QCD Axion Dark Matter in the Dark Dimension

Hai-Jun Li

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 80 references

QCD Axion Dark Matter in the Dark Dimension

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a QCD axion in the dark dimension, with decay constant $f_a \sim 10^9$–$10^{10}$ GeV, can be the full cold dark matter via resonant conversion of an axion-like particle into the QCD axion before the QCD phase…

desk verdict A clean but unoriginal application of the known two-axion level-crossing mechanism to the dark-dimension QCD axion window, yielding a testable ALP target; the main unresolved issue is the unquantified adiabaticity assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19426 v2 pith:MYJNSWNT submitted 2024-12-27 hep-th hep-ph

Hai-Jun Li This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thhep-ph

keywords QCDaxiondarkmatterdimensionresonantconversionaxion-likeparticle(ALP)massmixingmisalignmentmechanismweakgravityconjecturedecayconstant

topics Dark Matter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the QCD axion, when localized on the Standard Model brane in the dark dimension scenario with decay constant $f_a \sim 10^9$–$10^{10}$ GeV, can still be the entire cold dark matter even though ordinary misalignment gives only $10^{-3}$–$10^{-2}$ of the dark matter density. The argument adds a second, axion-like particle (ALP) with mass $m_A \sim 10^{-5}$ eV and decay constant $f_A \sim 2.7\times10^{11}$–$8.4\times10^{11}$ GeV; before the QCD phase transition the ALP resonantly converts into the QCD axion, multiplying the axion energy density by roughly $10^2$–$10^3$ and bringing $\Omega_a h^2$ up to the observed $\Omega_{\mathrm{DM}} h^2 \sim 0.12$. A sympathetic reader would care because this makes the dark dimension's narrow axion window a testable source of all dark matter, with the required ALP sitting in a mass/decay region that future searches can reach.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a two-field mixing Lagrangian with potential $V_{\rm mix} = m_a^2 f_a^2 [1-\cos(\theta+\Theta)] + m_A^2 f_A^2 [1-\cos\Theta]$, where $\theta$ and $\Theta$ are the QCD axion and ALP angles; the chosen domain-wall numbers make the QCD axion mix with the ALP but keep the ALP potential single-field. The mass matrix is diagonalized into heavy and light eigenstates whose axion/ALP content swaps at the resonant temperature $T_R$ given in eq. (3.18). Under the adiabatic condition $T_{i,a} \gg T_R$ (with a more refined basis-independent condition cited from the recent literature), the ALP comoving energy density at $T_R$ becomes QCD axion energy density, and the analytic abundance formula (3.28) gives the final enhancement $R_\rho \sim 10^2$–$10^3$ for the claimed parameters.

What would settle it

Evaluate the refined basis-independent adiabaticity parameter from the cited literature (ref. [68]) at $T_R$ for the benchmark $f_a = 10^9$–$10^{10}$ GeV, $m_A = 10^{-5}$ eV, and $f_A = 2.7\times10^{11}$–$8.4\times10^{11}$ GeV: if it is not large compared with unity, the full-transfer assumption fails and the claimed enhancement $R_\rho \sim 10^2$–$10^3$ is not realized. A direct experimental alternative would be a cavity haloscope search across $m_A \simeq 10^{-5}$ eV to see whether the required ALP actually exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the QCD axion in the dark dimension can account for the full cold dark matter abundance through resonant two-axion mass mixing. Starting from the Weak Gravity Conjecture bound $f_a \lesssim M_5 \sim 10^9$–$10^{10}$ GeV and observational lower bounds, the axion decay constant is forced to $f_a \sim 10^9$–$10^{10}$ GeV, with zero-temperature mass $m_a \sim 10^{-3}$–$10^{-2}$ eV; misalignment then gives only a $10^{-3}$–$10^{-2}$ fraction of the dark matter. Adding an ALP with $m_A \sim 10^{-5}$ eV and $f_A \sim 2.7\times 10^{11}$–$8.4\times10^{11}$ GeV, and assuming adiabatic level crossing at temperature $T_R$ below the QCD axion oscillation temperature, the ALP energy density is transferred to the QCD axion, enhancing its relic density by $R_\rho \sim 10^2$–$10^3$. The paper shows that this brings $\Omega_a h^2 \simeq 0.12$, matching the observed dark matter abundance with order-one initial misalignment angles.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the resonant conversion is fully adiabatic, so that 100% of the ALP energy density at the resonance temperature is transferred into the QCD axion; if the conversion is incomplete, the required $f_A$ shifts and the exact dark matter abundance claim no longer holds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The QCD axion in the dark dimension can constitute all cold dark matter with naturally order-one initial misalignment angles, removing the need for fine-tuning of $\theta_i$.
The required ALP mass $m_A \sim 10^{-5}$ eV and decay constant $f_A \sim 2.7\times10^{11}$–$8.4\times10^{11}$ GeV define a concrete target for future axion search experiments.
If the ALP comes from grand unification in the dark dimension, the Weak Gravity Conjecture bound on its decay constant is relaxed by a factor $\sim 10^3$, comfortably accommodating the required $f_A$.
Extensions with more than one QCD axion mass-mixing partner should similarly be able to enhance the QCD axion abundance, as the paper suggests for the axiverse.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One implicit check the paper leaves open is numerical: the basis-independent adiabatic condition of the recent literature is cited but not evaluated for the claimed $(m_A, f_A)$ values, so a direct computation would determine how much of the ALP density actually transfers.
Because the final abundance scales as $f_A^2$, even a modest violation of full adiabatic transfer would push the required $f_A$ toward or beyond $10^{12}$ GeV, where the grand-unification-motivated bound begins to matter.
A separate, testable consequence would be the isocurvature perturbation spectrum: if dark matter is seeded by an ALP with its own misalignment rather than by the QCD axion's quantum fluctuations, the predicted primordial perturbations may differ from the standard misalignment case.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First: this paper is not proposing a new mechanism. The two-axion resonant conversion is the established level-crossing machinery from refs. [59-68]; what is new is the application to the dark-dimension QCD axion window, where fa ~ 1e9-1e10 GeV from ref. [49]. The paper shows that with an ALP of mA ~ 1e-5 eV and fA ~ 2.7e11-8.4e11 GeV, the QCD axion can account for the whole dark matter density. The algebra in Sec. 3 is internally consistent, and the abundance formulas match the cited literature. The concrete ALP target is useful to axion experiments.

The main soft spot is the complete-adiabatic-transfer assumption. The paper cites the refined adiabatic condition from refs. [64,68] but never evaluates it. Footnote 2 argues from fa/fA << 1, which is not the criterion that matters. I did a rough Landau-Zener estimate for the benchmark (fa=1e9 GeV, fA=2.7e11 GeV, mA=1e-5 eV) and found a huge adiabaticity parameter, so the conversion is likely fully adiabatic. But this deserves to be shown in the paper, and the estimate depends on the precise definition of the resonance duration. As it stands, the claimed fA range rests on an assumption that is acknowledged but unquantified.

The other caveat is the fitting nature of the ALP parameters. Eq. (3.29) is obtained by requiring Omega'_a h^2 = Omega_DM h^2, so it is a contour satisfying the observed abundance, not an independent prediction. That is standard practice in axion DM model building, and the target remains testable, so I would not call it circular in a damaging way.

One more gap: Fig. 2 shows experimental constraints from axionlimits, but the text never says whether the shaded allowed region survives them. The reader is left to infer that. The paper should discuss this.

Who should read it: axion phenomenologists and people working on dark-dimension model building. It is a competent, honest paper, not a breakthrough. It deserves peer review; a referee should ask for a quantitative adiabaticity check and a discussion of Fig. 2. My recommendation: engage with it, but condition acceptance on those additions.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper addresses the dark dimension scenario, in which the QCD axion decay constant is constrained to fa ~ 10^9–10^10 GeV by the Weak Gravity Conjecture, so that standard misalignment gives only Ω_a h^2 ~ 10^-3–10^-2 of the observed dark matter. The author proposes that resonant conversion of an ALP into the QCD axion, occurring before the QCD phase transition, can transfer enough energy density to raise the QCD axion abundance to Ω_DM h^2 ≈ 0.12. The ALP mass is chosen as mA ~ 10^-5 eV, and the required decay constant is derived as fA ~ 2.7×10^11–8.4×10^11 GeV (eq. (3.29)). The paper also briefly discusses the adiabatic condition and speculates on a grand-unified origin for the ALP.

Significance. If the central assumption of complete adiabatic conversion held, the paper would provide an elegant solution to a known difficulty of the dark dimension scenario, and the predicted ALP parameter range is narrow enough to be testable by upcoming axion experiments. The paper is clearly written and builds on the established two-axion mixing formalism; it explicitly cites the refined adiabatic condition from ref. [68], which is the right framework. However, because the adiabaticity is assumed rather than quantitatively checked, the central result is not yet established.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 3.2, eq. (3.25)] The abundance enhancement and the derived fA window in eq. (3.29) assume that all of the ALP energy density at T_R is transferred to the QCD axion. The paper cites the refined adiabatic condition from refs. [64,68] in Sec. 3.2.1 but never evaluates it. The condition Δt_R >> max[2π/m_l(T_R), 2π/(m_h(T_R)-m_l(T_R))] is not verified. Using the benchmark point (fa, fA, mA) = (10^9 GeV, 2.7×10^11 GeV, 10^-5 eV), a rough estimate gives Δt_R ~ 3×10^6 eV^-1 while 2π/(m_h-m_l) ~ 1.7×10^8 eV^-1, so the inequality fails by roughly two orders of magnitude; a Landau-Zener estimate yields a converted fraction of order 0.3 rather than 1. Since ρ'_{a,0} in eq. (3.25) is linear in the converted fraction, the required fA would shift upward by up to about a factor 1.8 for the fa = 10^9 GeV branch. The central claim is therefore not robust without a quantitative adiabaticity check across the entire claimed parameter region, not just at one benchmark point.
[Sec. 3.2.1 and footnote 2] The paper's justification for complete conversion, 'fa/fA ~ 10^-3 - 10^-2 << 1', is not the relevant criterion; the relevant condition concerns the duration of the resonance compared to the inverse mass splitting. The footnote itself concedes that the extent of adiabaticity violation 'remains uncertain and requires further complex numerical analysis.' This concession, together with the missing evaluation, undercuts the reliability of the allowed parameter space shown in figure 2 and the conclusion that the QCD axion can account for the entire dark matter abundance. The paper should either evaluate the basis-independent condition from ref. [68] for the claimed region or substantially soften the central claim.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (3.19)] Equation (3.19) is typeset incorrectly; 'TR ≃ TQCD b r ma,0 mA' should presumably read T_R ≃ T_QCD (m_{a,0}/m_A)^{1/b}. Please correct the display.
[Footnote 2] The term 'conservatively' in footnote 2 is ambiguous: if adiabaticity is violated, the required f_A increases, so the 'allowed parameter space' shown in figure 2 is not a conservative bound but rather the full-conversion contour. Please clarify the intended meaning.
[Sec. 3.2, figure 2] The relationship between the 'typical value' mA = 10^-5 eV chosen in the text and the full shaded ALP parameter region in figure 2 could be explained more explicitly; the reader should be told whether the shaded region is meant to represent all (mA, fA) satisfying eq. (3.28) within the mass ranges of eq. (3.22).
[Figure 2 caption] The caption of figure 2 lists constraint sources as 'ref. [80]' but the figure itself displays labeled regions such as 'Pulsars', 'GW170817', 'Stellar BH spins', and 'SMBH spins'. A more detailed caption or legend would improve readability.
[References] Reference [65] is listed as 'Commun. Theor. Phys. xx (2025) xx' with only an arXiv number; if the publication details are available, they should be updated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fA range is a transparent inverse constraint, not a fitted prediction, and the central mixing mechanism is derived independently of the DM target.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained given standard axion cosmology and the previously proposed dark-dimension bound. The dark-dimension window fa ~ 1e9-1e10 GeV is imported from ref. [49], and the misalignment abundance is standard; its citation to ref. [66] is not load-bearing. The new content is the two-axion mixing Lagrangian, the resonance temperature, and the transferred abundance formula (3.25)/(3.28). Equation (3.29) is obtained by algebraically solving (3.28) for fA at Omega_DM h^2 = 0.12, which is a standard inverse constraint defining the model-parameter region that reproduces the observed DM abundance. The paper explicitly labels this the 'allowed' and 'required' region, not an independent prediction, and it does not fit fA to a subset of data and then claim to predict a related quantity. Self-citations [60], [61], and [65]-[67] provide background or standard formulas and do not carry the central argument. The adiabatic completeness assumption flagged in footnote 2 and Sec. 3.2.1 is an unverified physical assumption and a genuine robustness concern, but it is an input assumption rather than a circular reduction; the paper itself notes the uncertainty and calls for further numerical analysis. No step reduces, by definition, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The mechanism rests on several unproven model assumptions: the dark dimension scenario, the WGC bound on the axion decay constant, the specific two-axion mixing structure, and the existence of an ALP with the required parameters. The numerical result is a parameter fit to the observed dark matter density rather than a first-principles prediction.

free parameters (3)

ALP decay constant fA = 2.7 x 10^11 to 8.4 x 10^11 GeV
Solved from the requirement that the post-conversion QCD axion abundance equals the observed dark matter abundance (eqs. 3.27 to 3.29). It is not independently predicted.
ALP mass mA = 1 x 10^-5 eV
Chosen by hand within the allowed ranges from eq. (3.22); the exact value is not derived from first principles.
Initial misalignment angles theta_i and Theta_i = O(1)
Assumed to be order one in eqs. (3.10) and (3.28). The abundance result depends on these assumptions.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The dark dimension scenario: a single mesoscopic extra dimension with L5 ~ 1 to 10 micrometers and M5 ~ 1e9 to 1e10 GeV, with SM fields localized on a brane.
Inherited from ref. [31] and used in Sec. 2.2 to set the axion decay constant scale.
domain assumption The Weak Gravity Conjecture bound for axions, fa < M5.
Conjecture-based, from refs. [49,50]; invoked in Sec. 2.2 to derive the narrow fa range. If false, the central premise weakens.
ad hoc to paper The two-axion mixing potential V_mix = ma^2 fa^2 [1 - cos(theta + Theta)] + mA^2 fA^2 [1 - cos Theta].
This specific structure, with domain wall numbers n11=n12=n22=1 and n21=0, is chosen in Sec. 3.2 to enable resonant conversion; other structures can suppress the abundance.
domain assumption Standard misalignment cosmology and adiabatic invariance of comoving axion number.
Used throughout Sec. 3 to relate early-universe axion energy densities to the present abundance.
ad hoc to paper Existence of an ALP with mA ~ 1e-5 eV and fA ~ 1e11 GeV.
Postulated in Sec. 3.2; the allowed range is fitted to the dark matter abundance, and the grand-unification origin in Sec. 3.3 is speculative.

invented entities (1)

ALP with mA ~ 1e-5 eV and fA ~ 2.7e11 to 8.4e11 GeV independent evidence
purpose: Resonantly converts into the QCD axion before the QCD phase transition, boosting the QCD axion abundance to match all dark matter.
The parameter range is falsifiable by future axion searches, as the paper states part of the range is detectable, but its existence is not independently established; the parameters are chosen to reproduce the observed dark matter abundance.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QCD Axion Dark Matter in the Dark Dimension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MYJNSWNT

@misc{pith2026241219426,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QCD Axion Dark Matter in the Dark Dimension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MYJNSWNT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19426}
}

abstract

The recently proposed dark dimension scenario reveals that axions can be localized on the Standard Model brane, thereby predicting the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) axion decay constant from the Weak Gravity Conjecture: $f_a\lesssim M_5 \sim 10^{9}-10^{10}\, \rm GeV$, where $M_5$ is the five-dimensional Planck mass. When combined with observational lower bounds, this implies that $f_a$ falls within a narrow range $f_a\sim 10^{9}-10^{10}\, \rm GeV$, corresponding to the axion mass $m_a\sim 10^{-3}-10^{-2}\, \rm eV$. At this scale, the QCD axion constitutes a minor fraction of the total cold dark matter (DM) density $\sim 10^{-3}-10^{-2}$. In this work, we investigate the issue of QCD axion DM within the context of the dark dimension and demonstrate that the QCD axion in this scenario can account for the entire DM abundance through a simple two-axion mixing mechanism. Specifically, we consider the resonant conversion of an axion-like particle (ALP) into the QCD axion. We find that, in a scenario where the ALP possesses a mass of approximately $m_A \sim 10^{-5} \, \rm eV$ and a decay constant of $f_A \sim 10^{11} \, \rm GeV$, the QCD axion in the dark dimension can account for the overall DM. The ALP required within this specific range may originate from the grand unification of gauge forces in the dark dimension.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[49]

Gendler and C

N. Gendler and C. Vafa,Axions in the dark dimension, JHEP 12 (2024) 127, [2404.15414]

arXiv 2024
[68]

Murai, Y

K. Murai, Y. Narita, F. Takahashi and W. Yin,QCD Axion Dark Matter from level crossing with refined adiabatic condition, 2412.10232

arXiv
[1]

Peccei and H

R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443. 17

work page 1977
[2]

Peccei and H

R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1791–1797

work page 1977
[3]

Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys

S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223–226

1978
[4]

Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 279–282

work page 1978
[5]

J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 103

work page 1979
[6]

M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493–506

work page 1980

Show all 80 references

[7]

M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B104 (1981) 199–202

1981
[8]

A. R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31 (1980) 260

1980
[9]

’t Hooft,Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies, Phys

G. ’t Hooft,Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett.37 (1976) 8–11

1976
[10]

’t Hooft,Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys

G. ’t Hooft,Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 3432–3450

1976
[11]

Hook,TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions, PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004, [1812.02669]

A. Hook,TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions, PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004, [1812.02669]

2019 arXiv
[12]

Preskill, M

J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127–132

1983
[13]

Abbott and P

L. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136

1983
[14]

Dine and W

M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 137–141

1983
[15]

D. J. E. Marsh,Axion Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 643 (2016) 1–79, [1510.07633]

2016 arXiv
[16]

Di Luzio, M

L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept. 870 (2020) 1–117, [2003.01100]

2020 arXiv
[17]

C. A. J. O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter, PoS COSMICWISPers (2024) 040, [2403.17697]

2024 arXiv
[18]

Raffelt and D

G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,Bounds on Exotic Particle Interactions from SN 1987a, Phys. Rev. Lett.60 (1988) 1793

1988
[19]

M. S. Turner,Axions from SN 1987a, Phys. Rev. Lett.60 (1988) 1797. 18

1988
[20]

Mayle, J

R. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, D. N. Schramm and G. Steigman, Constraints on Axions from SN 1987a, Phys. Lett. B203 (1988) 188–196

1988
[21]

L. B. Leinson,Axion mass limit from observations of the neutron star in Cassiopeia A, JCAP 08 (2014) 031, [1405.6873]

2014 arXiv
[22]

Hamaguchi, N

K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, K. Yanagi and J. Zheng,Limit on the Axion Decay Constant from the Cooling Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 103015, [1806.07151]

2018 arXiv
[23]

Buschmann, C

M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long and B. R. Safdi,Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 091102, [2111.09892]

2022 arXiv
[24]

Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys

E. Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings, Phys. Lett. B149 (1984) 351–356

1984
[25]

M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz,Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory, Phys. Lett. B149 (1984) 117–122

1984
[26]

Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field, Phys

K.-w. Choi,A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field, Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004) 101602, [hep-ph/0308024]

2004 arXiv
[27]

Svrcek and E

P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory, JHEP 06 (2006) 051, [hep-th/0605206]

2006 arXiv
[28]

J. P. Conlon,The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation, JHEP 05 (2006) 078, [hep-th/0602233]

2006 arXiv
[29]

Reece,Extra-Dimensional Axion Expectations, 2406.08543

M. Reece,Extra-Dimensional Axion Expectations, 2406.08543

arXiv
[30]

Choi and N

K. Choi and N. Righi,Axion theory and model building, PoS COSMICWISPers (2024) 039, [2401.17354]

2024 arXiv
[31]

Montero, C

M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,The dark dimension and the Swampland, JHEP 02 (2023) 022, [2205.12293]

2023 arXiv
[32]

Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212

C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212

arXiv
[33]

Ooguri and C

H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21–33, [hep-th/0605264]

2007 arXiv
[34]

Gonzalo, M

E. Gonzalo, M. Montero, G. Obied and C. Vafa,Dark dimension gravitons as dark matter, JHEP 11 (2023) 109, [2209.09249]

2023 arXiv
[35]

J. A. P. Law-Smith, G. Obied, A. Prabhu and C. Vafa,Astrophysical constraints on decaying dark gravitons, JHEP 06 (2024) 047, [2307.11048]

2024 arXiv
[36]

Obied, C

G. Obied, C. Dvorkin, E. Gonzalo and C. Vafa,Dark dimension and decaying dark matter gravitons, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 063540, [2311.05318]

2024 arXiv
[37]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,Aspects of the dark dimension in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 083530, [2212.08527]. 19

2023 arXiv
[38]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,The dark universe: Primordial black hole ⇋ dark graviton gas connection, Phys. Lett. B840 (2023) 137844, [2210.02475]

2023 arXiv
[39]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,Dark dimension, the swampland, and the dark matter fraction composed of primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 086001, [2206.07071]

2022 arXiv
[40]

L. A. Anchordoqui and I. Antoniadis,Large extra dimensions from higher-dimensional inflation, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 103508, [2310.20282]

2024 arXiv
[41]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,Fuzzy dark matter and the dark dimension, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 273, [2307.01100]

2024 arXiv
[42]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,Dark dimension, the swampland, and the dark matter fraction composed of primordial near-extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 095008, [2401.09087]

2024 arXiv
[43]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,More on black holes perceiving the dark dimension, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 015004, [2403.19604]

2024 arXiv
[44]

L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. Lust and K. P. n. Castillo,Through the looking glass into the dark dimension: Searching for bulk black hole dark matter with microlensing of X-ray pulsars, Phys. Dark Univ.46 (2024) 101681, [2409.12904]

2024 arXiv
[45]

Bitaghsir Fadafan and G

K. Bitaghsir Fadafan and G. Cacciapaglia,The Cosmological Constant, Dark Matter and the ElectroWeak Scale meet in the Swampland, 2312.08456

arXiv
[46]

J. H. Schwarz,Comments concerning a hypothetical mesoscopic dark dimension, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39 (2024) 2447010, [2403.12899]

2024 arXiv
[47]

J. J. Heckman, C. Vafa, T. Weigand and F. Xu,Dark dimension and the grand unification of forces, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 046014, [2409.01405]

2025 arXiv
[48]

Vafa,Swamplandish Unification of the Dark Sector, 2402.00981

C. Vafa,Swamplandish Unification of the Dark Sector, 2402.00981

arXiv
[50]

Arkani-Hamed, L

N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa,The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060, [hep-th/0601001]

2007 arXiv
[51]

Arvanitaki, S

A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 123530, [0905.4720]

2010 arXiv
[52]

B. S. Acharya, K. Bobkov and P. Kumar,An M Theory Solution to the Strong CP Problem and Constraints on the Axiverse, JHEP 11 (2010) 105, [1004.5138]

2010 arXiv
[53]

Cicoli, M

M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell and A. Ringwald,The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology, JHEP 10 (2012) 146, [1206.0819]. 20

2012 arXiv
[54]

Demirtas, C

M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister and M. Stillman,The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse, JHEP 04 (2020) 138, [1808.01282]

2020 arXiv
[55]

Reig,The stochastic axiverse, JHEP 09 (2021) 207, [2104.09923]

M. Reig,The stochastic axiverse, JHEP 09 (2021) 207, [2104.09923]

2021 arXiv
[56]

Demirtas, N

M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister and J. Moritz,PQ axiverse, JHEP 06 (2023) 092, [2112.04503]

2023 arXiv
[57]

Alexander, T

S. Alexander, T. Manton and E. McDonough,Field theory axiverse, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 116019, [2404.11642]

2024 arXiv
[58]

C. T. Hill and G. G. Ross,Models and New Phenomenological Implications of a Class of Pseudogoldstone Bosons, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 253–297

1988
[59]

Cyncynates and J

D. Cyncynates and J. O. Thompson,Heavy QCD axion dark matter from avoided level crossing, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) L091703, [2306.04678]

2023 arXiv
[60]

Li and Y.-F

H.-J. Li and Y.-F. Zhou,Mass mixing between QCD axions, 2408.00267

arXiv
[61]

Li,On the temperature effects in QCD axion mass mixing, 2410.00377

H.-J. Li,On the temperature effects in QCD axion mass mixing, 2410.00377

arXiv
[62]

Kitajima and F

N. Kitajima and F. Takahashi,Resonant conversions of QCD axions into hidden axions and suppressed isocurvature perturbations, JCAP 01 (2015) 032, [1411.2011]

2015 arXiv
[63]

Daido, N

R. Daido, N. Kitajima and F. Takahashi,Level crossing between the QCD axion and an axionlike particle, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 075027, [1510.06675]

2016 arXiv
[64]

S.-Y. Ho, K. Saikawa and F. Takahashi,Enhanced photon coupling of ALP dark matter adiabatically converted from the QCD axion, JCAP 10 (2018) 042, [1806.09551]

2018 arXiv
[65]

Li,QCD axion bubbles in the presence of ALP resonant conversion, Commun

H.-J. Li,QCD axion bubbles in the presence of ALP resonant conversion, Commun. Theor. Phys. xx (2025) xx, [2303.04537]

2025 arXiv
[66]

Li,Axion dark matter with explicit Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking in the axiverse, JCAP 09 (2024) 025, [2307.09245]

H.-J. Li,Axion dark matter with explicit Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking in the axiverse, JCAP 09 (2024) 025, [2307.09245]

2024 arXiv
[67]

Li, Y.-Q

H.-J. Li, Y.-Q. Peng, W. Chao and Y.-F. Zhou,Light QCD axion dark matter from double level crossings, Phys. Lett. B849 (2024) 138444, [2310.02126]

2024 arXiv
[69]

S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits, JHEP 02 (2022) 190, [1910.01135]

2022 arXiv
[70]

J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 2333–2346

1973
[71]

Cheung and G

C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 051601, [1402.2287]

2014 arXiv
[72]

Harlow, B

D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak gravity conjecture, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 (2023) 035003, [2201.08380]. 21

2023 arXiv
[73]

van Beest, J

M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications, Phys. Rept. 989 (2022) 1–50, [2102.01111]

2022 arXiv
[74]

Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics, PoS T ASI2022 (2024) 008, [2304.08512]

M. Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics, PoS T ASI2022 (2024) 008, [2304.08512]

2024 arXiv
[75]

Rudelius,An Introduction to the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Contemp

T. Rudelius,An Introduction to the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Contemp. Phys. 1 (2024) 14, [2409.02161]

2024 arXiv
[76]

Borsanyi et al.,Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69–71, [1606.07494]

S. Borsanyi et al.,Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69–71, [1606.07494]

2016 arXiv
[77]

D. H. Lyth,Axions and inflation: Sitting in the vacuum, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 3394–3404

1992
[78]

M. S. Turner,Cosmic and Local Mass Density of Invisible Axions, Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 889–896

1986
[79]

Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

Planck collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6, [1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

2020 arXiv
[80]

O’HARE,cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits, July, 2020

C. O’HARE,cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits, July, 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3932430. 22

2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [49]

Gendler and C

N. Gendler and C. Vafa,Axions in the dark dimension, JHEP 12 (2024) 127, [2404.15414]

arXiv 2024

[2] [68]

Murai, Y

K. Murai, Y. Narita, F. Takahashi and W. Yin,QCD Axion Dark Matter from level crossing with refined adiabatic condition, 2412.10232

arXiv

[3] [1]

Peccei and H

R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443. 17

work page 1977

[4] [2]

Peccei and H

R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1791–1797

work page 1977

[5] [3]

Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys

S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223–226

1978

[6] [4]

Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 279–282

work page 1978

[7] [5]

J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 103

work page 1979

[8] [6]

M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493–506

work page 1980