Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Entanglement dynamics in collision models and entanglement quilts

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pairwise entanglement in excitation-exchange collision models is exactly solvable, and the resulting all-to-all entangled 'quilt' is destroyed by a single excited qubit.

desk verdict Exact tangle recurrences for Hee collision models are a solid, citable contribution, but the 'single excited qubit destroys the quilt' claim is overstated and needs a finite-size/collision-angle qualification before the paper is ready. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12629 v1 pith:MCUGOXUI submitted 2025-01-22 quant-ph

Le Hu , Andrew N. Jordan This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81P4081P68
keywords collisionmodelsentanglementdynamicsconcurrencetangleconservationquiltmultipartiteW-likestatesexcitation-exchangeHamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops an exact, collision-by-collision account of pairwise entanglement in a family of quantum collision models, using the square of concurrence (tangle) as the conserved quantity. It identifies a class of genuinely multipartite entangled states, called entanglement quilts, in which every qubit pair is entangled with every other pair, and shows that such quilts can be generated by simple repeated collisions under the excitation-exchange Hamiltonian. The central counterintuitive result is fragility: in the same models, a single initially excited bath qubit changes the two-qubit reduced state from a Q-state to a φ-state, adding a negative term to every pairwise concurrence, and asymptotically kills all nonlocal entanglement. The authors connect this hypersensitivity to the disappearance of long-range entanglement in condensed-matter systems at nonzero temperature, and give temperature estimates for experimental preparation.

What carries the argument

The central technical objects are the four density-matrix structures—X-state, □-state, φ-state, and Q-state—for which Wootters concurrence has the closed formulas in Eq. (3). Under Hee with a fresh ground-state qubit, the Q-structure is invariant, which lets the authors write exact recurrence relations for the tangle; the diagrammatic method tracks each collision as the old qubit's entanglement is redistributed between the old partner and the new qubit, with tangle conserved nonlocally. The transition from Q- to φ-states under collision with an excited qubit is the mechanism that injects the negative √(ρ11ρ44) term and kills long-range pairwise entanglement.

What would settle it

Numerically simulate the exact unitary dynamics for 30 qubits in the Hee model with the 10th qubit initially excited, and compute the exact pairwise concurrences without the large-m approximation; if any nonlocal pair with indices far from the excited qubit (e.g., qubits 2 and 29) retains positive concurrence after many collisions, the paper's asymptotic claim of vanishing nonlocal entanglement is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the excitation-exchange collision model (Hee = Ω(σ+⊗σ− + σ−⊗σ+)), starting from one excited qubit and all others in the ground state, the global state is always a W-like state, and pairwise tangle obeys the recurrences τ′_BC = 4ρ33² sin²(Ωt)cos²(Ωt), τ′_AiC = τ_AiB sin²(Ωt), and τ′_AiB = τ_AiB cos²(Ωt). As a result, after enough collisions any schedule produces an entanglement quilt: every qubit is entangled with every other qubit, and the full state is genuinely multipartite entangled. If instead even one bath qubit is initially excited, the reduced states of pairs shift from Q-structure to φ-structure, so their concurrence acquires a negative −√(ρ11ρ44) term; in the long-chain limit the nonlocal pairwise concurrences vanish, replacing the quilt by localized blocks of entanglement. The paper also solves the many-to-one collision case analytically, shows that σx⊗σx interactions localize entanglement, and provides temperature estimates for preparing quilts.

Load-bearing premise

The fragility conclusion rests on a large-chain approximation that simplifies the concurrence formulas and sets two nonlocal concurrences to zero; if that approximation fails for a particular finite chain or collision schedule, the quilt could be more robust than the paper's general statement claims.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under Hee with a single excitation, any collision schedule yields a W-like state, so an entanglement quilt can be prepared with a number of √iSWAP-like gates that scales linearly with the number of qubits.
  • The same recurrences show that a uniform entanglement quilt—where every pair is equally entangled—equals a W state up to local phases.
  • A single excited bath qubit fragments the quilt into localized blocks, and more scattered excitations fragment it further; in the alternating Néel state almost all nonlocal entanglement is destroyed.
  • Since the whole-system state is always W-like when only one excitation is present, the model offers a linear-cost preparation of W states on a quantum computer.
  • The paper's temperature estimate implies that for 5 GHz qubits, an entanglement quilt of about 10^5 qubits requires cooling to about 20 mK, and 10^10 qubits requires about 10 mK.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Q-to-φ transition is the generic mechanism for fragility, analogous hypersensitivity should appear in other collision models or short-range interacting systems whenever local excitations change the invariant structure of two-qubit reduced states; probing that with the recurrence relations would generalize the paper's result beyond Hee.
  • The speculative subsystem-entanglement property of quilts could be tested numerically for small subsystem sizes before a generalized monogamy inequality is proved, since the CKW inequality currently supports only the qubit-versus-subsystem statement.
  • The diagrammatic recurrence suggests a design principle: choose collision times adaptively (as in the uniform-quilt construction) to counteract the fragmentation induced by excited qubits, potentially protecting long-range entanglement against thermal noise.
  • Because the whole state remains W-like with one excitation, measuring the tangle of a single pair determines the full pairwise entanglement structure; this could make the quilt a convenient testbed for experimentally verifying genuine multipartite entanglement via pairwise concurrences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytical framework for pairwise concurrence dynamics in quantum collision models, based on recurrence relations for reduced density matrices with special structures (X, square, phi, Q). The authors introduce a diagrammatic method to track entanglement flow collision by collision, and apply it to several models. The central constructive result is that in the excitation-exchange (Hee) model with one initial excitation and all other qubits initially in |0>, the global state remains W-like, and pairwise tangle obeys simple recurrence relations such as tau'_AiC = tau_AiB sin^2(Omega t) and tau'_AiB = tau_AiB cos^2(Omega t). After sufficiently many collisions this produces an 'entanglement quilt' in which every qubit pair has positive concurrence, including a uniform quilt protocol with linear gate count. The paper further claims that the quilt is hypersensitive to local excitation fluctuations: even a single excited bath qubit destroys the quilt, because reduced density matrices change from Q-type to phi-type and the concurrence acquires a negative sqrt(rho11 rho44) contribution. This fragility is then used to discuss the absence of long-range entanglement in condensed-matter systems at finite temperature, with an estimate of the number of qubits that can be entangled at dilution-refrigerator temperatures.

Significance. If the central constructive claim holds, the paper provides a rare case where pairwise concurrence can be tracked analytically for all qubit pairs in a many-body collision model, and the diagrammatic method offers an intuitive and potentially generalizable tool. The explicit W-state preparation protocols with linear resource scaling are concrete and likely useful. The paper is also honest in labeling the subsystem-entanglement property as speculation. However, the most striking claim—the fragility of entanglement quilts under a single excited qubit—is only an asymptotic statement in the current manuscript, and the numerical evidence is confined to a regime where the approximation is expected to hold. Qualifying this claim would preserve the constructive contributions while making the paper more accurate.

major comments (3)
  1. The unqualified claim that 'even a single excited qubit can destroy the entanglement quilt' is not established for finite chains and general collision angles. The derivation of C'_jm = C'_j,m+1 = 0 relies on the large-m approximation, where rho33 is assumed small and sqrt(rho22 rho44) is approximated by sqrt(rho22). Using the exact entries of Eq. (12) in Eq. (12) for finite m, the negative term -sqrt(rho11 rho44) does not always dominate: for example, for m=4, j=3 and Omega t = pi/3 one obtains C'_34 > 0, so nonlocal entanglement can survive the collision with an excited qubit in short chains. The 30-qubit heat maps in Fig. 4 use Omega t = pi/4, which lies in the asymptotic regime and therefore do not display this behavior. The abstract's sweeping statement and the condensed-matter extrapolation in Section IV.C require a finite-size and collision-angle qualification, or an explicit proof that the asymptotic regime is reached under the stated conditions.
  2. The claim that 'regardless of the collision rules and the number of collisions' the global state remains W-like is too broad as stated. The derivation explicitly assumes the interaction Hamiltonian is Hee, all qubits have the same frequency, the initial state has exactly one excitation (qubit A in |1>, all others in |0>), and each collision involves a new qubit that is initially disentangled and in |0>. Without these conditions, the W-like structure can fail; indeed, Section III.B shows that changing the initial state of just one new qubit to |1> changes the reduced density matrices from Q-type to phi-type. The statement should be formulated as a theorem with the precise hypotheses, rather than a blanket 'regardless of collision rules' claim.
  3. The analysis of fragility stops at the first collision with the excited qubit and does not prove that later collisions cannot revive nonlocal concurrence. Equations (12)-(15) give the post-collision density matrices after the (m+1)-th qubit collides with the m-th qubit, but subsequent collisions involving other qubits could in principle redistribute entanglement and restore some nonlocal pairwise concurrence. The paper's conclusion that the quilt is destroyed and long-range entanglement disappears therefore rests on an implicit assumption that no later collision can repair the phi-state structure. This needs either a proof, a monotonicity argument, or a clear statement that the claim is only about the immediate post-collision state.
minor comments (6)
  1. There are several typographical errors: 'Wootter's' should be 'Wootters' in Section II, and the title contains a spurious space in 'entanglemen t quilts'.
  2. Panel (d) uses the symbol alpha for tangle in some labels (e.g., alpha_AB, alpha_AC) while the text and other panels use tau; please unify the notation.
  3. The inline annotation '=0 if phi=0' inside the equation is confusing because phi is defined only after the equation; consider stating this case separately after defining phi1 and phi2.
  4. Reference [51] appears with placeholder author names 'and and and'; the full citation should be completed.
  5. The approximation sign is used without an error estimate; adding a leading-order error term or a short bound would make the asymptotic argument more transparent and easier to verify.
  6. The speculation about subsystem entanglement is clearly labeled, which is good; however, it would be helpful to state explicitly that the generalized CKW inequality for qudits is an open question, rather than implying it is merely a matter of proof.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's entanglement predictions follow from explicit Hamiltonian-driven recurrence relations and independent numerical evaluation, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is transparent and self-contained: the authors specify the collision Hamiltonian Hee (Eq. 4), assume product initial states with known excitation content, and then derive recurrence relations for density-matrix entries and concurrences (Eqs. 5-6, Table B1). The entanglement-quilt statements are obtained by evaluating those recurrences, not by assuming the desired conclusion. The uniform quilt protocol is obtained by choosing collision times to equalize mean excitations, and the resulting uniform pairwise tangle then follows from the formula tau_ij = 4|a_i|^2 |a_j|^2; no quantity is fit to the tangle it is said to predict. The temperature estimates use the Boltzmann distribution directly, without fitting the target temperature or quilt size. The fragility claim rests on the large-m approximation in Eqs. (14)-(15); this is an approximation whose finite-size validity may be questioned, but an approximation is not circularity. The paper contains self-citations (Refs. [16], [45] with author Jordan), but these are background references and do not carry the load-bearing argument. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. Overall, the central results are independent derivations from stated assumptions, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; Omega, omega, and t are model parameters chosen for examples, and the only hand-chosen schedule is the collision time sequence for the uniform quilt. The new named concept, "entanglement quilt", is a property of states, not a new physical entity. The main axioms are the standard concurrence framework plus the restricted initial-state and interaction class that makes the reduced density matrices tractable.

free parameters (1)
  • collision time schedule t_i = t_i = (1/Omega) arcsin sqrt((n-i+1)/(n-i+2))
    Chosen by hand to equalize excitation probabilities and produce a uniform quilt; it is a control parameter, not a fit to an external dataset.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Wootters concurrence is a faithful two-qubit entanglement measure for the reduced states studied.
    Used throughout; the paper's claim that all two-qubit measures are equivalent is only strictly true for pure states, while reduced pairs are generally mixed.
  • domain assumption Each fresh qubit is initialized in |0> or |1> and is disentangled before its first collision.
    Section II and Table I; required for the X, square, phi, and Q structures to be preserved under Hee and Hxy.
  • domain assumption Interactions are restricted to Hee or Hxy type with at most one collision at a time, apart from the many-to-one extension.
    Section II; this keeps the total excitation conserved for Hee and yields simple recurrences.
  • domain assumption Trotterized two-qubit collisions faithfully model the entanglement dynamics of continuous many-body systems.
    Section IV.C; used to motivate condensed matter implications, explicitly heuristic.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entanglement dynamics in collision models and entanglement quilts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MCUGOXUI

@misc{pith2026250112629,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entanglement dynamics in collision models and entanglement quilts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MCUGOXUI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12629}
}
read the original abstract

We study the entanglement dynamics of a family of quantum collision models by analytically solving the pairwise concurrence for all qubit pairs. We introduce a diagrammatic method that offers an intuitive, frame-by-frame understanding of these dynamics. This allows us to monitor how a single collision affects the entanglement of the whole many-body system in some special cases. We focus on a class of models where the square of concurrence is a conserved quantity in the qubit collisions, aiding us to formulate general rules of entanglement propagation. In particular, among the multiple examples we will be showing, we identify a type of genuine multipartite entanglement, which we refer to as \textit{entanglement quilt}, where every qubit is entangled with every other qubit. We find that in some models, an entanglement quilt is hypersensitive to local excitation fluctuations: The presence of even a single excited qubit can destroy the entanglement quilts. We offer a detailed mathematical treatment on the phenomena, which can help us understand the disappearance of long-range entanglement in condensed matter systems above zero temperature. We also speculate about a possible property of the entanglement quilt: Every subsystem of it is entangled with every other subsystem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12629 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Diagrammatic description of entanglement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The entanglement dynamics of the 4th collision [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Visualization of pairwise entanglement of the 4th model in Tab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Visualization of pairwise entanglement of the 3rd model in Tab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Visualization of pairwise entanglement of the 3rd model in Tab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Visualization of pairwise entanglement of the 1st model in Tab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: General entanglement dynamics of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Two groups of disentangled and non-interacting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Two old qubits B and C, which are previously [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The pairwise entanglement of 30 qubits after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    τ ′ AiC +τ ′ AiB = τAiB [see Eq

    Here, we use tangle (the square of concurrence) τ = C2 to measure the entanglement, because in this special example, τ is a conserved quantity among non- local change of entanglement, i.e. τ ′ AiC +τ ′ AiB = τAiB [see Eq. ( 5) and ( 6)], where τ and τ ′ denote pre- and post-collision tangle, respectively. In general, the entan- glement dynamics in this mo...

    work page

  2. [2]

    J. T. Barreiro, T.-C. Wei, and P. G. Kwiat, Beating the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense cod- ing, Nature physics 4, 282 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    0⟩ +a2 |010

    First, it can be shown that regardless of the colliding rules and the number of collisions, in this partic- ular model, the state |ψ⟩ for the whole system is always a W-like state, |ψ⟩ =a1 |100... 0⟩ +a2 |010... 0⟩ + · · · +an |000... 1⟩, (8) 6 where∑ n i=1 |ai|2 = 1. This suggests that the effective di- mension of the Hilbert space is just n, where n is t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Bouwmeester, J.-W

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. We- infurter, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental quantum tele- portation, Nature 390, 575 (1997)

    1997

  5. [5]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    Jozsa and N

    R. Jozsa and N. Linden, On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences 459, 2011 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    Hamiltonian

    Note that even though the group of qubits are not interacting with each other, they may nevertheless become entangled post-collision because of their simultaneous interaction with the same qubit. As one may expect, the dynamics of many-to-one collision will be more complicated than that of one-to- one collision, and analytical results will be more limited...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Scarani, H

    V. Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. J. Cerf, M. Duˇ sek, N. L¨ utkenhaus, and M. Peev, The security of practical quantum key distribution, Reviews of modern physics 81, 1301 (2009)

    2009

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    ˙Zyczkowski, P

    K. ˙Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Dynamics of quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012101 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140404 (2004)

    2004

  3. [11]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Evolution from entanglement to decoherence of bipartite mixed “x” states, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0503089 (2005)

    2005 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Yonac, T

    M. Yonac, T. Yu, and J. H. Eberly, Pairwise concurrence dynamics: a four-qubit model, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 40, S45 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    Li and G

    J. Li and G. S. Paraoanu, Generation and propagation 20 of entanglement in driven coupled-qubit systems, New Journal of Physics 11, 113020 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    Li, Y.-X

    X.-M. Li, Y.-X. Chen, Y.-J. Xia, Q. Zhang, and Z.-X. Man, Quantum entanglement dynamics based on com- posite quantum collision model, Chinese Physics B 29, 060302 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Bellomo, R

    B. Bellomo, R. Lo Franco, and G. Compagno, Entan- glement dynamics of two independent qubits in envi- ronments with and without memory, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032342 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    S. I. Doronin, Multiple quantum spin dynamics of entan- glement, Phys. Rev. A 68, 052306 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    Gennaro, G

    G. Gennaro, G. Benenti, and G. M. Palma, Entangle- ment dynamics and relaxation in a few-qubit system in- teracting with random collisions, Europhysics Letters 82, 20006 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    Tiersch, F

    M. Tiersch, F. de Melo, and A. Buchleitner, Entangle- ment evolution in finite dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 170502 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    Chantasri, M

    A. Chantasri, M. E. Kimchi-Schwartz, N. Roch, I. Sid- diqi, and A. N. Jordan, Quantum trajectories and their statistics for remotely entangled quantum bits, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041052 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Mortezapour, G

    A. Mortezapour, G. Naeimi, and R. Lo Franco, Coher- ence and entanglement dynamics of vibrating qubits, Op- tics Communications 424, 26 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Fang, J.-L

    Y.-L. Fang, J.-L. Zhao, D.-X. Chen, Y.-H. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Q.-C. Wu, C.-P. Yang, and F. Nori, Entan- glement dynamics in anti- PT -symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033022 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Tong, J.-H

    Q.-J. Tong, J.-H. An, H.-G. Luo, and C. H. Oh, Mech- anism of entanglement preservation, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052330 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Y. S. Weinstein, Entanglement dynamics in three-qubit x states, Phys. Rev. A 82, 032326 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    Czerwinski, Entanglement dynamics governed by time-dependent quantum generators, Axioms 11, 10.3390/axioms11110589 (2022)

    A. Czerwinski, Entanglement dynamics governed by time-dependent quantum generators, Axioms 11, 10.3390/axioms11110589 (2022)

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    J. Ma, Z. Sun, X. Wang, and F. Nori, Entanglement dy- namics of two qubits in a common bath, Phys. Rev. A 85, 062323 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Bellomo, R

    B. Bellomo, R. Lo Franco, and G. Compagno, Non- markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 160502 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    Hu and H

    J. Hu and H. Yu, Entanglement dynamics for uniformly accelerated two-level atoms, Phys. Rev. A 91, 012327 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    C. E. L´ opez, G. Romero, F. Lastra, E. Solano, and J. C. Retamal, Sudden birth versus sudden death of entan- glement in multipartite systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080503 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Mazzola, S

    L. Mazzola, S. Maniscalco, J. Piilo, K.-A. Suominen, and B. M. Garraway, Sudden death and sudden birth of en- tanglement in common structured reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042302 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    T. J. Osborne and M. A. Nielsen, Entanglement in a sim- ple quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032110 (2002)

    2002

  23. [31]

    Vidal, G

    J. Vidal, G. Palacios, and C. Aslangul, Entanglement dynamics in the lipkin-meshkov-glick model, Phys. Rev. A 70, 062304 (2004)

    2004

  24. [32]

    Subrahmanyam, Entanglement dynamics and quantum-state transport in spin chains, Phys

    V. Subrahmanyam, Entanglement dynamics and quantum-state transport in spin chains, Phys. Rev. A 69, 034304 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Amico, A

    L. Amico, A. Osterloh, F. Plastina, R. Fazio, and G. Massimo Palma, Dynamics of entanglement in one- dimensional spin systems, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022304 (2004)

    2004

  26. [34]

    Y. Li, X. Li, and J. Jin, Information scrambling in a collision model, Phys. Rev. A 101, 042324 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Wang, B.-S

    Z.-H. Wang, B.-S. Wang, and Z.-B. Su, Entanglement evolution of a spin-chain bath coupled to a quantum spin, Phys. Rev. B 79, 104428 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    Y. Li, X. Li, and J. Jin, Dissipation-induced infor- mation scrambling in a collision model, Entropy 24, 10.3390/e24030345 (2022)

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    Wang, Entanglement in the quantum heisenberg XY model, Phys

    X. Wang, Entanglement in the quantum heisenberg XY model, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012313 (2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    Alkurtass, G

    B. Alkurtass, G. Sadiek, and S. Kais, Entanglement dy- namics of one-dimensional driven spin systems in time- varying magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022314 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    A. L. de Paula, J. G. G. de Oliveira, J. G. P. de Faria, D. S. Freitas, and M. C. Nemes, Entanglement dynamics of many-body systems: Analytical results, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022303 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Iyoda and T

    E. Iyoda and T. Sagawa, Scrambling of quantum infor- mation in quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. A 97, 042330 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Z. Qi, T. Scaffidi, and X. Cao, Surprises in the deep hilbert space of all-to-all systems: From superexponen- tial scrambling to slow entanglement growth, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054301 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    W. W. Ho and D. A. Abanin, Entanglement dynamics in quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094302 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Zhang, Information scrambling and entanglement dy- namics of complex brownian sachdev-ye-kitaev models, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 1 (2023)

    P. Zhang, Information scrambling and entanglement dy- namics of complex brownian sachdev-ye-kitaev models, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 1 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224307 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    M. Yu, O. G¨ uhne, and S. Nimmrichter, Exact entangle- ment dynamics of two spins in finite baths, Phys. Rev. A 108, 022415 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    N. S. Williams and A. N. Jordan, Entanglement genesis under continuous parity measurement, Phys. Rev. A 78, 062322 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an ar- bitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)

    1998

  42. [50]

    Ciccarello, S

    F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti, and G. M. Palma, Quantum collision models: Open system dynam- ics from repeated interactions, Physics Reports 954, 1 (2022), quantum collision models: Open system dynam- ics from repeated interactions

    2022

  43. [51]

    Cattaneo, G

    M. Cattaneo, G. De Chiara, S. Maniscalco, R. Zambrini, and G. L. Giorgi, Collision models can efficiently simulate any multipartite markovian quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 130403 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Kuwahara and K

    T. Kuwahara and K. Saito, Exponential clustering of bipartite quantum entanglement at arbitrary tempera- tures, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021022 (2022) . 21

    2022

  45. [53]

    Smith, M

    A. Smith, M. Kim, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Simu- lating quantum many-body dynamics on a current digi- tal quantum computer, npj Quantum Information 5, 106 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    and and and, Pairwise quantum correlations for super- positions of dicke states, Communications in Theoretical Physics 57, 771 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Coffman, J

    V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000)

    2000

  48. [56]

    T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete, General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220503 (2006) . (a) A B sin2(2t0) (b) A B C α AB sin2 t1 sin2(2t1) sin4 t0α AB cos2 t1 (c) A B C D α AC cos2 t2 α BC sin2 t2 α AC sin2 t2 α BC cos2 t2 sin4(t0) s...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.