Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Towards the BBGKY hierarchy: a scheme beyond the Boltzmann equation and application to a weakly confined QCD gas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-level correlation time approximation makes conserved correlators of a weakly confined QCD gas analytically solvable.

desk verdict A clean formal extension of RTA to the second BBGKY level, but the equilibrium f2=0 reference state is unphysical and invalidates the QCD gas application. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00099 v1 pith:LJSES6X4 submitted 2024-12-30 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-ph

Sašo Grozdanov , Alexander Soloviev This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechhep-ph
keywords BBGKYhierarchycorrelationtimeapproximationrelaxationkinetictheoryQCDgasretardedcorrelatorsbranchcutsshearviscosity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops the correlation time approximation (CTA), a scheme for going one rung beyond the Boltzmann equation in the BBGKY hierarchy: instead of closing the first equation with a single relaxation time, it keeps the correlated two-particle piece $g_{12}$ dynamical, with its own relaxation time $\tau_C$. Applied to a gas of weakly confined QCD hadrons just below the confinement temperature, the scheme yields, for the first time, analytic retarded correlation functions that include the effect of the second hierarchy level. The central results are two logarithmic branch cuts in the conserved correlators, with branch points at $\omega = \pm k - i/\tau_R$ and $\omega = \pm k - i/\tau_C$, a new gapped pole, and a correction to the shear viscosity ratio $\eta/s = \frac{\tau_R T_0}{5}\left(1 - \hat{\sigma}\frac{3\tau_C T_0^2}{4\pi^2} + O(\hat{\sigma}^2)\right)$. If correct, the CTA is a quantitative handle on non-hydrodynamic, 'deeper-UV' parts of the operator spectrum that the Boltzmann relaxation time approximation cannot access.

What carries the argument

The central object is the BBGKY hierarchy, the infinite chain of equations for $n$-particle distribution functions in which the evolution of $f_n$ is driven by a collision kernel $C[f_{n+1}]$ depending on the next level. The paper's machinery is the correlation time approximation (CTA), which closes this chain by decomposing $f_n$ into products of lower-level distributions plus an irreducible correlation $g_{1...n}$, and assigning each level its own relaxation time $\tau_n$. At level two this is $f_2 = f_1 f_1 + g_{12}$, with $C[f_2]$ split into an RTA term for $f_1 f_1$ and an exact linearized relaxation equation for $g_{12}$ with timescale $\tau_C$. The coupling between the levels is engineered by a weak long-range linear confining potential whose Fourier transform gives a derivative of a delta function, $\hat{\sigma} \sim \sigma V$, and the resulting angular integrals produce logarithms of the form $\ln[(\omega - k + i/\tau_n)/(\omega + k + i/\tau_n)]$, which are what generate the branch cuts.

What would settle it

Recalculate the same two-level hierarchy with the physical equilibrium $f_2^{eq}=f_1^{eq}f_1^{eq}$, i.e., $g_{12}^{eq}=0$, and check whether the $O(\hat{\sigma})$ corrections to $D$ and $\eta/s$ survive; if the sign or branch structure changes, the reported results depend on the unphysical zero-pair equilibrium rather than on genuine two-body correlations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the two-level BBGKY hierarchy, truncated in the correlation time approximation, can be solved analytically. Starting from the decomposition $f_2 = f_1 f_1 + g_{12}$, the authors approximate the uncorrelated part $f_1 f_1$ with the standard RTA collision term, while the correlated piece $g_{12}$ obeys its own linearized relaxation equation with timescale $\tau_C$. A weak linear confining potential $U_L = \sigma r$ couples the two levels through a term proportional to the Fourier transform of the linear potential, so all corrections appear to first order in $\hat{\sigma}$. Solving the linearized equations in momentum space gives explicit retarded correlators whose analytic structure contains two logarithmic branch cuts, at $\omega = \pm k - i/\tau_R$ and $\omega = \pm k - i/\tau_C$, together with the hydrodynamic poles and a new gapped pole. In the $\hat{\sigma} \to 0$ limit the expressions reduce exactly to the RTA results of [11, 12].

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the equilibrium condition $f_2^{eq}=0$, imposed by setting $g_{12}^{eq} = -f_1^{eq} f_1^{eq}$; a physical gas has a nonzero equilibrium two-particle density, and all $O(\hat{\sigma})$ results inherit this empty-pair reference state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The retarded current and stress-energy correlators of a weakly confined QCD gas now contain two logarithmic branch cuts instead of one, so late-time relaxation includes non-exponential tails governed by $\tau_R$ and $\tau_C$.
  • Charge diffusion is slowed by two-body correlations: $D = \frac{\tau_R}{3}\left(1 - \hat{\sigma}\frac{\chi \tau_C}{T_0} + O(\hat{\sigma}^2)\right)$.
  • Sound attenuation and shear momentum diffusion receive negative $O(\hat{\sigma})$ corrections, lowering $\eta/s$ from its RTA value; the sign matches the standard picture of $\eta/s$ interpolating between strong and weak coupling.
  • The scheme predicts that each further level of the hierarchy adds a new logarithmic branch cut, producing a tower of cuts reminiscent of the 'Christmas tree' structure of holographic quasinormal spectra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The analytic solvability relies on the linear potential's special Fourier transform; for a generic potential the same two-level scheme would require numerical work, yet the qualitative spectral features (an extra cut and a gapped pole) should persist.
  • The unphysical equilibrium choice $f_2^{eq}=0$ is likely to matter quantitatively: a physical gas has $f_2^{eq}=f_1^{eq}f_1^{eq}$ (i.e., $g_{12}^{eq}=0$), and restoring that would change the matching conditions and the $O(\hat{\sigma})$ coefficients, so the specific numbers in the viscosity formula should not yet be compared directly to lattice or experiment.
  • Iterating the CTA to higher levels may provide a systematic expansion of the spectral function whose resummation could connect the kinetic and holographic descriptions at intermediate coupling.
  • Promoting $\tau_C$ to a momentum-dependent function would likely smear the logarithmic branch points, just as momentum-dependent RTA modifies the single-cut spectrum, so the exact branch point positions in (31) may be an artifact of constant relaxation times.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'correlation time approximation' (CTA) for truncating the BBGKY hierarchy one level beyond the Boltzmann equation. It keeps the one-particle distribution f1 and the correlated part g12 of the two-particle distribution, closes the hierarchy with RTA-like relaxation terms at each level, and applies the resulting linearized equations to a weakly confined QCD gas with a linear confining potential. The authors derive retarded correlators of conserved densities and currents to first order in the potential coupling sigma_hat, find two logarithmic branch cuts and a new gapped pole in the spectral functions, and obtain corrections to charge diffusion, sound attenuation, and the shear viscosity ratio eta/s. In the limit sigma_hat -> 0, the expressions reduce to the known RTA correlators of Refs. [11,12].

Significance. If the construction were physically sound, this would be the first analytic calculation of conserved correlators that explicitly includes a second level of the BBGKY hierarchy, and the resulting spectral structure (an additional branch cut and a gapped pole) would be a useful qualitative bridge between kinetic theory and holographic or strong-coupling spectra. The paper is also transparent about the free parameters tau_R and tau_C and provides explicit closed-form expressions in Appendix A, with a correct sigma_hat=0 limit. However, the physical interpretation rests on an equilibrium two-particle state that is inconsistent with the definition of reduced distribution functions, and on a distributional Fourier transform of the confining potential that is not derived. These are load-bearing problems: the correlators, branch cuts, and eta/s correction are all computed around an unphysical reference state, so the claimed application to a weakly confined QCD gas is not supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (21)-(22) and Eq. (4)] The equilibrium ansatz f2_eq = 0, implemented by setting g12_eq = -f1_eq f1_eq in Eq. (22), is inconsistent with the definition of reduced distribution functions in Eq. (4). Integrating f2 over the phase space of particle 2 gives (N-1) f1, so if f2_eq vanishes then f1_eq must vanish for N>1, contradicting Eq. (21). The paper states after Eq. (14) that 'in equilibrium, f_n^eq = 0 for n >= 2' without proof, but this is not a property of the BBGKY hierarchy: for an ideal gas f2_eq = f1_eq f1_eq, and interactions generate nonzero correlations. The present choice also makes g12_eq equal to -f1_eq f1_eq at all separations, which violates the cluster property that correlations decay at large distances. Every O(sigma_hat) result, including the linearized solutions in Eqs. (25)-(26), the correlators in Appendix A, and the transport corrections in Eqs. (33), (39), and (42), is computed as a fluctuation about this empty-pair reference state. This is a load-bearing error, not a local presentation issue, because it undermines the physical meaning of the central results.
  2. [Eq. (16) and Eqs. (32)-(42)] The Fourier representation U_L(Q) = -i sigma_hat delta'(Q) with sigma_hat = sigma V is asserted without derivation. A linearly growing confining potential is not absolutely integrable, so its Fourier transform requires an explicit regularization, and the resulting distributional expression must be justified. As written, the substitution introduces an arbitrary system volume V into all sigma_hat corrections: the charge diffusion coefficient in Eq. (33), the sound attenuation in Eq. (39), and the shear viscosity ratio in Eq. (42) all depend on sigma V. Since eta/s and diffusion constants are intensive transport coefficients, this volume dependence is a red flag; the authors should show that the final observables are independent of the regulator or explain why V~R^3 (with R~1 fm) is a physical scale rather than an artifact of the Fourier transform. Without this derivation, the sigma_hat corrections, including the central eta/s result, are not well defined.
  3. [Eqs. (30)-(31) and Appendix A] The central structural claim—that the second BBGKY level produces a new logarithmic branch cut with branch points at omega = +/-k - i/tau_C and a new gapped pole—is derived entirely from the equilibrium closure g12_eq = -f1_eq f1_eq. If this closure is replaced by a physically acceptable equilibrium correlation function, both the linearized equation (18) and the solution (25) change; the analytic structure of the correlators may then be different. The paper therefore does not currently establish that the 'two cuts and a gapped pole' structure is a robust feature of the CTA truncation for a weakly confined gas. The authors should either correct the equilibrium state and repeat the calculation, or clearly state that the results apply only to the artificial zero-pair reference state and explain why that state is relevant to the QCD system.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (16)] The notation for the Fourier-transformed g12 in Eq. (16), written as g12(k-Q, p1, Q, p2), is confusing because the first spatial argument mixes the external wavevector k with the integration variable Q; please define the sign and ordering conventions for the two spatial Fourier variables explicitly.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The right panel uses sigma_hat = 1.18 while the left and middle panels use sigma_hat = 0.18; the caption should explain this choice, since the perturbative expansion in sigma_hat is used throughout and a value of 1.18 is not clearly within the small-sigma_hat regime.
  3. [Eq. (43)] The displayed logarithm in Eq. (43) is missing parentheses: it should be written as ln((omega - k + i/tau_n)/(omega + k + i/tau_n)) rather than 'ln omega - k + i/tau_n / omega + k + i/tau_n'.
  4. [After Eq. (14)] The sentence 'It is straightforward to see that the CTA still leads to positive entropy production (the H-theorem)' is not demonstrated; given the unusual equilibrium state, a brief proof or a reference would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the CTA derivation is self-contained, with tau_R and tau_C as inputs and the eta/s result compared to holography only after derivation.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The two-level CTA is introduced as a truncation ansatz (Eq. (14)), with tau_R and tau_C explicitly stated as inputs that "cannot be determined within the present theory" (Future directions section). The retarded correlators and the eta/s correction are then solved analytically from Eqs. (17)-(18) and compared with holography only after the fact; the paper does not fit tau_R, tau_C, or sigma_hat to reproduce target data. Self-citations [12], [40-42], and [47] are used for comparison (the sigma_hat=0 limit reproduces [11,12], holographic spectra are analogous, and [47] is a future direction), not as load-bearing ingredients in the derivation. The nonstandard equilibrium choice g12^eq = -f1^eq f1^eq (Eq. (22)), so that f2^eq = 0, is a physical assumption, not a definition of the target result. As the reader's note observes, this state violates the normalization sum rule from Eq. (4) when N>1, making the physical consistency of the reference state questionable, but that is a correctness or modelling concern, not a circular-logic step. No prediction reduces to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on a hierarchy truncation with two undetermined relaxation times, a long-range linear potential treated through a distributional Fourier transform, and a nonstandard equilibrium with f2 = 0. None of these are derived from QCD; they are modelling inputs. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • tau_R
    One-particle relaxation time in Eq. (7), an input that the paper acknowledges must come from microscopic physics.
  • tau_C = set to tau_R/2 in Fig. 1
    Correlation relaxation time for g12 in Eq. (18), introduced as a free timescale and not derived.
  • sigma_hat = sigma V with V ~ (1 fm)^3; plotted at 0.18 and 1.18
    Dimensionless coupling of the linear confining potential to the hierarchy, chosen by hand and used as a small expansion parameter.
  • V = R^3 with R ~ 1 fm
    Characteristic volume of the QCD droplet, sets the normalization of sigma_hat in Eq. (16).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The BBGKY hierarchy with Hamiltonian (3) describes the weakly confined QCD gas as a gas of quasi-particles.
    Used throughout the paper to justify applying classical kinetic theory to hadronic matter below T_c.
  • domain assumption The two-particle distribution decomposes as f2 = f1 f1 + g12 and the correlated part obeys a linear relaxation equation with C[g123] = 0.
    Defines the CTA truncation, closing the hierarchy at the second level.
  • ad hoc to paper Equilibrium n-particle distributions vanish for n >= 2, so g12_eq = -f1_eq f1_eq.
    Eq. (22); this makes f2_eq = 0, which is not the equilibrium of a physical gas.
  • ad hoc to paper The Fourier transform of the linear confining potential is U_L(Q) = -i sigma_hat delta'(Q) with sigma_hat = sigma V.
    Eq. (16); a nonstandard distributional transform that is not derived and differs from the usual transform of a linear potential.
  • domain assumption Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are used for the equilibrium distribution of a massless gas.
    Eq. (21); classical statistics are applied even though the QCD gas is quantum-mechanical.
  • standard math Retarded correlators are computed through the variational principle delta J / delta A and Ward identities.
    Standard linear response framework used in Eq. (29) and the appendix.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards the BBGKY hierarchy: a scheme beyond the Boltzmann equation and application to a weakly confined QCD gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LJSES6X4

@misc{pith2026250100099,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards the BBGKY hierarchy: a scheme beyond the Boltzmann equation and application to a weakly confined QCD gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LJSES6X4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00099}
}
abstract

In classical kinetic theory, the BBGKY hierarchy is an infinite chain of integro-differential equations that describes the full time-reversal-invariant (Liouville) system of interacting (quasi)-particles in terms of $N$-particle distribution functions. In this work, instead of truncating the hierarchy at the lowest level, as is done by the Boltzmann equation, we develop a scheme similar to the relaxation time approximation that is in principle able to account for the entire chain of equations. We then explicitly investigate its truncation at the second level of the BBGKY hierarchy and, within this scheme, study the spectra of conserved operator correlation functions in a gas of weakly confined hadrons. We also discuss how these higher levels account for parts of the operator spectra `deeper in the ultra-violet regime' and compare them to known results derived from the holographic duality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00099 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Left: The analytic structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Imaging non-hydrodynamic modes with jet wakes

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In the long-wavelength limit, jet-wake angular moments with ℓ≥3 vanish in hydrodynamics and directly image the non-hydrodynamic relaxation spectrum of the medium.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Chen, Introduction to plasma physics and Controlled Fusion (Springer Cham, 2018)

    F. Chen, Introduction to plasma physics and Controlled Fusion (Springer Cham, 2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 339 (2018), arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    J. Yvon, La th´ eorie statistique des fluides et l’´ equation d’´ etat, Actualit´ es scientifiques et industrielles : hydrody- namique, acoustique: Th´ eories m´ ecaniques (Hermann & cie, 1935)

    work page 1935

  5. [5]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, Kinetic Equations, Journal of Physics USSR 10, 265 (1946)

    work page 1946

  6. [6]

    J. G. Kirkwood, The Statistical Mechanical Theory of Transport Processes I. General Theory, J. Chem. Phys. 14, 180 (1946)

    work page 1946

  7. [7]

    Born and H

    M. Born and H. S. Green, A General Kinetic Theory of Liquids. I. The Molecular Distribution Functions, Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 188, 10 (1946)

    work page 1946

  8. [8]

    We also note some recent developments in using the BBGKY in nearly integrable systems [48]

    work page

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    P. L. Bhatnagar, E. P. Gross, and M. Krook, A Model for Collision Processes in Gases. I. Small Amplitude Pro- cesses in Charged and Neutral One-Component Systems, Physical Review 94, 511 (1954)

    1954

  2. [10]

    Anderson and H

    J. Anderson and H. Witting, A relativistic relaxation- time model for the boltzmann equation, Physica 74, 466 (1974)

    1974

  3. [11]

    Romatschke, Retarded correlators in kinetic theory: branch cuts, poles and hydrodynamic onset transitions, Eur

    P. Romatschke, Retarded correlators in kinetic theory: branch cuts, poles and hydrodynamic onset transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 352 (2016), arXiv:1512.02641 [hep- th]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bajec, S

    M. Bajec, S. Grozdanov, and A. Soloviev, Spectra of cor- relators in the relaxation time approximation of kinetic theory, JHEP 08, 065, arXiv:2403.17769 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Kurkela and U

    A. Kurkela and U. A. Wiedemann, Analytic structure of nonhydrodynamic modes in kinetic theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 776 (2019), arXiv:1712.04376 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Effective kinetic theory for high temperature gauge theories, JHEP 01, 030, arXiv:hep-ph/0209353

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Florkowski, E

    W. Florkowski, E. Maksymiuk, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, Exact solution of the (0+1)-dimensional Boltzmann equation for a massive gas, Phys. Rev. C 89, 054908 (2014), arXiv:1402.7348 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    G. S. Denicol, U. W. Heinz, M. Martinez, J. Noronha, and M. Strickland, New Exact Solution of the Relativistic Boltzmann Equation and its Hydrodynamic Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 202301 (2014), arXiv:1408.5646 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Spectrum of the Boltzmann collision operator for λϕ4 theory in the classical regime, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138487 (2024), 8 arXiv:2209.10370 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035003 (2021), arXiv:2005.12299 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion col- lisions: a review, Eur

    A. Soloviev, Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion col- lisions: a review, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 319 (2022), arXiv:2109.15081 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Jankowski and M

    J. Jankowski and M. Spali´ nski, Hydrodynamic attractors in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 132, 104048 (2023), arXiv:2303.09414 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bonitz, Correlation time approximation in non- markovian kinetics, Physics Letters A 221, 85 (1996)

    M. Bonitz, Correlation time approximation in non- markovian kinetics, Physics Letters A 221, 85 (1996)

    1996

  14. [22]

    Liboff, Kinetic Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 2003)

    R. Liboff, Kinetic Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 2003)

    2003

  15. [23]

    A. Deur, S. J. Brodsky, and G. F. de Teramond, The QCD Running Coupling, Nucl. Phys. 90, 1 (2016), arXiv:1604.08082 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    G. S. Bali and K. Schilling, Static quark - anti-quark potential: Scaling behavior and finite size effects in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 46, 2636 (1992)

    1992

  17. [25]

    Kaczmarek, F

    O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and M. Lutge- meier, Heavy quark potentials in quenched QCD at high temperature, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034021 (2000), arXiv:hep- lat/9908010

    2000

  18. [26]

    Bicudo, The QCD string tension curve, the ferromag- netic magnetization, and the quark-antiquark confining potential at finite Temperature, Phys

    P. Bicudo, The QCD string tension curve, the ferromag- netic magnetization, and the quark-antiquark confining potential at finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034507 (2010), arXiv:1003.0936 [hep-lat]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    G. S. Bali, QCD forces and heavy quark bound states, Phys. Rept. 343, 1 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0001312

    2001 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. P. Trawi´ nski, S. D. G lazek, S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de T´ eramond, and H. G. Dosch, Effective confining po- tentials for QCD, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074017 (2014), arXiv:1403.5651 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Blaizot and E

    J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, The Quark gluon plasma: Col- lective dynamics and hard thermal loops, Phys. Rept. 359, 355 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0101103

    2002 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Jeon, Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativis- tic scalar field theory, Phys

    S. Jeon, Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativis- tic scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3591 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9409250

    1995 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kovtun, D

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Viscos- ity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0405231

    2005 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Buchel, J

    A. Buchel, J. T. Liu, and A. O. Starinets, Coupling con- stant dependence of the shear viscosity in N=4 supersym- metric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 707, 56 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0406264

    2005 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Brigante, H

    M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker, and S. Yaida, Viscosity Bound Violation in Higher Derivative Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 77, 126006 (2008), arXiv:0712.0805 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Cremonini, The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report, Mod

    S. Cremonini, The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 25, 1867 (2011), arXiv:1108.0677 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Grozdanov and A

    S. Grozdanov and A. O. Starinets, On the universal identity in second order hydrodynamics, JHEP 03, 007, arXiv:1412.5685 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Grozdanov and W

    S. Grozdanov and W. van der Schee, Coupling Con- stant Corrections in a Holographic Model of Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 011601 (2017), arXiv:1610.08976 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    S. A. Hartnoll and S. P. Kumar, AdS black holes and thermal Yang-Mills correlators, JHEP 12, 036, arXiv:hep-th/0508092

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of near extremal black branes, Phys. Rev. D66, 124013 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0207133

    2002

  31. [39]

    P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes and holography, Phys. Rev. D72, 086009 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0506184 [hep-th]

    2005 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Christmas tree

    S. Grozdanov and A. O. Starinets, Adding new branches to the “Christmas tree” of the quasinormal spectrum of black branes, JHEP 04, 080, arXiv:1812.09288 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Grozdanov, N

    S. Grozdanov, N. Kaplis, and A. O. Starinets, From strong to weak coupling in holographic models of ther- malization, JHEP 07, 151, arXiv:1605.02173 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Casalderrey-Solana, S

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, S. Grozdanov, and A. O. Starinets, Transport Peak in the Thermal Spectral Func- tion of N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Plasma at Intermediate Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 191603 (2018), arXiv:1806.10997 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Kurkela, U

    A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Flow in AA and pA as an interplay of fluid-like and non-fluid like exci- tations, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 965 (2019), arXiv:1905.05139 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    G. S. Rocha, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Novel Re- laxation Time Approximation to the Relativistic Boltz- mann Equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 042301 (2021), arXiv:2103.07489 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Chen-Lin, L

    X. Chen-Lin, L. V. Delacr´ etaz, and S. A. Hartnoll, The- ory of diffusive fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 091602 (2019), arXiv:1811.12540 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, and L. V. Delacr´ etaz, Corrections to Diffusion in Interacting Quantum Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031020 (2024), arXiv:2310.10564 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Grozdanov, T

    S. Grozdanov, T. Lemut, J. Pelaiˇ c, and A. Soloviev, An- alytic structure of diffusive correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056053 (2024), arXiv:2407.13550 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Biagetti, M

    L. Biagetti, M. Lebek, M. Panfil, and J. D. Nardis, Gen- eralised bbgky hierarchy for near-integrable dynamics (2024), arXiv:2408.00593 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.