Yang-Mills Theory From Super Moduli Space

Carlo Alberto Cremonini; Ivo Sachs

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 28 references

Yang-Mills Theory From Super Moduli Space

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that integrating the spinning superparticle world-line path integral over super moduli space yields a spacetime action classically equivalent to Yang-Mills theory, with the quartic vertex arising as a boundary term in…

desk verdict A credible and largely worked-out world-line derivation of kinetic and cubic Yang-Mills vertices, but the quartic vertex—and hence the central equivalence claim—rests on a sign rule imported from string theory rather than derived, so the paper should go to referees with a request to close that gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02927 v2 pith:T2JR5F36 submitted 2025-01-06 hep-th

Carlo Alberto Cremonini , Ivo Sachs This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords supermodulispacespinningsuperparticleYang-Millstheoryworld-linepathintegralBRSTquantizationformspicturechangingoperatorscycliccomplex

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that Yang-Mills theory is an output, not an input, of the spinning superparticle: pulling the world-line path integral back to super moduli space and integrating over the odd directions produces a spacetime action whose kinetic, cubic, and quartic vertices match Yang-Mills theory for a one-form gauge field $A^{[1]}$, with a three-form $A^{[3]}$ appearing as a massless auxiliary field. The construction follows the string field theory prescription, replacing the super Riemann surface by a super world-line so that the odd part of moduli space survives while the world-sheet CFT is replaced by a simpler BRST system. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a point-particle laboratory where the string-theoretic machinery of super moduli space integration, integral forms, and picture changing can be tested off-shell and in detail. The paper also claims that the full Yang-Mills equations already follow from the cubic term once the Lagrange-multiplier fields are eliminated, and that no local vertices beyond quartic order exist by dimension counting on moduli space.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pull-back of the world-line path integral to super moduli space as an integral form, defined as a differential form on a supermanifold that can be integrated even in the odd directions. It is built from the Hamiltonian action $I=\int(p\cdot\dot{x}-\tfrac{1}{2}p^2-\tfrac{i}{4}\psi\cdot\dot{\psi}-i\beta\dot{\gamma}+ib\dot{c})$ and the BRST operator $Q=-cp^2+\gamma\psi\cdot p+b\gamma^2$. Vertices are inserted in two representations of the $\beta\gamma$ system, the polynomial picture-zero representation $1/\gamma$ at one end and the integral-form picture-minus-one representation $\delta(\gamma)$ at the other, so that the $c$ and $\gamma$ zero modes are saturated and the odd moduli are integrated with the Berezinian measure $d\eta\,d(d\eta)$. The mechanism that carries the argument is picture changing by the adjoint action of $e^{iF}$, which shifts the argument of $\delta(\gamma)$ and produces the $dA+\delta A$ and commutator structures of the cubic vertex; at four points, two odd moduli are needed to make the $\tau$ integral a total derivative, reducing the quartic vertex to a boundary contact term. Algebraically, this geometric decomposition is identified with a realization of the cyclic complex.

What would settle it

Compute the four-punctured correlator (3.25) without imposing the s+t channel sign convention; if the boundary terms at $\tau=0$ and $\tau=\epsilon$ do not combine to give $-\frac{1}{2}\int\langle[A,A],[A,A]\rangle$, then the quartic vertex is not Yang-Mills.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the Hamiltonian BRST path integral for the $N=1$ spinning superparticle, when extended to super moduli space and integrated over the odd moduli, yields a space-time action that is classically equivalent to Yang-Mills theory up to boundary terms and additional non-local interactions. The kinetic term comes from the two-point correlator with vertices in the picture-zero and picture-minus-one representations of the $\beta\gamma$ system; the cubic term comes from the single odd modulus of the three-punctured line; and the quartic term comes from the four-punctured line, where integration over the two odd moduli turns the bosonic modulus integral into a total derivative, leaving only a boundary contact term. Summing the s- and t-channel arrangements of the four punctures, with a relative sign inherited from time-ordering, antisymmetrizes the quartic expression into the standard Yang-Mills vertex. The three-form $A^{[3]}$ is not an independent propagating field: it is sourced by $A^{[1]}$ and acts as a massless auxiliary field, whose elimination gives non-local corrections to the Yang-Mills equations.

Load-bearing premise

The quartic Yang-Mills vertex depends on the imported string-theory rule that the s- and t-channel contributions are summed with a relative sign from moving one puncture past the other; this rule is assumed, not derived from the world-line path integral.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The world-line path integral integrated over odd moduli gives the kinetic, cubic, and quartic vertices of Yang-Mills theory for $A^{[1]}$, with $A^{[3]}$ as a massless auxiliary field.
The full non-linear Yang-Mills equations follow already from the cubic action after varying the Lagrange multipliers $B^{[\bullet]}$, so the quartic term is consistent with, but not needed for, the equations of motion.
There are no local vertices of order higher than four, because each additional puncture adds one bosonic and one fermionic modulus, and two fermionic moduli are required to produce a total derivative in the bosonic modulus.
In the background-field formulation, the odd-moduli integration is encoded in a deformation of the world-line Hamiltonian, yielding the background BRST operator $Q(A)=-c[(p-\hat{A})^2+\tfrac{i}{2}F(A)]+\gamma\psi\cdot(p-\hat{A})+b\gamma^2$.
The resulting space-time functional is classically equivalent to Yang-Mills theory up to boundary terms and non-local interactions induced by the massless three-form.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: if the s/t-channel sign rule is universal, the same mechanism of two odd moduli turning a bosonic modulus integral into a boundary term should produce quartic contact terms in any world-line derivation of an effective action, giving a sharp criterion for locality.
Editorial extension: the counting argument that forbids vertices beyond quartic order suggests a testable prediction, namely that the five-point world-line correlator should vanish or reduce to non-local terms after integration over its moduli.
Editorial extension: applying the same super-moduli pullback to extended spinning particles, such as the $N=2$ or $N=4$ models the authors signal for future work, would likely produce gravity-like actions with auxiliary higher forms playing the same massless role.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things about this paper before reading it. First, it does deliver a real construction: the Hamiltonian pull-back of the spinning superparticle path integral to super moduli space, with integration over odd moduli producing kinetic and cubic Yang-Mills vertices, a quartic contact term from the odd-modulus integration, and a clean cyclic-complex interpretation. Second, the quartic step has a load-bearing gap: the term obtained in Eq. (3.31) is explicitly not the Yang-Mills quartic vertex, and the repair is a sign rule imported from string theory, not derived from the world-line path integral. So the advertised result—classical equivalence to Yang-Mills—is conditional, not established.

What is genuinely good: the quadratic and cubic sectors are computed in detail. The BRST differential, the auxiliary B-field equations, the gauge transformations, and the degree-of-freedom count are all consistent. The observation that the cubic equations already imply the full nonlinear Yang-Mills equation after eliminating B (up to non-local corrections from the 3-form A[3]) is solid, and the counting argument that no local higher-order vertices survive is plausible. The background-field section is also attractive: it produces a manifestly background-independent BRST operator Q(A) that is nilpotent without imposing the equations of motion, and it connects naturally to earlier spinning-particle work [25-27]. The paper is honestly written about its own limits—it flags the non-local corrections, the boundary terms, and the absence of space-time supersymmetry.

The soft spots are concentrated in Section 3.5. The coefficient # in Eq. (3.30) is fixed by gauge invariance rather than computed. The limit epsilon -> 0 is justified only as 'sufficient for gauge invariance,' not by controlling the discarded non-local terms. And the s+t channel sum is the heart of the problem: the text says the t-channel is a cyclic permutation followed by moving s_infinity to the left of s_-infinity, which gives a relative sign in the fermion propagator. But on a single fixed world-line, punctures have a definite time order, and the authors do not show that this reordering is a gauge or modular transformation of that configuration. In string theory, s and t channels come from different boundary components of moduli space; no analogous boundary analysis is given here. If that sign is wrong, (3.34) does not follow and the action contains the non-Yang-Mills quartic term (3.31). This is a mechanical gap, not necessarily an error—the derivation may be completable—but it is exactly where a referee should push.

Also worth noting: the field content is chosen because it is 'the same class as Yang-Mills theory' (Section 2.2), which is a mild circularity. That would worry me more if the kinetic and cubic terms were fitted, but they are computed, so it is acceptable. The citation pattern is fine; the relevant spinning-particle and supermoduli-space literature is present, and self-citations are to prior work that is reasonably connected.

Who is this for? People working on supermoduli space, world-line approaches to Yang-Mills amplitudes and actions, and background-independent string field theory. They will get a useful, concrete laboratory for techniques, even if the final claim needs tightening. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it to peer review, and ask the authors to derive the quartic coefficient and the channel-combining sign from the world-line integral, or to justify the boundary decomposition of moduli space explicitly. Conditional accept, not reject.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper constructs the pull-back of the spinning superparticle world-line path integral to super moduli space in the Hamiltonian BRST formulation, following the strategy used in superstring field theory. The authors derive the quadratic and cubic terms in the space-time action by inserting off-shell states at punctures and integrating over the odd moduli. They then propose a quartic vertex obtained as a boundary term in a bosonic modulus after integrating out two odd moduli. The claimed result is a space-time action that is classically equivalent to Yang-Mills theory for a one-form A[1], with a three-form A[3] acting as a massless auxiliary field, up to boundary terms and non-local corrections. A background-field formulation is also presented, in which the same world-line data yields a background-dependent BRST operator. The paper also describes a geometric decomposition of super moduli space and argues that no local vertices of degree higher than four exist.

Significance. The construction is novel and potentially important: it gives a world-line derivation of the Yang-Mills vertices from super moduli space, and the observation that the two odd moduli turn the quartic vertex into a boundary term is elegant. The paper contains explicit computations of the kinetic and cubic terms, including the BRST differential and auxiliary field equations, and the counting argument excluding higher local vertices is concrete. If the quartic vertex derivation can be made rigorous, this would be a significant step toward understanding the relation between world-line field theory and Yang-Mills theory, and it provides a toy model for superstring field theory constructions. However, as it stands, the central claim depends on an unverified assumption in the quartic sector, which limits the force of the paper.

major comments (4)

[3.5 (Eqs. (3.31)-(3.34))] The quartic vertex is not derived from the world-line path integral. The text first obtains the term (3.31), states that it 'does not reproduce the expected quartic term for Yang-Mills theory,' and then replaces it by (3.34) using the assertion that 'in string theory the t and s-channel contributions come from different regions in moduli space.' The t-channel operation is described as a cyclic permutation followed by moving s∞ to the left of s−∞, which is said to imply a relative sign in the fermion propagator. On the fixed world-line, the punctures have a definite time order, and this reordering is not shown to correspond to a boundary component of the world-line moduli space or to a gauge/modular transformation. The string-theoretic s/t-channel split follows from the boundary structure of the moduli space of a four-punctured surface; no analogous boundary analysis is supplied here. The step that produces the Yang-Mills quartic coupling is therefore an imported assumption rather than a computed result.
[3.5 (Eq. (3.30))] The coefficient # of the quartic term is not computed from the path integral. The text says 'We will simply fix the coefficient to be compatible with the gauge invariance of the action.' Since the coefficient is fixed by demanding the desired Yang-Mills gauge invariance, the derivation is partly circular: the target action is used to set the coefficient. Because the quartic term is essential to the claimed Yang-Mills equivalence, this gap must be closed by an explicit evaluation of the coefficient from the measure and parametrization of the super moduli space.
[3.5 (limit epsilon -> 0)] The limit ε→0 is taken because it is 'sufficient for gauge invariance,' and otherwise the vertex would give non-local contributions. This limit discards potentially non-local terms without a controlled expansion or error estimate. The reduction of the quartic vertex to a local contact term is crucial for the claim that the action is Yang-Mills, but the text does not justify ε→0 as a limit of the world-line path integral; it is imposed to enforce locality. A careful treatment of the boundary contributions in the bosonic modulus τ is required.
[3.2 (Eq. (3.16))] The derivation of the Yang-Mills equation from the cubic action is only sketched. The text states that acting with the adjoint de Rham differential δ on the third line of (3.14) gives D_α F^{αμ} + ... = 0, with unspecified non-local corrections from A[3]. Since the abstract claims the action is classically equivalent to Yang-Mills, the precise form of these corrections and the sense in which they are negligible should be explained. Without this, the 'equivalence' remains qualitative.

minor comments (6)

[2.2 (Eq. (2.6))] The supercharge q is used in the action before it is defined; define q = ψ·p + 2bγ at first use.
[3.1 (Eq. (3.3))] There is a typo in the second line: 'V(s∞), =' should be 'V(s∞) ='.
[3.3 (Eq. (3.21))] The symbols f0 and f1 are used but not defined explicitly; the reader must infer they are the values of the odd gauge parameter at the corresponding punctures.
[Abstract] The abstract mentions 'the cyclic complex' without defining it; a brief definition or reference should be added in the main text.
[2.2] The restriction to four-dimensional flat space is stated, but no comment is made on how the analysis generalizes to other dimensions; since the construction is anomaly-free, a short remark would be helpful.
[Title page] The affiliation line contains a typo: 'Ludwi g-Maximilians-Universit¨ at' should be 'Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The quartic Yang-Mills vertex required for the central equivalence claim is not derived: its coefficient is 'simply fixed' by gauge invariance and its tensor structure is obtained only after importing an s/t-channel sign rule from string theory, so the target action supplies the answer.

fitted input called prediction [Section 3.5, Eq. (3.30)]
"We will simply ﬁx the coeﬃcient to be compatible with the gauge invariance of the action. After integration over moduli space this results in a term proportional to ⟨A,A,A,A ⟩ = 1 2 ⟨A, [A,A ],A ⟩ + ⟨A,A 2,A ⟩, which does not reproduce the expected quartic term for Yang-Mills theory."

The quartic coefficient # in Eq. (3.30) is not computed from the world-line path integral; it is set to whatever value is needed for gauge invariance. The tensor structure produced by the integral is then explicitly compared with the 'expected quartic term for Yang-Mills theory' and, when it does not match, the mismatch is treated as a problem to be repaired rather than as the actual output. Thus the Yang-Mills quartic vertex is an input used to fix the free coefficient, not a prediction.
other [Section 3.5, Eqs. (3.32)-(3.34)]
"The t-channel thus corresponds to a cyclic permutation of the s-channel followed by a permutation of V1 and V3. On the time-ordered world-line, the latter operation amounts to moving s∞ to the left of s−∞ which implies a relative sign in the fermion propagator. Thus, summing over the s and t channels amounts to antisymmetrizing in the in and out states."

The relative sign that converts the non-Yang-Mills expression (3.31) into the Yang-Mills expression (3.34) is imported from string-theory intuition about s/t channels. On a fixed four-punctured world-line the time order is fixed, and the paper gives no derivation, no moduli-space boundary analysis, and no symmetry argument showing that moving s∞ to the left of s−∞ is an allowed operation or that it produces the required sign. The only stated reason is that the operation 'implies' the sign, i.e. the sign needed to match the target Yang-Mills vertex. Eq. (3.34) is therefore asserted to be the quartic term, not derived.

full rationale

Most of the derivation is self-contained: the quadratic and cubic terms are computed from world-line correlators, and the third line of (3.14) genuinely yields a Yang-Mills-type equation (with non-local A[3] corrections) after variation with respect to the Lagrange multiplier B. The choice of field content is motivated by the statement that it is 'the same class as Yang-Mills theory,' but that is a choice of input, not by itself a circular reduction. The self-citations in the paper are contextual rather than load-bearing. The circularity is concentrated in the quartic vertex of Section 3.5, which the central claim requires. There the coefficient is 'simply fixed' by gauge invariance, the raw quartic expression is acknowledged not to reproduce the expected Yang-Mills term, and the Yang-Mills tensor structure is obtained only by importing an s/t-channel sign rule whose sole justification is that it yields the desired sign. Since the advertised equivalence to Yang-Mills depends on this quartic vertex, the quartic equivalence reduces by construction to a fitted coefficient plus a handpicked sign rule; the kinetic and cubic content remain independent. Score 6 reflects this partial circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard supergeometry and BRST quantization inputs plus a number of modeling choices. The main load-bearing assumptions are the off-shell BRST structure, the moduli counting for the punctured super world-line, and the representation choices for the beta-gamma system. The quartic coefficient # is the only explicit hand-fixed parameter I identified; the channel-summing rule is introduced without independent derivation. No new physical particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)

quartic coefficient # = fixed by gauge invariance, not numerically computed
In Eq. (3.30), C4^(0,1) carries an undetermined coefficient # that depends on parametrizations of F0 and F_epsilon. The authors state 'We will simply fix the coefficient to be compatible with the gauge invariance of the action', so the final quartic Yang-Mills vertex is partly an input rather than a computed output.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The BRST operator Q = -c p^2 + gamma psi dot p + b gamma^2 with action (2.7) provides the correct off-shell quantization of the N=1 spinning superparticle, and there is no conformal anomaly.
Invoked throughout Section 2.2. The authors note the flat-space and 4d restrictions can be lifted, but the off-shell BRST structure is load-bearing for the whole construction.
domain assumption The moduli count for the punctured super world-line is as stated: 3 punctures have one odd modulus and no even modulus; 4 punctures have one even and two odd moduli available after accounting for automorphisms and excluded vector fields.
This counting in Sections 2.1 and 3.5 drives the absence of local vertices beyond quartic order and the total-derivative mechanism that makes the quartic vertex a contact term.
standard math The measure [d eta d(d eta)] is the natural Berezinian on super moduli space, and the f-prime Jacobian cancellation in Eq. (3.7) is valid.
Used to define integration over the odd modulus. The authors cite supermanifold integration theory, e.g. [24], for this step.
domain assumption The contraction identities for the world-line path integral produce the stated de Rham operations, in particular {p, A} = -i delta A in the state picture used for Eq. (3.12).
This identification is central to converting the cubic term into the Yang-Mills-like expression with dA plus delta A, and it relies on the sign-function correlation (2.9).
standard math Distribution identities such as delta(gamma)^2 = 0 and the shifts of delta(gamma - f) under picture changing are used without additional regularization.
These identities are needed in Sections 3.3 and 3.5 to kill the tau = 0 boundary contribution and to evaluate the associator.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Yang-Mills Theory From Super Moduli Space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T2JR5F36

@misc{pith2026250102927,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Yang-Mills Theory From Super Moduli Space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T2JR5F36}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02927}
}

read the original abstract

For the spinning superparticle we construct the pull-back of the world-line path integral to super moduli space in the Hamiltonian formulation. We describe the underlying geometric decomposition of super moduli space. Algebraically, this gives a realization of the cyclic complex. The resulting space-time action is classically equivalent to Yang-Mills theory up to boundary terms and additional non-local interactions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[3]

Berkovits, SuperPoincare invariant superstring ﬁeld theory , Nucl

N. Berkovits, SuperPoincare invariant superstring ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B 450 (1995) 90–102 [ hep-th/9503099]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 459, 439–451 (1996)]

arXiv 1995
[1]

Belopolsky, Picture changing operators in supergeometry and superstri ng theory , hep-th/9706033

A. Belopolsky, Picture changing operators in supergeometry and superstri ng theory , hep-th/9706033

arXiv
[2]

Witten, Notes On Supermanifolds and Integration , 1209.2199

E. Witten, Notes On Supermanifolds and Integration , 1209.2199

arXiv
[4]

Erler, S

T. Erler, S. Konopka and I. Sachs, Resolving Witten‘s superstring ﬁeld theory , JHEP 04 (2014) 150 [ 1312.2948]

arXiv 2014
[5]

Erler, Y

T. Erler, Y. Okawa and T. Takezaki, A∞ structure from the Berkovits formulation of open superstring ﬁeld theory , 1505.01659

arXiv
[6]

Relating Berkovits and $A_\infty$ Superstring Field Theories; Large Hilbert Space Perspective

T. Erler, Relating Berkovits and A∞ superstring ﬁeld theories; large Hilbert space perspectiv e, JHEP 02 (2016) 121 [ 1510.00364]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[7]

Sen, BV Master Action for Heterotic and Type II String Field Theor ies, JHEP 02 (2016) 087 [ 1508.05387]

A. Sen, BV Master Action for Heterotic and Type II String Field Theor ies, JHEP 02 (2016) 087 [ 1508.05387]

arXiv 2016
[8]

Donagi and E

R. Donagi and E. Witten, Supermoduli Space Is Not Projected , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 90 (2015) 19–72 [ 1304.7798]

arXiv 2015

Show all 28 references

[9]

Ohmori and Y

K. Ohmori and Y. Okawa, Open superstring ﬁeld theory based on the supermoduli space , JHEP 04 (2018) 035 [ 1703.08214]

2018 arXiv
[10]

Wang and X

C. Wang and X. Yin, On the equivalence between SRS and PCO formulations of super string perturbation theory, JHEP 03 (2023) 139 [ 2205.01106]

2023 arXiv
[11]

C. A. Cremonini, The geometry of picture changing operators , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 28 (2024), no. 2 655–677 [ 2305.02828]

2024 arXiv
[12]

Sen and E

A. Sen and E. Witten, Filling the gaps with PCO’s , JHEP 09 (2015) 004 [ 1504.00609]

2015 arXiv
[13]

Berkovits and M

N. Berkovits and M. Schnabl, Yang-Mills action from open superstring ﬁeld theory , JHEP 09 (2003) 022 [ hep-th/0307019]. – 19 –

2003 arXiv
[14]

Witten, On background independent open string ﬁeld theory , Phys

E. Witten, On background independent open string ﬁeld theory , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5467–5473 [ hep-th/9208027]

1992 arXiv
[15]

S. L. Shatashvili, On the problems with background independence in string theo ry, Alg. Anal. 6 (1994) 215–226 [ hep-th/9311177]

1994 arXiv
[16]

Chiaﬀrino and I

C. Chiaﬀrino and I. Sachs, Classical open string amplitudes from boundary string ﬁeld theory, JHEP 06 (2019) 086 [ 1805.07084]

2019 arXiv
[17]

A. A. Tseytlin, Sigma model approach to string theory eﬀective actions with tachyons, J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 2854–2871 [ hep-th/0011033]

2001 arXiv
[18]

V. A. Kostelecky, M. Perry and R. Potting, Oﬀ-shell structure of the string sigma model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4541–4544 [ hep-th/9912243]

2000 arXiv
[19]

Ahmadain and A

A. Ahmadain and A. C. Wall, Oﬀ-shell strings I: S-matrix and action , SciPost Phys. 17 (2024), no. 1 005 [ 2211.08607]

2024 arXiv
[20]

Sen and B

A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, Quantum background independence of closed string ﬁeld theo ry, Nucl. Phys. B 423 (1994) 580–630 [ hep-th/9311009]

1994 arXiv
[21]

Muenster and I

K. Muenster and I. Sachs, Homotopy Classiﬁcation of Bosonic String Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 330 (2014) 1227–1262 [ 1208.5626]

2014 arXiv
[22]

Sen, Background Independence of Closed Superstring Field Theor y, JHEP 02 (2018) 155 [1711.08468]

A. Sen, Background Independence of Closed Superstring Field Theor y, JHEP 02 (2018) 155 [1711.08468]

2018 arXiv
[23]

Zwiebach, Closed string ﬁeld theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation, Nucl

B. Zwiebach, Closed string ﬁeld theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation, Nucl. Phys. B390 (1993) 33–152 [ hep-th/9206084]

1993 arXiv
[24]

Witten, Superstring Perturbation Theory Revisited , 1209.5461

E. Witten, Superstring Perturbation Theory Revisited , 1209.5461

arXiv
[25]

Dai, Y.-t

P. Dai, Y.-t. Huang and W. Siegel, Worldgraph Approach to Yang-Mills Amplitudes from N=2 Spinning Particle , JHEP 10 (2008) 027 [ 0807.0391]

2008 arXiv
[26]

Bonezzi, A

R. Bonezzi, A. Meyer and I. Sachs, Einstein gravity from the N = 4 spinning particle, JHEP 10 (2018) 025 [ 1807.07989]

2018 arXiv
[27]

Bonezzi, A

R. Bonezzi, A. Meyer and I. Sachs, A Worldline Theory for Supergravity , JHEP 06 (2020) 103 [ 2004.06129]

2020 arXiv
[28]

Grigoriev, A

M. Grigoriev, A. Meyer and I. Sachs, A toy model for background independent string ﬁeld theory, JHEP 05 (2022) 020 [ 2106.07966]. – 20 –

2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [3]

Berkovits, SuperPoincare invariant superstring ﬁeld theory , Nucl

N. Berkovits, SuperPoincare invariant superstring ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B 450 (1995) 90–102 [ hep-th/9503099]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 459, 439–451 (1996)]

arXiv 1995

[2] [1]

Belopolsky, Picture changing operators in supergeometry and superstri ng theory , hep-th/9706033

A. Belopolsky, Picture changing operators in supergeometry and superstri ng theory , hep-th/9706033

arXiv

[3] [2]

Witten, Notes On Supermanifolds and Integration , 1209.2199

E. Witten, Notes On Supermanifolds and Integration , 1209.2199

arXiv

[4] [4]

Erler, S

T. Erler, S. Konopka and I. Sachs, Resolving Witten‘s superstring ﬁeld theory , JHEP 04 (2014) 150 [ 1312.2948]

arXiv 2014

[5] [5]

Erler, Y

T. Erler, Y. Okawa and T. Takezaki, A∞ structure from the Berkovits formulation of open superstring ﬁeld theory , 1505.01659

arXiv

[6] [6]

Relating Berkovits and $A_\infty$ Superstring Field Theories; Large Hilbert Space Perspective

T. Erler, Relating Berkovits and A∞ superstring ﬁeld theories; large Hilbert space perspectiv e, JHEP 02 (2016) 121 [ 1510.00364]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016

[7] [7]

Sen, BV Master Action for Heterotic and Type II String Field Theor ies, JHEP 02 (2016) 087 [ 1508.05387]

A. Sen, BV Master Action for Heterotic and Type II String Field Theor ies, JHEP 02 (2016) 087 [ 1508.05387]

arXiv 2016

[8] [8]

Donagi and E

R. Donagi and E. Witten, Supermoduli Space Is Not Projected , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 90 (2015) 19–72 [ 1304.7798]

arXiv 2015