Two-loop MHV Form Factors from the Periodic Wilson Loop

Zhenjie Li

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Two-loop MHV Form Factors from the Periodic Wilson Loop

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the periodicity of a Wilson loop explains the non-planar square roots in two-loop MHV form factors and supplies the complete two-loop integrand.

desk verdict A serious two-loop test of the periodic Wilson loop duality with new form-factor symbols; the projection rule needs a precise statement but the paper deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17974 v2 pith:RLWO5GCN submitted 2024-12-23 hep-th

Zhenjie Li This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th MSC 81T1381T1881T60 PACS 11.15.-q11.15.Bt11.30.Pb

keywords periodicWilsonloopMHVformfactorN=4superYang-Millstwo-loopsquarerootspathorderingremainderfunctionsymbol

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the duality between planar MHV form factors in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory and periodic light-like polygon Wilson loops survives at two loops, provided the periodicity is treated as a physical compact direction rather than a bookkeeping device. The compactification makes the gluon propagator an infinite sum over periodic images, and after summing, only diagrams that fit inside one period are kept; this projection is what restores gauge invariance at one loop. The same projection forces path ordering between points on different edges of the same period, and the paper argues that this ordering is the Wilson-loop origin of the square roots that appear in non-planar Feynman diagrams with four massless and one massive leg. Including the resulting XC diagrams, the paper assembles the n-particle two-loop integrand, proves the cancellation of all divergences, reproduces the known four-particle remainder function, and evaluates the 5-particle and 6-particle remainder functions as new data. A sympathetic reader would care because it turns a formal strong-coupling duality into a working weak-coupling computational scheme and provides the first higher-multiplicity two-loop form factor symbols.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the periodic light-like polygon Wilson loop, whose $q$-direction is compact after T-duality, so the coordinate-space propagator becomes the infinite image sum $D_{\mu\nu}(x)=\sum_n D_{\mu\nu}(x+nq)$. This sum makes the one-loop gauge variation vanish and, at two loops, generates the path ordering between points on different edges in the same period; the resulting XC diagram is the mechanism that produces the non-planar square roots. Divergences are isolated by two ancillary diagrams $M^\pm$ built from the one-loop three-mass triangle, and the non-abelian exponentiation theorem selects the $C_F C_A$ color topologies that survive in the logarithm of the Wilson loop.

What would settle it

Evaluate the integrand (5.5) at $n=7$ and compare the resulting symbol with an independent two-loop Feynman-integral calculation: if the 7-particle remainder function does not reduce to the 6-particle one in the collinear limit, or if any letter disagrees, the periodic-sum-and-project rule is wrong. The conjectured 2D alphabet in eq (5.8) at $n=8$ is a second decisive check.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the n-particle two-loop MHV form factor is computed by the periodic Wilson loop through a two-step rule: first sum every two-loop gluon diagram over all periodic images, then project out any contribution that cannot be placed inside one period. The projection is not cosmetic; without it the one-loop expansion is gauge dependent, and with it a new class of diagrams appears in which two points on different edges of the same periodic image are path-ordered. These XC diagrams carry exactly the square roots of the four-massless-one-massive non-planar Feynman integrals, so the paper identifies the Wilson-loop origin of those roots. Assembling all contributing topologies (square, curtain, star, Y, X, and XC) and regularizing cusps by a small mass, the author obtains the integrand (5.5), proves that its divergent parts cancel, verifies that at n=4 it reproduces the known two-loop remainder function, and supplies the symbols of the 5-particle and 6-particle remainder functions, which pass collinear limits to the 4-particle form factor and to MHV amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the direction connecting one period to the next is genuinely compact, so that every quantity is a sum over repeated copies of the same picture and only one copy is physical; if that compactification is not the correct way to realize the periodic Wilson loop at weak coupling, the projection step, the cross-edge ordering diagrams, and the square-root explanation do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The rule 'sum over periodic images, then project to one period' now has a two-loop proof of principle, so the same rule can be tried at three loops, where new XC-type images will appear.
The paper's counting gives exactly $n(n-3)/2$ one-loop-triangle square roots and $n(n-3)/2$ two-loop XC square roots at $n$ points, predicting the number and type of algebraic letters for any multiplicity.
The last-entry condition found for the two-loop form factors matches the MHV-amplitude condition: only $\langle i-1,i,i+1,j\rangle$ can appear in the last entry of the parity-even part.
In the 2D limit the 6-particle symbol has 21 letters, and the paper conjectures the 2D alphabet for all even multiplicities, with the alternating-sign letters appearing only in the third slot.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference: if the periodic-sum-and-project rule is general, the same mechanism should generate non-planar square roots in form factors of other half-BPS operators, where the periodic super Wilson loop replaces the bosonic one.
Inference: the antipodal structure the paper spots in the XC diagram's symbol hints that the periodic Wilson loop may be the natural place to prove antipodal duality beyond symbol level, though the paper only observes the structure at two loops.
Inference: a decisive test the paper does not perform is $n=7$: its integrand (5.5) should yield a symbol that reduces to the 6-particle one in collinear limits and matches an independent Feynman-integral computation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is the first real two-loop test of the periodic Wilson loop duality, and it produces new 5- and 6-particle form-factor symbols. Read it if you care about form factors, Wilson loops, or the square-root alphabet.

What is actually new: the observation that periodicity forces path ordering between points on different edges, and that this is exactly what generates the non-planar square roots; the n-particle two-loop integrand (5.5); the computation of the two-loop remainder functions for 5 and 6 particles; and the last-entry condition and 2D alphabet conjectures. The paper also passes the checks you want: it recovers the known 4-particle result, and collinear limits match known form-factor/amplitude results. Ancillary files contain the symbols and regulated diagrams, so the work is reproducible in principle.

Soft spots: the paper is upfront that at two loops it uses the old-fashioned expansion and only 'remembers' the projection to one period (Section 2.2). That projection is the load-bearing step, and the stress-test's worry is legitimate: if a different but equally natural projection convention is chosen, the coefficient of the XC diagram, and hence the square-root letters, could change. That said, the 4-particle recovery and collinear limits are nontrivial and constrain the combinatorics; they don't fully pin it down for all n, but this feels like a request for a precise statement rather than a fatal flaw. The bigger practical issue is that many integrations are left in ancillary files with 'straightforward' signposts; a referee will need to spot-check some integrals and may want an appendix outlining the method for one representative diagram. The gauge-invariance argument is clearly presented, though it relies on the infinite sum rather than the projected integrand; the divergence cancellation is shown via cancellation of the M± pieces, which is fine.

Bottom line: this paper deserves serious referee time. The method is important, the data is new, the checks are real. I'd recommend accepting with a request to make the projection rule precise for all n and to show more detail on at least one non-trivial integration. For a reading group, the XC square-root story alone is worth the session.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the weak-coupling expansion of the periodic light-like Wilson loop proposed to be dual to MHV form factors in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills theory. It argues that the periodicity of the contour forces path ordering between points that lie on different edges but in the same periodic image, and it identifies the resulting diagrams with the non-planar square-root contributions that appear in two-loop form factors. The paper gives an n-particle two-loop integrand for the remainder function in eq. (5.5), proves the cancellation of infrared divergences by summing the divergent parts, recovers the known four-particle result, and presents symbols for the two-loop five- and six-particle form factors together with collinear and 2D-limit checks. It also proposes a last-entry condition and a conjecture for the 2D alphabet.

Significance. If the construction is correct, this is a substantial advance: it moves the form-factor/Wilson-loop duality beyond one loop, provides the first two-loop five- and six-particle form-factor results, and gives a structural explanation of the appearance of two-loop square roots. The paper is commendably concrete in several respects: there are no fitted parameters, the integrand is benchmarked against the known four-particle remainder function, the divergence cancellation is shown explicitly in eq. (5.4), and machine-readable ancillary files are supplied for the symbols and diagram results. The main risk is that the one-period projection rule is not derived at two loops, and the central integrations are largely delegated to ancillary files, so the new results cannot be fully verified from the text alone.

major comments (3)

[Section 2.2 and Section 5.1, eq. (5.5)] The derivation of the n-particle integrand depends on the rule 'take the infinite periodic sum and then project to diagrams that can be contained in one period.' At one loop this rule is justified via the Lagrangian insertion formula, but at two loops the paper explicitly uses the old-fashioned expansion and only 'remembers' the projection. This projection is load-bearing: it selects the XC diagram with the ordering z4 < z1+q, fixes the overcounting subtraction P' in eq. (5.1), and thereby determines the two-loop square-root letters and all relative coefficients in eq. (5.5). The gauge-invariance argument in Section 2.2 applies to the infinite unprojected sum, not to the projected finite integrand. A different but equally natural projection convention would change the coefficients in eq. (5.5). I request a derivation of the two-loop projection from the Lagrangian insertion formula or an equivalent first-principles argument, together with a check that the projected integrand is gauge invariant.
[Section 4 and Section 5.2] The central new results, R_5 and R_6, are obtained by integrating the star, curtain, X and XC diagrams, but the paper states only that the integrations are 'straightforward' or 'tedious but straightforward' and places the results in ancillary files. The text does not give the integrated expressions, nor does it spell out how the O(1) regularization-dependent parts cancel beyond the M± divergence sum in eq. (5.4). As a result, the new symbols cannot be verified from the paper alone. I ask the authors to include the integrated results at least for representative configurations, or to provide a reproducible derivation, and to state explicitly which parts of the finite remainder are checked to be independent of the cutoff regularization.
[Section 5.1, eq. (5.1)] The removal of overcounting encoded in P' is defined only through an example for n=5, where 12 tuples survive instead of 14. For general n there is no prescription for which periodic images of the double product IO(1,k)IO(j,l) are identified with each other, and the cyclic summation notation for that term is ambiguous. Because these product terms contribute to the finite symbol, a general and unambiguous definition of the surviving tuples is needed before eq. (5.5) can be used for arbitrary n.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2.2, after eq. (2.5)] The condition on the discrete momentum is written as 'exp(ik·q) = 0 or k·q = 2πn'; the first expression should be 'exp(ik·q) = 1'.
[Section 5.1, eq. (5.1)] The notation '(···)' for the divergence subtraction and the symbol 'cyclic' are not defined explicitly. Please spell out the range of cyclic images and the precise content of the subtracted term.
[Section 4.3] The statement that a star diagram has eight one-loop triangle square roots, with seven algebraic letters per square root, is not demonstrated in the text. A short derivation or an explicit example would help the reader understand the counting.
[Introduction and Section 5.2] There are several typos and grammatical slips: 'at weaking coulping' should be 'at weak coupling', and the sentence in the Introduction 'It is first argued from the string picture [18] that should be dual to...' is missing a subject.
[Appendix B] The OPE variables for n>6 are not defined, although the 2D conjecture in eq. (5.8) refers to general n. A short comment on how the parametrization generalizes would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the two-loop integrand is constructed from the periodic-sum propagator and checked against independent known limits; self-citations are only technical.

full rationale

The central claim, that eq. (5.5) gives the two-loop n-particle MHV form-factor integrand from the periodic Wilson loop, is not obtained by fitting the target. The construction assumes the T-duality compactification of the q direction, which determines the propagator as the infinite image sum in eq. (2.5); the path-ordering effect in eq. (2.8) and the XC integral in eq. (2.9) are computed from that periodic sum rather than imposed to match the known four-particle square root. The n=4 recovery is reported as a check ("We checked that this integrand at n=4 gives the known two-loop 4-particle remainder function!"), and the 5- and 6-particle symbols are new results subsequently tested against collinear limits involving known form factors and MHV amplitudes. No parameter in eq. (5.5) is fitted to the two-loop output: the signs follow from the color factors in eq. (3.6), the 1/2 in the XC/IC2 combination is an overcounting-average convention, and the P' projection is a combinatorial counting rule illustrated by examples. The main caveat is that the two-loop implementation of the one-period projection is asserted rather than derived from the Lagrangian-insertion formula ("we should remember that we need to first take the infinite periodic sum and then project diagrams that cannot be contained in one period", Section 2.2). This is an unproven assumption and therefore a correctness risk, but it is not circular: the projection rule is not defined in terms of, and does not presuppose, the square-root letters it is used to explain. The paper's self-citations [45,46] supply a published d log integration technique for star diagrams; that technique is not the target result and does not carry the central claim. Under the quoted-equation standard, no specific circular reduction can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of established dualities and a new projection rule. No free parameters are fitted, and no new particles, forces, or dimensions are invented. The periodic Lagrangian insertions are taken from the cited literature.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Amplitude/Wilson loop duality: planar MHV amplitudes equal light-like polygon Wilson loops at weak and strong coupling (refs [1-14]).
Used to import known two-loop closed-polygon diagram results and subtraction schemes.
domain assumption Form factor/periodic Wilson loop duality holds beyond one loop, conjectured from the string picture and previously checked at tree and one-loop level.
The computation assumes the duality that it tests. This is a benchmark check rather than a first-principles derivation of the duality.
domain assumption After T-duality the q-direction is compact, so the propagator is D_xi(x) = sum_n D_xi(x+nq) with k.q = 2*pi*n (Section 2.2, eq (2.5)).
Motivated by the string picture but not derived from the Wilson loop path integral. It underlies the gauge-invariance and path-ordering arguments.
ad hoc to paper The correct weak-coupling expansion is obtained by taking the infinite periodic sum and then projecting to diagrams contained in one period.
This is the central selection rule for diagrams. It is justified via the Lagrangian insertion formula but not proven in full detail.
domain assumption The cutoff regularization with a small mass eta at cusps reproduces the dimensional-regularization symbol after cancellation.
The divergent parts are shown to match, but the scheme-independence of the O(1) parts is asserted and only argued through eventual cancellation.
standard math Known BDS ansatz for form factors with f(2) and C(2) values (Section 3, ref [42]).
Used to define the remainder function and to subtract infrared divergences.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-loop MHV Form Factors from the Periodic Wilson Loop." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RLWO5GCN

@misc{pith2026241217974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-loop MHV Form Factors from the Periodic Wilson Loop},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RLWO5GCN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17974}
}

abstract

We discuss how to compute maximal-helicity-violating (MHV) form factors for the chiral part of the stress-tensor supermultiplet from periodic light-like polygon Wilson loops in planar $\mathcal N=4$ super Yang-Mills theory beyond the one-loop level. We show that the periodicity imposes path ordering on points on different edges, which explains the appearance of square roots coming from non-planar Feynman diagrams. Taking such diagrams into account, we provide the integrand of the two-loop $n$-particle MHV form factor, compute all diagrams, prove the cancellation of divergences and finally compute the two-loop 5-particle and 6-particle form factors as examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Double spacelike collinear limits from multi-Regge kinematics
hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The double spacelike collinear limit of planar N=4 SYM is governed by a generalized splitting amplitude that equals the six-point BDS-subtracted amplitude in multi-Regge kinematics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,

L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, “Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,” JHEP 06 (2007) 064, arXiv:0705.0303 [hep-th]

arXiv 2007
[2]

Comments on gluon scattering amplitudes via AdS/CFT,

L. F. Alday and J. Maldacena, “Comments on gluon scattering amplitudes via AdS/CFT,” JHEP 11 (2007) 068, arXiv:0710.1060 [hep-th]

arXiv 2007
[3]

On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality,

J. Drummond, J. Henn, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality,” Nucl. Phys. B795 (2008) 52–68, arXiv:0709.2368 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008
[4]

Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops,

J. Drummond, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops,” Nucl. Phys. B795 (2008) 385–408, arXiv:0707.0243 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008
[5]

Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,” Nucl. Phys. B 826 (2010) 337–364, arXiv:0712.1223 [hep-th]

arXiv 2010
[6]

MHV amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills and Wilson loops,

A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop, and G. Travaglini, “MHV amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills and Wilson loops,” Nucl. Phys. B794 (2008) 231–243, arXiv:0707.1153 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008
[7]

Hexagon Wilson loop = six-gluon MHV amplitude,

J. Drummond, J. Henn, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Hexagon Wilson loop = six-gluon MHV amplitude,” Nucl. Phys. B815 (2009) 142–173, arXiv:0803.1466 [hep-th]. – 30 –

arXiv 2009
[8]

The Two-Loop Six-Gluon MHV Amplitude in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

Z. Bern, L. Dixon, D. Kosower, R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, “The Two-Loop Six-Gluon MHV Amplitude in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 045007, arXiv:0803.1465 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008

Show all 55 references

[9]

An Analytic Result for the Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,

V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, and V. A. Smirnov, “An Analytic Result for the Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP 03 (2010) 099, arXiv:0911.5332 [hep-ph]

2010 arXiv
[10]

The Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,

V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, and V. A. Smirnov, “The Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP 05 (2010) 084, arXiv:1003.1702 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[11]

A Two-Loop Octagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,

V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, and V. A. Smirnov, “A Two-Loop Octagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP 09 (2010) 015, arXiv:1006.4127 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[12]

Notes on the scattering amplitude / Wilson loop duality,

S. Caron-Huot, “Notes on the scattering amplitude / Wilson loop duality,” JHEP 07 (2011) 058, arXiv:1010.1167 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[13]

An Operator Product Expansion for Polygonal null Wilson Loops,

L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, A. Sever, and P. Vieira, “An Operator Product Expansion for Polygonal null Wilson Loops,” JHEP 04 (2011) 088, arXiv:1006.2788 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[14]

The Complete Planar S-matrix of N=4 SYM as a Wilson Loop in Twistor Space,

L. Mason and D. Skinner, “The Complete Planar S-matrix of N=4 SYM as a Wilson Loop in Twistor Space,” JHEP 12 (2010) 018, arXiv:1009.2225 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[15]

Two-Loop Polygon Wilson Loops in N=4 SYM,

C. Anastasiou, A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop, V. V. Khoze, B. Spence, and G. Travaglini, “Two-Loop Polygon Wilson Loops in N=4 SYM,” JHEP 05 (2009) 115, arXiv:0902.2245 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[16]

Superconformal symmetry and two-loop amplitudes in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills,

S. Caron-Huot, “Superconformal symmetry and two-loop amplitudes in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 12 (2011) 066, arXiv:1105.5606 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[17]

The symbol and alphabet of two-loop NMHV amplitudes from ¯Q equations,

S. He, Z. Li, and C. Zhang, “The symbol and alphabet of two-loop NMHV amplitudes from ¯Q equations,” arXiv:2009.11471 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[18]

Form factors at strong coupling via a Y-system,

J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, “Form factors at strong coupling via a Y-system,” JHEP 11 (2010) 104, arXiv:1009.1139 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[19]

Y-system for form factors at strong coupling in AdS5 and with multi-operator insertions in AdS3,

Z. Gao and G. Yang, “Y-system for form factors at strong coupling in AdS5 and with multi-operator insertions in AdS3,” JHEP 06 (2013) 105, arXiv:1303.2668 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[20]

Operator Product Expansion for Form Factors,

A. Sever, A. G. Tumanov, and M. Wilhelm, “Operator Product Expansion for Form Factors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126 no. 3, (2021) 031602, arXiv:2009.11297 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[21]

An Operator Product Expansion for Form Factors II. Born level,

A. Sever, A. G. Tumanov, and M. Wilhelm, “An Operator Product Expansion for Form Factors II. Born level,” JHEP 10 (2021) 071, arXiv:2105.13367 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[22]

An Operator Product Expansion for Form Factors III. Finite Coupling and Multi-Particle Contributions,

A. Sever, A. G. Tumanov, and M. Wilhelm, “An Operator Product Expansion for Form Factors III. Finite Coupling and Multi-Particle Contributions,” JHEP 03 (2022) 128, arXiv:2112.10569 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[23]

Form Factors in N=4 Super Yang-Mills and Periodic Wilson Loops,

A. Brandhuber, B. Spence, G. Travaglini, and G. Yang, “Form Factors in N=4 Super Yang-Mills and Periodic Wilson Loops,” JHEP 01 (2011) 134, arXiv:1011.1899 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[24]

Wilson loop duality and OPE for super form factors of half-BPS operators,

B. Basso and A. G. Tumanov, “Wilson loop duality and OPE for super form factors of half-BPS operators,” JHEP 02 (2024) 022, arXiv:2308.08432 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[25]

From correlation functions to Wilson loops,

L. F. Alday, B. Eden, . G. P. Korchemsky, J. Maldacena, and E. Sokatchev, “From correlation functions to Wilson loops,” JHEP 09 (2011) 123, arXiv:1007.3243 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[26]

Correlation function of null polygonal Wilson loops with local operators,

L. F. Alday, E. I. Buchbinder, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Correlation function of null polygonal Wilson loops with local operators,” JHEP 09 (2011) 034, arXiv:1107.5702 [hep-th]. – 31 –

2011 arXiv
[27]

More on the duality correlators/amplitudes,

B. Eden, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “More on the duality correlators/amplitudes,” Phys. Lett. B709 (2012) 247–253, arXiv:1009.2488 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[28]

A Proof of the Supersymmetric Correlation Function / Wilson Loop Correspondence,

T. Adamo, M. Bullimore, L. Mason, and D. Skinner, “A Proof of the Supersymmetric Correlation Function / Wilson Loop Correspondence,” JHEP 08 (2011) 076, arXiv:1103.4119 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[29]

All tree-level MHV form factors in N = 4 SYM from twistor space,

L. Koster, V. Mitev, M. Staudacher, and M. Wilhelm, “All tree-level MHV form factors in N = 4 SYM from twistor space,” JHEP 06 (2016) 162, arXiv:1604.00012 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[30]

On Form Factors and Correlation Functions in Twistor Space,

L. Koster, V. Mitev, M. Staudacher, and M. Wilhelm, “On Form Factors and Correlation Functions in Twistor Space,” JHEP 03 (2017) 131, arXiv:1611.08599 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[31]

Harmony of Super Form Factors,

A. Brandhuber, O. Gurdogan, R. Mooney, G. Travaglini, and G. Yang, “Harmony of Super Form Factors,” JHEP 10 (2011) 046, arXiv:1107.5067 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[32]

Bootstrapping a stress-tensor form factor through eight loops,

L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, “Bootstrapping a stress-tensor form factor through eight loops,” JHEP 07 (2022) 153, arXiv:2204.11901 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[33]

Antipodal Self-Duality for a Four-Particle Form Factor,

L. J. Dixon, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, Y.-T. Liu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, “Antipodal Self-Duality for a Four-Particle Form Factor,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130 no. 11, (2023) 111601, arXiv:2212.02410 [hep-th]

2023 arXiv
[34]

A Two-Loop Four-Point Form Factor at Function Level,

L. J. Dixon and S. Xin, “A Two-Loop Four-Point Form Factor at Function Level,” arXiv:2411.01571 [hep-th]
[35]

Analytic two-Loop four-point form factor of the stress-tensor supermultiplet in N = 4 SYM,

Y. Guo, L. Wang, G. Yang, and Y. Yin, “Analytic two-Loop four-point form factor of the stress-tensor supermultiplet in N = 4 SYM,” arXiv:2409.12445 [hep-th]

arXiv
[36]

Folding Amplitudes into Form Factors: An Antipodal Duality,

L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, “Folding Amplitudes into Form Factors: An Antipodal Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128 no. 11, (2022) 111602, arXiv:2112.06243 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[37]

All Two-Loop Feynman Integrals for Five-Point One-Mass Scattering,

S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, H. Ita, B. Page, V. Sotnikov, W. Tschernow, and S. Zoia, “All Two-Loop Feynman Integrals for Five-Point One-Mass Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132 no. 14, (2024) 141601, arXiv:2306.15431 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[38]

All-Multiplicity Nonplanar Amplitude Integrands in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory at Two Loops,

J. L. Bourjaily, E. Herrmann, C. Langer, A. J. McLeod, and J. Trnka, “All-Multiplicity Nonplanar Amplitude Integrands in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory at Two Loops,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124 no. 11, (2020) 111603, arXiv:1911.09106 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[39]

Quark scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,

J. McGreevy and A. Sever, “Quark scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,” JHEP 02 (2008) 015, arXiv:0710.0393 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[40]

Scattering amplitudes — Wilson loops duality for the first non-planar correction,

R. Ben-Israel, A. G. Tumanov, and A. Sever, “Scattering amplitudes — Wilson loops duality for the first non-planar correction,” JHEP 08 (2018) 122, arXiv:1802.09395 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[41]

Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, and J. Trnka, “Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,” JHEP 06 (2012) 125, arXiv:1012.6032 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[42]

Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond,

Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and V. A. Smirnov, “Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond,” Phys. Rev.D72 (2005) 085001, arXiv:hep-th/0505205 [hep-th]

2005 arXiv
[43]

Exponentiation of Eikonal Cross-sections in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

J. G. M. Gatheral, “Exponentiation of Eikonal Cross-sections in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Lett. B133 (1983) 90–94

1983
[44]

NONABELIAN EIKONAL EXPONENTIATION,

J. Frenkel and J. C. Taylor, “NONABELIAN EIKONAL EXPONENTIATION,” Nucl. Phys. B 246 (1984) 231–245. – 32 –

1984
[45]

Feynman Integrals and Scattering Amplitudes from Wilson Loops,

S. He, Z. Li, Q. Yang, and C. Zhang, “Feynman Integrals and Scattering Amplitudes from Wilson Loops,” arXiv:2012.15042 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[46]

The Wilson-loop d log representation for Feynman integrals,

S. He, Z. Li, Y. Tang, and Q. Yang, “The Wilson-loop d log representation for Feynman integrals,” JHEP 05 (2021) 052, arXiv:2012.13094 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[47]

A Surprise in the Amplitude/Wilson Loop Duality,

A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop, P. Katsaroumpas, D. Nguyen, B. Spence, M. Spradlin, and G. Travaglini, “A Surprise in the Amplitude/Wilson Loop Duality,” JHEP 07 (2010) 080, arXiv:1004.2855 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[48]

The hexagon Wilson loop and the BDS ansatz for the six-gluon amplitude,

J. Drummond, J. Henn, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “The hexagon Wilson loop and the BDS ansatz for the six-gluon amplitude,” Phys. Lett. B662 (2008) 456–460, arXiv:0712.4138 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[49]

Jumpstarting the All-Loop S-Matrix of Planar N=4 Super Yang-Mills,

S. Caron-Huot and S. He, “Jumpstarting the All-Loop S-Matrix of Planar N=4 Super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 07 (2012) 174, arXiv:1112.1060 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[50]

Null polygonal Wilson loops and minimal surfaces in Anti-de-Sitter space,

L. F. Alday and J. Maldacena, “Null polygonal Wilson loops and minimal surfaces in Anti-de-Sitter space,” JHEP 11 (2009) 082, arXiv:0904.0663 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[51]

Three-loop octagons and n-gons in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,

S. Caron-Huot and S. He, “Three-loop octagons and n-gons in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP 08 (2013) 101, arXiv:1305.2781 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[52]

Grassmannians for scattering amplitudes in 4d N = 4 SYM and 3d ABJM,

H. Elvang, Y.-t. Huang, C. Keeler, T. Lam, T. M. Olson, S. B. Roland, and D. E. Speyer, “Grassmannians for scattering amplitudes in 4d N = 4 SYM and 3d ABJM,” JHEP 12 (2014) 181, arXiv:1410.0621 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[53]

The Three-Point Form Factor of Tr ϕ3 to Six Loops,

B. Basso, L. J. Dixon, and A. G. Tumanov, “The Three-Point Form Factor of Tr ϕ3 to Six Loops,” arXiv:2410.22402 [hep-th]

arXiv
[54]

Bootstrapping a Two-Loop Four-Point Form Factor,

Y. Guo, L. Wang, and G. Yang, “Bootstrapping a Two-Loop Four-Point Form Factor,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127 no. 15, (2021) 151602, arXiv:2106.01374 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[55]

Analytic evaluation of the three-loop three-point form factor of tr ϕ3 in N = 4 sYM,

J. M. Henn, J. Lim, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, “Analytic evaluation of the three-loop three-point form factor of tr ϕ3 in N = 4 sYM,” arXiv:2410.22465 [hep-th]. – 33 –

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,

L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, “Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,” JHEP 06 (2007) 064, arXiv:0705.0303 [hep-th]

arXiv 2007

[2] [2]

Comments on gluon scattering amplitudes via AdS/CFT,

L. F. Alday and J. Maldacena, “Comments on gluon scattering amplitudes via AdS/CFT,” JHEP 11 (2007) 068, arXiv:0710.1060 [hep-th]

arXiv 2007

[3] [3]

On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality,

J. Drummond, J. Henn, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality,” Nucl. Phys. B795 (2008) 52–68, arXiv:0709.2368 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008

[4] [4]

Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops,

J. Drummond, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops,” Nucl. Phys. B795 (2008) 385–408, arXiv:0707.0243 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008

[5] [5]

Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,” Nucl. Phys. B 826 (2010) 337–364, arXiv:0712.1223 [hep-th]

arXiv 2010

[6] [6]

MHV amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills and Wilson loops,

A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop, and G. Travaglini, “MHV amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills and Wilson loops,” Nucl. Phys. B794 (2008) 231–243, arXiv:0707.1153 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008

[7] [7]

Hexagon Wilson loop = six-gluon MHV amplitude,

J. Drummond, J. Henn, G. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Hexagon Wilson loop = six-gluon MHV amplitude,” Nucl. Phys. B815 (2009) 142–173, arXiv:0803.1466 [hep-th]. – 30 –

arXiv 2009

[8] [8]

The Two-Loop Six-Gluon MHV Amplitude in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

Z. Bern, L. Dixon, D. Kosower, R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, “The Two-Loop Six-Gluon MHV Amplitude in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 045007, arXiv:0803.1465 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008