice versa , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019), no. 21 211603, [ arXiv:1812.03369]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    C. R. Mafra, O. Schlotterer, and S. Stieberger, Complete N-Point Superstring Disk Amplitude I. Pure Spinor Computation , Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 419–460, [ arXiv:1106.2645]. – 50 –

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Stieberger, Open & Closed vs

    S. Stieberger, Open & Closed vs. Pure Open String Disk Amplitudes , arXiv:0907.2211

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. He, F. Teng, and Y. Zhang, String Correlators: Recursive Expansion, Integration-by-Parts and Scattering Equations , JHEP 09 (2019) 085, [ arXiv:1907.06041]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Geyer, L

    Y. Geyer, L. Mason, R. Monteiro, and P. Tourkine, Loop Integrands for Scattering Amplitudes from the Riemann Sphere , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), no. 12 121603, [ arXiv:1507.00321]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Geyer, L

    Y. Geyer, L. Mason, R. Monteiro, and P. Tourkine, One-loop amplitudes on the Riemann sphere, JHEP 03 (2016) 114, [ arXiv:1511.06315]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, One-Loop Corrections from Higher Dimensional Tree Amplitudes, JHEP 08 (2016) 008, [ arXiv:1512.05001]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Geyer, L

    Y. Geyer, L. Mason, R. Monteiro, and P. Tourkine, Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes from the Riemann Sphere, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 12 125029, [ arXiv:1607.08887]

    2016 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Geyer, R

    Y. Geyer, R. Monteiro, and R. Stark-Much˜ ao, Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes: Double-Forward Limit and Colour-Kinematics Duality , JHEP 12 (2019) 049, [arXiv:1908.05221]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Geyer and L

    Y. Geyer and L. Mason, The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 6: Ambitwistor Strings and Amplitudes from the Worldsheet , J. Phys. A 55 (2022), no. 44 443007, [arXiv:2203.13017]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    S. He, O. Schlotterer, and Y. Zhang, New BCJ representations for one-loop amplitudes in gauge theories and gravity , Nucl. Phys. B930 (2018) 328–383, [ arXiv:1706.00640]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [61]

    B. Feng, S. He, Y. Zhang, and Y.-Q. Zhang, One-loop diagrams with quadratic propagators from the worldsheet, JHEP 08 (2022) 240, [ arXiv:2204.13659]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Dong, Y.-Q

    J. Dong, Y.-Q. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, One-loop Bern-Carrasco-Johansson numerators on quadratic propagators from the worldsheet , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 10 L101905, [arXiv:2312.01580]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    S. De, A. Pokraka, M. Skowronek, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, Surfaceology for colored Yukawa theory, JHEP 09 (2024) 160, [ arXiv:2406.04411]. – 51 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.