Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Meson correlators in 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs and hints for 8d structures at weak coupling

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read All one-loop $n$-point meson correlators in two $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs are packaged by a single 8d generating function.

desk verdict Solid one-loop meson correlator computations for two N=2 SCFTs, with a clean 8d generating-function packaging; the all-n and D4-universality claims are extrapolations from low points and should be flagged as such. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17260 v1 pith:VIL4WIFK submitted 2024-12-23 hep-th

classification hep-th
keywords mesoncorrelatorsN=2superconformalfieldtheoriesone-loopcorrectionshiddenconformalsymmetryeight-dimensionalstructuregeneratingfunctionsplanarlarge-NlimitD4theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies correlation functions of half-BPS meson operators—products of a quark and an antiquark with any number of gluon-field insertions—in two four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal gauge theories at weak coupling. It claims that the one-loop corrections to all $n$-point correlators of these operators, with arbitrary conformal dimensions, are built from a single four-point interaction seed dressed by planar Wick contractions (pairwise gluon-field propagators) of the gluon fields. When summed over operator dimensions, the corrections resum into generating functions in which spacetime distances $x^2_{ij}$ and internal distances $t_{ij}$ merge into an 8-dimensional distance $X^2_{ij}=x^2_{ij}-t_{ij}$, the same emergent structure previously seen at strong coupling through AdS/CFT. The two theories—$\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM coupled to fundamental hypermultiplets and the D4 USp($2N$) theory—produce identical one-loop corrections, which the paper takes as evidence for universality. If the claim holds, all one-loop dynamical information in these meson sectors is contained in the four-point function of the lowest-dimension operators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is $\bar H_{ij,kl}$, the one-loop four-point building block obtained from the exchange-plus-contact combination $H_{ij,kl}$ by removing the boundary $q\bar q$ contractions. Kinematically $\bar H$ is proportional to the scalar one-loop box integral $\mathcal{X}_{1234}$, so no new integral appears at higher points. Two identities make the factorization work: the replacement $x^2_{ij}\to X^2_{ij}=x^2_{ij}-t_{ij}$ upgrades every boundary propagator and the box integral to 8d objects, and a four-$\varphi$ contact interaction effectively splits into a sum of two Wick-contraction pairings, which is what lets the dressing picture close. The geometric sums $\sum_{b\ge 0}(t_{ij}/x^2_{ij})^b=x^2_{ij}/X^2_{ij}$ and $\sum_{b\ge 1}(t_{ij}/x^2_{ij})^b=t_{ij}/X^2_{ij}$ resum the $\varphi$ dressings, while, for six or more points, the functions $W^{(\kappa)}_{i,i+1,\ldots,j}$ enumerate all planar partitions of the white regions and exclude incompatible simultaneous contractions such as $(24)$ and $(35)$. These rules convert every one-loop diagram into a product of $\bar H$ with Wick-contraction factors, which is why the full $n$-point correlator factorizes.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop seven-point correlator $\langle 2222222\rangle$ directly from Feynman diagrams in the D4 theory and compare it with the generating function (4.28); any mismatch would show that the all-$n$ formula and the claimed D4 universality fail beyond $n=6$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is the compact four-point formula $G_4=\lambda R \mathcal{X}_{1234}/(X^2_{12}X^2_{23}X^2_{34}X^2_{41})$, where $X^2_{ij}=x^2_{ij}-t_{ij}$ and $\mathcal{X}_{1234}$ is the scalar one-loop box integral written in these 8d distances. From this seed, the paper derives a generating function for arbitrary four-point meson correlators: $\langle p_1p_2p_3p_4\rangle$ is proportional to $\langle 2222\rangle$ with a factor given by all planar $\varphi$-field Wick contractions satisfying the weight constraints $p_i=2+b_{i-1,i}+b_{i,i+1}$. The paper extends this to $n$ points with the effective rule that the one-loop interaction always acts through the building block $\bar H_{ij,kl}$ on four external points at a time, while every other $\varphi$ field contributes as a planar Wick contraction within the regions that $\bar H$ carves out; these contractions are enumerated by the functions $W^{(\kappa)}_{i,i+1,\ldots,j}$. The resulting $n$-point generating function (4.28) is claimed to hold for arbitrary $n$, and the paper finds that the D4 theory has identical one-loop corrections, verified explicitly for $n=4,5,6$; the generating functions are also checked to obey the chiral algebra (holomorphy) condition up to $n=6$.

Load-bearing premise

The rules learned from four-, five-, and six-point examples are assumed to hold for all larger $n$, and the D4 theory is assumed to match the SU($N_f$) theory beyond the cases explicitly checked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every one-loop $n$-point meson correlator in these theories is determined by the four-point seed $\bar H$ together with a sum over planar $\varphi$-field Wick contractions; no new one-loop integral appears for $n>4$.
  • The generating function (3.31) gives an explicit extraction recipe for any $\langle p_1\cdots p_n\rangle$ by expanding in $t_{ij}$ with the weights fixed by the $p_i$, so arbitrary-dimension correlators are all packaged in one object.
  • Because the D4 theory reproduces the same one-loop corrections, the 8d structure is not particular to the SU($N_f$) construction; the paper expects it to extend to other weakly coupled $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs with a marginal coupling.
  • The generating functions satisfy the chiral algebra (holomorphy) condition at least up to $n=6$, a nontrivial consistency check beyond the Feynman-diagram computation.
  • The weak-coupling 8d structure matches the strong-coupling AdS$_5\times S^3$ supergluon structure and parallels the 10d structure of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM, suggesting that hidden higher-dimensional conformal symmetry is a genuine property of these correlators across regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the all-$n$ rule holds, one-loop meson correlators are four-point complete: the four-point function of the lowest-dimension mesons supplies all dynamical data, and higher-point correlators are fixed combinatorially, making the one-loop sector extremely predictive and suggesting a similar compression may exist at higher loops.
  • The D4 universality claim currently rests on $n=4,5,6$ examples; an explicit diagram-to-diagram map between the two Lagrangians would convert this observed coincidence into a proof and might reveal a symmetry behind it.
  • The $W$-function partition enumeration resembles counting noncrossing planar partitions of polygons; identifying it with a known combinatorial family could yield a closed all-$n$ expression for the generating function and clarify why the trivial partition plus $P^{(1)}$ terms close.
  • A concrete two-loop test using Lagrangian insertion would show whether the 8d structure persists beyond one loop, as the 10d structure does in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes one-loop planar corrections to n-point correlators of half-BPS meson operators in two weakly coupled 4d N=2 SCFTs: N=4 SYM coupled to Nf fundamental hypermultiplets (T1), and the USp(2N) D4 theory with SO(8) flavor symmetry (T2). The main results are generating functions for these correlators: the four-point function is packaged in Eq. (3.31) as G4 = λ R X1234 / (X12^2 X23^2 X34^2 X41^2) with the 8d distances Xij^2 = xij^2 − tij, and the n-point generalization is proposed in Eq. (4.28) in terms of H functions and W functions that resum planar φ Wick contractions. The authors verify low-point examples explicitly against Feynman diagrams, check the superconformal Ward identity for four-point functions, and check the chiral algebra condition up to n=6. They further claim that the D4 theory has identical one-loop meson correlators to T1, based on n=4,5,6 examples.

Significance. If the all-n formula (4.28) and the D4 universality claim hold, the paper establishes a weak-coupling analogue of the hidden 8d structures previously found at strong coupling, with a compact seed (the four-point H insertion) plus planar Wick dressings. The explicit four- and five-point computations are valuable, the four-point generating function is a parameter-free, closed-form result, and the chiral algebra and Ward identity checks provide nontrivial consistency evidence. The paper is clearly written and the diagrammatic intuition is compelling. However, the all-n extrapolation and the D4 universality claim are load-bearing and, as presented, are not proven; the low-n seed results are not affected by these gaps.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (4.28)] The all-n generating function is asserted by saying that the generalization to arbitrarily many points is immediate, but W functions are defined by partition enumeration and are listed explicitly only through five-vertex regions in (4.27d). No argument is given that every planar one-loop diagram for n ≥ 7 reduces to a single four-point H insertion dressed by tree-level propagators and W contractions, nor that the partition enumeration in W (4.26) exhausts all non-crossing planar contraction systems in a white region with six or more vertices. A direct seven-point check or an inductive proof is needed; as written, Eq. (4.28) is an extrapolation from n = 4, 5, 6.
  2. [§5, footnotes 9–11] The D4 universality claim is not supported by a proof: the paper explicitly declines a general diagram-to-diagram map and infers identical corrections from n = 4, 5, 6 examples. Footnote 10 even concedes that for n = 4 the equality is forced by superconformal Ward identities, so the four-point case is not an independent test. Moreover, footnote 11 states that there is an additional overall factor 2^{2−n/2} between the two theories; this appears to contradict the phrase 'fully agree' and the claim that the corrections are identical, unless the factor is absorbed into operator normalization. The claim needs either a proof of a precise diagram-to-diagram correspondence, or a carefully qualified statement of the residual normalization and of the range of n for which single-trace partial correlators remain well defined given the SO(8) trace degeneracy noted in footnote 9.
  3. [§4.2, chiral algebra check] The chiral algebra consistency condition is explicitly checked only up to n = 6, while Eq. (4.28) is claimed for arbitrary n. This is a useful check of the six-point generating function but does not establish the all-n formula; the paper should either extend the check or state clearly that the all-n statement is a conjecture supported by low-point evidence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] 'Resumed' should be 'resummed' in the abstract and in several places (e.g., Section 3.4 and Section 4).
  2. [Appendix B] There is a typo: 'invriant' should be 'invariant' in the sentence introducing the N=2 supersymmetry condition.
  3. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.26)] The notation W(κ)_{i,i+1,...j} uses an ellipsis that is ambiguous for arbitrary regions; it would help to define the vertex set as {i, i+1, ..., j} explicitly and to specify the role of κ in the text.
  4. [Section 3.3] The phrase 'the b summation is performed over all solutions to' is grammatically awkward; consider 'the sum over b is over all non-negative integer solutions to (3.27)'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: one-loop meson correlators are computed from the Lagrangian by explicit Feynman diagrams, and the 8d generating functions are resummations rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central results are derived rather than assumed. The four-point generating function (3.31) is obtained by summing the explicitly computed diagrammatic results (3.8)-(3.23) and then performing the exact geometric-series resummation (3.28)-(3.30); the extraction formula (3.32) inverts the sum, so the resummation is a packaging identity and not a new input. No parameter is fitted to any correlator: the only overall constant is the 't Hooft coupling λ inherited from the Lagrangian. The higher-point formulas are supported by explicit Feynman-diagram computations at n=5 and n=6 (e.g., (4.14) and (4.25)) and by chiral-algebra checks up to n=6. The all-n formula (4.28) and the D4 universality claim rest on an inductive generalization (Section 4.2 says the generalization is "immediate"; Section 5 explicitly declines a general diagram-to-diagram map and infers from n=4,5,6), so those are unproven extrapolations that raise a correctness/completeness risk, but they are not circular reductions: the n>6 and D4 conclusions are not identical to their inputs by construction. Self-citations such as [6], [21], and [27] supply motivation and computational technique, not the target one-loop result, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion. The one-loop integrands are exhibited explicitly, making the 8d structure a computed property rather than a renamed known pattern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation uses standard Lagrangian input and Feynman rules; no parameter is fitted to any data. The results depend on six modeling assumptions, of which the two fragile ones are the completeness of the all-n diagram-dressing rule and the D4 equivalence inferred from low-point examples. These are explicitly acknowledged in the paper.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Planar large-N limit with single-trace flavor dominance is the only surviving contribution to meson correlators.
    Used throughout; Section 2.2 argues color/flavor flow competition suppresses higher-trace terms at leading 1/N, and only planar diagrams inside the flavor polygon are kept.
  • domain assumption Non-conformal Y integrals cancel from final one-loop correlators, so diagrams with self-energy and corner corrections can be dropped.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 after Eq. (3.6); the paper states the cancellation was verified but does not display the cancellation.
  • standard math Superconformal Ward identity and chiral algebra solution forms, such as Eq. (2.14) with the R factor, apply to these correlators and constrain the answer.
    Uses results from Beem et al. and Nirschl-Osborn to impose meromorphicity (2.13) and to check consistency.
  • domain assumption For T1, exact conformality holds in the quenched limit Nf/N tending to 0 with Nf fixed as N tends to infinity.
    Stated in the introduction and used to justify computing conformal correlators in that theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The complete set of one-loop planar diagrams for all n is captured by the elementary Type-I/II/III diagrams dressed by phi Wick contractions, and the partition enumeration in W functions remains valid for n>=7.
    Established explicitly for n=4,5,6; the paper extrapolates to arbitrary n in Section 4.2 without a general proof.
  • ad hoc to paper The D4 theory has one-loop meson correlators identical to the SU(Nf) theory for all n.
    Inferred in Section 5 from matching n=4,5,6 examples; the paper explicitly declines a general diagram-to-diagram proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Meson correlators in 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFTs and hints for 8d structures at weak coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VIL4WIFK

@misc{pith2026241217260,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Meson correlators in 4d $\mathcalN=2$ SCFTs and hints for 8d structures at weak coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VIL4WIFK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17260}
}
abstract

We study correlators of $\frac{1}{2}$-BPS mesons in two examples of 4d SQCDs with $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal symmetry in the planar limit. We focus on the weakly coupled regime and obtain one-loop corrections to $n$-point meson correlators with arbitrary operator dimensions. We show that these corrections can be resumed into generating functions which exhibit emergent 8d structures similar to the ones previously observed at strong coupling via AdS/CFT. These structures of the $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories also resemble the hidden 10d structures in 4d $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higher-Point Correlators in N=4 SYM: Ten-Dimensional Null Polygons

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A general two-loop formula is obtained for all n-point 10d null polygon correlators in planar N=4 SYM, expressed in a conformal-integral basis and verified numerically at 11 points.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Mellin amplitudes for AdS5 ×S5,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “Mellin amplitudes for AdS5 ×S5,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 9, (2017) 091602 , arXiv:1608.06624 [hep-th]

  2. [2]

    How to Succeed at Holographic Correlator s Without Really Trying,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “How to Succeed at Holographic Correlator s Without Really Trying,” JHEP 04 (2018) 014 , arXiv:1710.05923 [hep-th]

  3. [3]

    AdS3 × S3 Tree-Level Correlators: Hidden Six-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,

    L. Rastelli, K. Roumpedakis, and X. Zhou, “ AdS3 × S3 Tree-Level Correlators: Hidden Six-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,” JHEP 10 (2019) 140 , arXiv:1905.11983 [hep-th]

  4. [4]

    All Tree-Level Correlators for M-theor y on AdS7 ×S4,

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou, “All Tree-Level Correlators for M-theor y on AdS7 ×S4,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 13, (2020) 131604 , arXiv:2006.06653 [hep-th] . – 33 –

  5. [5]

    All Holographic Four-Point Functions in All M aximally Supersymmetric CFTs,

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou, “All Holographic Four-Point Functions in All M aximally Supersymmetric CFTs,” Phys. Rev. X 11 no. 1, (2021) 011056 , arXiv:2006.12505 [hep-th]

  6. [6]

    Gluon Scattering in AdS from CFT,

    L. F. Alday, C. Behan, P. Ferrero, and X. Zhou, “Gluon Scattering in AdS from CFT,” JHEP 06 (2021) 020 , arXiv:2103.15830 [hep-th]

  7. [7]

    Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 01 (2018) 035 , arXiv:1706.02822 [hep-th]

  8. [8]

    Unmixing Supergr avity,

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Unmixing Supergr avity,” JHEP 02 (2018) 133 , arXiv:1706.08456 [hep-th]

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    On genus-one string amplitudes on AdS5 ×S5,

    L. F. Alday, “On genus-one string amplitudes on AdS5 ×S5,” JHEP 04 (2021) 005 , arXiv:1812.11783 [hep-th]

  2. [10]

    One-loop amplitudes in AdS5 ×S5 supergravity from N = 4 SYM at strong coupling,

    F. Aprile, J. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “One-loop amplitudes in AdS5 ×S5 supergravity from N = 4 SYM at strong coupling,” JHEP 03 (2020) 190 , arXiv:1912.01047 [hep-th]

  3. [11]

    Simplicity of AdS Supergravity at One Loop,

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou, “Simplicity of AdS Supergravity at One Loop,” JHEP 09 (2020) 008 , arXiv:1912.02663 [hep-th]

  4. [12]

    One-loop gluon amplitudes in AdS,

    L. F. Alday, A. Bissi, and X. Zhou, “One-loop gluon amplitudes in AdS,” JHEP 02 (2022) 105 , arXiv:2110.09861 [hep-th]

  5. [13]

    Graviton scattering in AdS 5× S5 at two loops,

    Z. Huang and E. Y. Yuan, “Graviton scattering in AdS 5× S5 at two loops,” JHEP 04 (2023) 064 , arXiv:2112.15174 [hep-th]

  6. [14]

    Two-loop supergravity on AdS5 ×S5 from CFT,

    J. M. Drummond and H. Paul, “Two-loop supergravity on AdS5 ×S5 from CFT,” JHEP 08 (2022) 275 , arXiv:2204.01829 [hep-th]

  7. [15]

    20 ′ Five-Point Function from AdS5 ×S5 Supergravity,

    V. Gon¸ calves, R. Pereira, and X. Zhou, “20 ′ Five-Point Function from AdS5 ×S5 Supergravity,” JHEP 10 (2019) 247 , arXiv:1906.05305 [hep-th]

  8. [16]

    Supersymmetric Five-Po int Gluon Amplitudes in AdS Space,

    L. F. Alday, V. Gon¸ calves, and X. Zhou, “Supersymmetric Five-Po int Gluon Amplitudes in AdS Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 16, (2022) 161601 , arXiv:2201.04422 [hep-th]

  9. [17]

    Kaluza-Klein five-point functions from AdS 5× S5 supergravity,

    V. Gon¸ calves, C. Meneghelli, R. Pereira, J. Vilas Boas, and X. Zhou, “Kaluza-Klein five-point functions from AdS 5× S5 supergravity,” JHEP 08 (2023) 067 , arXiv:2302.01896 [hep-th]

  10. [18]

    Six-point AdS g luon amplitudes from flat space and factorization,

    L. F. Alday, V. Gon¸ calves, M. Nocchi, and X. Zhou, “Six-point AdS g luon amplitudes from flat space and factorization,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6 no. 1, (2024) L012041 , arXiv:2307.06884 [hep-th]

  11. [19]

    Constructibility of AdS Supergluon Amp litudes,

    Q. Cao, S. He, and Y. Tang, “Constructibility of AdS Supergluon Amp litudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 2, (2024) 021605 , arXiv:2312.15484 [hep-th]

  12. [20]

    Supergluon scattering in AdS: co nstructibility, spinning amplitudes, and new structures,

    Q. Cao, S. He, X. Li, and Y. Tang, “Supergluon scattering in AdS: co nstructibility, spinning amplitudes, and new structures,” arXiv:2406.08538 [hep-th]

  13. [21]

    All Five-point Kaluza -Klein Correlators and Hidden 8d Symmetry in AdS 5 × S3,

    Z. Huang, B. Wang, E. Y. Yuan, and J. Zhang, “All Five-point Kaluza -Klein Correlators and Hidden 8d Symmetry in AdS 5 × S3,” arXiv:2408.12260 [hep-th]

  14. [22]

    Selected topics in analytic conforma l bootstrap: A guided journey,

    A. Bissi, A. Sinha, and X. Zhou, “Selected topics in analytic conforma l bootstrap: A guided journey,” Phys. Rept. 991 (2022) 1–89 , arXiv:2202.08475 [hep-th]

  15. [23]

    All Tree-Level Correlators in AdS 5×S5 Supergravity: – 34 – Hidden Ten-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,

    S. Caron-Huot and A.-K. Trinh, “All Tree-Level Correlators in AdS 5×S5 Supergravity: – 34 – Hidden Ten-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,” JHEP 01 (2019) 196 , arXiv:1809.09173 [hep-th]

  16. [24]

    Double Copy Relation in AdS Space,

    X. Zhou, “Double Copy Relation in AdS Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 14, (2021) 141601 , arXiv:2106.07651 [hep-th]

  17. [25]

    How to Succeed at Witten Diagram Recursions without Rea lly Trying,

    X. Zhou, “How to Succeed at Witten Diagram Recursions without Rea lly Trying,” JHEP 08 (2020) 077 , arXiv:2005.03031 [hep-th]

  18. [26]

    More on holographic correlat ors: Twisted and dimensionally reduced structures,

    C. Behan, P. Ferrero, and X. Zhou, “More on holographic correlat ors: Twisted and dimensionally reduced structures,” JHEP 04 (2021) 008 , arXiv:2101.04114 [hep-th]

  19. [27]

    Ten dimensional symmetry of N = 4 SYM correlators,

    S. Caron-Huot and F. Coronado, “Ten dimensional symmetry of N = 4 SYM correlators,” JHEP 03 (2022) 151 , arXiv:2106.03892 [hep-th]

  20. [28]

    Bonus symmetries of N=4 superYang-Mills corre lation functions via AdS duality,

    K. A. Intriligator, “Bonus symmetries of N=4 superYang-Mills corre lation functions via AdS duality,” Nucl. Phys. B 551 (1999) 575–600 , arXiv:hep-th/9811047

  21. [29]

    Hidden symmetry of four-point correlation functions and amplitudes in N=4 SYM,

    B. Eden, P. Heslop, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Hidden symmetry of four-point correlation functions and amplitudes in N=4 SYM,” Nucl. Phys. B 862 (2012) 193–231 , arXiv:1108.3557 [hep-th]

  22. [30]

    Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,

    A. Karch and E. Katz, “Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,” JHEP 06 (2002) 043 , arXiv:hep-th/0205236

  23. [31]

    Large N superconformal gauge t heories and supergravity orientifolds,

    A. Fayyazuddin and M. Spalinski, “Large N superconformal gauge t heories and supergravity orientifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B 535 (1998) 219–232 , arXiv:hep-th/9805096

  24. [32]

    The Large N limit of N=2, N=1 field theories from three-branes in F theory,

    O. Aharony, A. Fayyazuddin, and J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of N=2, N=1 field theories from three-branes in F theory,” JHEP 07 (1998) 013 , arXiv:hep-th/9806159

  25. [33]

    Towards Bootstrapp ing F-theory,

    C. Behan, S. M. Chester, and P. Ferrero, “Towards Bootstrapp ing F-theory,” arXiv:2403.17049 [hep-th]

  26. [34]

    Gluon scattering in AdS at finite string coupling from localization,

    C. Behan, S. M. Chester, and P. Ferrero, “Gluon scattering in AdS at finite string coupling from localization,” JHEP 02 (2024) 042 , arXiv:2305.01016 [hep-th]

  27. [35]

    The AdS Ve neziano amplitude at small curvature,

    L. F. Alday, S. M. Chester, T. Hansen, and D.-l. Zhong, “The AdS Ve neziano amplitude at small curvature,” JHEP 05 (2024) 322 , arXiv:2403.13877 [hep-th]

  28. [36]

    The Structure of n-point functions of chiral primary operators in N=4 super Yang-Mills at one-loop,

    N. Drukker and J. Plefka, “The Structure of n-point functions of chiral primary operators in N=4 super Yang-Mills at one-loop,” JHEP 04 (2009) 001 , arXiv:0812.3341 [hep-th]

  29. [37]

    Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 336 no. 3, (2015) 1359–1433 , arXiv:1312.5344 [hep-th]

  30. [38]

    Superconformal Ward identities and th eir solution,

    M. Nirschl and H. Osborn, “Superconformal Ward identities and th eir solution,” Nucl. Phys. B 711 (2005) 409–479 , arXiv:hep-th/0407060

  31. [39]

    BMN correlators and operator mixing in N=4 superYang-Mills theory,

    N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen, J. Plefka, G. W. Semenoff, and M. Stau dacher, “BMN correlators and operator mixing in N=4 superYang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 125–161 , arXiv:hep-th/0208178

  32. [40]

    An Approach to the evaluat ion of three and four point ladder diagrams,

    N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, “An Approach to the evaluat ion of three and four point ladder diagrams,” Phys. Lett. B 298 (1993) 363–370

  33. [41]

    PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses,

    C. Duhr and F. Dulat, “PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses,” JHEP 08 (2019) 135 , arXiv:1904.07279 [hep-th] . – 35 –

  34. [42]

    Twistor Strings w ith Flavour,

    J. Bedford, C. Papageorgakis, and K. Zoubos, “Twistor Strings w ith Flavour,” JHEP 11 (2007) 088 , arXiv:0708.1248 [hep-th]

  35. [43]

    AdS super gluon scat tering up to two loops: a position space approach,

    Z. Huang, B. Wang, E. Y. Yuan, and X. Zhou, “AdS super gluon scat tering up to two loops: a position space approach,” JHEP 07 (2023) 053 , arXiv:2301.13240 [hep-th]

  36. [44]

    Simplicity of AdS super Yang-Mills at one loop,

    Z. Huang, B. Wang, E. Y. Yuan, and X. Zhou, “Simplicity of AdS super Yang-Mills at one loop,” JHEP 01 (2024) 190 , arXiv:2309.14413 [hep-th]

  37. [45]

    All Next-Next-to-Extremal One-Loop Correlators of AdS Supergluons and Supergravitons,

    Z. Huang, B. Wang, and E. Y. Yuan, “All Next-Next-to-Extremal One-Loop Correlators of AdS Supergluons and Supergravitons,” arXiv:2407.03408 [hep-th] . – 36 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.