Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Diffusion in Quenched Random Environments: Reviving Laplace's First Law of Errors

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Disorder can't erase Laplace's exponential diffusion tails

desk verdict Solid lower-bound derivation and convincing numerics, but the claimed identity in Eq. (12) needs a proof of the upper-bound monotonicity or a softer claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05585 v1 pith:SYDBC7YK submitted 2025-01-09 cond-mat.stat-mech

Lucianno Defaveri , Eli Barkai This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 60K3782C3182C44 PACS 05.40.Fb05.60.-k
keywords Laplace'sfirstlawexponentialtailstrapmodelquencheddisorderlargedeviationsrandomwalkanomalousdiffusiondisorder-averagedpropagator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to prove that Laplace's first law of errors—the exponential decay of error frequencies—survives when diffusion happens in a frozen, disordered environment, not just in renewal or mean-field models. Working in a one-dimensional trap model where every site has its own fixed escape rate, the authors show from below and above that the disorder-averaged packet $\langle P(x,t)\rangle$ decays, for large displacement $|x|$ at fixed time, exactly like the ordered lattice: exponentially, with a logarithmic correction. The decay rate is set only by the mean and variance of the random rates, so the result is the same for exponential, Gaussian, or uniform trap-energy densities. If correct, this supplies the missing bridge between the widely observed exponential tails in single-particle tracking and a genuinely quenched random environment.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the direct-path probability $\mathrm{Prob}(\to)$, the probability that a walker reaches $x$ by moving right at every step without ever turning back. Because a direct path visits each site once, its waiting times are independent even in a quenched environment, so its disorder-averaged Laplace transform factorizes as $\langle\widehat{\psi}(s)\rangle^{x}(1-\langle\widehat{\psi}(s)\rangle)/s$, where $\langle\widehat{\psi}(s)\rangle=\langle R/(R+s)\rangle$ is the Laplace transform of the averaged waiting-time density. Evaluating this by saddle point at $s^*=x/t$ converts the product into the exponential tail with moments $\langle R\rangle$ and $\langle R^2\rangle$. The paper then adds the single-turn paths, whose Laplace transforms contain $\langle\widehat{\psi}(s)^2\rangle$ because a revisited site must reuse the same random rate; these are down by one power of $1/x$ and give the correction series in Eq. (16).

What would settle it

Numerically compute the ratio in Eq. (12) for exponential trap-energy disorder with $T$ just above $T_g$, pushing to very large $|x|$ with rare-event sampling or by exact evaluation of path sums; a limiting ratio strictly below 1 while the limsup is 1 would falsify the identity. Alternatively, test the asserted inequality $\langle P(x,t)\rangle < e^{-rt}I_{|x|}(rt)$ directly at $T=T_g/2$; a single violation would show the upper-bound argument, and therefore the derivation of the liminf, needs another proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the quenched disorder average satisfies $$\lim_{|x|\to\infty}\frac{-\ln\langle P(x,t)\rangle}{|x|\ln(2|x|/(e\langle R\rangle t))}=1,$$ so the packet has a Laplace-like tail independent of the density of states $\rho(E)$. The lower-bound half is derived: the direct, never-backtracking path contributes $$\langle \mathrm{Prob}(\to)\rangle \sim \frac{$e^{{-\langle R^2\rangle t/\langle R\rangle}}$}{\sqrt{2\pi|x|}}\left(\frac{e\langle R\rangle t}{2|x|}\right)^{|x|},$$ from a saddle point on the disorder-averaged waiting-time Laplace transform; this requires only $\langle R\rangle$ and $\langle R^2\rangle$. Single-turn backtracking paths add $1/|x|$ corrections involving $\langle R^3\rangle$, which capture the correlations created when a particle revisits a trap. Against this, the ordered infinite-temperature system provides an exponential upper bound, and the two bounds squeeze the packet into the same universal tail.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's upper bound assumes, without a proof, that for large $x$ the disordered packet is smaller than the ordered one, $\langle P(x,t)\rangle<P_{\mathrm{ordered}}(x,t)$, because every rate is at most $r$; if this monotonicity ever fails, the identity in Eq. (12) is only a lower bound.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any trap-energy density $\rho(E)$ with finite $\langle R\rangle$ and $\langle R^2\rangle$, the large-$|x|$ tail has the same functional form; temperature and disorder change only the prefactor through $\langle R^2\rangle/\langle R\rangle$ and the logarithmic scale $\langle R\rangle t$.
  • Because the tail shape is insensitive to $\rho(E)$, exponential displacement tails in experiments cannot by themselves identify the microscopic trap statistics.
  • Backtracking paths contribute only at order $1/x$, so direct paths dominate the far tail; the $1/x$ corrections carry the quenched-disorder correlation signature in the packet.
  • The result holds even in the anomalous-diffusion regime of exponential disorder with $T<T_g$, where the mean-square displacement is $\langle x^2\rangle\sim t^{T/T_g}$; the Laplace tail and the central Gaussian-like region coexist.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same direct-path lower bound should hold in higher dimensions and for biased hopping, since the factorization argument only needs the path not to revisit sites; I would expect the same log-normalized limit with $\langle R\rangle$ replaced by the directional average rate.
  • Beyond the paper: the appearance of only $\langle R\rangle$ and $\langle R^2\rangle$ suggests the tail can be read as a large-deviation rate function for the empirical mean of $\ln R$ along the path; proving this would connect Eq. (12) to standard large-deviation theory for products of random variables.
  • Beyond the paper: if the ordered-system upper bound can be replaced by a stochastic-ordering proof, the identity in Eq. (12) becomes a theorem rather than a physically argued identity; testing the inequality for intermediate temperatures and short times would show where such a proof must work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. Using a one-dimensional quenched trap model with independent, identically distributed rates drawn from a density of states ρ(E), the paper studies the large-displacement tail of the disorder-averaged propagator ⟨P(x,t)⟩. It derives a lower bound from directed paths, whose disorder-averaged Laplace transform is evaluated by a saddle-point method, yielding the Laplace-like form in Eq. (10). It proposes an upper bound by comparison with the ordered system in which all rates equal the maximal rate r. Single-turn backtracking paths are then added to produce the improved lower bound in Eq. (16), with explicit 1/x corrections depending on the first three moments of the rates. Numerical simulations for exponential, Gaussian, and uniform densities of states are compared with Eq. (16). The central claim is Eq. (12): the ratio -ln⟨P(x,t)⟩/[|x| ln(2|x|/(e⟨R⟩t))] tends to 1, so the packet tail is a universal Laplace-like law whose constants are set by moments of the escape rates.

Significance. If fully established, the result would extend Laplace's first law of errors from CTRW mean-field models to quenched, spatially correlated disorder, and would connect the phenomenon to the density of states through moments of the escape rates. The paper's strengths are its explicit saddle-point calculations in the Supplemental Material, the absence of fitted parameters in the theoretical curves, and numerical tests across several disorder families, including the anomalous T<Tg exponential case. The improved lower bound in Eq. (16) is a practically useful finite-x handle for comparing with experiments. The main caveat is that the exact equality in Eq. (12) is not fully proven; the lower-bound and upper-bound arguments establish the two sides of the sandwich only if the unproved ordering against the ordered system holds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Lower bound, Eq. (12)] Equation (12) states the limit is ≥1 and attributes this to Eq. (10). Because Eq. (10) is a lower bound on ⟨P(x,t)⟩, it gives -ln⟨P⟩ ≤ -ln⟨Prob(→)⟩, so the ratio in Eq. (12) is asymptotically ≤1, not ≥1. The ≥1 direction is what would follow from the upper bound against P_ordered. The inequality direction, or its attribution, should be corrected; as printed, the logical support for Eq. (12) is inverted.
  2. [Upper bound, paragraph after Fig. 2] The assertion 'for large x, ⟨P(x,t)⟩ < P_ordered(x,t)' is load-bearing: it supplies the liminf ≥1 half of Eq. (12) and hence the claimed equality. No coupling, stochastic-ordering, or other rigorous argument is given; the physical intuition about short waiting times is not a proof, especially because a deep trap at the destination can locally increase the occupation probability. Please provide a rigorous argument, for example a per-site Poisson-thinning coupling followed by a large-deviation estimate, or explicitly weaken the central claim to a conjecture stated as such.
  3. [Identity claim, after Eq. (12)] The statement that Eq. (12) is an identity because the direct path dominates for large x is presented only as 'we argue' and 'we expect'. This is a separate, unproved asymptotic equivalence. The single-turn corrections and numerical evidence make it plausible, but they do not exclude the possibility that the accumulated contributions of paths with many backtracking events alter the leading exponent. Either prove the dominance by bounding the total contribution of all non-direct paths, or state Eq. (12) as a conjecture supported by the bounds and numerics.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (15) and SM Eq. (SM69)] There is an inconsistency in the denominator of the single-turn contribution: main-text Eq. (15) has (2⟨R⟩|x|)^2, while the Supplemental Material Eq. (SM69) appears to have (2⟨R⟩x^2)^2. The O(1/x) correction in Eq. (16) confirms the main-text version; please correct the SM typo.
  2. [Eq. (6) and SM Eq. (SM10)] The indicator in Eq. (6) has the upper limit Σ_{i=0}^x τ_{i+1}; the correct condition is t_x = Σ_{i=0}^x τ_i, which is what is used in Eq. (SM14). Please fix the typo in the displayed expression.
  3. [Abstract and references] There are several typos: 'isordered' in the abstract, 'Bertheir' for 'Berthier' in the second paragraph, and 'appoach' in reference [64].
  4. [Eq. (9) and SM notation] The notation '[Prob(→)' for the Laplace transform is introduced without a definition in the main text; please define the bracket notation before first use, or replace it with an explicitly defined symbol.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'the lower bound always saturates' is unclear; it presumably means that the simulated packet approaches the lower bound at large x, but the wording should be made precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the trap-model bounds are derived from the master equation; the unproved upper-bound monotonicity is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The lower bound starts from the exact disorder-averaged direct-path probability, Eq. (9), obtained by Laplace transforming Eq. (6) under the model's exponential waiting times; Eqs. (10) and (16) are saddle-point asymptotics of that exact expression. The constants ⟨R^q⟩ enter through Eq. (11) as Laplace transforms of the chosen ρ(E), and the figures compare these analytic moments with simulations of the same model, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only load-bearing step not proven is the upper-bound monotonicity asserted after Fig. 2: 'for large x, ⟨P(x,t)⟩ < P_ordered(x,t)'. This assertion underlies the liminf side of the claimed identity in Eq. (12), so the equality in Eq. (12) is not fully established; however, that is a missing stochastic-ordering proof and a correctness risk, not a circular argument, because P_ordered is an independent ordered-system solution and the assertion does not assume Eq. (12). Self-citations [41-43] motivate the Laplace-law context but are not used to derive the bounds. The paper explicitly labels the step from Eq. (12)'s inequality to identity with 'we argue' and 'we expect', and the numerical evidence is presented as support rather than as the derivation. No circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the trap-model idealization and on two unproven premises: the upper-bound monotonicity and, for the identity version of Eq. (12), direct-path dominance. The moments <R^q> are model inputs computed from rho(E) and T, not fit parameters; no parameters are adjusted to match the numerics. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The tracer dynamics are governed by the master equation (1) with iid quenched rates R_x drawn from a common density f(R).
    The paper's entire result is conditional on this trap-model representation of quenched disorder; no microscopic derivation from a specific physical system is given.
  • domain assumption The escape rates are bounded above by the microscopic rate r (Arrhenius law with E>0), so the ordered system at rate r is the fastest possible environment.
    Used to justify the upper bound <P> < P_ordered in the 'Upper bound' paragraph; this limits the claimed universality to thermal trap models with non-negative trap depths.
  • ad hoc to paper For large x, the ordered-system probability dominates the disordered packet: <P(x,t)> < P_ordered(x,t).
    Asserted without proof in the upper bound section; no stochastic monotonicity theorem or coupling construction is provided. The limit in Eq. (12) relies on this inequality.
  • standard math The saddle-point approximation gives the correct large-x asymptotics of the Laplace inversion.
    Standard steepest-descent argument detailed in the SM; accepted as rigorous enough for the claimed order of expansion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diffusion in Quenched Random Environments: Reviving Laplace's First Law of Errors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SYDBC7YK

@misc{pith2026250105585,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diffusion in Quenched Random Environments: Reviving Laplace's First Law of Errors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SYDBC7YK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05585}
}
abstract

Laplace's first law of errors, which states that the frequency of an error can be represented as an exponential function of the error magnitude, was overlooked for many decades but was recently shown to describe the statistical behavior of diffusive tracers in isordered, glassy-like media. While much is known about this behavior, a key ingredient is still missing: the relationship between this observation and diffusion in a quenched random environment. We address this problem using the trap model, deriving lower and upper bounds on the particle packet for large displacements. Our results demonstrate that both bounds exhibit Laplace-like laws. We further establish a connection between the density of energy traps $\rho(E)$, and the observed behavior, showing that the phenomenon is truly universal, albeit with constants that depend on temperature and the level of disorder.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05585 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The log of the disorder-averaged probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The disorder-averaged probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The disorder-averaged probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chaudhuri, L

    P. Chaudhuri, L. Berthier, and W. Kob, Universal na- ture of particle displacements close to glass and jamming transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 060604 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    ˚Aberg and B

    C. ˚Aberg and B. Poolman, Glass-like characteristics of intracellular motion in human cells, Biophysical Journal 120, 2355 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    R. A. Denny, D. R. Reichman, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Trap models and slow dynamics in supercooled liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 025503 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Barkai, Y

    E. Barkai, Y. Garini, and R. Metzler, Strange kinetics of single molecules in living cells, Physics Today 65, 29 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    T. A. Waigh and N. Korabel, Heterogeneous anomalous transport in cellular and molecular biology, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 126601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Scher and E

    H. Scher and E. W. Montroll, Anomalous transit-time dispersion in amorphous solids, Phys. Rev. B 12, 2455 (1975)

    1975

  7. [7]

    Haus and K

    J. Haus and K. Kehr, Diffusion in regular and disordered lattices, Physics Reports 150, 263 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    Bouchaud and A

    J.-P. Bouchaud and A. Georges, Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications, Physics Reports 195, 127 (1990)

    work page 1990

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    G. H. Weiss, Random walks and random environments, volume 1: Random walks, Journal of Statistical Physics 82, 1675 (1996)

    1996

  2. [10]

    J. F. Douglas, Random walks and random environ- ments, vol. 2, random environments, Journal of Statis- tical Physics 87, 961 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    ben Avraham and S

    D. ben Avraham and S. Havlin, Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2000)

    2000

  4. [12]

    Metzler and J

    R. Metzler and J. Klafter, The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach, Physics Reports 339, 1 (2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    Metzler, J.-H

    R. Metzler, J.-H. Jeon, A. G. Cherstvy, and E. Barkai, Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: non- stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 24128 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    E. R. Weeks, J. C. Crocker, A. C. Levitt, A. Schofield, and D. A. Weitz, Three-dimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition, Science 287, 627 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    Hapca, J

    S. Hapca, J. W. Crawford, and I. M. Young, Anomalous diffusion of heterogeneous populations characterized by normal diffusion at the individual level, Journal of The Royal Society Interface 6, 111 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    B. Wang, S. M. Anthony, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, Anomalous yet brownian, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 15160 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Toyota, D

    T. Toyota, D. A. Head, C. F. Schmidt, and D. Mizuno, Non-gaussian athermal fluctuations in active gels, Soft Matter 7, 3234 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Stuhrmann, M

    B. Stuhrmann, M. S. e Silva, M. Depken, F. C. MacKin- tosh, and G. H. Koenderink, Nonequilibrium fluctuations of a remodeling in vitro cytoskeleton, Phys. Rev. E 86, 020901 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    B. Wang, J. Kuo, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, When brow- nian diffusion is not gaussian, Nature Materials 11, 481 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    J. Guan, B. Wang, and S. Granick, Even hard-sphere col- loidal suspensions display fickian yet non-gaussian diffu- sion, ACS Nano 8, 3331 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Stylianidou, N

    S. Stylianidou, N. Kuwada, and P. Wiggins, Cytoplas- mic dynamics reveals two modes of nucleoid-dependent mobility, Biophysical Journal 107, 2684 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    M. S. e Silva, B. Stuhrmann, T. Betz, and G. H. Koen- derink, Time-resolved microrheology of actively remod- eling actomyosin networks, New Journal of Physics 16, 075010 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    T. J. Lampo, S. Stylianidou, M. P. Backlund, P. A. Wig- gins, and A. J. Spakowitz, Cytoplasmic rna-protein parti- cles exhibit non-gaussian subdiffusive behavior, Biophys- ical Journal 112, 532 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Chakraborty and Y

    I. Chakraborty and Y. Roichman, Disorder-induced fick- ian, yet non-gaussian diffusion in heterogeneous media, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 022020 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    C. Xue, X. Shi, Y. Tian, X. Zheng, and G. Hu, Diffu- sion of nanoparticles with activated hopping in crowded polymer solutions, Nano Letters 20, 3895 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Length scales in brownian yet non-gaussian dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031002 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Pastore, A

    R. Pastore, A. Ciarlo, G. Pesce, F. Greco, and A. Sasso, Rapid fickian yet non-gaussian diffusion after subdiffu- sion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 158003 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Rusciano, R

    F. Rusciano, R. Pastore, and F. Greco, Fickian non- gaussian diffusion in glass-forming liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 168001 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Pastore, A

    R. Pastore, A. Ciarlo, G. Pesce, A. Sasso, and F. Greco, A model-system of fickian yet non-gaussian diffusion: light patterns in place of complex matter, Soft Matter 18, 351 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    M. Hu, H. Chen, H. Wang, S. Burov, E. Barkai, and D. Wang, Triggering gaussian-to-exponential transition of displacement distribution in polymer nanocomposites via adsorption-induced trapping, ACS Nano 17, 21708 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Schramma, C

    N. Schramma, C. P. Isra¨ els, and M. Jalaal, Chloro- plasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, 10.1073/pnas.2216497120 (2023). 6

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    J. Yang, L. Yang, and R. Y. Dong, Nanorod diffusion near the solid-liquid interface with varied wall nonuniformity, Langmuir 40, 14110 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Hidalgo-Soria, Y

    M. Hidalgo-Soria, Y. Haddad, E. Barkai, Y. Garini, and S. Burov, Directed motion and spatial coherence in the cell nucleus (2024), arXiv.2407.08899

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    M. V. Chubynsky and G. W. Slater, Diffusing diffusivity: A model for anomalous, yet brownian, diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 098302 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Jain and K

    R. Jain and K. L. Sebastian, Diffusing diffusivity: a new derivation and comparison with simulations, Journal of Chemical Sciences 129, 929 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov, Brownian yet non-gaussian diffusion: From superstatis- tics to subordination of diffusing diffusivities, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021002 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    E. B. Postnikov, A. Chechkin, and I. M. Sokolov, Brow- nian yet non-gaussian diffusion in heterogeneous media: from superstatistics to homogenization, New Journal of Physics 22, 063046 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Sposini, S

    V. Sposini, S. Nampoothiri, A. Chechkin, E. Orlandini, F. Seno, and F. Baldovin, Being heterogeneous is advan- tageous: Extreme brownian non-gaussian searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 117101 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    P. S. Laplace, M´ emoire de l’acad´ emie royale des sciences, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale des Sciences (1774)

  32. [40]

    P. S. Laplace, M´ emoires de l’acad´ emie royale des sciences de paris 1778, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale des Sci- ences de Paris (1781)

  33. [41]

    Hamdi, S

    O. Hamdi, S. Burov, and E. Barkai, Laplace’s first law of errors applied to diffusive motion, The European Physi- cal Journal B 97, 67 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Barkai and S

    E. Barkai and S. Burov, Packets of diffusing particles exhibit universal exponential tails, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 060603 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    W. Wang, E. Barkai, and S. Burov, Large deviations for continuous time random walks, Entropy 22, 697 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Pacheco-Pozo and I

    A. Pacheco-Pozo and I. M. Sokolov, Large deviations in continuous-time random walks, Phys. Rev. E103, 042116 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Luo and M

    L. Luo and M. Yi, Non-gaussian diffusion in static disor- dered media, Phys. Revi. E 97, 042122 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Pacheco-Pozo and I

    A. Pacheco-Pozo and I. M. Sokolov, Convergence to a gaussian by narrowing of central peak in brownian yet non-gaussian diffusion in disordered environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 120601 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Derrida, Velocity and diffusion constant of a periodic one-dimensional hopping model, Journal of Statistical Physics 31, 433 (1983)

    B. Derrida, Velocity and diffusion constant of a periodic one-dimensional hopping model, Journal of Statistical Physics 31, 433 (1983)

    1983

  40. [48]

    Bouchaud, A

    J. Bouchaud, A. Comtet, A. Georges, and P. L. Dous- sal, Classical diffusion of a particle in a one-dimensional random force field, Annals of Physics 201, 285 (1990)

    1990

  41. [49]

    Monthus and J.-P

    C. Monthus and J.-P. Bouchaud, Models of traps and glass phenomenology, Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and General 29, 3847 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    Monthus, Anomalous diffusion, localization, aging, and subaging effects in trap models at very low temper- ature, Phys

    C. Monthus, Anomalous diffusion, localization, aging, and subaging effects in trap models at very low temper- ature, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036114 (2003)

    2003

  43. [51]

    E. M. Bertin and J.-P. Bouchaud, Subdiffusion and lo- calization in the one-dimensional trap model, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026128 (2003)

    2003

  44. [52]

    Burov and E

    S. Burov and E. Barkai, Time transformation for random walks in the quenched trap model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 140602 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    H¨ ofling and T

    F. H¨ ofling and T. Franosch, Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells, Reports on Progress in Physics 76, 046602 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Akimoto, E

    T. Akimoto, E. Barkai, and K. Saito, Universal fluctua- tions of single-particle diffusivity in a quenched environ- ment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 180602 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Illien, O

    P. Illien, O. B´ enichou, G. Oshanin, A. Sarracino, and R. Voituriez, Nonequilibrium fluctuations and enhanced diffusion of a driven particle in a dense environment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200606 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Akimoto and K

    T. Akimoto and K. Saito, Exact results for first-passage- time statistics in biased quenched trap models, Phys. Rev. E 99, 052127 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Seki, Method of images for one-dimensional discrete symmetric random walk under a reflecting barrier (2024), arXiv.2408.00926

    K. Seki, Method of images for one-dimensional discrete symmetric random walk under a reflecting barrier (2024), arXiv.2408.00926

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    (4) for the ordered system, of Eq

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for technical details about the derivation of Eq. (4) for the ordered system, of Eq. (10) for the probability of the direct path for the quenched model and the lower bound Eq. (16), includ- ing the contributions of backward trajectories. Last...

  51. [59]

    Luo, J.-D

    X. Luo, J.-D. Bao, and W.-Y. Fan, Multiple diffusive be- haviors of the random walk in inhomogeneous environ- ments, Phys. Rev. E 109, 014130 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Woillez, Y

    E. Woillez, Y. Kafri, and N. S. Gov, Active trap model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 118002 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    H¨ anggi, P

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after kramers, Reviews of Modern Physics 62, 251 (1990)

    1990

  54. [62]

    Kumar, A

    V. Kumar, A. Pal, and O. Shpielberg, Arrhenius law for interacting diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. E 109, L032101 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Shafir and S

    D. Shafir and S. Burov, Disorder-induced anomalous mo- bility enhancement in confined geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 037101 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    J. C. Dyre, Master-equation appoach to the glass transi- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 792 (1987)

    1987

  57. [65]

    B¨ assler, Viscous flow in supercooled liquids analyzed in terms of transport theory for random media with en- ergetic disorder, Phys

    H. B¨ assler, Viscous flow in supercooled liquids analyzed in terms of transport theory for random media with en- ergetic disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 767 (1987)

    1987

  58. [66]

    Diezemann and A

    G. Diezemann and A. Heuer, Memory effects in the re- laxation of the gaussian trap model, Phys. Rev. E 83, 031505 (2011)

    2011

  59. [67]

    Scalliet, B

    C. Scalliet, B. Guiselin, and L. Berthier, Excess wings and asymmetric relaxation spectra in a facilitated trap model, The Journal of Chemical Physics 155, 10.1063/5.0060408 (2021)

    2021 doi

  60. [68]

    N. I. of Standards and Technology, Digital library of mathematical functions, equation 10.41.1

  61. [69]

    H. E. Daniels, Saddlepoint approximations in statistics, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25, 631 (1954). 7 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL I. Ordered system In this section, we derive Eqs. (2, 3), an explicit formula for Prob(→) and the asymptotic relationP (x, t) ∼ Prob(→) in...

    1954

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.