Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Functional Renormalization Group meets Computational Fluid Dynamics: RG flows in a multi-dimensional field space

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read FRG flow equations for effective potentials in multi-dimensional field space can be solved as nonlinear advection-diffusion equations with an adapted Kurganov-Tadmor finite-volume scheme, at close to second-order accuracy.

desk verdict A solid numerical methods paper for FRG in 2D field space, worth refereeing; the main caveat is an unproven gradient/path-independence condition on the reconstructed potential. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16053 v1 pith:7YY4EGRW submitted 2024-12-20 cond-mat.stat-mech hep-ph

Niklas Zorbach , Adrian Koenigstein , Jens Braun This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechhep-ph
keywords FunctionalRenormalizationGroupKurganov-Tadmorcentralschemefinitevolumemethodadvection-diffusionequationeffectivepotentialmulti-dimensionalfieldspacelocalapproximationWetterich
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that functional renormalization group (FRG) flow equations for the effective potential, a quantity practitioners usually resolve along a single field-space direction, can be solved reliably when the potential depends on two or more directions at once. The key move is to evolve the field-space derivatives of the potential instead of the potential itself, turning the exact Wetterich flow equation — the renormalization-group evolution equation for the effective action — into a conservation law of nonlinear advection-diffusion type, which is then solved with the Kurganov-Tadmor central scheme, a finite-volume method taken from computational fluid dynamics. Against exactly solvable zero-dimensional models with two field directions, the authors report relative errors scaling close to $\Delta x^2$ for the adapted scheme, and they show the scheme survives nonanalytic initial conditions, poles, broken symmetries, and symmetry axes misaligned with the grid. The same machinery is demonstrated on an O(2) and an O($\bar N$)×O($\bar M$) model in three spacetime dimensions within the local potential approximation. If the claim holds, the approach gives practitioners a generic black-box solver for flows with multiple competing condensates or order parameters, exactly the regime where Taylor expansions and naive grid methods are known to fail.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the conservative reformulation of the Wetterich equation: instead of solving for the effective potential $U(t,\vec\varphi)$ directly, one evolves its derivatives $u = \partial_{\varphi_1} U$ and $v = \partial_{\varphi_2} U$, which obey $\partial_t(u,v)^T = \nabla \cdot Q$ with the nonlinear diffusion flux $Q$ given above; this is precisely the advection-diffusion structure that finite-volume methods from computational fluid dynamics are built to handle. The numerical workhorse is the Kurganov-Tadmor (KT) central scheme, a Riemann-solver-free finite-volume method whose only input from the fluxes is the spectral radius of the advection Jacobian; the paper's technical correction replaces the limited slopes used in the original KT diffusion fluxes with central difference stencils, keeping the limiter only in the advection reconstruction. For O($\bar N$)×O($\bar M$) models, an explicit advection flux $f = -(\bar N-1)\tfrac12\partial_t r/(r + u/\sigma_1) - (\bar M-1)\tfrac12\partial_t r/(r + v/\sigma_2)$ arises from the Goldstone-mode contributions, and the boundary conditions at $\sigma_{1/2} = 0$ are enforced through ghost cells combined with an l'Hôpital-based conversion of the singular advection term into a diffusion flux.

What would settle it

In the three-dimensional O(2)×O(3) example of Section X B, run the adapted scheme on grids finer than $\Delta x = 0.015$ and Richardson-extrapolate the minimum position and the curvature masses; the central claim requires these observables to stabilize within the reported error scaling, while a drift or plateau would show the errors do not vanish with resolution. A sharper test would be a zero-dimensional model with strong position-dependent advection whose vertex functions are exactly known from the path integral, since only one of the seven benchmark models exercises the advection sector.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a multi-dimensional field-space FRG flow equation, with its nonanalyticities and competing minima, can be treated as a problem in numerical fluid dynamics. Concretely, the authors show that taking derivatives $u = \partial_{\varphi_1} U$ and $v = \partial_{\varphi_2} U$ of the Wetterich equation for the effective potential converts it into a conservation law $\partial_t(u,v)^T = \partial_{\varphi_1}(Q,0)^T + \partial_{\varphi_2}(0,Q)^T$, where $Q = \tfrac{1}{2} \partial_t r\,(2r + \partial_{\varphi_1} u + \partial_{\varphi_2} v) / ((r + \partial_{\varphi_1} u)(r + \partial_{\varphi_2} v) - (\partial_{\varphi_1} v)(\partial_{\varphi_2} u))$ is a nonlinear diffusion flux; for O($\bar N$)×O($\bar M$)-symmetric models an explicit position-dependent advection flux from the Goldstone-mode sector enters as well. They then discretize this system with the two-dimensional Kurganov-Tadmor central scheme and introduce one systematic correction: the diffusion fluxes are evaluated with central difference stencils rather than the limited slopes of the original scheme, which restores near-$\Delta x^2$ error scaling and removes spurious oscillations. Benchmarks against exact path-integral results for seven zero-dimensional test models, including jump discontinuities in the derivatives, a pole at the origin, a nontrivial vacuum expectation value, and rotated symmetry axes, corroborate the approach. Finally, the paper applies the scheme to an O(2) model and an O(2)×O(3) model in three dimensions in the local potential approximation; the O(2) case reproduces a high-resolution one-dimensional reference, while the O(2)×O(3) case is validated by self-convergence under grid refinement rather than by an independent benchmark.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the adapted Kurganov-Tadmor scheme converges to the correct weak solution of the conservative flow equations even though explicit position-dependent advection fluxes formally break the scheme's total-variation diminishing (TVD) guarantees, a property the paper supports only by empirical benchmark tests and not by a proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • FRG flow equations for effective potentials depending on two or more field invariants can be solved on a Cartesian grid with a generic finite-volume 'black-box' scheme, without Taylor expansions around a flowing minimum or analyticity assumptions.
  • The adapted diffusion fluxes restore near-second-order error scaling for the benchmark models, whereas the original KT diffusion implementation shows degraded scaling and spurious oscillations in several test cases.
  • The scheme carries nonanalytic structures in field space — derivative jumps, poles, competing minima, symmetry restoration, and symmetry axes misaligned with the grid — through the flow without instability.
  • In three-dimensional spacetime, the two-dimensional O(2) flow reproduces the one-dimensional high-resolution reference within the expected resolution error, and the O(2)×O(3) flow converges under grid refinement.
  • Initial UV potentials must be checked for well-posedness: the regularized two-point function must stay positive definite over the whole field space, since some Z2×Z2-breaking potentials yield well-defined path integrals yet ill-posed Wetterich flows with standard regulators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scheme transfers to fermion-boson systems with several competing condensates, the same conservative formulation should resolve first-order phase transitions and multi-minima landscapes in QCD-type models at finite density, where Taylor expansions around a single flowing minimum are unreliable.
  • The paper's well-posedness caveat points to a sharper question: which UV potentials with $\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2$-breaking higher-order interactions produce an ill-posed Wetterich initial value problem, and can field-dependent regulators or one-loop-improved initial conditions cure the failure without changing the infrared physics?
  • The specific correction — central differences in the diffusion fluxes, limited slopes only in the advection reconstruction — could be tested on generic nonlinear advection-diffusion equations outside the FRG context to see whether it is a general improvement to the Kurganov-Tadmor scheme or a fix specific to these fluxes.
  • The three-dimensional O(2)×O(3) application, currently validated only by self-convergence, would gain from a comparison against an independent solver — for example a spectral or discontinuous-Galerkin discretization of the same conservative equations — at shared resolutions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper develops a numerical method for solving functional renormalization group (FRG) flow equations for effective potentials that depend on more than one field-space variable. The authors reformulate the flow equation, originally a nonlinear PDE for the effective potential U, as a conservative advection-diffusion system for the field-space derivatives u = ∂_{φ1} U and v = ∂_{φ2} U. They solve this system with a two-dimensional version of the Kurganov–Tadmor (KT) central finite-volume scheme, adapted by using central difference stencils instead of limited slopes in the diffusion fluxes. The method is benchmarked on zero-dimensional models with two fields or two invariants, where exact path-integral results for vertex functions are available. The benchmarks include nonanalytic potentials, poles in the derivative, broken symmetry, and misalignment of symmetry and grid axes. The authors also present applications to a three-dimensional O(2) model and a three-dimensional O(N)×O(M) model in the local potential approximation. The central claim is that the adapted KT scheme serves as a robust 'black-box' solver for multi-dimensional FRG flow equations.

Significance. If the claims are correct, this work provides a useful tool for FRG calculations that require resolving the effective potential in more than one field direction, such as models with competing condensates or multiple order parameters. The zero-dimensional benchmarks are carefully constructed and provide parameter-free comparisons against independent exact path-integral values, which is a genuine strength. The paper is also commendable for quantifying convergence rates, including cases with slower convergence, and for openly discussing limitations of the scheme, including the formal loss of TVD/TVNI guarantees for position-dependent advection fluxes. The detailed implementation in Appendix B is a contribution in itself. However, the central issue of whether the reconstructed effective potential U is uniquely defined for the discrete solution is not addressed; this is important because U is the central object in FRG applications and is used in the paper for extracting minima and curvature masses.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, footnote 12; Section IV] The reconstruction of the effective potential U from the evolved fields u and v is claimed to be path-independent: footnote 12 states that the two Riemann-sum procedures 'are equivalent and the results are identical.' This assertion is equivalent to a discrete curl-free condition on the cell-average field (u,v). The paper does not prove that the KT discretization preserves this condition, and generically it will not: u and v are advanced independently by numerical flux differences, and the time derivative of the discrete circulation is a commutator of flux operators that does not vanish identically. At finite resolution, the reconstructed U is therefore path-dependent with an error of some order O(Δx^p). The quantitative zero-dimensional benchmarks in Section IX A extract vertex functions from local differences of u at the origin (Eq. (76)) and hence do not test the global well-definedness of U. Since the effective potential is the central quantity in FRG calculations and is used for the minimum and curvature-mass observables in Section X, the manuscript needs either a proof of exact discrete curl conservation or a systematic numerical study of the path-dependence, showing that the difference between the two reconstructions decreases to zero at the expected rate. Without this, the claim that the scheme solves the flow equation for the effective potential is not fully supported.
  2. [Section X B] The three-dimensional O(N)×O(M) application has no independent reference solution; the validation consists solely of self-convergence under grid refinement (Figs. 23 and 24). Self-convergence cannot detect a systematic error, such as a sizeable violation of the discrete curl-free condition or an error introduced by the modified boundary treatment at the axes σ_{1,2}=0 in Eqs. (73)–(74). The authors acknowledge in Section IV B 2 that the position-dependent advection fluxes formally break the TVD/TVNI guarantees of the original KT scheme. To support the 'black-box solver' conclusion, the authors should add a consistency check that does not rely on self-convergence alone, for example: computing the two Riemann-sum reconstructions of U and reporting their difference; monitoring the discrete curl; or comparing against an independent discretization (e.g., a direct finite-difference solution for U or a discontinuous Galerkin solver) at least in a simplified limit.
  3. [Section IV B and Appendix B] The modification of the KT scheme, replacing limited slopes with central difference stencils in the diffusion fluxes, is essential to the paper's claims, as the original scheme is reported to give incorrect error scaling and spurious oscillations (Fig. 9). However, this modification is not validated on any standard test problem from the numerical analysis literature; the only evidence comes from the FRG benchmarks themselves. Because the adapted scheme is expected to have different stability and accuracy properties than the standard KT scheme, the paper would be strengthened by a demonstration that the modified diffusion treatment is correct on a canonical linear or nonlinear advection-diffusion equation with a known exact solution, and by a discussion of whether the scheme remains positivity-preserving or total-variation-diminishing in the relevant limits.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (55)] In the definition of the numerical flux P^y, the second term uses \bar u_{jx+1,jy} as the first argument of Q^y; this appears to be a typo and should likely read \bar u_{jx,jy+1}, consistent with the cell interface at which the flux is evaluated.
  2. [Section IX A 2, Tables III and IV] The error scaling exponents for test case IV (n=1.47 for Γ^(2)) and for test case VI (n≈1 and lower for off-diagonal components) are considerably below the nominal Δx^2. The text sometimes says 'in agreement with the expected Δx^2 scaling' before qualifying; it would be clearer to state the observed order directly in the main text to avoid overstatement.
  3. [Section IV B, item 2 and Section XI B] The phrase 'blackbox solver' is used both when the formal TVD/TVNI guarantees are lost and when the discrete curl-free condition is not enforced. It would be more precise to describe the method as a robust empirical solver whose guarantees are not yet fully characterized.
  4. [Eq. (78) and (80)] The expressions for the symmetry observables O_{u,L1} and O_{u,L∞} involve division by the coordinate x_i, which is singular at the origin; the text should specify how cells with x_i=0 are handled, or define the observable in terms of the radial derivative of U to avoid the division.
  5. [Appendix A and acknowledgments] The manuscript mentions that the code will be published, but no repository link is provided. For a numerical-methods paper, a public code link would materially improve reproducibility.
  6. [General] There are several typographical issues, including 'glskt' in Section IX C, 'discontiuities' in Section IX B 2, and 'quantitfy' in Section X A 2. A careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the KT-solver claim is supported by independent exact path-integral benchmarks and a re-derived conservative formulation; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the adapted two-dimensional KT scheme solves the conservative FRG flow equations with approximately Delta x^2 error—is not circular. The conservative system in Eqs. (18)-(20) is obtained from the exact zero-dimensional Wetterich equation by a displayed derivative identity, not by fitting a parameter or by assuming the conclusion. The zero-dimensional benchmarks are checked against independent exact path-integral values (Tables I and Eqs. (88), (96), (102)-(103)); these comparisons do not depend on the solver's outputs or on the authors' prior work. The only substantive self-citations are to the authors' own previous works for the 1D KT scheme and for practical setup choices such as boundary conditions and domain sizes, but the 2D solver is also independently benchmarked against exact zero-dimensional results, so those citations are not load-bearing. The 3D O(2) comparison against the 1D KT scheme of Ref. [37] is a consistency check between two different discretizations, and the 3D O(N)xO(M) section self-consistently demonstrates convergence under refinement; the paper explicitly states that no independent benchmark is available there, which is an acknowledged validation gap rather than a circular derivation. The reconstructed-potential equivalence in footnote 12 is asserted as a property of the Riemann sums; the possible failure of a discrete curl-free condition is a correctness or robustness concern for the scheme, not a reduction of the output to the input. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' own work to force the chosen scheme.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the UV potentials and numerical control parameters are test inputs. The central numerical claim rests on standard FRG equations plus empirical assumptions about the adapted KT scheme, boundary conditions, and the adequacy of LPA for the 3D demonstrations.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The zero-dimensional Wetterich equation exactly evolves the effective average action toward the quantum effective action.
    Foundation of the FRG approach, used in Eq. (6) in Section III A; accepted background, not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The regularized two-point function Gamma^(2)+R is invertible and has positive eigenvalues for all RG times and all field-space points.
    Required for the inversion in Eq. (12); Section III E identifies a counterexample and restricts the study to well-posed initial conditions.
  • standard math Differentiating the flow equation with respect to fields commutes with the RG-time derivative, and the conservative form admits the physical weak solution.
    Used to derive Eqs. (18) to (21); relies on distributional derivatives and on the scheme selecting the correct weak solution.
  • ad hoc to paper Replacing limited slopes by central difference stencils in the diffusion fluxes preserves accuracy and removes spurious oscillations.
    The core numerical adaptation in Section IV B and Appendix B 3d; validated by benchmarks against exact results, but no formal stability proof is provided.
  • domain assumption Artificial boundaries at finite field-space extent, with linear extrapolation and symmetry ghost cells, do not contaminate interior results.
    Described in Section IV B 1 and Appendix B 3a; validated only by choosing large enough domains, not by a rigorous asymptotic analysis.
  • domain assumption The LPA truncation and Litim regulator are adequate for the 3D examples.
    Used in Section X A 1 and X B 1; standard approximation in FRG practice, not exact, and no independent benchmark is available for the O(N)xO(M) example.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Functional Renormalization Group meets Computational Fluid Dynamics: RG flows in a multi-dimensional field space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7YY4EGRW

@misc{pith2026241216053,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Functional Renormalization Group meets Computational Fluid Dynamics: RG flows in a multi-dimensional field space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7YY4EGRW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16053}
}
read the original abstract

Within the Functional Renormalisation Group (FRG) approach, we present a fluid-dynamical approach to solving flow equations for models living in a multi-dimensional field space. To this end, the underlying exact flow equation of the effective potential is reformulated as a set of nonlinear advection-diffusion-type equations which can be solved using the Kurganov-Tadmor central scheme, a modern finite-volume discretization from computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by performing explicit benchmark tests using zero-dimensional models with two discretized field space directions or two symmetry invariants. Our techniques can be directly applied to flow equations of effective potentials of general (fermion-)boson systems with multiple invariants or condensates, as we also demonstrate for two concrete examples in three spacetime dimensions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16053 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sketch of the two-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The relative error ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Relative error ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. The relative error ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_20.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: 2. Discussion Let us now discuss the results of the RG flow of the O(N¯) × O(M¯ ) model in three dimensions. a. Qualitative discussion In the present case, the UV potential has a global O(N¯)×O(M¯ ) symmetry. How￾ever, there is no O(N¯ +M¯ ) symmetry and also the O(N¯…
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Relative error of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_23.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. A sketch of a single fluid cell with the center point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_25.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum critical fan and emergent relativistic symmetry of two-dimensional Dirac semimetals

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A functional-RG calculation maps the chiral Ising Gross-Neveu-Yukawa phase diagram, confirming emergent relativistic symmetry at the quantum critical point and 2D Ising behavior at the finite-temperature transition.

  2. Solving Functional Renormalization Group Equations with Neural Networks

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A neural network that learns fRG flows from the equation residual, with a large-N analytic baseline, matches finite-difference and discontinuous-Galerkin solvers for O(N) models.

  3. Critical scaling for spectral functions

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A spectral renormalisation group computation extracts the anomalous dimension eta ~ 0.1 for 2+1-dimensional phi^4 theory in the scaling regime, within a truncated approximation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    fluid fields

    Test case V: nonvanishing field expectation value We begin with the discussion of the test case V, where the UV potential has no global symmetry anymore. As already discussed in Section VII A, this also leads to a nonvanishing expectation value ⟨⃗ϕ ⟩, i.e., a nontrivial IR minimum. Still, the IR potential has in general to be convex and also to be smooth ...

  2. [2]

    Error scaling of the two-point vertex function In order to estimate discretization errors from the two- dimensional KT scheme we follow Ref

    Quantitative benchmark tests a. Error scaling of the two-point vertex function In order to estimate discretization errors from the two- dimensional KT scheme we follow Ref. [37] and study the relative error of the two-point vertex functions for test cases I-IV, i.e., we study Γ(2) Γ(2) exact − 1 (104) TABLE II. Numerical control parameters used for the va...

  3. [3]

    Interestingly, we ob- serve that the KT scheme in its original form as presented in Ref

    Especially in the presence of, e.g., nonanalyticities the error scaling can be of lower order. Interestingly, we ob- serve that the KT scheme in its original form as presented in Ref. [80] systematically leads to an error scaling below the expected one, also for smooth potentials, see Fig. 9b. We shall even see that the computations with the original KT s...

  4. [4]

    dif- fusion only

    Test case VI: misalignment of symmetry axes The test case VI, see Section VII B, might seem ex- tremely artificial for FRG practitioners because piecewise potentials with a pyramid-shaped small- |⃗ φ| region are not expected to appear in any physical situation. How- ever, this test case is ideally suited to investigate how the results from the KT scheme a...

  5. [5]

    Setup Our ansatz for the effective average action reads ¯Γk[⃗ φ] = Z ddx 1 2 (∂µ ⃗ φ)2 + ˜Uk(ϱ) (114) with the O(N ) invariant ϱ = 1 2 ⃗ φ2, the RG scale k(t) = Λ e−t, RG time t ∈ [0, ∞), and UV cutoff Λ. In contrast to zero spacetime dimensions, this is of course a truncation of the full effective average action that only contains the scale-dependent eff...

    2001

  6. [6]

    ring” of degener- ate minima from the inner “ring

    Discussion Let us now discuss the results of our RG flow study of the O(2) model in three dimensions. a. Qualitative discussion At the beginning of the RG flow associated with the UV initial condition (120), the potential well separating the outer “ring” of degener- ate minima from the inner “ring” of degenerate minima starts to “melt”, see Fig. 19. The s...

  7. [7]

    , φ¯N )T , (123) ⃗ φ2 = (φ ¯N +1, φ¯N +2,

    Setup Our ansatz for the effective average action is given by ¯Γk[⃗ φ1, ⃗ φ2] = (121) = Z d3x 1 2 (∂µ ⃗ φ1 )2 + 1 2 (∂µ ⃗ φ2 )2 + ˜Uk(ϱ1, ϱ2) , where ϱ1 = 1 2 ⃗ φ2 1 , ϱ 2 = 1 2 ⃗ φ2 2 (122) are the invariants of the O( ¯N ) and O( ¯M ) group, respec- tively, and ⃗ φ1 = (φ1, φ2, . . . , φ¯N )T , (123) ⃗ φ2 = (φ ¯N +1, φ¯N +2, . . . , φ¯N + ¯M )T . (124) U...

    2001

  8. [8]

    Strong-interaction matter under extreme conditions

    Discussion Let us now discuss the results of the RG flow of the O( ¯N ) × O( ¯M ) model in three dimensions. a. Qualitative discussion In the present case, the UV potential has a global O( ¯N )×O( ¯M ) symmetry. How- ever, there is no O( ¯N + ¯M ) symmetry and also the O( ¯N ) and the O( ¯M ) symmetries are separately broken by non- trivial minima. In Fig...

    2024

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    The slicing operator For the matrix formulation of the 2D KT scheme, it is practical to introduce a so-called slicing operator which is used to systematically cut rows and columns of ma- trices. This enhances the readability of the formulation, particularly for readers familia...

  2. [10]

    The two-dimensional grid Since the fluid fields are summarized in the multi- dimensional matrix ˆu ∈ Rdof×Ny×Nx in the following, where Nx and Ny are the number of cells in x- and y- direction, respectively, we need grid objects of the same form/dimension. These are generated ...

  3. [11]

    dof-direction

    The KT scheme in matrix formulation With the definition of the two-dimensional grid as it is done in the previous section, we can now discuss the KT-scheme implementation in a matrix formulation with an arbitrary number of degree of freedoms (dof). This means that we have to d...

  4. [12]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the ef- fective potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the ef- fective potential, Phys. Lett. B 301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    1993 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Ellwanger, Flow equations for N point functions and bound states, Z

    U. Ellwanger, Flow equations for N point functions and bound states, Z. Phys. C 62, 503 (1994), arXiv:hep- ph/9308260

    1994

  6. [14]

    T. R. Morris, The Exact Renormalization Group and approximate solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 09, 2411 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9308265

    1994 arXiv

  7. [15]

    T. R. Morris, Derivative expansion of the exact renor- malization group, Phys. Lett. B 329, 241 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9403340

    1994 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Wetterich, Effective average action in statistical physics and quantum field theory, Int

    C. Wetterich, Effective average action in statistical physics and quantum field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 1951 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0101178

    2001 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Berges, N

    J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Nonpertur- bative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rept. 363, 223 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0005122

    2002 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisa- tion group, Annals Phys. 322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0512261

    2007

  11. [19]

    Gies, Introduction to the Functional RG and appli- cations to gauge theories, Lect

    H. Gies, Introduction to the Functional RG and appli- cations to gauge theories, Lect. Notes Phys. 852, 287 (2012), arXiv:hep-ph/0611146

    2012 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kopietz, L

    P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Sch¨ utz,Introduction to the Functional Renormalization Group , Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 798 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories, J

    J. Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories, J. Phys. G 39, 033001 (2012), arXiv:1108.4449 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonper- turbative functional renormalization group and its ap- plications, Phys. Rept. 910, 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.04853 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Strodthoff, B.-J

    N. Strodthoff, B.-J. Schaefer, and L. von Smekal, Quark- meson-diquark model for two-color QCD, Phys. Rev. D 85, 074007 (2012), arXiv:1112.5401 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Strodthoff and L

    N. Strodthoff and L. von Smekal, Polyakov-Quark- Meson-Diquark Model for two-color QCD, Phys. Lett. B 731, 350 (2014), arXiv:1306.2897 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    N. Khan, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and M. M. Scherer, The Phase Diagram of QC2D from Functional Methods (2015), arXiv:1512.03673 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Lakaschus, Inhomogeneous chiral condensates in low- energy color-superconductivity models of QCD, Phd the- sis, Universit¨ atsbibliothek Johann Christian Sencken- berg (2021)

    P. Lakaschus, Inhomogeneous chiral condensates in low- energy color-superconductivity models of QCD, Phd the- sis, Universit¨ atsbibliothek Johann Christian Sencken- berg (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Schaefer and M

    B.-J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, The Three-flavor chiral phase structure in hot and dense QCD matter, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014018 (2009), arXiv:0808.1491 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mitter and B.-J

    M. Mitter and B.-J. Schaefer, Fluctuations and the ax- ial anomaly with three quark flavors, Phys. Rev. D 89, 054027 (2014), arXiv:1308.3176 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    K. Otto, M. Oertel, and B.-J. Schaefer, Hybrid and quark star matter based on a nonperturbative equa- tion of state, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103021 (2020), arXiv:1910.11929 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    K. Otto, M. Oertel, and B.-J. Schaefer, Nonperturbative quark matter equations of state with vector interactions, Eur. Phys. J. ST 229, 3629 (2020), arXiv:2007.07394 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kamikado, N

    K. Kamikado, N. Strodthoff, L. von Smekal, and J. Wambach, Fluctuations in the quark-meson model for QCD with isospin chemical potential, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1044 (2013), arXiv:1207.0400 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hawashin, J

    B. Hawashin, J. Rong, and M. M. Scherer, UV complete local field theory of persistent symmetry breaking in 2+1 dimensions (2024), arXiv:2409.10606 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Tissier, D

    M. Tissier, D. Mouhanna, and B. Delamotte, A Non- perturbative approach of the principal chiral model be- tween two-dimensions and four-dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15327 (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/9908352

    2000 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Tissier, B

    M. Tissier, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna, Heisen- berg frustrated magnets: A Nonperturbative ap- proach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5208 (2000), arXiv:cond- mat/0001350

    2000

  27. [35]

    Tissier, B

    M. Tissier, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna, An Ex- act renormalization group approach to frustrated mag- nets, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 2131 (2001), arXiv:cond- mat/0101167

    2001

  28. [36]

    Tissier, B

    M. Tissier, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna, XY frus- trated systems: Continuous exponents in discontinu- ous phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 67, 134422 (2003), arXiv:cond-mat/0107183

    2003 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Delamotte, D

    B. Delamotte, D. Mouhanna, and M. Tissier, Nonper- turbative renormalization group approach to frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134413 (2004), arXiv:cond- mat/0309101

    2004

  30. [38]

    Delamotte, M

    B. Delamotte, M. Dudka, D. Mouhanna, and S. Yabunaka, Functional renormalization group ap- proach to noncollinear magnets, Phys. Rev. B 93, 064405 (2016), arXiv:1510.00169 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Debelhoir and N

    T. Debelhoir and N. Dupuis, First-order phase transi- tions in spinor Bose gases and frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053623 (2016), arXiv:1608.01817 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Yabunaka and B

    S. Yabunaka and B. Delamotte, Global fixed point po- tential approach to frustrated antiferromagnets (2024), arXiv:2409.17897 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    C. A. S´ anchez-Villalobos, B. Delamotte, and N. Wsche- bor, O(N )×O(2) scalar models: including O(∂2) correc- tions in the Functional Renormalization Group analysis (2024), arXiv:2411.02616 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Classen, I

    L. Classen, I. F. Herbut, L. Janssen, and M. M. Scherer, Competition of density waves and quantum multicritical behavior in Dirac materials from func- tional renormalization, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125119 (2016), arXiv:1510.09003 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Torres, L

    E. Torres, L. Classen, I. F. Herbut, and M. M. Scherer, Fermion-induced quantum criticality with two length scales in Dirac systems, Phys. Rev. B97, 125137 (2018), arXiv:1802.00364 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Berges and C

    J. Berges and C. Wetterich, Equation of state and coarse grained free energy for matrix models, Nucl. Phys. B 487, 675 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9609019

    1997 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Eichhorn, D

    A. Eichhorn, D. Mesterh´ azy, and M. M. Scherer, Mul- ticritical behavior in models with two competing or- der parameters, Phys. Rev. E 88, 042141 (2013), arXiv:1306.2952 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 43

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Eichhorn, L

    A. Eichhorn, L. Janssen, and M. M. Scherer, Criti- cal O(N) models above four dimensions: Small-N so- lutions and stability, Phys. Rev. D 93, 125021 (2016), arXiv:1604.03561 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Eichhorn, T

    A. Eichhorn, T. Koslowski, and A. D. Pereira, Sta- tus of background-independent coarse-graining in ten- sor models for quantum gravity, Universe 5, 53 (2019), arXiv:1811.12909 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Koenigstein, M

    A. Koenigstein, M. J. Steil, N. Wink, E. Grossi, J. Braun, M. Buballa, and D. H. Rischke, Numer- ical fluid dynamics for FRG flow equations: Zero- dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. I. The O(N ) model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 065012 (2022), arXiv:2108.02504 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Koenigstein, M

    A. Koenigstein, M. J. Steil, N. Wink, E. Grossi, and J. Braun, Numerical fluid dynamics for FRG flow equa- tions: Zero-dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. II. Entropy production and irreversibility of RG flows, Phys. Rev. D 106, 065013 (2022), arXiv:2108.10085 [cond-mat....

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    M. J. Steil and A. Koenigstein, Numerical fluid dynam- ics for FRG flow equations: Zero-dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. III. Shock and rarefaction waves in RG flows reveal limitations of the N → ∞limit in O(N )-type models, Phys. Rev. D 106, 065014 (2022), arXiv:2108...

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Grossi and N

    E. Grossi and N. Wink, Resolving phase transi- tions with Discontinuous Galerkin methods (2019), arXiv:1903.09503 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Grossi, F

    E. Grossi, F. J. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Wink, Shocks and quark-meson scatterings at large density, Phys. Rev. D 104, 016028 (2021), arXiv:2102.01602 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Stoll, N

    J. Stoll, N. Zorbach, A. Koenigstein, M. J. Steil, and S. Rechenberger, Bosonic fluctuations in the (1 + 1)- dimensional Gross-Neveu(-Yukawa) model at varying µ and T and finite N (2021), arXiv:2108.10616 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Ihssen and J

    F. Ihssen and J. M. Pawlowski, Functional flows for complex effective actions, SciPost Phys. 15, 074 (2023), arXiv:2207.10057 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Ihssen, J

    F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Local Disontinuous Galerkin for the Functional Renor- malisation Group (2022), arXiv:2207.12266 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Batini, E

    L. Batini, E. Grossi, and N. Wink, Dissipation dynam- ics of a scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 108, 125021 (2023), arXiv:2309.06586 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    F. J. Ihssen, Resolving the QCD phase structure , Phd thesis, University of Heidelberg (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Ihssen, F

    F. Ihssen, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Numerical RG- time integration of the effective potential: Analysis and benchmark, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114009 (2023), arXiv:2302.04736 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Ihssen and J

    F. Ihssen and J. M. Pawlowski, Flowing fields and opti- mal RG-flows (2023), arXiv:2305.00816 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Ihssen, J

    F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Towards quantitative precision for QCD at large densi- ties (2023), arXiv:2309.07335 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Ihssen, J

    F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Towards quantitative precision in functional QCD I (2024), arXiv:2408.08413 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Ihssen and J

    F. Ihssen and J. M. Pawlowski, Physics-informed renor- malisation group flows (2024), arXiv:2409.13679 [hep- th]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Tetradis and D

    N. Tetradis and D. F. Litim, Analytical solutions of ex- act renormalization group equations, Nucl. Phys. B464, 492 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9512073

    1996 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Litim and N

    D. Litim and N. Tetradis, Approximate solutions of ex- act renormalization group equations (1995), arXiv:hep- th/9501042

    1995

  57. [65]

    Aoki, S.-I

    K.-I. Aoki, S.-I. Kumamoto, and D. Sato, Weak solution of the non-perturbative renormalization group equation to describe dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, PTEP 2014, 043B05 (2014), arXiv:1403.0174 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Aoki, S.-I

    K.-I. Aoki, S.-I. Kumamoto, and M. Yamada, Phase structure of NJL model with weak renormalization group, Nucl. Phys. B 931, 105 (2018), arXiv:1705.03273 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Rivasseau, Constructive Field Theory in Zero Di- mension, Adv

    V. Rivasseau, Constructive Field Theory in Zero Di- mension, Adv. Math. Phys. 2010, 180159 (2009), arXiv:0906.3524 [math-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Keitel and L

    J. Keitel and L. Bartosch, The zero-dimensional O(N ) vector model as a benchmark for perturbation the- ory, the large- N expansion and the functional renor- malization group, J. Phys. A A45, 105401 (2012), arXiv:1109.3013 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2012 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Skinner, Lecture notes: Quantum Field Theory II (2018), [Online; accessed 2021.01.12]

    D. Skinner, Lecture notes: Quantum Field Theory II (2018), [Online; accessed 2021.01.12]

    2018

  62. [70]

    Fraboulet, Path-integral approaches to strongly- coupled quantum many-body systems, Phd thesis, LPMC - Palaiseau - IJCLab, Orsay (2021)

    K. Fraboulet, Path-integral approaches to strongly- coupled quantum many-body systems, Phd thesis, LPMC - Palaiseau - IJCLab, Orsay (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Wetterich, The average action for scalar fields near phase transitions, Z

    C. Wetterich, The average action for scalar fields near phase transitions, Z. Phys. C 57, 451 (1993)

    1993

  64. [72]

    Wolff, The phase diagram of the infinite-N Gross- Neveu model at finite temperature and chemical poten- tial, Phys

    U. Wolff, The phase diagram of the infinite-N Gross- Neveu model at finite temperature and chemical poten- tial, Phys. Lett. B 157, 303 (1985)

    1985

  65. [73]

    Schnetz, M

    O. Schnetz, M. Thies, and K. Urlichs, Full phase dia- gram of the massive Gross-Neveu model, Annals Phys. 321, 2604 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0511206

    2006 arXiv

  66. [74]

    D’Attanasio and T

    M. D’Attanasio and T. R. Morris, Large N and the renormalization group, Phys. Lett. B 409, 363 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9704094

    1997 arXiv

  67. [75]

    ’t Hooft, A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons, Nucl. Phys. B 75, 461 (1974)

    1974

  68. [76]

    Delamotte, An introduction to the nonperturba- tive Renormalization Group, Lect

    B. Delamotte, An introduction to the nonperturba- tive Renormalization Group, Lect. Notes Phys. 852, 49 (2012), arXiv:cond-mat/0702365

    2012 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Blaizot, J

    J.-P. Blaizot, J. M. Pawlowski, and U. Reinosa, Func- tional renormalization group and 2PI effective ac- tion formalism, Annals Phys. 431, 168549 (2021), arXiv:2102.13628 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [78]

    J. M. Pawlowski, Solving integrals with flow equations, Slides for the lecture Non-perturbative aspects of gauge theories winter term 2012/2013 (2013), [Online; ac- cessed 2020.10.29]

    2013

  71. [79]

    Fl¨ orchinger, Functional Renormalization and Ultra- cold Quantum Gases, Springer Theses 10.1007/978-3- 642-14113-3 (2010)

    S. Fl¨ orchinger, Functional Renormalization and Ultra- cold Quantum Gases, Springer Theses 10.1007/978-3- 642-14113-3 (2010)

    2010 doi

  72. [80]

    Kemler and J

    S. Kemler and J. Braun, Towards a Renormalization Group approach to density functional theory – gen- eral formalism and case studies, J. Phys. G 40, 085105 (2013), arXiv:1304.1161 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  73. [81]

    A. G. Catalano, Application of renormalization group techniques to the solution of integrals and Schr¨ odinger eigenvalue equations , Master’s thesis, Politecnico di Torino (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    Braun, M

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and J. M. Pawlowski, Renor- malization group consistency and low-energy effective theories, SciPost Phys. 6, 056 (2019), arXiv:1806.04432 44 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Moroz, Few-body physics with functional renormal- ization, Phd thesis, University of Heidelberg (2011)

    S. Moroz, Few-body physics with functional renormal- ization, Phd thesis, University of Heidelberg (2011)

    2011

  76. [84]

    J. S. Hesthaven and T. Warburton,Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applica- tions, 1st ed. (Springer Publishing Company, Incorpo- rated, 2007)

    2007

  77. [85]

    Rezzolla and O

    L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti, Relativistic hydrodynamics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK, 2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    R. J. LeVeque, Numerical methods for conservation laws, 2nd ed. (Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1992)

    1992

  79. [87]

    R. J. LeVeque, Finite-volume methods for hyperbolic problems, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    2002

  80. [88]

    Reuter and C

    M. Reuter and C. Wetterich, Effective average action for gauge theories and exact evolution equations, Nucl. Phys. B 417, 181 (1994)

    1994

  81. [89]

    D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, Wilsonian flows and background fields, Phys. Lett. B 546, 279 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0208216

    2002 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Gies, Running coupling in Yang-Mills theory: A flow equation study, Phys

    H. Gies, Running coupling in Yang-Mills theory: A flow equation study, Phys. Rev. D 66, 025006 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0202207

    2002 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Kurganov and E

    A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor, New High-Resolution Central Schemes for Nonlinear Conservation Laws and Convection-Diffusion Equations, J. Comput. Phys. 160, 241 (2000)

    2000

  84. [92]

    W. F. Ames, Numerical Methods for Partial Differen- tial Equations , 3rd ed., Computer science and scientific computing (Academic Press, Boston [u.a.], 1992)

    1992

  85. [93]

    Kurganov, S

    A. Kurganov, S. Noelle, and G. Petrova, Semidis- crete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conserva- tion laws and hamilton–jacobi equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 707 (2001)

    2001

  86. [94]

    Kurganov and D

    A. Kurganov and D. Levy, A Third-Order Semi-Discrete Central Scheme for Conservation Laws and Convection- Diffusion Equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22, 1461 (2000), arXiv:math/0002133 [math.NA]

    2000

  87. [95]

    Kurganov, G

    A. Kurganov, G. Petrova, and B. Popov, Adaptive Semidiscrete Central-Upwind Schemes for Nonconvex Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29, 2381 (2007)

    2007

  88. [96]

    Jourdan, G

    T. Jourdan, G. Stoltz, F. Legoll, and L. Monasse, An ac- curate scheme to solve cluster dynamics equations using a Fokker-Planck approach, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 170 (2016)

    2016

  89. [97]

    Tang and T

    H. Tang and T. Tang, Adaptive Mesh Methods for One- and Two-Dimensional Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41, 487 (2003)

    2003

  90. [98]

    Wikipedia contributors, Flux limiter (2020), [Online; accessed 2020.10.15]

    2020

  91. [99]

    J. Rais, A. Koenigstein, N. Zorbach, and C. Greiner, Solving the Lindblad equation with methods from computational fluid dynamics (2024), arXiv:2410.10925 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 12.2 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Pe- terson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, ˙I. Polat, Y. ...

    2020

  94. [102]

    D. F. Litim, Optimized renormalization group flows, Phys. Rev. D 64, 105007 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103195

    2001 arXiv

  95. [103]

    D. F. Litim, Mind the gap, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 2081 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0104221

    2001 arXiv

  96. [104]

    D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, and L. Vergara, Convex- ity of the effective action from functional flows (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0602140

    2006 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Zorbach, J

    N. Zorbach, J. Stoll, and J. Braun, Optimization and Stabilization of Functional Renormalization Group Flows (2024), arXiv:2401.12854 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Braun, M

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and M. Pospiech, Fierz- complete NJL model study III: Emergence from quark- gluon dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 101, 036004 (2020), arXiv:1909.06298 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  99. [107]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020), arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  100. [108]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. Fern´ andez del R ´ ıo, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. G´ erard- Marchant, ...

    2020

  101. [109]

    Kurganov and G

    A. Kurganov and G. Petrova, A third-order semi- discrete genuinely multidimensional central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws and related problems, Nu- merische Mathematik 88, 683 (2001)

    2001

  102. [110]

    Kurganov and E

    A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor, Solution of two- dimensional Riemann problems for gas dynamics with- out Riemann problem solvers, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 18, 584 (2002)

    2002

  103. [111]

    Kurganov, S

    A. Kurganov, S. Noelle, and G. Petrova, Semidis- crete Central-Upwind Schemes for Hyperbolic Conser- vation Laws and Hamilton–Jacobi Equations, J. Com- put. Phys. SIAM J. Sci. Comput 23, 707 (2000)

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.