Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Effective Metric Description of 2+1 Dimensional Quantum Black Holes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum corrections to the BTZ black hole reduce to a few coordinate-invariant coefficients that fix its temperature.

desk verdict Solid 3D extension of the EMD program with a robust temperature formula, but the universal dictionary is conditional on unproven convergence that quBTZ itself violates. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15960 v1 pith:2NFZS23G submitted 2024-12-20 gr-qc hep-phhep-th

Stefan Hohenegger , Mikolaj Myszkowski , Mattia Damia Paciarini , Francesco Sannino This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords effectivemetricdescriptionBTZblackholequantumgravitycorrectionsHawkingtemperaturecurvatureinvariants2+1-dimensionalqu
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a model-independent way to describe quantum-gravity corrections to the three-dimensional rotating BTZ black hole. It writes the deformed metric as the classical BTZ form multiplied by three unknown functions of the physical distance from the origin, and asks what curvature finiteness requires of those functions. The answer is a short list of universal constraints: at the outer horizon the first and third derivatives of the correction functions must vanish. Under those constraints, the black hole temperature is fixed by a few coordinate-invariant coefficients, and the known temperature of a holographic quantum-BTZ model is reproduced. If the framework holds, many proposed quantum black hole models can be compared through a small dictionary of physical coefficients rather than through their full metrics.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is the effective ansatz (3) together with the physical distance $d(r)$ of Eq. (4). The three deformation functions $\Phi$, $\Psi$, $\Omega$ absorb all deviations from classical BTZ; writing them as power series in the proper distance, rather than in the radial coordinate $r$, makes the expansion coefficients coordinate-invariant. Around the outer horizon the distance is $\rho=d(r)-d_H$, and regularity of the curvature scalars translates into vanishing first and third derivatives, $\Phi_H^{(1)}=\Psi_H^{(1)}=\Omega_H^{(1)}=0$ and $\Phi_H^{(3)}=\Psi_H^{(3)}=\Omega_H^{(3)}=0$, together with bounds on the second derivatives. The same coefficients feed directly into the surface-gravity formula (34), which yields the corrected temperature (35). At large distance the coefficients are the inverse-power series $\omega_n,\gamma_n,\sigma_n$; if those series converge to the horizon, the horizon constraints and temperature can be rewritten as sum rules over the rescaled coefficients. Near the origin, analyticity forces the metric to have the Laurent form (28), and finiteness of the scalar invariants imposes $\Omega_0^2=\Psi_0$.

What would settle it

Construct a metric of the form (3) with $\Phi_H^{(3)}\neq 0$ and all other regularity conditions satisfied, then compute the Kretschmann scalar in a neighborhood of $r_H$: if the scalar remains finite, the universal constraint $\Phi_H^{(3)}=0$ is not necessary; if it diverges, the constraint is required. The same test works for the first-derivative constraints.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Every stationary, rotationally symmetric deformation of the BTZ metric that approaches the classical anti-de Sitter (AdS) geometry at infinity can be written in the form (3), where $\Phi$, $\Psi$ and $\Omega$ are functions of the physical distance $d(r)=\int_0^r dz\,\sqrt{|f(z)|}$ rather than of the coordinate $r$ alone. The paper's central result is a set of universal near-horizon constraints: if the curvature invariants (the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars) stay finite at the outermost horizon, the first and third derivatives of all three deformation functions must vanish there, while the second derivatives are bounded by inequalities. With those constraints, the black hole temperature is fixed by a small set of physical coefficients, $$T = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{$M^{2}$}{$2r_H^{2}$}\vartheta_H(\vartheta_H+\kappa)+\frac{M}{2}\frac{\$Psi_H^{{(2)}}$}{\Psi_H}},$$ where every quantity entering is coordinate-invariant. The same framework maps the holographic quBTZ model onto these coefficients and reproduces its known temperature, which the paper offers as evidence that the framework can encode specific quantum models.

Load-bearing premise

The correction functions have convergent power-series expansions in the physical distance over all regions used, including from large distance all the way to the outer horizon; if that convergence fails, the derived constraints and temperature formula need not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Finiteness of the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars at the outer horizon forces $\Phi_H^{(1)}=\Psi_H^{(1)}=\Omega_H^{(1)}=0$ and $\Phi_H^{(3)}=\Psi_H^{(3)}=\Omega_H^{(3)}=0$ for every metric of the ansatz.
  • The corrected temperature of any such deformed BTZ black hole is given by Eq. (35), so different quantum models that share the horizon radius and the ratios $\Phi_H^{(2)}/\Phi_H$, $\Psi_H^{(2)}/\Psi_H$ predict the same temperature.
  • When the large-distance series converges all the way to the horizon, the near-horizon second derivatives are identified with infinite sums of rescaled coefficients, and the temperature takes the equivalent form (36).
  • The holographic quBTZ model fits the framework: its first and third horizon derivatives vanish automatically, and the general temperature formula reduces to the model's known result.
  • Near the origin, analyticity of the deformation functions restricts the metric to a specific Laurent form and requires $\Omega_0^2=\Psi_0$ for the curvature scalars to stay finite.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same dictionary can be used as a classification tool: two quantum-gravity models that produce identical coefficients ($r_H$, $\Phi_H^{(2)}/\Phi_H$, $\Psi_H^{(2)}/\Psi_H$) are thermodynamically indistinguishable at the horizon, regardless of how different their ultraviolet constructions are.
  • A testable extension would be to feed the constraints into the first law $T\,dS=dM-\omega_H\,dJ$; if the resulting entropy is path-dependent for some model, that model would violate the integrability the framework could demand.
  • The origin condition $\Omega_0^2=\Psi_0$ gives a necessary condition for a deformed BTZ geometry to have a regular interior; the quBTZ model, having an essential singularity at the origin, must fail the analyticity premise instead, which sharpens where the effective description breaks down.
  • One could confront the temperature formula (35) with numerical or holographic determinations of the temperature in other quantum-corrected BTZ models and check whether the second-derivative ratios match the predicted combination.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes the effective-metric-description framework, previously developed for four-dimensional static black holes, to stationary rotating 2+1-dimensional black holes that asymptote to AdS and classically reduce to BTZ. The deformation of the BTZ metric is encoded by three functions Phi, Psi, and Omega of the physical proper distance d(r), and the paper derives constraints on these functions by requiring the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars to be finite at the horizon, at spatial infinity, and at the origin. The main results are the near-horizon constraints Phi_H^(1)=Psi_H^(1)=Omega_H^(1)=0 and Phi_H^(3)=Psi_H^(3)=Omega_H^(3)=0, the general Hawking-temperature formula T = (1/2*pi) * sqrt( M^2/(2*r_H^2) * theta_H*(theta_H+kappa) + (M/2)*(Psi_H^(2)/Psi_H) ), and an origin constraint Omega_0^2 = Psi_0. The framework is then applied to the holographically constructed quBTZ black hole, whose temperature is reproduced. The paper is careful to state that the series expansions it uses are assumed to exist and have finite radius of convergence, and it notes that the quBTZ metric is not analytic at the origin.

Significance. If the claimed framework is valid, it provides a useful coordinate-invariant parametrization of quantum-corrected BTZ metrics, in which a small set of physical coefficients controls the near-horizon geometry and thermodynamics. The algebraic checks in the paper are transparent: the temperature formula reduces to the standard rotating BTZ temperature in the classical limit, and the quBTZ application reproduces the known result, which gives confidence in the near-horizon sector. The paper also exhibits explicit derivations of the curvature-scalar finiteness conditions, which is a strength. The main caveat is that the claimed universal dictionary spanning all three regions rests on explicit analyticity and convergence assumptions whose domain of applicability is not established, and the paper's own quBTZ example violates those assumptions in two of the three regions. Thus the significance is genuine but concentrated in the near-horizon results, while the large-distance and origin branches are conditional extensions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (8), (22), (24)-(27); Sec. 3, Eq. (46)] The large-distance expansion (8) presumes that Phi, Psi, and Omega admit a convergent power series in 1/d all the way up to the outer horizon, as stated in Eq. (22). This is a strong assumption for which no physical argument is given, and it is contradicted by the quBTZ example in Sec. 3: from Eq. (46), Phi-1 is proportional to r^{-3} for large r, and since d(r) is proportional to ell_3 * ln r in this regime, Phi-1 = exp(-3d/ell_3), which has no power-series expansion in 1/d because all Taylor coefficients vanish while the function is nonzero. Consequently, the constraints (24)-(27) and the large-distance temperature formula (36) cannot be applied to quBTZ, and the summary in Sec. 2.4 that these conditions are expected to hold for different extensions is not supported. The authors should either prove the convergence property for a physically motivated class of models, or explicitly restrict the universality claims to the near-horizon sector.
  2. [Sec. 3 and Eq. (9); Appendix A] The origin expansion (9) assumes analyticity of Phi, Psi, and Omega at the origin, and Appendix A shows that this forces the metric to contain no 1/r term. The quBTZ metric (40) contains such a term and has an essential singularity at r=0, as the authors themselves acknowledge. Therefore the three-region effective description is not realized by the model used to illustrate the framework; only the near-horizon branch is validated. The abstract and conclusions state that the approach has been illustrated with quBTZ, but this should be qualified to say that the illustration applies to the near-horizon sector only, and that the origin and large-distance expansions remain conjectural for this model.
  3. [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (33)] The origin constraint Omega_0^2 = Psi_0 is stated as what finiteness of the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars at the origin requires, but no derivation is given and no sufficiency statement is made. Since the mapping (32) between the f, g, h coefficients and the Phi, Psi, Omega coefficients is nonlinear, it is not obvious that this single condition is equivalent to finiteness of both scalar invariants. The authors should either provide the computation in an appendix or explicitly state whether only necessity or also sufficiency is claimed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (11)] The displayed formula for rho(r) has confusing typesetting; it should clearly read rho(r) = 2*sqrt(r - r_H)/sqrt(f_H^(1)) + O((r - r_H)^{3/2}). Please fix the LaTeX.
  2. [Sec. 2.4] The summary of large-distance inequalities uses bar kappa without defining it there; the definition appears only after Eq. (25). Define bar kappa in the summary or use a self-contained notation.
  3. [Sec. 3] The sentence 'When expanded in d, the first and third derivatives of Phi, Psi indeed vanish at the horizon' should specify that this uses the near-horizon expansion (7) and that the evenness of Phi(rho) and Psi(rho) in rho is what enforces the vanishing of the odd derivatives.
  4. [Appendix A and Sec. 3] There are minor typos: 'coincidence' should be 'coincide' near Eq. (53), and 'finitness' should be 'finiteness' in Sec. 3. Please proofread.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the horizon constraints and corrected Hawking temperature are derived from the stated ansatz and matched against the independent quBTZ model; the explicit convergence assumptions limit the scope but are not circular.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. Starting from the deformed-metric ansatz (3), the proper-distance definition (4), and the near-horizon expansions (7), the paper matches the expansions of f, g, h in (10)-(14) and enforces finiteness of the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars. This yields the derivative constraints (15) and (20), and the surface-gravity formula (34) then gives the temperature (35) by direct substitution of (16)-(18). No parameter is fitted to the quBTZ model; instead, Sec. 3 takes the external holographic quBTZ metric of [36,37], reads off Phi, Psi, Omega in (44)-(46), and verifies that the EMD temperature (47) reproduces the published result. The only flagged limitation is explicit: the paper states 'We assume implicitly that the series expansions (7), (8) and (9) exist and have finite radius of convergence', and later notes that quBTZ 'has an essential singularity at the origin', so the origin expansion (28) does not apply to it; similarly, the large-distance 1/d expansion (8) cannot represent the d^{-3/2}-type decay of quBTZ. These are scope conditions on the universality claim, not reductions of the result to its own inputs. Self-citations [20]-[24] introduce the EMD program and positivity conditions, but the horizon algebra here is carried out in this paper and checked against an external model, so no load-bearing circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are parametric in an infinite family of deformation coefficients; the paper does not fit them but bounds them via regularity. The main structural assumptions are the existence of convergent expansions in the proper distance, the existence of a simple outer horizon, and the choice of scalar-curvature finiteness as the regularity criterion.

free parameters (3)
  • Near-horizon deformation coefficients ΦH(2), ΨH(2), ΩH(2) = not fixed
    Model-dependent inputs that the framework leaves free, subject only to inequalities (19). They enter the corrected Hawking temperature formula (35).
  • Large-distance coefficients ωn, γn, σn = not fixed
    An infinite family of model-dependent coefficients constrained by the sum rules (23), (24), and (27), used to connect asymptotic behavior to horizon data.
  • Origin deformation coefficients Φ0, Ψ0, Ω0 = not fixed
    Interior description parameters under analyticity at r=0, with regularity condition Ω0²=Ψ0 (Eq 33).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The deformation functions Φ, Ψ, Ω have convergent series expansions in proper distance d in the near-horizon, large-distance, and origin regions.
    Stated in Sec 2 before Sec 2.1: 'We assume implicitly that the series expansions (7), (8) and (9) exist and have finite radius of convergence.' The entire framework depends on this.
  • domain assumption The large-distance series (8) converges all the way to the outer horizon.
    Eq (22) imposes convergence radii at least dH, which is needed to translate asymptotic coefficients into horizon quantities in Sec 2.2.
  • domain assumption The deformation functions are analytic at the origin.
    Sec 2.3: 'we assume that the correction functions Φ, Ψ, Ω are analytical at the origin.' This is used to derive the origin expansion and regularity condition.
  • domain assumption A simple outer event horizon exists with f(rH)=g(rH)=0 and ΦH=ΨH.
    Eq (6) and the surrounding text require this; the framework does not handle cases with multiple horizons or metrics where the horizon does not have this form.
  • domain assumption Finiteness of the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars at the horizon is the correct regularity criterion.
    Used in Sec 2.1 and 2.2 to impose constraints on deformation coefficients. This is a standard classical GR notion, not derived from quantum gravity.
  • domain assumption The deformed metric can be represented as the classical BTZ factor times deformation functions Φ, Ψ, Ω of a single proper distance d.
    Eq (3) is the core ansatz. While reparametrization of any f, g, h is formally possible when d is monotonic, the universal claims rest on this specific parametrization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective Metric Description of 2+1 Dimensional Quantum Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2NFZS23G

@misc{pith2026241215960,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective Metric Description of 2+1 Dimensional Quantum Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2NFZS23G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15960}
}
read the original abstract

We develop an effective metric description of 2+1 dimensional black holes describing deviations from the classical Ba\~nados-Teitelboim-Zanelli (BTZ) black hole. The latter is a classical 2+1 dimensional rotating black hole with constant negative curvature. The effective metric is constrained by imposing the black hole symmetries and asymptotic classical behavior. The deformed metric is parametrized in terms of a physical quantity that we choose to be a physical distance. The latter can be solved for in three main regions of interest, the one around the horizon, origin, and spatial infinity. The finiteness of physical quantities at the horizon, such as the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars, leads to universal constraints on the physical parameters of the metric around the horizon. This allows us to further derive the general form of the corrected Hawking temperature in terms of the physical parameters of the effective metric. Assuming that the approach can be generalized to the interior of the black hole, we further develop an effective metric description near the origin. To illustrate the approach, we show how to recast the information encoded in a specific model of quantum BTZ known as quBTZ black hole in terms of the effective metric coefficients.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15960 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Expansions of the quantum corrected BTZ black hole metric deformation function Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory

    Karl Schwarzschild. “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory”. In: Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ) 1916 (1916), pp. 189–

    work page 1916

  2. [2]

    Black Holes and Thermodynamics

    S. W. Hawking. “Black Holes and Thermodynamics”. In: Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976), pp. 191–197. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.191

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.191 1976

  3. [3]

    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

    Clifford M. Will. “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment”. In: Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014), p. 4.doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4. arXiv: 1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Astrophysical Black Holes: A Review

    Cosimo Bambi. “Astrophysical Black Holes: A Review”. In: PoS MULTIF2019 (2020), p. 028. doi: 10.22323/1.362.0028. arXiv: 1906.03871 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Gravitational Waves Through Time: Scientific Significance, Detection Tech- niques, and Recent Breakthroughs

    Chris Jia. “Gravitational Waves Through Time: Scientific Significance, Detection Tech- niques, and Recent Breakthroughs”. In: (Dec. 2023). arXiv: 2312.16198 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    What if ... General Relativity is not the theory?

    Orfeu Bertolami. “What if ... General Relativity is not the theory?” In: Mem. Soc. Ast. It. 83 (2012). Ed. by S. Anton et al., p. 1081. arXiv: 1112.2048 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities

    Roger Penrose. “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (1965), pp. 57–59. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.57 1965

  8. [8]

    Quantum gravity: General introduction and recent developments

    Claus Kiefer. “Quantum gravity: General introduction and recent developments”. In: Annalen Phys. 15 (2005), pp. 129–148. doi: 10 . 1002 / andp . 200510175. arXiv: gr - qc/0508120

    work page arXiv 2005

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review

    Chen Lan et al. “Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review”. In: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62.9 (2023), p. 202. doi: 10.1007/s10773-023-05454-1 . arXiv: 2303.11696 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics

    Niels Emil Jannik Bjerrum-Bohr, John F. Donoghue, and Barry R. Holstein. “Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics”. In: Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003). [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.D 71, 069904 (2005)], p. 084005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.084005 . arXiv: hep-th/0211071

    2003 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Effective models of non- singular quantum black holes

    Mariano Cadoni, Mauro Oi, and Andrea Pierfrancesco Sanna. “Effective models of non- singular quantum black holes”. In: Phys. Rev. D 106.2 (2022), p. 024030. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.024030. arXiv: 2204.09444 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse

    James Bardeen. “Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse”. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity . Sept. 1968, p. 87

    1968

  5. [13]

    Vacuum nonsingular black hole

    I. Dymnikova. “Vacuum nonsingular black hole”. In: Gen. Rel. Grav. 24 (1992), pp. 235–

    1992

  6. [14]

    Stability of a vacuum nonsingular black hole

    Irina Dymnikova and Evgeny Galaktionov. “Stability of a vacuum nonsingular black hole”. In: Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005), pp. 2331–2358. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/22/ 12/003. arXiv: gr-qc/0409049

    2005 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Formation and evaporation of regular black holes

    Sean A. Hayward. “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006), p. 031103. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 96 . 031103. arXiv: gr - qc / 0506126

    2006

  8. [16]

    Notes on nonsingular models of black holes

    Valeri P. Frolov. “Notes on nonsingular models of black holes”. In: Phys. Rev. D 94.10 (2016), p. 104056. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104056. arXiv: 1609.01758 [gr-qc]. 16

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Black-bounce to traversable wormhole

    Alex Simpson and Matt Visser. “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole”. In: JCAP 02 (2019), p. 042. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/042. arXiv: 1812.07114 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores

    Alex Simpson and Matt Visser. “Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores”. In: Universe 6.1 (2019), p. 8. doi: 10.3390/universe6010008 . arXiv: 1911. 01020 [gr-qc]

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Class of Stationary Axisymmetric Solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion Field Equations

    Alberto Garc ´ ıa, Dmitri Galtsov, and Oleg Kechkin. “Class of Stationary Axisymmetric Solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion Field Equations”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (8 Feb. 1995), pp. 1276–1279. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1276 . url: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1...

    1995 doi

  12. [20]

    Effective theory of quantum black holes

    Emanuele Binetti et al. “Effective theory of quantum black holes”. In: Phys. Rev. D 106.4 (2022), p. 046006. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 106 . 046006. arXiv: 2203 . 13515 [gr-qc]

    2022

  13. [21]

    Quantum black hole physics from the event horizon

    Manuel Del Piano, Stefan Hohenegger, and Francesco Sannino. “Quantum black hole physics from the event horizon”. In: Phys. Rev. D 109.2 (2024), p. 024045. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevD.109.024045. arXiv: 2307.13489 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Effective metric de- scriptions of quantum black holes

    Manuel Del Piano, Stefan Hohenegger, and Francesco Sannino. “Effective metric de- scriptions of quantum black holes”. In: Eur. Phys. J. C 84.12 (2024), p. 1273. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13609-5 . arXiv: 2403.12679 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Black Hole Shadow and other Observables away from the Horizon: Extending the Effective Metric Descriptions

    Manuel Del Piano, Stefan Hohenegger, and Francesco Sannino. “Black Hole Shadow and other Observables away from the Horizon: Extending the Effective Metric Descriptions”. In: (Dec. 2024). arXiv: 2412.13673 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Positivity conditions for generalized Schwarzschild space- times

    Alessandra D’Alise et al. “Positivity conditions for generalized Schwarzschild space- times”. In: Phys. Rev. D 108.8 (2023), p. 084042. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084042. arXiv: 2305.12965 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The Black hole in three- dimensional space-time

    Maximo Banados, Claudio Teitelboim, and Jorge Zanelli. “The Black hole in three- dimensional space-time”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992), pp. 1849–1851. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.69.1849. arXiv: hep-th/9204099

    1992 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Geometry of the (2+1) black hole

    Maximo Banados et al. “Geometry of the (2+1) black hole”. In: Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 88, 069902 (2013)], pp. 1506–1525. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.48

    1993 doi

  19. [27]

    Regular Black Holes

    Cosimo Bambi, ed. Regular Black Holes. Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse. Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology. Springer, 2023. isbn: 978-981- 99-1595-8, 978-981-99-1598-9, 978-981-99-1596-5. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-1596-5 . arXiv: 2307.13249 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System

    Edward Witten. “(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System”. In: Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988), p. 46. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5

    1988 doi

  21. [29]

    Lectures on (2+1) dimensional gravity

    Steven Carlip. “Lectures on (2+1) dimensional gravity”. In: J. Korean Phys. Soc. 28 (1995), S447–S467. arXiv: gr-qc/9503024

    1995 arXiv

  22. [30]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and super- gravity

    Juan Martin Maldacena. “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and super- gravity”. In: Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), pp. 231–252. doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998. v2.n2.a1. arXiv: hep-th/9711200. 17

    1998 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates

    Andrew Strominger. “Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates”. In: JHEP 02 (1998), p. 009. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/009. arXiv: hep-th/9712251

    1998 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography

    Edward Witten. “Anti-de Sitter space and holography”. In: Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), pp. 253–291. doi: 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2. arXiv: hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Conformal field theory, (2+1)-dimensional gravity, and the BTZ black hole

    Steven Carlip. “Conformal field theory, (2+1)-dimensional gravity, and the BTZ black hole”. In: Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005), R85–R124. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/22/12/ R01. arXiv: gr-qc/0503022

    2005 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity

    J. David Brown and M. Henneaux. “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity”. In: Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986), pp. 207–226. doi: 10.1007/BF01211590

    1986 doi

  27. [35]

    Black hole explosions

    Stephen W. Hawking. “Black hole explosions”. In: Nature 248 (1974), pp. 30–31. doi: 10.1038/248030a0

    1974 doi

  28. [36]

    Quantum BTZ black hole

    Roberto Emparan, Antonia Micol Frassino, and Benson Way. “Quantum BTZ black hole”. In: JHEP 11 (2020), p. 137. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2020)137. arXiv: 2007.15999 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Three-Dimensional Quan- tum Black Holes: A Primer

    Emanuele Panella, Juan F. Pedraza, and Andrew Svesko. “Three-Dimensional Quan- tum Black Holes: A Primer”. In: Universe 10.9 (2024), p. 358. doi: 10 . 3390 / universe10090358. arXiv: 2407.03410 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Robert M. Wald. General Relativity. Chicago, USA: Chicago Univ. Pr., 1984. doi: 10. 7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001

    1984

  31. [39]

    The (2+1)-Dimensional black hole

    Steven Carlip. “The (2+1)-Dimensional black hole”. In: Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995), pp. 2853–2880. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/12/12/005. arXiv: gr-qc/9506079

    1995 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Holographic complexity of quantum black holes

    Roberto Emparan et al. “Holographic complexity of quantum black holes”. In: JHEP 02 (2022), p. 204. doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2022)204. arXiv: 2112.04860 [hep-th]. 18

    2022 arXiv

  33. [196]

    arXiv: physics/9905030

    arXiv

  34. [242]

    doi: 10.1007/BF00760226

    doi

  35. [1506]

    arXiv: gr-qc/9302012

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.