REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by
A modular quantum gas platform
T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a modular hardware architecture for quantum gas experiments in which exchangeable optical modules are passively aligned by mechanical pins to a common frame, with placement repeatability of a few tens of microns.
desk verdict A genuinely useful modular cold-atom hardware architecture with credible mechanical repeatability data, but the high-NA passive-alignment claim still rests on an unverified optical-axis alignment that the authors acknowledge. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The key mechanism is a global mechanical frame of reference: a monolithic aluminum board with precision-drilled holes, on which all modules are positioned by two stainless steel pins (the 'Pieces of Cake' mechanism). The pin-and-hole fit gives placement repeatability of order ±10 µm, and the frame defines a common origin (0,0,0) that overlaps the atom plane. For high-NA optics, the load-bearing element is a relay telescope that images the atom plane into an intermediate plane with a tunable magnification of 10-50x, converting small positioning requirements at the atoms into much larger ones at the modules, and the concept of an 'operative region' (OR) — the volume where a light field meets design specifications — which quantifies when different modules' ORs overlap sufficiently to be passively aligned.
What would settle it
Measure the trap frequencies of an optical tweezer at several positions inside the nominal ±100 µm field of view of the high-NA objective; a position-dependent shift of the trap center or distortion of the trap frequencies exceeding the tolerance implied by the 1 mrad window misalignment would show that passive alignment of the high-NA modules does not hold.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that quantum gas experiments can be modularized by moving the frame of reference from an optical definition to a mechanical one. Every optical module (a 'PoC' for horizontal low-NA optics, an 'mPoC' for high-NA optics) is referenced to a common machined board through two stainless steel pins fitting into precision holes, and the vacuum chamber is mounted on rails so it can be retracted and replaced by diagnostic tools. The authors show that placing PoCs this way yields centroid repeatability below ±10 µm horizontally and below ±5 µm vertically, and that transferring a PoC between the test bench and the experiment reproduces beam positions to better than ±30 µm horizontally and ±10 µm vertically. For the high-NA path, an intermediate relay telescope de-magnifies the beam by 3x and each module lens creates a magnified image of the atom plane (10-50x), so the placement tolerance at the module is tens of microns while the operative region at the atoms remains diffraction-limited. The paper presents this as a working configuration for a 6Li degenerate Fermi gas experiment, with a 2D-MOT source loading at 1.3e9 atoms/s and vacuum lifetimes above 1000 s, and argues the architecture generalizes to mixtures, Rydberg atoms, molecules, and ions.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the high-NA objective's optical axis is aligned with the vacuum window and the mechanical frame within about 1 mrad, an alignment the paper measures at (2.2 ± 1.6) mrad and defers final verification of to planned trap-frequency measurements.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- A new quantum gas machine can be assembled from pre-tested modules without realigning the whole apparatus; the paper reports that inserting a PoC and seeing the first atom signal takes about 15 minutes.
- The same module can be moved between ports or shipped to another group using the shared design repository, enabling hardware-level collaboration and duplication of experiments.
- Upgrading an experiment reduces to building and testing a new PoC or mPoC on a test bench, then swapping it in, rather than re-aligning the full optical setup.
- Multi-wavelength high-NA experiments (tweezers, box potentials, single-atom imaging) can share one objective through the relay-and-dichroic distribution board, with each wavelength's module carrying its own image plane and magnification.
- The mechanical frame concept is species-agnostic, so the platform can be extended from neutral atoms to mixtures, Rydberg atoms, molecules, and ions.
Reading between the lines
- Inference: if passive alignment holds as claimed, the practical bottleneck for reconfiguring quantum gas experiments shifts from optical alignment to machining precision, so precision CNC fabrication becomes the enabling infrastructure.
- Inference: the 'operative region' concept could be turned into a quantitative design catalog: measure each module's OR on the test bench and publish it, so any group can predict whether two modules will passively interface without ever mounting them together.
- Inference: a natural stress test the paper leaves implicit is cycling the vacuum system in and out of the rail system many times and tracking the atom-plane position drift, since the retraction feature is central to using diagnostic tools in place of the atoms.
- Inference: the single-laser frequency scheme with double-pass AOMs suggests two experiments could run from one oscillator; demonstrating simultaneous two-platform operation on one laser would be a direct test of the sharing argument.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports on the development of the "Heidelberg Quantum Architecture," a modular platform for ultracold quantum gas experiments. The architecture is built around a common mechanical frame of reference, to which exchangeable optical modules are attached: horizontal low-NA modules (PoCs) positioned by precision pins and high-NA modules (mPoCs) that interface through a shared microscope objective, a relay telescope, and a spectral distribution board with intermediate image planes. The vacuum system, including a 6Li 2D-MOT source, can be retracted to allow diagnostic tools to be placed at the atom position. Key quantitative claims include pin-based placement repeatability below ±10 µm, transferability between test bench and experiment below ±30 µm, a measured diffraction-limited FOV of ±104 µm for the high-NA objective, a 3D-MOT loading rate of 1.3 × 10^9 atoms/s, vacuum-limited lifetimes above 1000 s, RF Rabi frequencies around 20 kHz, and a workflow in which a newly inserted PoC produced a first atom signal within about 15 minutes. The central claim is that modules can be developed, tested, and calibrated independently on external test benches and then passively aligned to each other through the mechanical frame of reference.
Significance. If the passive-alignment claim is fully established, this is a significant engineering contribution to the cold-atom and quantum-simulation community. The modular approach could materially reduce the time and expertise needed to build, reconfigure, and share quantum gas experiments, and the standardized reference frame concept is a sensible step toward reproducibility and multi-group collaboration. The strengths of the paper include concrete, reproducible placement-repeatability measurements for PoCs, a clear and mostly parameter-free tolerance derivation in Appendix A 1, and a demonstrated end-to-end workflow that led to a first signal in 15 minutes. The high-flux 2D-MOT design and the relay-based mPoC architecture are also useful practical contributions. However, the paper's most distinctive claim—that mPoCs placed via the mechanical frame passively overlap at the atom plane—is not yet fully verified, because the residual angle between the objective's optical and mechanical axes exceeds the stated tolerance for the vacuum window.
major comments (2)
- [Appendix A 3 / Table II] The passive-alignment claim for the high-NA path is not yet supported by the presented data. The paper states that diffraction-limited performance requires the vacuum window to be perpendicular to the objective's optical axis to about 1 mrad, and that the window is aligned to the mechanical (housing) axis of the objective using a tilt sensor on the glass cell and frame. However, Table II reports the angle between the objective's optical and mechanical axes as (2.2 ± 1.6) mrad, with the measurement attributed to a Master's thesis [35] and no data shown. With the mean already exceeding 1 mrad and possible values up to about 3.8 mrad, the residual window-to-optical-axis tilt is plausibly above tolerance, which would shrink the usable diffraction-limited FOV below the ±100 µm operative region assumed for mPoCs. The paper explicitly defers final verification to planned trap-frequency measurements in an optical tweezer. Because this verification is central to the claim that mPoCs positioned via the frame passively overlap at the atom plane, the manuscript should either include the higher-precision measurement or present a quantitative argument that the current uncertainty does not compromise the OR overlap.
- [Section III B / Appendix B 3] The quantitative atom-source claims lack an uncertainty budget. The loading rate of 1.3 × 10^9 atoms/s is extracted from a linear fit in Figure 5b with no reported confidence interval, and the atom-number calibration is acknowledged to carry a systematic underestimate of approximately 30% for large samples (Appendix B 3). Similarly, the vacuum lifetimes reported in Appendix B 2 (500 s, 970 s, 1030 s) are given without error bars, despite being drawn from exponential fits. For a technical characterization paper, these values should be accompanied by at least a statement of statistical and systematic uncertainties, especially since the 30% calibration correction directly affects the headline loading rate.
minor comments (5)
- [Section III B] The text contains a typo: "ultrahigh vaccum" should be "ultrahigh vacuum."
- [Appendix B 2] The text near Figure 16 contains garbled strings beginning with "/uni00000013/..." that appear to be a rendering or conversion artifact; these should be removed so the paragraph reads cleanly.
- [Section III A 3] The abbreviation is written inconsistently as both "mPoCs" and "mPOCs"; please use one form throughout.
- [Reference [17]] Footnote 17 contains a typo: "The programmibilty is set to 1 µm" should read "programmability."
- [Figure 5b] The inset showing loading rate versus 2D-MOT power would benefit from error bars or at least a statement of the dominant uncertainty, since the main panel reports a single fitted value.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the tolerance derivation is a standard geometric-optics calculation with direct mechanical repeatability measurements, and the unresolved objective-axis measurement is an acknowledged limitation rather than a circular step.
full rationale
The central claims are self-contained. Appendix A1 derives the required tolerances from elementary geometrical optics: s_OR = s_PoC for translation, s_OR = tan(alpha)*d for angular offset, s_OR = tan(alpha)*f for the lens focusing case, and g' = M^2*g through a telescope. These are not fitted relations and do not presuppose the conclusion. The supporting experiments are direct measurements: pin-based PoC repeatability below +-10 um (Figure 4b and 10), transferability between test bench and experiment below +-30 um (Figure 4c), and in-situ camera placement below +-20 um (Figure 9). None of these is a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction. The mPoC claim does depend on the objective field of view and on the perpendicularity between the vacuum window and the optical axis, but the paper explicitly discloses the open item: Appendix A3 states that the measured angle between the optical and mechanical axis is (2.2 +- 1.6) mrad, that the simulated window-tilt tolerance is about 1 mrad, and that higher-precision confirmation is planned via trap-frequency measurements. This is an acknowledged missing measurement and a limitation, not a circular reduction. The only self-citations are minor and non-load-bearing: [39] (Hammel, 2021) supplies the oven design and the predicted ~1e16 s^-1 flux, and [35] (Bunjes thesis) supplies the objective FOV and axis-angle measurement. These are empirical or design inputs from prior group work, not definitions of the architecture's claims; the passive-alignment derivation does not reduce to them. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, no ansatz is smuggled in via citation, and no known result is merely renamed. The architecture claims stand on their own measurements and calculations.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption CNC machining and pin-hole clearance yield repeatable positioning on the order of plus or minus 10 micrometers, and this is sufficient for passive alignment given typical operative region sizes.
- domain assumption The high-NA objective's optical axis is aligned to the vacuum window and mechanical frame within about 1 mrad.
- domain assumption The vacuum lifetime extracted from a 3D-MOT decay is dominated by background-gas collisions.
- domain assumption Fluorescence-based atom-number calibration transfers to high-atom-number MOT parameters with a known 30 percent reduction factor.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of A modular quantum gas platform." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HAWEV4AP
@misc{pith2026250108211,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: A modular quantum gas platform},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HAWEV4AP}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08211}
}
read the original abstract
We report on the development of a modular platform for programmable quantum simulation with atomic quantum gases. The platform is centered around exchangeable optical modules with versatile functionalities. The performance of each module is disentangled from all others, enabling individual validation and maintenance of its outputs. The relative spatial positioning of the modules with respect to the position of the atomic sample is set by a global reference frame. In this way, the platform simplifies re-configuration and upgrading of existing setups and accelerates the design of new machines in a time- and cost-efficient manner. Furthermore, it facilitates collaboration among different experimental groups. This standardized hardware design framework, which we call Heidelberg Quantum Architecture, paves the way towards a new generation of on-demand and highly adaptable quantum simulation experiments.
Figures
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Parallel analog quantum simulation in homogeneous quantum gases
A single ultracold Fermi gas is partitioned into independently tunable quantum-simulation units, enabling parallel thermometry and Josephson-junction dynamics within one experimental cycle.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[35]
H. P. Wiendahl, D. Nofen, J. H. Klußmann, and F. Bre- itenbach, Planung modularer Fabriken: Vorgehen und Beispiele aus der Praxis (Hanser, M¨ unchen; Wien, 2005) p. 328
work page 2005
-
[1]
DC magnetic fields In Figure 6a a CAD drawing of the magnetic field coils as well as the glass cell and the high-NA objective is given. The coils are placed in close proximity to the main high-NA objective which is the most demanding and most sensitive piece of optics in the experiment. To ensure the long-term stability of the objective in terms of optica...
-
[2]
AC magnetic fields For the control of the internal spin states, we use single- loop RF coils. These are mounted on a small cage made from Ultem inside the Feshbach coils at a distance of 36 mm from the atoms. The impedance matching circuit of the antennas is placed above the coils and is connected via a short SMA cable to the antenna (see Figure 6a). In t...
work page 2020
-
[3]
P. U. of Toronto, Ultracold atom news, https:// ucan.physics.utoronto.ca/research-groups/ (2024), last checked on: 12. November 2024
work page 2024
-
[4]
Bloch, J
I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb` ene, Quantum sim- ulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012)
2012
-
[5]
C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aal3837
-
[6]
Navon, R
N. Navon, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantum gases in optical boxes, Nature Physics 17, 1334 (2021)
2021
-
[7]
Gross and W
C. Gross and W. S. Bakr, Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection, Nature Physics 17, 1316 (2021)
2021
Show all 53 references
-
[8]
A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nature Physics 17, 1324 (2021)
2021
-
[9]
C. J. Vale and M. Zwierlein, Spectroscopic probes of quantum gases, Nature Physics 17, 1305 (2021)
2021
-
[10]
M. A. Norcia and F. Ferlaino, Developments in atomic control using ultracold magnetic lanthanides, Nature Physics 17, 1349 (2021)
2021
-
[11]
Baroni, G
C. Baroni, G. Lamporesi, and M. Zaccanti, Quantum mixtures of ultracold gases of neutral atoms, Nature Re- views Physics 6, 736 (2024)
2024
-
[12]
S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ul- tracold molecules, Nature Physics 20, 730 (2024)
2024
-
[13]
Browaeys and T
A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with in- dividually controlled rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)
2020
-
[14]
M. P. A. Jones, L. G. Marcassa, and J. P. Shaffer, Spe- cial issue on rydberg atom physics, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 50, 060202 (2017)
2017
-
[15]
Blatt and C
R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Quantum simulations with trapped ions, Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012)
2012
-
[16]
Baccarini, The concept of project complexity—a re- view, International Journal of Project Management 14, 201 (1996)
D. Baccarini, The concept of project complexity—a re- view, International Journal of Project Management 14, 201 (1996)
1996
-
[17]
D. L. Parnas, On the criteria to be used in decompos- ing systems into modules, Commun. ACM 15, 1053–1058 (1972)
1972
-
[18]
Bergschneider, V
A. Bergschneider, V. M. Klinkhamer, J. H. Becher, R. Klemt, G. Z¨ urn, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Spin- resolved single-atom imaging of Li-6 in free space, Phys- ical Review A 97, 10.1103/physreva.97.063613 (2018)
2018 doi
-
[19]
The PoCs, mPoCs and the frame of reference breadboard have been machined by a CNC mill Deckel FP-50-CC. The programmibilty is set to 1 µm, however including wear of the drill as well as the positioning accuracy of the translation stages the actual measurable precision is in th...
-
[20]
D1 (Di03-R561-t3) is a longpass dichroic mirror to reflect 532 nm light out of the main beam path towards port P 1
The dichroics are standard products by Semrock. D1 (Di03-R561-t3) is a longpass dichroic mirror to reflect 532 nm light out of the main beam path towards port P 1. D2 (Di03-R685-t3) is a longpass dichroic mirror to split out light with wavelengths ≲ 698 nm. This light is subdi...
-
[21]
S. Jin, J. Gao, K. Chandrashekara, C. G¨ olzh¨ auser, J. Sch¨ oner, and L. Chomaz, Two-dimensional magneto- optical trap of dysprosium atoms as a compact source for efficient loading of a narrow-line three-dimensional magneto-optical trap, Phys. Rev. A 108, 023719 (2023)
2023
-
[22]
R. P. Bhatt, J. Kilinc, L. H¨ ocker, and F. Jendrzejewski, Stochastic dynamics of a few sodium atoms in presence of a cold potassium cloud, Scientific Reports 12, 2422 (2022)
2022
-
[23]
Nosske, L
I. Nosske, L. Couturier, F. Hu, C. Tan, C. Qiao, J. Blume, Y. H. Jiang, P. Chen, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source for cold strontium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053415 (2017)
2017
-
[24]
D¨ orscher, A
S. D¨ orscher, A. Thobe, B. Hundt, A. Kochanke, R. Le Targat, P. Windpassinger, C. Becker, and K. Sen- gstock, Creation of quantum-degenerate gases of ytter- bium in a compact 2d-/3d-magneto-optical trap setup, Review of Scientific Instruments 84, 10.1063/1.4802682 (2013)
2013 doi
-
[25]
Lamporesi, S
G. Lamporesi, S. Donadello, S. Serafini, and G. Ferrari, Compact high-flux source of cold sodium atoms, Review of Scientific Instruments 84, 10.1063/1.4808375 (2013)
2013 doi
-
[26]
T. G. Tiecke, S. D. Gensemer, A. Ludewig, and J. T. M. 12 Walraven, High-flux two-dimensional magneto-optical- trap source for cold lithium atoms, Physical Review A 80, 10.1103/physreva.80.013409 (2009)
2009 doi
-
[27]
Endres, H
M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom- by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aah3752
2016 doi
-
[28]
The RF cage has been developed in the UniRand group, led by Philipp Preiss, and can be seen as one example for sharable hardware between experiments set up within this platform
-
[29]
Lompe, Efimov Physics in a three-component Fermi gas, Ph.D
T. Lompe, Efimov Physics in a three-component Fermi gas, Ph.D. thesis, University of Heidelberg (2011)
2011
-
[30]
In the UniRand group the main contributors for the de- velopment of horizontal optical modules are Naman Jain and Jin Zhang
-
[31]
Mohamad, G
A. Mohamad, G. Hickethier, V. Hovestadt, and F. Gehbauer, Use of modularization in design as a strat- egy to reduce component variety in one-off projects, 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2013, IGLC 2013 , 285 (2013)
2013
-
[32]
Alexander, Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971) p
C. Alexander, Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971) p. 224
1971
-
[33]
Maynard, Modular Programming (Butterworths, Lon- don, 1972) p
J. Maynard, Modular Programming (Butterworths, Lon- don, 1972) p. 100
1972
-
[34]
Baldwin and K
C. Baldwin and K. Clark, Design Rules (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 461 pp., CII 2011) Chap. Transform- ing Modular Construction for the Competitive Advan- tage through the Adaptation of Shipbuilding Production Processes to Construction., research Summary, Construc- tion Indust...
2011
-
[36]
Javadi-Abhari, M
A. Javadi-Abhari, M. Treinish, K. Krsulich, C. J. Wood, J. Lishman, J. Gacon, S. Martiel, P. D. Na- tion, L. S. Bishop, A. W. Cross, B. R. Johnson, and J. M. Gambetta, Quantum computing with qiskit (2024), arXiv:2405.08810 [quant-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[37]
Bunjes, High-Resolution Optics for Modular Quantum Simulation, Master thesis, Heidelberg University (2022)
M. Bunjes, High-Resolution Optics for Modular Quantum Simulation, Master thesis, Heidelberg University (2022)
2022
-
[38]
The acceleration sensor used for alignment of the glass cell and the high-NA objective is the SCL3300-D01 by Murata
-
[39]
E. A. Norland, Techniques in using uv adhesives for op- tomechanical designs, in Proc. SPIE 2542, Optomechan- ical and Precision Instrument Design (1995)
1995
-
[40]
D. B. Hume, I. Stroescu, M. Joos, W. Muessel, H. Stro- bel, and M. K. Oberthaler, Accurate atom counting in mesoscopic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 253001 (2013)
2013
-
[41]
Hammel, Design and Construction of a New Exper- iment for Programmable Quantum Simulation using Ul- tracold 6Li Fermions, Master thesis, Heidelberg Univer- sity (2021)
T. Hammel, Design and Construction of a New Exper- iment for Programmable Quantum Simulation using Ul- tracold 6Li Fermions, Master thesis, Heidelberg Univer- sity (2021)
2021
-
[42]
V. P. I. C. B. Alcock and M. K. Horrigan, Vapour pres- sure equations for the metallic elements: 298–2500k, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 23, 309 (1984), https://doi.org/10.1179/cmq.1984.23.3.309. 13 Appendix A: Optical modules
1984 doi
-
[43]
Precise and repeatable positioning of a module with respect to the atoms is a requirement for modularization
Derivation of tolerances In Section III A the optical modules of this platform were presented. Precise and repeatable positioning of a module with respect to the atoms is a requirement for modularization. Here, we first derive the required tol- erances for the modularization o...
-
[44]
The test bench, shown in Figure 8, is an iden- tical copy of the interface for the PoCs on the frame of 14 FIG
Horizontal PoCs PoC test bench The PoCs can be set up and pre-aligned using a test bench. The test bench, shown in Figure 8, is an iden- tical copy of the interface for the PoCs on the frame of 14 FIG. 8. The PoC test bench here set up with two PoCs and the PEEK frame to mount...
-
[45]
Here, technical details are presented in the following order
V ertical mPoCs In Section III A 3, multiple technical challenges have been discussed, which need to be addressed to modular- ize high-NA optics. Here, technical details are presented in the following order. First, the high-NA objective, its special design features, as well as...
-
[46]
We will step by step set up the system summarized in Table I and III
A typical workflow To exemplify the advantages the modularization brings to working with this platform we describe a real life ex- ample of implementing new modules into our machine. We will step by step set up the system summarized in Table I and III. The first challenge is t...
-
[47]
Laser beams at 671nm For the platform described in Figure 2 a high flux atom source has been constructed. The favorable scaling of loading rates with optical power means that we need as much power as possible at the main cooling transition in 6Li, the |2S1/2⟩ → |2P3/2⟩ D2-line...
-
[48]
V acuum design SAES pumps push beam Glass cell Spacers permanent magnets FIG. 15. A CAD rendering of the vacuum assembly including a 2D-MOT, Ion-Getter pumps in HV and UHV region as well as the glass cell science chamber (top inset) and the push beam. The position of the horse...
2023
-
[49]
This is for example essential to quan- tify the loading rates of our 2D-MOT atom source
Atom number calibration A central tool for the quantitative characterization of the capabilities of this platform is the determination of atom numbers. This is for example essential to quan- tify the loading rates of our 2D-MOT atom source. For this atom counting we use a stan...
-
[50]
Oven and 2D-MOT chamber design Opening angle oven Edge of lithium coated area a) b) FIG. 18. a) The oven design [39] for this configuration of the platform. The dimensions of the reduced wall thickness segments are calculated assuming the 2D-MOT chamber as a heat bath at room ...
-
[51]
Here, we will give a brief character- ization of the most important tuning parameters of the 2D-MOT presented in Section III B
2D-MOT performance This modular platform is usable for a wide range of atomic species, for many of which a 2D-MOT as a cold atom source has already been shown to yield reasonable loading rates [19–24]. Here, we will give a brief character- ization of the most important tuning ...
-
[52]
DC Magnetic fields For the generation of DC offset fields as well as gradient fields in this experiment, we use four coils with 2 x 8 wind- ings each (see Figure 6a). The small number of windings is a compromise between using large cross-section wires (5 x 5 mm2 with a 3 mm di...
2000
-
[53]
The coil has dimensions of 30 mm × 22 mm and a distance of 36 mm to the atoms
RF coils and matching circuits The RF coils presented in Section III C 2 are single- loop coils wound around a holder to connect to the RF cage. The coil has dimensions of 30 mm × 22 mm and a distance of 36 mm to the atoms. Via a short SMA cable, the coils are connected to a m...
Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.