Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 212 references

An accurate and efficient framework for modelling the surface chemistry of ionic materials

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adsorption enthalpies on ionic surfaces can be computed with coupled-cluster accuracy at roughly the cost of hybrid density functional theory, as demonstrated on 19 experimental measurements.

desk verdict A genuinely useful, open-source embedding framework and benchmark set with an honest error budget — but the NO-on-MgO monomer energies ride on 290–660 meV CCSD(T) corrections in a regime the authors themselves flag as unreliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17204 v2 pith:C5CAOP7L submitted 2024-12-23 physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Benjamin X. Shi , Andrew S. Rosen , Tobias Schäfer , Andreas Grüneis , Venkat Kapil , Andrea Zen , Angelos Michaelides This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords adsorptionenthalpycoupledclustertheoryembeddedmethodsurfacechemistryionicmaterialsdensityfunctionalbenchmarkingNOdimeronMgO(001)SKZCAMprotocol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that adsorption enthalpies for molecules on ionic-material surfaces can be computed with gold-standard coupled-cluster accuracy for roughly the cost of a hybrid density functional calculation. The central proposal is an automated multilevel embedding workflow that splits the adsorption enthalpy into an interaction energy treated with CCSD(T) and a set of smaller relaxation, zero-point, and thermal terms treated with a six-functional DFT ensemble. On 19 adsorbate–surface systems spanning almost 1.5 eV of binding strength, the computed enthalpies fall within experimental error bars. The same machinery is used to settle configuration debates, most notably predicting that NO adsorbs on MgO(001) as a covalently bonded cis-(NO)2 dimer, with all monomer configurations at least 80 meV less stable. If this holds, correlated wave-function methods become a routine, not heroic, tool for surface chemistry screening and DFT benchmarking.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the SKZCAM protocol, a set of rubrics that automatically generates a converging series of embedded quantum clusters for the adsorbate–surface system, surrounded by formal point charges and effective core potentials that reproduce the ionic environment. Interaction energies at the MP2 level on moderately sized clusters are extrapolated to the bulk limit, then a small ΔCC correction raises the result to CCSD(T) using local natural-orbital or domain-based local pair-natural-orbital approximations on smaller clusters; additional Δbasis and Δcore corrections recover basis-set and semi-core correlation effects. This mechanical embedding is layered in an ONIOM-style scheme, and the automation adds further intermediate layers that cut the cost of a CO-on-MgO interaction energy to about 600 CPU-hours, two orders of magnitude below the previous manual implementation. The remaining relaxation, zero-point, and thermal terms come from a six-functional DFT ensemble, with a quasi-rigid-rotor harmonic-oscillator treatment of low-frequency modes, giving conservative error bars on the final Hads.

What would settle it

Run a multireference method (for example CASPT2/NEVPT2 or diffusion Monte Carlo) on the same SKZCAM cluster series for the five NO monomer configurations; if any monomer interaction energy shifts by more than roughly 80 meV relative to the reported DLPNO-CCSD(T) values, the claim that all monomer configurations are at least 80 meV less stable than the cis-(NO)2 dimer is overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the autoSKZCAM framework delivers CCSD(T)-quality adsorption enthalpies Hads for ionic surfaces at a cost comparable to periodic hybrid DFT. The framework partitions Hads = Eint + Erlx + EZPV + ET − RT, computing the dominant interaction energy Eint with local coupled-cluster theory embedded in an electrostatic point-charge environment and extrapolated to the bulk limit via the SKZCAM protocol, while obtaining geometric relaxation, zero-point, and thermal contributions from an ensemble of six density functional approximations. Against experiment, the framework reproduces the adsorption enthalpy for 19 adsorbate–surface systems, including monolayers and molecular clusters, and identifies the most stable adsorption configuration for systems where DFT studies disagree. In the specific case of NO on MgO(001), it finds the cis-(NO)2 dimer configuration most stable with Hads consistent with experiment, while all five monomer configurations are more than 80 meV less stable. It also predicts chemisorbed carbonate for CO2 on MgO(001), a tilted geometry for CO2 on rutile(110), a parallel geometry for N2O on MgO(001), and partially dissociated hydrogen-bonded tetramers for H2O and CH3OH on MgO(001).

Load-bearing premise

The central numerical claim assumes that DLPNO-CCSD(T) with an unrestricted Hartree-Fock reference reliably captures the interaction energy of the open-shell NO monomer on MgO(001), even though the paper itself notes CCSD(T) performs poorly for open-shell radicals and reports ΔCC corrections up to 659 meV for these monomers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Correlated wave-function methods become applicable routinely, not just for one or two showcase systems, so multiple adsorption configurations can be compared at CCSD(T) quality with costs approaching those of hybrid DFT.
  • The 19-system dataset provides adsorption interaction-energy benchmarks for density functional approximations: PBE-MBD/FI and rev-vdW-DF2 come closest to the CCSD(T) values (mean absolute deviations of 26 and 25 meV), RPA underbinds the MgO(001) subset (58 meV), and PBE-D3, SCAN-rVV10 and r2SCAN-D4 overbind.
  • The configuration rulings resolve long-standing debates: NO on MgO(001) is a cis-(NO)2 dimer, CO2 on MgO(001) chemisorbs as a carbonate, CO2 on rutile(110) prefers a tilted geometry, N2O on MgO(001) binds parallel, and H2O and CH3OH adsorb as partially dissociated clusters on MgO(001).
  • Because the workflow is open source, it can operate as a screening tool in catalyst discovery and generate reference interaction energies for fitting machine-learned density functionals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own error analysis identifies the DFT-geometry error ϵgeom as the largest contribution to the Hads error bars; this suggests that obtaining reference geometries from a more accurate level of theory would tighten predictions most for strongly chemisorbed systems such as CO2 on MgO(001), where ϵgeom reaches 188 meV.
  • The NO monomer conclusion rests on an unrestricted-Hartree-Fock DLPNO-CCSD(T) treatment with ΔCC corrections as large as 659 meV, inside a regime the paper itself flags as questionable for CCSD(T); this suggests a multireference or quantum Monte Carlo check on the monomer clusters as the natural next test.
  • The point-charge-plus-effective-core-potential environment limits the framework to insulating ionic surfaces; extending the same partition-of-Hads idea to metals or covalent materials would require replacing that environment with a quantum embedding that couples the cluster to its surroundings through the electron density or Green's function.
  • The interaction-energy benchmark table may be the most durable scientific output, since it gives DFT developers reference values on surfaces, a class of systems the paper notes is underrepresented in existing benchmark sets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces autoSKZCAM, an automated embedded-cluster workflow that computes CCSD(T)-level interaction energies for adsorbates on ionic surfaces through the SKZCAM protocol, mechanical embedding, and local correlation approximations, with DFT ensembles used for relaxation and vibrational contributions. The framework is applied to 19 adsorbate–surface systems on MgO(001), TiO2 rutile(110), and anatase(101), with additional validation on LiH(001) and NaCl(001), and is used to benchmark density functional approximations and to address literature debates on adsorption geometries, most prominently the claim that NO on MgO(001) binds as a cis-(NO)2 dimer with all monomer configurations at least 80 meV less stable.

Significance. If the central results hold, this is a substantial methodological advance: it brings correlated wave-function-level adsorption energetics to a cost competitive with periodic hybrid DFT, automates a previously manual protocol, and provides a reusable open-source tool plus a CCSD(T)-level benchmark dataset for DFA assessment. The authors also deserve credit for transparent error propagation, for using experimental data purely as a benchmark rather than as fitting targets, and for validating the protocol against independent DMC and CCSD(T) results for LiH and NaCl. However, the strongest specific claim—the resolution of the NO adsorption debate—rests on DLPNO-CCSD(T) corrections of several hundred meV for open-shell radical monomers, a regime the paper itself identifies as problematic for CCSD(T); until a multireference cross-check is supplied, that particular conclusion should be treated as provisional.

major comments (2)
  1. [SI §S6.3, Table S8; Methods §S5; Discussion] The ΔCC corrections for the five NO monomer configurations are +289, -68, +626, -48, and +659 meV, whereas the closed-shell systems have corrections below 35 meV in magnitude. These corrections dominate or reverse the MP2 interaction energies: for Bent-Bridge, the MP2 Eint of -661 meV becomes -62 meV after the ΔCC and other corrections (Table S12). The paper's Discussion explicitly states that CCSD(T) 'performs poorly for open-shell molecules of radical character,' and for the NO dimer cohesive energy the authors deliberately switch to MRMP2 because CCSD(T) underbinds it (SI §S7.4, Table S19). No T1, D1, or %T1 diagnostics, and no alternative multireference or DMC calculation, are reported for the NO monomer configurations. Because the >80 meV monomer–dimer separation and the resolution of the NO adsorption debate (main-text Fig. 3, SI Table S1) rest on these energies, this is a load-bearing gap that needs to be addressed with a multireference cross-check for at least the most stable monomer configurations.
  2. [Main text Fig. 2; SI Table S30] The blanket statement that all 19 systems 'reproduce' experimental Hads is weakened by the size of the reported uncertainties for several systems: C6H6 has a total uncertainty of ±100 meV, Vertical-Hollow NO has Hads = 68 ± 91 meV, and H2O on rutile(110) has Hads = -1007 ± 57 meV. With uncertainties of this magnitude, agreement within error bars is a much weaker test than for systems with ±20 meV errors. The authors should qualify 'reproduced' with a precision-sensitive statement or separately identify which systems achieve chemical accuracy (43 meV), since the screening window of ~150 meV cited in the Introduction makes this distinction important.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Results] In the sentence 'A similar confidence interval has been calculated for the the individual terms', the duplicated article 'the the' should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'computational costs approaching DFT' is supported for the interaction-energy step, but the full Hads workflow also requires periodic DFT geometry optimizations and vibrational frequency calculations; the sentence should specify this scope.
  3. [SI §S8.3] The definition of ϵgeom as twice the RMSE over the DFA ensemble assumes that the error distribution is symmetric around the revPBE-D4 result; this assumption should be stated explicitly because the final error bars in Table S30 rest on it.
  4. [Code Availability] The GitHub link is useful, but for archival reproducibility the authors should deposit a versioned release with a DOI (e.g., Zenodo) and cite it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the adsorption-enthalpy predictions are not fitted to the experimental Hads benchmarks, and the self-cited SKZCAM protocol is independently validated; remaining concerns are correctness risks rather than circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. Hads is decomposed in Eq. (1) as Eint + Erlx + EZPV + ET − RT, with the dominant Eint computed from MP2 bulk extrapolations plus ΔCC corrections elevated to CCSD(T) via the SKZCAM protocol (Methods, Sec. S6). No experimental adsorption enthalpy enters any step of this calculation; experimental values are used purely as a benchmark in Fig. 2 and Sec. S9, and the paper explicitly reports the RMSD against both the original TPD analysis (102 meV) and the Campbell-Sellers system-specific pre-exponential re-analysis (58 meV), showing the simulations are not tuned to either set. The SKZCAM protocol is self-cited (refs. 48, 49, 51), but it is a systematic cluster-extrapolation and mechanical-embedding procedure rather than a fitted model, and its central components are checked against independent DMC results, canonical CCSD(T) in Table S9, and prior embedded-cluster CCSD(T) studies by Sauer and co-workers and Kubas et al. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to forbid alternatives. The most serious scientific caveat—the use of UHF-based DLPNO-CCSD(T) for open-shell NO monomers despite the paper's own statement that CCSD(T) 'performs poorly for open-shell molecules of radical character'—is a genuine methodological-risk concern (large ΔCC corrections of 289–659 meV in Table S8), but it is not circularity: the failure mode would be inaccuracy of a first-principles method, not a prediction reducing to its input by construction. Hence the appropriate circularity score is 1, reflecting only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on methodological extrapolations (cluster series, basis set, core-valence) and on the transferability of small-cluster ΔCC corrections. No parameters are fit to the target experimental adsorption enthalpies; the experiment is used only as a benchmark. The main non-methodological assumption is the reliability of the re-analyzed TPD reference values.

free parameters (3)
  • 1/N cluster extrapolation coefficients (A and E_bulk) = Per system, e.g., CO on MgO: E_bulk = -199 meV (Table S7)
    Eint(N) = E_bulk + A/N is fitted to the MP2 cluster series to reach the bulk limit; the choice of N^-1 form is assumed, not derived.
  • TiO2 bulk-limit choice = Eint of the 5th SKZCAM cluster, e.g., -267 meV for CH4 on rutile(110)
    For TiO2 surfaces convergence is oscillatory, so the 5th cluster value is used directly instead of a 1/N fit.
  • quasi-RRHO interpolation frequency ν0 = 100 cm^-1
    Standard parameter from Grimme/Li et al. used for thermal contributions; set by hand and not varied.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The ΔCC correction (CCSD(T)-MP2) computed on small clusters transfers to the MP2 bulk limit.
    ONIOM-style mechanical embedding; errors are estimated via cluster-to-cluster deviation (Table S8), but cluster-size transferability is assumed.
  • domain assumption Formal point-charge electrostatic embedding (+2/-2/+4) reproduces the surface Madelung potential.
    Standard for ionic crystals; py-Chemshell environment with 50-60 Å fields; no direct validation against full periodic cWFT.
  • domain assumption The N^-1 extrapolation form is correct for the cluster-size dependence of MP2 Eint.
    Motivated by finite-size scaling; verified only by internal consistency of the fits.
  • domain assumption CCSD(T) is the appropriate reference for these adsorbate-surface systems.
    Widely trusted for weakly correlated systems; authors note exceptions (radicals, metals) and use it anyway for NO monomers.
  • domain assumption Experimental TPD values re-analyzed with Campbell-Sellers system-specific pre-exponential factors are the correct ground truth.
    External experimental data; the re-analysis changes agreement RMSD from 102 to 58 meV, indicating sensitivity to this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An accurate and efficient framework for modelling the surface chemistry of ionic materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C5CAOP7L

@misc{pith2026241217204,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An accurate and efficient framework for modelling the surface chemistry of ionic materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C5CAOP7L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17204}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum-mechanical simulations can offer atomic-level insights into chemical processes on surfaces. This understanding is crucial for the rational design of new solid catalysts as well as materials to store energy and mitigate greenhouse gases. However, achieving the accuracy needed for reliable predictions has proven challenging. Density functional theory (DFT), the workhorse quantum-mechanical method, can often lead to inconsistent predictions, necessitating accurate methods from correlated wave-function theory (cWFT). However, the high computational demands and significant user intervention associated with cWFT have traditionally made it impractical to carry out for surfaces. In this work, we address this challenge, presenting an automated framework which leverages multilevel embedding approaches, to apply accurate cWFT methods to the surfaces of ionic materials with computational costs approaching DFT. With this framework, we have reproduced experimental adsorption enthalpies for a diverse set of 19 adsorbate-surface systems. Moreover, we resolve debates on the adsorption configuration of several systems, while offering benchmarks to assess DFT. This framework is open-source, making it possible to more routinely apply cWFT to complex problems involving the surfaces of ionic materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17204 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Reliable insights into the surface chemistry of ionic materials with the autoSKZCAM framework. Schematic description of the open-source autoSKZCAM framework. From a set of adsorbate–surface configurations, this framework can identify the most stable configuration and calculate an adsorption enthalpy Hads that reproduces experi￾ment. It partitions Hads via a divide-and-conquer scheme. The dominant contribution — the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Consensus with experiments for a range of adsorbates on ionic surfaces. Comparison of adsorption enthalpies computed with the autoSKZCAM framework against high-quality temperature programmed desorption experiments for a set of 19 adsorbate– surface combinations. These include (a) single molecules adsorbed on the MgO(001) surface, (b) monolayers adsorbed on MgO(001), (c) single molecules adsorbed on TiO2 rutile(110) … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Correct identification of the NO on MgO(001) adsorption configuration. For NO on MgO(001), six adsorption configurations have been proposed: “Dimer Mg”, “Bent Mg”, “Upright Mg”, “Bent Bridge”, “Bent O” and “Upright Hollow”. These names reflect their orientation and binding sites on the surface. The adsorption enthalpy Hads is calculated for each configuration with the autoSKZCAM framework and a set of 6 density func… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A benchmark for lower-level theories. The autoSKZCAM framework inter￾action energy benchmarks are used to assess a selection of density functional approximations along Jacob’s ladder as well as the random phase approximation. The deviation from the au￾toSKZCAM estimate…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: High accuracy at comparable cost to periodic hybrid DFT. For the chemisorbed CO2 on MgO(001) and H2O on TiO2 rutile(110), we demonstrate the (a) im￾proved agreement to experimental TPD measurements 68,105 for the autoSKZCAM framework relative to previous DFT (in grey) …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

212 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    More intermediate layers in the ONIOM mechanical embedding treatment. For example, we have added the ∆ basis and ∆core terms to the final Eint, enabling cheaper calculations of ∆CC and Ebulk MP2 int – the two dominant contributions to the overall computational cost – including only valence, no longer requiring semicore, electrons in the correlation treatm...

  2. [2]

    on- top”, “bridge

    The use of multiple different codes that are efficient for different types of calculations. We can utilise the ORCA code to perform efficient MP2 calculations [268] while still leveraging the LNO-CCSD(T) implementation [270, 271] in MRCC. Previously, we were limited towards only using one code due to the additional manual overhead. Overall, these improvem...

  3. [12]

    Ferry, D. et al. The properties of a two-dimensional water layer on MgO(001). Surf. Sci. 377–379, 634–638 (1997)

    1997

  4. [18]

    Physisorbed and chemisorbed CO 2 at surface and step sites of the MgO(100) surface

    Pacchioni, G. Physisorbed and chemisorbed CO 2 at surface and step sites of the MgO(100) surface. Surf. Sci. 281, 207–219 (1993). 91

    1993

  5. [29]

    Fu, Y., Zhang, L., Yue, B., Chen, X. & He, H. Simultaneous Characterization of Solid Acidity and Basicity of Metal Oxide Catalysts via the Solid-State NMR Technique. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 24094–24102 (2018)

    2018

  6. [35]

    C., Lee, J., Al-Saidi, W

    Sorescu, D. C., Lee, J., Al-Saidi, W. A. & Jordan, K. D. CO 2 adsorption on TiO2(110) rutile: Insight from dispersion-corrected density functional theory calculations and scanning tunneling microscopy 92 experiments. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 104707 (2011)

    2011

  7. [46]

    Todnem, K., Børve, K. J. & Nygren, M. Molecular adsorption of methane and methyl onto MgO(100) An embedded-cluster study. Surf. Sci. 421, 296–307 (1999)

    1999

  8. [53]

    & Coulomb, J

    Trabelsi, M., Saidi, S. & Coulomb, J. P. Structural study of C 2D6 thin films adsorbed on MgO(100). 93 Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 53, 748–752 (2015)

    2015

Show all 212 references
  1. [64]

    Xia, C. et al. Emerging cocatalysts in TiO 2-based photocatalysts for light-driven catalytic hydrogen evolution: Progress and perspectives. Fuel 307, 121745 (2022)

    2022

  2. [71]

    The MRCC program system: Accurate quantum chemistry from water to proteins

    K´ allay, M.et al. The MRCC program system: Accurate quantum chemistry from water to proteins. 94 J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074107 (2020)

    2020

  3. [80]

    Bistoni, G. et al. Treating Subvalence Correlation Effects in Domain Based Pair Natural Orbital Coupled Cluster Calculations: An Out-of-the-Box Approach. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3220– 3227 (2017)

    2017

  4. [86]

    Shi, B. X. et al. General embedded cluster protocol for accurate modeling of oxygen vacancies in metal-oxides. J. Chem. Phys. 156, 124704 (2022). 95

    2022

  5. [98]

    Dunn, S. K. & Ewing, G. E. Infrared spectra and structure of acetylene on sodium chloride (100). J. Phys. Chem. 96, 5284–5290 (1992)

    1992

  6. [101]

    X., Wales, D

    Shi, B. X., Wales, D. J., Michaelides, A. & Myung, C. W. Going for Gold(-Standard): Attaining Coupled Cluster Accuracy in Oxide-Supported Nanoclusters. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 5306– 5316 (2024)

    2024

  7. [102]

    R., Adeleke, A

    Bryenton, K. R., Adeleke, A. A., Dale, S. G. & Johnson, E. R. Delocalization error: The greatest outstanding challenge in density-functional theory. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 13, e1631 (2023)

    2023

  8. [103]

    & Lacome, N

    Dkhissi, A., Soulard, P., Perrin, A. & Lacome, N. The NO Dimer. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 183, 12–17 (1997)

    1997

  9. [104]

    A., Cline, J

    Wade, E. A., Cline, J. I., Lorenz, K. T., Hayden, C. & Chandler, D. W. Direct measurement of the binding energy of the NO dimer. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 4755–4757 (2002). 96

    2002

  10. [105]

    & Roos, B

    Gonz´ alez-Luque, R., Merch´ an, M. & Roos, B. O. A theoretical determination of the dissociation energy of the nitric oxide dimer. Theoret. Chim. Acta 88, 425–435 (1994)

    1994

  11. [106]

    Say´ os, R., Valero, R., Anglada, J. M. & Gonz´ alez, M. Theoretical investigation of the eight low-lying electronic states of the cis- and trans-nitric oxide dimers and its isomerization using multiconfigura- tional second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2). J. Chem. Phys. 11...

    2000

  12. [107]

    Ivanic, J., Schmidt, M. W. & Luke, B. High-level theoretical study of the NO dimer and tetramer: Has the tetramer been observed? J. Chem. Phys. 137, 214316 (2012)

    2012

  13. [108]

    Tobita, M. et al. Critical comparison of single-reference and multireference coupled-cluster methods: Geometry, harmonic frequencies, and excitation energies of N 2O2. The Journal of Chemical Physics 119, 10713–10723 (2003)

    2003

  14. [109]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  15. [110]

    D., Kong, L., Lundqvist, B

    Lee, K., Murray, ´E. D., Kong, L., Lundqvist, B. I. & Langreth, D. C. Higher-accuracy van der Waals density functional. Phys. Rev. B 82, 081101 (2010)

    2010

  16. [111]

    Van der Waals density functional made accurate

    Hamada, I. Van der Waals density functional made accurate. Phys. Rev. B 89, 121103 (2014)

    2014

  17. [112]

    & Barone, V

    Adamo, C. & Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6170 (1999)

    1999

  18. [113]

    Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993)

    1993

  19. [114]

    Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction

    Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comp. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006)

    2006

  20. [115]

    Buˇ cko, T., Leb` egue, S.,´Angy´ an, J. G. & Hafner, J. Extending the applicability of the Tkatchenko- Scheffler dispersion correction via iterative Hirshfeld partitioning. The Journal of Chemical Physics 141, 034114 (2014)

    2014

  21. [116]

    Ning, J. et al. Workhorse minimally empirical dispersion-corrected density functional with tests for weakly bound systems: r 2SCAN+rVV10. Phys. Rev. B 106, 075422 (2022)

    2022

  22. [117]

    Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003)

    2003

  23. [118]

    P., Lim, W

    Singh, J. P., Lim, W. C., Won, S. O., Song, J. & Chae, K. H. Synthesis and Characterization of Some Alkaline-Earth-Oxide Nanoparticles. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 72, 890–899 (2018)

    2018

  24. [119]

    K., Hughbanks, T., Miller, G

    Burdett, J. K., Hughbanks, T., Miller, G. J., Richardson, J. W. & Smith, J. V. Structural-electronic relationships in inorganic solids: Powder neutron diffraction studies of the rutile and anatase poly- morphs of titanium dioxide at 15 and 295 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 3639–36...

    1987

  25. [120]

    & Furthm¨ uller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthm¨ uller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semicon- ductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996)

    1996

  26. [121]

    & Furthm¨ uller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthm¨ uller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996)

    1996

  27. [122]

    Supramolecular Binding Thermodynamics by Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional 97 Theory

    Grimme, S. Supramolecular Binding Thermodynamics by Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional 97 Theory. Chem. - Eur. J. 18, 9955–9964 (2012)

    2012

  28. [123]

    Li, Y.-P., Gomes, J., Mallikarjun Sharada, S., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Improved Force-Field Parameters for QM/MM Simulations of the Energies of Adsorption for Molecules in Zeolites and a Free Rotor Correction to the Rigid Rotor Harmonic Oscillator Model for Adsorption En...

    2015

  29. [124]

    & Gillan, M

    Alf` e, D. & Gillan, M. J. Ab initio statistical mechanics of surface adsorption and desorption. II. Nuclear quantum effects. J. Chem. Phys. 133, 044103 (2010)

    2010

  30. [125]

    & Sauer, J

    Piccini, G. & Sauer, J. Effect of Anharmonicity on Adsorption Thermodynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 2479–2487 (2014)

    2014

  31. [126]

    Shi, B. X. Benshi97/autoSKZCAM (2025)

    2025

  32. [127]

    Rosen, A. S. Quacc – The Quantum Accelerator: https://zenodo.org/records/13921187. Zenodo (2024)

    2024

  33. [128]

    Campbell, C. T. Energies of Adsorbed Catalytic Intermediates on Transition Metal Surfaces: Calori- metric Measurements and Benchmarks for Theory. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 984–993 (2019)

    2019

  34. [129]

    Schmid, M., Parkinson, G. S. & Diebold, U. Analysis of Temperature-Programmed Desorption via Equilibrium Thermodynamics. ACS Phys. Chem Au 3, 44–62 (2023)

    2023

  35. [130]

    Physisorption of CO on the MgO(100) Surface

    Dohn´ alek, Z.et al. Physisorption of CO on the MgO(100) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 3747–3751 (2001)

    2001

  36. [131]

    Redhead, P. A. Thermal desorption of gases. Vacuum 12, 203–211 (1962)

    1962

  37. [132]

    Campbell, C. T. & Sellers, J. R. V. The Entropies of Adsorbed Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18109–18115 (2012)

    2012

  38. [133]

    Boese, A. D. & Sauer, J. Accurate adsorption energies of small molecules on oxide surfaces: CO– MgO(001). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 16481–16493 (2013)

    2013

  39. [134]

    & Sauer, J

    Alessio, M., Usvyat, D. & Sauer, J. Chemically Accurate Adsorption Energies: CO and H 2O on the MgO(001) Surface. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1329–1344 (2019)

    2019

  40. [135]

    Espenson, J. H. Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Mechanisms (McGraw-Hill, 1995)

    1995

  41. [136]

    Wellendorff, J. et al. A benchmark database for adsorption bond energies to transition metal surfaces and comparison to selected DFT functionals. Surf. Sci. 640, 36–44 (2015)

    2015

  42. [137]

    & Mavrikakis, M

    Rangarajan, S. & Mavrikakis, M. A comparative analysis of different van der Waals treatments for molecular adsorption on the basal plane of 2H-MoS 2. Surf. Sci. 729, 122226 (2023)

    2023

  43. [138]

    A., Kose, R

    Brown, W. A., Kose, R. & King, D. A. Femtomole Adsorption Calorimetry on Single-Crystal Surfaces. Chem. Rev. 98, 797–832 (1998)

    1998

  44. [139]

    L., Dohn´ alek, Z., Campbell, C

    Tait, S. L., Dohn´ alek, Z., Campbell, C. T. & Kay, B. D. N-alkanes on MgO(100). I. Coverage-dependent desorption kinetics of n-butane. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 164707 (2005)

    2005

  45. [140]

    L., Dohn´ alek, Z., Campbell, C

    Tait, S. L., Dohn´ alek, Z., Campbell, C. T. & Kay, B. D. N-alkanes on MgO(100). II. Chain length dependence of kinetic desorption parameters for small n-alkanes. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 164708 (2005)

    2005

  46. [141]

    Lian, J. C. et al. N 2O Adsorption on the Surface of MgO(001) Thin Films: An Infrared and TPD Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 3148–3151 (2010). 98

    2010

  47. [142]

    C., Guo, Q., Xu, C

    Street, S. C., Guo, Q., Xu, C. & Goodman, D. W. Adsorption and Electronic States of Benzene on Ordered MgO and Al 2O3 Thin Films. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 17599–17605 (1996)

    1996

  48. [143]

    A., Meixner, D

    Arthur, D. A., Meixner, D. L., Boudart, M. & George, S. M. Adsorption, desorption, and surface diffusion kinetics of NH 3 on MgO(100). J. Chem. Phys. 95, 8521–8531 (1991)

    1991

  49. [144]

    J., Huang, C., Scott Smith, R., Joyce, S

    Stirniman, M. J., Huang, C., Scott Smith, R., Joyce, S. A. & Kay, B. D. The adsorption and desorption of water on single crystal MgO(100): The role of surface defects. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 1295–1298 (1996)

    1996

  50. [145]

    S., Kay, B

    Chen, L., Smith, R. S., Kay, B. D. & Dohn´ alek, Z. Adsorption of small hydrocarbons on rutile TiO2(110). Surf. Sci. 650, 83–92 (2016)

    2016

  51. [146]

    L., Diwald, O

    Thompson, T. L., Diwald, O. & Yates, J. T. CO 2 as a Probe for Monitoring the Surface Defects on TiO2(110)Temperature-Programmed Desorption. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 11700–11704 (2003)

    2003

  52. [147]

    B., Gamble, L

    Hugenschmidt, M. B., Gamble, L. & Campbell, C. T. The interaction of H 2O with a TiO 2(110) surface. Surf. Sci. 302, 329–340 (1994)

    1994

  53. [148]

    Dohn´ alek, Z., Kim, J., Bondarchuk, O., White, J. M. & Kay, B. D. Physisorption of N 2, O2, and CO on Fully Oxidized TiO2(110). J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 6229–6235 (2006)

    2006

  54. [149]

    S., Kay, B

    Li, Z., Smith, R. S., Kay, B. D. & Dohn´ alek, Z. Determination of Absolute Coverages for Small Aliphatic Alcohols on TiO 2(110). J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 22534–22539 (2011)

    2011

  55. [150]

    S., Dohn´ alek, Z., Ruzycki, N

    Herman, G. S., Dohn´ alek, Z., Ruzycki, N. & Diebold, U. Experimental Investigation of the Interaction of Water and Methanol with Anatase-TiO 2(101). J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 2788–2795 (2003)

    2003

  56. [151]

    Koust, S. et al. NH 3 adsorption on anatase-TiO 2(101). J. Chem. Phys. 148, 124704 (2018)

    2018

  57. [152]

    & Shluger, A

    Trevethan, T. & Shluger, A. L. Building Blocks for Molecular Devices: Organic Molecules on the MgO (001) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 15375–15381 (2007)

    2007

  58. [153]

    M., Huber, S., Kn¨ ozinger, H., Neyman, K

    Ferrari, A. M., Huber, S., Kn¨ ozinger, H., Neyman, K. M. & R¨ osch, N. FTIR Spectroscopic and Density Functional Model Cluster Studies of Methane Adsorption on MgO. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 4548–4555 (1998)

    1998

  59. [154]

    Boese, A. D. & Sauer, J. Accurate adsorption energies for small molecules on oxide surfaces: CH4/MgO(001) and C 2H6/MgO(001). J. Comp. Chem. 37, 2374–2385 (2016)

    2016

  60. [155]

    Valero, R., Gomes, J. R. B., Truhlar, D. G. & Illas, F. Good performance of the M06 family of hybrid meta generalized gradient approximation density functionals on a difficult case: CO adsorption on MgO(001). The Journal of Chemical Physics 129, 124710 (2008)

    2008

  61. [156]

    Rehak, F., Piccini, G., Alessio, M

    R. Rehak, F., Piccini, G., Alessio, M. & Sauer, J. Including dispersion in density functional theory for adsorption on flat oxide surfaces, in metal–organic frameworks and in acidic zeolites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 7577–7585 (2020)

    2020

  62. [157]

    & Berkelbach, T

    Ye, H.-Z. & Berkelbach, T. C. Adsorption and vibrational spectroscopy of CO on the surface of MgO from periodic local coupled-cluster theory. Faraday Discuss. (2024)

    2024

  63. [158]

    R., Cho, M., Agarawal, V

    Mitra, A., Hermes, M. R., Cho, M., Agarawal, V. & Gagliardi, L. Periodic Density Matrix Embedding for CO Adsorption on the MgO(001) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 7483–7489 (2022)

    2022

  64. [159]

    & Suzanne, J

    Giordano, L., Goniakowski, J. & Suzanne, J. Partial Dissociation of Water Molecules in the (3x2) 99 Water Monolayer Deposited on the MgO (100) Surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1271–1273 (1998)

    1998

  65. [160]

    & Lopez, N

    Carrasco, J., Illas, F. & Lopez, N. Dynamic Ion Pairs in the Adsorption of Isolated Water Molecules on Alkaline-Earth Oxide (001) Surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016101 (2008)

    2008

  66. [161]

    L., Carrasco, J., Klimeˇ s, J

    Hu, X. L., Carrasco, J., Klimeˇ s, J. & Michaelides, A. Trends in water monomer adsorption and dissociation on flat insulating surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 12447–12453 (2011)

    2011

  67. [162]

    G., Sp˚ angberg, D., Mitev, P

    Kebede, G. G., Sp˚ angberg, D., Mitev, P. D., Broqvist, P. & Hermansson, K. Comparing van der Waals DFT methods for water on NaCl(001) and MgO(001). J. Chem. Phys. 146, 064703 (2017)

    2017

  68. [163]

    Karalti, O., Alf` e, D., Gillan, M. J. & Jordan, K. D. Adsorption of a water molecule on the MgO(100) surface as described by cluster and slab models. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 7846–7853 (2012)

    2012

  69. [164]

    & Gillan, M

    Pugh, S. & Gillan, M. J. The energetics of NH 3 adsorption at the MgO(001) surface. Surf. Sci. 320, 331–343 (1994)

    1994

  70. [165]

    & Doren, D

    Nakajima, Y. & Doren, D. J. Ammonia adsorption on MgO(100): A density functional theory study. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 7753–7762 (1996)

    1996

  71. [166]

    & Girardet, C

    Allouche, A., Cor` a, F. & Girardet, C. Vibrational infrared spectrum of NH 3 adsorbed on MgO(100). I. Ab initio calculations. Chem. Phys. 201, 59–71 (1995)

    1995

  72. [167]

    Lv, G. et al. CO 2 adsorption on a K-promoted MgO surface: A DFT theoretical study. Surf. Sci. 749, 122575 (2024)

    2024

  73. [168]

    & Cheng, P

    Song, Z., Zhao, B., Xu, H. & Cheng, P. Remarkably Strong Chemisorption of Nitric Oxide on Insulating Oxide Films Promoted by Hybrid Structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 21482–21490 (2017)

    2017

  74. [169]

    & Yamabe, S.-i

    Yanagisawa, Y., Kuramoto, K. & Yamabe, S.-i. Three Types of Adsorptions of Nitric Oxide on the MgO Surface. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 11078–11085 (1999)

    1999

  75. [170]

    A., Jirsak, T., P´ erez, M., Gonz´ alez, L

    Rodriguez, J. A., Jirsak, T., P´ erez, M., Gonz´ alez, L. & Maiti, A. Studies on the behavior of mixed-metal oxides: Adsorption of CO and NO on MgO(100), Ni xMg1-xO(100), and CrxMg1-xO(100). J. Chem. Phys. 114, 4186–4195 (2001)

    2001

  76. [171]

    & Soto, L

    A˜ nez, R., Sierraalta, A. & Soto, L. J. D. NO and NO 2 adsorption on subsurface doped MgO (100) and BaO (100) surfaces. A density functional study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 404, 216–229 (2017)

    2017

  77. [172]

    L., Hass, K

    Miletic, M., Gland, J. L., Hass, K. C. & Schneider, W. F. First-Principles Characterization of NO x Adsorption on MgO. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 157–163 (2003)

    2003

  78. [173]

    F., Hass, K

    Schneider, W. F., Hass, K. C., Miletic, M. & Gland, J. L. Dramatic Cooperative Effects in Adsorption of NOx on MgO(001). J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 7405–7413 (2002)

    2002

  79. [174]

    Schneider, W. F. Qualitative Differences in the Adsorption Chemistry of Acidic (CO 2, SO x) and Amphiphilic (NOx) Species on the Alkaline Earth Oxides. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 273–282 (2004)

    2004

  80. [175]

    & Zhang, Q

    Lu, X., Xu, X., Wang, N. & Zhang, Q. Adsorption and Decomposition of NO on Magnesium Oxide: A Quantum Chemical Study. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 5657–5664 (1999)

    1999

  81. [176]

    Y., Kim, K., Kim, E

    Lim, J. Y., Kim, K., Kim, E. Y. & Han, J. W. Density functional theory study of NO x adsorption on alkaline earth metal oxide and transition metal surfaces. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 36, 1258–1266 (2019)

    2019

  82. [177]

    H., Branda, M

    Rodr´ ıguez, A. H., Branda, M. M. & Castellani, N. J. Adsorption of n Methanol Molecules on MgO(100) with n = 1 to 4: A Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 10603–10609 (2007). 100

    2007

  83. [178]

    Gay, I. D. & Harrison, N. M. A density functional study of water and methanol chemisorption on MgO(110). Surf. Sci. 591, 13–22 (2005)

    2005

  84. [179]

    Man, I.-C., Soriga, S. G. & Parvulescu, V. Theoretical aspects of methyl acetate and methanol activa- tion on MgO(100) and (501) catalyst surfaces with application in FAME production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 392, 920–928 (2017)

    2017

  85. [180]

    L., Klimeˇ s, J

    Hu, X. L., Klimeˇ s, J. & Michaelides, A. Proton transfer in adsorbed water dimers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 3953–3956 (2010)

    2010

  86. [181]

    S., Borges, I

    Alvim, R. S., Borges, I. J., Costa, D. G. & Leit˜ ao, A. A. Density-Functional Theory Simulation of the Dissociative Chemisorption of Water Molecules on the MgO(001) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 738–744 (2012)

    2012

  87. [182]

    & Selloni, A

    Ding, Z. & Selloni, A. Hydration structure of flat and stepped MgO surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 114708 (2021)

    2021

  88. [183]

    Stimac, P. J. & Hinde, R. J. Simulating CH 4 physisorption on ionic crystals. Eur. Phys. J. D 46, 69–76 (2008)

    2008

  89. [184]

    Pisani, C. et al. Periodic local MP2 method for the study of electronic correlation in crystals: Theory and preliminary applications. Journal of Computational Chemistry 29, 2113–2124 (2008)

    2008

  90. [185]

    J., Brett, P

    Tillotson, M. J., Brett, P. M., Bennett, R. A. & Grau-Crespo, R. Adsorption of organic molecules at the TiO2(110) surface: The effect of van der Waals interactions. Surf. Sci. 632, 142–153 (2015)

    2015

  91. [186]

    & Huˇ s, M

    Kovaˇ ciˇ c,ˇZ., Likozar, B. & Huˇ s, M. Electronic properties of rutile and anatase TiO 2 and their effect on CO2 adsorption: A comparison of first principle approaches. Fuel 328, 125322 (2022)

    2022

  92. [187]

    & Michaelides, A

    Liu, L.-M., Zhang, C., Thornton, G. & Michaelides, A. Structure and dynamics of liquid water on rutile TiO2(110). Phys. Rev. B 82, 161415 (2010)

    2010

  93. [188]

    Bandura, A. V. et al. Adsorption of Water on the TiO 2 (Rutile) (110) Surface: A Comparison of Periodic and Embedded Cluster Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 7844–7853 (2004)

    2004

  94. [189]

    Stefanovich, E. V. & Truong, T. N. Ab initio study of water adsorption on TiO 2(110): Molecular adsorption versus dissociative chemisorption. Chem. Phys. Lett. 299, 623–629 (1999)

    1999

  95. [190]

    & Berkelbach, T

    Ye, H.-Z. & Berkelbach, T. C. Ab initio surface chemistry with chemical accuracy. arXiv:2309.14640 (2024). 2309.14640

    2024 arXiv

  96. [191]

    & Gr¨ uneis, A

    Sch¨ afer, T., Libisch, F., Kresse, G. & Gr¨ uneis, A. Local embedding of coupled cluster theory into the random phase approximation using plane waves. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 011101 (2021)

    2021

  97. [192]

    & Idriss, H

    Kieu, L., Boyd, P. & Idriss, H. Trends within the adsorption energy of alcohols over rutile TiO 2(110) and (011) clusters. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 188, 153–161 (2002)

    2002

  98. [193]

    P., Kresse, G

    Bates, S. P., Kresse, G. & Gillan, M. J. The adsorption and dissociation of ROH molecules on TiO2(110). Surf. Sci. 409, 336–349 (1998)

    1998

  99. [194]

    & Liu, L.-M

    Lang, X., Wen, B., Zhou, C., Ren, Z. & Liu, L.-M. First-Principles Study of Methanol Oxidation into Methyl Formate on Rutile TiO 2(110). J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 19859–19868 (2014)

    2014

  100. [195]

    Vittadini, A., Selloni, A., Rotzinger, F. P. & Gr¨ atzel, M. Structure and Energetics of Water Adsorbed at TiO2 Anatase (101) and (001) Surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2954–2957 (1998). 101

    1998

  101. [196]

    L., Musgrave, C

    Miller, K. L., Musgrave, C. B., Falconer, J. L. & Medlin, J. W. Effects of Water and Formic Acid Adsorption on the Electronic Structure of Anatase TiO 2(101). J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 2738–2749 (2011)

    2011

  102. [197]

    & Senkan, S

    Onal, I., Soyer, S. & Senkan, S. Adsorption of water and ammonia on TiO 2-anatase cluster models. Surf. Sci. 600, 2457–2469 (2006)

    2006

  103. [198]

    & Zou, Z

    Zhao, Z., Li, Z. & Zou, Z. Structure and Properties of Water on the Anatase TiO 2(101) Surface: From Single-Molecule Adsorption to Interface Formation. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 11054–11061 (2012)

    2012

  104. [199]

    & Kl¨ uner, T

    Petersen, T. & Kl¨ uner, T. Water Adsorption on Ideal Anatase-TiO 2(101) – An Embedded Cluster Model for Accurate Adsorption Energetics and Excited State Properties.Z. Phys. Chem. 234, 813–834 (2020)

    2020

  105. [200]

    & Ruangpornvisuti, V

    Wanbayor, R. & Ruangpornvisuti, V. Adsorption of CO, H 2, N 2O, NH 3 and CH 4 on the anatase TiO2(001) and (101) surfaces and their competitive adsorption predicted by periodic DFT calculations. Mater. Chem. Phys. 124, 720–725 (2010)

    2010

  106. [201]

    & Chen, H.-T

    Chang, J.-G., Ju, S.-P., Chang, C.-S. & Chen, H.-T. Adsorption Configuration and Dissociative Reaction of NH 3 on Anatase (101) Surface with and without Hydroxyl Groups. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 6663–6672 (2009)

    2009

  107. [202]

    Adaptively Compressed Exchange Operator

    Lin, L. Adaptively Compressed Exchange Operator. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 2242–2249 (2016)

    2016

  108. [203]

    Shi, B. X. Research data supporting: An accurate and efficient framework for predictive insights into ionic surface chemistry. https://github.com/benshi97/Data autoSKZCAM (2024)

    2024

  109. [204]

    & Goodman, D

    G¨ unster, J., Liu, G., Stultz, J. & Goodman, D. W. Interaction of methanol and water on MgO(100) studied by ultraviolet photoelectron and metastable impact electron spectroscopies. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 2558–2565 (1999)

    1999

  110. [205]

    Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple

    Zhang, Y. & Yang, W. Comment on “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 890–890 (1998)

    1998

  111. [206]

    Caldeweyher, E. et al. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 154122 (2019)

    2019

  112. [207]

    Petitjean, H. et al. Quantitative Investigation of MgO Brønsted Basicity: DFT, IR, and Calorimetry Study of Methanol Adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 3008–3016 (2010)

    2010

  113. [208]

    Sainna, M

    A. Sainna, M. et al. A combined periodic DFT and QM/MM approach to understand the radical mechanism of the catalytic production of methanol from glycerol. Faraday Discuss. 229, 108–130 (2021)

    2021

  114. [209]

    M., Peralta, J

    Branda, M. M., Peralta, J. E., Castellani, N. J. & Contreras, R. H. Theoretical study of charge transfer interactions in methanol adsorbed on magnesium oxide. Surf. Sci. 504, 235–243 (2002)

    2002

  115. [210]

    Trabelsi, M. et al. Thermodynamic and structural study of methanol thin films adsorbed on MgO(100). Surf. Sci. 566–568, 789–793 (2004)

    2004

  116. [211]

    & Foster, M

    Rudberg, J. & Foster, M. Adsorption of Methanol on the MgO(100) Surface: An Infrared Study at Room Temperature. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 18311–18317 (2004)

    2004

  117. [212]

    Ferry, D. et al. The properties of a two-dimensional water layer on MgO(001). Surf. Sci. 377–379, 102 634–638 (1997)

    1997

  118. [213]

    Ferry, D. et al. Water monolayers on MgO(100): Structural investigations by LEED experiments, tensor LEED dynamical analysis and potential calculations. Surf. Sci. 409, 101–116 (1998)

    1998

  119. [214]

    L., Arthur, D

    Meixner, D. L., Arthur, D. A. & George, S. M. Kinetics of desorption, adsorption, and surface diffusion of CO2 on MgO(100). Surf. Sci. 261, 141–154 (1992)

    1992

  120. [215]

    & Burghaus, U

    Chakradhar, A. & Burghaus, U. Carbon dioxide adsorption on MgO(001)–CO 2 kinetics and dynamics. Surf. Sci. 616, 171–177 (2013)

    2013

  121. [216]

    Pacchioni, G., Ricart, J. M. & Illas, F. Ab Initio Cluster Model Calculations on the Chemisorption of CO2 and SO2 Probe Molecules on MgO and CaO (100) Surfaces. A Theoretical Measure of Oxide Basicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 10152–10158 (1994)

    1994

  122. [217]

    B., Pettersson, L

    Jensen, M. B., Pettersson, L. G. M., Swang, O. & Olsbye, U. CO2 Sorption on MgO and CaO Surfaces: A Comparative Quantum Chemical Cluster Study. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 16774–16781 (2005)

    2005

  123. [218]

    Physisorbed and chemisorbed CO 2 at surface and step sites of the MgO(100) surface

    Pacchioni, G. Physisorbed and chemisorbed CO 2 at surface and step sites of the MgO(100) surface. Surf. Sci. 281, 207–219 (1993)

    1993

  124. [219]

    & Minot, C

    Hammami, R., Dhouib, A., Fernandez, S. & Minot, C. CO 2 adsorption on (001) surfaces of metal monoxides with rock-salt structure. Catal. Today 139, 227–233 (2008)

    2008

  125. [220]

    & Lauron-Pernot, H

    Cornu, D., Guesmi, H., Krafft, J.-M. & Lauron-Pernot, H. Lewis Acido-Basic Interactions between CO2 and MgO Surface: DFT and DRIFT Approaches. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 6645–6654 (2012)

    2012

  126. [221]

    A., Dheer, L., Rai, S., Shetty, S

    Manae, M. A., Dheer, L., Rai, S., Shetty, S. & Waghmare, U. V. Activation of CO 2 and CH4 on MgO surfaces: Mechanistic insights from first-principles theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 1415–1423 (2022)

    2022

  127. [222]

    & Orlando, R

    Baltrusaitis, J., Hatch, C. & Orlando, R. Periodic DFT Study of Acidic Trace Atmospheric Gas Molecule Adsorption on Ca- and Fe-Doped MgO(001) Surface Basic Sites. J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 7950–7958 (2012)

    2012

  128. [223]

    A., Sokol, A

    Downing, C. A., Sokol, A. A. & Catlow, C. R. A. The reactivity of CO 2 on the MgO(100) surface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 184–195 (2013)

    2013

  129. [224]

    & Levchenko, S

    Mazheika, A. & Levchenko, S. V. Ni Substitutional Defects in Bulk and at the (001) Surface of MgO from First-Principles Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 26934–26944 (2016)

    2016

  130. [225]

    & Ito, T

    Yanagisawa, Y., Takaoka, K., Yamabe, S. & Ito, T. Interaction of CO 2 with Magnesium Oxide Surfaces: A TPD, FTIR, and Cluster-Model Calculation Study. J. Phys. Chem. 99, 3704–3710 (1995)

    1995

  131. [226]

    & Tashiro, T

    Ito, T., Kobayashi, H. & Tashiro, T. Roles of low-coordinated surface ions in adsorption of gases on MgO. Nouv. Cim. D 19, 1695–1705 (1997)

    1997

  132. [227]

    & Wilcox, J

    McQueen, N., Kelemen, P., Dipple, G., Renforth, P. & Wilcox, J. Ambient weathering of magnesium oxide for CO2 removal from air. Nat. Commun. 11, 3299 (2020)

    2020

  133. [228]

    & M¨ uller, C

    Donat, F. & M¨ uller, C. R. Prospects of MgO-based sorbents for CO 2 capture applications at high temperatures. Curr. Opin. Green Sustainable Chem. 36, 100645 (2022)

    2022

  134. [229]

    Fu, Y., Zhang, L., Yue, B., Chen, X. & He, H. Simultaneous Characterization of Solid Acidity and Basicity of Metal Oxide Catalysts via the Solid-State NMR Technique. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 103 24094–24102 (2018)

    2018

  135. [230]

    Du, J.-H. et al. Identification of CO 2 adsorption sites on MgO nanosheets by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 13, 707 (2022)

    2022

  136. [231]

    & Freund, H.-J

    Wichtendahl, R., Rodriguez-Rodrigo, M., H¨ artel, U., Kuhlenbeck, H. & Freund, H.-J. Thermodes- orption of CO and NO from Vacuum-Cleaved NiO(100) and MgO(100). Phys. Status Solidi A 173, 93–100 (1999)

    1999

  137. [232]

    Di Valentin, C. et al. NO Monomers on MgO Powders and Thin Films. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 1637–1645 (2002)

    2002

  138. [233]

    E., Spoto, G

    Platero, E. E., Spoto, G. & Zecchina, A. Spectroscopic study of NO adsorption on magnesium oxide, nickel oxide and their solid solutions. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 81, 1283–1294 (1985)

    1985

  139. [234]

    Gold Standard

    Kubas, A. et al. Surface Adsorption Energetics Studied with “Gold Standard” Wave-Function-Based Ab Initio Methods: Small-Molecule Binding to TiO 2(110). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 4207–4212 (2016)

    2016

  140. [235]

    C., Lee, J., Al-Saidi, W

    Sorescu, D. C., Lee, J., Al-Saidi, W. A. & Jordan, K. D. CO 2 adsorption on TiO2(110) rutile: Insight from dispersion-corrected density functional theory calculations and scanning tunneling microscopy experiments. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 104707 (2011)

    2011

  141. [236]

    C., Deng, X

    Lee, J., Sorescu, D. C., Deng, X. & Jordan, K. D. Diffusion of CO 2 on the Rutile TiO 2(110) Surface. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 3114–3117 (2011)

    2011

  142. [237]

    Lin, X. et al. Structure and Dynamics of CO 2 on Rutile TiO 2(110)-1×1. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 26322–26334 (2012)

    2012

  143. [238]

    Cao, Y., Hu, S., Yu, M., Yan, S. & Xu, M. Adsorption and interaction of CO 2 on rutile TiO 2(110) surfaces: A combined UHV-FTIRS and theoretical simulation study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 23994–24000 (2015)

    2015

  144. [239]

    Hamlyn, R

    E. Hamlyn, R. C. et al. Imaging the ordering of a weakly adsorbed two-dimensional conden- sate: Ambient-pressure microscopy and spectroscopy of CO 2 molecules on rutile TiO 2 (110). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 13122–13126 (2018)

    2018

  145. [240]

    C., Lee, J., Al-Saidi, W

    Sorescu, D. C., Lee, J., Al-Saidi, W. A. & Jordan, K. D. Coadsorption properties of CO 2 and H2O on TiO2 rutile (110): A dispersion-corrected DFT study. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 074704 (2012)

    2012

  146. [241]

    Scagnelli, A., Valentin, C. D. & Pacchioni, G. Catalytic dissociation of N 2O on pure and Ni-doped MgO surfaces. Surf. Sci. 600, 386–394 (2006)

    2006

  147. [242]

    & Maschio, L

    Huesges, Z., M¨ uller, C., Paulus, B. & Maschio, L. Dispersion corrected DFT calculations for the adsorption of N 2O on MgO. Surf. Sci. 627, 11–15 (2014)

    2014

  148. [243]

    & Roetti, C

    Causa, M., Kotomin, E., Pisani, C. & Roetti, C. The MgO(110) surface and CO adsorption thereon. II. CO adsorption. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 20, 4991 (1987)

    1987

  149. [244]

    & Bagus, P

    Pacchioni, G., Cogliandro, G. & Bagus, P. S. Molecular orbital cluster model study of bonding and vibrations of CO adsorbed on MgO surface. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 42, 1115–1139 (1992)

    1992

  150. [245]

    Molecular-dynamics simulation of methane adsorbed on MgO: Evidence for a Kosterlitz- Thouless transition

    Alavi, A. Molecular-dynamics simulation of methane adsorbed on MgO: Evidence for a Kosterlitz- Thouless transition. Mol. Phys. 71, 1173–1191 (1990)

    1990

  151. [246]

    Todnem, K., Børve, K. J. & Nygren, M. Molecular adsorption of methane and methyl onto MgO(100) 104 An embedded-cluster study. Surf. Sci. 421, 296–307 (1999)

    1999

  152. [247]

    L., Sumpter, B

    Drummond, M. L., Sumpter, B. G., Shelton, W. A. & Larese, J. Z. Density functional investigation of the adsorption of a methane monolayer on an MgO(100) surface. Phys. Rev. B 73, 195313 (2006)

    2006

  153. [248]

    Z., Hastings, J

    Larese, J. Z., Hastings, J. M., Passell, L., Smith, D. & Richter, D. Rotational tunneling of methane on MgO surfaces: A neutron scattering study. J. Chem. Phys. 95, 6997–7000 (1991)

    1991

  154. [249]

    Z., y Marero, D

    Larese, J. Z., y Marero, D. M., Sivia, D. S. & Carlile, C. J. Tracking the Evolution of Interatomic Potentials with High Resolution Inelastic Neutron Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206102 (2001)

    2001

  155. [250]

    & Sauer, J

    Tosoni, S. & Sauer, J. Accurate quantum chemical energies for the interaction of hydrocarbons with oxide surfaces: CH 4/MgO(001). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 14330–14340 (2010)

    2010

  156. [251]

    & Suzanne, J

    Sidoumou, M., Angot, T. & Suzanne, J. Ethane adsorbed on MgO(100) single crystal surfaces: A high resolution LEED study. Surf. Sci. 272, 347–351 (1992)

    1992

  157. [252]

    Hoang, P. N. M., Girardet, C., Sidoumou, M. & Suzanne, J. Structure of ethane monolayers adsorbed on MgO(100): Experiments and calculations. Phys. Rev. B 48, 12183–12192 (1993)

    1993

  158. [253]

    & Coulomb, J

    Trabelsi, M., Saidi, S. & Coulomb, J. P. Structural study of C 2D6 thin films adsorbed on MgO(100). Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 53, 748–752 (2015)

    2015

  159. [254]

    Alessio, M., Bischoff, F. A. & Sauer, J. Chemically accurate adsorption energies for methane and ethane monolayers on the MgO(001) surface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 9760–9769 (2018)

    2018

  160. [255]

    Bligaard, T. et al. Toward Benchmarking in Catalysis Science: Best Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities. ACS Catal. 6, 2590–2602 (2016)

    2016

  161. [256]

    ˇRez´ aˇ c, J., Riley, K. E. & Hobza, P. S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 2427–2438 (2011)

    2011

  162. [257]

    Goerigk, L. et al. A look at the density functional theory zoo with the advanced GMTKN55 database for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics and noncovalent interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 32184–32215 (2017)

    2017

  163. [258]

    & Kresse, G

    Klimeˇ s, J., Kaltak, M., Maggio, E. & Kresse, G. Singles correlation energy contributions in solids. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 102816 (2015)

    2015

  164. [259]

    & Kresse, G

    Kaltak, M., Klimeˇ s, J. & Kresse, G. Cubic scaling algorithm for the random phase approximation: Self-interstitials and vacancies in Si. Phys. Rev. B 90, 054115 (2014)

    2014

  165. [260]

    Bajdich, M., Nørskov, J. K. & Vojvodic, A. Surface energetics of alkaline-earth metal oxides: Trends in stability and adsorption of small molecules. Phys. Rev. B 91, 155401 (2015)

    2015

  166. [261]

    Hydrog´ enations et d´ eshydrog´ enations par catalyse.Ber

    Sabatier, P. Hydrog´ enations et d´ eshydrog´ enations par catalyse.Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 44, 1984– 2001 (1911)

    1911

  167. [262]

    Ab Initio Calculations for Molecule–Surface Interactions with Chemical Accuracy

    Sauer, J. Ab Initio Calculations for Molecule–Surface Interactions with Chemical Accuracy. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 3502–3510 (2019)

    2019

  168. [263]

    & Sauer, J

    Berger, F., Rybicki, M. & Sauer, J. Molecular Dynamics with Chemical Accuracy-Alkane Adsorption in Acidic Zeolites. ACS Catal. 13, 2011–2024 (2023)

    2023

  169. [264]

    Xia, C. et al. Emerging cocatalysts in TiO 2-based photocatalysts for light-driven catalytic hydrogen evolution: Progress and perspectives. Fuel 307, 121745 (2022). 105

    2022

  170. [265]

    & Domen, K

    Wang, Q. & Domen, K. Particulate Photocatalysts for Light-Driven Water Splitting: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Design Strategies. Chem. Rev. 120, 919–985 (2020)

    2020

  171. [266]

    Wang, S. et al. Highly Efficient One-pot Electrosynthesis of Oxime Ethers from NOx over Ultrafine MgO Nanoparticles Derived from Mg-based Metal-Organic Frameworks. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63, e202405553 (2024)

    2024

  172. [267]

    Campbell, C. T. & Sellers, J. R. V. Enthalpies and Entropies of Adsorption on Well-Defined Oxide Surfaces: Experimental Measurements. Chem. Rev. 113, 4106–4135 (2013)

    2013

  173. [268]

    & Plesset, M

    Møller, Chr. & Plesset, M. S. Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems. Phys. Rev. 46, 618–622 (1934)

    1934

  174. [269]

    W., Pople, J

    Raghavachari, K., Trucks, G. W., Pople, J. A. & Head-Gordon, M. A fifth-order perturbation com- parison of electron correlation theories. Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 479–483 (1989)

    1989

  175. [270]

    & Riplinger, C

    Neese, F., Wennmohs, F., Becker, U. & Riplinger, C. The ORCA quantum chemistry program package. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 224108 (2020)

    2020

  176. [271]

    The MRCC program system: Accurate quantum chemistry from water to proteins

    K´ allay, M.et al. The MRCC program system: Accurate quantum chemistry from water to proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074107 (2020)

    2020

  177. [272]

    R., Samu, G

    Nagy, P. R., Samu, G. & K´ allay, M. Optimization of the Linear-Scaling Local Natural Orbital CCSD(T) Method: Improved Algorithm and Benchmark Applications. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 4193–4215 (2018)

    2018

  178. [273]

    Nagy, P. R. & K´ allay, M. Approaching the Basis Set Limit of CCSD(T) Energies for Large Molecules with Local Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 5275–5298 (2019)

    2019

  179. [275]

    & Neese, F

    Riplinger, C., Sandhoefer, B., Hansen, A. & Neese, F. Natural triple excitations in local coupled cluster calculations with pair natural orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 134101 (2013)

    2013

  180. [276]

    & Neese, F

    Riplinger, C. & Neese, F. An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 034106 (2013)

    2013

  181. [277]

    Riplinger, C., Pinski, P., Becker, U., Valeev, E. F. & Neese, F. Sparse maps—A systematic infras- tructure for reduced-scaling electronic structure methods. II. Linear scaling domain based pair natural orbital coupled cluster theory. J. Chem. Phys. 144, 024109 (2016)

    2016

  182. [278]

    Peterson, K. A. & Dunning, T. H. Accurate correlation consistent basis sets for molecular core– valence correlation effects: The second row atoms Al–Ar, and the first row atoms B–Ne revisited. J. Chem. Phys. 117, 10548–10560 (2002)

    2002

  183. [279]

    Balabanov, N. B. & Peterson, K. A. Systematically convergent basis sets for transition metals. I. All-electron correlation consistent basis sets for the 3d elements Sc–Zn. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 064107 (2005)

    2005

  184. [280]

    Bistoni, G. et al. Treating Subvalence Correlation Effects in Domain Based Pair Natural Orbital Coupled Cluster Calculations: An Out-of-the-Box Approach. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3220– 106 3227 (2017)

    2017

  185. [281]

    & Valeev, E

    Neese, F. & Valeev, E. F. Revisiting the Atomic Natural Orbital Approach for Basis Sets: Ro- bust Systematic Basis Sets for Explicitly Correlated and Conventional Correlated ab initio Methods? J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 33–43 (2011)

    2011

  186. [282]

    & Ahlrichs, R

    Weigend, F., H¨ aser, M., Patzelt, H. & Ahlrichs, R. RI-MP2: Optimized auxiliary basis sets and demonstration of efficiency. Chem. Phys. Lett. 294, 143–152 (1998)

    1998

  187. [283]

    & Klopper, W

    Hellweg, A., H¨ attig, C., H¨ ofener, S. & Klopper, W. Optimized accurate auxiliary basis sets for RI-MP2 and RI-CC2 calculations for the atoms Rb to Rn. Theor. Chem. Acc. 117, 587–597 (2007)

    2007

  188. [284]

    L., Auer, A

    Stoychev, G. L., Auer, A. A. & Neese, F. Automatic Generation of Auxiliary Basis Sets. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 554–562 (2017)

    2017

  189. [285]

    Straightforward and Accurate Automatic Auxiliary Basis Set Generation for Molecular Calculations with Atomic Orbital Basis Sets

    Lehtola, S. Straightforward and Accurate Automatic Auxiliary Basis Set Generation for Molecular Calculations with Atomic Orbital Basis Sets. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 6886–6900 (2021)

    2021

  190. [286]

    Shi, B. X. et al. General embedded cluster protocol for accurate modeling of oxygen vacancies in metal-oxides. J. Chem. Phys. 156, 124704 (2022)

    2022

  191. [287]

    Shi, B. X. et al. Many-Body Methods for Surface Chemistry Come of Age: Achieving Consensus with Experiments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 25372–25381 (2023)

    2023

  192. [288]

    Pacchioni, G., Bagus, P. S. & Parmigiani, F. Cluster Models for Surface and Bulk Phenomena (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  193. [289]

    Lu, Y. et al. Multiscale QM/MM modelling of catalytic systems with ChemShell. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 21816–21835 (2023)

    2023

  194. [290]

    D., Needs, R

    Drummond, N. D., Needs, R. J., Sorouri, A. & Foulkes, W. M. C. Finite-size errors in continuum quantum Monte Carlo calculations. Phys. Rev. B 78, 125106 (2008)

    2008

  195. [291]

    Al-Hamdani, Y. S. Theoretical Approach towards Accurate Molecular Interactions with Low Dimensional Substrates. Doctoral, UCL (University College London) (2016)

    2016

  196. [292]

    Al-Hamdani, Y. S. et al. Properties of the water to boron nitride interaction: From zero to two dimensions with benchmark accuracy. J. Chem. Phys. 147, 044710 (2017)

    2017

  197. [293]

    & Pacchioni, G

    Bredow, T., Giordano, L., Cinquini, F. & Pacchioni, G. Electronic properties of rutile TiO 2 ultrathin films: Odd-even oscillations with the number of layers. Phys. Rev. B 70, 035419 (2004)

    2004

  198. [294]

    Svensson, M. et al. ONIOM: A Multilayered Integrated MO + MM Method for Geometry Optimiza- tions and Single Point Energy Predictions. A Test for Diels-Alder Reactions and Pt(P( t-Bu)3)2 + H2 Oxidative Addition. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19357–19363 (1996)

    1996

  199. [295]

    Pople, J. A. Quantum Chemical Models (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 1894–1902 (1999)

    1999

  200. [296]

    Tsatsoulis, T. et al. A comparison between quantum chemistry and quantum Monte Carlo techniques for the adsorption of water on the (001) LiH surface. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 204108 (2017)

    2017

  201. [297]

    G., Vogt, J

    Cabello-Cartagena, A. G., Vogt, J. & Weiss, H. Structure and infrared absorption of the first layer C2H2 on the NaCl(100) single-crystal surface. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 074706 (2010)

    2010

  202. [298]

    Dunn, S. K. & Ewing, G. E. Infrared spectra and structure of acetylene on sodium chloride (100). 107 J. Phys. Chem. 96, 5284–5290 (1992)

    1992

  203. [299]

    Quantum ab initio study of acetylene adsorption on NaCl(100) I

    Allouche, A. Quantum ab initio study of acetylene adsorption on NaCl(100) I. Topology and adsorption energy. Surf. Sci. 374, 117–124 (1997)

    1997

  204. [300]

    Picaud, S. et al. Phonon-libron dynamics of acetylene adsorbed on NaCl(001). Phys. Rev. B 57, 10090–10099 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.