Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Remark on the Emergence of Color Superconductivity for Gauge Theories in General Spacetime Dimensions from simple Holographic Models

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Generalizing holographic color superconductivity to arbitrary AdS dimension, the paper finds that only d=4 Einstein-Maxwell gravity can support the two-color N_c=2 phase and that d=4 has no confinement–deconfinement transition.

desk verdict The d-dimensional generalization is built on the wrong RN-AdS blackening function, so the d=4 phase-transition claim collapses, though the confining-phase setup and trial-function conditions are a reasonable starting point. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17875 v2 pith:V4X27Q4E submitted 2024-12-22 hep-th

Nguyen Hoang Vu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords colorsuperconductivityholographicmodelEinstein-MaxwellgravityAdS/CFTcorrespondenceconfinement-deconfinementtransitionReissner-Nordstrom-AdSblackholesolitonBreitenlohner-Freedmanbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the holographic description of color superconductivity—Cooper pairing of quarks at high density—from the usual six-dimensional anti-de Sitter (AdS) background to arbitrary bulk dimension d, with the boundary theory taken to be a confining SU(N_c) gauge theory. It claims that among all dimensions only the d=4 Einstein-Maxwell model can realize the two-color (N_c=2) superconducting phase, and that in d=4 the model has no confinement–deconfinement transition. The confinement phase is included by replacing the planar Reissner-Nordström-AdS black hole with an AdS soliton, and the paper derives bounds on N_c in both phases from the breaking of the Breitenlohner-Freedman stability bound for bulk scalar fields. The significance, if the claims hold, is a sharp dimension-by-dimension map of where holographic color superconductivity is possible with the simplest gravity-plus-Maxwell action.

What carries the argument

The central object is the proposed d-dimensional planar Reissner-Nordström-AdS blackening function f(r)=1-\left(1+\frac{3\$mu^{2}$}{8r_+^2}\right)\left(\frac{r_+}{r}\right)^{d-1}+\frac{3\$mu^{2}$ r_+^d}{$8r^{{d+2}}$}, together with its AdS-soliton counterpart f(r)=1-(r_0/r)^{d-1}. This function fixes the Hawking temperature T = r_+^2 f'(r_+)/(4\pi), the chemical-potential bound \$mu^{2}$/r_+^2 \le 8(d-1)/9, and the free-energy difference that decides the confinement–deconfinement transition. The second load-bearing mechanism is the effective mass m_{\rm eff}^2 = $m^{2}$ - $q^{2}$\$phi^{2}$/($r^{2}$ f), whose violation of the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound $m^{2}$ \ge -(d-1)^2/4 signals Cooper-pair condensation and translates into N_c < G(d,\tilde\mu). Near the critical point the scalar equation is recast as a Sturm-Liouville problem whose eigenvalue ratio is minimized over a trial function H(z); the existence of the N_c=2 phase in d=4 is reduced to finding an H(z) with H(0)=1, H'(0)=0 that keeps the ratio below 8/3.

What would settle it

Re-derive f(r) by solving the Einstein-Maxwell equations in the metric ansatz (5): the Maxwell equation gives \phi \sim \rho/$r^{{d-3}}$ and the charge term in f(r) should be \$rho^{2}$/$r^{{2(d-2)}}$, not the r_+^d/$r^{{d+2}}$ term of Eq. (9). With the corrected metric, recompute the Hawking temperature bound (11), the critical chemical potential of the confinement–deconfinement transition, and the Sturm-Liouville ratio (65); if in d=4 the allowed chemical potential exceeds the transition value, the paper's no-transition conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a dimension-generic holographic setup for color superconductivity that adds the confinement phase to the earlier no-confinement treatment. In the deconfinement phase (planar RN-AdS black hole), the BF-bound-breaking condition yields the family of bounds N_c < G(d, \tilde\mu) with \tilde\mu = 3\hat\mu/\sqrt{8(d-1)}, and the numerical survey shows that G exceeds 2 only for d=4, so only the four-dimensional bulk can accommodate the N_c=2 CSC phase. In d=4 the paper finds that the critical chemical potential for the confinement–deconfinement transition, \mu_{cd}^{(4)} = \sqrt{8/3}\,(3/2)^{1/3}, exceeds the maximum allowed chemical potential \sqrt{8/3}, and therefore no such transition occurs. For the confinement phase, the instability condition gives N_c < 4\mu/(d-3), and with the simplest trial function no CSC solution is found even for N_c=1, leaving existence contingent on a different trial function. The overall conclusion is that with standard Einstein-Maxwell gravity, only d=4 is a candidate for two-color superconductivity, and only in the non-confined/deconfined setting.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation rests on taking equation (9) to be the blackening function of the d-dimensional planar Reissner-Nordström-AdS black hole, even though the standard Einstein-Maxwell solution has a charge term that scales differently and matches (9) only for d=6.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the d=4 no-transition claim holds, the confined and deconfined regimes in this model are separated by no zero-temperature chemical-potential-driven Hawking-Page transition, so a confined gauge theory stays confined for all allowed chemical potentials.
  • If the d=4 N_c=2 bound is accepted, Einstein-Maxwell gravity with standard Maxwell action is a viable holographic arena for two-color color superconductivity only at d=4; all higher even dimensions are restricted to N_c=1.
  • For d=6, the model recovers the known CSC results of the original holographic QCD setup, including the confinement–deconfinement critical chemical potential \mu_{cd}=1.73.
  • In the confinement phase, the general bound N_c < 4\mu_{cd}(d)/(d-3) determines the maximum number of colors for which a Cooper pair condensate could exist, giving N_c^{\max}(4)=6 and N_c^{\max}(6)=2.
  • The Sturm-Liouville formulation gives a concrete numerical target: an admissible trial function lowering the eigenvalue ratio below 8/3 would establish the N_c=2 CSC phase in d=4 without modifying the gravity action.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the blackening function is replaced by the standard d-dimensional planar RN-AdS solution, whose charge term scales as \rho^2/r^{2(d-2)}, the chemical-potential bound and the free-energy comparison change, so the d=4 no-transition conclusion may not survive.
  • Beyond the paper: the N_c=2 existence question is framed as the existence of a trial function H(z) satisfying condition (66); a direct numerical optimization over a richer trial-function family would settle whether the Sturm-Liouville ratio can be driven below 8/3.
  • Beyond the paper: the same effective-mass criterion in the confinement phase gives a simple N_c < 4\mu/(d-3) bound that could be tested against other holographic superconductor models with a compact dimension.
  • Beyond the paper: because the d=4 boundary with the extra circle is still three-dimensional, the confinement-phase bound N_c^{\max}=6 avoids the usual two-dimensional obstruction to ordering, making the bound potentially physical for layered or compactified gauge theories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a holographic model for color superconductivity (CSC) in a general AdS_d bulk with a compactified boundary dimension, dual to a confining SU(N_c) gauge theory. It writes down an Einstein-Maxwell-scalar action, uses the planar Reissner-Nordström AdS black hole and the AdS soliton as the two phases, and aims to compute the free energies, the confinement-deconfinement critical chemical potential, and the N_c window for the s-wave CSC instability, with special emphasis on the d=4 case. The main conclusions are that only d=4 Einstein-Maxwell gravity can support N_c=2 CSC and that d=4 has no confinement-deconfinement phase transition.

Significance. If the results held, they would identify d=4 as a special case and constrain which gauge theories can exhibit holographic color superconductivity. The paper provides a Sturm-Liouville framework for the critical chemical potential and is candid about the limitations of its trial-function method. However, the quantitative claims rest on a blackening function that is not the general-d planar Reissner-Nordström-AdS solution, and the d=4 no-transition argument contains an internal comparison error. Since these are load-bearing for the paper's central statements, the significance of the work in its present form is substantially reduced.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (9)] The blackening function in Eq. (9) is not the planar RN-AdS solution for general d. Solving the Einstein-Maxwell equations with the gauge field (24) gives f(r) = 1 - (1 + (d-3)μ²/[2(d-2)r_+²])(r_+/r)^{d-1} + (d-3)μ²/[2(d-2)r_+²](r_+/r)^{2(d-2)}. Equation (9) instead uses a charge term proportional to r^{-(d+2)}, which coincides with r^{-2(d-2)} only when d=6. Consequently the Hawking temperature (10), the chemical-potential bound (11), the even-d free energies (30), and the d=4 Euclidean action (49) are all computed with the wrong metric. For d=4 the correct temperature is T=(1/4π)(3r_+ - μ²/(4r_+)), not Eq. (10)'s (1/4π)(3r_+ - 9μ²/(8r_+)). Since the paper's d=4 conclusions are derived from these expressions, they are unsupported.
  2. [Section III, after Eq. (50)] The comparison that leads to the claimed absence of a confinement-deconfinement transition for d=4 is invalid. Equation (11) bounds μ ≤ sqrt(8/3) r_+ for d=4, not μ ≤ sqrt(8/3) independent of r_+. The Hawking-Page condition Ω_BH = Ω_soliton with r_0=1 gives r_+=(3/2)^{1/3} when μ takes the bound value sqrt(8/3) r_+. Hence μ_cd(4)=sqrt(8/3)(3/2)^{1/3} is exactly the maximum allowed chemical potential at that r_+, not greater than the maximum. The paper's statement 'this critical chemical potential of the phase transition is greater than the maximum of the chemical potential in the case d=4' compares quantities at different values of r_+ and does not establish the absence of a phase transition.
  3. [Section III.A, Eq. (53) and Fig. 1] The key instability condition N_c < G(d, μ_tilde) and Fig. 1 are taken verbatim from Ref. [1] ('Image taken from [1]'), and the new Sturm-Liouville calculation in Eqs. (60)-(65) does not verify this bound. The paper's own trial-function analysis with H(z)=1-az² fails to find a critical μ for N_c=2, and the paper explicitly leaves open the possibility that another H(z) exists. Therefore the statement 'only with d=4 Einstein-Maxwell gravity can study the CSC phase with N_c=2' is not an independently derived result of this manuscript but a restatement of the author's prior numerical work.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] The notation V ol(Γ_{d-2}), X, and R_y is never introduced, making the free-energy formulas hard to interpret dimensionally.
  2. [Eqs. (27)-(28)] The free-energy expressions for even and odd d are quoted from Ref. [24], but their derivation and the role of the parameter t are not explained, so a reader cannot check the matching to the specific f(r) used in this paper.
  3. [Section IV] The phrase 'in the case d=4, this model does not have a phase transition of confinement and deconfinement' is repeated as a conclusion, but the preceding analysis compares μ_cd with the wrong bound; the statement should be revised once the correct RN-AdS metric is used.
  4. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical and grammatical errors (e.g., 'confinement$-$deconfinemnt', 'probing' for 'prove', 'obeservation', 'arvix', 'Sturm−Liuoville', 'It’s written in form') that should be corrected before any resubmission.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The central N_c=2/d=4 uniqueness claim is imported from the author's own prior paper [1], while the new free-energy and trial-function computations are largely independent (though Eq. (9) raises a separate correctness concern).

  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Section III.A, equations (51)-(55) and Fig.1]
    "In [1] we have proven that only with d = 4 we have the color superconductivity phase with N_c = 2 without the confinement phase by Einstein−Maxwell gravity. ... After some manipulation (detail in [1]) we obtain N_c < 4 sqrt(F_max(d, hat(mu), z))/(d-3) ... From Fig.1 we probe that only with the d = 4 Einstein-Maxwell gravity can study the CSC phase with N_c = 2. ... Image taken from [1]."

    The paper's central conclusion that N_c=2 CSC is possible only for d=4 is not derived from the equations in this paper; it is quoted from the author's previous paper [1], and the numerical figure supporting this conclusion is reproduced from [1]. The inequality N_c < G(d, mu-tilde) is therefore inherited as an input, so the load-bearing uniqueness claim reduces to a self-citation rather than to an independent proof in the present work. The paper does add new trial-function and free-energy analysis, which prevents the whole derivation from being circular, but this specific central claim is imported.

full rationale

Most of the paper's new computation -- the Euclidean action, free-energy comparison, Sturm-Liouville estimate with H(z)=1-az^2, and confinement-phase BF bounds -- is not circular: the trial function is not fitted to force the conclusion, and the paper explicitly leaves the N_c=2 existence question open ('The proof of whether the function H(z) exists or not is to be studied in the future'). The d=4 'no confinement-deconfinement transition' statement follows from a free-energy comparison, not from a hidden fit, so it is not circular (though its comparison of mu_cd with sqrt(8/3) at different r_+ values and the use of Eq. (9) are correctness risks, not circularity risks). The main circularity is the inherited uniqueness claim: the assertion that only d=4 Einstein-Maxwell gravity can accommodate N_c=2 is taken verbatim from [1], a same-author citation, and Fig.1 is itself 'Image taken from [1]'. Because that claim is load-bearing for the paper's stated purpose and is not independently established here, the score is 4 rather than 0-2. No parameter fitting is disguised as prediction, and no known result is merely renamed, so no higher score is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new particles or forces. It relies on a sequence of standard holographic identifications plus one suspect generalization, Eq. (9), which carries most of the risk. The variational trial function is a method choice, not a fitted constant, though its parameter a is tuned during the eigenvalue estimate.

free parameters (1)
  • a = minimized, not quoted
    The variational parameter in the trial function H(z)=1-a z^2. The Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue in Eq. (65) is minimized over a, and the existence of a critical chemical potential depends on this minimization.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper The planar RN-AdS blackening function has the form of Eq. (9) for all d.
    Load-bearing assumption. The charge term r_+^d/r^(d+2) matches the known solution only at d=6; for general d the correct exponent is 2(d-2).
  • domain assumption Confinement is dual to the AdS soliton with f(r)=1-(r_0/r)^(d-1) and constant gauge field phi=mu.
    Standard holographic QCD assumption (Natsuume [23]), invoked in Section II to describe the confined phase.
  • domain assumption The Cooper pair charge is q=2/N_c.
    Eq. (2), modeled on the baryon number of a diquark in QCD. For a general SU(N_c) gauge theory this is a postulate rather than a derived quantity.
  • standard math The instability condition for the bulk scalar is m_eff^2 < -(d-1)^2/4, with m_eff^2 = m^2 - q^2 phi^2/(r^2 f).
    Eqs. (51)-(52), following the BF bound analysis of [1],[17]. This is the standard criterion used to claim scalar hair formation.
  • ad hoc to paper The trial function H(z)=1-a z^2 is a sufficient estimator for the critical chemical potential.
    The authors use this simplest trial function and acknowledge that other functions could change the conclusion. The negative result for N_c=2 is therefore conditional on this ansatz.
  • ad hoc to paper Setting Delta_-=1 fixes m^2=2-d.
    Eq. (15) is a normalization choice that simplifies the near-boundary expansion. It is not forced by a uniqueness theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Remark on the Emergence of Color Superconductivity for Gauge Theories in General Spacetime Dimensions from simple Holographic Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V4X27Q4E

@misc{pith2026241217875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Remark on the Emergence of Color Superconductivity for Gauge Theories in General Spacetime Dimensions from simple Holographic Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V4X27Q4E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17875}
}
abstract

We generalize the concept of holography for the color superconductivity (CSC) phase by considering $d$-dimensional Anti de Sitter (AdS) space instead of the traditional 6 dimensions. The corresponding dual field theory is an arbitrary confining gauge theory with $SU(N_c)$ symmetry, like quantum chromodynamics (QCD) CSC. We then use a holographic model based on Einstein-Maxwell gravity in $d$-dimensional AdS spacetime to study this phenomenon in both confinement and deconfinement phase, study the confinement$-$deconfinement phase transition and the condition for the $N_c=2$ CSC phase with $d=4$ case, one special case from arXiv:2411.05550

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our numerical investigation for G(d, µ˜) in Eq. (54). This calculation was done using MatLab R2023a [25]. (A) The surface function G(d, µ˜) inside the region of interests i.e. (d, µ˜) ∈ (3, 11] × [0, 1]. (B) We zoom into the small corner where G(d, µ˜) > 2 can be realized. Image taken from [1]. the function H(z) is trial function and it satisfy the boundary condition H(0) = 1 and H′ (0) = 0. And because this solutio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Our numerical investigation for the eigenvalue estimation of the Sturm-Liouville equation. These calculations was done using MatLab R2023a [25], using the test function H(z) = 1−az2 . (A1) The case without confinement phase with Nc = 1, corresponding to Eq. (65). (A2) The case without confinement phase with Nc = 2, corresponding to Eq. (65). (B) Case full confinement phase with Nc = 1, corresponding to Eq. (78). Wit… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Holographic model for color superconductivity in d-dimension bulk without confinement phase

    Nguyen Hoang Vu. Holographic model for color superconductivity in d-dimension bulk without confinement phase. Physics of Atomic Nuclei , 87, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Holographic description of color superconductivity

    Kazem Bitaghsir Fadafan, Jesus Cruz Rojas, and Nick Evans. Holographic description of color superconductivity. Physical Review D, 98(6):066010, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Holographic quark matter with color superconductivity and a stiff equation of state for compact stars.Physical Review D, 103(2):026012, 2021

    Kazem Bitaghsir Fadafan, Jesús Cruz Rojas, and Nick Evans. Holographic quark matter with color superconductivity and a stiff equation of state for compact stars.Physical Review D, 103(2):026012, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Instability of holographic cold compact stars with a color superconducting core.Phys.Rev.D 107, 126007, 2023

    K.Ghoroku et.al. Instability of holographic cold compact stars with a color superconducting core.Phys.Rev.D 107, 126007, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Gw170817: Obeservation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Phys.Rev.Lett 119 161101, 2017

    B.P.Abbott et al. Gw170817: Obeservation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Phys.Rev.Lett 119 161101, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Observing hot holographic quark star with gravitational waves.arvix: 2501.17121 , 2025

    L.F.Chen et al. Observing hot holographic quark star with gravitational waves.arvix: 2501.17121 , 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity.International journal of theoretical physics, 38(4):1113–1133, 1999

    Juan Maldacena. The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity.International journal of theoretical physics, 38(4):1113–1133, 1999

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Anti de sitter space and holography.arXiv preprint hep-th/9802150 , 1998

    Edward Witten. Anti de sitter space and holography.arXiv preprint hep-th/9802150 , 1998

    arXiv 1998

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory

    Steven S Gubser, Igor R Klebanov, and Alexander M Polyakov. Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory. Physics Letters B , 428(1-2):105–114, 1998

    1998

  2. [10]

    A curious use of extra dimension in classical mechanics: Geometrization of potential

    Trung V Phan and Anh Doan. A curious use of extra dimension in classical mechanics: Geometrization of potential. J. Geom. Graphics, 25:265–270, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Towards a holographic model of color superconductivity.New Journal of Physics , 13(5):055001, 2011

    Pallab Basu, Fernando Nogueira, Moshe Rozali, Jared B Stang, and Mark Van Raamsdonk. Towards a holographic model of color superconductivity.New Journal of Physics , 13(5):055001, 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    Wilson loops in exact holographic rg flows at zero and finite temperatures

    Anastasia A Golubtsova and Vu H Nguyen. Wilson loops in exact holographic rg flows at zero and finite temperatures. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 202(2):214–230, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    where we studied the five-dimensional bulk and the four dimensions found in holographic models of metallic superconductivity [14, 15]. In the first study of the holographic model for the CSC phase [11], the authors considered Einstein-Maxwell gravity and the standard Maxwell i...

  6. [14]

    Orientation dependence of confinement-deconfinement phase transition in anisotropic media

    K.Rannu I.Aref’eva and P.Slepov. Orientation dependence of confinement-deconfinement phase transition in anisotropic media. Phys.Lett.B 792, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    Building a holographic superconductor.Physical Review Letters, 101(3):031601, 2008

    Sean A Hartnoll, Christopher P Herzog, and Gary T Horowitz. Building a holographic superconductor.Physical Review Letters, 101(3):031601, 2008

    2008

  8. [16]

    Holographic superconductors.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008(12):015, 2008

    Sean A Hartnoll, Christopher P Herzog, and Gary T Horowitz. Holographic superconductors.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008(12):015, 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    Holographic model with power-law maxwell field for color superconductivity

    Cao H Nam. Holographic model with power-law maxwell field for color superconductivity. Physical Review D , 106(12):126021, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Color superconductivity in a holographic model.Physical Review D, 99(10):106011, 2019

    Kazuo Ghoroku, Kouji Kashiwa, Yoshimasa Nakano, Motoi Tachibana, and Fumihiko Toyoda. Color superconductivity in a holographic model.Physical Review D, 99(10):106011, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Stability in gauged extended supergravity.Annals of physics, 144(2):249– 281, 1982

    Peter Breitenlohner and Daniel Z Freedman. Stability in gauged extended supergravity.Annals of physics, 144(2):249– 281, 1982

    1982

  12. [20]

    Positive energy in anti-de sitter backgrounds and gauged extended supergravity

    Peter Breitenlohner and Daniel Z Freedman. Positive energy in anti-de sitter backgrounds and gauged extended supergravity. Physics Letters B , 115(3):197–201, 1982

    1982

  13. [21]

    More realistic holographic model of color superconductivity with higher derivative corrections.Physical Review D, 104(4):046006, 2021

    Cao H Nam. More realistic holographic model of color superconductivity with higher derivative corrections.Physical Review D, 104(4):046006, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Holographic superconductivity in the large d expansion

    Roberto Emparan and Kentaro Tanabe. Holographic superconductivity in the large d expansion. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(1):1–22, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Gauss–bonnet holographic superconductors in exponential nonlinear electrodynamics.General Relativity and Gravitation, 51:1–26, 2019

    Cao H Nam. Gauss–bonnet holographic superconductors in exponential nonlinear electrodynamics.General Relativity and Gravitation, 51:1–26, 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    AdS/CFT duality user guide , volume 903

    Makoto Natsuume. AdS/CFT duality user guide , volume 903. Springer, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    Quantum statistical relation for black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to einstein- gauss-bonnet ads gravity.Phys.Rev.D 83 064017 , 2011

    O.Miskovic and R.Olea. Quantum statistical relation for black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to einstein- gauss-bonnet ads gravity.Phys.Rev.D 83 064017 , 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Matlab version: 9.14.0.2239454 (r2023a), 2023

    The MathWorks Inc. Matlab version: 9.14.0.2239454 (r2023a), 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Analystic calculation of properties of holographic superconductors

    G.Siopsis and J.Therrien. Analystic calculation of properties of holographic superconductors. JHEP)05(2010)013, 2010

    2010

  20. [28]

    Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one dimensional and two dimensional isotropic heisenberg models

    H.Wagner N.D.Mermin. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one dimensional and two dimensional isotropic heisenberg models. Physical Review Letters, 17:1133, 1966

    1966

  21. [29]

    There are no goldstone boson in two dimension.Commun.Math.Phys, 31:259, 1973

    S.R.Coleman. There are no goldstone boson in two dimension.Commun.Math.Phys, 31:259, 1973

    1973

  22. [30]

    S.Gubser and S. Pufu. The gravity dual of a p-wave superconductor.JHEP11(2008)033, 2008

    2008

  23. [31]

    Holographic d-wave superconductor.JHEP)08(2013)112, 2013

    K.Kim and M.Taylor. Holographic d-wave superconductor.JHEP)08(2013)112, 2013

    2013

  24. [32]

    Design and characterization of electrons in a fractal geometry.Nature physics, 15(2):127– 131, 2019

    Sander N Kempkes, Marlou R Slot, Saoirsé E Freeney, Stephan JM Zevenhuizen, Daniel Vanmaekelbergh, Ingmar Swart, and C Morais Smith. Design and characterization of electrons in a fractal geometry.Nature physics, 15(2):127– 131, 2019. 16

    2019

  25. [33]

    The fractal geometry of nature/revised and enlarged edition.New York, 1983

    Benoit B Mandelbrot. The fractal geometry of nature/revised and enlarged edition.New York, 1983

    1983

  26. [34]

    Vanishing in fractal space: Thermal melting and hydrodynamic collapse

    Trung V Phan, Truong H Cai, and Van H Do. Vanishing in fractal space: Thermal melting and hydrodynamic collapse. Physics of Fluids , 36(3), 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Bacterial route finding and collective escape in mazes and fractals.Physical Review X , 10(3):031017, 2020

    Trung V Phan, Ryan Morris, Matthew E Black, Tuan K Do, Ke-Chih Lin, Krisztina Nagy, James C Sturm, Julia Bos, and Robert H Austin. Bacterial route finding and collective escape in mazes and fractals.Physical Review X , 10(3):031017, 2020

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.