Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Search for a neutral gauge boson with nonuniversal fermion couplings in vector boson fusion processes in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read First VBF search for a nonuniversal Z' boson finds no signal and excludes masses up to 2.45 TeV in the ditau channel.

desk verdict First VBF Z' search, solid limits; fix the 'first limits' overclaim and add the LO scale caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19261 v2 pith:VLMTJKUD submitted 2024-12-26 hep-ex

CMS Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords Z'bosonvectorfusionnonuniversalcouplingstauleptonpairsWCMSLHCRun2exclusionlimits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that no heavy neutral spin-1 gauge boson, produced through vector boson fusion and decaying to tau-lepton pairs or W-boson pairs, is present in 138 $fb^{-1}$ of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions recorded by CMS. It is the first search for a Z' boson with nonuniversal fermion couplings using the VBF production mode. The observed mass spectra are consistent with standard model predictions, and the analysis sets upper limits on the product of production cross section and branching fraction. For a 50% branching fraction, Z' bosons decaying to tau pairs are excluded for masses up to 2.45 TeV, and those decaying to W pairs up to 1.60 TeV, depending on the coupling to standard model weak bosons.

What carries the argument

The search relies on the VBF tag: two energetic jets with dijet mass above 500 GeV, pseudorapidity separation above 4.2, and opposite detector hemispheres, which suppresses backgrounds by factors of $10^2$ to $10^4$. The discriminating observable is $m(\ell_1,\ell_2,p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$, approximating the Z' mass. Backgrounds are estimated with data-driven control-region methods: antiISO $\tau_h$ misidentification ratios and VBF selection efficiencies for the $\tau_h$ channels, and a four-region ABCD method in the $e\mu$ channel, all validated with closure tests.

What would settle it

A measurement in the same four channels using a larger dataset that finds a significant excess in the $m(\ell_1,\ell_2,p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ spectrum at a mass between 0.25 and 2.45 TeV with the $g_{1,2}=0$ assumption would invalidate the exclusion claim; alternatively, a dedicated control-region test showing that the ABCD prediction $N_A = N_B N_D / N_C$ fails as $m(e,\mu,p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ increases would undermine the background estimate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the invariant mass of the visible lepton pair plus missing transverse momentum, $m(\ell_1,\ell_2,p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$, in four final states ($\mu\tau_h$, $e\tau_h$, $\tau_h\tau_h$, and $e\mu$) shows no broad enhancement above the standard model background. Using the CLs method, the analysis excludes a Z' boson decaying to $\tau^+\tau^-$ with mass below 2.45 TeV, and a Z' boson decaying to $W^+W^-$ with mass below 1.60 TeV, for a 50% branching fraction and the maximal Z'-WW coupling. These exclusions hold for models with suppressed couplings to light fermions ($g_{1,2}=0$) and are the first limits on VBF-produced Z' bosons with nonuniversal fermion couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The background estimates rely on transfer factors measured in control regions without the VBF selection, and the central assumption is that these factors (the antiISO tau_h misidentification ratios, VBF selection efficiencies, and the ABCD relation) remain valid in the signal region after the VBF and missing-transverse-momentum requirements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the result is correct, Z' models with dominant third-generation couplings and weak couplings to light quarks are constrained for the first time in the VBF production mode.
  • The VBF channel provides complementary sensitivity to traditional Drell-Yan searches, particularly for models with suppressed light-quark couplings.
  • For $Z'\to\tau^+\tau^-$, increasing the light-fermion coupling $g_{1,2}$ weakens the limits, while for $Z'\to W^+W^-$ it strengthens them because of the W boson mass, as shown in the four signal model scenarios.
  • The $\tau_h\tau_h$ channel drives the ditau exclusion while the $e\mu$ channel dominates the WW exclusion, meaning future improvements in tau identification or lepton acceptance would directly extend the reach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same VBF analysis strategy could be applied to other new-physics signatures that produce forward jets and a high-mass dilepton-plus-missing-mass resonance, such as charged Higgs bosons or heavy neutrinos, without reoptimizing the core tag.
  • Because the limits depend on the assumed branching fraction and the parameter $\kappa_V$, the published HEPData tables allow reinterpretation in any specific Z' model; a model with a smaller WW branching fraction would escape the quoted exclusions.
  • With the full Run 3 dataset of about 300 fb^-1 at 13.6 TeV, the mass reach could extend beyond 2.45 TeV in the ditau channel, assuming similar background performance and no signal.
  • The data-driven background methods, especially the antiISO transfer factors, could be cross-checked in the Run 3 dataset against the growing simulated samples, and any discrepancy would indicate the limits are not as robust as presented.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports a search for a heavy neutral Z' gauge boson with nonuniversal fermion couplings, produced via vector boson fusion and decaying to tau pairs or W boson pairs, using 138 fb^-1 of CMS data at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV. Four final states (mu tau_h, e tau_h, tau_h tau_h, e mu) are combined, with data-driven estimates for the dominant backgrounds and a profile-likelihood CLs analysis of the m(lepton pair, pT^miss) spectra. The observed data are consistent with the standard model. The paper sets 95% CL upper limits on the product of the VBF Z' cross section and the branching fraction, and converts these into mass exclusions of 2.45 TeV (tau tau) and 1.60 TeV (WW) at a 50% branching fraction and kappa_V = 1.

Significance. The VBF production topology is a genuinely new handle for third-generation-friendly Z' models, and the analysis is careful in its use of data-driven control regions, transfer factors, and closure tests. The model-independent sigma x B limits are credible and the HEPData record aids reuse. The central weakness is that the mass exclusions rely on LO signal cross sections without a quoted theory-scale uncertainty, and the summary's novelty claim is stronger than the literature supports. If the scale-uncertainty issue is addressed, this would be a solid and useful result for the exotics program.

major comments (1)
  1. [Signal model and systematic uncertainties] The predicted pp -> Z' jj cross sections used to convert the observed sigma x B upper limits into mass exclusions are computed at LO with MadGraph, and the systematics paragraph lists PDF, luminosity, object-identification, and closure uncertainties but no factorization/renormalization scale uncertainty on the signal normalization. Since the signal cross section falls steeply with mass (199.4 fb at 1 TeV and 0.7504 fb at 2.5 TeV in the Fig. 1 caption), a conservative 30-50% LO scale uncertainty shifts the excluded-mass boundary by roughly 0.1-0.2 TeV at the quoted 2.45 TeV limit. Please propagate a scale uncertainty into the limit-setting procedure or, at minimum, quote the resulting range on the mass exclusions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract says upper limits are set but does not state the confidence level; the 95% CL appears only later in the text. Please add "at 95% confidence level" to the abstract.
  2. [Summary paragraph] The final sentence, "These are the first limits to date on models with nonuniversal fermion couplings," overstates the novelty: earlier dilepton and ditau searches (Refs. [11-21]) already constrain such models, and Refs. [22,24] explicitly discuss third-family couplings. Please rephrase to "first limits from VBF production of such models" or similar.
  3. [Header and DOI] The header states "Published in Physical Review Letters as doi:10.1103/srvm-f1h3"; this DOI string is not in the standard journal format and the publication claim should be verified or removed.
  4. [Systematic uncertainties paragraph] The PDF uncertainty is described as derived by comparing CTEQ6.6L, MSTW08, and NNPDF10 sets, even though the event generation uses NNPDF3.0/3.1 as the default; please clarify that this is an envelope test and how it relates to the nominal PDF set.
  5. [Background estimation and closure tests] The text states that closure tests "reproduce the expected distributions in both rate and shape" and quotes "<20% for all processes" for the closure uncertainty, but does not give per-channel closure values; reporting the per-channel closure ratios for the mu tau_h and e tau_h misidentification backgrounds would strengthen the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chain is self-contained, with signal parameters scanned rather than fitted and backgrounds estimated from independent control regions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain runs from observed m(ell1,ell2,pTmiss) spectra, through data-driven background estimates obtained in control regions, to CLs upper limits on sigma x B, and finally to mass exclusions by comparing those limits with LO MadGraph signal cross sections for scanned model parameters (g1,2, g3, kappaV). No quantity in the chain is defined in terms of a fitted parameter taken from the same data: the model couplings are inputs varied over a grid, the branching-fraction assumption (50%) is stated explicitly, and the transfer factors (antiISO tau_h misID ratios, VBF selection efficiencies, ABCD closure in the e-mu channel) are measured in control regions that are disjoint from the signal region by design (failing VBF, b-tag, isolation, or pTmiss selections). The closure tests described in the text are genuine internal consistency checks, not circular reductions. The only substantive concerns are those raised by the skeptic: the LO signal normalization carries no explicit factorization/renormalization scale uncertainty in the quoted systematics, and the data-driven transfer factors assume CR-to-SR validity. These are systematic-uncertainty or modeling-risk issues, not circularity: they do not make any output equal to an input by construction. There is no self-citation chain on which the central claim rests; the simplified model from Ref. [25] is an external theoretical benchmark with free parameters, not an internally derived 'prediction.' Accordingly the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard model background simulations, data-driven extrapolations, and a simplified Z' model from prior literature. The headline mass limits depend on benchmark choices (50% branching fraction and kappa_V = 1.0). No new particles or entities are invented by this paper.

free parameters (3)
  • Branching fraction B(Z' -> tau+tau-) = 50% (benchmark)
    The headline mass limit of 2.45 TeV assumes a 50% branching fraction to tau pairs; limits for other branching fractions are shown in Fig. 2 and vary substantially.
  • Branching fraction B(Z' -> W+W-) = 50% (benchmark)
    The headline WW mass limit of 1.60 TeV assumes a 50% branching fraction; limits depend on this assumption.
  • kappa_V (Z' coupling to W bosons) = 1.0 (maximal)
    The 2.45 TeV tau-tau limit is for kappa_V = 1.0; for kappa_V = 0.1 the limit drops to 1 TeV (SPM1). This is a chosen benchmark point.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SM background predictions from Monte Carlo generators (MadGraph, POWHEG, PYTHIA) are accurate.
    Used for W+jets, Z+jets, t t-bar, diboson, and single-top backgrounds; normalized to NNLO/NLO cross sections but still subject to generator modeling uncertainties.
  • domain assumption Data-driven transfer factors measured in control regions are valid in the signal region.
    The antiISO tau_h misID ratios, VBF selection efficiencies, Z-enriched SFs, and ABCD method rely on extrapolation from control regions to signal regions; closure tests support this assumption.
  • domain assumption The simplified model of Ref. [25] describes VBF Z' production with Z-like couplings.
    Signal samples are generated with this model; the limits are model-dependent, and models with anomalous Z-Z' couplings or Z'/gamma decays are not considered.
  • standard math The asymptotic approximation of the CLs profile likelihood ratio is valid in the low-event-count bins.
    Used for 95% CL upper limits; asymptotic formulas can be inaccurate in bins with very few events, though this is standard in CMS analyses.
  • domain assumption No anomalous Z'Z gamma coupling is present.
    The paper states 'We do not consider anomalous couplings between the Z' boson and the Z/gamma bosons of the SM'; if such couplings exist, Z' decays to Z/gamma would alter branching fractions and limits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for a neutral gauge boson with nonuniversal fermion couplings in vector boson fusion processes in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VLMTJKUD

@misc{pith2026241219261,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for a neutral gauge boson with nonuniversal fermion couplings in vector boson fusion processes in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrts$ = 13 TeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VLMTJKUD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19261}
}
abstract

The first search for a heavy neutral spin-1 gauge boson (Z') with nonuniversal fermion couplings produced via vector boson fusion processes and decaying to tau leptons or W bosons is presented. The analysis is performed using LHC data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, collected from 2016 to 2018 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The data are consistent with the standard model predictions. Upper limits are set on the product of the cross section for production of the Z' boson and its branching fraction to $\tau\tau$ or WW. The presence of a Z' boson decaying to $\tau^+\tau^-$ (W$^+$W$^-$) is excluded for masses up to 2.45 (1.60) TeV, depending on the Z' boson coupling to SM weak bosons, and assuming a Z' $\to$ $\tau^+\tau^-$ (W$^+$W$^-$) branching fraction of 50%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19261 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observed m(ℓ1 , ℓ2 , p miss T ) for the data, and the postfit backgrounds (stacked his￾tograms), in the signal region for the µτh (upper left), eτh (upper right), τh τh (lower left), and eµ (lower right) channels. The lower panels show ratios of the data to the prefit back￾ground prediction and postfit background yields as red open squares and blue points, respec￾tively. The gray band in the lower panels indicates t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Combined 95% CL lower limits on mZ′ as a function of the Z′ branching fraction to τ +τ − (upper row) and W+W− (lower row) for the g1, 2 = 0 (left column) and g1, 2 = 1 (right column) scenario. The red, green, and blue curves show the observed limits corresponding to κV equal to 0.1, 0.5, and 1, respectively. The dashed curves and shaded bands show the expected limits with their 68% CL percentile bands. Acknowledgmen… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions R(D∗) and R(D0)

    LHCb Collaboration, “Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions R(D∗) and R(D0)”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 111802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.111802, arXiv:2302.02886

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021

    W. Altmannshofer and P . Stangl, “New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 952, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09725-1 , arXiv:2103.13370

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Probing the minimalU(1)X model at future electron-positron colliders via fermion pair-production channels

    A. Das, P . S. B. Dev, Y. Hosotani, and S. Mandal, “Probing the minimalU(1)X model at future electron-positron colliders via fermion pair-production channels”, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.115030, arXiv:2104.10902

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    LHC di-lepton searches for Z′ bosons which explain measurements of b → sl +l− transitions

    B. Allanach, “LHC di-lepton searches for Z′ bosons which explain measurements of b → sl +l− transitions”, Phys. Lett. B 858 (2024) 139055, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139055, arXiv:2404.14748

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Topcolor Assisted Technicolor

    C. T. Hill, “Topcolor assisted technicolor”, Phys. Lett. B 345 (1995) 483, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)01660-5, arXiv:hep-ph/9411426

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  6. [6]

    A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370, arXiv:hep-ph/9905221

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    An alternative to compactification

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “An alternative to compactification”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690, arXiv:hep-th/9906064

    arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    Experimental probes of localized gravity: on and off the wall

    H. Davoudiasl, J. L. Hewett, and T. G. Rizzo, “Experimental probes of localized gravity: on and off the wall”, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 075004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.075004, arXiv:hep-ph/0006041

    arXiv 2001

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Implications ofE(6) grand unification

    P . K. Mohapatra, R. N. Mohapatra, and P . B. Pal, “Implications ofE(6) grand unification”, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 2010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.33.2010

    1986 doi

  2. [10]

    Extra gauge bosons in E(6)

    D. London and J. L. Rosner, “Extra gauge bosons in E(6)”, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 1530, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1530

    1986 doi

  3. [11]

    Search for additional neutral gauge bosons

    D0 Collaboration, “Search for additional neutral gauge bosons”, Phys. Lett. B 385 (1996) 471, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00932-X

    1996 doi

  4. [12]

    Search for a heavy neutral gauge boson in the dielectron channel with 5.4 fb−1 of p ¯p collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV

    D0 Collaboration, “Search for a heavy neutral gauge boson in the dielectron channel with 5.4 fb−1 of p ¯p collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 88, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.10.059, arXiv:1008.2023. 10

    2011 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Search for high mass resonances decaying to muon pairs in√s = 1.96 TeV p¯p Collisions

    CDF Collaboration, “Search for high mass resonances decaying to muon pairs in√s = 1.96 TeV p¯p Collisions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 121801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.121801, arXiv:1101.4578

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Search for high-mass resonances decaying into τ-lepton pairs in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for high-mass resonances decaying into τ-lepton pairs in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 82, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.07.062, arXiv:1206.1725

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Search for heavy narrow dilepton resonances in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV and √s = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for heavy narrow dilepton resonances in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV and √s = 8 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 720 (2013) 63, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.02.003, arXiv:1212.6175

    2013 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Search for narrow resonances in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV and combination with 8 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for narrow resonances in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV and combination with 8 TeV data”, Phys. Lett. B 768 (2017) 57, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.010, arXiv:1609.05391

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying to tau lepton pairs in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying to tau lepton pairs in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 02 (2017) 048, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)048, arXiv:1611.06594

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb −1 of pp collision data collected at √s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb −1 of pp collision data collected at √s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 68, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.016, arXiv:1903.06248

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 07 (2021) 208, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)208, arXiv:2103.02708

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, JHEP 01 (2018) 055, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)055, arXiv:1709.07242

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 051801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.051801, arXiv:2002.12223

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-pT tau lepton searches at LHC

    D. A. Faroughy, A. Greljo, and J. F. Kamenik, “Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-pT tau lepton searches at LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 126, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.11.011, arXiv:1609.07138

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    The physics of heavyZ′ gauge bosons

    P . Langacker, “The physics of heavyZ′ gauge bosons”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1199, arXiv:0801.1345

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Finding Z′ bosons coupled preferentially to the third family at LEP and the Tevatron

    K. R. Lynch, E. H. Simmons, M. Narain, and S. Mrenna, “Finding Z′ bosons coupled preferentially to the third family at LEP and the Tevatron”, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 035006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.035006, arXiv:hep-ph/0007286

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Searching for new heavy neutral gauge bosons using vector boson fusion processes at the LHC

    A. Fl ´orez et al., “Searching for new heavy neutral gauge bosons using vector boson fusion processes at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 126, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.062, arXiv:1609.09765

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3 (2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004. References 11

    2008 doi

  19. [27]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JINST 15 (2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”, JINST 12 (2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020, arXiv:1609.02366

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST 19 (2024) P11021, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 16 (2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014, arXiv:2012.06888

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015, arXiv:1804.04528

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”, JINST 9 (2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009, arXiv:1405.6569

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”, JINST 12 (2017) P10003, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid

    CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015

    2015

  27. [35]

    Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”, JINST 15 (2020) P09018, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/P09018, arXiv:2003.00503

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Pileup per particle identification

    D. Bertolini, P . Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”, JHEP 10 (2014) 059, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059, arXiv:1407.6013

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP 04 (2008) 063, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063, arXiv:0802.1189

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 , arXiv:1111.6097

    2012 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV using the CMS detector”, JINST 14 (2019) P07004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004, arXiv:1903.06078

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”, JINST 12 (2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014, arXiv:1607.03663

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011, arXiv:1712.07158. 12

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Performance of reconstruction and identification of τ leptons decaying to hadrons and ντ in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of reconstruction and identification of τ leptons decaying to hadrons and ντ in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P10005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10005, arXiv:1809.02816

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network”, JINST 17 (2022) P07023, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/07/P07023, arXiv:2201.08458

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Tau reconstruction and identification with particle-flow techniques using the CMS detector at LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Tau reconstruction and identification with particle-flow techniques using the CMS detector at LHC”, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 189 (2009) 311, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2009.03.051

    2009 doi

  37. [45]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    2004 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”, JHEP 11 (2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092

    2007 arXiv

  40. [48]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”, JHEP 06 (2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012

    2015 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Electroweak production of two jets in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Electroweak production of two jets in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 589, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6049-9 , arXiv:1712.09814

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 155, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x , arXiv:1512.00815

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 , arXiv:1903.12179

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Parton distributions for the LHC run II

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC run II”, JHEP 04 (2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040, arXiv:1410.8849

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 663, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5 , arXiv:1706.00428

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    G EANT 4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “G EANT 4—a simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8. References 13

    2003 doi

  48. [56]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 , arXiv:2104.01927

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

    2017

  50. [58]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s = 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019

    2018

  51. [59]

    PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

    J. Butterworth et al., “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II”, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001, arXiv:1510.03865

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables

    P . M. Nadolsky et al., “Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables”, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.013004, arXiv:0802.0007

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Update of parton distributions at NNLO

    A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt, “Update of parton distributions at NNLO”, Phys. Lett. B 652 (2007) 292, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.07.040, arXiv:0706.0459

    2007 arXiv

  54. [62]

    NNPDF1.0 parton set for the LHC

    M. Ubiali, “NNPDF1.0 parton set for the LHC”, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 186 (2009) 62, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2008.12.020, arXiv:0809.3716

    2009 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 , arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z ]

    2011 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics

    T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2

    1999 doi

  57. [65]

    Presentation of search results: the CL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the CL s technique”, J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    2002 doi

  58. [66]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: C OMBINE

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: C OMBINE ”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19, doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 , arXiv:2404.06614

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    doi:10.17182/hepdata.155915

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2024. doi:10.17182/hepdata.155915. 14 15 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan1 Institut f ¨ ur Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, Austria W. Adam , J.W. Andrejkovic, L. Benato , T. Bergauer , ...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.