Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 71 references

Yangian symmetry, GKZ equations and integrable Feynman graphs in conformal variables

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that for Loom-type conformal Feynman integrals, the level-one Yangian momentum generator acts in cross-ratio variables as the explicit second-order operators PDE_{ik} given in (4.21), so Yangian invariance is equivalent to…

desk verdict First general explicit Yangian equations in cross-ratios, with a smart GKZ connection, but the 'any dimension' claim outruns what is actually proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19296 v1 pith:BVK7IJF6 submitted 2024-12-26 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Fedor Levkovich-Maslyuk , Victor Mishnyakov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords YangiansymmetryconformalFeynmanintegralsLoomgraphscross-ratiovariablesGKZhypergeometricsystemsfishnettheoriesdualA-hypergeometricfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out the general differential equations that express Yangian symmetry for Loom-type conformal Feynman integrals, the graphs that come from integrable fishnet theories. It derives, for any spacetime dimension and any choice of cross-ratio basis, the explicit action of the level-one Yangian momentum generator in conformal cross-ratio variables: invariance is equivalent to the system $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik} I^{(0)}=0$, with $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}$ given by the compact formula (4.21). The formula reproduces the known equations for the four-point cross, the six-point double-cross, and the six-point cross, and extends them to arbitrary graphs. A large part of the operators is shown to be built from GKZ hypergeometric operators (the classical $\mathcal{A}$-hypergeometric equations associated to a toric matrix), and for certain nontrivial graphs the Yangian system becomes exactly a GKZ system, meaning the integrals should be expressible through the corresponding $\mathcal{A}$-hypergeometric functions. The paper also argues that, for this class, Yangian invariance is essentially equivalent to the ordinary conformal constraints plus dual conformal constraints on each face.

What carries the argument

The central object is the level-one momentum generator of the conformal Yangian, rewritten as a second-order differential operator in cross-ratio variables. The key identity is (4.20), $(-i)\hat P^{\mu} = -2\sum_{i<k} (x_{ik}^{\mu}/x_{ik}^2)\,\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}(\xi)$; when the vectors $x_{ik}^{\mu}/x_{ik}^2$ are independent, vanishing of the generator is exactly the system $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}=0$. The operators $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}$ are built from the first-order cross-ratio derivatives $\theta_{ij}=\sum_A \alpha^A_{ij}\xi_A \partial_{\xi_A}+\beta_{ij}$ and the standard four-point cross-ratios $\chi_{iklj}$, and they carry the argument because they translate the algebraic Yangian symmetry into concrete differential equations for the reduced integral. The GKZ connection is carried by the operators $\hat L_{iklj}=\partial^2/\partial x^2_{ik}\partial x^2_{lj}-\partial^2/\partial x^2_{il}\partial x^2_{kj}$, which lie in the GKZ ideal for the toric matrix $\mathcal{A}_{i,jk}=\delta_{ij}+\delta_{ik}$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the four-point cross integral in $D=2$, where the vectors $x_{ik}^{\mu}/x_{ik}^2$ are linearly dependent: if $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}I^{(0)}=0$ fails to hold individually while the combined Ward identity (4.20) still vanishes, then the paper's central independence assumption is violated and the general system requires a low-dimensional reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the assumption that the spacetime dimension is large enough for the vectors $x_{ik}^{\mu}/x_{ik}^2$ to be independent, the level-one Yangian momentum generator acts on a conformal Loom integral as $(-i)\hat P^{\mu} = -2\sum_{i<k} (x_{ik}^{\mu}/x_{ik}^2)\,\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}(\xi)$, where $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}$ is the explicit second-order operator (4.21) acting only on cross-ratios. Yangian invariance therefore means $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik} I^{(0)}=0$ for all pairs $i<k$. The paper derives this operator from first principles, checks it against the known equations for the four-point cross, six-point double-cross, and six-point cross, and shows that consistency plus non-reducibility of the resulting system reproduces the allowed parameter ranges for four-point Yangian graphs. It then rewrites the second-order part of $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}$ in terms of GKZ-type operators $\mathcal{L}^{\kappa}_{iklj}$, finds that the leftover terms contain only first derivatives, and for four-point, five-point, and $N$-cross cases exhibits parameters for which the remainder vanishes exactly; there the Yangian system is precisely a GKZ system with toric matrix $\mathcal{A}_{i,jk}=\delta_{ij}+\delta_{ik}$ and $b_i=-\Delta_i$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument that Yangian invariance implies the full system $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}I^{(0)}=0$ depends on the vectors $x_{ik}^{\mu}/x_{ik}^2$ being linearly independent as functions of the external positions, which the paper expects for sufficiently large dimension but does not prove; in low dimension the cross-ratios themselves become dependent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any Loom graph, the Yangian equations can be written down explicitly in cross-ratio variables without computing the integral, for any spacetime dimension and any cross-ratio basis.
  • For graphs where the remainder vanishes, the Feynman integral is constrained by a GKZ system, so the $\mathcal{A}$-hypergeometric solution theory applies and the integral belongs to the same function basis as the $N$-cross integral.
  • Consistency and non-reducibility for four-point Yangian integrals force the external dimensions to satisfy one of three relations, matching the cross and double-cross topologies.
  • Yangian invariance for planar graphs in this class is controlled by the vertex and face constraints (3.3)–(3.4), which rule out some topologies entirely, such as the Kagome-type six-point star.
  • The five-point pentagon graphs with the listed dimension conditions satisfy the same GKZ system as the five-cross, so their integrals are linear combinations of the same $\mathcal{A}$-hypergeometric basis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the identification with GKZ systems suggests a practical route to computation — for graphs with vanishing remainder, one can skip star-triangle reductions and fix the coefficients in the $\mathcal{A}$-hypergeometric basis by symmetries and boundary conditions; the pentagon of figure 7 is a concrete test case.
  • Inference: if the linear-independence assumption fails in low dimensions, the Ward identity would give only linear relations among the $\mathrm{PDE}_{ik}$, so a rank-reduction of the system (possibly by analytic continuation in $D$) should yield the correct low-dimensional equations.
  • Inference: the proposed equivalence between Yangian invariance and the pair of constraints (3.3)–(3.4) turns integrability into a purely combinatorial check on propagator powers, which could be used to scan families of planar graphs for Yangian symmetry without constructing a Baxter lattice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives an explicit general form of the Yangian differential equations in conformal cross-ratio variables for a large class of conformal Feynman integrals (Loom graphs). The main formula, Eq. (1.1)/(4.21), expresses the level-one Yangian momentum generator acting on the reduced function I^(0) as a sum of second-order operators PDE_{ik} built from first-order cross-ratio derivatives theta_{ij} and four-point cross-ratios chi. The paper argues that Yangian invariance is equivalent to PDE_{ik} I^(0)=0, gives consistency conditions on the graph parameters, identifies a GKZ hypergeometric part in the equations, and discusses cases where the Yangian system reduces exactly to a GKZ system, e.g. pentagon graphs with five external legs. It also proposes a simple necessary-and-sufficient condition (conformal plus dual-conformal constraints) for Yangian invariance of a graph. The central derivation is sketched rather than fully displayed, but the final equations are checked against three published examples: the 4-point cross, the 6-point double-cross in D=4, and the 6-point cross.

Significance. If the main formula and the step from the operator identity to the PDE system are correct, this is a useful and nontrivial generalization: it provides, for the first time, a closed explicit form of the Yangian Ward identities in cross-ratio variables for arbitrary Loom-type graphs, beyond the specific examples treated in [23]. The paper also offers a fresh viewpoint on the relation between Yangian equations and GKZ systems, and it makes a concrete testable statement about the function basis for certain pentagon integrals. The consistency checks against three known cases are a real strength, as are the authors' explicit statements of which steps are conjectural. The significance is, however, tempered by two unresolved load-bearing points: the unproven linear independence of the vectors x_{ik}^\mu/x_{ik}^2 that underlies the passage from Eq. (4.20) to the claimed PDE system, and the conjectural character of the reduction of the Yangian system to individual GKZ operators. These do not destroy the paper's value, but they must be addressed before the advertised claims can be taken at face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.20)–(4.21)] The step from the operator identity (4.20) to the system (4.10) requires the vectors x_{ik}^\mu/x_{ik}^2 (1≤i<k≤N) to be linearly independent as functions of the external positions. The paper states this is expected for 'large enough' dimension (Section 4.2) and concedes in Section 6 that the derivation is incomplete when the dimension is too small, but no proof is given. This is not a technicality: for the 6-point double-cross in D=4, which the paper lists as a successful check against [23], there are 15 such vector-valued functions in a 4-dimensional space, so they cannot be independent. In that situation (4.20) implies only that some linear combination of the PDE_{ik} vanishes; the equivalence between Yangian invariance and the explicit system PDE_{ik}=0 is not established by the argument. The abstract's 'valid for any spacetime dimension' is therefore stronger than what Section 4 actually proves. Please either prove the independence (or a suitable replacement statement) or restate the main theorem with the dimension assumption made explicit, and explain how the small-dimensional cases are recovered.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.19)] The central computation leading to the main formula (1.1) is only sketched: the paper writes 'after rather lengthy calculations' and Eq. (4.13) contains unspecified '...' terms. Since (1.1) is the paper's principal result, the reader cannot verify the algebra from the text; the three consistency checks are evidence but not a derivation. Please include the full computation in the main text or an appendix, or provide a computer-algebra-verifiable derivation; this is a load-bearing point because the claimed general form must be checkable beyond the few examples.
  3. [Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.3)–(3.4)] The claim that the combination of conformal invariance (3.3) and dual conformal invariance (3.4) is necessary and sufficient for Yangian invariance is presented as a conjecture with a local geometric argument in Appendix A; the paper itself says 'we expect that a fully rigorous proof can be established as well' and 'we believe that this simple prescription concisely describes which graphs... can or can not be Yangian invariant.' Since this is a stated side result, the paper should clearly separate this conjecture from the established statements in the rest of the paper, and not present it as one of the main conclusions without qualification.
  4. [Section 5.1 and 5.4] The reduction of the Yangian PDEs to individual GKZ operators L^i_k relies on two unproven assumptions: the vanishing of the remainder R^kappa_{ik} in (5.6) (verified only for certain cases), and the claim that 'at least up to 5 points' the individual operators can be linearly expressed in terms of L^kappa_{ik}, with the higher-point argument left as a sketch. Consequently, the statement in Section 5.4 that the pentagon graph of Figure 7 will be expressed in the same hypergeometric basis as the 5-cross integral is conditional on these assumptions. The text does make this caveat in the final paragraph of Section 5.4, but the conclusion is phrased as a definite result earlier in that section; please mark the pentagon statement explicitly as a conjecture unsupported by a complete proof.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The abstract states the equations are 'valid for any spacetime dimension,' while Section 4.2 and Section 6 state that the derivation assumes a large enough dimension (specifically, independence of the vectors and of the x^2_{ij} variables). Please qualify the abstract to avoid overclaiming.
  2. [Section 4.2, text below Eq. (4.20)] The indices in Eq. (4.9) use x^\mu_{ik} with a two-letter subscript, while Eq. (4.20) uses x^\mu_{ik} with i<k; the notation should be made uniform, and the antisymmetry PDE_{ik}=-PDE_{ki} that is used to pass from (4.19) to (4.20) is not explicitly displayed before the step.
  3. [Section 4.3.2 and Eq. (5.8)] The notation '+ symmetries' in Eqs. (5.8c) and (5.8d) is ambiguous; please specify explicitly which permutations of the external indices are allowed (the text gives some examples, but not a complete list).
  4. [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.6)] The decomposition PDE_{ik} = L^kappa_{ik} + R^kappa_{ik} is stated with 'we find' and the explicit form of R^kappa_{ik} is not given; please provide at least the explicit first-order derivative terms or state where they can be found, since the vanishing of R^kappa_{ik} is used as a criterion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the general Yangian equations are obtained by direct computation from the level-one Yangian generator, and the one independence assumption is explicitly flagged rather than hidden.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a direct computation, not a fit or a renaming. Starting from the level-one momentum generator (4.8) and the conformal decomposition (4.7), the authors compute the action on the cross-ratio function and arrive at the operator identity (4.20), from which the explicit operators PDE_ik in (1.1)/(4.21) follow. The operators are derived, not chosen to match known examples; the later agreement with the 4-point cross, 6-point double-cross, and 6-point cross equations of [23] is presented as a check. The evaluation parameters s_i are imported from the earlier Loom construction [32], which is a self-citation by two of the three authors, but it is a parameter-free input to the present computation, not a conclusion that the present derivation reproduces. The main caveat is the step from (4.20) to PDE_ik = 0, which uses the expected linear independence of the vectors x^mu_ik/x^2_ik. The paper openly states that this is expected only for 'large enough' dimension, that the strict validity is limited to that case, and that a completely general derivation is left to future work. That is a correctness gap or conjecture, not circularity: if the independence fails, the argument yields a weaker linear relation, but it does not make the target equations equivalent to the inputs by construction. The GKZ identifications in Section 5 are likewise presented as observations and partial results with the necessary technical steps deferred, so they do not reduce a prediction to its own assumption.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted numerical parameters. It relies on prior results for Yangian invariance and evaluation parameters (ref [32]), on the large-D independence of certain kinematic vectors, on the regime N <= D+2, and on the non-reducibility assumption. The kappa-shifted GKZ operators are auxiliary rewriting tools, not additional physical degrees of freedom.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Feynman integrals of Loom graphs are annihilated by the level-one Yangian momentum generator with evaluation parameters specified by (2.13).
    Basis of the paper; taken from previous work [32] by the same authors. Not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption For sufficiently large spacetime dimension relative to the number of external points, the vectors x_ik^mu / x_ik^2 are linearly independent, so the coefficients in (4.20) must vanish separately.
    Needed to go from the operator identity (4.20) to the PDE system (4.21). Acknowledged as an assumption in Sec 4.2; for small D cross-ratios become dependent.
  • domain assumption The number of external points satisfies N <= D+2 so that the number of independent cross-ratios is N(N-3)/2.
    Stated in Sec 4.1; used throughout. Not valid in the complementary regime.
  • domain assumption The Feynman integrals considered are non-reducible, i.e., do not satisfy any first-order differential equation in the cross-ratios.
    Imposed in Sec 4.3 to derive consistency conditions (4.24); excludes trivial graphs.
  • standard math GKZ systems used have the standard solution theory (A-hypergeometric series form a basis).
    Review of GKZ theory in Sec 5.2; standard.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Yangian symmetry, GKZ equations and integrable Feynman graphs in conformal variables." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BVK7IJF6

@misc{pith2026241219296,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Yangian symmetry, GKZ equations and integrable Feynman graphs in conformal variables},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BVK7IJF6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19296}
}
read the original abstract

We study the differential equations that follow from Yangian symmetry which was recently observed for a large class of conformal Feynman graphs, originating from integrable `fishnet' theories. We derive, for the first time, the explicit general form of these equations in the most useful conformal cross-ratio variables, valid for any spacetime dimension. This allows us to explore their properties in detail. In particular, we observe that for general Feynman graphs a large set of terms in the Yangian equations can be identified with famous GKZ (Gelfand-Kapranov-Zelevinsky) hypergeometric operators. We also show that for certain nontrivial graphs the relation with GKZ systems is exact, opening the way to using new powerful solution methods. As a side result, we also elucidate the constraints on the topology and parameter space of Feynman graphs stemming from Yangian invariance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Loebbert, D

    F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller and H. M¨ unkler,Yangian Bootstrap for Conformal Feynman Integrals , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 066006 [ 1912.05561]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [1]

    Weinzierl, Feynman Integrals (1, 2022), 10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4, [ 2201.03593]

    S. Weinzierl, Feynman Integrals (1, 2022), 10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4, [ 2201.03593]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [2]

    Vanhove, Feynman integrals, toric geometry and mirror symmetry , in KMPB Conference: Elliptic Integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theory , pp

    P. Vanhove, Feynman integrals, toric geometry and mirror symmetry , in KMPB Conference: Elliptic Integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theory , pp. 415–458, 2019, DOI [1807.11466]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [3]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto and C. Duhr, The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 3: Mathematical structures in Feynman integrals, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 443004 [ 2203.13014]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [4]

    Bl¨ umlein and C

    J. Bl¨ umlein and C. Schneider,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 4: Multi-loop Feynman integrals, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 443005 [ 2203.13015]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Bourjaily et al., Functions Beyond Multiple Polylogarithms for Precision Collider Physics , in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [ 2203.07088]

    J.L. Bourjaily et al., Functions Beyond Multiple Polylogarithms for Precision Collider Physics , in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [ 2203.07088]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Beisert et al., Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview , Lett

    N. Beisert et al., Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview , Lett. Math. Phys. 99 (2012) 3 [1012.3982]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [7]

    Zamolodchikov, ’Fishnet’ diagrams as a completely integrable system , Phys

    A.B. Zamolodchikov, ’Fishnet’ diagrams as a completely integrable system , Phys. Lett. 97B (1980) 63

    work page 1980

Show all 71 references
  1. [8]

    G¨ urdo˘ gan and V

    O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and V. Kazakov,New Integrable 4D Quantum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed Planar 𝒩 = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 201602 [ 1512.06704]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. Mueller and D.-l. Zhong, Yangian Symmetry for Bi-Scalar Loop Amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2017) 003 [ 1704.01967]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. Mueller and D.-l. Zhong, Yangian Symmetry for Fishnet Feynman Graphs, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 121901 [ 1708.00007]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Loebbert and H

    F. Loebbert and H. Mathur, The Feyn-Structure of Yangian Symmetry , 2410.11936

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert, Geometry from integrability: multi-leg fishnet integrals in two dimensions , JHEP 07 (2024) 008 [ 2402.19034]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Loebbert and S.F

    F. Loebbert and S.F. Stawinski, Conformal four-point integrals: recursive structure, Toda equations and double copy, JHEP 11 (2024) 092 [ 2408.15331]. – 31 –

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert, The Basso-Dixon formula and Calabi-Yau geometry, JHEP 03 (2024) 177 [ 2310.08625]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Loebbert, Integrability for Feynman Integrals, 12, 2022 [ 2212.09636]

    F. Loebbert, Integrability for Feynman Integrals, 12, 2022 [ 2212.09636]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert, Yangian-invariant fishnet integrals in 2 dimensions as volumes of calabi-yau varieties , 2209.05291

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Corcoran, F

    L. Corcoran, F. Loebbert and J. Miczajka, Yangian ward identities for fishnet four-point integrals , JHEP 04 (2022) 131 [ 2112.06928]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Loebbert and J

    F. Loebbert and J. Miczajka, Massive Integrability: From Fishnet Theories to Feynman Graphs and Back, PoS EPS-HEP2021 (2022) 733 [ 2109.11937]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Corcoran, F

    L. Corcoran, F. Loebbert, J. Miczajka and M. Staudacher, Minkowski Box from Yangian Bootstrap , JHEP 04 (2021) 160 [ 2012.07852]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Loebbert, J

    F. Loebbert, J. Miczajka, D. M¨ uller and H. M¨ unkler,Yangian Bootstrap for Massive Feynman Integrals, SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 010 [ 2010.08552]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Loebbert and J

    F. Loebbert and J. Miczajka, Massive Fishnets, JHEP 12 (2020) 197 [ 2008.11739]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Loebbert, J

    F. Loebbert, J. Miczajka, D. M¨ uller and H. M¨ unkler,Massive Conformal Symmetry and Integrability for Feynman Integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 091602 [ 2005.01735]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Chicherin and G.P

    D. Chicherin and G.P. Korchemsky, The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 9: Integrability of amplitudes in fishnet theories , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 443010 [ 2203.13020]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Drummond, J.M

    J.M. Drummond, J.M. Henn and J. Plefka, Yangian symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 05 (2009) 046 [ 0902.2987]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Drummond, J

    J.M. Drummond, J. Henn, G.P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev, Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory , Nucl. Phys. B 828 (2010) 317 [ 0807.1095]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Beisert, J

    N. Beisert, J. Henn, T. McLoughlin and J. Plefka, One-Loop Superconformal and Yangian Symmetries of Scattering Amplitudes in N=4 Super Yang-Mills , JHEP 04 (2010) 085 [ 1002.1733]

    2010 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Arkani-Hamed, J.L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J.L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A.B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes , Cambridge University Press (4, 2016), 10.1017/CBO9781316091548, [1212.5605]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Huang and A.E

    Y.-t. Huang and A.E. Lipstein, Dual Superconformal Symmetry of N=6 Chern-Simons Theory , JHEP 11 (2010) 076 [ 1008.0041]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bargheer, F

    T. Bargheer, F. Loebbert and C. Meneghelli, Symmetries of Tree-level Scattering Amplitudes in N=6 Superconformal Chern-Simons Theory, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 045016 [ 1003.6120]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Beisert, A

    N. Beisert, A. Garus and M. Rosso, Yangian Symmetry and Integrability of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 141603 [ 1701.09162]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Kazakov, F

    V. Kazakov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and V. Mishnyakov, Integrable Feynman Graphs and Yangian Symmetry on the Loom , 2304.04654

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kazakov and E

    V. Kazakov and E. Olivucci, The loom for general fishnet CFTs , JHEP 06 (2023) 041 [ 2212.09732]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kazakov, E

    V. Kazakov, E. Olivucci and M. Preti, Generalized fishnets and exact four-point correlators in chiral CFT4, JHEP 06 (2019) 078 [ 1901.00011]. – 32 –

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Derkachov, V

    S. Derkachov, V. Kazakov and E. Olivucci, Basso-Dixon Correlators in Two-Dimensional Fishnet CFT , 1811.10623

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Alfimov, G

    M. Alfimov, G. Ferrando, V. Kazakov and E. Olivucci, Checkerboard CFT, 2311.01437

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Bezuglov, Calculation of master integrals in terms of elliptic multiple polylogarithms , Int

    M. Bezuglov, Calculation of master integrals in terms of elliptic multiple polylogarithms , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) 2050063 [ 2003.05367]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Kotikov, Differential Equations and Feynman Integrals , in Antidifferentiation and the Calculation of Feynman Amplitudes, 2, 2021, DOI [ 2102.07424]

    A.V. Kotikov, Differential Equations and Feynman Integrals , in Antidifferentiation and the Calculation of Feynman Amplitudes, 2, 2021, DOI [ 2102.07424]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow and M. Zeng, Two-Loop Integrals for Planar Five-Point One-Mass Processes, JHEP 11 (2020) 117 [ 2005.04195]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    B¨ onisch, C

    K. B¨ onisch, C. Duhr, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm and C. Nega, Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization and extensions of Calabi-Yau motives , JHEP 09 (2022) 156 [ 2108.05310]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Lairez and P

    P. Lairez and P. Vanhove, Algorithms for minimal Picard–Fuchs operators of Feynman integrals , Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023) 37 [ 2209.10962]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    de la Cruz and P

    L. de la Cruz and P. Vanhove, Algorithm for differential equations for Feynman integrals in general dimensions, Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 89 [ 2401.09908]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Gel’fand, A.V

    I.M. Gel’fand, A.V. Zelevinskii and M.M. Kapranov, Hypergeometric functions and toral manifolds , Funktsional’nyi Analiz i ego Prilozheniya 23 (1989) 12

    1989

  36. [44]

    Gelfand, M.M

    I.M. Gelfand, M.M. Kapranov and A.V. Zelevinsky, Generalized Euler integrals and A-hypergeometric functions , Adv. Math. 84 (1990) 255

    1990

  37. [45]

    Sturmfels, Solving algebraic equations in terms of a-hypergeometric series , Discrete Mathematics 210 (2000) 171

    B. Sturmfels, Solving algebraic equations in terms of a-hypergeometric series , Discrete Mathematics 210 (2000) 171

    2000

  38. [46]

    Morozov and S

    A. Morozov and S. Shakirov, Introduction to Integral Discriminants, JHEP 12 (2009) 002 [ 0903.2595]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hosono, B.H

    S. Hosono, B.H. Lian and S.-T. Yau, GKZ generalized hypergeometric systems in mirror symmetry of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 182 (1996) 535 [ alg-geom/9511001]

    1996 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Batyrev, Variations of the mixed hodge structure of affine hypersurfaces in algebraic tori ,

    V.V. Batyrev, Variations of the mixed hodge structure of affine hypersurfaces in algebraic tori ,

  41. [49]

    Nasrollahpoursamami, Periods of feynman diagrams and gkz d-modules , arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.04970 (2016)

    E. Nasrollahpoursamami, Periods of feynman diagrams and gkz d-modules , arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.04970 (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    de la Cruz, Feynman integrals as A-hypergeometric functions, JHEP 12 (2019) 123 [ 1907.00507]

    L. de la Cruz, Feynman integrals as A-hypergeometric functions, JHEP 12 (2019) 123 [ 1907.00507]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Grimm and A

    T.W. Grimm and A. Hoefnagels, Reductions of GKZ Systems and Applications to Cosmological Correlators, 2409.13815

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Pal and K

    A. Pal and K. Ray, Conformal integrals in various dimensions and Clifford groups , 2303.17326

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Rigatos and X

    K.C. Rigatos and X. Zhou, Yangian Symmetry in Holographic Correlators , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 101601 [2206.07924]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Loebbert, Lectures on Yangian Symmetry, J

    F. Loebbert, Lectures on Yangian Symmetry, J. Phys. A 49 (2016) 323002 [ 1606.02947]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. Henn, E. Pratt, A.-L. Sattelberger and S. Zoia, D-module techniques for solving differential equations in the context of Feynman integrals , Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 87 [ 2303.11105]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Saito, B

    M. Saito, B. Sturmfels and N. Takayama, Gr¨ obner deformations of hypergeometric differential equations, vol. 6, Springer Science & Business Media (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Ananthanarayan, S

    B. Ananthanarayan, S. Banik, S. Bera and S. Datta, FeynGKZ: A Mathematica package for solving Feynman integrals using GKZ hypergeometric systems , Comput. Phys. Commun. 287 (2023) 108699 [2211.01285]. – 33 –

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Stienstra, GKZ hypergeometric structures, in Instanbul 2005: CIMPA Summer School on Arithmetic and Geometry Around Hypergeometric Functions, 11, 2005 [ math/0511351]

    J. Stienstra, GKZ hypergeometric structures, in Instanbul 2005: CIMPA Summer School on Arithmetic and Geometry Around Hypergeometric Functions, 11, 2005 [ math/0511351]

    2005 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Sattelberger and B

    A.-L. Sattelberger and B. Sturmfels, D-modules and holonomic functions , arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01395 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Gel’fand, M.I

    I.M. Gel’fand, M.I. Graev and S.A. Spirin, Hypergeometric functions and the newton polytope associated with the action of the torus (𝑐*) on ⋀︀𝑘 𝑐𝑛, in Doklady Akademii Nauk , vol. 348, pp. 155–158, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1996

    1996

  53. [61]

    Gel’fand, M.I

    I.M. Gel’fand, M.I. Graev and V.S. Retakh, Hypergeometric functions on the k th exterior power of the space c^n and the grassmannian g k,n and the connection between them , in Doklady Akademii Nauk , vol. 320, pp. 20–24, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1991

    1991

  54. [62]

    Lee and A.A

    R.N. Lee and A.A. Pomeransky, Critical points and number of master integrals , JHEP 11 (2013) 165 [1308.6676]

    2013 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov and F. Levkovich-Maslyuk,Separation of variables and scalar products at any rank, JHEP 09 (2019) 052 [ 1907.03788]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Gromov, F

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, P. Ryan and D. Volin, Dual Separated Variables and Scalar Products, Phys. Lett. B 806 (2020) 135494 [ 1910.13442]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Maillet, G

    J.M. Maillet, G. Niccoli and L. Vignoli, On Scalar Products in Higher Rank Quantum Separation of Variables, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 086 [ 2003.04281]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Gromov, N

    N. Gromov, N. Primi and P. Ryan, Form-factors and complete basis of observables via separation of variables for higher rank spin chains , JHEP 11 (2022) 039 [ 2202.01591]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov and F. Levkovich-Maslyuk,Separation of variables in AdS/CFT: functional approach for the fishnet CFT , JHEP 06 (2021) 131 [ 2103.15800]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov and F. Levkovich-Maslyuk,Quantum spectral curve and structure constants in 𝒩 = 4 SYM: cusps in the ladder limit , JHEP 10 (2018) 060 [ 1802.04237]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Gelfond and M.A

    O.A. Gelfond and M.A. Vasiliev, Higher Spin Fields in Siegel Space, Currents and Theta Functions , JHEP 03 (2009) 125 [ 0801.2191]

    2009 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Vasiliev, Relativity, causality, locality, quantization and duality in the S(p)(2M) invariant generalized space-time, hep-th/0111119

    M.A. Vasiliev, Relativity, causality, locality, quantization and duality in the S(p)(2M) invariant generalized space-time, hep-th/0111119

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Appell, Fonctions Hyperg´ eom´ etriques et Hypersph´ eriques Polynomes D’Hermite, Gauthier-Villars (1926)

    P. Appell, Fonctions Hyperg´ eom´ etriques et Hypersph´ eriques Polynomes D’Hermite, Gauthier-Villars (1926). – 34 –

    1926

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.