Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Electric field reconstruction with three polarizations for the radio detection of ultra-high energy particles

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A frequency-domain chi-square fit reconstructs cosmic-ray air-shower electric fields to better than 4% peak-amplitude and 6% fluence scatter in simulations.

desk verdict A clean, useful methods paper whose headline precision numbers are only supported in a closed-loop simulation; the 3–5x gain from a vertical arm is the real result. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12614 v3 pith:MJ6KTSNX submitted 2025-01-22 astro-ph.IM hep-ex

Kewen Zhang , Tim Huege , Ramesh Koirala , Pengxiong Ma , Matías Tueros , Xin Xu , Chao Zhang , Pengfei Zhang
show 1 more author
Yi Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMhep-ex
keywords radiodetectionofairshowerselectricfieldreconstructionthree-polarizationantennasinclinedcosmicraysenergyfluenceGalacticbackgroundnoiseweightedleastsquares
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the electric field of a cosmic-ray air shower can be recovered from antenna voltages by a frequency-by-frequency weighted least-squares fit, using either two or three orthogonal polarizations. The fit weights each arm's voltage by the Galactic-noise power at that frequency, which suppresses the spurious spikes that direct matrix inversion produces where the antenna response is weak. Tested on simulated inclined showers with a simple dipole and the more complex HORIZON antenna, the method reaches a standard deviation better than 4% for the peak envelope amplitude and better than 6% for the energy fluence, with an antenna-dependent bias. Using the third, vertical polarization improves peak-amplitude precision by a factor of 3 to 5. If the result holds on real arrays, radio detectors can convert voltage traces into accurate electric fields without assumptions about the signal shape, which is the first step toward precise energy and composition measurements.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the closed-form weighted least-squares estimator \(E = (H^T \$sigma_V^{{-1}}$ H)^{-1} H^T \$sigma_V^{{-1}}$ V\), applied bin-by-bin in the frequency domain. Here \(H\) is the \(3 \times 2\) matrix of vector effective lengths mapping the two transverse field components \(E_\$\theta$, E_\phi\) to the three arm voltages, and \(\sigma_V = \operatorname{diag}(\sigma_{V1}^2, \sigma_{V2}^2, \sigma_{V3}^2)\) holds the noise power in each arm, taken from the Galactic background model. This machinery down-weights low-gain or noisy frequency bins instead of amplifying them, and it lets a weak vertical arm contribute information without destabilizing the estimate. Because the estimator is derived by setting the gradient of the \(\$chi^{2}$\) to zero, it is analytical and assumes no signal shape.

What would settle it

Re-run the same pipeline on signals with known electric fields but with noise drawn from a covariance that includes off-diagonal correlations between antenna arms, or inject a realistic electronic-noise contribution after the open-circuit voltage; if the relative-error scatter in peak envelope amplitude or energy fluence worsens noticeably beyond 4% or 6%, the diagonal-noise assumption behind the \(\$chi^{2}$\) weights is the failing piece.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that reconstructing the electric field as a weighted least-squares problem in the frequency domain solves the instability of the standard matrix-inversion approach, especially when a vertical polarization is added. At each frequency bin the estimator \[ E = (H^T \$sigma_V^{{-1}}$ H)^{-1} H^T \$sigma_V^{{-1}}$ V \] combines the three measured voltages \(V\) through the \(3 \times 2\) vector-effective-length matrix \(H\) and the diagonal noise covariance \(\sigma_V\), with the Galactic background spectrum setting the weights. This keeps the transverse-field estimate stable where one antenna arm has low gain or large noise, whereas direct inversion of the response matrix amplifies those bins into large artifacts. On Monte Carlo proton and iron showers from 63 to 87 degrees zenith, the method gives standard deviations near 3-4% for peak envelope amplitude and 4-6% for energy fluence, with a small systematic underestimation for the dipole and near-zero bias for the HORIZON antenna. The sharpest quantitative result is that the vertical arm improves peak-amplitude resolution by a factor of 3 to 5 across the SNR range.

Load-bearing premise

The quoted resolutions assume the noise in the three antenna arms is independent, dominated by the Galactic background, perfectly impedance-matched, and free of RF-chain electronic noise; if real noise is correlated or has extra components, the 4% and 6% figures do not automatically transfer to data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For inclined air showers, a three-polarization antenna plus this fit gives several times smaller peak-amplitude scatter than the same fit with two horizontal polarizations, across the whole SNR range.
  • The method applies to both a simple dipole and the broadband HORIZON antenna, so it can be adopted by current arrays using two polarizations and by three-polarization designs under development.
  • Because the estimator weights each frequency by the measured noise, it suppresses the spurious spectral spikes that matrix inversion generates near antenna resonances and low-gain directions.
  • Energy fluence, the integral of the squared field, can be estimated to better than 6% scatter, which transfers directly to the radiation-energy scale used for cosmic-ray energy reconstruction.
  • The reconstruction tolerates roughly one-degree errors in the assumed arrival direction for most directions, so it does not demand tighter direction reconstruction than already exists.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If real arrays supply an estimate of the full noise covariance instead of only the diagonal, the same closed-form estimator generalizes by replacing \(\sigma_V^{-1}\) with the inverse covariance; this is a natural upgrade for stations with correlated or non-Galactic noise.
  • The factor-3-to-5 gain from the vertical arm is largest at low SNR, which suggests that sparse three-polarization designs could recover otherwise lost events and expand the effective sky coverage of a fixed array.
  • The HORIZON antenna's 1-degree sensitivity in narrow zenith-angle ranges suggests an iterative workflow: fit the direction from the radio wavefront, reconstruct the field, then re-fit the direction on the clean field; this could shrink the high-zenith tail.
  • The same estimator, applied per frequency bin, can be reused as a building block for downstream Xmax and composition reconstruction, since it delivers a per-antenna field estimate without assuming a pulse shape.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an analytic chi-square minimization method for reconstructing the radio electric field from two or three orthogonally polarized antenna arms, with the estimator given in Eq. (3.7) as a frequency-domain weighted least-squares solution. The authors validate it with ZHAireS-simulated inclined air showers, HFSS antenna responses for a simple dipole and the HORIZON antenna, and LFmap Galactic noise, reporting standard deviations around 4% for the peak envelope amplitude and 4-6% for the energy fluence, along with an improvement by a factor of 3-5 when the vertical polarization is included. The paper also studies arrival-direction dependence and the effect of 1-degree direction perturbations on the reconstruction.

Significance. The mathematical derivation is clean and the simulation pipeline is well documented. If the stated performance holds in more realistic conditions, the method would be a useful, computationally simple alternative to iterative forward-folding for three-polarization arrays such as GRAND and LOPES-3D, and the demonstration that a vertical arm improves low-SNR reconstruction is a valuable quantitative result. However, the headline numbers are obtained in a self-consistency simulation and are not yet supported as detector-level resolutions; the paper's own figures contain inconsistencies with the abstract and conclusion. The central method itself is sound, but the performance claims need to be scoped and corrected.

major comments (4)
  1. [2.4 and 3.2] Eq. (3.5) uses the same LFmap noise spectra as the diagonal covariance that were used to generate the noise in Sec. 2.4, and Eq. (3.7) uses the same HFSS equivalent lengths that produced the voltages in Eq. (2.2). Under this exact generative model the generalized least-squares estimator is near-optimal, so the quoted 4% and 6% values are lower bounds for an idealized detector, not validated resolutions. The abstract should be qualified accordingly, and the authors should add a robustness test with mismatched noise spectra, non-diagonal covariance, or a perturbed antenna response.
  2. [Abstract, Sec. 4.2, Sec. 5] The abstract's 'better than 4%' and Sec. 5's 'about 3%' for the PEA are not both consistent with Fig. 10, where the total standard deviations are 0.04 (HORIZON) and 0.03 (dipole), and where the dipole total also shows a mean and median bias of 0.05. The latter bias implies a total RMS relative error of about 6% for the dipole even before considering the HORIZON theta-component, which has std = 0.12. The headline should state explicitly which component the 4% refers to, and the text-figure discrepancy for the dipole std should be corrected.
  3. [4.2.3 and Fig. 13] A 1-degree Gaussian perturbation of the arrival direction changes the HORIZON PEA relative-error std from 0.04 in Fig. 10 to 0.12 in Fig. 13. The statement in Sec. 5 that this perturbation 'has no significant impact on the overall resolution' is therefore not supported by the paper's own figures, even if the effect is concentrated at zenith angles above 85 degrees. Please quantify the impact conditional on the relevant subpopulation and revise the conclusion accordingly.
  4. [4.3 and Fig. 15] For the energy fluence, the text states a 4% standard deviation for both antennas, but Fig. 15 shows std = 0.06 for one antenna in the total panel and std = 0.19 for the HORIZON theta-component. The abstract's 'better than 6%' is only defensible for the total or phi-dominated component, not for the theta component. Please reconcile the text and figure and state the conditional nature of the 6% claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [3.2] Eq. (3.5): the notation sigma_V = diag(sigma_V1, sigma_V2, sigma_V3) is ambiguous; the diagonal elements are variances, so please denote them as sigma_i^2 and reserve sigma_V for the covariance matrix.
  2. [Figs. 10 and 15] Please include a legend or explicitly state in the captions which histogram and color correspond to each antenna, since the current text relies on color, which is not accessible in grayscale.
  3. [2.1] Please define the exact list of zenith angles used, since the grid in log10(1/cos theta) maps to specific theta values; this would make Figs. 12-14 easier to interpret.
  4. [4.2.1] The definition of W_psi68 as the '34th percentile above and below the median' should be clarified as the half-width of the central 68% interval, i.e., half the distance between the 16th and 84th percentiles.
  5. [4.3] The choice of 100 ns signal and noise windows should be justified or tested for sensitivity, since the fluence estimates depend on the window boundaries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the weighted least-squares estimator uses external antenna-response and noise inputs, and the reported resolutions are simulation outputs, not refitted inputs.

full rationale

The reconstruction chain is not circular. The forward model V = H E + N (Eqs. 2.2 and 3.1) uses ZHAireS electric fields, HFSS equivalent lengths, and LFmap noise as external inputs; the estimator E_hat = (H^T sigma_V^-1 H)^-1 H^T sigma_V^-1 V (Eq. 3.7) is the standard weighted least-squares solution derived by minimizing Eq. 3.5, with sigma_V taken from the LFmap spectra and H from HFSS. No parameter is fitted to the PEA or fluence values that are later reported; the 4%-6% resolutions are measured from the distribution of differences between reconstructed and simulated traces (Figs. 10 and 15), and the method is benchmarked against independent ZHAireS shower simulations. The fact that the simulation injects the same antenna response and noise model that the estimator assumes makes the test idealized, and the authors explicitly defer RF-chain electronic noise and calibration uncertainties to future work (Sec. 2.4). That is a limitation of extrapolation to real data, not a logical reduction of the claimed result to its inputs. Self-citations to GRAND, Huege, and LOPES-3D work appear in introductory or contextual statements and do not carry the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method itself has no fitted coefficients, but the reported resolution numbers are conditional on several hand-chosen analysis settings and simulation assumptions listed above. The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities; its only new object is the estimator, which is a standard weighted least-squares solution built from existing quantities.

free parameters (7)
  • SNR trigger threshold = 5
    Events must have SNR > 5 in at least one arm; the reported resolutions are calculated only for events passing this cut.
  • Minimum triggered antennas = 5
    At least 5 antennas must pass selection; excluding events with fewer triggered antennas changes the resolution sample.
  • Inner antenna ring limit = 16 of 20 per arm
    Only the innermost 16 antennas are used because outer antennas have negligible signal; this truncation affects the fluence footprint.
  • Fluence signal window = 100 ns around peak
    Chosen to capture the main pulse, but inclined showers have long tails; window adequacy is not tested.
  • Noise fluence window = 100 ns at trace terminus
    Used to subtract noise fluence; assumes stationary noise across the trace.
  • Noise reference LST = 18 h
    Galactic noise is evaluated at a fixed local sidereal time with elevated noise; results depend on this choice.
  • Direction perturbation sigma = 1 degree
    The robustness test uses 1-degree Gaussian errors, claimed larger than typical direction resolution but not tied to a measured reconstruction pipeline.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Electromagnetic wave is transverse in air; the radial (r) field component is negligible, reducing the 3x3 response matrix to 3x2 (Eq 3.2).
    Invoked in Sec 3 before Eq 3.2; standard far-field approximation, but near-field or non-transverse components would be dropped.
  • domain assumption Noise in the three polarizations is independent and follows LFmap galactic background with ideal impedance matching; no RF-chain electronic noise is included.
    Sec 2.4 and Eq 3.5 build the chi-square weights from this diagonal covariance; correlated or electronic noise would break optimality.
  • domain assumption ZHAireS electric fields are the true ground truth and HFSS antenna responses including ground effects are accurate.
    Secs 2.1 and 2.2; the validation is only as faithful as these simulations.
  • domain assumption The arrival direction is known well enough to select the antenna response; 1-degree perturbations are used as a proxy for reconstructed direction errors.
    Sec 4.2.3; the reconstruction uses the response matrix at the assumed direction, so direction errors propagate into E-field errors.
  • ad hoc to paper Signal energy fluence is captured by a 100 ns window around the peak, and noise fluence in a terminal 100 ns window is representative.
    Sec 4.3; this window choice is not derived from the simulated signal durations and could bias fluence low for long tails.
  • ad hoc to paper Event selection criteria define the population for which resolutions are reported.
    Sec 4.1; resolutions are conditional on SNR > 5, inner 16 rings, and N_antenna >= 5, so they do not describe all triggered events.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electric field reconstruction with three polarizations for the radio detection of ultra-high energy particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MJ6KTSNX

@misc{pith2026250112614,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electric field reconstruction with three polarizations for the radio detection of ultra-high energy particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MJ6KTSNX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12614}
}
abstract

Accurate reconstruction of the electric field produced by Extensive Air Showers from the signals recorded by the antennas is essential for the radio detection technique, as the key parameters needed to retrieve information about the primary particle that generated the shower are the amplitude, polarization, frequency spectrum and energy fluence carried by the electric field at each measurement position. Conventional electric field reconstruction methods primarily focus on antennas with two horizontal polarizations. In this paper, we introduce an analytical $\chi^2$ minimization method that operates with both two and three polarizations, providing the reconstructed electric field at each antenna. This solution has been verified for simple and realistic antenna responses, with a particular focus on inclined air showers. Our method achieves a standard deviation better than 4\% in determining the peak envelope amplitude of the electric field and better than 6\% in the estimation of the energy fluence, with an antenna response dependent bias. Additionally, we have studied the dependence of the method with arrival direction showing that it has a good performance in almost all of them. This work also demonstrates that incorporating vertically polarized antennas enhances the precision of reconstruction, leading to a more accurate and reliable electric field estimation for inclined air showers. Consequently, the method improves our ability to extract information about cosmic rays from the detected signals in current and future experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconstruction of inclined cosmic-ray properties with GRAND data

    astro-ph.IM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying the ADF radio-amplitude model directly to voltage traces reconstructs inclined cosmic-ray directions to about 0.09 degrees and gives first-order energies, validated with simulations and GRANDProto300 candidates.

  2. End-to-end reconstruction of ultra-high energy particle observables from radio detection of extensive air showers

    astro-ph.IM 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A simulation study demonstrates a radio-only reconstruction chain for inclined air showers, reporting 0.04 degree angular and about 10 percent energy resolution.

  3. Progress of the GRANDProto300 Project

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    GRANDProto300 reports deployment progress, radio calibration, detection of solar and galactic radio emission, and one candidate cosmic-ray event with 65 antennas operational.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Bl¨ umer, R

    J. Bl¨ umer, R. Engel and J.R. H¨ orandel,Cosmic rays from the knee to the highest energies , Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 63 (2009) 293–338

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Pierre Augercollaboration, Measurement of the Energy Spectrum of Cosmic Rays above 1018 eV Using the Pierre Auger Observatory , Phys. Lett. B 685 (2010) 239 [ 1002.1975]

    arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Ackermann et al., High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos: A Snowmass white paper , JHEAp 36 (2022) 55 [ 2203.08096]

    M. Ackermann et al., High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos: A Snowmass white paper , JHEAp 36 (2022) 55 [ 2203.08096]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Coleman, J

    A. Coleman, J. Eser, E. Mayotte, F. Sarazin, F. Schr¨ oder, D. Soldin et al., Ultra high energy cosmic rays the intersection of the cosmic and energy frontiers , Astroparticle Physics 149 (2023) 102819

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Zhang, K

    B.T. Zhang, K. Murase, N. Ekanger, M. Bhattacharya and S. Horiuchi, Ultraheavy ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Abreu, M

    P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, J.M. Albury, I. Allekotte, A. Almela, J. Alvarez-Mu˜ niz et al., The energy spectrum of cosmic rays beyond the turn-down around 1017ev as measured with the surface detector of the pierre auger observatory , The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Pierre Augercollaboration, The Pierre Auger Cosmic Ray Observatory , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 798 (2015) 172 [ 1502.01323]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Abu-Zayyad, R

    T. Abu-Zayyad, R. Aida, M. Allen, R. Anderson, R. Azuma, E. Barcikowski et al., The surface detector array of the telescope array experiment , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 689 (2012) 87–97

    work page 2012

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Aartsen, M

    M. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens et al., The icecube neutrino observatory: instrumentation and online systems , Journal of Instrumentation 12 (2017) P03012–P03012

    2017

  2. [10]

    Huege, Radio detection of cosmic ray air showers in the digital era , Physics Reports 620 (2016) 1–52

    T. Huege, Radio detection of cosmic ray air showers in the digital era , Physics Reports 620 (2016) 1–52

    2016

  3. [11]

    Schr¨ oder,Radio detection of cosmic-ray air showers and high-energy neutrinos , Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 93 (2017) 1–68

    F.G. Schr¨ oder,Radio detection of cosmic-ray air showers and high-energy neutrinos , Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 93 (2017) 1–68

    2017

  4. [12]

    W. Apel, J. Arteaga-Vel´ azquez, L. B¨ ahren, K. Bekk, M. Bertaina, P. Biermann et al.,The wavefront of the radio signal emitted by cosmic ray air showers , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (2014) 025–025

    2014

  5. [13]

    Bezyazeekov, N

    P. Bezyazeekov, N. Budnev, D. Chernykh, O. Fedorov, O. Gress, A. Haungs et al., Reconstruction of cosmic ray air showers with tunka-rex data using template fitting of radio pulses, Physical Review D 97 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Huege, The radio detector of the pierre auger observatory – status and expected performance, EPJ Web of Conferences 283 (2023) 06002

    T. Huege, The radio detector of the pierre auger observatory – status and expected performance, EPJ Web of Conferences 283 (2023) 06002

    2023

  7. [15]

    F. Schr¨ oder,Design and expected performance of the icecube-gen2 surface array and its radio component, in Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Acoustic and Radio EeV Neutrino Detection Activities — PoS(ARENA2022) , ARENA2022, p. 058, Sissa Medialab, May, 2023, DOI

    2023

  8. [16]

    Kahn and I

    F.D. Kahn and I. Lerche, Radiation from cosmic ray air showers , Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 289 (1966) 206

    1966

  9. [17]

    Askaryan, Excess Negative Charge of the Electron-Photon Shower and Coherent Radiation Originating from It

    G.A. Askaryan, Excess Negative Charge of the Electron-Photon Shower and Coherent Radiation Originating from It. Radio Recording of Showers under the Ground and on the Moon , Journal of the Physical Society of Japan Supplement 17 (1962) 257. – 27 –

    1962

  10. [18]

    James, Nature of radio-wave radiation from particle cascades , Phys

    C.W. James, Nature of radio-wave radiation from particle cascades , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 023014 [2201.01298]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Chiche, C

    S. Chiche, C. Zhang, F. Schl¨ uter, K. Kotera, T. Huege, K.D. de Vries et al., Loss of coherence and change in emission physics for radio emission from very inclined cosmic-ray air showers , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 231001

    2024

  12. [20]

    de Vries, A.M

    K.D. de Vries, A.M. van den Berg, O. Scholten and K. Werner, Coherent cherenkov radiation from cosmic-ray-induced air showers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 061101

    2011

  13. [21]

    Huege, L

    T. Huege, L. Brenk and F. Schl¨ uter, A rotationally symmetric lateral distribution function for radio emission from inclined air showers , EPJ Web of Conferences 216 (2019) 03009

    2019

  14. [22]

    Schl¨ uter, M

    F. Schl¨ uter, M. Gottowik, T. Huege and J. Rautenberg, Refractive displacement of the radio-emission footprint of inclined air showers simulated with CoREAS , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 643 [ 2005.06775]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Huege, M

    T. Huege, M. Ludwig and C.W. James, Simulating radio emission from air showers with coreas, in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP, 2013, DOI

    2013

  16. [24]

    Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, W.R

    J. Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, W.R. Carvalho and E. Zas,Monte carlo simulations of radio pulses in atmospheric showers using zhaires , Astroparticle Physics 35 (2012) 325–341

    2012

  17. [25]

    Falcke, W.D

    H. Falcke, W.D. Apel, A.F. Badea, L. B¨ ahren, K. Bekk, A. Bercuci et al., Detection and imaging of atmospheric radio flashes from cosmic ray air showers , Nature 435 (2005) 313–316

    2005

  18. [26]

    Ardouin, A

    D. Ardouin, A. Bell´ etoile, D. Charrier, R. Dallier, L. Denis, P. Eschstruth et al., Radio-detection signature of high-energy cosmic rays by the codalema experiment , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Ass...

    2005

  19. [27]

    China Phys

    GRAND collaboration, The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND): Science and Design , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63 (2020) 219501 [ 1810.09994]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Abbasi, M

    R.U. Abbasi, M. Abe, T. Abu-Zayyad, M. Allen, R. Azuma, E. Barcikowski et al., Depth of ultra high energy cosmic ray induced air shower maxima measured by the telescope array black rock and long ridge fadc fluorescence detectors and surface array in hybrid mode , The Astrophys...

    2018

  21. [29]

    RNO-G collaboration, Design and Sensitivity of the Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland (RNO-G), JINST 16 (2021) P03025 [ 2010.12279]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Corstanje, P

    A. Corstanje, P. Schellart, A. Nelles, S. Buitink, J. Enriquez, H. Falcke et al., The shape of the radio wavefront of extensive air showers as measured with lofar , Astroparticle Physics 61 (2015) 22–31

    2015

  23. [31]

    Decoene, Sources and detection of high-energy cosmic events , Ph.D

    V. Decoene, Sources and detection of high-energy cosmic events , Ph.D. thesis, Sorbonne universit´ e, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Buitink et al., High-resolution air shower observations with the Square Kilometer Array , PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 503

    S. Buitink et al., High-resolution air shower observations with the Square Kilometer Array , PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 503

    2023

  25. [33]

    Corstanje et al., Prospects for measuring the longitudinal particle distribution of cosmic-ray air showers with SKA , PoS ARENA2022 (2023) 024 [ 2303.09249]

    A. Corstanje et al., Prospects for measuring the longitudinal particle distribution of cosmic-ray air showers with SKA , PoS ARENA2022 (2023) 024 [ 2303.09249]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Schl¨ uter and T

    F. Schl¨ uter and T. Huege,Signal model and event reconstruction for the radio detection of inclined air showers , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (2023) 008

    2023

  27. [35]

    Pierre Auger Collaborationcollaboration, Radio measurements of the depth of air-shower maximum at the pierre auger observatory , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 022002

    2024

  28. [36]

    Buitink, A

    S. Buitink, A. Corstanje, J. Enriquez, H. Falcke, J.R. H¨ orandel, T. Huege et al., Method for high precision reconstruction of air shower using two-dimensional radio intensity profiles , Physical Review D 90 (2014) . – 28 –

    2014

  29. [37]

    Buitink, A

    S. Buitink, A. Corstanje, H. Falcke, J.R. H¨ orandel, T. Huege, A. Nelles et al., A large light-mass component of cosmic rays at 1017-1017.5 electronvolts from radio observations , Nature 531 (2016) 70–73

    2016

  30. [38]

    Huege, J.D

    T. Huege, J.D. Bray, S. Buitink, D. Butler, R. Dallier, R.D. Ekers et al., Ultimate precision in cosmic-ray radio detection — the ska , EPJ Web of Conferences 135 (2017) 02003

    2017

  31. [39]

    Buitink, J.D

    S. Buitink, J.D. Bray, A. Corstanje, M. Desmet, H. Falcke, K. Gayley et al., High-resolution air shower observations with the Square Kilometer Array , in 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference, p. 503, Sept., 2024, DOI

    2024

  32. [40]

    Corstanje et al., A LOF AR-style reconstruction of cosmic-ray air showers with SKA-Low , 2504.16873

    A. Corstanje et al., A LOF AR-style reconstruction of cosmic-ray air showers with SKA-Low , 2504.16873

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Abreu, M

    P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, E. Ahn, I. Albuquerque, D. Allard, I. Allekotte et al., Advanced functionality for radio analysis in the offline software framework of the pierre auger observatory, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometer...

    2011

  34. [42]

    Glaser, A

    C. Glaser, A. Nelles, I. Plaisier, C. Welling, S.W. Barwick, D. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez et al., NuRadioReco: A reconstruction framework for radio neutrino detectors , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 464 [ 1903.07023]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Welling, C

    C. Welling, C. Glaser and A. Nelles, Reconstructing the cosmic-ray energy from the radio signal measured in one single station , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (2019) 075–075

    2019

  36. [44]

    Welling, P

    C. Welling, P. Frank, T. Enßlin and A. Nelles, Reconstructing non-repeating radio pulses with information field theory , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (2021) 071

    2021

  37. [45]

    Str¨ ahnz, T

    S. Str¨ ahnz, T. Huege, P. Frank and T. Enßlin, Electric field reconstruction with information field theory, p. 056, ARENA, 11, 2024, DOI

    2024

  38. [46]

    Huber, Analysing the electric field vector of air shower radio emission , Ph.D

    D. Huber, Analysing the electric field vector of air shower radio emission , Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruher Institut f¨ ur Technologie (KIT), 2014. 10.5445/IR/1000043289

    2014

  39. [47]

    D. Huber et al., LOPES 3D – studies on the benefits of EAS-radio measurements with vertically aligned antennas , in 6th International Workshop on Acoustic and Radio EeV Neutrino Detection Activities , 8, 2022 [ 2208.14664]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    D. Heck, J. Knapp, J.N. Capdevielle, G. Schatz and T. Thouw, CORSIKA: a Monte Carlo code to simulate extensive air showers. (1998)

    1998

  41. [49]

    Huege and O

    T. Huege and O. Kr¨ omer,Broad-band, high-gain, low-frequency antennas for radio detection of earth-skimming tau neutrinos , JINST 19 (2024) P11022 [ 2410.22945]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    GRAND collaboration, The Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND) Collaboration – Contributions to the 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2023) , in 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference , 7, 2023 [ 2308.00120]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Ansys HFSS, High Frequency Structure Simulator

    Ansys Inc., “Ansys HFSS, High Frequency Structure Simulator.” Version 2021 R1, https://www.ansys.com/products/electronics/ansys-hfss, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Abreu, M

    P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, M. Ahlers, E.J. Ahn, I.F.M. Albuquerque, D. Allard et al., Antennas for the detection of radio emission pulses from cosmic-ray induced air showers at the pierre auger observatory, Journal of Instrumentation 7 (2012) P10011–P10011

    2012

  45. [53]

    D. Charrier, Antenna development for astroparticle and radioastronomy experiments , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 662 (2012) S142

    2012

  46. [54]

    GRAND collaboration, GRANDlib: A simulation pipeline for the Giant Radio Array for Neutrino Detection (GRAND) , Comput. Phys. Commun. 308 (2025) 109461 [ 2408.10926]. – 29 –

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    ´Alvarez Mu˜ niz, R

    J. ´Alvarez Mu˜ niz, R. Alves Batista, A. Balagopal V., J. Bolmont, M. Bustamante, W. Carvalho et al., The giant radio array for neutrino detection (grand): Science and design , Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy 63 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    B¨ usken, T

    M. B¨ usken, T. Fodran and T. Huege,Uncertainties of the 30–408 mhz galactic emission as a calibration source for radio detectors in astroparticle physics , Astronomy and Astrophysics 679 (2023) A50

    2023

  49. [57]

    Polisensky, Lfmap: A low frequency sky map generating program , Long Wavelength Array Memo Series 111 (2007) 515

    E. Polisensky, Lfmap: A low frequency sky map generating program , Long Wavelength Array Memo Series 111 (2007) 515

    2007

  50. [58]

    Guzm´ an, J

    A.E. Guzm´ an, J. May, H. Alvarez and K. Maeda, All-sky galactic radiation at 45 mhz and spectral index between 45 and 408 mhz , Astronomy and Astrophysics 525 (2010) A138

    2010

  51. [59]

    E., Falcke, H

    Schellart, P., Nelles, A., Buitink, S., Corstanje, A., Enriquez, J. E., Falcke, H. et al., Detecting cosmic rays with the lofar radio telescope , Astronomy and Astrophysics 560 (2013) A98

    2013

  52. [60]

    Corstanje, S

    A. Corstanje, S. Buitink, M. Desmet, H. Falcke, B. Hare, J. H¨ orandel et al., A high-precision interpolation method for pulsed radio signals from cosmic-ray air showers , Journal of Instrumentation 18 (2023) P09005

    2023

  53. [61]

    Behnke, K

    O. Behnke, K. Kroninger, G. Schott and T. Sch¨ orner-Sadenius, Data analysis in high energy physics: A practical guide to statistical methods , in Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods , 2013, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:60282717

    2013

  54. [62]

    Glaser, M

    C. Glaser, M. Erdmann, J.R. H¨ orandel, T. Huege and J. Schulz, Simulation of Radiation Energy Release in Air Showers , JCAP 09 (2016) 024 [ 1606.01641]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    A. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, E. Ahn, I. Al Samarai, I. Albuquerque et al., Energy estimation of cosmic rays with the engineering radio array of the pierre auger observatory , Physical Review D 93 (2016) . – 30 –

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.