Accelerating charged and rotating black holes in scalar multipolar universes

Cristian Stelea; Marina-Aura Dariescu; Vitalie Lungu

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 31 references

Accelerating charged and rotating black holes in scalar multipolar universes

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs the general accelerating, charged, rotating black hole with NUT charge in a scalar multipolar universe by superposing a multipolar scalar field onto any stationary axisymmetric Einstein-Maxwell seed.

desk verdict The solution-generating step is sound; the real problem is the unproven coordinate transformation (37) that puts the accelerating seed in Weyl-Papapetrou form. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11807 v4 pith:6BHO5B5V submitted 2025-01-21 gr-qc hep-th

Cristian Stelea , Marina-Aura Dariescu , Vitalie Lungu This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-th

keywords scalarmultipolaruniversesWeyl-PapapetrouansatzsolutiongeneratingtechniqueacceleratingblackholesKerr-Newman-NUTspacetimeEinstein-Maxwell-scalartheorySchwarzschild-Melvindimensionalreduction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper gives a recipe for attaching a massless scalar field, with arbitrary multipole moments, to any stationary, axisymmetric solution of the Einstein-Maxwell equations. The recipe works by dimensionally reducing the spacetime along the time direction: in the reduced three-dimensional geometry the Ricci tensor is linear in the metric function $\gamma$, so the scalar field's contribution $\mu$ can simply be added to $\gamma$, turning $e^{2\gamma}$ into $e^{2\gamma+2\mu}$. Applying the recipe to the Type D accelerating Kerr-Newman-NUT metric (the charged, rotating, accelerating black hole with NUT charge) yields the claimed general accelerating charged rotating black hole with NUT charge in a scalar multipolar universe, and recovers the scalar Schwarzschild-Melvin solution and its rotating version as special cases. The construction yields a large exact family of black hole spacetimes in which the horizons are governed by the original seed while the scalar multipoles shape the surrounding and asymptotic geometry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Weyl-Papapetrou ansatz (the axisymmetric stationary metric form (19)) together with dimensional reduction along the timelike direction. In the reduced three-dimensional geometry the Ricci tensor is linear in the metric function $\gamma$, so two decoupled matter sources contribute additively: $R_{ij}[\lambda]=R_{ij}[\gamma]+R_{ij}[\mu]$, and one may take $\lambda=\gamma+\mu$. The scalar sector is a harmonic function $\varphi$ expanded in multipoles (12), with $\mu$ obtained by integrating (11), and the Maxwell sector is carried over from the seed unchanged. The coordinate transformations (31) and (37) bring the Kerr-Newman-NUT and accelerating Kerr-Newman-NUT metrics into Weyl-Papapetrou form, which is what allows the same superposition to dress both families.

What would settle it

Substitute the deformed metric (28) or (38), with the original Maxwell field carried over unchanged, directly into the reduced field equations (23). For a seed with magnetic charge $g\neq0$, the term $e^{4\psi}F^2$ in the $\psi$ equation acquires a factor $e^{-4\mu}$ under the deformation while the left-hand side of the equation scales like $e^{-2\mu}$, so satisfying the equation for arbitrary $\mu$ would require the magnetic part to vanish; evaluating this substitution for the metric (34) with $g\neq0$ would settle whether the claimed family is exact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a solution-generating theorem: from any stationary axisymmetric Einstein-Maxwell solution written in Weyl-Papapetrou form (19), one obtains a solution of the Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory (24) by keeping the fields $\psi$, $A$, and the Maxwell potential exactly as they are and replacing the spatial metric factor $e^{2\gamma}$ by $e^{2\gamma+2\mu}$. Here $\varphi$ is any harmonic function of the multipolar form (12) and $\mu$ is the back-reaction (13) determined by $\varphi$; this is what the authors call a scalar multipolar universe. Section 3 applies the recipe to the Type D accelerating Kerr-Newman-NUT solution and states that the metric (38) describes the general accelerating charged rotating black hole with NUT charge in scalar multipolar universes. The paper also isolates the profile $\varphi=kz$, giving the rotating and accelerating scalar Schwarzschild-Melvin solution, which reduces to the known static and rotating cases when the corresponding parameters vanish. It verifies that horizons are fixed by $\Delta_r=0$, that the ergosphere is unchanged, and that curvature singularities associated with growing multipoles sit in the asymptotic region.

Load-bearing premise

The construction rests on the assumption that the electromagnetic field of the seed solution still satisfies the dimensionally reduced field equations after the three-dimensional metric factor is changed from $e^{2\gamma}$ to $e^{2\gamma+2\mu}$; the paper relies on this invariance to carry the Maxwell field over unchanged, and it is the step that makes the charged rotating solutions (34) and (38) work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any stationary axisymmetric Einstein-Maxwell seed can be dressed by the same superposition, so the resulting family includes static, rotating, accelerating, charged, and NUT-charged black holes on multipolar scalar backgrounds, not just the one example treated in Section 3.
For the linear scalar profile $\varphi=kz$, the construction gives an explicit rotating and accelerating generalization of the scalar Schwarzschild-Melvin solution; setting rotation to zero returns the static scalar Schwarzschild-Melvin metric.
Black hole horizons remain located at the roots of $\Delta_r=0$ and the ergosphere properties are unchanged, so the rotating seed's causal structure survives the scalar dressing.
Growing scalar multipoles put naked singularities in the asymptotic region, while decaying multipoles give asymptotically flat geometries with singular horizons, matching the expected no-scalar-hair behaviour.
The method is intended by the authors to extend to five-dimensional black holes and to sigma-model reductions of compactified string theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper, the invariance of the seed's Maxwell sector under the metric deformation is the pivotal condition, and the cleanest test case is a magnetic charge: for $g\neq 0$ the $e^{4\psi}F^2$ term in the $\psi$ equation scales differently from the left-hand side under the deformation, so a direct substitution check would either confirm or break the claimed family.
Beyond the paper, the horizon-area formula (36) gives a concrete route to scalar-modified thermodynamics: for the $\varphi=kz$ profile $\mu_H=0$ and the horizon area is exactly the undressed seed's area, whereas other multipole profiles would modify the area by the factor $\int_0^\pi e^{\mu_H}\sin\theta\,d\theta$.
Beyond the paper, the scalar back-reaction distorts the horizon and the asymptotic metric, so the usual conical-defect balance conditions for accelerating black holes should be revisited in the dressed family; the equilibrium tuning may change even though the horizon radii do not.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the paper's central construction checks out, but the biggest claim rests on a step the authors simply assert.

What is actually new is a family of exact Einstein-Maxwell-scalar solutions, eqs. (34) and (38), adding a multipolar scalar field to known Type D accelerating Kerr-Newman-NUT seeds. This is a legitimate extension of Herdeiro and Cardoso-Natário, and the authors are upfront that the generating technique is a re-derivation of Eris-Gurses (1977) and that the seed comes from Astorino and Ovcharenko et al. No new physics is computed beyond horizon area; the paper is mostly "here is a family, here are some properties."

The method is sound. The key step is that starting from a stationary Weyl-Papapetrou Einstein-Maxwell seed, replacing γ by γ+μ with μ built from a harmonic scalar gives a new solution. The invariance of the matter equations under this rescaling is asserted, but you can check it: for a WP seed the 3-metric is e^{2λ}(dρ²+dz²)+ρ²dφ², the Maxwell field has only ρφ and zφ components, and every term in the reduced equations scales as e^{-2λ}. So the e^{-4μ} objection that gets circulated does not land. It would be good for the authors to show this in one line, but the step is real.

The soft spot that matters is the coordinate transformation (37). The paper says "it can be shown" that the Type D accelerating Kerr-Newman-NUT metric can be brought into WP form by (37), and gives no proof and no citation to the derivation. That transformation is load-bearing: if it is wrong, or if it leaves off-diagonal ρ,z terms, the theorem does not apply and (38) is not established. This is fixable—the transformation should be in the Astorino/Ovcharenko papers or derivable—but as submitted it is a genuine gap. There are also typos in (34) (unbalanced parentheses, and the Aφ term looks wrong) and no explicit field-equation check for the final metric. The physical part is thin: only horizon area, no discussion of conical defects or balance conditions for the accelerating case, which is where a scalar field might actually be interesting.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee. The method and the claimed family are plausible and likely correct; the paper needs a proof or citation for (37), a cleanup of typos, and ideally a brief verification that (38) solves the equations. I would send it to review with those conditions.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a solution-generating technique for four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell theory with a massless, minimally coupled scalar field. Starting from a stationary axisymmetric Einstein-Maxwell seed in Weyl-Papapetrou form (19), it claims that adding a multipolar scalar field (12) and changing the metric function γ to γ+μ, with μ determined by (13), yields a new solution (28). The technique is then applied to the type D accelerating Kerr-Newman-NUT solution (29). By a coordinate transformation (37), the authors assert the seed can be put in Weyl-Papapetrou form and thereby obtain the new family (38) representing accelerating charged rotating black holes with NUT charge in scalar multipolar universes. They also derive limits reproducing the Cardoso-Natário solution and its rotating version, and compute horizon areas and a Ricci scalar for special cases.

Significance. If the construction is valid, the paper provides a large and useful family of exact solutions. The technique itself is appealingly simple, relying on the linearity of the 3D Ricci tensor in the conformal factor, and it reduces the problem to solving a flat-space Laplace equation for the scalar field. The paper correctly stresses that the scalar multipole amplitudes are free parameters and that the construction is not circular. The main advertised result (38) extends the known scalar multipolar universe solutions to include acceleration, rotation, electric/magnetic charge, and NUT charge. However, two key steps—the invariance of the matter equations under the conformal deformation, and the existence of the Weyl-Papapetrou form for the accelerating seed—are not demonstrated in the manuscript, so the significance is conditional on filling these gaps.

major comments (2)

[Section 2 (after Eq. (27))] The paragraph after Eq. (27) asserts, without proof, that the matter field equations (23) remain satisfied after the metric function λ is changed from γ to γ+μ. This assertion is load-bearing for the theorem (28) and for all subsequent solutions. For seeds of the form (19) with A=χdt+Aφdφ and no dρ or dz components, the statement is actually correct: the terms e^{4ψ}F^2, e^{2ψ}F_(2)^2 and e^{-2ψ}(∂χ)^2 in Eq. (23) each acquire a factor e^{-2λ} under the rescaling of the 2D block, matching the left-hand side e^{-2λ}(ψ_{ρρ}+ψ_{zz}+ρ^{-1}ψ_ρ), and the Maxwell equations have the λ dependence cancel between √g3 and g^{ij}. The manuscript should present this scaling argument explicitly and state the restriction on the seed's vector-potential components.
[Section 3 (after Eq. (37))] The sentence 'in this case it can be shown' that the accelerating Type D solution (29) is brought into the Weyl-Papapetrou form (19) by the coordinate transformation (37) is a missing demonstration, not a proof. No explicit expressions for e^{2γ}, ψ, Aφ, or χ in the (ρ,z) coordinates are given, and no reference is cited for this transformation. Since the theorem (28) applies only to metrics already in the form (19), this step is indispensable for the central result (38). The authors should provide the explicit transformation result or a precise citation where the Weyl-Papapetrou form of the accelerating seed is derived.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (34)] Eq. (34) contains typographical errors: an extra closing parenthesis after 'a)' and 'dθ' should read 'dθ²'.
[Eqs. (21)-(23)] The definitions of F, F_(2), and the symbol A around Eq. (21) are ambiguous: A denotes both the 4D vector potential χdt+Aφdφ and the 3D one-form Aφdφ, and the statement 'F=dA' is unclear. Please clarify.
[Section 1] The claim in the Introduction that the method constructs 'the most general charged and rotating black holes with minimally coupled and massless scalar fields' is an overstatement; the construction is restricted to the Weyl-Papapetrou class and to a single minimally coupled scalar.
[Eq. (41)] Eq. (41) is stated without derivation; a short indication of how the Ricci scalar was computed (or a reference) would help the reader verify the scalar profile limit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the generating theorem combines an external seed solution with a freely chosen harmonic scalar; nothing is fitted or defined in terms of its own output.

full rationale

The construction in Section 2 starts from a known stationary Einstein-Maxwell solution in Weyl-Papapetrou form (19) and adjoins a harmonic scalar field phi of the general multipolar form (12), with the metric function lambda set to gamma+mu because the 3D Ricci tensor is linear in the conformal factor (17)-(18). The scalar multipole coefficients a_l, b_l are free parameters, not quantities fitted to any target output, and the resulting metric (28) is not used to define the seed or the scalar. Equation (34) then applies this theorem to the Kerr-Newman-NUT seed using the standard Weyl coordinates (31)-(33). The remaining step, the accelerating case, rests on the coordinate transformation (37), asserted with 'it can be shown' and without an explicit e^(2 gamma); that is an unproven correctness gap in the paper's derivation, not a circular reduction, because the transformation is external to the construction and is not defined in terms of the claimed output metric. Citations to prior work, including the authors' own [15] for the linearity of the Ricci tensor, are used for elementary statements also displayed in the text and are not load-bearing self-citations. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction introduces no new particles or forces. It relies on known solution-generating ideas and leaves the scalar multipole amplitudes and the example profile constant k as free parameters. The main burden is the unproven invariance of the Maxwell sector under the conformal deformation.

free parameters (2)

k = arbitrary
Amplitude of the example linear scalar profile phi = k z (Eq. 39). It is a free constant of the solution family, not fitted to data.
multipole coefficients a_l, b_l = arbitrary
Coefficients in the harmonic expansion (12); they parameterize the scalar multipolar universe and are not determined by the construction.

assumptions (3)

standard math The 3D Ricci tensor is linear in the conformal factor lambda (Eq. 3).
Used to justify setting lambda = gamma + mu to combine the seed and scalar sources in Eq. (27).
domain assumption The accelerating Kerr-Newman-NUT seed (29) can be recast in Weyl-Papapetrou form (19) via the coordinate transformation (37).
Asserted in Section 3 without proof; the explicit e^(2 gamma) is not provided.
domain assumption The electromagnetic field of the seed solves the reduced equations (23) also for the deformed 3D metric lambda = gamma + mu.
The key unproven step; the e^(4 psi) F squared term scales as e^(-4 mu) and breaks the psi equation unless the magnetic part vanishes.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Accelerating charged and rotating black holes in scalar multipolar universes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6BHO5B5V

@misc{pith2026250111807,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Accelerating charged and rotating black holes in scalar multipolar universes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6BHO5B5V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11807}
}

read the original abstract

Recently, Cardoso and Natario constructed an exact solution of Einstein-scalar field equations that describes a scalar counterpart of the Schwarzschild-Melvin Universe. In fact, this solution belongs to a more general class of solutions described by Herdeiro in [7]. In this work we show how to further generalize these solutions in presence of acceleration, rotation and various charges. More specifically, we describe general accelerating charged rotating black holes with NUT charge in scalar multipolar universes and present some of their properties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[1]

Quiros, Int

I. Quiros, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, no.07, 1930012 (2019) doi:10.1142/S021827181930012X [arXiv:1901.08690 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2019
[2]

Faraoni, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0

V. Faraoni, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0

doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0 1989
[3]

Aad et al

G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Phys. Lett. B 716, 1-29 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]]

arXiv 2012
[4]

Chatrchyan et al

S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS], Phys. Lett. B 716, 30-61 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]]

arXiv 2012
[5]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, no.09, 1542014 (2015) doi:10.1142/S0218271815420146 [arXiv:1504.08209 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2015
[6]

Cardoso and J

V. Cardoso and J. Nat´ ario, [arXiv:2410.02851 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[7]

C. A. R. Herdeiro, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139160 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139160 [arXiv:2410.12950 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2025
[8]

Astorino, Phys

M. Astorino, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064066 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.064066 [arXiv:1412.3539 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2015

Show all 31 references

[9]

Eris and M

A. Eris and M. Gurses, J. Math. Phys. 18, 1303 (1977) doi:10.1063/1.523419

1977 doi
[10]

Bogush and D

I. Bogush and D. Gal’tsov, Phys. Rev. D 102, no.12, 124006 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124006 [arXiv:2001.02936 [gr-qc]]

2020 arXiv
[11]

Barrientos, C

J. Barrientos, C. Charmousis, A. Cisterna and M. Hassaine, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, no.5, 537 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14282-y [arXiv:2501.10223 [gr-qc]]

2025 arXiv
[12]

Jafarzade, M

k. Jafarzade, M. Ghasemi-Nodehi, F. Sadeghi and B. Mirza, [arXiv:2501.11692 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[13]

M. T. Kachi, B. Mirza and F. Sadeghi, Annals Phys. 474, 169924 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.169924

2025
[14]

Maeda and C

H. Maeda and C. Martinez, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, no.18, 185017 (2019) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab293a [arXiv:1904.01658 [gr-qc]]

2019 arXiv
[15]

B. Chng, R. B. Mann and C. Stelea, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084031 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.084031 [arXiv:gr-qc/0608092 [gr-qc]]. 11

2006 arXiv
[16]

Astorino, Phys

M. Astorino, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.10, 104054 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.104054 [arXiv:2404.06551 [gr-qc]]

2024 arXiv
[17]

Ovcharenko, J

H. Ovcharenko, J. Podolsky and M. Astorino, Phys. Rev. D 111, no.2, 024038 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024038 [arXiv:2409.02308 [gr-qc]]

2025 arXiv
[18]

Ovcharenko, J

H. Ovcharenko, J. Podolsky and M. Astorino, Phys. Rev. D 111, no.8, 084016 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.084016 [arXiv:2501.07537 [gr-qc]]

2025 arXiv
[19]

Sen and N

S. Sen and N. Banerjee, Pramana 56, 487-501 (2001) doi:10.1007/s12043-001-0098-5 [arXiv:gr-qc/9809064 [gr-qc]]

2001 arXiv
[20]

B. Chng, R. B. Mann, E. Radu and C. Stelea, JHEP 12, 009 (2008) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2008/12/009 [arXiv:0809.0154 [hep-th]]

2008 arXiv
[21]

Stelea, K

C. Stelea, K. Schleich and D. Witt, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084037 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.084037 [arXiv:0909.3835 [hep-th]]

2011 arXiv
[22]

Stelea, C

C. Stelea, C. Dariescu and M. A. Dariescu, Phys. Rev. D 84, 044009 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.044009 [arXiv:1107.3484 [gr-qc]]

2011 arXiv
[23]

Stelea, K

C. Stelea, K. Schleich and D. Witt, Phys. Rev. D 91, 024040 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024040 [arXiv:1108.5145 [gr-qc]]

2015 arXiv
[24]

Stelea and M

C. Stelea and M. C. Ghilea, Phys. Lett. B 719, 191-195 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.009 [arXiv:1211.3725 [gr-qc]]

2013 arXiv
[25]

J. Kunz, P. G. Nedkova and C. Stelea, Nucl. Phys. B 874, 773-791 (2013) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.06.013 [arXiv:1304.7020 [gr-qc]]

2013 arXiv
[26]

Stelea, C

C. Stelea, C. Dariescu and M. A. Dariescu, Phys. Rev. D 87, no.2, 024039 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024039 [arXiv:1211.3154 [gr-qc]]

2013 arXiv
[27]

Stelea, Phys

C. Stelea, Phys. Rev. D 97, no.2, 024044 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.024044 [arXiv:1709.10309 [gr-qc]]

2018 arXiv
[28]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, no.12, 121401 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.121401 [arXiv:2305.15467 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[29]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. D 107, no.6, 064044 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064044 [arXiv:2302.00016 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[30]

Vigan` o, [arXiv:2211.00436 [gr-qc]]

A. Vigan` o, [arXiv:2211.00436 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[31]

Astorino and A

M. Astorino and A. Vigan` o, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.9, 829 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10787-y [arXiv:2105.02894 [gr-qc]]. 12

2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Quiros, Int

I. Quiros, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, no.07, 1930012 (2019) doi:10.1142/S021827181930012X [arXiv:1901.08690 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2019

[2] [2]

Faraoni, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0

V. Faraoni, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0

doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0 1989

[3] [3]

Aad et al

G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Phys. Lett. B 716, 1-29 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]]

arXiv 2012

[4] [4]

Chatrchyan et al

S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS], Phys. Lett. B 716, 30-61 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]]

arXiv 2012

[5] [5]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, no.09, 1542014 (2015) doi:10.1142/S0218271815420146 [arXiv:1504.08209 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2015

[6] [6]

Cardoso and J

V. Cardoso and J. Nat´ ario, [arXiv:2410.02851 [gr-qc]]

arXiv

[7] [7]

C. A. R. Herdeiro, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139160 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139160 [arXiv:2410.12950 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2025

[8] [8]

Astorino, Phys

M. Astorino, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064066 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.064066 [arXiv:1412.3539 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2015