REVIEW 1 cited by
Dark Chiral Phase Transition Driven by Chemical Potential and its Gravitational Wave Test
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this article, for the first time, we explore the scenario that the dark-QCD sector has a large chemical potential $\mu$ (on the order of magnitude of temperature) of dark quarks. It leads to a complex-valued Polyakov loop and tilts the partial confinement effect, driving the dark-QCD phase transition to a first-order one in the early universe. We present a toy model via the Affleck-Dine mechanism that could generate degenerate dark quarks. Our study, in the framework of PNJL, focuses on the dynamical impacts of a large chemical potential on the chiral phase transition without turning on the KMT instanton term. We plot the phase diagram of the dark-QCD in the chiral limit. The resulting first-order phase transition actually refers to a chiral phase transition, with the transition to the confinement vacuum being a cross-over. Following the phase diagram, we find that increasing $\mu$ can considerably prolong the duration of the phase transition and also the release of latent heat, which together make the cosmic dark-QCD phase transition at the critical temperature above 1 GeV and below 100 GeV produce gravitational wave signal in the intermediate frequency band, which is well probable in space detectors such as BBO
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can a secluded self-interacting dark sector generate detectable gravitational waves?
In a secluded self-interacting dark sector with a dark U(1)' and dark radiation, existing Neff and Lyman-alpha limits remove nearly all gravitational-wave-detectable parameter space; one charge assignment keeps a smal...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.