Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 16 references

Surface Modification and Subsequent Fermi Density Enhancement of Bi(111)

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Argon bombardment of Bi(111) creates monolayer steps and type-A bilayer step edges whose higher Fermi-level density accounts for a factor-of-3 rise in photoemission intensity near the Fermi level.

desk verdict Solid experimental observation on sputtered Bi(111), with a mechanistic explanation that needs spin-orbit-inclusive DFT to fully land. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15313 v1 pith:NAM2E2MV submitted 2024-12-19 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-ph

Kuanysh Zhussupbekov , Killian Walshe , Brian Walls , Andrei Ionov , Sergei I. Bozhko , Andrei Ksenz , Rais N. Mozhchil , Ainur Zhussupbekova
show 5 more authors
Karsten Fleischer Samuel Berman Ivan Zhilyaev David D. O'Regan Igor V. Shvets
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-ph PACS 79.60.-i68.37.Ef71.15.Mb
keywords Bi(111)bismuthsurfaceionbombardmentFermi-leveldensityofstatesmonolayerstepsultravioletphotoelectronspectroscopyscanningtunnelingmicroscopyfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to explain why argon-ion bombardment of a cleaved bismuth Bi(111) surface makes the surface behave as if it has more electrons available at the Fermi level. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) shows that after Ar+ sputtering the surface recrystallizes into ordered nanoislands containing monolayer steps and both types of bilayer step edges, even at 110 K, while ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) shows the density of states near the Fermi level grows by roughly a factor of three. The authors argue that the newly exposed monolayer terraces and type-A zigzag step edges, not the more common type-B edges, carry the extra Fermi-level density: locally breaking the Peierls distortion that normally gives bismuth its layered structure exposes covalent-like layers with a higher density of states. The claim matters because it identifies ion processing as a way to engineer the metallic character of a bismuth surface, and it connects the effect to the same physics that gives bismuth its topological edge states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the local breaking of bismuth's Peierls transition, the lattice distortion that makes Bi(111) form alternating covalent and van der Waals layers. When argon ions break covalent and van der Waals bonds with roughly equal probability, the surface develops monolayer steps whose atoms relax toward each other; these regions, together with type-A zigzag bilayer edges (which terminate at the top atom of a bilayer, unlike type-B armchair edges at the bottom), show a substantially higher Fermi-level density in the DFT calculations. To make the comparison quantitative, each atom's contribution to the Fermi-level density is extracted from the calculated electronic states via atomic-orbital projections, giving a per-atom ranking that the authors compare with the measured photoemission intensity.

What would settle it

Compute the same monolayer, type-A, and type-B step geometries with spin-orbit coupling included and compare their Fermi-level densities; if monolayers and type-A edges no longer outrank the bilayer terrace, the proposed explanation for the factor-of-3 UPS increase is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that argon-ion bombardment of Bi(111) raises the surface Fermi-level density of states by introducing specific two-dimensional defects: monolayer steps and type-A bilayer step edges. In the authors' density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the monolayer terraces and type-A edges have a density of states at the Fermi level roughly two to three times larger than that of the bilayer terraces and type-B edges that dominate a freshly cleaved surface, which matches the factor-of-3 rise in ultraviolet photoemission intensity after sputtering. The paper rules out contamination, argon retention, work-function shifts, and amorphous disorder as the origin of the increase, and it concludes that the effect arises from locally breaking the Peierls transition: monolayer regions relax toward covalent interlayer spacing and thereby gain metallic-like states.

Load-bearing premise

The explanation assumes that the ordering of step types by Fermi-level density—monolayer and type-A edges above type-B edges and terraces—survives once spin-orbit coupling is included, because the calculations were done without it even though spin-orbit effects in bismuth are comparable in size to the Peierls distortion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within two minutes of Ar+ etching, the near-Fermi UPS intensity rises by roughly a factor of three and then saturates, so the effect is quick and self-limiting on this surface.
  • The sputtered surface keeps a well-ordered LEED pattern at both 300 K and 110 K, so recrystallization competes with ion-induced amorphization even at low temperature.
  • Monolayer steps, which are energetically unfavorable on an ideal cleaved surface, can be created by sputtering and remain stable in UHV, making them accessible to further study.
  • Because type-A bilayer edges are the same edges already known to host one-dimensional topological states, the measured Fermi-density increase is partly a consequence of increasing the density of topological edge states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension of the paper's argument: the scalar-relativistic DFT omits spin-orbit coupling, yet the paper itself notes spin-orbit energy is comparable to the Peierls distortion scale; a spin-orbit-inclusive calculation of the same step geometries would test whether the Fermi-density ordering survives.
  • A second extension: atomic-resolution STS on the sputtered surface with improved tip stability could spatially resolve monolayer-step and type-A-edge contributions rather than leaving them as an inference from the UPS average.
  • A third extension: a finer sputter-dose series than the 2, 7, and 12 minute points would reveal whether the threefold UPS increase tracks monolayer-step density or type-A edge density, distinguishing the two proposed sources experimentally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and theoretical study of Ar+ ion bombardment on Bi(111). Using STM, STS, LEED, XPS, and UPS, the authors observe that sputtering produces monolayer steps and type-A bilayer step edges, along with an approximately factor-of-3 increase in UPS intensity near the Fermi level. DFT calculations with a scalar-relativistic PBE functional predict that monolayer terraces and type-A step edges have higher Fermi-level density of states than bilayer terraces and type-B edges, leading the authors to propose these defects as the origin of the Fermi-density enhancement. The paper combines a broad set of surface-science measurements with first-principles modeling and presents a cancellation argument to argue that the monolayer contribution outweighs the negative contribution from type-B edges.

Significance. If the findings are robust, the work demonstrates a simple ion-bombardment route to enhanced surface Fermi density in Bi(111), which is relevant for thermoelectric and spintronic applications. The experimental dataset is comprehensive, combining structural, electronic, and chemical characterization, and the DFT calculations are parameter-free in the sense that they are not fitted to the UPS data. The predicted ordering of Fermi density among step types is falsifiable and is compared qualitatively with STS and UPS. The main weaknesses are that the DFT neglects spin-orbit coupling, which the paper itself identifies as important in bismuth, and that the experimental quantification of the UPS increase and the step-height assignments lack detailed uncertainty analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Computational Details and Introduction] The DFT calculations use a scalar-relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotential and the PBE functional, while the Introduction states that spin-orbit interaction (SOI) plays a significant role in forming the bismuth electron spectrum and that its energy is comparable to the Peierls instability scale. The type-A bilayer edge states are known 1D topological edge states whose existence and Fermi-level weight depend on SOC. Consequently, the predicted enhancement at the type-A edge in Figure 6(a) may be an artifact of neglecting SOC, or the enhancement may be misplaced or underestimated. A fully relativistic calculation is needed to confirm that the type-A edge and monolayer step indeed have the highest Fermi density among the surface defects; without such a calculation, the proposed mechanism for the UPS increase is not fully supported.
  2. [Surface of Bi(111) after Argon Bombardment, Figure 5] The step-height histogram in Figure 5 assigns the 2.7 Å peak to a monolayer step, but the theoretical interlayer spacings in Bi(111) are 1.59 Å and 2.34 Å. The paper attributes the discrepancy to surface relaxation and a distinct LDOS affecting the STM tip-surface distance, but this assignment is not independently calibrated, and the histogram does not show the 1.6 Å spacing that would correspond to the covalent interlayer distance. Because this histogram is the basis for the estimate that monolayer terraces comprise approximately 25% of the surface, and that estimate feeds into the cancellation argument for the Fermi-density increase, the uncertainty in the step-height assignment propagates into the central interpretation.
  3. [Results, UPS measurements, Figure 3(e)] The factor-of-3 increase in UPS intensity near the Fermi level following 2 minutes of Ar+ etching is reported without error bars, repeated measurements, or a discussion of normalization and possible beam-induced effects. Since this experimental observation is the primary evidence for the central claim of Fermi-density enhancement, a quantitative uncertainty estimate and at least one independent repetition are needed to establish that the increase is robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 4 and Figure 5] The text reports line-profile step heights of approximately 1.35 and 1.75 Å as corresponding to a monolayer, while the histogram assigns 2.7 Å to monolayer steps; the reconciliation of these values should be stated more explicitly.
  2. [Computational Details] The k-point sampling description is internally contradictory: it first states a converged density equivalent to 15×15×4 for the six-atom unit cell, then says 1 k-point is used in both the out-of-plane direction and the in-plane Bi[1-10] direction, with 15 in the other in-plane direction; please clarify the actual sampling.
  3. [Figure 6 caption] The caption mentions 'nine simulated atomically thin layers under the surfaces' while the Computational Details describe a slab of 10 layers (5 bilayers); please reconcile this discrepancy.
  4. [Introduction] The statement that the energy of the SOI is comparable with the energy scales of the Peierls instability is important but is not directly supported by the cited reference; please provide a more specific citation or quantitative comparison.
  5. [Results, DFT section] The term 'Fermi density' is used throughout for the LDOS at the Fermi level; it would help to define this term at first use and to specify how the Löwdin population analysis is used to obtain per-atom Fermi densities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DFT Fermi-density ordering is an independent first-principles prediction, and the UPS factor-of-3 increase is a separate measurement; the omitted spin-orbit coupling is an accuracy concern, not a circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central claim is that Ar+ bombardment creates monolayer steps and type-A bilayer step edges, and that these defects raise the surface Fermi density, observed as a factor-of-3 UPS increase near the Fermi level. The two pillars are independent: UPS is a direct measurement ('UPS measurements indicate that the DOS near the Fermi level increases as the surface is bombarded... approximately by a factor of 3'), while the DFT calculations are first-principles simulations of slab models with stated inputs (a scalar-relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotential and the PBE functional) and no fitted parameters taken from the UPS data. The DFT Fermi-density ordering (monolayer and type-A edge higher than terrace and type-B edge) is computed via Lowdin population analysis and then compared qualitatively with experiment; it is not constructed from the experimental result. The back-of-envelope cancellation argument (using the STM-derived ~25% monolayer coverage and DFT per-atom LDOS increments) is a consistency check, not a derivation of the measured increase. The paper's self-citations (refs 43, 51, 52, 59) are methodological or related-material references and do not carry the load of the central claim; the type-A topological edge-state attribution relies on external works (Drozdov et al., Schindler et al.). The neglect of spin-orbit coupling is explicitly disclosed in the Computational Details, and the paper itself notes that SOI is energetically comparable to the Peierls distortion in Bi; this is a legitimate accuracy/robustness concern, but it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no empirical result is repackaged as a first-principles outcome. The theoretical ordering could in principle be wrong if SOC reverses it, but that would be an error in an independent calculation, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The interpretation leans on several domain assumptions, the most important being the neglect of spin-orbit coupling in DFT and the hand-assigned monolayer step height. No new physical entities are proposed.

free parameters (1)
  • Monolayer step height assignment in histogram = 2.7 Å
    The 4 Å and 2.7 Å peaks in the step-height histogram are assigned to bilayer and monolayer steps. The 2.7 Å value is chosen by hand to support the ~25% monolayer coverage estimate used in the Fermi-density cancellation argument, even though the theoretical monolayer spacing is 1.6-2.4 Å.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit coupling is negligible for the step-type Fermi-density ordering.
    The DFT uses a scalar-relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotential, omitting SOI. The paper states SOI energy is comparable to Peierls energy scales, so this omission could affect the predicted ordering of Fermi density across step types.
  • domain assumption The slab and partial-layer geometry is converged for Fermi density.
    The paper checks bond-length convergence between 7- and 17-atom step widths but does not directly check convergence of Fermi density with slab width or thickness.
  • domain assumption Löwdin-population LDOS at the Fermi level is proportional to UPS intensity.
    UPS intensity depends on photoemission cross-sections and matrix elements, not only on the Kohn-Sham DOS. The paper assumes a qualitative proportionality.
  • domain assumption LEED after sputtering indicates surface recrystallization rather than diffraction from undisturbed subsurface layers.
    The authors argue the electron mean free path limits the probed depth to about 5 Å, but this is an indirect inference.
  • ad hoc to paper Each surface atom contributes its per-atom LDOS throughout an equal unit volume in the cancellation estimate.
    This simplifying assumption in the Results section lets the authors compare monolayer and type-B edge contributions arithmetically, but it is not derived from experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Surface Modification and Subsequent Fermi Density Enhancement of Bi(111)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NAM2E2MV

@misc{pith2026241215313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Surface Modification and Subsequent Fermi Density Enhancement of Bi(111)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NAM2E2MV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15313}
}
read the original abstract

Defects introduced to the surface of Bi(111) break the translational symmetry and modify the surface states locally. We present a theoretical and experimental study of the 2D defects on the surface of Bi(111) and the states that they induce. Bi crystals cleaved in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) at low temperature (110 K) and the resulting ion-etched surface are investigated by low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) as well as spectroscopy (STS) techniques in combination with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. STS measurements of cleaved Bi(111) reveal that a commonly observed bilayer step edge has a lower density of states (DOS) around the Fermi level as compared to the atomic-flat terrace. Following ion bombardment, the Bi(111) surface reveals anomalous behavior at both 110 and 300 K: Surface periodicity is observed by LEED, and a significant increase in the number of bilayer step edges and energetically unfavorable monolayer steps is observed by STM. It is suggested that the newly exposed monolayer steps and the type A bilayer step edges result in an increase to the surface Fermi density as evidenced by UPS measurements and the Kohn-Sham DOS. These states appear to be thermodynamically stable under UHV conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. STM, LEED, and XPS of the cleaved Bi(111) surface. (a) Large-scale STM images of Bi(111) surface cleaved in situ at 110 K in UHV (150 × 150 nm2 , V = 0.4 V and I = 670 pA). Panels (b) and (c) illustrate the atomic resolution of the terrace in image (a). Scale and scanning parameters for (b) and (c) are 20 × 20 nm2 , V = 2 V, I = 80 pA and 4.5 × 4.5 nm2 , V = 2 V, I = 80 pA, respectively. (d) LEED image of the cleave… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. STS investigation of band profile across the double bilayer step of Bi(111). (a) Large-scale STM image (150 × 150 nm2 , V = 1.2 V, and I = 70 pA). (b) STM image of the green square labeled in (a) (30 × 30 nm2 , V = 1.0 V, and I = 80 pA). The blue line (15 nm) indicates where the line spectroscopy has been performed (stabilization parameters V = 1.2 V and I = 70 pA). (c) Representative dI/dV spectra measured on and a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. LEED and UPS spectra of the Bi(111) surface following Ar+ etching. (a) LEED pattern was obtained from the cleaved surface of Bi(111) at room temperature at Ep = 57 eV. (b) LEED after the 10 min of sputtering at room temperature and at Ep = 57 eV (E = 2 keV, PAr =5 × 10−5 mbar, and I = 20 μA). (c) LEED of the cleaved crystal at 110 K and at E = 95 eV. (d) LEED of the sputtered surface at 110 K for 12 min (E =2 keV, P… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a (200 × 200 nm2 , V = 1.5 V, and I = 70 pA) which displays pseudohexagonal structures (nanoislands) with preferential edges (indicated with dashed, blue lines) corresponding to the 6-fold symmetry of Bi(111). Drozdov et al.8 have shown that hexagonal “pits” in Bi(111)…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Histogram of step heights following Ar+ sputtering. (a) Deconvolved step heights of the sputtered surface shown in (b); step heights corresponding to monolayer steps (≈2.7 Å) are indicted by red arrows. (b) STM image after Ar+ sputtering at room temperature with partia…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated Fermi density (LDOS at the Fermi level) of monolayer and bilayer steps on Bi(111): (a) Fermi density of surface atoms from bilayer (blue) and monolayer (red) step structures ((b) and (c), respectively), calculated by using Löwdin population analysis.61 The l…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a displays the atom-averaged DOS within a ±2 eV window centered on the Fermi level for the three central surface atoms (shown in Figure 6b,c) of the bilayer and monolayer steps. Two distinct DOS curves are evident, with the monolayer step (orange) having a larger DOS i…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bozhko, Andrei Ksenz, Rais N

    Surface Modi fication and Subsequent Fermi Density Enhancement of Bi(111) Kuanysh Zhussupbekov, * Killian Walshe, Brian Walls, Andrei Ionov, Sergei I. Bozhko, Andrei Ksenz, Rais N. Mozhchil, Ainur Zhussupbekova, Karsten Fleischer, Samuel Berman, Ivan Zhilyaev, David D. O ’Regan,* and Igor V. Shvets * Cite This: J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 5549 −5558 Read O...

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    (a) Large-scale STM image (150 × 150 nm2, V = 1.2 V, and I = 70 pA)

    STS investigation of band pro file across the double bilayer step of Bi(111). (a) Large-scale STM image (150 × 150 nm2, V = 1.2 V, and I = 70 pA). (b) STM image of the green square labeled in (a) (30 × 30 nm2, V = 1.0 V, and I = 80 pA). The blue line (15 nm) indicates where the line spectroscopy has been performed (stabilization parameters V = 1.2 V and I ...

  3. [3]

    (a) Large-scale STM images of Bi(111) surface cleaved in situ at 110 K in UHV (150 × 150 nm 2, V = 0.4 V and I = 670 pA)

    STM, LEED, and XPS of the cleaved Bi(111) surface. (a) Large-scale STM images of Bi(111) surface cleaved in situ at 110 K in UHV (150 × 150 nm 2, V = 0.4 V and I = 670 pA). Panels (b) and (c) illustrate the atomic resolution of the terrace in image (a). Scale and scanning parameters for (b) and (c) are 20 × 20 nm2, V =2V , I = 80 pA and 4.5 × 4.5 nm2, V =...

  4. [5]

    (a) LEED pattern was obtained from the cleaved surface of Bi(111) at room temperature at Ep = 57 eV

    LEED and UPS spectra of the Bi(111) surface following Ar + etching. (a) LEED pattern was obtained from the cleaved surface of Bi(111) at room temperature at Ep = 57 eV. (b) LEED after the 10 min of sputtering at room temperature and at Ep =5 7e V( E = 2 keV, PAr =5 × 10−5 mbar, and I =2 0 μA). (c) LEED of the cleaved crystal at 110 K and at E = 95 eV. (d)...

  5. [6]

    (a) Deconvolved step heights of the sputtered surface shown in (b); step heights corresponding to monolayer steps ( ≈2.7 Å) are indicted by red arrows

    Histogram of step heights following Ar + sputtering. (a) Deconvolved step heights of the sputtered surface shown in (b); step heights corresponding to monolayer steps ( ≈2.7 Å) are indicted by red arrows. (b) STM image after Ar + sputtering at room temperature with partial pressure PAr =5 × 10−5 mbar for 10 min. Scale and scanning parameters of the image ...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.0

  6. [7]

    61 The line for the monolayer section of the monolayer step structure is solid, while the remaining bilayer component is broken

    Simulated Fermi density (LDOS at the Fermi level) of monolayer and bilayer steps on Bi(111): (a) Fermi density of surface atoms from bilayer (blue) and monolayer (red) step structures ((b) and (c), respectively), calculated by using Lo ̈wdin population analysis. 61 The line for the monolayer section of the monolayer step structure is solid, while the rema...

  7. [14]

    A.; Hall, J.; Rosch, A.; Krasheninnikov, A

    (44) Murray, C.; van Efferen, C.; Jolie, W.; Fischer, J. A.; Hall, J.; Rosch, A.; Krasheninnikov, A. V.; Komsa, H.-P.; Michely, T. Band Bending and Valence Band Quantization at Line Defects in MoS2. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 9176 −9187. (45) Chaika, A. N.; Orlova, N. N.; Semenov, V. N.; Postnova, E. Y.; Krasnikov, S. A.; Lazarev, M. G.; Chekmazov, S. V.; Aristov...

    work page 2020

  8. [111]

    higher order

    direction are d1 = 1.59 Å and d2 = 2.34 Å. 34,35 It has been shown in numerous experiments that Bi single crystals cleave along the (111) plane, breaking the van der Waals bonds between bilayers. 7,8,25,36 One of the first studies of cleaved Bi(111) by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) was conducted by Edelman et al.36 They observed a new type of defect ...

    2020

Show all 16 references
  1. [120]

    C.; Bobisch, C

    (37) Cottin, M. C.; Bobisch, C. A.; Schaffert, J.; Jnawali, G.; Bihlmayer, G.; Möller, R. Interplay between Forward and Backward Scattering of Spin −Orbit Split Surface States of Bi(111). Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2717 −2722. (38) Lu, Y.; Xu, W.; Zeng, M.; Yao, G.; Shen, L.; Yang, ...

    2013

  2. [138]

    H.; Meier, F.; Osterwalder, J.; Patthey, L.; Checkelsky, J

    (14) Hsieh, D.; Xia, Y.; Qian, D.; Wray, L.; Dil, J. H.; Meier, F.; Osterwalder, J.; Patthey, L.; Checkelsky, J. G.; Ong, N. P.; et al. A tunable topological insulator in the spin helical Dirac transport regime. Nature 2009, 460, 1101 −1105. (15) Fu, L.; Kane, C. L.; Mele, E. ...

    2009

  3. [510]

    Scanning tunneling spectroscopy studies of topological materials

    (21) Lin, C.-L.; Kawakami, N.; Arafune, R.; Minamitani, E.; Takagi, N. Scanning tunneling spectroscopy studies of topological materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2020, 32, 243001. (22) Sahoo, M. P. K.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Nanoscale magnetism and novel electronic properties of...

    2020

  4. [669]

    W.; Jin, K.-H.; Jhi, S.-H

    (9) Yeom, H. W.; Jin, K.-H.; Jhi, S.-H. Topological fate of edge states of single Bi bilayer on Bi(111). Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 93, 075435. (10) Peng, L.; Xian, J.-J.; Tang, P.; Rubio, A.; Zhang, S.-C.; Zhang, W.; Fu, Y.-S. Visualizing topological edg...

    2016

  5. [924]

    K.; Alexandradinata, A.; Jeon, S.; Nadj-Perge, S.; Ji, H.; Cava, R

    (8) Drozdov, I. K.; Alexandradinata, A.; Jeon, S.; Nadj-Perge, S.; Ji, H.; Cava, R. J.; Bernevig, B. A.; Yazdani, A. One-dimensional topological edge states of bismuth bilayers. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 664−

    2014

  6. [1955]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C pubs.acs.org/JPCC Article https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07345 J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 5549 −5558 5557 (32) Applications of the Bloch theory to the study of alloys and of the properties of bismuth. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A: Ma...

    2021 doi

  7. [3742]

    L.; Cococcioni, M.; Dabo, I.; et al

    (46) Giannozzi, P.; Baroni, S.; Bonini, N.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Chiarotti, G. L.; Cococcioni, M.; Dabo, I.; et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2009,...

    2009

  8. [3794]

    Nontrivial evolution of the Sb(111) electronic and atomic structure after ion irradiation

    (53) Chekmazov, S.; Smirnov, A.; Ksenz, A.; Bozhko, S.; Ionov, A.; Protasova, S.; Kapustin, A.; Vilkov, O.; Levchenko, E. Nontrivial evolution of the Sb(111) electronic and atomic structure after ion irradiation. Mater. Lett. 2019, 240,6 9 −72. (54) Yakovkin, I. Dependence of ...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.