An ab-initio study on engineering quantum anomalous Hall effect in compensated antiferromagnet MnBi$_{2}$Te$_{4}$

Yulei Han; Zeyu Li; Zhenhua Qiao

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 47 references

An ab-initio study on engineering quantum anomalous Hall effect in compensated antiferromagnet MnBi$_{2}$Te$_{4}$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Antiferromagnet film predicted to host quantum anomalous Hall effect

desk verdict The bare-film QAHE result is plausible and internally consistent, but the paper's engineering claim for CrI3 stabilization rests on meV-scale energies and fixed Hubbard U without robustness checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20136 v1 pith:2RBYY7FO submitted 2024-12-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Zeyu Li , Yulei Han , Zhenhua Qiao This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall

keywords quantumanomalousHalleffectMnBi2Te4antiferromagnetictopologicalinsulatorcompensatedantiferromagnetfirst-principlescalculationslayer-resolvedChernnumberhydrostaticpressureCrI3heterostructure

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) — dissipationless chiral edge transport — can occur in a thin film with zero net magnetization, using the layered antiferromagnet MnBi2Te4. The target is a six-septuple-layer film whose magnetic moments cancel globally but whose two outermost Mn layers are aligned parallel, a configuration that breaks the combined parity-time symmetry that normally forces the Berry curvature to vanish. First-principles calculations find a Chern number $C=-1$ and a quantized Hall conductance $-e^2/h$ for four such configurations, with band gaps of 6.5–14.9 meV at ambient pressure. The paper further argues that hydrostatic pressure widens these gaps, reaching 70.8 meV at 3 GPa, and that sandwiching the film between CrI3 layers can stabilize the needed configurations. If correct, this would make a compensated antiferromagnet a practical host for the QAHE without a net magnetic moment.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the magnetic configuration itself: six compensated antiferromagnetic arrangements (m1–m6) of the six-septuple-layer MnBi2Te4 film, defined by which Mn layers have their moments reversed. Configurations m3–m6 break the combined parity-time ($\mathcal{PT}$) symmetry while keeping zero net magnetization, and that symmetry removal is what allows a nonzero Berry curvature and a Chern number. The analysis uses a Wannier-based tight-binding model on the Bi-$p_z$ and Te-$p_z$ orbitals, with a layer-resolved Chern number $C_z(l)$ that shows how the total Chern number is distributed across layers; this resolves why m1/m2 give $C=0$ while m3–m6 give $C=-1$. Pressure enters through the Te–Te quasicovalent bond across the van der Waals gap: compressing the gap strengthens this bond and enlarges the inverted gap. The CrI3 sandwich acts as the stabilizing mechanism that makes the required m3/m4 configurations energetically favorable.

What would settle it

Measure the anomalous Hall conductivity of a six-septuple-layer MnBi2Te4 film prepared with the m3 or m4 magnetic configuration (outer Mn moments parallel) in zero magnetic field. The paper's central claim predicts a quantized plateau at $-e^2/h$ with a topological gap of about 7–15 meV at ambient pressure; observing no plateau, a different quantized value, or a gap much smaller than the calculated one would falsify the claim. A complementary check is to compute the total energies with different Hubbard U values: if m3/m4 cease to be competitive or the band inversion disappears, the prediction's foundation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is that the QAHE does not require ferromagnetism or a net moment: six-septuple-layer MnBi2Te4 with the compensated antiferromagnetic orders labelled m3, m4, m5, and m6 has a topologically nontrivial gap and a quantized anomalous Hall conductivity of $-e^2/h$ (Chern number $C=-1$), even though the total magnetization vanishes and combined parity-time symmetry is absent. The m1 and m2 configurations, by contrast, show zero Hall plateaus. The layer-resolved Chern number shows the difference: in m1/m2 the outermost layers carry opposite Chern numbers that cancel, while in m3–m6 the outer layers contribute with the same sign. Under external hydrostatic pressure the Te–Te quasicovalent bond strengthens as the van der Waals gap compresses, pushing the topological gap above the room-temperature energy scale across a wide pressure range, with the largest computed gap 70.8 meV for m3/m4 at 3 GPa. Finally, a MnBi2Te4 film sandwiched by CrI3 makes the m3 and m4 configurations the most stable magnetic states considered, offering a concrete route to realize them.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction depends on the assumption that the required spin arrangements, which sit about 2.7 meV above the natural ground state, can actually be stabilized in practice (for example by the CrI3 sandwich or by field training) and will remain stable while the Hall signal is measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the prediction holds, a thin film with no net magnetization can host chiral edge channels, so the QAHE would no longer be tied to ferromagnetic order.
Pressure provides a tuning knob: at 3 GPa the topological gap in the m3/m4 configurations reaches 70.8 meV, exceeding the room-temperature energy scale, so high-temperature QAHE becomes plausible in this material.
The layer-resolved Chern number explains how a zero-net-moment film can still have $C=-1$: the outermost layers carry same-sign partial Chern numbers while inner layers cancel.
The CrI3 sandwich renders m3/m4 the lowest-energy configurations among the states considered, giving an experimentally actionable recipe for preparing the QAHE phase.
The m1/m2 configurations, despite also breaking $\mathcal{PT}$ symmetry, show zero Hall plateaus, so not every compensated antiferromagnetic order yields a Chern insulator.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct experimental test would be to prepare a six-septuple-layer MnBi2Te4 device with field training to the m3/m4 states and measure the zero-field Hall conductance; observing the $-e^2/h$ plateau would confirm the prediction, while its absence would point to the metastability problem.
The same layer-resolved Chern number logic should apply to other even-layer antiferromagnetic topological insulator films, so similar compensated configurations may yield QAHE in related MnBi2Te4-family compounds.
The 2.7 meV energy penalty of m3/m4 relative to the A-type ground state means the practical route likely requires interface engineering or field training; the paper does not establish that these states persist during transport measurements.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper's core ab-initio result — six-SL MnBi2Te4 in m3–m6 compensated AFM configurations gives C = -1 with 6–15 meV gaps, while m1/m2 cancel — is a competent, internally consistent computational prediction. The layer-resolved Chern decomposition is genuinely useful; it explains why outermost-layer spin alignment decides the sign. The pressure dependence is also a clean finding: gap up to ~71 meV at 3 GPa, well above room temperature, with topology preserved in the range shown. That part deserves a serious referee.

What's new: the previous model proposal (their own arXiv:2404.13305) is rendered in a realistic material, with systematic DFT+U+SOC, Wannier AHC, six configurations, pressure, and the CrI3 sandwich. The results are not circular: the Chern number comes from Wannier-interpolated AHC, not from the model. The tight-binding model is used only for interpretation.

Soft spots, in order of importance: 1. Realizability of m3/m4 is the load-bearing step. Table I puts them 2.7 meV above A-type AFM — right at the error bar of DFT+U/functionals. The CrI3 stabilization in Fig. 6(c) is total-energy-only within one fixed-U model (U_Mn = 5, U_Cr = 3 eV). No U sweep, no functional check, no AHC for the actual heterostructure. If those configurations aren't reachable, the 'engineering' claim collapses, even though the bare-film band structure could still be right. 2. No convergence or error-bar data: no k-grid or cutoff checks, no comparison of U values, no magnetic anisotropy or vdW method sensitivity. For a prediction paper, that's a standard omission but should be fixed before publication. 3. Pressure is applied by taking bulk relaxed lattice parameters for the film; the film's own relaxation under pressure is not checked. Minor, but worth stating.

I largely agree with the stress-test note. The central conditional result is probably right; the realizability argument is the weak link. This is the kind of paper that should go to peer review — a good referee can ask for the robustness checks without rejecting the core physics. I'd read it again if a revised version includes U-dependence and a heterostructure AHC. Not something I'd cite yet.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses DFT+U with spin-orbit coupling and Wannier-interpolated anomalous Hall conductivity to study six-septuple-layer MnBi2Te4 in six compensated antiferromagnetic configurations (m1-m6). It reports that configurations m3-m6, in which the outermost Mn moments are parallel, give a quantized anomalous Hall conductivity of -e^2/h (Chern number -1), with topological gaps of 6.5-14.9 meV at ambient pressure. The authors find that applying hydrostatic pressure up to 9 GPa enhances these gaps, reaching 70.8 meV at 3 GPa for m3/m4, and they propose a CrI3/MnBi2Te4/CrI3 heterostructure to stabilize the m3 and m4 configurations. A tight-binding layer-resolved Chern number analysis is used to explain the distribution of the Chern number across the multilayer. The central conditional claim is that QAHE can occur in a compensated antiferromagnet without PT symmetry, and the paper also claims to provide a feasible route to realize the required magnetic configurations.

Significance. If the central result holds, the paper makes an interesting prediction: a thin-film compensated antiferromagnet can host a quantized anomalous Hall effect without a net magnetization, extending the search for QAHE beyond ferromagnetic and uncompensated systems. The numerical evidence for the fixed magnetic configurations is direct and reproducible in principle: the Wannier-interpolated AHC shows quantized plateaus, and the pressure dependence is a concrete, falsifiable prediction. The paper also provides a useful layer-resolved Chern number interpretation. However, the significance of the proposed 'engineering' route is currently limited because the stabilization of the m3/m4 configurations rests on total-energy differences of order 2.7 meV within a single DFT+U+vdW model, without robustness checks or a transport calculation for the actual heterostructure. Thus the paper is valuable as a conditional prediction, but the realizability claim needs stronger support.

major comments (2)

[IV. COUPLING TO THE MAGNETIC SUBSTRATE] The abstract and Section V claim that the CrI3/MnBi2Te4/CrI3 heterostructure provides a 'reliable strategy' for realizing the QAHE-supporting configurations. This claim rests on the total-energy comparisons in Fig. 6(c) and Table I. In the bare film, m3 and m4 lie only 2.7 meV above the A-type AFM ground state, which is at the scale of typical DFT+U and functional errors. The paper does not test the sensitivity of this energy ordering to the Hubbard U values (fixed at U_Mn=5 eV and U_Cr=3 eV), to the exchange-correlation functional, or to the van der Waals treatment, nor does it compute the anomalous Hall conductivity of the full CrI3/MnBi2Te4/CrI3 heterostructure to verify that the topological gap survives the interface. Without these checks, the realizability step is not established, and the engineering claim is conditional on parameter choices.
[III. THE EFFECT OF PRESSURE] The pressure-dependent gap enhancement is computed by taking the bulk MnBi2Te4 lattice parameters under pressure and applying them to the six-SL film. The paper does not address whether the relative energies of the magnetic configurations m3-m6 with respect to the A-type AFM state change under pressure, nor whether the magnetic order itself remains stable at the compressed lattice. Since the abstract states that the nontrivial gap can exceed the room-temperature energy scale 'in a wide range of pressures,' the quantitative pressure claim needs at least a statement about the stability of the magnetic configurations under the same compression.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] The section numbering is inconsistent: two sections are labelled 'III' (Layer-Resolved Chern Number and The Effect of Pressure), and the subsequent sections are not renumbered accordingly.
[III. STRUCTURAL AND ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES] The text refers to 'Figure. 1(c)' for the six compensated antiferromagnetic configurations, but Figure 1 contains only panels (a) and (b); the six configurations appear to be shown in the schematic in Fig. 1(b), so the cross-reference should be corrected.
[II. CALCULATION METHODS] Equation (1) uses the three-dimensional integration measure dk/(2π)^3, although the system is a thin film with a two-dimensional Brillouin zone; the notation should be clarified to avoid confusion about the dimensionality of the integral.
[III. STRUCTURAL AND ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES] The anomalous Hall conductivity plateaus in Figs. 3(a)-(f) are presented without specifying the k-mesh density used for the Wannier interpolation or providing a convergence test; a brief statement of the k-mesh and the width of the plateau would strengthen the numerical claim of quantization.
[III. LAYER-RESOLVED CHERN NUMBER] The tight-binding model used for the layer-resolved Chern number is based on parameters from refs. [42,43] and the authors' own unpublished preprint [31], but the paper does not describe how the DFT Wannier bands are mapped onto this model; the layer-resolved numbers should be regarded as an interpretive tool rather than an independent determination of the Chern number.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QAHE claim for m3-m6 rests on independent DFT+Wannier AHC calculations, and the sole self-citation is motivational rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central result (C = -1 for configurations m3-m6) is obtained from the Wannier-interpolated anomalous Hall conductivity, Eq. (1), computed from DFT+U band structures; no Chern number is used as an input or fit, so the quantization is a genuine first-principles output. The layer-resolved Chern number model (Sec. III) is explicitly an interpretive decomposition, cited to refs [42,43], and is not used to generate the quantized plateaus of Fig. 3. The pressure dependence and the CrI3 heterostructure energetics are independent DFT total-energy/band-structure calculations. The only self-citation is ref [31] (arXiv:2404.13305) in the abstract and introduction, which motivates the study ("According to the model calculations of our earlier work [31]...") but is not load-bearing: the present paper's QAHE claim stands on its own DFT+Wannier calculation. The realizability of m3/m4 is a robustness concern about DFT+U parameters, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The numerical claims rest on DFT calculations with two Hubbard parameters taken from the literature. The main non-standard assumptions are the realizability of metastable magnetic configurations and the use of bulk-derived compressed lattice parameters for films. No new physical entities such as particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)

Hubbard U for Mn 3d electrons = 5.00 eV
GGA+U onsite repulsion taken from ref [35], not fitted to the target result. It directly controls Mn moments and magnetic exchange gaps.
Hubbard U for Cr 3d electrons = 3.00 eV
Used for CrI3 in the heterostructure, taken from ref [35]. Affects interfacial energetics and magnetic coupling.

assumptions (5)

standard math The Berry curvature formula in Eq. (1) and Wannier interpolation give an accurate anomalous Hall conductivity for the DFT Hamiltonian.
Standard linear-response expression used without proof in Sec. II.
domain assumption The magnetic configurations m3-m6 can be realized in six-septuple-layer films or via CrI3 coupling.
Table I shows m3/m4 are 2.7 meV above the A-type ground state, and Sec. IV argues CrI3 makes them favorable. No dynamic stability or experimental realization is shown.
domain assumption Bulk MnBi2Te4 structural parameters under pressure are representative of the six-septuple-layer film under the same pressure.
Sec. II states: 'The corresponding structural parameters of bulk MnBi2Te4 are applied to four- and six-septuple-layer MnBi2Te4.' Surface relaxation and film-specific strain are not separately treated.
domain assumption GGA+U with U=5 eV for Mn and U=3 eV for Cr, plus DFT-D3, adequately describes the correlated electronic structure and interlayer bonding.
Standard but approximate treatment; U values are from prior literature rather than determined self-consistently for this system.
domain assumption The tight-binding model built on pz orbitals in Sec. III faithfully represents the low-energy physics used for layer-resolved Chern numbers.
Model taken from refs [42,43]; it is used without a direct benchmark against the full DFT wavefunctions beyond reproducing band features.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An ab-initio study on engineering quantum anomalous Hall effect in compensated antiferromagnet MnBi$_{2}$Te$_{4}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RBYY7FO

@misc{pith2026241220136,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An ab-initio study on engineering quantum anomalous Hall effect in compensated antiferromagnet MnBi$_2$Te$_4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RBYY7FO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20136}
}

abstract

Recently, the quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) has been theoretically proposed in compensated antiferromagnetic systems by using the magnetic topological insulator model [see arXiv:2404.13305 (2024)]. However, the related and systematic study based on a realistic material system is still limited. As the only experimentally realized antiferromagnetic topological insulator, MnBi$_{2}$Te$_{4}$ becomes a vital platform for exploring various topological states. In this work, by using the comprehensive first-principles calculations, we demonstrate that the QAHE can also be realized in compensated antiferromagnetic even-septuple-layer MnBi$_{2}$Te$_{4}$ without combined parity-time ($\mathcal{PT}$) symmetry. Using a magnetic topological insulator model, the layer-resolved Chern number is calculated to further understand the physical origin of different Chern numbers. The application of external hydrostatic pressure can strengthen the Te-Te quasicovalent bond due to the dramatic compression of the van der Waals gap. Thus, the resulting topological nontrivial gap can exceed the room-temperature energy scale in a wide range of pressures. Additionally, we find that constructing MnBi$_{2}$Te$_{4}$/CrI$_{3}$ heterostructure can realize the compensated antiferromagnetic configurations with QAHE. Our findings illustrate the realization of QAHE in compensated antiferromagnetic even-septuple-layer MnBi$_{2}$Te$_{4}$ and provide a reliable strategy to obtain the corresponding magnetic configurations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20136 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (a)-(f) The band structures of six-septuple-layer M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (a)-(f) The anomalous Hall conductivity of m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The evolution of calculated in-plane and out-of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

[1]

F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Eﬀect with- out Landau Levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

work page 1988
[2]

Shen, Half quantized Hall eﬀect, Coshare Science 02, 01 (2024)

S.Q. Shen, Half quantized Hall eﬀect, Coshare Science 02, 01 (2024)

work page 2024
[3]

R. Yu, W. Zhang, H. J. Zhang, S. C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized Anomalous Hall Eﬀect in Magnetic Topological Insulators, Science 329, 61 (2010)

work page 2010
[4]

Chang, J

C.-Z. Chang, J. S. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. C. Zhang, M.Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. H. Ji, X. Chen, J. F. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.- C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Eﬀect in a Magnetic Topological Insula- tor, Science 340, 167 (2013)

work page 2013
[5]

Z. Qiao, S. A. Yang, W.-X. Feng, W.-K. Tse, J. Ding, Y. G. Yao, J. Wang, and Q. Niu, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in graphene from Rashba and exchange eﬀects, Phys. Rev. B 82, 161414(R) (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

Liu, Two-dimensional topological insulators: past, present and future, Coshare Science 01, 03 (2023)

F. Liu, Two-dimensional topological insulators: past, present and future, Coshare Science 01, 03 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

Serlin, C

M. Serlin, C. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall eﬀect in a moir´ e het- erostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. De- vakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect from inter- twined moir´ e bands, Nature (London) 600, 641 (2021)

work page 2021

Show all 47 references

[9]

T. Han, Z. Lu, Y. Yao, J. Yang, J. Seo, C. Yoon, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, F. Zhang, and L. Ju, Large quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in spin-orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene, Science 384, 647 (2024)

2024
[10]

Z. Li, Y. Han, and Z. Qiao, Chern number tunable quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in monolayer transitional metal oxides via manipulating magnetization orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 036801 (2022)

2022
[11]

A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters ﬁlling in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 365, 605 (2019)

2019
[12]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic Spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[13]

ˇSmejkal, A.H

L. ˇSmejkal, A.H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022)

2022
[14]

Y. Liu, J. Li and Q. Liu, Chern-Insulator Phase in Anti- ferromagnets, Nano Lett. 23, 8650 (2023)

2023
[15]

Guo, Z.-X

P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in collinear antiferromagnetism, Npj Comput. Mater. 9, 70 (2023)

2023
[16]

Wu, Y.-L

B. Wu, Y.-L. Song, W.-X. Ji, P.-J. Wang, S.-F. Zhang, and C.-W. Zhang, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in an antiferromagnetic monolayer of MoO, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214419 (2023)

2023
[17]

M. M. Otrokov, I. I. Klimovskikh, H. Bentmann, D. Es- tyunin, A. Zeugner, Z. S. Aliev, S. Gaß, A. Wolter, A. Koroleva, and A. M. Shikin et al., Prediction and ob- servation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nature (London) 576, 416 (2019)

2019
[18]

Y. Gong, J. W. Guo, J. H. Li, K. J. Zhu, M. H. Liao, X. Z. Liu, Q. H. Zhang, L. Gu, L. Tang, and X. Feng, Experimental realization of an intrinsic magnetic topo- logical insulator, Chin. Phys. Lett. 36, 076801 (2019)

2019
[19]

Zhang, M

D. Zhang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, D. Xing, H. Zhang, and J. Wang, Topological axion states in the magnetic insula- tor MnBi 2Te4 with the quantized magnetoelectric eﬀect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 206401 (2019)

2019
[20]

J. Li, Y. Li, S. Du, Z. Wang, B.-L. Gu, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, Intrinsic magnetic topologi- cal insulators in van der Waals layered MnBi 2Te4-family materials, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5685 (2019)

2019
[21]

M. M. Otrokov, I. P. Rusinov, M. Blanco-Rey, M. Hoﬀ- mann, A. Y. Vyazovskaya, S. V. Eremeev, A. Ernst, P. M. Echenique, A. Arnau, and E. V. Chulkov, Unique Thickness-Dependent Properties of the van der Waals Interlayer Antiferromagnet MnBi 2Te4 Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 107...

2019
[22]

S. Yang, X. Xu, Y. Zhu, R. Niu, C. Xu, Y. Peng, X. Cheng, X. Jia, Y. Huang, X. Xu, J. Lu, and Y. Ye, Odd- Even Layer-Number Eﬀect and Layer-Dependent Mag- netic Phase Diagrams in MnBi 2Te4, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011003 (2021)

2021
[23]

Gao, Y.-F

A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, C. Hu, J.-X. Qiu, C. Tzschaschel, B. Ghosh, S.-C. Ho, D. B´ erub´ e, R. Chen, and H. Sun et al., Layer Hall eﬀect in a 2D topological axion antiferromag- net, Nature (London) 595, 521 (2021)

2021
[25]

Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4, Science 367, 895 (2020)

2020
[26]

Fu, C.-X

H. Fu, C.-X. Liu, and B. Yan, Exchange bias and quan- tum anomalous Hall eﬀect in the MnBi 2Te4/CrI3 het- erostructure, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz0948 (2020)

2020
[27]

Z. Ying, B. Chen, C. Li, B. Wei, Z. Dai, F. Guo, D. Pan, H. Zhang, D. Wu, X. Wang, S. Zhang, F. Fei, and F. Song, Large Exchange Bias Eﬀect and Coverage- Dependent Interfacial Coupling in CrI 3/MnBi2Te4 van der Waals Heterostructures, Nano Lett. 23, 765 (2023)

2023
[28]

S. K. Chong, Y. Cheng, H. Man, S. H. Lee, Y. Wang, B. Dai, M. Tanabe, T.-H. Yang, Z. Mao, and K. A. Moler et al., Intrinsic exchange biased anomalous Hall eﬀect in an uncompensated antiferromagnet MnBi 2Te4, Nat. Commun. 15, 2881 (2024)

2024
[29]

B. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-H. Li, H. Tay, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. H. W. Chan, J. Yan, F. Song, R. Cheng, and C.-Z. Chang, Even-odd layer-dependent exchange bias eﬀect in MnBi 2Te4 Chern insulator devices, Nano Lett. 24, 8320 (2024)

2024
[30]

C. Lei, T. V. Trevisan, O. Heinonen, R. J. McQueeney, and A. H. MacDonald, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in perfectly compensated collinear antiferromagnetic thi n ﬁlms, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195433 (2022). 7

2022
[31]

Liang, Z

W. Liang, Z. Li, J. An, Y. Ren, Z. Qiao and Q. Niu, Chern Number Tunable Quantum Anomalous Hall Eﬀect in Compensated Antiferromagnets, arXiv:2404.13305

arXiv
[32]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Eﬃcient iterative schem es for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

1996
[33]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

1996
[34]

H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

1976
[35]

L. Wang, T. Maxisch, and G. Ceder, Oxidation energies of transition metal oxides within the GGA+U framework, Phys. Rev. B 73, 195107 (2006)

2006
[36]

A. A. Mostoﬁ, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, A tool for obtaining maximally- localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

2008
[37]

X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Ab initio calculation of the anomalous Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 74, 195118 (2006)

2006
[38]

Fan, C.-H

X. Fan, C.-H. Chang, W. T. Zheng, J.-L. Kuo, and D. J. Singh, The Electronic Properties of Single-Layer and Multilayer MoS2 under High Pressure, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 10189 (2015)

2015
[39]

S. Du, P. Tang, J. Li, Z. Lin, Y. Xu, W. Duan, and A. Rubio, Berry curvature engineering by gating two-dimensional antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022025(R) (2020)

2020
[40]

Y. Ren, S. Ke, W.-K. Lou, and K. Chang, Quantum phase transitions driven by sliding in bilayer MnBi 2Te4, Phys. Rev. B 106, 235302 (2022)

2022
[41]

Niu, X.-L

Z. Niu, X.-L. Yu, D. Shao, X. Jing, D. Hou, X. Li, J. Sun, J. Shi, X. Fan, and T. Cao, Interlayer ferroelectric po- larization modulated anomalous Hall eﬀect in four-layer MnBi2Te4 antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174405 (2024)

2024
[42]

Jiang, Z

H. Jiang, Z. Qiao, H. Liu, and Q. Niu, Quantum anoma- lous Hall eﬀect with tunable Chern number in mag- netic topological insulator ﬁlm, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045445 (2012)

2012
[43]

Liang, T

W. Liang, T. Hou, J. Zeng, Z. Liu, Y. Han, and Z. Qiao, Layer-dependent zero-line modes in antiferromag- netic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075303 (2023)

2023
[44]

Varnava and D

N. Varnava and D. Vanderbilt, Surfaces of axion insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245117 (2018)

2018
[45]

P. Deng, Y. Han, P. Zhang, S. K. Chong, Z. Qiao, and K. L. Wang, Tuning the number of chiral edge channels in a ﬁxed quantum anomalous Hall system, Phys. Rev. B 109, L201402 (2024)

2024
[46]

R. Peng, Y. Ma, H. Wang, B. Huang, and Y. Dai, Stacking-dependent topological phase in bilayer MBi2Te4(M = Ge, Sn, Pb), Phys. Rev. B 101, 115427 (2020)

2020
[47]

X. Wang, Z. Li, M. Zhang, T. Hou, J. Zhao, L. Li, A. Rahman, Z. Xu, J. Gong, Z. Chi, R. Dai, Z. Wang, Z. Qiao, and Z. Zhang, Pressure-induced modiﬁcation of the anomalous Hall eﬀect in layered Fe 3GeTe2, Phys. Rev. B 100, 014407 (2019)

2019
[48]

F. Yu, X. Zhu, X. Wen, Z. Gui, Z. Li, Y. Han, T. Wu, Z. Wang, Z. Xiang, Z. Qiao, J. Ying, and X. Chen, Pressure- induced dimensional crossover in a kagome superconduc- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 077001 (2022)

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Eﬀect with- out Landau Levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

work page 1988

[2] [2]

Shen, Half quantized Hall eﬀect, Coshare Science 02, 01 (2024)

S.Q. Shen, Half quantized Hall eﬀect, Coshare Science 02, 01 (2024)

work page 2024

[3] [3]

R. Yu, W. Zhang, H. J. Zhang, S. C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized Anomalous Hall Eﬀect in Magnetic Topological Insulators, Science 329, 61 (2010)

work page 2010

[4] [4]

Chang, J

C.-Z. Chang, J. S. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. C. Zhang, M.Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. H. Ji, X. Chen, J. F. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.- C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Eﬀect in a Magnetic Topological Insula- tor, Science 340, 167 (2013)

work page 2013

[5] [5]

Z. Qiao, S. A. Yang, W.-X. Feng, W.-K. Tse, J. Ding, Y. G. Yao, J. Wang, and Q. Niu, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in graphene from Rashba and exchange eﬀects, Phys. Rev. B 82, 161414(R) (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Liu, Two-dimensional topological insulators: past, present and future, Coshare Science 01, 03 (2023)

F. Liu, Two-dimensional topological insulators: past, present and future, Coshare Science 01, 03 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [7]

Serlin, C

M. Serlin, C. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall eﬀect in a moir´ e het- erostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. De- vakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect from inter- twined moir´ e bands, Nature (London) 600, 641 (2021)

work page 2021