REVIEW 4 cited by
The Road to Artificial SuperIntelligence: A Comprehensive Survey of Superalignment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has sparked discussion on Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), a hypothetical AI system that surpasses human intelligence. Although ASI remains hypothetical and far beyond current AI capabilities, discussing its potential and exploring its feasibility and potential risks is critical for the development of future AI systems. The idea of superalignment originates from scalable oversight, which studies how to supervise increasingly capable AI systems when direct human supervision becomes insufficient. In this paper, we focus on the superalignment problem: "The process of supervising, controlling, and governing artificial superintelligence." We first review scalable oversight paradigms-Sandwiching, Self-Enhancement, and Weak-to-Strong Generalization -- then analyze the limitations of current paradigms through the lens of possibility and impossibility, discuss key challenges, and propose pathways for the safe and continual improvement of future AI systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Playstyle and Artificial Intelligence: An Initial Blueprint Through the Lens of Video Games
This dissertation formalizes playstyle as the decision-making style of an agent, introduces a discrete-state playstyle distance that distinguishes behaviors in racing games and Atari, and proposes a blueprint for usin...
-
On Weak-to-Strong Generalization and f-Divergence
Replacing cross-entropy with f-divergence losses in weak-to-strong generalization gives modest accuracy gains and improved label-noise tolerance, though the paper's theoretical equivalence result is constructed after ...
-
Contrastive Weak-to-strong Generalization
Contrastive decoding between pre- and post-alignment weak models generates better supervision samples, improving weak-to-strong generalization on AlpacaEval2 and Arena-Hard.
-
\texttt{R$^\textbf{2}$AI}: Towards Resistant and Resilient AI in an Evolving World
The paper introduces safe-by-coevolution and the R2AI architecture as a proactive, immune-inspired approach to continual AI safety.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.