Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

The Two-Loop Lipatov Vertex in QCD

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper determines the two-loop QCD Reggeon-gluon-Reggeon (Lipatov) vertex in dimensional regularization through finite terms, extracted from the odd-odd colour component of 2→3 amplitudes in multi-Regge kinematics after subtracting…

desk verdict Serious two-loop computation: the Lipatov vertex is almost certainly right as an SR/MR matching coefficient, but the pole/cut-scheme interpretation rests on a conjecture that two-loop data cannot test. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20578 v1 pith:62GEE23E submitted 2024-12-29 hep-ph hep-th

Samuel Abreu , Giuseppe De Laurentis , Giulio Falcioni , Einan Gardi , Calum Milloy , Leonardo Vernazza This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords Lipatovvertexmulti-ReggekinematicsReggepoleandcuttwo-loopQCDamplitudesshock-waveformalismsingle-valuedpolylogarithmsBFKLN=4superYang-Mills
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper determines the two-loop Reggeon-gluon-Reggeon (Lipatov) vertex of QCD, the effective vertex for emitting a real gluon from a Reggeized gluon, in dimensional regularization through finite terms. It does so by computing the two-loop gg→ggg, gq→ggq, and qq→qgq amplitudes in multi-Regge kinematics from known general-kinematics amplitudes, and matching them against a multi-Reggeon effective-theory computation. The matching requires separating the factorizing Regge-pole part from the non-planar Regge cut; with that separation, the vertex follows from any of the three channels and its maximal-transcendental-weight part agrees with the N=4 super Yang-Mills vertex. The one-loop vertex is also obtained through O($ε^{4}$). These results complete the ingredients for next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic Regge-factorization predictions in 2→3 scattering.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Reggeon field W, obtained by expanding infinite lightlike Wilson lines in the shock-wave formalism: a single W carries octet colour and odd signature and represents one Reggeon, while products of W's represent multi-Reggeon states. Rapidity evolution is generated by the Balitsky-JIMWLK Hamiltonian, and real gluon emission is described by vertices W→W+g, W→WW+g, WW→WW+g, W→WWW+g, and so on. The pole/cut criterion, eq. (8.3), assigns the single-Reggeon transition plus the planar part of multi-Reggeon transitions to the Regge pole and the non-planar remainder to the Regge cut; the extraction uses the universality of the planar part across the three partonic channels to make the definition of the vertex unambiguous.

What would settle it

Compute the three-loop planar multi-Reggeon contribution to the octet-octet component of a 2→3 amplitude at NNLL accuracy and compare it with the prediction in eq. (8.19); any deviation would show that planar multi-Reggeon exchanges mix into the Regge cut, invalidating the pole/cut extraction of the two-loop vertex.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is the two-loop Lipatov vertex v(2)(t1,t2,|p4|2) in the pole/cut scheme, given in eqs. (8.36)–(8.42) for its dispersive and absorptive parts. It is extracted by matching the odd-odd, octet-octet components of the gg→ggg, gq→ggq, and qq→qgq amplitudes at two loops in multi-Regge kinematics to the factorization formula after subtracting the multi-Reggeon (cut) contribution, which is computed from the shock-wave formalism. The maximal-weight contribution matches the N=4 super Yang-Mills vertex, eqs. (8.22)–(8.23); the lower-weight pieces involving Nc and nf are the genuinely new QCD terms. The paper also provides the one-loop vertex through O($ε^{4}$).

Load-bearing premise

The extraction assumes that the Regge pole is exactly the sum of the single-Reggeon exchange and the planar part of multi-Reggeon exchanges, with the Regge cut entirely non-planar; this pole/cut rule is tested for 2→2 scattering through four loops but is only conjectured for 2→3 scattering at NNLL accuracy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two-loop Lipatov vertex completes the Regge-pole sector for 2→3 scattering at NNLL accuracy: together with the three-loop gluon Regge trajectory and two-loop impact factors, the factorizing part of the amplitude is now fully determined.
  • The result provides a key ingredient for an NNLO BFKL kernel, since that kernel requires the interference of two-loop and one-loop Lipatov vertices together with multi-particle central emission.
  • Agreement among gg→ggg, gq→ggq, and qq→qgq channels is an internal consistency check of the extraction, and agreement of the maximal-weight part with the N=4 super Yang-Mills vertex checks the transcendental structure.
  • The one-loop vertex through O(ε^4), with its spurious soft poles cancelled by transcendental functions, is now available for future three-loop 2→3 computations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proposed three-loop planar multi-Reggeon prediction, eq. (8.19), is a sharp test of the pole/cut conjecture: an explicit computation there would settle whether the extracted two-loop vertex is genuinely the factorized Lipatov vertex or an admixture of pole and cut.
  • The same effective-theory setup should extend to 2→4 amplitudes in multi-Regge kinematics, where planar Regge cuts first appear; in the planar limit this could connect the Reggeon description to the remainder functions of super Yang-Mills theory.
  • The manifestly finite soft limit and the cancellation of spurious rational poles are structural properties any higher-loop extension of the vertex will have to reproduce, so they can serve as a practical constraint in future computations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper determines the two-loop Reggeon-gluon-Reggeon (Lipatov) vertex of QCD by matching 2→3 scattering amplitudes in multi-Regge kinematics (MRK) to a multi-Reggeon effective-theory computation. Three building blocks are combined. First, the non-planar two-loop QCD amplitudes for gg→ggg, gq→ggq and qq→qgq are expanded around the MRK limit using the differential-equation method for pentagon functions together with p-adic reconstruction of the rational coefficients. Second, the shock-wave based multi-Reggeon framework is extended to 2→3 processes; the relevant two-loop transitions in the odd-odd signature sector (R3gR3, RgR3 and R3gR) are computed explicitly, alongside all one-loop transitions. Third, the Regge-pole factorization formula, with impact factors and Regge trajectory taken from earlier 2→2 determinations, is used to extract the vertex. The matching first gives the vertex in the single-Reggeon (SR/MR) scheme and then, through eq. (8.13), in the pole/cut scheme defined by criterion (8.3) of refs. [23,24]. The final result, eqs. (8.36)–(8.42), is expressed in a compact basis of single-valued polylogarithms with manifest target-projectile symmetry and soft-limit finiteness; the one-loop vertex is given through O(ε⁴). Extensive checks are reported: numerical verification of the MRK expansions at x=10⁻¹⁰, agreement of the one-loop vertex with the known soft limit and with ref.

Significance. If correct, this is the first complete two-loop QCD Lipatov vertex, closing the last missing Regge-pole ingredient (beyond impact factors and trajectory) needed for NNLL predictions from MRK factorization in 2→3 scattering, and it constitutes a key building block for the NNLO BFKL kernel. The technical achievement is substantial: the MRK expansion of two-loop five-point amplitudes, the extension of the multi-Reggeon effective theory to real-gluon emission, and the construction of a manifestly finite, symmetry-adapted function basis. The paper ships analytic expressions in ancillary files and, notably, makes a concrete falsifiable three-loop prediction, eq. (8.19). The main caveat — correctly identified by the authors — is that the identification of the extracted coefficient with the factorized Regge-pole vertex relies on the conjectural pole/cut criterion (8.3) for 2→3; as discussed in the major comments, the weight-4 component of the result is robust against this caveat, while the lower-weight components are scheme-dependent within a one-parameter family. Even under this caveat, the result is a well-defined and important matching coefficient.

major comments (2)
  1. [§8.1, eqs. (8.3), (8.9)–(8.13), (7.94)–(7.100)] The pole/cut criterion (8.3) is conjectural for 2→3, and no quantity determined in this paper tests it. The extraction of v^{SR(2)} in eq. (8.9) is well defined, but the conversion in eq. (8.13) encodes the assumption that all planar multi-Reggeon (MR) contributions belong to the Regge pole. The planar MR contribution is N_c² F_fact, eq. (7.100). In the qq and qg channels its coefficient in the MR amplitude, eqs. (7.94)–(7.95), cancels exactly against the conversion term in eq. (8.13); in the gg channel the residual coefficient is 36, eq. (7.96), so that channel only verifies the internal consistency of the MR computation against the qq/qg channels. Reassigning any fraction of the planar MR between pole and cut shifts v^{(2)} by a universal function — a multiple of the bracket in eq. (8.13) — which preserves all of the stated checks: the three-channel agreement (the shift is process-independent), the maximal-weight sYM match (the shift has weight at most 2 in the finite part), and soft-limit finiteness (the shift is built from the same finite function basis). Hence eqs. (8.36)–(8.42) are guaranteed to be the pole/cut matching coefficient; they are the Regge-pole Lipatov vertex only if (8.3) holds for 2→3. The manuscript should state this residual ambiguity explicitly and quantify it: a reassignment of the planar MR shifts v^{(2)} by a universal function of transcendental weight ≤ 2 (plus the associated 1/ε² and 1/ε terms), so that the weight-4 part is scheme-robust while the lower-weight QCD-specific parts, including all n_f-dependent terms, are conditional on (8.3).
  2. [Abstract; §8.1 after eq. (7.100); §9] The framing of the evidence for criterion (8.3) overstates its logical force. Section 8.1 presents the universality of the planar MR contributions, eq. (7.100), as a “test” of the pole/cut criterion; universality is necessary for the planar MR to be absorbed into a universal pole, but it does not exclude a universal cut component, so it is not a test of the pole/cut identification. The first genuinely discriminating test is the three-loop planar-MR prediction, eq. (8.19), which the authors themselves propose; this is a strength and should be presented as such, but the distinction between a necessary-condition check and a falsifiable test should be drawn explicitly. The abstract's unqualified claim to “determine the QCD Lipatov vertex” should be qualified in the abstract and introduction: the result determines the vertex in the pole/cut scheme defined by (8.3), whose conjectural status for 2→3 (in contrast with the four-loop tests available for 2→2) should be stated up front. The conclusions should also note that the advertised application, the NNLO BFKL kernel, inherits this conditionality for all components except the weight-4 one.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5, eq. (5.4)] The one-loop extraction uses only the gg→ggg channel, and no MR subtraction is performed. This is valid because the one-loop R2gR2 transition, eq. (7.18), is carried by T(−−), whose action on the gg tree-level colour structure c[8a,8a] has no [8a,8a] component, eq. (7.26), in contrast with the qq case, eq. (7.23). Spell this out where eq. (5.4) is introduced, since a reader comparing with eqs. (7.94)–(7.96) might otherwise wonder why the two-loop extraction needs MR subtraction while the one-loop one does not.
  2. [§4.1, eq. (4.10)] The statement that odd-signature factorization holds through next-to-leading logarithms should be qualified with respect to the SR/MR scheme introduced in §6: in that scheme the one-loop R2gR2 transition already contributes to the qq odd-odd octet channel, eqs. (7.18) and (7.23), so the factorization statement holds for the physical amplitude, with the SR/MR split understood as a bookkeeping convention.
  3. [§8.2.3, eqs. (8.36a)–(8.42)] The rational prefactors in the vertex contain denominators vanishing at q ≡ z − z̄ = 0 as well as at p ≡ 1 − z − z̄ = 0. The paper establishes finiteness in the soft limit p → 0 explicitly, but the regularity at q = 0 (the tr5 → 0 line of Fig. 2) should be stated and, ideally, shown to follow from the same kind of cancellation between the φ_i and μ_j terms.
  4. [§9 and §5] The comparison with the literature for the one-loop vertex is quoted through O(ε²), ref. [62], while the paper presents v^{(1)} through O(ε⁴); state explicitly which orders are new and why the literature comparison stops at O(ε²).
  5. [General typesetting] Please remove the “bracehtip” artifacts in eqs. (8.3) and (B.14), and repair the garbled colour indices in eqs. (7.4)–(7.5) and (7.58); these appear to be conversion artifacts and currently obstruct the reading of those equations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: matching-based extraction; pole/cut criterion is a flagged conjecture, not a self-referential input.

full rationale

The two-loop Lipatov vertex is not obtained by fitting a target function or by renaming an input. Section 3 computes the full 2→3 QCD amplitudes in MRK from the independent general-kinematics amplitudes of refs. [63–68]; sections 6–7 compute the multi-Reggeon (MR) contributions from the shock-wave effective theory; eq. (8.9) then determines v^{SR(2)} by subtracting the MR part from the full amplitude, with all other ingredients (tree amplitude, one-loop vertex, impact factors and trajectory) known. The impact factors and trajectory are taken from refs. [23,24], but those are fixed by 2→2 scattering data and cross-checked against refs. [50–52]; they are not functions of the 2→3 vertex being extracted. The conversion to the pole/cut scheme, eq. (8.13), depends on the criterion (8.3) that the Regge pole is the SR exchange plus the planar part of MR exchange and the cut is entirely non-planar. For 2→3 this is a conjecture, as the authors acknowledge: in §8.1 they say 'a criterion has been proposed in [23,24]' and in the conclusions they propose a three-loop planar MR prediction, eq. (8.19), 'to provide further assurance'. If planar MR were to mix into the cut, eqs. (8.36)–(8.42) would still be the well-defined SR/MR matching coefficient, but would not be the factorized Regge-pole vertex. That is a physical-scheme assumption, not a circular equation. The maximal-weight agreement with the N=4 sYM vertex and the equality of the three partonic channels are genuine independent checks. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted input or to the claimed result; the self-citations are backed by independent 2→2 computations and external comparisons, so they do not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on the multi-Reggeon effective theory (Reggeon field W, Balitsky-JIMWLK evolution) developed in prior work by overlapping author groups, on known two-loop 2 to 3 amplitudes, and on the pole/cut criterion of refs [23,24]. No free parameters are fitted: the only numerical inputs are high-precision boundary values computed from the differential equations, used to reconstruct analytic constants. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The logarithm W of the shock-wave Wilson line U is identified with the Reggeon field; products of W fields represent multi-Reggeon exchanges.
    Section 6.1, eqs (6.5)-(6.6). This identification, established in refs [17-26], is the basis of all multi-Reggeon computations in sections 7 and 8; the paper extends it to 2 to 3 processes but does not re-derive its validity.
  • domain assumption Rapidity evolution is generated by the Balitsky-JIMWLK Hamiltonian (6.3), and at NNLL only the listed transitions (RgR2, R2gR2 at one loop; RgR3, R3gR, R3gR3 at two loops) contribute.
    Section 6.2 and eqs (6.27)-(6.29). The power counting that excludes other transitions (e.g., WW to WWW) until N^3LL is stated but not proven; a missed transition at NNLL would shift the extracted vertex.
  • ad hoc to paper The Regge-pole component equals the single-Reggeon exchange plus the planar part of the multi-Reggeon exchanges; the Regge cut is entirely non-planar (eq 8.3).
    Section 8.1, eq (8.3). This criterion is imported from refs [23,24], tested for 2 to 2 scattering through four loops; for 2 to 3 it is a conjecture, flagged by the authors, who propose the three-loop prediction (8.19) as a future test. This is the weakest structural input to the extraction.
  • domain assumption The single-Reggeon amplitude obeys the Regge-pole factorization ansatz (4.10) with the analytic form (4.12)-(4.13) fixed by signature and by the absence of sequential discontinuities.
    Sections 4.1-4.2. The Reggeization hypothesis and the phase choices in eq (4.11) are assumed; they are partially supported by the infrared analysis of appendix E but are not derived from first principles here.
  • standard math The pentagon functions close under differentiation (eq 3.3) and their MRK expansion (3.7)-(3.11) captures the leading x to 0 behavior; boundary constants are computed numerically at point X2, eq (3.15), and fitted to zeta values by PSLQ.
    Sections 3.1 and 3.3. The differential-equation system is taken from ref [76]; the expansion and the PSLQ reconstruction are standard applied techniques in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Two-Loop Lipatov Vertex in QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/62GEE23E

@misc{pith2026241220578,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Two-Loop Lipatov Vertex in QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/62GEE23E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20578}
}
read the original abstract

High-energy factorization of 2 -> 2 amplitudes in QCD has been recently pushed to the next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic order by determining the three-loop gluon Regge trajectory. This was based on computing multi-Reggeon exchanges using rapidity evolution in the shock-wave formalism, and disentangling between the Regge pole and Regge cut contributions. In the present paper we extend the relevant theoretical framework to 2 -> 3 processes, and compute all multi-Reggeon exchanges necessary for extracting the two-loop Reggeon-gluon-Reggeon Lipatov vertex from 2 -> 3 amplitudes. Then, specializing general amplitude methods to multi-Regge kinematics, we derive analytic expressions for non-planar two-loop gg -> ggg, gq -> ggq and qq -> qgq QCD amplitudes in that limit. Matching these to the multi-Reggeon computation, we determine the QCD Lipatov vertex in dimensional regularization at two loops through finite terms. We also determine the one-loop vertex through O(epsilon^4). All results are expressed in a compact form in terms of a basis of single-valued generalised polylogarithms, manifesting target-projectile symmetry and reality properties. Furthermore, our basis of functions is explicitly finite in the soft limit, featuring delicate cancellation of spurious rational poles by transcendental functions. Agreement between all three partonic channels, as well agreement of the maximal weight contributions with the super Yang-Mills Lipatov vertex provide robust checks of the result.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spacelike-Collinear Scattering by the Method of Regions

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The kinematic factorisation-violating part of the two-loop spacelike-collinear splitting amplitude comes entirely from a single hidden region with soft and Glauber loop momenta.

  2. New results on small-x resummation for splitting functions

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A closed-form all-order expression for the qg anomalous dimension, plus new all-order results for the LL gluon anomalous dimension and the finite qg/gg Green functions, derived and implemented in HELL 4.0.

  3. Regge factorization of tree-level QCD amplitudes using a minimal set of lightcone variables

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    All tree-level QCD multi-Regge emission vertices with up to four final-state partons are extracted in a minimal lightcone-variable frame and collected in the MREV Mathematica library.

  4. New evidence for the rapidity evolution in Mueller-Navelet dijet production: BFKL, Sudakov, and RG-invariance

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new matching of NLO BFKL resummation with high-energy factorization and Sudakov effects describes Mueller-Navelet dijet data and attributes the large-rapidity decorrelation to BFKL dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [26]

    Buccioni, F

    F. Buccioni, F. Caola, F. Devoto and G. Gambuti, Investigating the universality of five-point QCD scattering amplitudes at high energy , 2411.14050

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory and High-Energy Physics , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge Univ

    P.D.B. Collins, An Introduction to Regge Theory and High-Energy Physics , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam bridge, UK (2009)

    2009

  3. [2]

    Lipatov, Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov

    L. Lipatov, Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 23 (1976) 338

    1976

  4. [3]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and A. Quartarolo, Reggeization of quark quark scattering amplitude in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 2729 [hep-ph/9506432]

    arXiv 1996

  5. [4]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and M. Kotsky, Gluon Regge trajectory in the two loop approximation , Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 593 [hep-ph/9605357]

    arXiv 1996

  6. [5]

    Fadin, M

    V.S. Fadin, M. Kotsky and R. Fiore, Gluon Reggeization in QCD in the next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 359 (1995) 181

    1995

  7. [6]

    Fadin, Regge trajectory of a gluon in the two loop approximation , JETP Lett

    V.S. Fadin, Regge trajectory of a gluon in the two loop approximation , JETP Lett. 61 (1995) 346

    1995

  8. [7]

    Fadin, BFKL news , in LAFEX International School on High-Energy Physics (LISHEP

    V.S. Fadin, BFKL news , in LAFEX International School on High-Energy Physics (LISHEP

Show all 143 references
  1. [8]

    Fadin, M

    V. Fadin, M. Kozlov and A. Reznichenko, Gluon Reggeization in Yang-Mills Theories , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 085044 [1507.00823]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Fadin, R

    V. Fadin, R. Fiore, M. Kozlov and A. Reznichenko, Proof of the multi-Regge form of QCD amplitudes with gluon exchanges in the NLA , Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 74 [hep-ph/0602006]

    2006 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Forshaw and D.A

    J.R. Forshaw and D.A. Ross, Quantum Chromodynamics and the Pomeron , vol. 9, Oxford University Press (1998), 10.1017/9781009290111

    1998 doi

  4. [11]

    Fadin, E.A

    V.S. Fadin, E.A. Kuraev and L.N. Lipatov, On the Pomeranchuk Singularity in Asymptotically Free Theories, Phys. Lett. B 60 (1975) 50

    1975

  5. [12]

    Kuraev, L.N

    E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov and V.S. Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory, Sov. Phys. JETP 44 (1976) 443

    1976

  6. [13]

    Kuraev, L.N

    E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov and V.S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 199

    1977

  7. [14]

    Balitsky and L.N

    I.I. Balitsky and L.N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28 (1978) 822

    1978

  8. [15]

    Fadin and L.N

    V.S. Fadin and L.N. Lipatov, BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation , Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 127 [hep-ph/9802290]

    1998 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kovchegov and E

    Y.V. Kovchegov and E. Levin, Quantum Chromodynamics at High Energy , vol. 33, Oxford University Press (2013), 10.1017/9781009291446

    2013 doi

  10. [17]

    Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093 [1309.6521]

    S. Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize? , JHEP 05 (2015) 093 [1309.6521]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Caron-Huot, E

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi and L. Vernazza, Two-parton scattering in the high-energy limit , JHEP 06 (2017) 016 [1701.05241]. – 98 –

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Caron-Huot, E

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, J. Reichel and L. Vernazza, Infrared singularities of QCD scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit to all orders , JHEP 03 (2018) 098 [1711.04850]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Caron-Huot, E

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, J. Reichel and L. Vernazza, Two-parton scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit to high loop orders , JHEP 08 (2020) 116 [2006.01267]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Caron-Huot, D

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Chicherin, J. Henn, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia, Multi-Regge Limit of the Two-Loop Five-Point Amplitudes in N = 4 Super Yang-Mills and N = 8 Supergravity, JHEP 10 (2020) 188 [2003.03120]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Climbing three-Reggeon ladders: four-loop amplitudes in the high-energy limit in full colour , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L111501 [2012.00613]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit and the soft anomalous dimension through four lo ops, JHEP 03 (2022) 053 [2111.10664]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Falcioni, E

    G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Disentangling the Regge Cut and Regge Pole in Perturbative QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 132001 [2112.11098]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Abreu, G

    S. Abreu, G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, C. Milloy and L. Vernazza, Regge poles and cuts and the Lipatov vertex, PoS LL2024 (2024) 085

    2024

  19. [27]

    Fadin and L

    V. Fadin and L. Lipatov, Reggeon cuts in QCD amplitudes with negative signature , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 439 [1712.09805]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Fadin, Regge Cuts in QCD , Phys

    V.S. Fadin, Regge Cuts in QCD , Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 20 (2023) 341

    2023

  21. [29]

    Fadin, Colour structure of three-reggeon cuts in QCD , PoS ICPPCRubakov2023 (2024) 037

    V. Fadin, Colour structure of three-reggeon cuts in QCD , PoS ICPPCRubakov2023 (2024) 037

    2024

  22. [30]

    Rothstein and I.W

    I.Z. Rothstein and I.W. Stewart, An Effective Field Theory for Forward Scattering and Factorization Violation, JHEP 08 (2016) 025 [1601.04695]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Moult, S

    I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway and I.W. Stewart, Anomalous dimensions from soft Regge constants, JHEP 05 (2023) 025 [2207.02859]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A. Gao, I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway and I.W. Stewart, A collinear perspective on the Regge limit, JHEP 05 (2024) 328 [2401.00931]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A. Gao, I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway and I.W. Stewart, Reggeization in Color , 2411.09692

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Del Duca and E

    V. Del Duca and E. Glover, The High-energy limit of QCD at two loops , JHEP 10 (2001) 035 [hep-ph/0109028]

    2001 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, L. Magnea and C.D. White, An infrared approach to Reggeization, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 071104 [1108.5947]

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Del Duca, G

    V. Del Duca, G. Falcioni, L. Magnea and L. Vernazza, High-energy QCD amplitudes at two loops and beyond , Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 233 [1311.0304]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Del Duca, G

    V. Del Duca, G. Falcioni, L. Magnea and L. Vernazza, Analyzing high-energy factorization beyond next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy , JHEP 02 (2015) 029 [1409.8330]. – 99 –

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Balitsky, Operator expansion for high-energy scattering , Nucl

    I. Balitsky, Operator expansion for high-energy scattering , Nucl. Phys. B463 (1996) 99 [hep-ph/9509348]

    1996 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, L.D. McLerran and H. Weigert, The Intrinsic glue distribution at very small x , Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 5414 [hep-ph/9606337]

    1997 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert, The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Towards the high density regime , Phys. Rev. D59 (1998) 014014 [hep-ph/9706377]

    1998 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Lipatov, Gauge invariant effective action for high-energy processes in QCD , Nucl

    L.N. Lipatov, Gauge invariant effective action for high-energy processes in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 452 (1995) 369 [hep-ph/9502308]

    1995 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Bartels, L.N

    J. Bartels, L.N. Lipatov and A. Sabio Vera, BFKL Pomeron, Reggeized gluons and Bern-Dixon-Smirnov amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 045002 [0802.2065]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Bartels, L.N

    J. Bartels, L.N. Lipatov and A. Sabio Vera, N=4 supersymmetric Yang Mills scattering amplitudes at high energies: The Regge cut contribution , Eur. Phys. J. C 65 (2010) 587 [0807.0894]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Lipatov, Integrability of scattering amplitudes in N=4 SUSY , J

    L.N. Lipatov, Integrability of scattering amplitudes in N=4 SUSY , J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 304020 [0902.1444]

    2009 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Dixon, J.M

    L.J. Dixon, J.M. Drummond, C. Duhr and J. Pennington, The four-loop remainder function and multi-Regge behavior at NNLLA in planar N = 4 super-Yang- Mills theory , JHEP 06 (2014) 116 [1402.3300]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Del Duca, S

    V. Del Duca, S. Druc, J. Drummond, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, R. Marz ucca et al., All-order amplitudes at any multiplicity in the multi-Regge limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 161602 [1912.00188]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Bartels, N = 4 SYM Gauge Theories: The 2 → 6 Amplitude in the Regge Limit , (2021), DOI

    J. Bartels, N = 4 SYM Gauge Theories: The 2 → 6 Amplitude in the Regge Limit , (2021), DOI

    2021

  40. [49]

    Bern, L.J

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and V.A. Smirnov, Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 085001 [hep-th/0505205]

    2005 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L . Tancredi, Three-Loop Gluon Scattering in QCD and the Gluon Regge Trajectory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 212001 [2112.11097]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L . Tancredi, Three-loop helicity amplitudes for four-quark scattering in massless QCD, 2108.00055

    arXiv

  43. [52]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L . Tancredi, Three-loop helicity amplitudes for quark-gluon scattering in QCD , JHEP 12 (2022) 082 [2207.03503]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Bartels, High-Energy Behavior in a Nonabelian Gauge Theory (I): Tn→ m in the Leading lns Approximation, Nucl

    J. Bartels, High-Energy Behavior in a Nonabelian Gauge Theory (I): Tn→ m in the Leading lns Approximation, Nucl. Phys. B 151 (1979) 293

    1979

  45. [54]

    Bartels, High-Energy Behavior in a Nonabelian Gauge Theory (II): Fir st Corrections to Tn→ m Beyond the Leading lns Approximation, Nucl

    J. Bartels, High-Energy Behavior in a Nonabelian Gauge Theory (II): Fir st Corrections to Tn→ m Beyond the Leading lns Approximation, Nucl. Phys. B 175 (1980) 365

    1980

  46. [55]

    Fadin and L.N

    V.S. Fadin and L.N. Lipatov, Radiative corrections to QCD scattering amplitudes in a mul ti - Regge kinematics , Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 259. – 100 –

    1993

  47. [56]

    Del Duca, An introduction to the perturbative QCD pomeron and to jet ph ysics at large rapidities, hep-ph/9503226

    V. Del Duca, An introduction to the perturbative QCD pomeron and to jet ph ysics at large rapidities, hep-ph/9503226

    arXiv

  48. [57]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and A. Quartarolo, Quark contribution to the reggeon - reggeon - gluon vertex in QCD , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 5893 [hep-th/9405127]

    1994 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and M.I. Kotsky, Gribov’s theorem on soft emission and the reggeon-reggeon - gluon vertex at small transverse momentu m, Phys. Lett. B 389 (1996) 737 [hep-ph/9608229]

    1996 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Del Duca and C.R

    V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Virtual next-to-leading corrections to the Lipatov vertex , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 074004 [hep-ph/9810215]

    1999 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, E.W. Nigel Glover and V.A. Smirnov, The One-loop pentagon to higher orders in epsilon , JHEP 01 (2010) 042 [0905.0097]

    2010 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr and E.W. Nigel Glover, The Five-gluon amplitude in the high-energy limit, JHEP 12 (2009) 023 [0905.0100]

    2009 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Fadin, M

    V.S. Fadin, M. Fucilla and A. Papa, One-loop Lipatov vertex in QCD with higher ǫ-accuracy, 2302.09868

    arXiv

  54. [63]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita and B. Page , Analytic Form of Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Scattering Amplitudes in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 082002 [1812.04586]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page an d V. Sotnikov, Analytic Form of the Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Scattering Amplitudes i n QCD , JHEP 05 (2019) 084 [1904.00945]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov , Leading-color two-loop QCD corrections for three-jet production at hadron colliders , JHEP 07 (2021) 095 [2102.13609]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, F. Devoto, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuff el and L. Tancredi, Five-parton scattering in QCD at two loops , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 094025 [2311.09870]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [67]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, M. Klinkert and V. Sotnikov, Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. I. The gluon channe l, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 094023 [2311.10086]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [68]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita and V. Sotnikov, Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. II. The quark channels , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 094024 [2311.18752]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [69]

    De Laurentis, Non-Planar Two-Loop Amplitudes for Five-Parton Scatterin g, in Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory , 6, 2024 [ 2406.18374]

    G. De Laurentis, Non-Planar Two-Loop Amplitudes for Five-Parton Scatterin g, in Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory , 6, 2024 [ 2406.18374]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Abreu, G

    S. Abreu, G. De Laurentis, G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, C. Milloy and L. Ve rnazza, The Two-Loop Lipatov Vertex in QCD , 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14568484

    2024 doi

  62. [71]

    Del Duca, Equivalence of the Parke-Taylor and the Fadin-Kuraev-Lipa tov amplitudes in the high-energy limit , Phys

    V. Del Duca, Equivalence of the Parke-Taylor and the Fadin-Kuraev-Lipa tov amplitudes in the high-energy limit , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1527 [hep-ph/9503340]

    1995 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Bassetto, M

    A. Bassetto, M. Ciafaloni and G. Marchesini, Jet Structure and Infrared Sensitive Quantities in Perturbative QCD , Phys. Rept. 100 (1983) 201

    1983

  64. [73]

    Catani and M.H

    S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, The Dipole formalism for the calculation of QCD jet cross-sections at next-to-leading order , Phys. Lett. B 378 (1996) 287 [hep-ph/9602277]. – 101 –

    1996 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Catani and M.H

    S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in N LO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 291 [hep-ph/9605323]

    1997 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, L. Magnea and C.D. White, The Infrared structure of gauge theory amplitudes in the high-energy limit , JHEP 12 (2011) 021 [1109.3581]

    2011 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Chicherin and V

    D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov, Pentagon Functions for Scattering of Five Massless Particles, JHEP 20 (2020) 167 [2009.07803]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Wasow, Asymptotic expansions for ordinary differential equations , vol

    W. Wasow, Asymptotic expansions for ordinary differential equations , vol. XIV, Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1965)

    1965

  69. [78]

    Hidding, DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integr als in terms of one-dimensional series expansions , Comput

    M. Hidding, DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integr als in terms of one-dimensional series expansions , Comput. Phys. Commun. 269 (2021) 108125 [2006.05510]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Duhr and F

    C. Duhr and F. Dulat, PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses , JHEP 08 (2019) 135 [1904.07279]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Panzer, Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithm s with applications to Feynman integrals, Comput

    E. Panzer, Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithm s with applications to Feynman integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 188 (2015) 148 [1403.3385]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [81]

    De Laurentis and B

    G. De Laurentis and B. Page, Ans¨ atze for scattering amplitudes from p-adic numbers and algebraic geometry, JHEP 12 (2022) 140 [2203.04269]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Chawdhry, p-adic reconstruction of rational functions in multiloop a mplitudes, Phys

    H.A. Chawdhry, p-adic reconstruction of rational functions in multiloop a mplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 056028 [2312.03672]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Byrne, G

    E.P. Byrne, G. De Laurentis, E. Gardi and J.M. Smillie, Work in progress ,

  75. [84]

    Laurentis and D

    G. Laurentis and D. Maˆ ıtre,Extracting analytical one-loop amplitudes from numerical evaluations, JHEP 07 (2019) 123 [1904.04067]

    2019 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Byrne, V

    E.P. Byrne, V. Del Duca, L.J. Dixon, E. Gardi and J.M. Smillie, One-loop central-emission vertex for two gluons in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory , JHEP 08 (2022) 271 [2204.12459]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Byrne, One-loop five-parton amplitudes in the NMRK limit , JHEP 07 (2024) 284 [2312.15051]

    E.P. Byrne, One-loop five-parton amplitudes in the NMRK limit , JHEP 07 (2024) 284 [2312.15051]

    2024 arXiv

  78. [87]

    von Manteuffel and R.M

    A. von Manteuffel and R.M. Schabinger, A novel approach to integration by parts reduction , Phys. Lett. B 744 (2015) 101 [1406.4513]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Peraro, Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate fu nctional reconstruction, JHEP 12 (2016) 030 [1608.01902]

    T. Peraro, Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate fu nctional reconstruction, JHEP 12 (2016) 030 [1608.01902]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [89]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14501989

    https://github.com/GDeLaurentis/antares. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14501989

    doi

  81. [90]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14536697

    https://github.com/GDeLaurentis/antares-results. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14536697

    doi

  82. [91]

    https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11518261

    https://github.com/GDeLaurentis/lips. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11518261

    doi

  83. [92]

    https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11114230

    https://github.com/GDeLaurentis/pyadic. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11114230

    doi

  84. [93]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Kraus, B. Page et al., Caravel: A C++ framework for the computation of multi-loop amplitudes with numerical unitarity , Comput. Phys. Commun. 267 (2021) 108069 [2009.11957]. – 102 –

    2021 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Grisaru, H.J

    M.T. Grisaru, H.J. Schnitzer and H.-S. Tsao, The Reggeization of elementary particles in renormalizable gauge theories: scalars , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 2864

    1974

  86. [95]

    Grisaru, H.J

    M.T. Grisaru, H.J. Schnitzer and H.-S. Tsao, Reggeization of yang-mills gauge mesons in theories with a spontaneously broken symmetry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 811

    1973

  87. [96]

    Grisaru, H.J

    M.T. Grisaru, H.J. Schnitzer and H.-S. Tsao, Reggeization of elementary particles in renormalizable gauge theories - vectors and spinors , Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 4498

    1973

  88. [97]

    Drummond, P.V

    I.T. Drummond, P.V. Landshoff and W.J. Zakrzewski, Signature in production amplitudes , Phys. Lett. B 28 (1969) 676

    1969

  89. [98]

    742–776, 7, 1998 [ hep-ph/9807528]

    Session A: Particle Physics for High School Teachers - Se ssion B: Advanced School in HEP - Session C: Workshop on Diffractive Physics , pp. 742–776, 7, 1998 [ hep-ph/9807528]

    1998 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Bartels, A Reggeon Calculus for the Production Amplitude

    J. Bartels, A Reggeon Calculus for the Production Amplitude. 1. , Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2977

    1975

  91. [100]

    Fadin, R

    V.S. Fadin, R. Fiore and A. Papa, One loop Reggeon-Reggeon gluon vertex at arbitrary space-time dimension, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 034001 [hep-ph/0008006]

    2001 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Z. Bern, V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, The Infrared behavior of one loop gluon amplitudes at next-to-next-to-leading order , Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998) 168 [hep-ph/9810409]

    1998 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes , Math

    A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes , Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998) 497 [1105.2076]

    1998 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives , math/0103059

    A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives , math/0103059

    arXiv

  95. [104]

    Schnetz, Generalized single-valued hyperlogarithms, 2111.11246

    O. Schnetz, Generalized single-valued hyperlogarithms, 2111.11246

    arXiv

  96. [105]

    Brown, Polylogarithmes multiples uniformes en une variable , Compt

    F.C.S. Brown, Polylogarithmes multiples uniformes en une variable , Compt. Rend. Math. 338 (2004) 527

    2004

  97. [106]

    Pennington, The six-point remainder function to all loop orders in the mu lti-Regge limit, JHEP 01 (2013) 059 [1209.5357]

    J. Pennington, The six-point remainder function to all loop orders in the mu lti-Regge limit, JHEP 01 (2013) 059 [1209.5357]

    2013 arXiv

  98. [107]

    Dixon, C

    L.J. Dixon, C. Duhr and J. Pennington, Single-valued harmonic polylogarithms and the multi-Regge limit, JHEP 10 (2012) 074 [1207.0186]

    2012 arXiv

  99. [108]

    Brown, Single-valued Motivic Periods and Multiple Zeta Values , SIGMA 2 (2014) e25 [1309.5309]

    F. Brown, Single-valued Motivic Periods and Multiple Zeta Values , SIGMA 2 (2014) e25 [1309.5309]

    2014 arXiv

  100. [109]

    Schnetz, Graphical functions and single-valued multiple polylogar ithms, Commun

    O. Schnetz, Graphical functions and single-valued multiple polylogar ithms, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 08 (2014) 589 [1302.6445]

    2014 arXiv

  101. [110]

    Del Duca, L.J

    V. Del Duca, L.J. Dixon, C. Duhr and J. Pennington, The BFKL equation, Mueller-Navelet jets and single-valued harmonic polylogarithms , JHEP 02 (2014) 086 [1309.6647]

    2014 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Bauer, A

    C.W. Bauer, A. Frink and R. Kreckel, Introduction to the GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language , J. Symb. Comput. 33 (2002) 1 [cs/0004015]

    2002 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Kotikov and L.N

    A.V. Kotikov and L.N. Lipatov, DGLAP and BFKL evolution equations in the N=4 supersymmetric gauge theory , in 35th Annual Winter School on Nuclear and Particle Physics, 12, 2001 [ hep-ph/0112346]

    2001 arXiv

  104. [113]

    Kotikov and L.N

    A.V. Kotikov and L.N. Lipatov, DGLAP and BFKL equations in the N = 4 supersymmetric gauge theory , Nucl. Phys. B 661 (2003) 19 [hep-ph/0208220]

    2003 arXiv

  105. [114]

    Gardi, S

    E. Gardi, S. Caron-Huot, J. Reichel and L. Vernazza, The High-Energy Limit of 2-to-2 Partonic Scattering Amplitudes , PoS RADCOR2019 (2019) 050 [1912.10883]. – 103 –

    2019 arXiv

  106. [115]

    Anastasiou, E.W.N

    C. Anastasiou, E.W.N. Glover and C. Oleari, Application of the negative dimension approach to massless scalar box integrals , Nucl. Phys. B 565 (2000) 445 [hep-ph/9907523]

    2000 arXiv

  107. [116]

    Anastasiou, E.W.N

    C. Anastasiou, E.W.N. Glover and C. Oleari, Scalar one loop integrals using the negative dimension approach, Nucl. Phys. B 572 (2000) 307 [hep-ph/9907494]

    2000 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Bloch, Higher Regulators, Algebraic K-Theory, and Zeta Functions of Elliptic Curves , CRM Monograph Series, American Mathematical Society (2011)

    S. Bloch, Higher Regulators, Algebraic K-Theory, and Zeta Functions of Elliptic Curves , CRM Monograph Series, American Mathematical Society (2011)

    2011

  109. [118]

    Del Duca, G

    V. Del Duca, G. Falcioni, L. Magnea and L. Vernazza, Beyond Reggeization for two- and three-loop QCD amplitudes , PoS RADCOR2013 (2013) 046 [1312.5098]

    2013 arXiv

  110. [119]

    Fadin, Particularities of the NNLLA BFKL , AIP Conf

    V. Fadin, Particularities of the NNLLA BFKL , AIP Conf. Proc. 1819 (2017) 060003 [1612.04481]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [120]

    Fadin, Chapter 4: BFKL — Past and Future , in From the Past to the Future , J

    V. Fadin, Chapter 4: BFKL — Past and Future , in From the Past to the Future , J. Bartels, V. Fadin, E. Levin, A. Levy, V. Kim and A. Sabio-Vera, eds., pp. 63–9 0 (2021), DOI [2012.11931]

    2021 arXiv

  112. [121]

    Fadin, Three-Reggeon Cuts in QCD Amplitudes , Phys

    V.S. Fadin, Three-Reggeon Cuts in QCD Amplitudes , Phys. Atom. Nucl. 84 (2021) 100

    2021

  113. [122]

    Eden, P.V

    R.J. Eden, P.V. Landshoff, D.I. Olive and J.C. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix , Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1966)

    1966

  114. [123]

    Kwiecinski and M

    J. Kwiecinski and M. Praszalowicz, Three Gluon Integral Equation and Odd c Singlet Regge Singularities in QCD , Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 413

    1980

  115. [124]

    Lipatov, Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high energies in co nnection with exactly solvable spin models , JETP Lett

    L.N. Lipatov, Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high energies in co nnection with exactly solvable spin models , JETP Lett. 59 (1994) 596 [ hep-th/9311037]

    1994 arXiv

  116. [125]

    Faddeev and G.P

    L.D. Faddeev and G.P. Korchemsky, High-energy QCD as a completely integrable model , Phys. Lett. B342 (1995) 311 [hep-th/9404173]

    1995 arXiv

  117. [126]

    Derkachov, G.P

    S.E. Derkachov, G.P. Korchemsky and A.N. Manashov, Noncompact Heisenberg spin magnets from high-energy QCD: 1. Baxter Q operator and separ ation of variables , Nucl. Phys. B 617 (2001) 375 [hep-th/0107193]

    2001 arXiv

  118. [127]

    Derkachov, G.P

    S.E. Derkachov, G.P. Korchemsky, J. Kotanski and A.N. Mana shov, Noncompact Heisenberg spin magnets from high-energy QCD. 2. Quantizat ion conditions and energy spectrum, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 237 [hep-th/0204124]

    2002 arXiv

  119. [128]

    Mandelstam, Cuts in the Angular Momentum Plane

    S. Mandelstam, Cuts in the Angular Momentum Plane. 2 , Nuovo Cim. 30 (1963) 1148

    1963

  120. [129]

    Ciafaloni and G

    M. Ciafaloni and G. Camici, Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation , Phys. Lett. B 430 (1998) 349 [hep-ph/9803389]

    1998 arXiv

  121. [130]

    Kotikov and L.N

    A.V. Kotikov and L.N. Lipatov, NLO corrections to the BFKL equation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories , Nucl. Phys. B 582 (2000) 19 [hep-ph/0004008]

    2000 arXiv

  122. [131]

    Del Duca, Real next-to-leading corrections to the multi - gluon ampli tudes in the helicity formalism, Phys

    V. Del Duca, Real next-to-leading corrections to the multi - gluon ampli tudes in the helicity formalism, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 989 [hep-ph/9601211]

    1996 arXiv

  123. [132]

    Del Duca and C.R

    V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Virtual next-to-leading corrections to the impact factors in the high-energy limit , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4069 [hep-ph/9711309]

    1998 arXiv

  124. [133]

    Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order , Phys

    S. Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order , Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439]

    1998 arXiv

  125. [134]

    Sterman and M.E

    G.F. Sterman and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Multiloop amplitudes and resummation , Phys. Lett. B 552 (2003) 48 [hep-ph/0210130]. – 104 –

    2003 arXiv

  126. [135]

    Aybat, L.J

    S. Aybat, L.J. Dixon and G.F. Sterman, The Two-loop soft anomalous dimension matrix and resummation at next-to-next-to leading pole , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 074004 [hep-ph/0607309]

    2006 arXiv

  127. [136]

    Aybat, L.J

    S. Aybat, L.J. Dixon and G.F. Sterman, The Two-loop anomalous dimension matrix for soft gluon exchange , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 072001 [hep-ph/0606254]

    2006 arXiv

  128. [137]

    Gardi and L

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea, Factorization constraints for soft anomalous dimensions i n QCD scattering amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2009) 079 [0901.1091]

    2009 arXiv

  129. [138]

    Gardi and L

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea, Infrared singularities in QCD amplitudes , Frascati Phys. Ser. 50 (2010) 137 [0908.3273]

    2010 arXiv

  130. [139]

    Dixon, E

    L.J. Dixon, E. Gardi and L. Magnea, On soft singularities at three loops and beyond , JHEP 02 (2010) 081 [0910.3653]

    2010 arXiv

  131. [140]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert, Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in pertur bative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 162001 [0901.0722]

    2009 arXiv

  132. [141]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert, Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes and N 3LL resummation for n-jet processes, JHEP 01 (2020) 025 [1908.11379]

    2020 arXiv

  133. [142]

    Almelid, C

    O. Almelid, C. Duhr and E. Gardi, Three-loop corrections to the soft anomalous dimension in multileg scattering , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 172002 [1507.00047]

    2016 arXiv

  134. [143]

    Almelid, C

    O. Almelid, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, A. McLeod and C.D. White, Bootstrapping the QCD soft anomalous dimension , JHEP 09 (2017) 073 [1706.10162]

    2017 arXiv

  135. [144]

    Magnea, Non-abelian infrared divergences on the celestial sphere , JHEP 05 (2021) 282 [2104.10254]

    L. Magnea, Non-abelian infrared divergences on the celestial sphere , JHEP 05 (2021) 282 [2104.10254]. – 105 –

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.