Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new effective-one-body model claims that the evolving angular momentum of a neutron star's lagging tidal bulge — the tidal spin — must be included in gravitational-wave templates, because ignoring it produces phase errors of 0.3 to 4…

desk verdict A careful derivation of a missing tidal-spin back-reaction and a public EOB model, but the headline claim that it resolves the NR-analytical mismatch rests on a qualitative visual analogy, not a quantitative comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13064 v2 pith:JTUHSRYN submitted 2025-01-22 gr-qc

Hang Yu , Shu Yan Lau This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords tidalspindynamicaltideseffective-one-bodyneutronstargravitationalwavesf-moderesonanceeffectiveLovenumberwaveformmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that when a neutron star's tidal bulge lags behind its companion because the orbit is continuously shrinking, the bulge carries angular momentum the authors call the tidal spin. This tidal spin back-reacts on the orbit through a Newtonian tidal torque and a post-Newtonian orbital hang-up, and the paper constructs an effective-one-body (EOB) waveform model for binary neutron star and neutron star–black hole systems that includes this back-reaction, along with finite-frequency corrections to gravitational-wave emission at first post-Newtonian order. Ignoring tidal spin, the paper claims, causes phase errors of 0.3 to 4 radians at the waveform's peak amplitude, depending on the star's background spin. The difference between waveforms with and without tidal spin resembles the difference between numerical relativity and previous effective-Love-number models, which the paper takes as evidence that tidal spin is a necessary ingredient for faithful templates in the late inspiral.

What carries the argument

The central object is the tidal spin S1z,mode = sum_a m_a eps_a |b_a|^2, the canonical angular momentum carried by the tidally excited f-modes, which represents the evolving part of the neutron star's spin. Its equations of motion come from a phase-space modal decomposition, and its back-reaction enters the EOB dynamics through the exact orbit-frame transformation p_phi -> P_phi - S1z,mode together with tidal spin-orbit and spin-spin post-Newtonian terms. The resummed equilibrium mode amplitude b_a^(eq) encodes both the lag of the tidal bulge and the effective damping caused by gravitational-wave decay, and this same amplitude is used to compute frequency-dependent effective Love numbers for the radiation.

What would settle it

Run a high-resolution numerical relativity simulation of an equal-mass BNS with one star having a dimensionless anti-aligned spin near -0.2 and an equation of state similar to SLy, then measure the (2,2) mode phase at peak amplitude; if the phase difference between the full model and the no-tidal-spin model does not reproduce the claimed ~0.7 radians within the simulation's truncation error, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the finite-frequency tidal response of a neutron star cannot be fully captured by replacing the Love number with a frequency-dependent effective value in the radial interaction alone. The lagging tidal bulge carries a canonical spin — the tidal spin — which drives a Newtonian tidal torque and a post-Newtonian orbital hang-up, both of which feed back into the orbital phase. The paper constructs the EOB Hamiltonian so that the total angular momentum in the orbit frame, P_phi = p_phi + S1z,mode + S2z,mode, is treated as a canonical variable rather than being replaced by a circular-orbit relation; this step turns out to be essential for getting the back-reaction torque correct. The paper also derives dissipative gravitational-wave corrections that separate the equilibrium tide from the dynamical tide, introducing a distinct effective Love number for the radiation, kappa_eff,h. The claimed consequence is that dropping tidal spin leads to phase errors up to about 4 radians at peak amplitude, with the largest errors for rapidly and anti-aligned spinning stars.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the orbit remains quasi-circular throughout the inspiral, including after the f-mode is resonantly excited; the paper itself estimates an osculating eccentricity up to about 0.12 and notes that for background spins below about -0.5, dr/dt can become positive and the frequency evolution non-monotonic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Waveform templates that ignore tidal spin will accumulate systematic phase errors in the final cycles before merger, biasing estimates of tidal deformability and neutron star radius from observed BNS and NSBH signals.
  • The effective Love number prescription for the radial interaction must be supplemented with the tidal-torque back-reaction and a separate radiative effective Love number to remain faithful to numerical relativity in the late inspiral.
  • The model offers a first-principles explanation for part of the difference between previous analytical EOB models and numerical relativity during and after f-mode resonance.
  • Tidal spin can reach values comparable to typical spin priors used in gravitational-wave analysis (0.03–0.4), so it may matter even for binaries with non-spinning background stars.
  • For anti-aligned background spins below about -0.4, the model predicts strong dynamical tide effects, including non-monotonic frequency evolution, which cautions against the use of frequency-domain approximants in that part of parameter space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the claimed phase errors are real, tidal spin may be partially degenerate with the equation of state in measured waveforms, so neglecting it could bias EoS inference in ways that numerical-relativity calibration alone might not reveal.
  • The same torque mechanism should apply to tidal modes other than f-modes, such as g-modes or interface modes, and to eccentric binaries where resonance can be excited without rapid spin; extending this EOB machinery there may yield similarly large spin back-reactions.
  • The paper's picture, in which each neutron star's total spin magnitude evolves during inspiral, suggests a possible path to measuring the neutron star moment of inertia from gravitational-wave data alone by combining the resonance-condition measurement of background spin with the post-Newtonian measurement of total spin, provided the nonlinear frequency shifts can be controlled.
  • A direct consequence of the quasi-circular assumption is that quantitative waveform predictions inside or after resonance are uncertain; the authors' own eccentricity estimate suggests that the error from this assumption needs to be quantified with a model that allows at least moderate eccentricity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper constructs an effective-one-body (EOB) waveform model for nonprecessing binary neutron stars and neutron-star-black-hole binaries that explicitly includes the evolving canonical angular momentum of the tidally excited f-modes, termed the tidal spin. The model derives the Newtonian tidal torque, incorporates relativistic tidal spin-orbit and spin-spin couplings, resums the dynamics into an EOB Hamiltonian, and adds 1PN finite-frequency corrections to the gravitational-wave radiation multipoles. The authors report phase discrepancies of 0.3 to 4 radians at the waveform peak when the tidal spin is omitted, and they claim that the difference between their full model and a no-tidal-spin version resembles the difference between numerical relativity and the effective-Love-number model of [18].

Significance. If the tidal-spin back-reaction is as large as claimed, this is a physically important missing ingredient in current analytical BNS/NSBH templates, with direct consequences for parameter estimation and equation-of-state inference. The derivation is transparent and largely first-principles: the tidal spin is not fitted to numerical relativity, the mode-amplitude formalism is well motivated, the source code is publicly available, and the model extends into high anti-aligned spin regions that numerical relativity has not yet covered. However, the central validation claim is currently supported only by a qualitative visual comparison, and the paper itself defers direct numerical-relativity validation; the significance is therefore conditional on the promised quantitative checks.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V and Fig. 1] The headline claim that tidal spin is a necessary ingredient for faithful BNS/NSBH templates rests on a qualitative visual resemblance between the full-model/no-tidal-spin difference and the numerical-relativity-vs-[18] difference. This is not a quantitative comparison: no mismatch or faithfulness measure is given, and the two comparisons use different physical setups (equal-mass SLy BNS versus the NSBH of [18]'s Fig. 3, with the adopted Love number about half of [18]'s, as acknowledged in footnote 7). Moreover, the f-mode frequencies and overlap parameters are taken from Table I of [18], which were adjusted to match numerical relativity and deviate from the universal f-mode-Love-number relation (Sec. V). If those parameters already encode missing nonlinear physics, the attribution of the improved agreement to tidal spin is not isolated. I recommend a quantitative comparison for matched parameters, or at minimum a sensitivity test varying the f-mode parameters, before the "necessary ingredient" conclusion is stated.
  2. [Sec. IVB and Sec. III] The paper explicitly states in Sec. IVB that once the f-mode is resonantly excited the orbit cannot remain quasi-circular, with osculating eccentricities up to about 0.12 and, for background spin chi_1z less than about -0.5, non-monotonic r and frequency evolution. Yet the EOB Hamiltonian, the circular-orbit initial conditions (Eqs. 112-113), and the r(omega) relation used for the radiative multipoles (Eqs. 127 and 140-144) all assume quasi-circular orbits. The claimed phase errors of 0.3-4 radians are therefore computed in exactly the regime where the quasi-circular assumption is acknowledged to be violated. The impact of this violation on the predicted phase shifts and waveform shapes needs to be quantified, either with an eccentric-capable extension or with direct numerical-relativity comparisons, before the quantitative claims can be considered established.
  3. [Sec. V] The direct-validation gap is load-bearing for the paper's central claim. The only evidence of comparison with numerical relativity is a private communication (footnote 9), which cannot be independently checked by a reader. Given that the paper is arguing for tidal spin as a necessary template ingredient, a quantitative, citable numerical-relativity comparison (or a public release of the comparison data) is needed, especially for the resonance and post-resonance regimes where the model is most different from previous effective-Love-number models.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction and Fig. 1] The text near Fig. 1 states a dimensionless background spin of chi_1z = -0.25 for the bottom panel, while the Fig. 1 caption and Sec. IVA use chi_1z = -0.2; please reconcile the values.
  2. [Sec. IIB] "For future convince" should be "For future convenience".
  3. [Sec. V] There is a typo in "as the orbit evovles".
  4. [Footnote 6] The criticism of the LAL implementation would be easier to verify if the specific LAL version or commit were identified.
  5. [Fig. 3] Please check the quoted f-mode resonance frequency of 1370 Hz for the chi_1z = -0.2 model against the resonance frequencies shown in Figs. 4 and 6, to ensure the figures are mutually consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the tidal-spin phase shifts are computed from a constructed Hamiltonian, not fitted, and the NR-resemblance claim is qualitative with validation deferred.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The tidal spin is defined as the mode canonical angular momentum (Eqs. 24 and 35), and the back-reaction torque is obtained from the orbit-frame Hamiltonian (Eqs. 33 and 50) rather than imposed as an input. The headline phase-error numbers (0.3-4 rad) come from comparing the full model with a version in which S1z,mode is zeroed only in the orbital evolution; both versions share the same f-mode parameters taken from [18], so the comparison isolates the torque and orbital-hang-up terms and is not a fit to the predicted quantity. The f-mode frequencies and overlaps from [18] are external, NR-informed inputs, but they are not tuned to the predictions made here, and the paper explicitly defers direct NR validation (Sec. V), relying for its resemblance claim on qualitative visual inspection and a private communication (footnote 9). That is a validation limitation, not circularity. Self-citations to [46] supply the resummation and eccentricity estimates, but these are published, separately derived results, and the paper re-derives the leading torque in Sec. IIC, so the argument does not reduce to an unverified self-citation chain. The quasi-circular-orbit caveat in Sec. IVB similarly limits quantitative reliability without making the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on physical inputs for neutron star structure, specifically f-mode frequencies, Love numbers, and rotation coefficients, mostly adopted from [18]. It also uses the authors' prior Newtonian tidal-spin framework from [46]. No new particles or forces are introduced. The quasi-circular orbit and canonical-spin assumptions are the most significant modeling choices that could fail in the astrophysically interesting high-spin regime.

free parameters (4)
  • f-mode frequency M1*omega_a0 for l=2 = 0.07934
    Adopted from Table I of [18]. Sets the f-mode resonance location; the authors note the [18] frequencies may not follow the universal relation with the Love number, so this external value strongly controls the tidal-spin phase shift.
  • f-mode frequency M1*omega_a0 for l=3 = 0.1067
    Adopted from Table I of [18] for the octupole tide; enters the l=3 tidal corrections in the radiation multipoles.
  • structural constant C_a for l=2 f-mode = -1/4
    From [18] eq. (5.7). Determines the rotation-induced shift of the f-mode frequency and therefore the spin dependence of the resonance condition.
  • spin-induced quadrupole coefficient C_ES2 = 6
    From [18], entering the spin-quadrupole part of the EOB Hamiltonian. Relevant for waveform accuracy but secondary to the tidal-spin mechanism.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Phase-space mode expansion and orthogonality relations from Schenk et al. [44] apply to the tidally perturbed neutron star.
    The fluid perturbation theory and the mode orthogonality condition in Eqs. (6)-(12) are taken from the stellar oscillation literature and underpin the whole modal expansion.
  • domain assumption Only f-modes are included; g-modes, p-modes, interface modes and nonlinear mode coupling are neglected.
    The authors state this in Sec. V and note that nonlinear hydrodynamics may shift the f-mode frequency, so the single-mode linear treatment is an approximation.
  • domain assumption Background spins are aligned or anti-aligned with the orbital angular momentum and remain constant in the canonical picture.
    The model does not treat precession, and the background spin S1 is held fixed. The paper discusses general spin orientation only in future-work remarks.
  • domain assumption Quasi-circular orbits are assumed throughout, including after f-mode resonance.
    Sec. IV B acknowledges this and shows the osculating eccentricity can reach about 0.12, with non-monotonic radial motion for chi_1z less than about -0.5. The r(omega) relations and radiation multipoles rely on this assumption.
  • domain assumption The effective damping of the tide is dominated by orbital decay; fluid dissipation is negligible.
    The mode amplitude's imaginary part is generated by the GW-induced orbital shrinkage, not by fluid viscosity or other dissipation. The authors cite prior estimates that fluid damping is orders of magnitude smaller.
  • domain assumption Canonical spin gives the correct physical torque and angular-momentum bookkeeping.
    Appendix A argues the torque computed from canonical spin matches the physical torque, but notes the canonical spin magnitude can be about twice the physical spin. This is a nontrivial assumption about how to interpret and compare the model's spin.
  • ad hoc to paper The resummed equilibrium mode amplitude in Eq. (111) accurately describes the mode through resonance.
    The resummation extends a geometric series approximation and is justified by comparison with the Newtonian solution in [46]. It is an approximation rather than an exact solution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JTUHSRYN

@misc{pith2026250113064,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JTUHSRYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13064}
}
read the original abstract

Tidal interactions in a coalescing binary neutron star (BNS) or neutron star-black hole (NSBH) system driven by gravitational wave (GW) radiation contain precious information about physics both at extreme density and in the highly relativistic regime. In the late inspiral stage, where the tidal effects are the strongest, dynamical corrections to the tidal response become significant. Previous analyses model the finite-frequency correction through the effective Love number approach, which only accounts for the correction in the radial interaction but ignores the lag in the tidal bulge behind the companion due to the continuous orbital shrinkage. The lag provides a torque, causing the star's spin to change over time. We dub the evolving component of the spin the tidal spin, whose dimensionless value can reach 0.03-0.4 depending on how rapidly the background star rotates. We present an effective-one-body (EOB) waveform model for BNSs and NSBHs incorporating the tidal spin, particularly its back reaction to the orbit due to the Newtonian tidal torque and the relativistic orbital hang-up. Beyond the conservative dynamics, we also derive the corrections to the dissipative radiation due to finite-frequency effects to the first post-Newtonian order. Depending on the star's background spin, the phase error in the time-domain waveform due to ignoring the tidal spin ranges from 0.3 to 4 radians at the waveform's peak amplitude. The difference in the waveforms with and without the tidal spin remarkably resembles the difference between previous effective Love number models and numerical relativity simulations, underscoring the significance of tidal spin in the construction of faithful models. Our model further extends the description of dynamics in the high-background spin regions of the parameter space that are yet to be covered by numerical simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13064 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Normalized (2,2) GW mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dimensionless tidal spin for NSs with different background spins. Each curve is terminated when the equal-mass binary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Deformed NS surfaces at two different instants in the orbit frame where the companion is always on the positive x-axis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Top: detuning of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparisons of different terms in the expanded EOB Hamiltonian. All terms are normalized by the reduced mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as the system shown in the lower panel of Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Osculating eccentricity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonlinear hydrodynamics in spinning neutron stars: Theoretical universal relations and equilibrium solutions

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Affine-model hydrodynamics shows three-wave NS tidal couplings are fixed by linear Love numbers, yet omit ~1.7 rad of GW phase per star by merger; four-wave terms cannot lock f-modes.

  2. Oscillations of Dissipative Neutron Stars: The Impact of Hyperonic Reaction Rates

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finite hyperonic reaction rates, encoded as a complex sound speed, damp neutron-star f-modes and remove hyperonic g-modes before their restoring force vanishes, producing a tidal lag.

  3. The error budget of binary neutron star merger simulations for configurations with high spin

    gr-qc 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For highly spinning (chi=0.5) binary neutron stars, evolution code choice is the largest numerical waveform error, and current analytical models disagree with numerical relativity beyond that error after the stars touch.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [18]

    Damour, B

    T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and A. Nagar, Improved resummation of post-Newtonian multipolar waveforms from circularized compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D79, 064004 (2009), arXiv:0811.2069 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2009

  2. [1]

    The two approaches are equivalent when only the f-modes are considered, yet our model is more flexible in incorporating other modes (e.g., gravity and pressure modes)

    We evolve each mode’s amplitude instead ofQij mode and Pij. The two approaches are equivalent when only the f-modes are considered, yet our model is more flexible in incorporating other modes (e.g., gravity and pressure modes). For a spinning background, the configuration-space formulation in [18] leads to coupled equations of motion for different modes. ...

  3. [2]

    For the frame dragging terms [H (eff) fr and H (eff) t,LS], we do not replace Pϕ by µr√u[1 + ...] in order to capture the correct back-reaction torque (as discussed in Sec

    We usePϕ = pϕ + S1z,mode + S2z,mode as the canonical momentum conjugate toϕ in the orbit frame instead of the pp onepϕ. For the frame dragging terms [H (eff) fr and H (eff) t,LS], we do not replace Pϕ by µr√u[1 + ...] in order to capture the correct back-reaction torque (as discussed in Sec. IIC). In fact,H (eff) fr does not explicitly show up in our code...

  4. [3]

    We included the leading-order tidal spin-background spin interaction (Eq. 65). Compared to [18], we additionally have S1z,mode interacting with M1’s own background spinχ1z

  5. [4]

    Dietrich, S

    T. Dietrich, S. Bernuzzi, B. Brügmann, M. Ujevic, and W. Tichy, Numerical relativity simulations of precessing binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D97, 064002 (2018), arXiv:1712.02992 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [5]

    This is achieved by scaling length and time by1/M, frequency byM, energy and linear momentum by1/µ, and angular momentum by1/(µM )

    Dynamics defined by the EOB Hamiltonian In the numerical code, it is convenient to evolve the system in dimensionless units. This is achieved by scaling length and time by1/M, frequency byM, energy and linear momentum by1/µ, and angular momentum by1/(µM ). In particular, the pp part of the dynamics is scaled as r, pr, ϕ, pϕ, t, H(EOB), H(eff) or → r M , p...

  7. [6]

    (110) The detuning is to be compared with Eqs

    Equilibrium solutions and initial conditions The equilibrium solution of the mode, prior to resonance, can be obtained by settingdba/dˆt = 0, which leads to b(eq,EOB,0) a = ∂H (EOB)/∂Hint ωa0va ∆(EOB) a , (109) where ∆(EOB) a = ∂H (EOB) ∂Hmode (ωa + maΩ1) + ma ∂H (EOB) ∂S1z,mode . (110) The detuning is to be compared with Eqs. (42) and (70). We further ap...

  8. [7]

    D. Lai, F. A. Rasio, and S. L. Shapiro, Equilibrium, Stability, and Orbital Evolution of Close Binary Systems, ApJ423, 344 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9307032 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 1994

Show all 129 references
  1. [8]

    2q∗ aqaωa⟨ξa, iˆez × ξa⟩ + X b 2q∗ aqbΩ ⟨ˆez × ξa, ˆez × ξb⟩ # , ≃ +X a

    This is compensated by the fact that we used a BNS system whereas [18] assumed an NSBH. 26 −0.2 0.0 0.2 Re [DL M h22 ] 1 2 3 4∆ φgw(t) [rad] Full model No tidal spin in the orbital evolution No tidal torque but with orbital hang-up 6800 6900 7000 7100 7200 ˆt 800 1000 1200 140...

  2. [9]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and et al., GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and et al., GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Hotokezaka, K

    K. Hotokezaka, K. Kyutoku, H. Okawa, and M. Shibata, Exploring tidal effects of coalescing binary neutron stars in numerical relativity. II. Long-term simulations, Phys. Rev. D91, 064060 (2015), arXiv:1502.03457 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Damour, A

    T. Damour, A. Nagar, and L. Villain, Measurability of the tidal polarizability of neutron stars in late-inspiral gravitational- wave signals, Phys. Rev. D85, 123007 (2012), arXiv:1203.4352 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Foucart, M

    F. Foucart, M. D. Duez, T. Hinderer, J. Caro, A. R. Williamson, M. Boyle, A. Buonanno, R. Haas, D. A. Hemberger, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Gravitational waveforms from spectral Einstein code simulations: Neutron star-neutron star and low-mass black hole-n...

    2019 arXiv

  7. [14]

    D. Lai, F. A. Rasio, and S. L. Shapiro, Hydrodynamic Instability and Coalescence of Binary Neutron Stars, ApJ420, 811 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9304027 [astro-ph]

    1994 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Nagar, S

    A. Nagar, S. Bernuzzi, W. Del Pozzo, G. Riemenschneider, S. Akcay, G. Carullo, P. Fleig, S. Babak, K. W. Tsang, M. Colleoni, F. Messina, G. Pratten, D. Radice, P. Rettegno, M. Agathos, E. Fauchon-Jones, M. Hannam, S. Husa, T. Dietrich, P. Cerdá-Duran, J. A. Font, F. Pannarale,...

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    in” replaced by “or

    and corresponds to a 1 PN correction to the interaction energy that is not absorbed byA. When expanded, the EOB Hamiltonian needs to match the PN one up to a canonical transformation with generator g, H (EOB) in = H (PN) in + {H (PN) in , g} + 1 2 {{H (PN) in , g}, g} + ... (8...

  10. [17]

    É. É. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron-star tidal Love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Hinderer, B

    T. Hinderer, B. D. Lackey, R. N. Lang, and J. S. Read, Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral, Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010), arXiv:0911.3535 [astro-ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and G. Faye, Effective action approach to higher-order relativistic tidal interactions in binary systems and their effective one body description, Phys. Rev. D85, 124034 (2012), arXiv:1202.3565 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Gravitational self-force corrections to two-body tidal interactions and the effective one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D90, 124037 (2014), arXiv:1409.6933 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bernuzzi, A

    S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, T. Dietrich, and T. Damour, Modeling the Dynamics of Tidally Interacting Binary Neutron Stars up to the Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 161103 (2015), arXiv:1412.4553 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    C. J. Krüger and K. D. Kokkotas, Fast Rotating Relativistic Stars: Spectra and Stability without Approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 111106 (2020), arXiv:1910.08370 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Steinhoff, T

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno, and A. Taracchini, Dynamical tides in general relativity: Effective action and effective-one-body Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. D94, 104028 (2016), arXiv:1608.01907 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hinderer, A

    T. Hinderer, A. Taracchini, F. Foucart, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. Duez, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, B. Szilagyi, K. Hotokezaka, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata, and C. W. Carpenter, Effects of Neutron-Star Dynamic Tides on GravitationalWaveformswithintheEffective-On...

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Steinhoff, T

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, T. Dietrich, and F. Foucart, Spin effects on neutron star fundamental-mode dynamical tides: Phenomenology and comparison to numerical simulations, Physical Review Research3, 033129 (2021), arXiv:2103.06100 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Ranjan Mohanty, U

    S. Ranjan Mohanty, U. Mali, H. C. Das, B. Kumar, and P. Landry, Astrophysical constraints on neutron starf-modes with a nonparametric equation of state representation, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.16689 (2024), arXiv:2410.16689 [astro- ph.HE]. 34

    2024

  20. [28]

    T. K. Chan, Y. H. Sham, P. T. Leung, and L. M. Lin, Multipolar universal relations between f -mode frequency and tidal deformability of compact stars, Phys. Rev. D90, 124023 (2014), arXiv:1408.3789 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    B. K. Pradhan, A. Vijaykumar, and D. Chatterjee, Impact of updated multipole love numbers andf-love universal relations in the context of binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D107, 023010 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    D. D. Doneva, E. Gaertig, K. D. Kokkotas, and C. Krüger, Gravitational wave asteroseismology of fast rotating neutron stars with realistic equations of state, Phys. Rev. D88, 044052 (2013), arXiv:1305.7197 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. Abac, T. Dietrich, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and M. Ujevic, New and robust gravitational-waveform model for high- mass-ratio binary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal effects, Phys. Rev. D109, 024062 (2024), arXiv:2311.07456 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    C. J. Krüger and S. H. Völkel, Rapidly rotating neutron stars: Universal relations and EOS inference, Phys. Rev. D108, 124056 (2023), arXiv:2309.05643 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    H. Yu, N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, J. Kwon, and T. Venumadhav, Beyond the linear tide: impact of the non-linear tidal response of neutron stars on gravitational waveforms from binary inspirals, MNRAS519, 4325 (2023), arXiv:2211.07002 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    K. J. Kwon, H. Yu, and T. Venumadhav, Resonance Locking of Anharmonicg-Modes in Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.03831 (2024), arXiv:2410.03831 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Dietrich, S

    T. Dietrich, S. Bernuzzi, and W. Tichy, Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitational waveforms constructed from high-resolution numerical relativity simulations, Phys. Rev. D96, 121501 (2017), arXiv:1706.02969 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Kawaguchi, K

    K. Kawaguchi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, M. Shibata, and K. Taniguchi, Frequency-domain gravitational waveform models for inspiraling binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D97, 044044 (2018), arXiv:1802.06518 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Dietrich, A

    T. Dietrich, A. Samajdar, S. Khan, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, R. Dudi, and W. Tichy, Improving the NRTidal model for binary neutron star systems, Phys. Rev. D100, 044003 (2019), arXiv:1905.06011 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Gamba, M

    R. Gamba, M. Breschi, S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, W. Cook, G. Doulis, F. Fabbri, N. Ortiz, A. Poudel, A. Rashti, W. Tichy, and M. Ujevic, Analytically improved and numerical-relativity informed effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:230...

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Pnigouras, F

    P. Pnigouras, F. Gittins, A. Nanda, N. Andersson, and D. I. Jones, The dynamical tides of spinning Newtonian stars, MNRAS 527, 8409 (2024), arXiv:2205.07577 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Schmidt and T

    P. Schmidt and T. Hinderer, Frequency domain model of f -mode dynamic tides in gravitational waveforms from compact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D100, 021501 (2019), arXiv:1905.00818 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Andersson and P

    N. Andersson and P. Pnigouras, Exploring the effective tidal deformability of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D101, 083001 (2020), arXiv:1906.08982 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Andersson and P

    N. Andersson and P. Pnigouras, The phenomenology of dynamical neutron star tides, MNRAS503, 533 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Passamonti, N

    A. Passamonti, N. Andersson, and P. Pnigouras, Dynamical tides in superfluid neutron stars, MNRAS514, 1494 (2022), arXiv:2202.05161 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gamba and S

    R. Gamba and S. Bernuzzi, Resonant tides in binary neutron star mergers: Analytical-numerical relativity study, Phys. Rev. D107, 044014 (2023), arXiv:2207.13106 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kuan and K

    H.-J. Kuan and K. D. Kokkotas, Last three seconds: Packed message delivered by tides in binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D108, 063026 (2023), arXiv:2309.04622 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, H. O. Silva, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, Gravitoelectric dynamical tides at second post- Newtonian order, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 67 (2023), arXiv:2304.02030 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, and J. Burkart, An Instability due to the Nonlinear Coupling of p-modes to g-modes: Impli- cations for Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries, ApJ769, 121 (2013), arXiv:1302.2292 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Pitre and E

    T. Pitre and E. Poisson, General relativistic dynamical tides in binary inspirals without modes, Phys. Rev. D109, 064004 (2024), arXiv:2311.04075 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    B. K. Pradhan, T. Ghosh, D. Pathak, and D. Chatterjee, Cost of Inferred Nuclear Parameters toward the f-mode Dy- namical Tide in Binary Neutron Stars, ApJ966, 79 (2024), arXiv:2311.16561 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. L. Friedman and B. F. Schutz, Lagrangian perturbation theory of nonrelativistic fluids., ApJ221, 937 (1978)

    1978

  43. [51]

    Lai, Resonant Oscillations and Tidal Heating in Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars, MNRAS 270, 611 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404062 [astro-ph]

    D. Lai, Resonant Oscillations and Tidal Heating in Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars, MNRAS 270, 611 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404062 [astro-ph]

    1994 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. K. Schenk, P. Arras, É. É. Flanagan, S. A. Teukolsky, and I. Wasserman, Nonlinear mode coupling in rotating stars and the r-mode instability in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D65, 024001 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0101092 [gr-qc]

    2002 arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. Ma, H. Yu, and Y. Chen, Excitation of f -modes during mergers of spinning binary neutron star, Phys. Rev. D101, 123020 (2020), arXiv:2003.02373 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    H. Yu, P. Arras, and N. N. Weinberg, Dynamical tides during the inspiral of rapidly spinning neutron stars: Solutions beyond mode resonance, Phys. Rev. D110, 024039 (2024), arXiv:2404.00147 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091 [gr-qc]

    1999 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Venumadhav, A

    T. Venumadhav, A. Zimmerman, and C. M. Hirata, The Stability of Tidally Deformed Neutron Stars to Three- and Four-mode Coupling, ApJ781, 23 (2014), arXiv:1307.2890 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    N. N. Weinberg, Growth Rate of the Tidal p-Mode g-Mode Instability in Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars, ApJ819, 109 (2016), arXiv:1509.06975 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Essick, S

    R. Essick, S. Vitale, and N. N. Weinberg, Impact of the tidal p -g instability on the gravitational wave signal from coalescing binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D94, 103012 (2016), arXiv:1609.06362 [astro-ph.HE]. 35

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, N. N. Weinberg, and et al., Constraining the p -Mode-g -Mode Tidal Instability with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 061104 (2019), arXiv:1808.08676 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Arras and N

    P. Arras and N. N. Weinberg, Urca reactions during neutron star inspiral, MNRAS486, 1424 (2019), arXiv:1806.04163 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Abhishek Hegade K., J

    R. Abhishek Hegade K., J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Dissipative tidal effects to next-to-leading order and constraints on the dissipative tidal deformability using gravitational wave data, Phys. Rev. D110, 044041 (2024), arXiv:2407.02584 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Campanelli, C

    M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, and Y. Zlochower, Spinning-black-hole binaries: The orbital hang-up, Phys. Rev. D74, 041501 (2006)

    2006

  55. [63]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and et al., Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817, Physical Review X9, 011001 (2019), arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, A&A380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Lecture Notes on Stellar Oscillations(Institut for Fysik og Astronomi, Aarhus Universitet, 1998)

    J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, Lecture Notes on Stellar Oscillations(Institut for Fysik og Astronomi, Aarhus Universitet, 1998)

    1998

  58. [66]

    É. É. Flanagan and É. Racine, Gravitomagnetic resonant excitation of Rossby modes in coalescing neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D75, 044001 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0601029 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko,Classical mechanics(2002)

    2002

  60. [68]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  61. [69]

    Vines, É

    J. Vines, É. É. Flanagan, and T. Hinderer, Post-1-Newtonian tidal effects in the gravitational waveform from binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D83, 084051 (2011), arXiv:1101.1673 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [70]

    J. S. Read, B. D. Lackey, B. J. Owen, and J. L. Friedman, Constraints on a phenomenologically parametrized neutron-star equation of state, Phys. Rev. D79, 124032 (2009), arXiv:0812.2163 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Barausse, A

    E. Barausse, A. Buonanno, and A. Le Tiec, Complete nonspinning effective-one-body metric at linear order in the mass ratio, Phys. Rev. D85, 064010 (2012), arXiv:1111.5610 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  64. [72]

    H.-J. Kuan, K. Kiuchi, and M. Shibata, Tidal Resonance in Binary Neutron Star Inspirals: A High-Precision Study in Numerical Relativity, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.16850 (2024), arXiv:2411.16850 [hep-ph]

    2024

  65. [73]

    G. I. Ogilvie, Tidal Dissipation in Stars and Giant Planets, ARA&A52, 171 (2014), arXiv:1406.2207 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Khalil, J

    M. Khalil, J. Steinhoff, J. Vines, and A. Buonanno, Fourth post-Newtonian effective-one-body Hamiltonians with generic spins, Phys. Rev. D101, 104034 (2020), arXiv:2003.04469 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    56 and 60) to 1 PN order

    who derived the global-frame system multipole moments (QL sys for mass andSL sys for current) in terms of general body-frame moments (in particular,Qij mode and Sij mode; Eq. 56 and 60) to 1 PN order. Higher PN order results are recently derived in [76], yet we find the 1 PN a...

  68. [76]

    Blanchet, A

    L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno, and A. Le Tiec, First law of mechanics for black hole binaries with spins, Phys. Rev. D87, 024030 (2013), arXiv:1211.1060 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Damour, Coalescence of two spinning black holes: An effective one-body approach, Phys

    T. Damour, Coalescence of two spinning black holes: An effective one-body approach, Phys. Rev. D64, 124013 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103018 [gr-qc]

    2001 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Buonanno, Y

    A. Buonanno, Y. Chen, and T. Damour, Transition from inspiral to plunge in precessing binaries of spinning black holes, Phys. Rev. D74, 104005 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0508067 [gr-qc]

    2006 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Final spin of a coalescing black-hole binary: An effective-one-body approach, Phys. Rev. D 76, 044003 (2007), arXiv:0704.3550 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schäfer, Effective one body approach to the dynamics of two spinning black holes with next-to-leading order spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. D78, 024009 (2008), arXiv:0803.0915 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, M. Boyle, L. T. Buchman, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D84, 124052 (2011), arXiv:1106.1021 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  74. [82]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO Algorithm Library - LALSuite, free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    J. E. Vines and É. É. Flanagan, First-post-Newtonian quadrupole tidal interactions in binary systems, Phys. Rev. D88, 024046 (2013), arXiv:1009.4919 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [84]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, H. O. Silva, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, Renormalizing Love: tidal effects at the third post-Newtonian order, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 188 (2024), arXiv:2308.01865 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Blanchet, Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Living Reviews in Relativity 17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    L. Blanchet, Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Living Reviews in Relativity 17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Gopakumar, Gravitational recoil during binary black hole coalescence using the effective one body approach, Phys. Rev. D73, 124006 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0602117 [gr-qc]

    2006 arXiv

  79. [87]

    L. E. Kidder, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Spin effects in the inspiral of coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 47, R4183 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9211025 [gr-qc]

    1993 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Barausse and A

    E. Barausse and A. Buonanno, Improved effective-one-body Hamiltonian for spinning black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 81, 084024 (2010), arXiv:0912.3517 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Barausse and A

    E. Barausse and A. Buonanno, Extending the effective-one-body Hamiltonian of black-hole binaries to include next-to- next-to-leading spin-orbit couplings, Phys. Rev. D84, 104027 (2011), arXiv:1107.2904 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Taracchini, Y

    A. Taracchini, Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, E. Barausse, M. Boyle, T. Chu, G. Lovelace, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms, Phys. Rev. D86, 024011 (2012), arXiv:1202.0790 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Poisson, Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: The quadrupole-moment term, Phys

    E. Poisson, Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: The quadrupole-moment term, Phys. Rev. D57, 5287 36 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9709032 [gr-qc]

    1998 arXiv

  84. [92]

    N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Testing the Binary Black Hole Nature of a Compact Binary Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 091101 (2017), arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Takátsy, B

    J. Takátsy, B. Kocsis, and P. Kovács, Observability of dynamical tides in merging eccentric neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D110, 103043 (2024), arXiv:2407.17560 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Haberland, J

    M. Haberland, J. Steinhoff, and A. Buonanno, Private communication

  87. [95]

    Reisenegger and P

    A. Reisenegger and P. Goldreich, Excitation of Neutron Star Normal Modes during Binary Inspiral, ApJ426, 688 (1994)

    1994

  88. [96]

    Yu and N

    H. Yu and N. N. Weinberg, Resonant tidal excitation of superfluid neutron stars in coalescing binaries, MNRAS464, 2622 (2017), arXiv:1610.00745 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Yu and N

    H. Yu and N. N. Weinberg, Dynamical tides in coalescing superfluid neutron star binaries with hyperon cores and their detectability with third-generation gravitational-wave detectors, MNRAS470, 350 (2017), arXiv:1705.04700 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [98]

    H.-J. Kuan, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, General-relativistic treatment of tidal g-mode resonances in coalescing binaries of neutron stars - I. Theoretical framework and crust breaking, MNRAS506, 2985 (2021), arXiv:2106.16123 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [99]

    H.-J. Kuan, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, General-relativistic treatment of tidal g-mode resonances in coalescing binaries of neutron stars - II. As triggers for precursor flares of short gamma-ray bursts, MNRAS508, 1732 (2021), arXiv:2107.00533 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  92. [100]

    A. R. Counsell, F. Gittins, N. Andersson, and P. Pnigouras, Neutron star g modes in the relativistic Cowling approxima- tion, MNRAS 536, 1967 (2025), arXiv:2409.20178 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Tsang, J

    D. Tsang, J. S. Read, T. Hinderer, A. L. Piro, and R. Bondarescu, Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 011102 (2012), arXiv:1110.0467 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Z. Pan, Z. Lyu, B. Bonga, N. Ortiz, and H. Yang, Probing Crust Meltdown in Inspiraling Binary Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 201102 (2020), arXiv:2003.03330 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Passamonti, N

    A. Passamonti, N. Andersson, and P. Pnigouras, Dynamical tides in neutron stars: the impact of the crust, MNRAS504, 1273 (2021), arXiv:2012.09637 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  96. [104]

    A. G. Suvorov, H.-J. Kuan, and K. D. Kokkotas, Premerger phenomena in neutron-star binary coalescences, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.16283 (2024), arXiv:2408.16283 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    W. C. G. Ho and D. Lai, Resonant tidal excitations of rotating neutron stars in coalescing binaries, MNRAS308, 153 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812116 [astro-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Poisson, Gravitomagnetic tidal resonance in neutron-star binary inspirals, Phys

    E. Poisson, Gravitomagnetic tidal resonance in neutron-star binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104028 (2020), arXiv:2003.10427 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  99. [107]

    P. K. Gupta, J. Steinhoff, and T. Hinderer, Relativistic effective action of dynamical gravitomagnetic tides for slowly rotating neutron stars, Physical Review Research3, 013147 (2021), arXiv:2011.03508 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  100. [108]

    S. Ma, H. Yu, and Y. Chen, Detecting resonant tidal excitations of Rossby modes in coalescing neutron-star binaries with third-generation gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D103, 063020 (2021), arXiv:2010.03066 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Ossokine, A

    S. Ossokine, A. Buonanno, S. Marsat, R. Cotesta, S. Babak, T. Dietrich, R. Haas, I. Hinder, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. Pürrer, C. J. Woodford, M. Boyle, L. E. Kidder, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szilágyi, Multipolar effective-one-body waveforms for precessing binary black holes: Construction...

    2020 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Akcay, R

    S. Akcay, R. Gamba, and S. Bernuzzi, Hybrid post-Newtonian effective-one-body scheme for spin-precessing compact- binary waveforms up to merger, Phys. Rev. D103, 024014 (2021), arXiv:2005.05338 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estellés, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, SEOBNRv5PHM: Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2303.18...

    2023 arXiv

  104. [112]

    H. Yu, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Accurate and efficient waveform model for precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 064059 (2023), arXiv:2306.08774 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  105. [113]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Zevin, C. Pankow, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Illuminating Black Hole Binary Formation Channels with Spins in Advanced LIGO, ApJ832, L2 (2016), arXiv:1609.05916 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Racine, Analysis of spin precession in binary black hole systems including quadrupole-monopole interaction, Phys

    É. Racine, Analysis of spin precession in binary black hole systems including quadrupole-monopole interaction, Phys. Rev. D78, 044021 (2008), arXiv:0803.1820 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  107. [115]

    LaHaye, H

    M. LaHaye, H. Yang, B. Bonga, and Z. Lyu, Efficient fully precessing gravitational waveforms for binaries with neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D108, 043018 (2023), arXiv:2212.04657 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  108. [116]

    R. Gold, S. Bernuzzi, M. Thierfelder, B. Brügmann, and F. Pretorius, Eccentric binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 86, 121501 (2012), arXiv:1109.5128 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Chirenti, R

    C. Chirenti, R. Gold, and M. C. Miller, Gravitational Waves from F-modes Excited by the Inspiral of Highly Eccentric Neutron Star Binaries, ApJ837, 67 (2017), arXiv:1612.07097 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  110. [118]

    H. Yang, W. E. East, V. Paschalidis, F. Pretorius, and R. F. P. Mendes, Evolution of highly eccentric binary neutron stars including tidal effects, Phys. Rev. D98, 044007 (2018), arXiv:1806.00158 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Vick and D

    M. Vick and D. Lai, Tidal effects in eccentric coalescing neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D 100, 063001 (2019), arXiv:1906.08780 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Parisi and R

    A. Parisi and R. Sturani, Gravitational waves from neutron star excitations in a binary inspiral, Phys. Rev. D97, 043015 (2018), arXiv:1705.04751 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Yang, Inspiralling eccentric binary neutron stars: Orbital motion and tidal resonance, Phys

    H. Yang, Inspiralling eccentric binary neutron stars: Orbital motion and tidal resonance, Phys. Rev. D100, 064023 (2019), arXiv:1904.11089 [gr-qc]. 37

    2019 arXiv

  114. [122]

    J.-S.WangandD.Lai,Evolutionofinspirallingneutronstarbinaries: Effectsoftidalinteractionsandorbitaleccentricities, Phys. Rev. D102, 083005 (2020), arXiv:2009.08300 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Hinderer and S

    T. Hinderer and S. Babak, Foundations of an effective-one-body model for coalescing binaries on eccentric orbits, Phys. Rev. D96, 104048 (2017), arXiv:1707.08426 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Khalil, A

    M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, Radiation-reaction force and multipolar waveforms for eccentric, spin-aligned binaries in the effective-one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D104, 024046 (2021), arXiv:2104.11705 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Nagar, A

    A. Nagar, A. Bonino, and P. Rettegno, Effective one-body multipolar waveform model for spin-aligned, quasicircular, eccentric, hyperbolic black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D103, 104021 (2021), arXiv:2101.08624 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  118. [126]

    X. Liu, Z. Cao, and Z.-H. Zhu, A higher-multipole gravitational waveform model for an eccentric binary black holes based on the effective-one-body-numerical-relativity formalism, Classical and Quantum Gravity 39, 035009 (2022), arXiv:2102.08614 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, I-Love-Q: Unexpected Universal Relations for Neutron Stars and Quark Stars, Science341, 365 (2013), arXiv:1302.4499 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Pratten, P

    G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, and N. Williams, Impact of Dynamical Tides on the Reconstruction of the Neutron Star Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 081102 (2022), arXiv:2109.07566 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Gupta, K

    A. Gupta, K. G. Arun, E. Barausse, L. Bernard, E. Berti, S. A. Bhat, A. Buonanno, V. Cardoso, S. Y. Cheung, T. A. Clarke, S. Datta, A. Dhani, J. María Ezquiaga, I. Gupta, N. Guttman, T. Hinderer, Q. Hu, J. Janquart, N. K. Johnson- McDaniel, R. Kashyap, N. V. Krishnendu, P. D. ...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.