Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 30 references

Three-dimensional nucleation and growth of deformation twins in magnesium

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read First 3D in-situ microscopy inside a bulk grain shows deformation twins nucleate at triple junctions, grow irregularly in several directions at once, and pile up dislocations at twin-grain junctions.

desk verdict A genuinely new 3D in-situ DFXM dataset of deformation twinning in a bulk Mg grain, with solid descriptive observations on irregular growth and GND accumulation; the triple-junction variant-selection story is post-hoc and underpowered, but the measurements stand on their own. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16640 v1 pith:JVZTRUSN submitted 2024-12-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sangwon Lee , Michael Pilipchuk , Can Yildirim , Duncan Greeley , Qianying Shi , Tracy D. Berman , Adam Creuziger , Evan Rust
show 4 more authors
Carsten Detlefs Veera Sundararaghavan John E. Allison Ashley Bucsek
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords deformationtwinningmagnesiumalloysdark-fieldX-raymicroscopyin-situ3Dcharacterizationtriplejunctionstwingrowthgeometricallynecessarydislocationscrystalplasticityfiniteelementanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Deformation twins—three-dimensional crystal domains that form under stress—give magnesium alloys both extra ductility and a tendency to crack. This paper reports the first 3D in-situ characterization of twinning inside an embedded bulk grain, achieved with dark-field X-ray microscopy at sub-micron resolution and 0.001° angular resolution, supported by crystal plasticity finite element simulations. All three observed {10-12} extension twins intersect triple junctions of the grain network, and each twin plane lies parallel to the triple junction line it meets; the authors argue this geometric alignment, not just the Schmid factor, helps select which twin variant nucleates. The twins grow as irregular ellipsoids and can grow simultaneously in the lateral, shear, and plane-normal directions, and geometrically necessary dislocations accumulate most strongly at twin-grain junctions—a direct in-situ observation of a known precursor to crack initiation. If correct, this gives the first direct 3D view of twin nucleation and growth in a bulk metal and identifies twin junctions as the sites where cracks are most likely to start.

What carries the argument

The central tool is dark-field X-ray microscopy (DFXM), which images a sub-surface grain in the diffraction condition with roughly 212 nm spatial resolution and about 0.001° angular resolution, enabling 3D maps of twin morphology and of local orientation gradients (kernel average misorientation, intragranular misorientation, and geometrically necessary dislocation density) inside a bulk polycrystal. The twin-local coordinate system—plane normal $k_1$, shear direction $\eta_1$, and lateral direction $\lambda = k_1 \times \eta_1$—organizes the growth analysis. Crystal plasticity finite element simulations supply the stress and backstress fields used to interpret nucleation at triple junctions and the stalling of lateral growth.

What would settle it

A larger-scale 3D survey of many embedded grains, counting how often the nucleated twin plane is parallel to the triple junction segment it intersects, would settle the claim: if this fraction does not significantly exceed the chance fraction of all twin planes through a grain that happen to be parallel to some triple junction segment, the triple-junction selection rule would be refuted. A complementary check is direct in-situ observation of a twin nucleating at a triple junction from an initially untwinned state, rather than inferring nucleation after the fact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports the first 3D, sub-micron, in-situ observations of deformation twinning inside an embedded bulk grain of a Mg-4Al alloy, made with dark-field X-ray microscopy while the sample was under uniaxial tension. Three {10-12} extension twins were followed from near-nucleation at 0.6 MPa to 45 MPa. Each of the three twins intersects a triple junction segment, and in each case the twin plane $k_1$ is parallel to the triple junction line it intersects; the authors propose this geometric alignment favors those twin variants, even though the three observed variants had the lowest Schmid factors of the six available. The 3D shapes are irregular ellipsoids with longest axis in the twin lateral direction $\lambda = k_1 \times \eta_1$, intermediate axis in the shear direction $\eta_1$, and shortest axis in the plane-normal direction $k_1$; growth along $\lambda$ can persist into later stages and can occur simultaneously with growth along $\eta_1$ and coarsening along $k_1$. Orientation-gradient mapping shows geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs) accumulate most densely at twin-grain junctions, moderately at twin-twin junctions, and weakly along twin planes, with kernel average misorientation increasing from roughly 0.1° to 0.5° as load increases—providing the first direct experimental link between twin junctions and the dislocation accumulation that precedes crack initiation.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that triple junction geometry drives twin variant selection rests on just three twins in one grain, with the first twin already present at the initial measurement, so the observed alignment of twin planes with triple junction lines could still be coincidence rather than causation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Twin variant selection in hcp metals may be influenced by the three-dimensional geometry of the grain network, specifically the alignment of the twin plane with triple junction lines, rather than by Schmid factor alone.
  • Twin growth cannot be captured by a single advancing front: lateral expansion, shear-direction propagation, and plane-normal coarsening can occur simultaneously and intermittently, with backstresses locally stalling growth.
  • Twin-grain junctions are experimentally shown to be the sites of highest geometrically necessary dislocation accumulation, providing a concrete microstructural marker for where crack initiation is most likely in twinning materials.
  • The sub-degree orientation gradients at twin junctions are below the resolution of conventional electron-backscatter diffraction, so high-angular-resolution 3D methods are needed to detect these crack-initiation precursors.
  • Crystal-plasticity-predicted backstresses are negative near the growing twin and positive near grain boundaries, offering a mechanism for the observed sequence of lateral stalling followed by new twin formation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the triple-junction alignment rule holds more generally, then controlling the grain-boundary network through processing could become a lever for suppressing unfavorable twin variants and the crack initiation they promote.
  • The three-twin sample is too small to establish the rule statistically; a natural next experiment is a 3D survey of many grains, checking whether the nucleated twin plane is parallel to its intersecting triple junction more often than chance.
  • The observation that dislocations accumulate at twin-grain junctions while barely appearing at triple junctions suggests crack initiation in twinned magnesium is driven more by twin-grain incompatibility than by the triple-junction stress concentration itself, a distinction that could refine fatigue-life models.
  • The same dark-field X-ray microscopy approach could be applied to titanium, zirconium, or twinning-induced-plasticity steels to test whether triple-junction-aligned nucleation and twin-junction dislocation accumulation are general mechanisms across twinning materials.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports in-situ dark-field X-ray microscopy (DFXM) measurements of deformation twinning inside a single embedded grain of a bulk Mg-4Al polycrystal, with supporting crystal plasticity finite element simulations. The authors observe three {10-12} extension twins, characterize their 3D shapes and growth in lateral, shear, and plane-normal directions, and map intragranular orientation gradients to infer geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) accumulation at twin-grain and twin-twin junctions. They further propose that triple junction geometry influences twin variant selection, and they claim to present the first 3D in-situ characterization of deformation twinning inside an embedded grain over mesoscopic fields of view. The paper includes substantial experimental data and publicly available processed and raw datasets.

Significance. If the results hold, the DFXM approach provides a valuable new capability for observing sub-surface twin evolution with sub-micron resolution, and the observations of irregular 3D twin growth and GND accumulation at twin junctions are informative for understanding twinning in magnesium. However, the central mechanistic claim that triple junction geometry selects twin variants rests on three retrospectively identified twins in a single grain, with no null model, and the 'first 3D in-situ' framing is contradicted by the paper's own citations of prior 3D in-situ HEDM studies. The paper's strength is in the descriptive 3D measurements and the public availability of data; its weakness is the statistical and logical support for the variant-selection conclusion.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction (first paragraph, refs. 15-16)] The abstract and Conclusions state that this is the 'first 3D in-situ characterization of deformation twinning inside an embedded grain over mesoscopic fields of view.' However, the manuscript itself cites Lind et al. (ref. 15) and Abdolvand et al. (ref. 16), both of which used in-situ 3D HEDM to study twinning in bulk polycrystals. As written, the novelty claim is contradicted by the paper's own references. The claim should be qualified, for example, as the first 3D in-situ characterization with sub-micron spatial resolution, or the first DFXM study of twinning, rather than the first 3D in-situ study.
  2. [Results and Discussion, Twin Nucleation, Figs. 1F-H and S7] The variant-selection test is circular. The authors state that they measured the triple junction intersection area for each of the six variants 'had they nucleated anywhere in the grain,' but the locations used are the same three locations where the observed twins intersect triple junctions. Because the observed twins were used to identify the locations, the calculation cannot provide independent evidence for the hypothesis. A proper test would pre-specify candidate nucleation sites (e.g., all triple junction segments in the grain) and ask which variants have maximum intersection area at those sites without using the observed twin positions, or it would test against a null model of random variant selection over the actual labDCT grain map.
  3. [Results and Discussion, Twin Nucleation, Table S1 and Fig. S7] The quantitative support is underpowered. With only three observed twins in one grain, the fact that all three have the lowest Schmid factors among the six variants has a combinatorial probability of 1/C(6,3)=1/20 under uniform random selection, which is not a strong rejection of chance, and no confidence interval or null model is provided for the claimed geometric alignment between twin planes and triple junction lines. The sample size (n=3) and the post-hoc nature of the analysis preclude a statistically meaningful conclusion about variant selection.
  4. [Results and Discussion, Twin Nucleation, Fig. 1C] The first twin was not directly observed to nucleate. The red twin was already present at the initial 0.6 MPa load step and its nucleation is inferred to have occurred during sample mounting. This inference weakens the claim of 'directly observing the emergence and evolution of deformation twins' and should be stated as a limitation in the main text, not only as an aside. The claim that all three twins intersect triple junctions is also affected because the initial twin's nucleation site is inferred, not observed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Twinning and Dislocation Accumulation, Fig. 3G-I] The text says 'it intensifies between 30 MPa (Fig. 3G) and 40 MPa (Fig. 3I),' but the figure panels are labelled 0.6, 30, and 45 MPa; this is likely a typo and should be corrected.
  2. [Twinning and Dislocation Accumulation] The GND density calculation depends on the kernel size (stated as 5 μm) and on an inversion regularization that is not described in the main text. Please specify the inversion method and regularization parameters, or refer to the supplementary information with an equation, so readers can assess the quantitative GND values.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'a necessary precursor to crack initiation' is used in both the abstract and the conclusions to describe GND accumulation; since crack initiation was not observed in this study, a more hedged phrasing such as 'a precursor to crack initiation' would be more accurate.
  4. [Twin Growth] The description of growth directions is clear, but the observation that 'growth in the lateral direction can persist to later stages' is based on only three twins; the authors should note explicitly that this is a limited sampling and not a general statement about all twins.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The triple-junction variant-selection 'test' reduces to the geometric observation it is meant to support.

  1. self definitional [Results and Discussion, Twin Nucleation section, last paragraph]
    "To test this hypothesis, we measured the triple junction length that would be intersected by each of the six {1012}-type variants had they nucleated anywhere in the grain. The results (Fig. S7) show that the maximum possible triple junction intersection areas are the three variants that we observed, nucleated at the three locations we observed."

    The hypothesis being tested is defined by the immediately preceding observation that 'all three twin planes are geometrically aligned with triple junction segments, i.e., each twin plane lies parallel to the triple junction line segment that it intersects.' For a plane and a line segment, the plane-line intersection is maximal exactly when the line lies in the plane — which is precisely the stated condition of being parallel to and intersecting the line. The metric 'triple junction intersection area' is therefore maximized by construction for any twin variant whose plane contains the observed triple junction segment.

full rationale

The paper's strongest mechanistic claim is that triple-junction geometry influences twin variant selection, supported by the observation that all three observed twins intersect triple junctions with their twin planes parallel to the junction lines. The subsequent 'test' using maximum possible triple junction intersection areas is circular: the metric is defined so that a twin plane parallel to and intersecting a triple junction line automatically achieves the maximum possible intersection length. Thus the agreement between the computed maxima and the observed variants is guaranteed by the prior alignment observation, not independently established. The descriptive 3D twin-growth observations and GND accumulation measurements are not circular and appear self-contained, and the DFXM methodology is supported by external references rather than self-citation chains. However, the variant-selection test is central to the nucleation claim and reduces by construction to the input observation, giving a partial circularity score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are limited to analysis choices (KAM kernel size) and an unstated GND inversion procedure. The central observational claims do not depend on fitted parameters, but the triple junction variant-selection test is retrospective and uses the same three twins that motivated the hypothesis, which introduces circularity rather than new parameters. The main axioms are standard for DFXM and GND analyses, plus a modeling assumption about CPFE parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • KAM kernel size = 5 μm
    Hand-chosen size for kernel average misorientation calculation; affects the smoothness and localization of GND density maps. Not justified in the main text.
  • GND inversion regularization (unstated) = not reported
    The conversion from orientation gradients to GND density requires solving a rank-deficient Nye tensor inversion, which typically involves assumptions about active slip systems or regularization. These details are not in the main text, so any implicit choices are unverifiable.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFXM intensity centroids in tilt space map faithfully to local lattice orientation with 0.001° angular resolution and 212 nm spatial resolution, and the reconstructed 3D twin shapes are accurate representations of the underlying twin domains.
    The entire twin morphology and growth analysis in Figures 1 and 2 relies on this calibration; cited from prior DFXM papers (refs 18-21).
  • domain assumption Measured intragranular orientation gradients are attributable primarily to geometrically necessary dislocations, with negligible contributions from elastic strain gradients or measurement noise.
    Used to compute GND density in Figures 3J-L and 4J-L; the Nye tensor inversion is standard but assumes dislocation-induced rotation only.
  • domain assumption The PRISMS-Plasticity crystal plasticity model with its constitutive parameters captures the stress concentrations at triple junctions and the backstress fields around twins.
    CPFE simulations are used to support the claims about triple junction stress and backstress; the parameters are likely from prior literature but are not shown in the main text.
  • ad hoc to paper The selected grain, oriented with its c-axis near the loading direction, is representative of twinning behavior in Mg-4Al and the three observed twins are a sufficient sample to infer general twin nucleation and growth mechanisms.
    The grain was pre-selected for maximum twinning Schmid factor, and conclusions about triple junction variant selection and GND accumulation generalize from a single grain with three twins.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional nucleation and growth of deformation twins in magnesium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JVZTRUSN

@misc{pith2026241216640,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional nucleation and growth of deformation twins in magnesium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JVZTRUSN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16640}
}
read the original abstract

At two-thirds the weight of aluminum, magnesium alloys have the potential to significantly reduce the fuel consumption of transportation vehicles. These advancements depend on our ability to optimize the desirable versus undesirable effects of deformation twins: three dimensional (3D) microstructural domains that form under mechanical stresses. Previously only characterized using surface or thin-film measurements, here, we present the first 3D in-situ characterization of deformation twinning inside an embedded grain over mesoscopic fields of view using dark-field X-ray microscopy supported by crystal plasticity finite element analysis. The results reveal the important role of triple junctions on twin nucleation, that twin growth behavior is irregular and can occur in several directions simultaneously, and that twin-grain and twin-twin junctions are the sites of localized dislocation accumulation, a necessary precursor to crack initiation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16640 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. In-situ DFXM and 3D twin morphology measurements. (A) In-situ DFXM technique; (B) Grain of interest inside the grain network; (C−E) Evolution of the twin morphology inside the parent grain; F−H shows the parent grain (green; 50% transparency), the triple junctions (opaque; black), and the three twins (opaque; red, blue, and yellow). The load direction (LD) is also marked. The purple dashed lines in F−H highlight the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the growth behavior observed for the three twins relative to the twin plane normal (𝑘𝑘1), twin shear direction (𝜂𝜂1), and twin lateral direction (𝜆𝜆 = 𝑘𝑘1 × 𝜂𝜂1). In (11) , Liu et al used ex-situ EBSD statistical analysis on 2D twin shapes to suggest that twins grow faster along the lateral direction 𝜆𝜆 than along the twin shear direction 𝜂𝜂1 at the initial stages of twin growth, and that twins have irregular … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Evolution of local orientation gradients and GND density near the grain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of local orientation gradients and GND density in the grain interior. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. M. Pollock, Weight Loss with Magnesium Alloys. Science 328, 986–987 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Polmear, Light Alloys: From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals (Elsevier, 2005)

    I. Polmear, Light Alloys: From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals (Elsevier, 2005). 12

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    J. W. Christian, S. Mahajan, Deformation twinning. Progress in materials science 39, 1– 157 (1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    N. S. Prasad, N. N. Kumar, R. Narasimhan, S. Suwas, Fracture behavior of magnesium alloys–role of tensile twinning. Acta materialia 94, 281–293 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    L. Li, J. Yang, Z. Yang, Q. Sun, L. Tan, Q. Zeng, M. Zhu, Towards revealing the relationship between deformation twin and fatigue crack initiation in a rolled magnesium alloy. Materials Characterization 179, 111362 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Lentz, M

    M. Lentz, M. Risse, N. Schaefer, W. Reimers, I. Beyerlein, Strength and ductility with {10͞11}—{10͞12} double twinning in a magnesium alloy. Nature communications 7, 11068 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    B. Zhou, L. Wang, P. Jin, H. Jia, H. J. Roven, X. Zeng, Y. Li, Revealing slip-induced extension twinning behaviors dominated by micro deformation in a magnesium alloy. International Journal of Plasticity 128, 102669 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Hazeli, J

    K. Hazeli, J. Cuadra, F. Streller, C. Barr, M. Taheri, R. Carpick, A. Kontsos, Three- dimensional effects of twinning in magnesium alloys. Scripta Materialia 100, 9–12 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Q. Yu, J. Wang, Y. Jiang, R. J. McCabe, N. Li, C. N. Tomé, Twin–twin interactions in magnesium. Acta Materialia 77, 28–42 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    Jiang, M

    L. Jiang, M. Gong, J. Wang, Z. Pan, X. Wang, D. Zhang, Y. M. Wang, J. Ciston, A. M. Minor, M. Xu, X. Pan, T. J. Rupert, S. Mahajan, E. J. Lavernia, I. J. Beyerlein, J. M. Schoenung, Visualization and validation of twin nucleation and early-stage growth in magnesium. Nat Commun...

    2022

  3. [11]

    Y. Liu, P. Z. Tang, M. Y. Gong, R. J. McCabe, J. Wang, C. N. Tomé, Three-dimensional character of the deformation twin in magnesium. Nat Commun 10, 3308 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Y. Liu, N. Li, S. Shao, M. Gong, J. Wang, R. J. McCabe, Y. Jiang, C. N. Tomé, Characterizing the boundary lateral to the shear direction of deformation twins in magnesium. Nat Commun 7, 11577 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Arul Kumar, B

    M. Arul Kumar, B. Clausen, L. Capolungo, R. J. McCabe, W. Liu, J. Z. Tischler, C. N. Tomé, Deformation twinning and grain partitioning in a hexagonal close-packed magnesium alloy. Nat Commun 9, 4761 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Yield point of crystals, critical shear stress law

    E. Schmid, “Yield point of crystals, critical shear stress law” in Proceedings of the First International Congress for Applied Mechanics, Delft (1924)

    1924

  7. [15]

    J. Lind, S. Li, R. Pokharel, U. Lienert, A. Rollett, R. Suter, Tensile twin nucleation events coupled to neighboring slip observed in three dimensions. Acta Materialia 76, 213–220 (2014). 13

    2014

  8. [16]

    Abdolvand, M

    H. Abdolvand, M. Majkut, J. Oddershede, J. P. Wright, M. R. Daymond, Study of 3-D stress development in parent and twin pairs of a hexagonal close-packed polycrystal: Part I – in-situ three-dimensional synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurement. Acta Materialia 93, 246–255 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Carlsen, C

    M. Carlsen, C. Detlefs, C. Yildirim, T. Ræder, H. Simons, Simulating dark-field X-ray microscopy images with wavefront propagation techniques. Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv 78, 482–490 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Simons, A

    H. Simons, A. King, W. Ludwig, C. Detlefs, W. Pantleon, S. Schmidt, F. Stöhr, I. Snigireva, A. Snigirev, H. F. Poulsen, Dark-field X-ray microscopy for multiscale structural characterization. Nat Commun 6, 6098 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    The ESRF dark-field x-ray microscope at ID06

    M. Kutsal, P. Bernard, G. Berruyer, P. Cook, R. Hino, A. Jakobsen, W. Ludwig, J. Ormstrup, T. Roth, H. Simons, others, “The ESRF dark-field x-ray microscope at ID06” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (IOP Publishing, 2019)vol. 580, p. 012007

    2019

  12. [20]

    Simons, A

    H. Simons, A. C. Jakobsen, S. R. Ahl, C. Detlefs, H. F. Poulsen, Multiscale 3D characterization with dark-field x-ray microscopy. MRS Bulletin 41, 454–459 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    H. F. Poulsen, A. C. Jakobsen, H. Simons, S. R. Ahl, P. K. Cook, C. Detlefs, X-ray diffraction microscopy based on refractive optics. Journal of Applied Crystallography 50, 1441–1456 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Bucsek, H

    A. Bucsek, H. Seiner, H. Simons, C. Yildirim, P. Cook, Y. Chumlyakov, C. Detlefs, A. P. Stebner, Sub-surface measurements of the austenite microstructure in response to martensitic phase transformation. Acta Materialia 179, 273–286 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    S. Lee, T. Berman, C. Yildirim, C. Detlefs, J. Allison, A. Bucsek, Multiscale, multimodal characterization of recrystallized and non-recrystallized grains during in-situ annealing in a Mg-Zn-Ca alloy. (under review)

  16. [24]

    Yaghoobi, S

    M. Yaghoobi, S. Ganesan, S. Sundar, A. Lakshmanan, S. Rudraraju, J. E. Allison, V. Sundararaghavan, PRISMS-Plasticity: An open-source crystal plasticity finite element software. Computational Materials Science 169, 109078 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Arul Kumar, I

    M. Arul Kumar, I. J. Beyerlein, C. N. Tomé, Effect of local stress fields on twin characteristics in HCP metals. Acta Materialia 116, 143–154 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    H. Zhi, C. Zhang, S. Antonov, H. Yu, T. Guo, Y. Su, Investigations of dislocation-type evolution and strain hardening during mechanical twinning in Fe-22Mn-0.6C twinning- induced plasticity steel. Acta Materialia 195, 371–382 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    M. D. Sangid, The physics of fatigue crack initiation. International Journal of Fatigue 57, 58–72 (2013). 14

    2013

  20. [28]

    S. R. Yeratapally, M. G. Glavicic, M. Hardy, M. D. Sangid, Microstructure based fatigue life prediction framework for polycrystalline nickel-base superalloys with emphasis on the role played by twin boundaries in crack initiation. Acta Materialia 107, 152–167 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    H. Li, Y. Gao, Y. Wei, J. Ding, C. Du, Y. Li, H.-Y. Wang, Three-dimensional phase field modeling, orientation prediction and stress field analyses of twin-twin, twin-grain boundary reactions mediated by disclinations in hexagonal close-packed metals. Acta Materialia 281, 120386 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Bucsek, E

    A. Bucsek, E. C. P. Valenzuela, J. Moya, S. Lee, Y. Jin, Understanding the role of recrystallized versus non-recrystallized grains during annealing in Mg alloys [Dataset], European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (2025); https://doi.org/doi.org/10.15151/ESRF- ES-901214768

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.