Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Observation of superconductivity in a nontrivial $\mathcal{Z}_2$ approximant quasicrystal

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Al13Os4 is claimed to be a bulk superconductor at 5.47 K and a predicted Z2 topological metal, the first quasicrystal approximant to combine both.

desk verdict Solid superconductivity discovery, but the Z2=1 topological claim is not yet justified for a metal with multiple Fermi crossings. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00554 v1 pith:7KWBUTVE submitted 2024-12-31 cond-mat.supr-con

Pavan Kumar Meena , Rahul Verma , Arushi , Sonika Jangid , Roshan Kumar Kushwaha , Rhea Stewart , Adrian D. Hillier , Bahadur Singh
show 1 more author
Ravi Prakash Singh
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords quasicrystalapproximantsuperconductivityZ2topologicalmetalvanHovesingularitymuonspinrotationfirst-principlescalculationsAl13Os4BCSsuperconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that Al13Os4, a monoclinic approximant of the decagonal quasicrystal, becomes a bulk superconductor at 5.47 K and, according to first-principles calculations, is simultaneously a Z2 nontrivial topological metal. If correct, this makes Al13Os4 the first quasicrystal or approximant to show both bulk superconductivity and a predicted nontrivial topological electronic structure, and the highest superconducting transition temperature reported in this class of materials. The authors support the superconducting claim with resistivity, magnetization, specific heat, and muon spin rotation measurements, which point to weak-coupling BCS pairing with preserved time-reversal symmetry. They also identify three-dimensional saddle-point van Hove singularities with substantial flat dispersion near the Fermi level, which they argue can enhance the superconducting instability.

What carries the argument

The central machinery has three parts: (1) the monoclinic C2/m approximant structure made of two quasiperiodic layers, which gives a periodic unit cell on which ordinary band theory can be used; (2) the parity-based Z2 invariant, applied after spin-orbit coupling opens a local gap at every k-point, which yields Z2 = 1 and predicts topological surface states; (3) the three-dimensional saddle-point van Hove singularity at the Fermi level, whose flat dispersion raises the density of states and is argued to enhance superconductivity. The surface states and spin texture are computed from a Wannier-based tight-binding model, while the experimental characterization pins down the superconducting parameters.

What would settle it

Spin-resolved ARPES on the (001) surface should reveal the predicted spin-momentum-locked surface states crossing the Fermi level; their absence would falsify the Z2 = 1 claim. A simpler calculation check: verify that spin-orbit coupling opens a finite gap at every k-point in the Brillouin zone, since the parity product is only defined when such a gap exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Al13Os4 is a bulk, type-II, weak-coupling BCS superconductor with Tc = 5.47(2) K, established by resistivity, magnetization, specific heat, and muon spin rotation measurements; the same compound is, by symmetry and electronic structure analysis, a Z2 nontrivial topological metal with spin-momentum-locked surface states crossing the Fermi level. The paper further identifies three-dimensional saddle-point van Hove singularities with large flat energy dispersion near the Fermi level, which it argues can enhance the superconducting transition temperature, and it reports preserved time-reversal symmetry in the superconducting ground state.

Load-bearing premise

The topological claim depends on treating a metal with several bands crossing the Fermi level as though it were a fully gapped insulator when computing the parity-based Z2 invariant, and on choosing which bands count as valence bands.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Al13Os4 becomes the highest-transition-temperature superconductor reported among quasicrystals and approximants, at 5.47 K with weak-coupling BCS pairing.
  • If the Z2 = 1 assignment holds, the (001) surface should host spin-polarized conducting states that are proximitized by the bulk superconductivity, giving a concrete route to topological superconductivity and possibly Majorana modes in vortex cores.
  • The presence of saddle-point van Hove singularities near the Fermi level implies that shifting the chemical potential by doping or pressure could tune the superconducting transition temperature, making this compound a tunable platform.
  • The fully gapped, clean-limit s-wave gap and preserved time-reversal symmetry measured by muon spin rotation rule out several unconventional pairing scenarios and support phonon-mediated superconductivity in a quasicrystalline approximant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the parity-based topological invariant is accepted for this gapless metal, similar approximants of decagonal quasicrystals containing heavy elements may systematically combine superconductivity and nontrivial topology; scanning other Al–TM approximants would test this prediction.
  • The authors note that the calculated Sommerfeld coefficient is only 60% of the measured value, which could signal stronger mass renormalization than phonons alone; treating the van Hove flat bands with correlated-electron methods may reveal whether the pairing is purely phononic.
  • The topological claim itself is not independently verified by experiment; spin-resolved ARPES on the (001) surface, or an explicit calculation of the invariant that does not rely on a gapped-insulator criterion, would settle whether Al13Os4 is truly Z2 nontrivial.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. Meena et al. report the discovery of superconductivity in the monoclinic decagonal-quasicrystal approximant Al13Os4. The paper presents resistivity, magnetization, specific heat, and muon spin rotation/relaxation data showing a bulk superconducting transition at Tc = 5.47(2) K, a weak-coupling fully gapped superconducting state with gap ratios Δ(0)/kBTc = 1.72(1) and 1.78(6) from specific heat and TF-μSR, respectively, and preserved time-reversal symmetry from ZF-μSR. First-principles calculations are used to propose that the material is a Z2 nontrivial metal with spin-polarized surface states and 3D saddle-point van Hove singularities near the Fermi level. The authors conclude that Al13Os4 is the first decagonal approximant combining bulk superconductivity with nontrivial topology.

Significance. The experimental superconductivity evidence is strong and internally consistent: four independent bulk probes give consistent transition temperatures, the specific-heat and TF-μSR gap ratios agree with each other and with weak-coupling BCS, and ZF-μSR directly addresses the time-reversal-symmetry question. If the topological part is correct, the paper would report the highest Tc among quasicrystals/approximants and a rare combination of bulk superconductivity and nontrivial topology, making Al13Os4 a promising platform for studying proximity-induced topological superconductivity. The DFT work also identifies an interesting saddle-point van Hove structure near Ef. The main weakness is that the Z2=1 claim is not rigorously justified for a gapless metal; this is a load-bearing part of the central claim as stated and needs to be either strengthened or explicitly softened.

major comments (2)
  1. [Electronic structure and topology (Fig. 3(d))] The derivation of Z2=1 is not rigorous for a gapless metal. The text states that four bands γ1–γ4 cross the Fermi level and form open Fermi sheets, so the system has no global gap and no constant number of occupied bands across the Brillouin zone. The Fu–Kane parity criterion [28] is proven for inversion-symmetric insulators, where the occupied subspace is a well-defined vector bundle. A 'continuous bandgap at each k-point' between selected pairs of bands does not define a filled subspace suitable for the parity formula. The authors' own statement that the product gives Z2=1 'when either γ2 or γ3 bands are considered as valence bands' reveals a cutoff dependence, and the table in Fig. 3(d) omits γ4, which also crosses EF. To support this claim, the authors must either compute a well-defined topological invariant for a metal (for example, Wannier charge centers or Wilson loops with an explicit and robust energy window) or provide a rigorous argument that the parity product over all occupied bands is well defined and independent of the arbitrary choice of valence bands. Without this, the nontrivial Z2 and the topological interpretation of the surface states are not established.
  2. [Electronic structure and topology, Figs. 3(f)–(g)] The surface-state interpretation depends on the bulk invariant. In a multi-band metal with open Fermi sheets, surface bands crossing EF can be ordinary surface resonances, and the spin texture alone does not establish a topological origin. The authors should show the projected bulk continuum and demonstrate that the surface crossing is protected (for example, by the bulk invariant or by the number of surface branches at time-reversal invariant momenta). This point is not independent of the first comment, but it should be addressed explicitly if the topological surface-state claim is retained.
minor comments (5)
  1. [μSR results, Eq. (2)] The integrand as typeset ('EdEp') is garbled; it should read E dE / sqrt(E^2 − Δ(T)^2).
  2. [Bulk superconductivity] 'Kadowski-Woods ratio' should be 'Kadowaki-Woods ratio'.
  3. [Summary and discussion] 'decagonal QC approximent' should be 'decagonal QC approximant'.
  4. [μSR results, Fig. 2(f)] The Uemura plot places Al13Os4 close to the unconventional regime, while the text concludes weak-coupling conventional BCS; a sentence explaining that the Uemura classification is heuristic and does not by itself signal unconventional pairing would remove an apparent contradiction.
  5. [Electronic structure and topology, Fig. 3(a)] The band labels are inconsistent between text and figure: the text uses γ1–γ4, while the figure labels include γ0, γ2, and γ4; please harmonize the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental superconducting quantities are benchmarked against independent model fits and mutually consistent probes, and the DFT topology uses an external parity criterion.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce any claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction. The superconducting Tc comes directly from resistivity, magnetization, and specific-heat anomalies, and the two independent gap determinations (specific heat: Delta(0)/kB Tc = 1.72(1); TF-muSR: 1.78(6)) are separate fits to standard BCS expressions, not fits that are then relabeled as predictions. The GL parameters Hc1, Hc2, lambda_GL and xi_GL are extracted from standard Ginzburg-Landau relations against an external benchmark, and the McMillan lambda_e-ph = 0.63(1) is computed from a standard external formula. The first-principles analysis uses VASP, Wannier90, and WannierTools with the Fu-Kane parity criterion [28] as an external reference; no parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted. The calculated Sommerfeld coefficient (12.70 mJ mol^-1 K^-2) is compared with the measured value (21.54) rather than forced to match it, and the resulting lambda_e-ph = 0.69 is presented as a separate consistency check. The only self-citation, Ref. [21], is a general topical review and is not load-bearing. The topological Z2 argument does rest on applying an insulator parity criterion to a gapless metal and on an explicit band-selection choice ('when either gamma2 or gamma3 bands are considered as valence bands'), which is a legitimate correctness/validity concern about the invariant's well-definedness, but it is not a circularity: the parity product is a conditional mathematical computation, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction, and it does not feed back into the experimental superconducting claim. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidentiary bar of this review, and the central superconductivity result is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental side leans on standard BCS, GL, and muSR analysis rather than on author-specific inputs. The theoretical side introduces no new particles or forces but assumes, without proof, that parity-based Z2 invariants extend to a gapless metal with multiple Fermi sheets, and assumes the sample is phase-pure. The listed free parameters are conventional data-fit quantities used to characterize the superconductor.

free parameters (5)
  • Delta(0) from TF-muSR = 0.79(3) meV
    Obtained by fitting sigma_sc(T) to the isotropic s-wave BCS clean-limit expression (Eq. 2); used to conclude weak-coupling BCS with gap ratio 1.78(6).
  • Delta(0)/(kB Tc) from specific heat = 1.72(1)
    Obtained by fitting electronic specific heat with the BCS model; used as evidence for weak coupling. This is a fit, not a parameter-free derivation.
  • Debye temperature theta_D = 340(4) K
    Extracted from the specific heat fit and used in the McMillan formula to estimate lambda_e-ph = 0.63(1); the weak-coupling characterization depends on it.
  • Electron-phonon coupling lambda_e-ph (McMillan) = 0.63(1)
    Derived from theta_D and Tc with an assumed Coulomb pseudopotential; used to characterize coupling strength.
  • Normal-state Sommerfeld coefficient gamma_n = 21.54(7) mJ mol^-1 K^-2
    Extracted from C/T data; compared with DFT gamma_0 to estimate mass renormalization and lambda_e-ph = 0.69.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The Fu-Kane parity criterion for Z2 invariants in inversion-symmetric insulators can be applied to a gapless metal by choosing a subset of bands separated by a local gap.
    Invoked in 'Electronic structure and topology' and Fig. 3(d); the system has multiple Fermi surfaces (bands gamma_1 through gamma_4), so the usual insulator invariant is not automatically well-defined.
  • domain assumption The arc-melted sample is single-phase Al13Os4, and no minority phase contributes the superconducting signals.
    Rietveld refinement is cited, but the main text gives no phase fraction, elemental composition analysis, or superconducting volume fraction; Tc = 5.47 K could in principle come from an uncharacterized impurity phase.
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE DFT with SOC and Wannier downfolding to Os d and Al s,p orbitals gives a reliable description of the bands near E_F and hence the parity products and surface states.
    Method section; the large discrepancy between calculated gamma_0 = 12.70 and measured gamma_n = 21.54 mJ/mol K^2 is acknowledged, showing correlation effects beyond GGA, yet the topological conclusions are drawn from this DFT.
  • domain assumption The isotropic s-wave BCS clean-limit model describes the superconducting gap and penetration depth of Al13Os4.
    Used to fit TF-muSR sigma_sc(T) (Eq. 2) and specific heat; this assumption is part of the evidence for fully gapped weak-coupling superconductivity.
  • domain assumption Muons probe a representative vortex lattice in the powdered sample, and the extracted penetration depth is not biased by muon stopping sites.
    TF-muSR analysis assumes a single sample depolarization channel plus a silver background (Eq. 1); muon site effects are not modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of superconductivity in a nontrivial $\mathcal{Z}_2$ approximant quasicrystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KWBUTVE

@misc{pith2026250100554,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of superconductivity in a nontrivial $\mathcalZ_2$ approximant quasicrystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KWBUTVE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00554}
}
abstract

Superconductivity and nontrivial topology are highly sought-after phenomena in quantum materials. While many topological crystalline materials have been found to exhibit superconductivity, their presence in quasicrystals - materials with a unique aperiodic yet ordered structure - has remained largely unexplored. In this work, we report the discovery of superconductivity in a monoclinic approximant to the decagonal quasicrystal Al$_{13}$Os$_{4}$, that exhibits a high superconducting transition temperature and a nontrivial electronic structure. The resistivity, magnetization, specific heat, and $\mu$SR measurements confirm superconductivity with a critical temperature of $\sim5.47$ K. Detailed electronic structure and symmetry analysis reveal nontrivial state with $\mathcal{Z}_{2}=1$ and spin-polarized conducting surface states. Importantly, we identify three-dimensional saddle point van Hove singularities with substantial flat energy dispersion at the Fermi level, which can enhance superconductivity. Our results highlight a rich interplay between superconductivity and nontrivial electronic states in Al$_{13}$Os$_{4}$, demonstrating it as a unique platform for exploring unconventional superconducting states in quasicrystalline materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00554 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    & Kane, C

    Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007)

    2007

  2. [1]

    & Cahn, J

    Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. & Cahn, J. W. Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984)

    work page 1984

  3. [2]

    Deguchi, K. et al. Quantum critical state in a magnetic quasicrystal. Nat. Mater. 11, 1013 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [3]

    & Krajˇ c ´ ı, M

    Hafner, J. & Krajˇ c ´ ı, M. Electronic structure and stability of quasicrystals: Quasiperiodic disper- sion relations and pseudogaps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2321 (1992)

    work page 1992

  5. [4]

    Nayak, J. et al. Bulk electronic structure of quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 216403 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [5]

    Tamura, R. et al. Experimental observation of long-range magnetic order in icosahedral qua- sicrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19938 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    & Xu, D.-H

    Chen, R., Chen, C.-Z., Gao, J.-H., Zhou, B. & Xu, D.-H. Higher-order topological insulators in quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 036803 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [7]

    & Huang, H

    Fan, J. & Huang, H. Topological states in quasicrystals. Front. Phys. 17, 13203 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    & Tohyama, T

    Ghadimi, R., Sugimoto, T., Tanaka, K. & Tohyama, T. Topological superconductivity in qua- sicrystals. Phys. Rev. B 104, 144511 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    & Arita, R

    Sakai, S. & Arita, R. Exotic pairing state in quasicrystalline superconductors under a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Research 1, 022002 (2019). 11

    2019

  3. [10]

    Ara´ ujo, R. N. & Andrade, E. C. Conventional superconductivity in quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. B 100, 014510 (2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    & Yang, F

    Liu, Y.-B., Zhou, J. & Yang, F. Nematic superconductivity and its critical vestigial phases in the quasi-crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136002 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    & Arita, R

    Sakai, S., Takemori, N., Koga, A. & Arita, R. Superconductivity on a quasiperiodic lattice: Extended-to-localized crossover of cooper pairs. Phys. Rev. B 95, 024509 (2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    Graebner, J. E. & Chen, H. S. Specific heat of an icosahedral superconductor, Mg 3Zn3Al2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1945 (1987)

    1987

  7. [14]

    L., Biggs, B

    Wagner, J. L., Biggs, B. D., Wong, K. M. & Poon, S. J. Specific-heat and transport properties of alloys exhibiting quasicrystalline and crystalline order. Phys. Rev. B 38, 7436 (1988)

    1988

  8. [15]

    Kamiya, K. et al. Discovery of superconductivity in quasicrystal. Nat. Commun. 9, 154 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    Tokumoto, Y. et al. Superconductivity in a van der waals layered quasicrystal. Nat. Commun. 15, 1529 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    Terashima, T. et al. Anomalous upper critical field in the quasicrystal superconductor Ta 1.6Te. npj Quantum Materials 9, 56 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    E., Lahini, Y., Ringel, Z., Verbin, M

    Kraus, Y. E., Lahini, Y., Ringel, Z., Verbin, M. & Zilberberg, O. Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106402 (2012)

    2012

  12. [19]

    Kraus, Y. E. & Zilberberg, O. Topological equivalence between the fibonacci quasicrystal and the harper model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116404 (2012)

    2012

  13. [20]

    D., Azizi, A., Conrad, M., Griffin, S

    Cain, J. D., Azizi, A., Conrad, M., Griffin, S. M. & Zettl, A. Layer-dependent topological phase in a two-dimensional quasicrystal and approximant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 26135 (2020)

    2020

  14. [21]

    & Bansil, A

    Singh, B., Lin, H. & Bansil, A. Topology and symmetry in quantum materials. Advanced Materials 35, 2201058 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    & Steurer, W

    Zhang, B., Gramlich, V. & Steurer, W. Al 13−x(Co1−yNiy)4, a new approximant of the decagonal quasicrystal in the Al-Co-Ni system. Z. Kristallogr 210, 498 (1995)

    1995

  16. [23]

    Z., Shi, N

    Li, X. Z., Shi, N. C., Ma, Z. S., Ma, X. L. & Kuo, K. H. Structure of Al 11Co4, a new monoclinic approximant of the Al-Co decagonal quasicrystal. Philos. Mag. Lett. 72, 79 (1995)

    1995

  17. [24]

    & L¨ uck, R

    Steurer, W., Haibach, T., Zhang, B., Kek, S. & L¨ uck, R. The structure of decagonal Al70Ni15Co15. Acta Cryst. 49, 661 (1993)

    1993

  18. [25]

    Brandt, E. H. Properties of the ideal ginzburg-landau vortex lattice. Phys. Rev. B 68, 054506 (2003)

    2003

  19. [26]

    Devarakonda, A. et al. Clean 2D superconductivity in a bulk van der waals superlattice. Science 370, 231 (2020). 12

    2020

  20. [27]

    Hayano, R. S. et al. Zero-and low-field spin relaxation studied by positive muons. Phys. Rev. B 20, 850 (1979)

    1979

  21. [29]

    Ortiz, B. R. et al. CsV3Sb5: A Z 2 topological kagome metal with a superconducting ground state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 247002 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Zhang, P. et al. Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of an iron-based superconductor. Science 360, 182 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Sasaki, S. et al. Topological superconductivity in Cu xBi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 217001 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Sasaki, S. et al. Odd-parity pairing and topological superconductivity in a strongly spin-orbit coupled semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 217004 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    & Izumi, F

    Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Hillier, A. D. et al. Muon spin spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 4 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    & Sham, L

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  28. [36]

    & Joubert, D

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  29. [37]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  30. [38]

    Mostofi, A. A. et al. wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    & Soluyanov, A

    Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Song, H.-F., Troyer, M. & Soluyanov, A. A. Wanniertools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Sancho, M. P. L., Sancho, J. M. L., Sancho, J. L. & Rubio, J. Highly convergent schemes for the calculation of bulk and surface green functions. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 15, 851 (1985). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS P.K.M. acknowledges the funding agency Council of Scientific and Industrial R...

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.