Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Scattering-Based Structural Inversion of Soft Materials via Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Kolmogorov-Arnold network trained on computed scattering curves can invert measured small-angle scattering data into real-space structural parameters without closed-form analytical models.

desk verdict A useful KAN surrogate for SAS fitting, with a strong colloid demo and a weaker lamellar half; the 'model-independent' claim overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15474 v1 pith:RD5ZGFRS submitted 2024-12-20 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chi-Huan Tung , Lijie Ding , Ming-Ching Chang , Guan-Rong Huang , Lionel Porcar , Yangyang Wang , Jan-Michael Y. Carrillo , Bobby G. Sumpter
show 3 more authors
Yuya Shinohara Changwoo Do Wei-Ren Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords small-angleneutronscatteringKolmogorov-Arnoldnetworkstructuralinversionlamellarphasescolloidalsuspensionsmachinelearningstructurefactoreffectiveinteractionpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) can serve as a continuous, differentiable surrogate scattering function for small-angle scattering data, allowing the inverse problem—recovering real-space structure from reciprocal-space intensity—to be solved by ordinary least-squares fitting without a closed-form analytical model. The authors argue this matters because many soft-matter systems, such as defective lamellar phases, have no tractable analytical scattering function, and because earlier convolutional-network approaches require evenly spaced $Q$ grids that real instruments rarely supply. They demonstrate the idea on two systems: lyotropic lamellar phases, where the KAN recovers three structural parameters that render the layer topology, and charged colloidal suspensions, where the KAN maps the measured structure factor to an effective screened-Coulomb interaction potential. If the demonstrations hold, a trained KAN becomes a reusable model library for scattering analysis, and the same recipe should transfer to other soft-matter systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the KAN itself, built on the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem, which writes a multivariate function as sums of univariate spline functions. Two stacked KAN blocks separate physical parameters from $Q$: the first maps parameters to latent variables, the second combines those latent variables with $Q$ to emit a continuous $I(Q)$, so no fixed $Q$ grid is needed. A second device is reference-system standardization: the lamellar network learns the ratio $I(Q)/I_{\mathrm{ref}}(Q)$ against a linear baseline, and the colloidal network learns deviations from the analytic hard-sphere structure factor, which concentrates the network's capacity on small corrections and improves numerical stability.

What would settle it

Take a lamellar sample whose real-space defect structure has been determined independently by electron microscopy, compute the KAN-inferred $(\sigma_k, \Gamma, \alpha)$ from its SANS curve, and check whether the reconstructed three-dimensional structure reproduces the observed layer connectivity and defect distribution; if it does not, the three-parameter representation is insufficient for structural inversion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central claim is that a two-stage KAN can learn the mapping from structural parameters and wave vector $Q$ to scattering intensity $I(Q)$ well enough that the trained network, inserted into a least-squares fitting loop, returns physically meaningful parameters from experimental data. For defective lamellar phases, the network takes $(\sigma_k, \Gamma, \alpha)$—the wave-vector spread, symmetry ordering, and amphiphile-to-water volume ratio—and outputs $\ln I(Q\tilde d)$; the fitted values reproduce the measured SANS curves and, when fed back into the wave-field representation, show a concentration-driven evolution from isolated anisotropic plates to connected, more isotropic structures. For charged colloids, the network takes $(\varphi, 1/(\kappa D), \ln A, QD)$ and outputs corrections to a hard-sphere reference structure factor; the resulting $S(Q)$ matches molecular-dynamics test sets, and fitting experimental data from silica dispersions yields effective interaction potentials whose repulsive strength grows with concentration.

Load-bearing premise

The lamellar half of the paper stands on the assumption, taken from earlier work, that every defective lamellar structure encountered in the experiments is uniquely captured by the three parameters $(\sigma_k, \Gamma, \alpha)$ used to build the training library; if that wave-field representation is wrong or incomplete, the fitted numbers will have no direct real-space meaning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A trained KAN can fit SANS data recorded at arbitrary, unevenly spaced $Q$ values without rebinning or interpolation, so one network can analyze data from different instruments and configurations.
  • Because the KAN is differentiable in its input parameters, standard gradient-based least-squares minimizers can be used for fitting, which is not practical for activation-heavy convolutional networks.
  • For defective lamellar phases, the extracted $(\sigma_k, \Gamma, \alpha)$ parameters yield three-dimensional structures, so scattering alone can visualize the transition from ordered lamellae toward sponge-like, interconnected phases.
  • For charged colloids, the KAN replaces approximate closure relations used in integral-equation inversion, extending feasible analysis to concentrated or strongly coupled regimes where those closures fail to converge.
  • The same surrogate-plus-least-squares recipe should apply to other scattering problems, as long as a reference system and a sufficiently representative training library can be constructed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method's independence from closed-form scattering expressions does not make it independent of the physical assumptions built into the training library; the inversion inherits those assumptions through the simulated or modeled training data.
  • The fitted parameters carry no built-in uncertainty estimate, so a natural extension is to attach one, for example by training an ensemble of KANs or adding synthetic noise.
  • The continuous-$Q$ property suggests the framework can be applied to time-resolved or scanning scattering experiments where the $Q$ grid changes between frames, without the data preprocessing that grid-based networks require.
  • One could test the scheme's limits by generating scattering curves from structures outside the training library and checking whether fitting recovers a plausible parameter set or silently returns an in-distribution compromise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) framework for small-angle scattering inversion: a continuous, differentiable surrogate I(Q;\lambda) that can be used in least-squares fitting of experimental SANS data at arbitrary Q points. Two applications are presented: defective lamellar phases, where the KAN maps (\sigma_k, \Gamma, \alpha) to the scattering intensity, and charged colloidal suspensions, where the KAN maps (\phi, 1/\kappa D, \ln A, QD) to the direct correlation function relative to a hard-sphere reference. The authors fit experimental AOT SANS data and silica colloidal SANS data, and benchmark the colloidal S(Q) against an MD test set.

Significance. If validated, the KAN approach would be a useful addition to the SAS analysis toolbox because it provides continuous, differentiable scattering functions that avoid fixed-Q grids and can support gradient-based minimization. The colloid case is the stronger part: the KAN reproduces an independent MD test set across \phi from 0.045 to 0.405, and the hard-sphere-referenced formulation is a sensible way to reduce the learning target. The lamellar case is weaker: the experimental fits show acknowledged low-Q discrepancies and no reported parameter values or uncertainties. The main gap is that the central claim of a 'model-independent, data-driven approach' is not supported, because the training data are generated from the authors' own forward models and no test on independently generated scattering data is reported. The paper also does not report quantitative goodness-of-fit statistics for the experimental inversions, which limits the ability to judge the accuracy of the extracted structural parameters.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section III.A; Section III.B] The central claim of a 'model-independent, data-driven approach' is not supported by the presented evidence. The KAN is trained exclusively on simulation libraries produced by the authors' own wave-field model (Ref. 10) for lamellae and by the authors' MD pipeline (Ref. 3) for colloids. Consequently, the experimental inversion returns parameters of those same forward models, and the fitted parameters have real-space meaning only to the extent that those models are correct. Held-out tests within the same pipeline validate the KAN as a surrogate for the forward model, but they do not establish model independence. The authors should either temper the 'model-independent' claim in the abstract and conclusions or demonstrate parameter recovery on scattering data generated by an independent model outside the training family (e.g., a different simulation approach or a different closure relation).
  2. [Section III.A; Fig. 4] The lamellar experimental fits are not quantitatively documented. The text acknowledges significant discrepancies for Q\tilde{d} < 1, yet the paper reports no goodness-of-fit statistics, no fitted values of (\sigma_k, \Gamma, \alpha) for the 30%, 40%, and 50% AOT samples, and no uncertainty estimates from Algorithm 1. Without these numbers, the three-dimensional structural renderings in Fig. 5 and the claim that the KAN 'enabled the resolution of structural distortions' cannot be assessed. Please report the fitted parameters, their uncertainties, and residual statistics separately for Q\tilde{d} < 1 and Q\tilde{d} > 1.
  3. [Section III.B; Fig. 8] The experimental colloid inversion is not sufficiently validated or documented. The particle diameter D=115 nm and 6% polydispersity are obtained from a fit to the 1 wt% data, but no confidence intervals for D are given. The fitted potential parameters (A, \kappa, \phi) for each weight fraction are also not reported. The VR(r/D) curves in Fig. 8(b) are shown without error bars, and no comparison with an independent inversion method (e.g., HNC, RMSA, or an alternate closure) is provided. As a result, the conclusion that the KAN achieves 'excellent agreement with both molecular dynamics simulations and experimental data' is only demonstrated for S(Q) on the MD test set, not for the experimental potential inversion. Please provide the fitted values, uncertainties, and an independent cross-check of the inverted potential.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III.B] The sentence 'This report contends that achieving a perfect closure for solving the inverse scattering problem is unattainable' uses 'report' in an unusual way; 'we contend' or 'the present work contends' would be clearer.
  2. [Section III.A; Section IV] The notation 'D 2O' should be rendered as 'D2O' with proper subscript formatting, and the tilde placement in 'Q \tilde{d}' should be defined explicitly to avoid ambiguity in plain text.
  3. [Section III.A; Section III.B] The training set details are not reported: no number of training samples, no parameter ranges for (\sigma_k, \Gamma, \alpha) or (\phi, 1/\kappa D, \ln A), and no network hyperparameters (depth, width, spline knots, learning rate). Providing these details would aid reproducibility.
  4. [Algorithm 1] The convergence threshold L_c and the specific minimization algorithm used in each case study are not stated; please specify these choices so that the fitting procedure is reproducible.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The experimental inversions are not model-independent: the KAN is trained on the authors' own wave-field and Yukawa/MD libraries, and the reported real-space structures are re-renderings of those same forward models at fitted parameters.

  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Section III.A, defective lamellar phases, paragraph introducing the wave-field descriptor]
    "We propose a conformational descriptor for defective lamellar phases based on a wave field representation 10. In this framework, we have demonstrated that the structure of defective lamellar phases can be uniquely characterized by three parameters: σk, which represents the standard deviation of the wave vector in the wave field that models the density fluctuation of lamellar phases; Γ, which quantifies the degree of symmetry in the ordering of lamellar phases; and α, which measures the volume ratio of amphiphilic molecules to water."

    The three-parameter completeness claim is taken from the authors' own Ref. 10, which is also the source of the training set used to train the KAN ('training set 10'). The KAN's input space and the final real-space renderings are therefore both defined by that self-cited representation. If the representation is incomplete, the fitted parameters have no independent real-space meaning; the paper does not test the uniqueness claim against any data outside Ref. 10. The central premise is thus imported from the authors' prior work rather than established in this paper.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section III.A, KAN training for lamellar phases and Fig. 5 (real-space visualization)]
    "The KAN model is then trained to capture the relations between Itrain and {σk, Γ, α} in the training set10. ... From the values of σk, Γ, and α, a three-dimensional wave field representation of lamellar structure (Fig. 5) is constructed. ... Real-space renderings of these distorted lamellar phases, including inter-layer distances and in-plane correlation lengths, are presented in Fig. 5, with further details in Ref.10."

    The scattering curves used to train the KAN are generated from the same wave-field representation that later produces the 'extracted' real-space structures. Fitting experimental AOT data with Algorithm 1 therefore returns the parameters of that self-generated forward model, and the reported structural visualization is simply the forward model evaluated at those fitted parameters. The real-space prediction cannot contain information beyond the training library; it is the inverse of the authors' own generator by construction. This is a fitted parameter renamed as a direct structural extraction.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III.B, charged colloidal suspensions, KAN architecture and Fig. 8]
    "By systematically training the KAN using the training set 3 containing structure factor S(Q) and corresponding potential parameters, this architecture effectively maps the input physical parameters to the correction terms of inter-particle correlation... The optimized I(QD) obtained from algorithm 1 align well with the SANS data... Fig. 8(b) presents the inverted VR(r/D) curves, which show little variation across dispersions, with fluctuations within reasonable uncertainties."

    The colloidal training set is the authors' own MD/Yukawa library (Ref. 3): the inputs (φ, 1/κD, ln A, QD) are the parameters of the Yukawa potential in Eq. (7), and the structure factors are MD-generated from that same potential. Fitting experimental silica SANS data with the KAN-generated S(Q) therefore recovers parameters of the training model, and the reported VR(r/D) in Fig. 8(b) is Eq. (7) evaluated with those parameters. As in the lamellar case, the 'inverted potential' is a re-rendering of the fitted training model, not an independent extraction; only the held-out MD test is independent, and it stays inside the same Yukawa/MD pipeline.

full rationale

Most of the KAN mechanics is mathematically self-contained: Eq. (1) is the Kolmogorov-Arnold theorem, Eqs. (2)-(6) define a linear standardization, and the held-out MD test in Fig. 6(b) is a genuine in-pipeline prediction. There is no equation in this paper that is formally identical to another by substitution. The circularity is at the level of the experimental-inversion claims: both case studies train the KAN on libraries generated by the authors' own forward models (Ref. 10 wave-field representation and Ref. 3 MD/Yukawa potentials), then fit experimental scattering with that KAN and present the corresponding forward-model parameters as 'directly extracted real-space structural information' and 'model-independent.' The abstract's 'model-independent' claim is, on the paper's own construction, not supportable: the KAN can only return the parameters of the training family. The paper's admission of systematic low-Q misfit for AOT (Q ˜d < 1) confirms that the surrogate is tied to the training model and cannot adapt to experimental features outside it. Since the central 'transformative' claim depends on the unvalidated, self-cited uniqueness/completeness of those forward models, the circularity score is a partial 6 rather than 0-2.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework leans heavily on training libraries and models produced by the same authors (Refs. 3 and 10), and on hand-chosen ansatze for the direct correlation correction. The number of fitted coefficients (reference baselines, Q-interpolants, spline weights, and the final structural parameters) is large relative to the amount of independent experimental validation, which is three lamellar SANS curves and five silica dispersions.

free parameters (6)
  • Reference intensity coefficients A and B (lamellar) = not reported
    Fit by linear least squares over the training set (Eqs. 2-3); they define the baseline ln Iref used to standardize the KAN target, and the KAN only learns the residual.
  • Quadratic Q coefficients C (lamellar) = not reported
    Fit per input parameter vector (Eq. 4) to interpolate the reference intensity onto arbitrary Q; absorbs the smooth Q-dependence before KAN sees the residual.
  • Particle diameter D and polydispersity (colloids) = D=115 nm, 6% polydispersity
    Determined by regression of the 1 wt% SANS data and then held fixed when fitting all other concentrations; this is a fitted input, not an independently measured constant.
  • Fitted structural parameters from Algorithm 1 = not tabulated
    For lamellar data: σk, Γ, α; for silica data: φ, 1/κD, ln A. These are the outputs of the least-squares inversion, but the paper reports no values or uncertainties.
  • KAN spline coefficients and network weights = not reported
    Trained by backpropagation on the simulation libraries; they are the surrogate model parameters that make the inversion possible and are not physically interpretable.
  • Correction functions f1, f2, f3 (colloid) = learned by KAN
    The ansatz in Eq. 16 expresses ΔG(K) = f1(K) sin(f2(K))/K with f3 as an extra term; these functional forms are chosen by hand, not derived, and their learned parameters are fitted to MD data.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem: any multivariate continuous function is a finite sum of univariate continuous functions.
    Invoked in Sec. II.A to justify KAN expressiveness. It is an existence result and says nothing about how many spline knots or layers are needed for scattering functions.
  • ad hoc to paper Defective lamellar phases are uniquely characterized by (σk, Γ, α) in the wave field representation.
    Sec. III.A, attributed to Ref. 10. The training library and the final structural visualization both come from this model, so the inversion cannot discover structure outside it.
  • domain assumption MD simulations of the Yukawa model accurately represent real charged colloidal suspensions.
    Sec. III.B uses MD-generated training and test sets from the authors' prior work; any force-field or model error propagates into the KAN mapping.
  • ad hoc to paper The discrepancy in the direct correlation function has the form ΔG(K) = f1(K) sin(f2(K))/K.
    Eq. 16. This oscillatory ansatz is motivated by the observed MD discrepancy but is not derived; it constrains what the KAN can express.
  • domain assumption The decoupling approximation I(Q) = ⟨P(Q)⟩⟨S(Q)⟩ holds for 6% polydispersity.
    Eq. 18. The authors note deviations near the structural peak at higher volume fractions, so the approximation may degrade exactly in the regime where the fits are stressed.
  • domain assumption Instrument resolution is not the source of the low-Q lamellar discrepancy.
    Stated in Sec. III.A after Fig. 4 without a resolution-smearing calculation for these samples; the claim is asserted rather than demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering-Based Structural Inversion of Soft Materials via Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RD5ZGFRS

@misc{pith2026241215474,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering-Based Structural Inversion of Soft Materials via Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RD5ZGFRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15474}
}
read the original abstract

Small-angle scattering (SAS) techniques are indispensable tools for probing the structure of soft materials. However, traditional analytical models often face limitations in structural inversion for complex systems, primarily due to the absence of closed-form expressions of scattering functions. To address these challenges, we present a machine learning framework based on the Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) for directly extracting real-space structural information from scattering spectra in reciprocal space. This model-independent, data-driven approach provides a versatile solution for analyzing intricate configurations in soft matter. By applying the KAN to lyotropic lamellar phases and colloidal suspensions -- two representative soft matter systems -- we demonstrate its ability to accurately and efficiently resolve structural collectivity and complexity. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of machine learning in enhancing the quantitative analysis of soft materials, paving the way for robust structural inversion across diverse systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15474 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A general setup of the KAN model setup for scattering func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. KAN-based generative function for scattering intensity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Scattering intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents the SANS intensity, I(Qd˜), for aqueous so￾lutions containing 30%, 40%, and 50% AOT. The intensity is plotted in dimensionless Qd˜. As the AOT weight fraction increases, qualitative trends indicate a reduction in the height of the first correlation peak in I(Q…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Three-dimensional visualization of the structures derived [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) architecture for regres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Panel (a) compares the direct correlation function from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) shows the SANS data (symbols) and the corre￾sponding KAN predictions in the dimensionless representa￾tion of QD. The particle diameter, D, was determined to be 115 nm with 6% polydispersity from 1 wt% dilute dispersions (black symbols). At this polydispersity, the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  2. [2]

    Lindner \ and\ author T

    author author P. Lindner \ and\ author T. Zemb ,\ @noop title Neutron, X-rays and Light. Scattering Methods Applied to Soft Condensed Matter \ ( publisher North-Holland ,\ address Amsterdam ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Pedersen ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Neutron, X -Ray and Light: Scattering Methods Applied to Soft Condensed Matter \ ( publisher edited by Th

    author author J. Pedersen ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Neutron, X -Ray and Light: Scattering Methods Applied to Soft Condensed Matter \ ( publisher edited by Th. Zemb and P. Lindner, North-Holland, Amsterdam ,\ year 2002 )\ pp.\ pages 391--420 NoStop

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    \ Chang , author C.-H

    author author M.-C. \ Chang , author C.-H. \ Tung , author S.-Y. \ Chang , author J.-M. \ Carrillo , author Y. Wang , author B. G. \ Sumpter , author G.-R. \ Huang , author C. Do , \ and\ author W.-R. \ Chen ,\ @noop journal journal Commun. Phys. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 1–8 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    \ Tung , author S.-Y

    author author C.-H. \ Tung , author S.-Y. \ Chang , author H.-L. \ Chen , author Y. Wang , author K. Hong , author J.-M. \ Carrillo , author B. G. \ Sumpter , author Y. Shinohara , author C. Do , \ and\ author W.-R. \ Chen ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 156 ,\ pages 131101 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Ding , author C.-H

    author author L. Ding , author C.-H. \ Tung , author B. G. \ Sumpter , author W.-R. \ Chen , \ and\ author C. Do ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05574 \ ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Machine Learning-Assisted Profiling of Ladder Polymer Structure using Scattering

    author author L. Ding , author C.-H. \ Tung , author Z. Cao , author Z. Ye , author X. Gu , author Y. Xia , author W.-R. \ Chen , \ and\ author C. Do ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00134 \ ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Machine Learning-Informed Scattering Correlation Analysis of Sheared Colloids

    author author L. Ding , author Y. Chen , \ and\ author C. Do ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07926 \ ( year 2024 c ) NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    \ Tung , author S.-Y

    author author C.-H. \ Tung , author S.-Y. \ Chang , author M.-C. \ Chang , author J.-M. \ Carrillo , author B. G. \ Sumpter , author C. Do , \ and\ author W.-R. \ Chen ,\ @noop journal journal Carbon Trends \ volume 10 ,\ pages 100252 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  2. [10]

    \ Tung , author M.-Z

    author author C.-H. \ Tung , author M.-Z. \ Chen , author H.-L. \ Chen , author G.-R. \ Huang , author L. Porcar , author M.-C. \ Chang , author J.-M. \ Carrillo , author Y. Wang , author B. G. \ Sumpter , author Y. Shinohara , author C. Do , \ and\ author W.-R. \ Chen ,\ @noo...

    2024

  3. [11]

    \ Tung , author Y.-J

    author author C.-H. \ Tung , author Y.-J. \ Hsiao , author H.-L. \ Chen , author G.-R. \ Huang , author L. Porcar , author M.-C. \ Chang , author J.-M. \ Carrillo , author Y. Wang , author B. G. \ Sumpter , author Y. Shinohara , author J. Taylor , author C. Do , \ and\ author ...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Liu , author Y

    author author Z. Liu , author Y. Wang , author S. Vaidya , author F. Ruehle , author J. Halverson , author M. Soljačić , author T. Y. \ Hou , \ and\ author M. Tegmark ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv:2404.19756 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    author author V. I. \ Arnol'd ,\ @noop journal journal Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR \ volume 108 ,\ pages 179 ( year 1956 ) NoStop

    1956

  6. [14]

    author author A. N. \ Kolmogorov ,\ @noop journal journal Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR \ volume 114 ,\ pages 679 ( year 1957 ) NoStop

    1957

  7. [15]

    author author R. H. \ Bartels , author J. C. \ Beatty , \ and\ author B. A. \ Barsky ,\ @noop title An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling \ ( publisher Morgan Kaufmann Publishers ,\ year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  8. [16]

    Odena , author V

    author author A. Odena , author V. Dumoulin , \ and\ author C. Olah ,\ @noop journal journal Distill \ volume 1 ,\ pages e3 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  9. [17]

    Nallet , author R

    author author F. Nallet , author R. Laversanne , \ and\ author D. Roux ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. II France \ volume 3 ,\ pages 487–502 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993

  10. [18]

    Zhang , author R

    author author R. Zhang , author R. M. \ Suter , \ and\ author J. F. \ Nagle ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 50 ,\ pages 5047–5060 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  11. [19]

    Lemmich , author K

    author author J. Lemmich , author K. Mortensen , author J. H. \ Ipsen , author T. H nger , author R. Bauer , \ and\ author O. G. \ Mouritsen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 53 ,\ pages 5169–5180 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  12. [20]

    Pabst , author M

    author author G. Pabst , author M. Rappolt , author H. Amenitsch , \ and\ author P. Laggner ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 62 ,\ pages 4000–4009 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  13. [21]

    Bouglet \ and\ author C

    author author G. Bouglet \ and\ author C. Ligoure ,\ @noop journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 9 ,\ pages 137–147 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  14. [22]

    Mihailescu , author M

    author author M. Mihailescu , author M. Monkenbusch , author J. Allgaier , author H. Frielinghaus , author D. Richter , author B. Jakobs , \ and\ author T. Sottmann ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 66 ,\ pages 041504 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  15. [23]

    Castro-Roman , author L

    author author F. Castro-Roman , author L. Porcar , author G. Porte , \ and\ author C. Ligoure ,\ @noop journal journal Eur. Phys. J. E \ volume 18 ,\ pages 259–272 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  16. [24]

    Pabst , author R

    author author G. Pabst , author R. Koschuch , author B. Pozo-Navas , author M. Rappolt , author K. Lohner , \ and\ author P. Laggner ,\ @noop journal journal J. Appl. Crystallogr. \ volume 36 ,\ pages 1378–1388 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  17. [25]

    author author P. T. \ Callaghan \ and\ author O. Soderman ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 1737–1744 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  18. [26]

    author author J. H. \ Davis ,\ @noop journal journal Biochim. Biophys. Acta \ volume 737 ,\ pages 117–171 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  19. [27]

    Chidichimo , author C

    author author G. Chidichimo , author C. La Mesa , author G. A. \ Ranieri , \ and\ author M. Terenzi ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. \ volume 150b ,\ pages 221–236 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  20. [28]

    Chidichimo , author L

    author author G. Chidichimo , author L. Coppola , author C. La Mesa , author G. A. \ Ranieri , \ and\ author A. Saupe ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 145 ,\ pages 85–89 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  21. [29]

    Ukleja , author G

    author author P. Ukleja , author G. Chidichimo , \ and\ author P. Photinos ,\ @noop journal journal Liq. Cryst. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 359 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  22. [30]

    Coppola , author R

    author author L. Coppola , author R. Muzzalupo , author G. A. \ Ranieri , \ and\ author M. Terenzi ,\ @noop journal journal Langmuir \ volume 11 ,\ pages 1116–1121 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  23. [31]

    Jóhannesson , author I

    author author H. Jóhannesson , author I. Furó , \ and\ author B. Halle ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 53 ,\ pages 4904 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  24. [32]

    Coppola , author R

    author author L. Coppola , author R. Gianferri , author I. Nicotera , \ and\ author C. Oliviero ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. \ volume 398 ,\ pages 157–167 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  25. [33]

    author author P. L. \ Hubbard , author K. M. \ McGrath , \ and\ author P. T. \ Callaghan ,\ @noop journal journal Langmuir \ volume 21 ,\ pages 4340–4346 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  26. [34]

    Eriksson , author S

    author author S. Eriksson , author S. Lasič , author M. Nilsson , author C.-F. \ Westin , \ and\ author D. Topgaard ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 142 ,\ pages 104201 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  27. [35]

    Kléman , author C

    author author M. Kléman , author C. E. \ Williams , author M. J. \ Costello , \ and\ author T. Gulik-krzywicki ,\ @noop journal journal Philos. Mag. \ volume 35 ,\ pages 33 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  28. [36]

    author author R. B. \ Meyer , author B. Stebler , \ and\ author S. T. \ Lagerwall ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 41 ,\ pages 1393 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  29. [37]

    Bourdon , author J

    author author L. Bourdon , author J. Sommeria , \ and\ author M. Kléman ,\ @noop journal journal J. Physique \ volume 43 ,\ pages 77 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  30. [38]

    author author M. J. \ Costello , author S. Meiboom , \ and\ author M. Sammon ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 29 ,\ pages 2957 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  31. [39]

    Allain \ and\ author M

    author author M. Allain \ and\ author M. Kléman ,\ @noop journal journal J. Physique \ volume 45 ,\ pages 225 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985

  32. [40]

    Allain ,\ @noop journal journal Europhys

    author author M. Allain ,\ @noop journal journal Europhys. Lett. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 597 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  33. [41]

    Allain \ and\ author M

    author author M. Allain \ and\ author M. Kléman ,\ @noop journal journal J. Physique \ volume 48 ,\ pages 1799 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  34. [42]

    Kléman ,\ @noop journal journal Rep

    author author M. Kléman ,\ @noop journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 555 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    1989

  35. [43]

    Strey , author W

    author author R. Strey , author W. Jahn , author G. Porte , \ and\ author P. Bassereau ,\ @noop journal journal Langmuir \ volume 6 ,\ pages 1635 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  36. [44]

    Blanc , author C

    author author C. Blanc , author C. Meyer , author S. S. Asnacios , author M. Kléman , author I. Lelidis , \ and\ author J.-L. \ Martin ,\ @noop journal journal Philos. Mag. Lett. \ volume 85 ,\ pages 641 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  37. [45]

    Moreau , author L

    author author P. Moreau , author L. Navailles , author J. Giermanska-Kahn , author O. Mondain-Monval , author F. Nallet , \ and\ author D. Roux ,\ @noop journal journal Europhys. Lett. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 49 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  38. [46]

    Zhang , author M

    author author C. Zhang , author M. Gao , author N. Diorio , author W. Weissflog , author U. Baumeister , author S. Sprunt , author J. T. \ Gleeson , \ and\ author A. Jákli ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 107802 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  39. [47]

    author author P. J. \ Photinos , author L. J. \ Yu , \ and\ author A. Saupe ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. \ volume 67 ,\ pages 277 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1981

  40. [48]

    Boden , author S

    author author N. Boden , author S. A. \ Corne , \ and\ author K. W. \ Jolley ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. \ volume 67 ,\ pages 277 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1981

  41. [49]

    author author P. J. \ Photinos \ and\ author A. Saupe ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 517 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  42. [50]

    Photinos \ and\ author A

    author author P. Photinos \ and\ author A. Saupe ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 43 ,\ pages 2890 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  43. [51]

    Boden \ and\ author K

    author author N. Boden \ and\ author K. W. \ Jolley ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 45 ,\ pages 8751 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  44. [52]

    Rogers \ and\ author P

    author author J. Rogers \ and\ author P. A. \ Winsor ,\ @noop journal journal J. Colloid Interface Sci. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 247–257 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    1969

  45. [53]

    \ Huang , author C.-H

    author author G.-R. \ Huang , author C.-H. \ Tung , author M.-Z. \ Chen , author L. Porcar , author Y. Shinohara , author C. U. \ Wildbruber , author C. Do , \ and\ author W.-R. \ Chen ,\ @noop journal journal J. Appl. Cryst. \ volume 56 ,\ pages 1537 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  46. [54]

    \ Chen \ and\ author S.-M

    author author S.-H. \ Chen \ and\ author S.-M. \ Choi ,\ @noop journal journal J. Appl. Cryst. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 755 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  47. [55]

    author author N. F. \ Berk ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 44 ,\ pages 5069 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  48. [56]

    author author G. B. \ Arfken , author H. J. \ Weber , \ and\ author F. E. \ Harris ,\ @noop title Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  49. [57]

    author author C. M. \ Bishop ,\ @noop title Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  50. [58]

    Kékicheff , author B

    author author P. Kékicheff , author B. Cabane , \ and\ author M. Rawiso ,\ @noop journal journal J. Physique Lett. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 813–821 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  51. [59]

    author author E. J. W. \ Verway \ and\ author J. T. G. \ Overbeek ,\ @noop title Theory of The Stability of Lyophobic Colloids \ ( publisher Elsevier Publ. Co. Inc. ,\ address New York ,\ year 1948 ) NoStop

    1948

  52. [60]

    author author J. N. \ Israelachvili ,\ @noop title Intermolecular and Surface Forces \ ( publisher Academic Press, Elsevier ,\ year 2011 )\ pp.\ pages 139--140 NoStop

    2011

  53. [61]

    author author R. L. \ Henderson ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Lett. \ volume 49A ,\ pages 197 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  54. [62]

    author author C. G. \ Gray \ and\ author K. E. \ Gubbins ,\ @noop title Theory of Molecular Fluids: Fundamentals Volume I \ ( publisher Clarendon Press ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  55. [63]

    author author P. A. \ Egelstaff ,\ @noop title An Introduction to the Liquid State, 2nd Ed. \ ( publisher Clarendon Press ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  56. [64]

    author author L. S. \ Ornstein \ and\ author F. Zernike ,\ @noop journal journal Proc. Akad. Sci. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 793 ( year 1914 ) NoStop

    1914

  57. [65]

    \ Hansen \ and\ author I

    author author J.-P. \ Hansen \ and\ author I. R. \ McDonald ,\ @noop title Theory of Simple Liquids with Applications to Soft Matter, 4th Ed. \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address Amsterdam ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  58. [66]

    author author J. B. \ Hayter \ and\ author J. Penfold ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 109 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1981

  59. [67]

    \ Hansen \ and\ author J

    author author J.-P. \ Hansen \ and\ author J. B. \ Hayter ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 46 ,\ pages 651 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  60. [68]

    author author I. K. \ Snook \ and\ author J. B. \ Hayter ,\ @noop journal journal Langmuir \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2880 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  61. [69]

    Beresford-Smith , author D

    author author B. Beresford-Smith , author D. Y. C. \ Chan , \ and\ author D. J. \ Mitchell ,\ @noop journal journal J. Colloid Interface Sci. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 216 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985

  62. [70]

    Klein \ and\ author B

    author author R. Klein \ and\ author B. D’Aguanno ,\ @noop title Light Scattering: Principles and Development \ ( publisher edited by W. Brown, Clarendon Press, Oxford ,\ year 1996 )\ pp.\ pages 30--102 NoStop

    1996

  63. [71]

    Heinen , author P

    author author M. Heinen , author P. Holmqvist , author A. J. \ Banchio , \ and\ author G. Nägele ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 044532 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  64. [72]

    author author K. S. \ Schmitz ,\ @noop title Macroions in Solution and Colloidal Suspension \ ( publisher Wiley-VCH, New York ,\ year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  65. [73]

    Belloni ,\ @noop title Neutron, X -Ray and Light Scattering: Introduction to an Investigative Tool for Colloidal and Polymetric Systems \ ( publisher edited by Th

    author author L. Belloni ,\ @noop title Neutron, X -Ray and Light Scattering: Introduction to an Investigative Tool for Colloidal and Polymetric Systems \ ( publisher edited by Th. Zemb and P. Lindner, North-Holland, Amsterdam ,\ year 1991 )\ pp.\ pages 135--155 NoStop

    1991

  66. [74]

    author author F. J. \ Rogers \ and\ author D. A. \ Young ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 30 ,\ pages 999 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  67. [75]

    Huš , author M

    author author M. Huš , author M. Zalar , \ and\ author T. Urbic ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 138 ,\ pages 224508 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  68. [76]

    author author J. A. \ Anta \ and\ author S. Lago ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 10514 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  69. [77]

    author author L. L. \ Lee ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 107 ,\ pages 7360 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  70. [78]

    author author M. S. \ Wertheim ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.321 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 321 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    1963 doi

  71. [79]

    Gillan ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author M. Gillan ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages L1 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.