Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

A complete analysis of inflation with piecewise quadratic potential

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a two-stage piecewise quadratic inflaton potential, a single parameter $\alpha$ controls the amplitude, slope, and dip of the small-scale curvature power spectrum, whose steepest growth saturates at $k^5(\log k)^2$.

desk verdict A careful and mostly convincing analytic toolkit for piecewise quadratic inflation; the end-in-attractor caveat for alpha>1 is real and acknowledged, so the 'complete' claim needs that bound. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16463 v1 pith:KIB36N77 submitted 2024-12-21 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Xinpeng Wang , Xiao-Han Ma , Misao Sasaki This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph MSC 83F05 PACS 98.80.Cq
keywords inflationcurvatureperturbationpiecewisequadraticpotentialpowerspectrumenhancementnon-Gaussiantailsdelta-Nformalismprimordialblackholesultra-slow-roll
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a two-stage piecewise quadratic inflaton potential—two quadratic branches that meet with discontinuous slope and mass—can be solved completely, in closed form, for both the background and the curvature perturbation. Its central target is the small-scale power spectrum near the transition, which governs primordial black hole formation and scalar-induced gravitational waves. The authors find that virtually every qualitative feature of that spectrum—its amplitude, its slope, the presence or absence of a dip, and the steepest growth rate—is controlled by one derived parameter, $\alpha$. They also derive fully nonlinear $\delta N$ formulas showing that the probability distribution of the curvature perturbation develops exponential tails whose asymmetry is set by the second derivatives of the two potential branches; the paper then applies these tails to primordial black hole abundance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the parameter $\alpha$ defined in Eq. (2.15), $\alpha=(3-2\nu_{II})/[(2\nu_I+3)R_\epsilon]$ with $R_\epsilon=\sqrt{\epsilon_{II}/\epsilon_I}$, which measures the relative strength of the decaying non-attractor mode of the background inflaton immediately after the joint. It carries the argument because the second-stage background is a sum of two exponentials whose coefficients are fixed by continuity at the joint; $\alpha-1$ controls the attractor-mode coefficient at the start of stage II, so $\alpha=1$ makes that mode vanish and produces an indefinitely long non-slow-roll phase. The same coefficient structure appears in the perturbation matching, so $\alpha$ sets the amplitude ratio (3.37), the near-IR slope through the next-to-leading-order coefficients in Eq. (3.25), and the dip condition. The other central object is the $\delta N$ mapping built from the logarithmic-duality identities (4.1)-(4.4), which converts $\delta\phi$ and $\delta\pi$ into $\mathcal{R}$ through nonlinear logarithm functions.

What would settle it

For a model with $\eta_{II}>0$ and $\alpha>1$, integrate the full linear perturbation equations numerically past the U-turn without imposing attractor relaxation and compare the curvature perturbation at the actual end of inflation with the late-time formula (3.22); a discrepancy growing as the end time moves earlier would falsify the attractor-end premise. Separately, a numerical spectrum at $\eta_I=5/12$ that does not show $k^5(\log k)^2$ growth near $k_\star$ would falsify the claimed steepest-growth bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the piecewise-linear Starobinsky model is only the limit of a larger solvable class: for a potential made of two quadratic branches meeting at a joint with discontinuous slope and mass, the curvature perturbation $\mathcal{R}$ can be evaluated analytically up to the end of inflation, with the second derivatives $\eta_I$ and $\eta_{II}$ entering the spectrum and statistics on equal footing with the slope ratio. The small-scale amplitude is enhanced relative to large scales by a factor that scales as $(1-\alpha)^{-2}$ (Eq. 3.37), where $\alpha$ (Eq. 2.15) measures the residual non-attractor component at the start of the second stage; as $\alpha\to 1$ the enhancement formally diverges, corresponding to an indefinitely long ultra-slow-roll-like phase that is in practice extremely unstable. Near the transition scale $k_\star$, the spectrum grows as $k^4$ in most of parameter space, but at the fine-tuned value $\eta_I=5/12$ the growth reaches the maximum $k^5(\log k)^2$; no steeper growth is possible for the adiabatic vacuum. On superhorizon scales the $\delta N$ formalism expresses $\mathcal{R}$ as a logarithmic function of the field perturbation and its derivative, giving exponential tails in the probability distribution whose asymmetry is fixed by $\eta_I$ on the negative side and $\eta_{II}$ on the positive side, which the authors then feed into a Press-Schechter estimate of primordial black hole abundance.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that inflation ends only after the inflaton has settled onto the second-stage attractor solution; if a separate mechanism ends inflation before that relaxation is complete, the quoted final power spectrum and statistics are not the observable ones.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The ratio of the small-scale to large-scale power spectrum is $(1-\alpha)^{-2}$ times a known function of the potential parameters, so the model can produce arbitrarily large enhancement as $\alpha\to 1$, with $\alpha=1$ realizing an unstable eternal ultra-slow-roll phase.
  • For modes $k\lesssim k_\star$, the spectrum follows $k^4$ generically but can grow as steeply as $k^5(\log k)^2$ when $\eta_I=5/12$; for the adiabatic vacuum no growth steeper than this is possible.
  • A dip appears in the spectrum at $k<k_\star$ whenever $\alpha<1$ and disappears when $\alpha>1$, the latter corresponding to the inflaton overshooting the minimum and making a U-turn before relaxing to the attractor.
  • The curvature perturbation's probability distribution is non-Gaussian with exponential tails: for modes crossing near the transition the negative tail is fixed by $\eta_I$ and the positive tail by $\eta_{II}$, and this asymmetry changes the primordial black hole abundance relative to a Gaussian estimate—suppression for $\eta_{II}>0$ is larger than the enhancement for $\eta_{II}<0$ at equal $|\eta_
  • Because $\delta\phi$ evolves nonlinearly on superhorizon scales across the sharp feature, using the linear flat-slicing evolution would give a wrong $\mathcal{R}$; the nonlinear map (4.29) is needed to restore conservation of the superhorizon curvature perturbation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the attractor-end assumption fails—for $\alpha>1$ the inflaton only relaxes after a U-turn—the analytic spectrum (3.22) should be understood as a late-time limit; a concrete extension would model a separate end-of-inflation mechanism at a specified e-fold and track $\mathcal{R}$ until then.
  • The $\alpha=1$ divergence suggests a practical diagnostic: in numerical surveys of two-stage models, the enhancement is regulated by how close the real trajectory gets to the vanishing-attractor condition, so a finite-width transition or small $\epsilon$ corrections will set a maximal realistic enhancement.
  • The $k^5(\log k)^2$ ceiling is tied to the adiabatic vacuum; the paper notes excited states can give $k^6$, so the hierarchy of allowed growth rates across initial states and potential features is likely richer than the single-model bound.
  • The nonlinear superhorizon evolution of $\delta\phi$ identified here gives a tractable test bed for the recent one-loop versus conservation debates: one can compare the flat-slicing linear evolution with the nonlinear map (4.29) and check explicitly where conservation of $\mathcal{R}$ breaks and is restored.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies single-field inflation with a two-stage piecewise quadratic potential, allowing discontinuities in both slope and effective mass at the junction. The authors solve the background analytically, derive the curvature power spectrum by matching the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable across the transition, and obtain closed-form expressions for the long- and short-wavelength limits, including the new parameter alpha (Eq. 2.15) that controls the small-scale amplitude, the existence of a dip, and the steepest growth k^5(log k)^2 (Sec. 3.3). They then use the delta-N formalism to give fully nonlinear formulas for the curvature perturbation in terms of the field perturbation for modes exiting before, near, and after the transition, and apply Press-Schechter theory to discuss primordial black hole abundance from non-Gaussian tails.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a valuable analytic contribution. It provides complete closed-form expressions for the power spectrum and the probability distribution function for a broad and commonly used class of transient non-attractor models, identifies alpha as a physical organizing parameter, and sharpens the known k^4 growth to k^5(log k)^2 at a specific tuning eta_I = 5/12. The delta-N formulas explicitly demonstrate scale-dependent non-Gaussian tails, and the paper correctly stresses the nonlinear evolution of delta-phi on superhorizon scales. These are falsifiable predictions that go well beyond the earlier Starobinsky linear-potential literature, and the analytic results are checked against direct numerical integration in a series of figures, although no code is released.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 (end of inflation, pp. 5-6; Eq. 3.22)] The assumption that 'the end of inflation is in the attractor phase' is load-bearing for the central claim that Eq. (3.22) gives the final power spectrum. The late-time limit -k tau -> 0 used there assumes that the decaying mode in z_II (the second term in Eq. 3.8) has become negligible. For alpha > 1, the inflaton overshoots the minimum, makes a U-turn, and only then relaxes; if a special end mechanism intervenes before relaxation, the curvature perturbation keeps evolving and Eq. (3.22) is not the observable spectrum at the end of inflation. Because alpha > 1 is precisely the regime where the dip disappears and the enhancement in Eq. (3.37) is largest, the 'complete' description is conditional unless the authors quantify the relaxation time, specify the end mechanism, or restrict the central claims to alpha < 1.
  2. [Section 3.1 (Eq. 3.12) and Section 3.4 (Eq. 3.37)] The analytic derivation relies on the constant-H approximation H^2 = V_star/3 and on z''/z = tau^{-2}(2 - 3 eta_X) (Eq. 3.12). Near alpha = 1, where the background spends many e-folds in a non-attractor phase with eta_H = -3 - 2 nu_II (Eq. 2.13), epsilon_H evolves substantially and the approximation is least controlled, yet Eq. (3.37) predicts a divergent (1 - alpha)^{-2} enhancement. The authors call the divergence an artifact of the approximation in the conclusion, but the figures (e.g., Fig. 10) present the enhancement as a quantitative result. Please provide a quantitative error budget, for example by comparing Eq. (3.22) with a numerical solution that retains the full H(t) evolution for representative parameters including |alpha - 1| << 1.
  3. [Section 4 (first paragraph) vs. Section 4.3 (Eq. 4.29)] The delta-N procedure is introduced 'under the assumption that the scalar field perturbation can still be treated in linear theory until n = n_attr', but Section 4.3 concludes that the superhorizon evolution of delta-phi is actually highly nonlinear when the potential has a sharp feature, as made explicit in Eq. (4.29). These statements appear contradictory. If the nonlinear mapping is absorbed into the delta-N formulas, the authors should state clearly that Gaussianity of delta-phi is assumed only at the initial flat-slice epoch and explain how the Gaussian-variance formula (4.24) follows under that condition. This clarification is needed for the validity of the PDF (4.23) and the PBH discussion in Section 5.
  4. [Section 3.2 and Figs. 5-16 (numerical substantiation)] The paper repeatedly claims that the analytic results 'match' the numerical integration, e.g., 'we find it matches the result obtained by numerically solving the perturbation equations very well' after Eq. (3.22), and 'a good fit with the numerical results' in Section 3.3. However, these comparisons are qualitative: the figures show curves without error bars or residuals, and no code is released. For a paper whose central claim is a complete analytic description, please either release the numerical code or provide a quantitative discrepancy measure (e.g., maximum relative difference between Eq. (3.22) and the numerical spectrum over the plotted k range) for each figure.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] There are several typos: 'supper Hubble' in the abstract, 'unities' for 'units' in Section 2, 'ξ2/ξ2' in Section 3.3, 'donimates' in Section 3.3, and 'Press-Schetcher' in Section 5. These should be corrected.
  2. [Equations (4.18) vs. (4.19) in Section 4.2] The formulas for Case B and Case C differ only in the sign convention for the field displacement; it would help the reader if the authors explicitly state the sign convention for delta-phi (positive toward larger phi) and whether the left/right sides of the vertical red line in Fig. 15 correspond to this convention.
  3. [References] The paper relies on the logarithmic duality from Ref. [82] but does not include a short derivation of Eq. (4.4) for the reader; a pointer to the relevant appendix in [82] would improve readability.
  4. [Data availability] No data availability statement is included. For a computational cosmology journal, the authors should state whether the numerical codes used for Figs. 5-16 are available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the alpha parameter and the (1-alpha)^-2 enhancement are derived from potential parameters and matching conditions, not fitted, and the delta-N machinery is recapitulated and numerically checked.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Eq. (2.15) defines alpha purely from the potential parameters (epsilon_I, epsilon_II, eta_I, eta_II) before any spectrum is computed, and the (1-alpha)^-2 amplitude in Eqs. (3.22), (3.36), and (3.37) follows from the matched background coefficients C_II,- and the attractor piece of z_II, so no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The power-spectrum formulas are obtained by solving the linear perturbation equation with matching conditions and are compared with direct numerical solutions (fig. 5). The delta-N / logarithmic-duality formulas in Sec. 4.1 are recapitulated from [82] (which has author overlap), but they are rederived algebraically from the background solution (2.7) in Eqs. (4.1)-(4.6) and checked numerically in Sec. 4.2, so the citation is not load-bearing. The conservation discussion cites [83] but also gives an explicit demonstration via Eq. (4.29). The stated assumption that 'the end of inflation is in the attractor phase' (Sec. 2) is a genuine applicability condition: for alpha > 1, if inflation ends before attractor relaxation, the late-time limit (3.22) would not be the observable spectrum. Because the paper states this limitation explicitly and does not use it to define the result, it weakens completeness but does not make the derivation circular. I find no step in which a prediction reduces by construction to an input or to a self-citation whose content is unverified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are derived from a small set of model inputs and prior formulas; no data fitting or new entities. The main fragility is the attractor-end assumption and the borrowed delta-N machinery.

free parameters (2)
  • eta_I = 5/12 (nu_I = 1) = 5/12
    Hand-chosen in Sec. 3.3 to make the next-to-leading-order indices in the k/k_star expansion coincide, producing the advertised k^5(log k)^2 growth. This is an illustrative fine-tuning, not a fit to data.
  • eta_II near the alpha = 1 critical value = eta_II approx (nu_I + 3/2) R_epsilon for |eta_II| << 1
    Chosen to realize the infinitely long ultra-slow-roll-like phase in Sec. 2; the authors note this is unstable and in reality only gives a long relaxation phase.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Constant-H slow-roll background: epsilon_H << 1 and H^2 approx V_star/3 through the transition.
    Invoked in Eqs. (2.6) and (3.12); it turns the mode equation into a constant-coefficient Bessel form whose analytic solution is the backbone of the paper. It fails for large epsilon_H or very long non-attractor phases.
  • domain assumption Real characteristic exponents: eta_X < 3/4 in both stages.
    Stated after Eq. (2.6); excludes oscillatory inflaton trajectories and keeps the two exponential solutions real and distinct.
  • domain assumption First-stage attractor initial condition: C_{I,+} = 0 before the transition.
    Set after Eq. (2.10); fixes pi_star at the junction and makes the parameter alpha the sole measure of the off-attractor component in stage II.
  • domain assumption Inflation ends in the second-stage attractor phase.
    Stated in Sec. 2; the final spectrum is evaluated in the limit -k tau -> 0 assuming the attractor is reached. For alpha > 1 the field overshoots and makes a U-turn, so an unspecified mechanism is needed to end inflation.
  • domain assumption Linear evolution of delta-phi until n_attr in the delta-N prescription.
    Assumed in Sec. 4 so that delta-N can be evaluated by backward evolution from the late attractor; Sec. 4.3 argues the actual superhorizon delta-phi evolution is nonlinear, so this prescription is the delicate bridge between the two.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic vacuum initial condition: D_I = 0.
    Used from Eq. (3.16) onward for the main spectrum; the non-adiabatic alpha-vacuum case is explicitly left to future work, so the k^5(log k)^2 statement is restricted to the adiabatic vacuum.
  • domain assumption Pi-Sasaki logarithmic duality formulas from [82].
    The delta-N expressions (4.1)-(4.12) are taken from [82] rather than re-derived; [82] has an overlapping author (Sasaki), so it is prior self-cited machinery.
  • domain assumption Press-Schechter with linear delta = (4/9) R for primordial black hole abundance.
    Adopted in Sec. 5 for simplicity; ignores nonlinear threshold effects and makes the primordial black hole section an estimate rather than a prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A complete analysis of inflation with piecewise quadratic potential." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KIB36N77

@misc{pith2026241216463,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A complete analysis of inflation with piecewise quadratic potential},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KIB36N77}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16463}
}
abstract

We conduct a thorough study of the comoving curvature perturbation $\mathcal{R}$ in single-field inflation with two stages, represented by a piecewise quadratic potential, where both the first and second derivatives are allowed to be discontinuous at the transition point. We calculate the evolution of $\mathcal{R}$ by combining the perturbative and non-perturbative methods consistently, and obtain the power spectrum and the non-Gaussian features in the probability distribution function. We find that both the spectrum and the statistics of $\mathcal{R}$ depend significantly on the second derivatives of the potential at both the first and second stages. Furthermore, we find a new parameter constructed from the potential parameters, which we call $\alpha$, plays a decisive role in determining various features in the spectrum such as the amplitude, the slope, and the existence of a dip. In particular, we recover the typical $k^4$ growth of the spectrum in most cases, but the maximum growth rate of $k^5(\log k)^2$ can be obtained by fine-tuning the parameters. Then, using the $\delta N$ formalism valid on superhorizon scales, we give fully nonlinear formulas for $\cal{R}$ in terms of the scalar field perturbation $\delta\phi$ and its time derivative. In passing, we point out the importance of the nonlinear evolution of $\delta\phi$ on superhorizon scales. Finally, using the Press-Schechter formalism for simplicity, we discuss the effect of the non-Gaussian tails of the probability distribution function on the primordial black hole formation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How deep is the dip and how tall are the wiggles in inflationary power spectra?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In single-field PBH inflation models, a power-spectrum dip appears precisely when the inflaton velocity does not flip sign, and the peak amplitude scales as the inverse square of the dip amplitude.

  2. Superhorizon curvature perturbations in hybrid inflation revisited

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hybrid inflation's waterfall tachyonic instability grows isocurvature modes that convert to curvature perturbations at the field-space turn, yielding a k^{3}-peaked spectrum with always-positive f_NL that enhances PBH...

  3. Evolution of Linear Perturbations under Time-Dependent Hubble Friction I: SR-USR-SR Inflation

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Analytic asymptotics show the dip in the SR-USR-SR curvature power spectrum comes from cancellation between two growing modes, not a constant-versus-growing cancellation.

  4. $\delta n$ formalism: A new formulation for the probability density of the curvature perturbation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A reformulation of the δN formalism that counts e-folds forward and exploits the superhorizon correlation between field and velocity to express the curvature perturbation PDF as a one-dimensional change of variables.

  5. Primordial Black Hole Formation from the Upward Step Model: Avoiding Overproduction

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In upward-step inflation, a non-Gaussian cutoff in curvature perturbations sharply suppresses type-I primordial black hole abundance for h above about 5.9, easing PTA overproduction constraints.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [73]

    Carrilho, K.A

    P. Carrilho, K.A. Malik and D.J. Mulryne, Dissecting the growth of the power spectrum for primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 103529 [ 1907.05237]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [36]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Zhou, Highly non-Gaussian tails and primordial black holes from single-field inflation , JCAP 12 (2022) 034 [ 2207.11910]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [79]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Zhou, One small step for an inflaton, one giant leap for inflation: A novel non-Gaussian tail and primordial black holes, Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137461 [ 2112.13836]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [1]

    Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys

    A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

    1981

  5. [2]

    Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99. – 35 –

    1980

  6. [3]

    Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys

    A.D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389

    1982

  7. [4]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [ 1807.06211]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [5]

    Leach, M

    S.M. Leach, M. Sasaki, D. Wands and A.R. Liddle, Enhancement of superhorizon scale inflationary curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 023512 [astro-ph/0101406]

    arXiv 2001

Show all 103 references
  1. [6]

    Byrnes, P.S

    C.T. Byrnes, P.S. Cole and S.P. Patil, Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes , JCAP 06 (2019) 028 [ 1811.11158]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [7]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, On the slope of the curvature power spectrum in non-attractor inflation, JCAP 04 (2020) 048 [ 1912.01061]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Dalianis, A

    I. Dalianis, A. Kehagias and G. Tringas, Primordial black holes from α-attractors, JCAP 01 (2019) 037 [ 1805.09483]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Garcia-Bellido and E

    J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation, Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 47 [ 1702.03901]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation , Prog. Theor. Phys. 99 (1998) 763 [ gr-qc/9801017]

    1998 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Garcia-Bellido, A.D

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A.D. Linde and D. Wands, Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid inflation , Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 6040 [ astro-ph/9605094]

    1996 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Kawasaki, N

    M. Kawasaki, N. Sugiyama and T. Yanagida, Primordial black hole formation in a double inflation model in supergravity , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6050 [ hep-ph/9710259]

    1998 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Frampton, M

    P.H. Frampton, M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi and T.T. Yanagida, Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter , JCAP 04 (2010) 023 [ 1001.2308]

    2010 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Giovannini, Secondary graviton spectra and waterfall-like fields , Phys

    M. Giovannini, Secondary graviton spectra and waterfall-like fields , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083523 [ 1008.1164]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido,Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 023524 [ 1501.07565]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, Y. Tada and T.T. Yanagida, Inflationary Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 043504 [1701.02544]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Gordon, D

    C. Gordon, D. Wands, B.A. Bassett and R. Maartens, Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 023506 [ astro-ph/0009131]

    2000 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Anguelova, On Primordial Black Holes from Rapid Turns in Two-field Models , JCAP 06 (2021) 004 [ 2012.03705]

    L. Anguelova, On Primordial Black Holes from Rapid Turns in Two-field Models , JCAP 06 (2021) 004 [ 2012.03705]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Bhattacharya and I

    S. Bhattacharya and I. Zavala, Sharp turns in axion monodromy: primordial black holes and gravitational waves , JCAP 04 (2023) 065 [ 2205.06065]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Braglia, D.K

    M. Braglia, D.K. Hazra, F. Finelli, G.F. Smoot, L. Sriramkumar and A.A. Starobinsky, Generating PBHs and small-scale GWs in two-field models of inflation , JCAP 08 (2020) 001 [2005.02895]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [21]

    Braglia, D.K

    M. Braglia, D.K. Hazra, L. Sriramkumar and F. Finelli, Generating primordial features at large scales in two field models of inflation , JCAP 08 (2020) 025 [ 2004.00672]. – 36 –

    2020 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Y. Ema, K. Mukaida and J. van de Vis, Higgs inflation as nonlinear sigma model and scalaron as its σ-meson, JHEP 11 (2020) 011 [ 2002.11739]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, M. Sasaki and V. Takhistov, Analytic Description of Primordial Black Hole Formation from Scalar Field Fragmentation , JCAP 10 (2019) 077 [1907.10613]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Gundhi and C.F

    A. Gundhi and C.F. Steinwachs, Scalaron-Higgs inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 954 (2020) 114989 [1810.10546]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Christodoulidis and J.-O

    P. Christodoulidis and J.-O. Gong, Enhanced power spectra from multi-field inflation , 2311.04090

    arXiv

  21. [26]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida and T.T. Yanagida, Double inflation as a single origin of primordial black holes for all dark matter and LIGO observations , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 043514 [ 1711.06129]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [27]

    Fumagalli, S

    J. Fumagalli, S. Renaux-Petel, J.W. Ronayne and L.T. Witkowski, Turning in the landscape: A new mechanism for generating primordial black holes , Phys. Lett. B 841 (2023) 137921 [ 2004.08369]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [28]

    R.-G. Cai, C. Chen and C. Fu, Primordial black holes and stochastic gravitational wave background from inflation with a noncanonical spectator field , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 083537 [2108.03422]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [29]

    D.-S. Meng, C. Yuan and Q.-G. Huang, Primordial black holes generated by the non-minimal spectator field , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66 (2023) 280411 [2212.03577]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello and A. Papageorgiou, A novel PBH production mechanism from non-Abelian gauge fields during inflation , 2403.13581

    arXiv

  26. [31]

    Qin, S.R

    W. Qin, S.R. Geller, S. Balaji, E. McDonough and D.I. Kaiser, Planck constraints and gravitational wave forecasts for primordial black hole dark matter seeded by multifield inflation, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043508 [ 2303.02168]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Pi, Y.-l

    S. Pi, Y.-l. Zhang, Q.-G. Huang and M. Sasaki, Scalaron from R2-gravity as a heavy field, JCAP 05 (2018) 042 [ 1712.09896]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Wang, Y.-l

    X. Wang, Y.-l. Zhang and M. Sasaki, Enhanced curvature perturbation and primordial black hole formation in two-stage inflation with a break , JCAP 07 (2024) 076 [2404.02492]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [34]

    Dom` enech, G

    G. Dom` enech, G. Vargas and T. Vargas,An exact model for enhancing/suppressing primordial fluctuations, 2309.05750

    arXiv

  30. [35]

    Pi and J

    S. Pi and J. Wang, Primordial black hole formation in Starobinsky’s linear potential model, JCAP 06 (2023) 018 [ 2209.14183]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Ragavendra, P

    H.V. Ragavendra, P. Saha, L. Sriramkumar and J. Silk, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctuated inflation , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 083510 [ 2008.12202]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [38]

    C. Fu, P. Wu and H. Yu, Primordial black holes and oscillating gravitational waves in – 37 – slow-roll and slow-climb inflation with an intermediate noninflationary phase , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 043527 [ 2006.03768]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Liu, Z.-K

    J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo and R.-G. Cai, Analytical approximation of the scalar spectrum in the ultraslow-roll inflationary models , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083535 [ 2003.02075]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Bhaumik and R.K

    N. Bhaumik and R.K. Jain, Primordial black holes dark matter from inflection point models of inflation and the effects of reheating , JCAP 01 (2020) 037 [ 1907.04125]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Mishra and V

    S.S. Mishra and V. Sahni, Primordial Black Holes from a tiny bump/dip in the Inflaton potential, JCAP 04 (2020) 007 [ 1911.00057]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Garcia-Bellido, M

    J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso and C. Unal, Gravitational waves at interferometer scales and primordial black holes in axion inflation , JCAP 12 (2016) 031 [ 1610.03763]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Yokoyama, Chaotic new inflation and formation of primordial black holes , Phys

    J. Yokoyama, Chaotic new inflation and formation of primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 083510 [ astro-ph/9802357]

    1998 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky and I. Novikov, Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7173

    1994

  39. [45]

    Starobinsky, Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential , JETP Lett

    A.A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential , JETP Lett. 55 (1992) 489

    1992

  40. [46]

    Di and Y

    H. Di and Y. Gong, Primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from ultra-slow-roll inflation, JCAP 07 (2018) 007 [ 1707.09578]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [47]

    R. Zhai, H. Yu and P. Wu, Growth of power spectrum due to decrease of sound speed during inflation , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 023517 [ 2207.12745]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Balaji, J

    S. Balaji, J. Silk and Y.-P. Wu, Induced gravitational waves from the cosmic coincidence , JCAP 06 (2022) 008 [ 2202.00700]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Choudhury, A

    S. Choudhury, A. Karde, S. Panda and M. Sami, Realisation of the ultra-slow roll phase in Galileon inflation and PBH overproduction , 2401.10925

    arXiv

  44. [50]

    Choudhury, A

    S. Choudhury, A. Karde, S. Panda and M. Sami, Scalar induced gravity waves from ultra slow-roll Galileon inflation , 2308.09273

    arXiv

  45. [51]

    Caravano, K

    A. Caravano, K. Inomata and S. Renaux-Petel, The Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Non-Perturbative Dynamics From Small-Scale Features, 2403.12811

    arXiv

  46. [52]

    Y. Cai, M. Zhu and Y.-S. Piao, Primordial Black Holes from Null Energy Condition Violation during Inflation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 021001 [ 2305.10933]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Karam, T

    A. Karam, T. Pappas and K. Tamvakis, Nonminimal Coleman–Weinberg Inflation with an R2 term, JCAP 02 (2019) 006 [ 1810.12884]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [54]

    C. Fu, P. Wu and H. Yu, Primordial Black Holes from Inflation with Nonminimal Derivative Coupling , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 063532 [ 1907.05042]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [55]

    Gundhi, S.V

    A. Gundhi, S.V. Ketov and C.F. Steinwachs, Primordial black hole dark matter in dilaton-extended two-field Starobinsky inflation , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 083518 [2011.05999]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Frolovsky, S.V

    D. Frolovsky, S.V. Ketov and S. Saburov, Formation of primordial black holes after Starobinsky inflation, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 37 (2022) 2250135 [ 2205.00603]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [57]

    Aldabergenov, A

    Y. Aldabergenov, A. Addazi and S.V. Ketov, Primordial black holes from modified supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 917 [ 2006.16641]. – 38 –

    2020 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Karydas, E

    S. Karydas, E. Papantonopoulos and E.N. Saridakis, Successful Higgs inflation from combined nonminimal and derivative couplings , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023530 [2102.08450]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [59]

    Canko, I.D

    D.D. Canko, I.D. Gialamas and G.P. Kodaxis, A simple F (R, ϕ) deformation of Starobinsky inflationary model , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 458 [ 1901.06296]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [60]

    P. Chen, S. Koh and G. Tumurtushaa, Primordial black holes and induced gravitational waves from inflation in the Horndeski theory of gravity , 2107.08638

    arXiv

  55. [61]

    Kawai and J

    S. Kawai and J. Kim, Primordial black holes from Gauss-Bonnet-corrected single field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 083545 [ 2108.01340]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [62]

    Zhang, Primordial black holes and scalar induced gravitational waves from the E model with a Gauss-Bonnet term , Phys

    F. Zhang, Primordial black holes and scalar induced gravitational waves from the E model with a Gauss-Bonnet term , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 063539 [ 2112.10516]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Yi, Primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves from the generalized Brans-Dicke theory, JCAP 03 (2023) 048 [ 2206.01039]

    Z. Yi, Primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves from the generalized Brans-Dicke theory, JCAP 03 (2023) 048 [ 2206.01039]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [64]

    J. Lin, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Lu, C. Zhang and F. Zhang, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from k and G inflation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 103515 [2001.05909]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Z. Yi, Q. Gao, Y. Gong and Z.-h. Zhu, Primordial black holes and scalar-induced secondary gravitational waves from inflationary models with a noncanonical kinetic term , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 063534 [ 2011.10606]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Z. Yi, Y. Gong, B. Wang and Z.-h. Zhu, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from the Higgs field , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 063535 [ 2007.09957]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [67]

    Gao, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from chaotic inflation , Sci

    Q. Gao, Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from chaotic inflation , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 (2021) 280411 [ 2102.07369]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [68]

    J. Lin, S. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Lu, Z. Wang and F. Zhang, Primordial black holes and scalar induced gravitational waves from Higgs inflation with noncanonical kinetic term , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 043517 [ 2111.01362]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Beltran Jimenez and M. Pieroni, Black hole formation from a general quadratic action for inflationary primordial fluctuations , JCAP 06 (2019) 016 [1811.03065]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Heydari and K

    S. Heydari and K. Karami, Primordial black holes in nonminimal derivative coupling inflation with quartic potential and reheating consideration , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 83 [2107.10550]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Solbi and K

    M. Solbi and K. Karami, Primordial black holes and induced gravitational waves in k-inflation, JCAP 08 (2021) 056 [ 2102.05651]

    2021 arXiv

  66. [72]

    Teimoori, K

    Z. Teimoori, K. Rezazadeh, M.A. Rasheed and K. Karami, Mechanism of primordial black holes production and secondary gravitational waves in α-attractor Galileon inflationary scenario, JCAP 10 (2021) [ 2107.07620]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Jackson, H

    J.H.P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, A.D. Gow, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands, The separate-universe approach and sudden transitions during inflation , JCAP 05 (2024) 053 [2311.03281]. – 39 –

    2024 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Y.-F. Cai, X. Chen, M.H. Namjoo, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Wang, Revisiting non-Gaussianity from non-attractor inflation models , JCAP 05 (2018) 012 [1712.09998]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Biagetti, G

    M. Biagetti, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion , JCAP 07 (2018) 032 [ 1804.07124]

    2018 arXiv

  70. [77]

    V. Atal, J. Cid, A. Escriv` a and J. Garriga, PBH in single field inflation: the effect of shape dispersion and non-Gaussianities , JCAP 05 (2020) 022 [ 1908.11357]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [78]

    V. Atal, J. Garriga and A. Marcos-Caballero, Primordial black hole formation with non-Gaussian curvature perturbations, JCAP 09 (2019) 073 [ 1905.13202]

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Cielo, G

    M. Cielo, G. Mangano, O. Pisanti and D. Wands, Steepest Growth in the Primordial Power Spectrum from Excited States at a Sudden Transition , 2410.22154

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Artigas, S

    D. Artigas, S. Pi and T. Tanaka, Extended δN formalism, 2408.09964

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Pi and M

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Logarithmic Duality of the Curvature Perturbation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 011002 [ 2211.13932]

    2023 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Lyth, K.A

    D.H. Lyth, K.A. Malik and M. Sasaki, A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, JCAP 05 (2005) 004 [ astro-ph/0411220]

    2005 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 221003 [ 2211.03395]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, Note on the bispectrum and one-loop corrections in single-field inflation with primordial black hole formation , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 103541 [2303.00341]

    2024 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, Comparing sharp and smooth transitions of the second slow-roll parameter in single-field inflation , JCAP 10 (2024) 036 [ 2405.12145]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Inomata, Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections, Phys

    K. Inomata, Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 141001 [ 2403.04682]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Riotto, The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out, 2301.00599

    A. Riotto, The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out, 2301.00599

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    Choudhury, M.R

    S. Choudhury, M.R. Gangopadhyay and M. Sami, No-go for the formation of heavy mass Primordial Black Holes in Single Field Inflation , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 884 [2301.10000]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Riotto, The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Still Not Ruled Out, 2303.01727

    A. Riotto, The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Still Not Ruled Out, 2303.01727

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Firouzjahi, One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation , JCAP 10 (2023) 006 [ 2303.12025]

    H. Firouzjahi, One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation , JCAP 10 (2023) 006 [ 2303.12025]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., M. Taoso and A. Urbano, Perturbativity in the presence of ultraslow-roll dynamics , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 123550 [ 2305.03491]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Tasinato, Large —η— approach to single field inflation , Phys

    G. Tasinato, Large —η— approach to single field inflation , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043526 [2305.11568]. – 40 –

    2023 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Cheng, D.-S

    S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee and K.-W. Ng, Primordial perturbations from ultra-slow-roll single-field inflation with quantum loop effects , JCAP 03 (2024) 008 [ 2305.16810]

    2024

  87. [95]

    Fumagalli, Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics , 2305.19263

    J. Fumagalli, Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics , 2305.19263

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    Maity, H.V

    S. Maity, H.V. Ragavendra, S.K. Sethi and L. Sriramkumar, Loop contributions to the scalar power spectrum due to quartic order action in ultra slow roll inflation , JCAP 05 (2024) 046 [ 2307.13636]

    2024 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Y. Tada, T. Terada and J. Tokuda, Cancellation of quantum corrections on the soft curvature perturbations, JHEP 01 (2024) 105 [ 2308.04732]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Firouzjahi, Revisiting loop corrections in single field ultraslow-roll inflation , Phys

    H. Firouzjahi, Revisiting loop corrections in single field ultraslow-roll inflation , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043514 [ 2311.04080]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Davies, L

    M.W. Davies, L. Iacconi and D.J. Mulryne, Numerical 1-loop correction from a potential yielding ultra-slow-roll dynamics , JCAP 04 (2024) 050 [ 2312.05694]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Iacconi, D

    L. Iacconi, D. Mulryne and D. Seery, Loop corrections in the separate universe picture , JCAP 06 (2024) 062 [ 2312.12424]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Saburov and S.V

    S. Saburov and S.V. Ketov, Quantum Loop Corrections in the Modified Gravity Model of Starobinsky Inflation with Primordial Black Hole Production , Universe 10 (2024) 354 [2402.02934]

    2024 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Kawaguchi, S

    R. Kawaguchi, S. Tsujikawa and Y. Yamada, Proving the absence of large one-loop corrections to the power spectrum of curvature perturbations in transient ultra-slow-roll inflation within the path-integral approach , 2407.19742

    arXiv

  95. [103]

    Ballesteros and J.G

    G. Ballesteros and J.G. Egea, One-loop power spectrum in ultra slow-roll inflation and implications for primordial black hole dark matter , JCAP 07 (2024) 052 [ 2404.07196]. – 41 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.