Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Elementary theory of Magnetoferrons: bringing magnons and ferrons together in multiferroic systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The collective excitations of a multiferroic are hybrid magnetoelectric waves, magnetoferrons, whose gap closes at the multiferroic transition.

desk verdict A useful but overclaimed extension of the authors' own multiferroic model; the spectrum and susceptibility results are new, but the electric modes analyzed are harmonic polarization waves, not the ferrons of Ref. [29]. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15796 v1 pith:EVSUCBE7 submitted 2024-12-20 cond-mat.mes-hall

Mario Castro , Carlos Saji , Guidobeth Saez , Patricio Vergara , Sebastian Allende , Alvaro S. Nunez This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnetoferronsmultiferroicsmagnonsferronsmagnetoelectricsusceptibilityspinwavesLandautheoryPT-symmetriccoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the low-energy excitations of a multiferroic material are not separate magnetic and electric waves but hybrid entities it calls magnetoferrons. It builds a Landau-type phenomenological model in which a PT-invariant coupling term between polarization and magnetization drives a second-order transition into a multiferroic state and simultaneously hybridizes magnon and ferron modes. The central results are a dispersion relation whose gap closes exactly at the transition, and a magnetoelectric susceptibility satisfying the thermodynamic bound $\chi_{me} = \sqrt{\chi_e \chi_m}$. If correct, this provides a unified low-energy description of multiferroic dynamics and suggests devices that couple magnetic, electric, and heat transport in one material.

What carries the argument

The central object is the phenomenological Lagrangian density $L = \frac{\rho}{2}\dot{\mathbf{P}}^2 - F_e(\mathbf{P}) + s\,\mathbf{m}\cdot(\mathbf{n}\times\dot{\mathbf{n}}) - F_m(\mathbf{n},\mathbf{m}) - g\,\mathbf{P}\cdot\mathbf{m}$, where $\mathbf{P}$ is the electric polarization, $\mathbf{m}$ the magnetization, $\mathbf{n}$ the N\'eel field, and the final term is the PT-invariant magnetoelectric coupling. The analysis proceeds by finding the equilibrium values $P_0, m_0$, integrating out magnetization fluctuations to obtain an effective action for the polarization and N\'eel fluctuations, and then solving the linearized equations of motion for circularly polarized plane waves. This produces the magnetoferron dispersion relation Eq. (8), whose structure—one decoupled longitudinal polarization branch and two hybridized circular branches—carries the paper's claims about hybridization and the closing of the gap at $g = g_c$.

What would settle it

Look at the low-energy spectrum of a second-order multiferroic across its transition: the model requires two hybridized, circularly polarized branches whose lowest gap vanishes exactly at the transition and whose curvature diverges there, while the electric branch remains a massive harmonic mode. A spectrum showing a longitudinal anharmonic ferron branch that does not hybridize with magnons, or a gap that stays finite at the transition, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the linear spin-wave spectrum of a multiferroic contains magnetoferrons: circularly polarized hybrid waves formed from magnons (oscillations of the magnetization field) and ferrons (oscillations of the electric dipolar density field). Starting from a Lagrangian with a bilinear, PT-invariant magnetoelectric coupling $-g\,\mathbf{P}\cdot\mathbf{m}$, it finds that for $g$ below a critical value $g_c$ the ground state has $\mathbf{m}=\mathbf{P}=0$, while above $g_c$ both order parameters develop with $\mathbf{m}$ aligned with $\mathbf{P}$. Expanding around this multiferroic state, it derives Eq. (8) for the dispersion; the two in-plane polarization components hybridize with the magnon modes, and the gap of the lowest band vanishes at $g=g_c$, marking the multiferroic transition. The same model gives Eq. (3) for the susceptibilities, including $\chi_{me} = \sqrt{\chi_e \chi_m}$, which saturates the thermodynamic upper bound, and the paper reads the closing gap and diverging curvature at the transition as the spectroscopic manifestation of that bound being reached.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on treating electric-dipole fluctuations as a simple harmonic polarization field in Eq. (1); if the real ferrons of a ferroelectric are the anharmonic, longitudinal modes described elsewhere, the hybrid magnetoferron spectrum may not be the actual spectrum of a real multiferroic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If magnetoferrons are the true low-energy modes, a multiferroic's linear response at microwave frequencies will show two hybridized circularly polarized branches whose frequencies tune with applied magnetic field and with the coupling $g$.
  • The vanishing of the lowest gap at $g = g_c$ means the multiferroic transition is accompanied by a soft mode, so close to the transition magnetoferrons become low-energy excitations that can be driven by weak external fields.
  • Because $\chi_{me} = \sqrt{\chi_e \chi_m}$ is the thermodynamic maximum, the model identifies this class of multiferroics as optimally magnetoelectric: a measured susceptibility below the bound would signal additional dissipation or decoupling.
  • Quantized magnetoferrons carry spin, polarization, and heat currents, connecting the magnetoelectric spectrum to spin caloritronics and polarization transport.
  • A resonant cavity loaded with the multiferroic would show magnetoferron resonances that depend sharply on electric and magnetic fields, enabling field-tunable sensors, memory elements, and microwave processing devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims: the model treats ferrons as massive harmonic polarization fluctuations, whereas the ferroelectric literature emphasizes anharmonic, inversion-broken longitudinal modes; if those modes dominate, the magnetoferron spectrum here should be viewed as a simplified limit rather than the complete multiferroic spectrum.
  • The same PT-symmetry argument should apply to other magnetoelectric couplings, such as the $(\mathbf{m}\cdot\mathbf{P})^2$ form the paper mentions, but the exact gap-closing condition and the saturation of the susceptibility bound may differ for those couplings.
  • A concrete test of the paper's picture: measure the lowest excitation gap of a second-order multiferroic as a function of temperature or pressure through its transition; the model predicts a gap minimum at the transition and a divergence in the curvature of the lowest band there, observable by THz absorption or inelastic scattering.
  • If the susceptibility bound is saturated, the same soft mode that closes the gap should carry the divergent magnetoelectric response, tying a thermodynamic bound to a directly measurable spectroscopic feature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Landau-type phenomenological theory of multiferroics with a PT-invariant linear magnetoelectric coupling -gP·m between polarization and magnetization. It studies the equilibrium phase transition at g = gc = sqrt(aα), computes static susceptibilities (Eq. (3)), and derives a hybridized spectrum of magnons and electric polarization waves, which the authors call 'magnetoferrons' (Eq. (8)). The paper claims that this spectrum has a vanishing gap at the multiferroic transition and that the magnetoelectric susceptibility saturates the thermodynamic bound χme = sqrt(χe χm). It also sketches quantization of the modes and lists potential device applications.

Significance. If correct, the model would provide an elementary unifying framework for hybrid magnetoelectric excitations in multiferroics, with a concrete falsifiable prediction for the susceptibility bound and a suggestive gap-closing mechanism at the transition. The analytic bifurcation analysis and the explicit susceptibility formulas are useful. However, the central conceptual claim that the electric modes are ferrons in the sense of Ref. [29] is not supported: the dynamics analyzed are those of a harmonic polarization field, not the anharmonic longitudinal ferron modes. In addition, Eq. (8), which underlies the spectrum and the gap-vanishing claim, appears to contain a serious inconsistency in the uncoupled limit. These issues are load-bearing, so the paper requires substantive revision before the results can be considered reliable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Spin wave spectrum, Eq. (8)] Equation (8) does not reduce to the correct uncoupled limit. Setting g = 0, Hz = 0, and m0 = 0 in Eq. (8) gives P M = 0 with M = -Ak^2 - K, so the only finite-frequency solutions come from P = 0 (the electric mode); the antiferromagnetic magnon branch with ω^2 = (K + Ak^2)/(s^2 χ⊥), which follows directly from Eq. (7) in the same limit, is absent. The definition M = -Ak^2 - K - m0^2/χ⊥ appears to be missing the term -s^2 χ⊥ ω^2 (and possibly has a sign error). Indeed, the determinant of the linear system (6)-(7) for g = 0 gives (ρω^2 - Ak^2 - K)(K + Ak^2 - s^2 χ⊥ ω^2) = 0, not Eq. (8). Since Figs. 3 and 4 and the central gap-vanishing result are based on Eq. (8), this inconsistency must be resolved.
  2. [Introduction and Eq. (4)] The electric fluctuations analyzed in this work are harmonic polarization waves, not the ferrons of Ref. [29]. In Eq. (1) and the quadratic action Eq. (4), the electric degrees of freedom are described by a conventional massive polarization field, and in the paraelectric limit δp_z obeys ρω^2 = Ak^2 + K. Ferrons, as introduced in the introduction, are longitudinal excitations that exist because of anharmonicity and broken inversion symmetry, with a dispersion controlled by the dynamic permittivity. In the paraelectric regime g < gc there is no ferroelectric order, so the δp modes cannot be ferrons. In the multiferroic regime the paper does not derive the anharmonic longitudinal mode; Eq. (8) is the spectrum of the harmonic transverse branches. The identification of the hybrid modes as 'magnetoferrons' (magnons plus ferrons) is therefore not established, and the title and abstract overstate the connection to Ref. [29].
  3. [Spin wave spectrum, Eqs. (4)-(8)] The derivation of Eq. (8) is not shown; stating that the spectrum is 'readily found' is insufficient for a central result. The preceding equations of motion contain apparent typographical errors (e.g., 'δp⊥−' in Eq. (6) and the placement of the δp_z equation between Eqs. (6) and (7)). More substantively, the effective action Eq. (4) is introduced without derivation, and the definitions of f, χ⊥, and the m0^2/χ⊥ terms are not traced through the integration over δm. The authors should provide the full determinant calculation leading to Eq. (8) or a corrected version, and verify that Eqs. (6)-(7) follow from Eq. (4).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Equilibrium conditions] The equilibrium equations are written as 'gm0 = αP0 + βP2_0' and 'gP0 = am0 + bm2_0'; with scalar order parameters the terms should be βP0^3 and bm0^3. The P0^2 / m0^2 notation is dimensionally inconsistent, although the resulting critical coupling gc = sqrt(aα) is correct.
  2. [Eq. (3) context] The word 'donde' appears in the English text; it should be 'where'.
  3. [Phenomenological theory] There is a typo in 'Giznburg-like parameter' (should be 'Ginzburg').
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The phrase 'the bands bands exhibit significant hybridization' contains a duplicated word, and 'differents values' should be 'different values'.
  5. [General] The paper would be strengthened by a discussion of how the polarization field P in Eq. (1) relates to the ferron order parameter used in Ref. [29]; without this, the term 'ferron' is used in a nonstandard sense.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the magnetoferron spectrum and susceptibilities are derived from the stated Lagrangian, not from fitted or self-referential inputs.

full rationale

The paper is self-contained from the model stated in Eq. (1). The collective Lagrangian contains the magnetoelectric term -g P·m as a postulate, motivated by the authors' earlier work [35-37], but the equilibrium conditions, the critical coupling gc = sqrt(aα), the static susceptibilities in Eq. (3), and the linearized spin-wave spectrum in Eq. (8) are all obtained by explicit minimization and linearization of that Lagrangian. Deriving hybridization from an input coupling is not circular; that is the normal function of a phenomenological theory. The self-citations [35-37] motivate the form of the model but are not used as evidence for the calculated spectrum, which is exhibited explicitly in Eqs. (4)-(8); no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The identification of the P-field fluctuations with 'ferrons' is a semantic choice: the abstract defines ferrons as oscillations of the electric dipolar density field, so within the paper the hybrid modes are ferrons by definition, while the question of whether these coincide with the anharmonic longitudinal ferrons of Ref. [29] is a matter of physical fidelity, not circularity. The vanishing gap at g = gc follows from the same equilibrium condition that defines gc, which is a soft-mode consistency rather than a separate empirical prediction. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological Lagrangian with several free parameters and an imported coupling from prior self-cited work. The only invented entity is the magnetoferron, which is the eigenmode of the coupled model and has no external experimental handle in this paper.

free parameters (4)
  • magnetoelectric coupling g = not fixed; critical value gc = sqrt(a α)
    Controls the multiferroic transition and the hybridization strength; chosen by hand and not determined by data.
  • electric Landau coefficients α, β = α = 2 in figures; β not explicitly given
    Shape the polarization potential; chosen for illustration, not from experiment.
  • magnetic Landau coefficients a, b = a = 0.5 in figures; b not explicitly given
    Shape the magnetization potential; chosen for illustration.
  • gradient, anisotropy, inertia, and spin density (A, K, ρ, s) = K = 0.5, 0.1, or 1.0 in figures; other parameters taken as unity
    Set stiffness, anisotropy, and kinetic coefficients; chosen by hand for illustrative dispersions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Landau-Ginzburg free energy expansion is valid for the multiferroic state
    The paper assumes the order parameters m, n, P are small and the free energy can be truncated at low order, entering in the definitions of Fm and Fe.
  • ad hoc to paper The PT-symmetric coupling -g P·m is the dominant magnetoelectric coupling
    This coupling is imported from the authors' prior PRL 2023 [35]; the paper states other couplings would give similar results, but no microscopic derivation is given here.
  • standard math Antiferromagnetic dynamics are governed by the spin-density term s m·(n×ṅ)
    This is the standard Landau-Lifshitz-type dynamics for antiferromagnets, used to write Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption Polarization fluctuations are massive harmonic oscillators (ρ/2 Pdot^2)
    The model treats ferrons as simple optical polarization waves, even though the cited ferron literature uses anharmonic longitudinal modes.
  • domain assumption Linearization around equilibrium is valid for the spin-wave spectrum
    All fluctuations δn, δm, δp are taken small; higher-order feedback is neglected, so the dispersion describes non-interacting linear modes.
invented entities (1)
  • magnetoferron
    purpose: Hybrid quasiparticle representing coupled magnon and ferron oscillations in the multiferroic state
    The paper provides no quantitative experimental prediction tied to fixed material constants; the entity is the eigenmode of a phenomenological coupled-oscillator model, so it lacks an independent falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elementary theory of Magnetoferrons: bringing magnons and ferrons together in multiferroic systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EVSUCBE7

@misc{pith2026241215796,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elementary theory of Magnetoferrons: bringing magnons and ferrons together in multiferroic systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EVSUCBE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15796}
}
read the original abstract

The collective excitations of a multiferroic material are analyzed. We show that these excitations also exhibit magnetoelectric behavior, leading to the hybridization of magnons ,oscillations of the magnetization field, and ferrons, which are oscillations of the electric dipolar density field. We term these emergent entities 'magnetoferrons', study their main properties, and discuss their potential applications. Additionally, we provide a phenomenological framework for these systems, which will be invaluable for describing the dynamics of the multiferromagnetic state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15796 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Stability analysis of the multiferroic state in terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Magnetoferrons dispersion relation for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Panels (a), (b), and (c) show the curvature of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    P. Tang, R. Iguchi, K.-i. Uchida, and G. E. W. Bauer, Excitations of the ferroelectric order, Physical Review B 106, 10.1103/physrevb.106.l081105 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.l081105 2022

  2. [1]

    N. A. Spaldin and R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelec- tric multiferroics, Nature Materials 18, 203–212 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Q. Song, C. A. Occhialini, E. Erge¸ cen, B. Ilyas, D. Amoroso, P. Barone, J. Kapeghian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. S. Botana, S. Picozzi, N. Gedik, and R. Comin, Evidence for a single-layer van der waals mul- tiferroic, Nature 602, 601–605 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    Bennett, G

    D. Bennett, G. Mart ´ ınez-Carracedo, X. He, J. Fer- rer, P. Ghosez, R. Comin, and E. Kaxiras, Stacking- engineered ferroelectricity and multiferroic order in van der waals magnets, Physical Review Letters 133, 10.1103/physrevlett.133.246703 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.246703 2024

  5. [4]

    Castro, G

    M. Castro, G. Sa´ ez, P. Vergara Apaz, S. Allende, and A. S. Nunez, Toward fully multiferroic van der waals spinfets: Basic design and quantum calculations, Nano Letters 24, 7911–7918 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [5]

    Mostovoy, Multiferroics: different routes to magneto- electric coupling, npj Spintronics 2, 10.1038/s44306-024- 00021-8 (2024)

    M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: different routes to magneto- electric coupling, npj Spintronics 2, 10.1038/s44306-024- 00021-8 (2024)

    doi:10.1038/s44306-024- 2024

  7. [6]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polar- ization, Nature 426, 55–58 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [7]

    W. S. Gan, Spontaneous symmetry break- ing and phonon as the goldstone mode, in Gauge Invariance Approach to Acoustic Fields (Springer Singapore, 2019) p. 59–62. 6

    work page 2019

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    P. W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics, edited by P. W. Anderson (CRC Press, 2018)

    2018

  2. [9]

    A. V. Chumak, V. Vasyuchka, A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Magnon spintronics, Nature Physics 11, 453–461 (2015)

    2015

  3. [10]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Advances in coherent magnonics, Nature Re- views Materials 6, 1114–1135 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    H. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Physics Reports 965, 1–74 (2022)

    2022

  5. [12]

    Flebus, D

    B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. Otani, I. Bar- sukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, P. Landeros, J. Aker- man, U. Ebels, P. Pirro, V. E. Demidov, K. Schultheiss, G. Csaba, Q. Wang, F. Ciubotaru, D. E. Nikonov, P. Che, R. Hertel, T. Ono, D. Afanasiev, J. Mentink, T. Rasing, B. H...

    2024

  6. [13]

    J. S. Harms, H. Y. Yuan, and R. A. Duine, Antimagnon- ics, AIP Advances 14, 10.1063/5.0151652 (2024)

    2024 doi

  7. [14]

    C. Saji, R. E. Troncoso, V. L. Carvalho-Santos, D. Alt- bir, and A. S. Nunez, Hopfion-driven magnonic hall effect and magnonic focusing, Physical Review Letters 131, 10.1103/physrevlett.131.166702 (2023)

    2023 doi

  8. [15]

    Jiang, J

    Z. Jiang, J. Lim, Y. Li, W. Pfaff, T.-H. Lo, J. Qian, A. Schleife, J.-M. Zuo, V. Novosad, and A. Hoffmann, Integrating magnons for quantum information, Applied Physics Letters 123, 10.1063/5.0157520 (2023)

    2023 doi

  9. [16]

    Aguilera, R

    E. Aguilera, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, N. Vidal-Silva, L. E. F. F. Torres, and A. S. Nunez, Topological magnonics in the two-dimensional van der waals magnet cri 3, Physical Review B 102, 10.1103/physrevb.102.024409 (2020)

    2020 doi

  10. [17]

    Y. M. Bunkov, Quantum magnonics, Journal of Experi- mental and Theoretical Physics 131, 18–28 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing, Nature Com- munications 5, 10.1038/ncomms5700 (2014)

    2014 doi

  12. [19]

    Cramer, F

    J. Cramer, F. Fuhrmann, U. Ritzmann, V. Gall, T. Ni- izeki, R. Ramos, Z. Qiu, D. Hou, T. Kikkawa, J. Sinova, U. Nowak, E. Saitoh, and M. Kl¨ aui, Magnon detection us- ing a ferroic collinear multilayer spin valve, Nature Com- munications 9, 10.1038/s41467-018-03485-5 (2018)

    2018 doi

  13. [20]

    H. Wu, L. Huang, C. Fang, B. Yang, C. Wan, G. Yu, J. Feng, H. Wei, and X. Han, Magnon valve effect be- tween two magnetic insulators, Physical Review Letters 120, 10.1103/physrevlett.120.097205 (2018)

    2018 doi

  14. [21]

    Cornelissen, J

    L. Cornelissen, J. Liu, B. van Wees, and R. Duine, Spin- current-controlled modulation of the magnon spin con- ductance in a three-terminal magnon transistor, Physi- cal Review Letters 120, 10.1103/physrevlett.120.097702 (2018)

    2018 doi

  15. [22]

    M. P. Kostylev, A. A. Serga, T. Schneider, B. Leven, and B. Hillebrands, Spin-wave logical gates, Applied Physics Letters 87, 10.1063/1.2089147 (2005)

    2005 doi

  16. [23]

    Ganzhorn, S

    K. Ganzhorn, S. Klingler, T. Wimmer, S. Gepr¨ ags, R. Gross, H. Huebl, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, Magnon- based logic in a multi-terminal yig/pt nanostructure, Ap- plied Physics Letters 109, 10.1063/1.4958893 (2016)

    2016 doi

  17. [24]

    R. E. Troncoso and A. S. N´ u˜ nez, Dynamics and sponta- neous coherence of magnons in ferromagnetic thin films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 24, 036006 (2011)

    2011

  18. [25]

    R. E. Troncoso and ´Alvaro S. N´ u˜ nez, Josephson effects in a bose–einstein condensate of magnons, Annals of Physics 346, 182–194 (2014)

    2014

  19. [26]

    Nakata, K

    K. Nakata, K. A. van Hoogdalem, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Josephson and persistent spin currents in bose- einstein condensates of magnons, Physical Review B 90, 10.1103/physrevb.90.144419 (2014)

    2014 doi

  20. [27]

    Nakata, J

    K. Nakata, J. Zou, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Magnonic φ josephson junctions and synchronized pre- cession, Physical Review Research 6, 10.1103/physrevre- search.6.033207 (2024)

    2024 doi

  21. [28]

    M. Born, K. Huang, and M. Lax, Dynamical theory of crystal lattices, American Journal of Physics 23, 474–474 (1955)

    1955

  22. [30]

    A. P. Levanyuk, I. Burc Misirlioglu, and M. Baris Okatan, Landau, ginzburg, devonshire and others, Ferroelectrics 569, 310–323 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    N. A. Spaldin, S.-W. Cheong, and R. Ramesh, Multifer- roics: Past, present, and future, Physics Today 63, 38–43 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    Wang, Multiferroic Materials (CRC Press, 2016)

    J. Wang, Multiferroic Materials (CRC Press, 2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Kimura, T

    S. Kimura, T. Fujita, M. Hagiwara, H. Yamaguchi, T. Kashiwagi, N. Terada, Y. Sawada, and K. Watan- abe, Electromagnon by chiral spin dynamics in the tri- angular lattice antiferromagnet, Physical Review B 90, 10.1103/physrevb.90.060413 (2014)

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    Kubacka, J

    T. Kubacka, J. A. Johnson, M. C. Hoffmann, C. Vicario, S. de Jong, P. Beaud, S. Gr¨ ubel, S.-W. Huang, L. Huber, L. Patthey, Y.-D. Chuang, J. J. Turner, G. L. Dakovski, W.-S. Lee, M. P. Minitti, W. Schlotter, R. G. Moore, C. P. Hauri, S. M. Koohpayeh, V. Scagnoli, G. Ingold, S...

    2014

  27. [35]

    G. Saez, M. A. Castro, S. Allende, and A. S. Nunez, Model for nonrelativistic topological multiferroic matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 226801 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Vergara, G

    P. Vergara, G. S´ aez, M. Castro, S. Allende, and ´Alvaro S. N´ u˜ nez, Emerging topological multiferroics from the 2d rice-mele model, npj 2D Materials and Applications 8, 10.1038/s41699-024-00478-5 (2024)

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    G. Saez, P. Vergara, M. Castro, S. Allende, and A. S. Nunez, Ferrospintronic order in noncentrosymmetric an- tiferromagnets: An avenue toward spintronic-based com- puting, data storage, and energy harvesting, physica sta- tus solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters , 2400292 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    K. Rabe, C. Ahn, and J. Triscone, Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Modern Perspective, Topics in Applied Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007)

    2007

  31. [39]

    Auerbach, Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism (Springer New York, 1994)

    A. Auerbach, Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism (Springer New York, 1994)

    1994

  32. [40]

    Borejsza and N

    K. Borejsza and N. Dupuis, Antiferromagnetism and single-particle properties in the two-dimensional half- filled hubbard model: A nonlinear sigma model approach, Physical Review B 69, 10.1103/physrevb.69.085119 (2004)

    2004 doi

  33. [41]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    S. M. Rezende, A. Azevedo, and R. L. Rodr ´ ıguez-Su´ arez, 7 Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons, Journal of Applied Physics 126, 10.1063/1.5109132 (2019)

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    El Kanj, O

    A. El Kanj, O. Gomonay, I. Boventer, P. Bortolotti, V. Cros, A. Anane, and R. Lebrun, Antiferromagnetic magnon spintronic based on nonreciprocal and nondegen- erated ultra-fast spin-waves in the canted antiferromag- net α-fe2o3, Science Advances 9, 10.1126/sciadv.adh1601 (2023)

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Huang, L

    L. Huang, L. Liao, H. Qiu, X. Chen, H. Bai, L. Han, Y. Zhou, Y. Su, Z. Zhou, F. Pan, B. Jin, and C. Song, An- tiferromagnetic magnonic charge current generation via ultrafast optical excitation, Nature Communications 15, 10.1038/s41467-024-48391-1 (2024)

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    Sekine and K

    A. Sekine and K. Nomura, Axion electrodynamics in topological materials, Journal of Applied Physics 129, 10.1063/5.0038804 (2021)

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    E. O. Kamenetskii, Magnetoelectric energy in elec- trodynamics: Magnetoelectricity, bi(an)isotropy, and magnetoelectric meta-atoms, Annalen der Physik 535, 10.1002/andp.202300287 (2023)

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    T. H. O’Dell, The field invariants in a magneto-electric medium, Philosophical Magazine 8, 411–418 (1963)

    1963

  40. [48]

    Kosub, M

    T. Kosub, M. Kopte, R. H¨ uhne, P. Appel, B. Shields, P. Maletinsky, R. H¨ ubner, M. O. Liedke, J. Fassben- der, O. G. Schmidt, and D. Makarov, Purely antifer- romagnetic magnetoelectric random access memory, Na- ture Communications 8, 10.1038/ncomms13985 (2017)

    2017 doi

  41. [49]

    Fusil, V

    S. Fusil, V. Garcia, A. Barth´ el´ emy, and M. Bibes, Magne- toelectric devices for spintronics, Annual Review of Ma- terials Research 44, 91–116 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Su´ arez-Rodr ´ ıguez, B

    M. Su´ arez-Rodr ´ ıguez, B. Mart ´ ın-Garc ´ ıa, W. Skowro´ nski, K. Staszek, F. Calavalle, A. Fert, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Microscale chiral recten- nas for energy harvesting, Advanced Materials 36, 10.1002/adma.202400729 (2024)

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    R. E. Troncoso, C. Ulloa, F. Pesce, and A. S. Nunez, Antiferromagnetic magnonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 92, 224424 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    S. M. Rezende, Magnons in antiferromagnets, in Fundamentals of Magnonics (Springer International Publishing, 2020) p. 187–222

    2020

  46. [54]

    Tapia, C

    A. Tapia, C. Saji, A. Rold´ an-Molina, and A. S. Nunez, Stability enhancement by zero-point spin fluc- tuations: A quantum perspective on bloch point topo- logical singularities, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 10.1002/adfm.202312721 (2024)

    2024 doi

  47. [56]

    Rold´ an-Molina, A

    A. Rold´ an-Molina, A. S. Nunez, and J. Fern´ andez- Rossier, Topological spin waves in the atomic-scale mag- netic skyrmion crystal, New Journal of Physics 18, 045015 (2016)

    2016

  48. [58]

    R. J. Doornenbal, A. Rold´ an-Molina, A. S. Nunez, and R. A. Duine, Spin-wave amplification and lasing driven by inhomogeneous spin-transfer torques, Physical Review Letters 122, 10.1103/physrevlett.122.037203 (2019)

    2019 doi

  49. [59]

    Jaime, A

    M. Jaime, A. Saul, M. Salamon, V. S. Zapf, N. Har- rison, T. Durakiewicz, J. C. Lashley, D. A. Andersson, C. R. Stanek, J. L. Smith, and K. Gofryk, Piezomag- netism and magnetoelastic memory in uranium dioxide, Nature Communications 8, 10.1038/s41467-017-00096-4 (2017)

    2017 doi

  50. [60]

    A. S. N´ u˜ nez, Theory of the piezo-spintronic effect, Solid State Communications 198, 18–21 (2014)

    2014

  51. [61]

    Ulloa, R

    C. Ulloa, R. E. Troncoso, S. A. Bender, R. A. Duine, and A. S. Nunez, Piezospintronic effect in honeycomb antiferromagnets, Physical Review B 96, 10.1103/phys- revb.96.104419 (2017)

    2017 doi

  52. [62]

    H. Guo, Z. Feng, H. Yan, J. Liu, J. Zhang, X. Zhou, P. Qin, J. Cai, Z. Zeng, X. Zhang, X. Wang, H. Chen, H. Wu, C. Jiang, and Z. Liu, Giant piezospintronic ef- fect in a noncollinear antiferromagnetic metal, Advanced Materials 32, 10.1002/adma.202002300 (2020)

    2020 doi

  53. [63]

    Harms, H

    J. Harms, H. Yuan, and R. A. Duine, Enhanced magnon spin current using the bosonic klein paradox, Physical Review Applied 18, 10.1103/physrevapplied.18.064026 (2022)

    2022 doi

  54. [64]

    Bauer, P

    G. Bauer, P. Tang, R. Iguchi, J. Xiao, K. Shen, Z. Zhong, T. Yu, S. Rezende, J. Heremans, and K. Uchida, Polariza- tion transport in ferroelectrics, Physical Review Applied 20, 10.1103/physrevapplied.20.050501 (2023)

    2023 doi

  55. [65]

    B. L. Wooten, R. Iguchi, P. Tang, J. S. Kang, K.- i. Uchida, G. E. Bauer, and J. P. Heremans, Elec- tric field–dependent phonon spectrum and heat conduc- tion in ferroelectrics, Science Advances 9, 10.1126/sci- adv.add7194 (2023)

    2023 doi

  56. [66]

    Tetzlaff, ed., Memristors and Memristive Systems, 1st ed

    R. Tetzlaff, ed., Memristors and Memristive Systems, 1st ed. (Springer, New York, NY, 2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.