Pith. sign in

REVIEW 48 references

Testing the universality of quantum gravity theories with cosmic messengers in the context of DSR theories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.16141 v2 pith:5IJGJUOQ submitted 2025-01-27 gr-qc

Marco Danilo Claudio Torri This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords gravityquantumtheoriescovarianceformulationmodelsseveraladditionally
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently there have been several studies devoted to the investigation of the fate of fundamental relativistic symmetries at the foreseen unification of gravity and quantum regime, that is the Planck scale. In order to preserve covariance of the formulation even if in an amended formulation, new mathematical tools are required. In this work, we consider DSR theories that modify covariance by introducing a non-trivial structure in momentum space. Additionally, we explore the possibility of investigating both universal quantum gravity corrections and scenarios where different particle species are corrected differently within the framework of these models. Several astroparticle phenomena are then analyzed to test the phenomenological predictions of DSR models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review,

    A. Addazi, J. Alvarez-Muniz, R. Alves Batista, G. Amelino-Camelia, V. Antonelli, M. Arzano, M. Asorey, J. L. Atteia, S. Bahamonde and F. Bajardi, et al., “Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125 (2022), 103948 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103948 [arXiv:2111.05659 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Paunkovic and M

    N. Paunkovic and M. Vojinovic, Universe 8 (2022) no.11, 598 doi:10.3390/universe8110598 [arXiv:2210.00133 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Lorentz violating extension of the standard model,

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, “Lorentz violating extension of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), 116002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116002 [arXiv:hep-ph/9809521 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    CPT violation and the standard model,

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, “CPT violation and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997), 6760-6774 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6760 [arXiv:hep-ph/9703464 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 1997

  5. [5]

    The principle of relative local- ity,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman and L. Smolin, “The principle of relative local- ity,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011), 084010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.084010 [arXiv:1101.0931 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Doubly-Special Relativity: Facts, Myths and Some Key Open Issues,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, “Doubly-Special Relativity: Facts, Myths and Some Key Open Issues,” Symme- try 2 (2010), 230-271 doi:10.3390/sym2010230 [arXiv:1003.3942 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Homogeneously Modified Special relativity (HMSR): A new possible way to introduce an isotropic Lorentz invariance violation in particle standard model,

    M. D. C. Torri, V. Antonelli and L. Miramonti, “Homogeneously Modified Special relativity (HMSR): A new possible way to introduce an isotropic Lorentz invariance violation in particle standard model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.9, 808 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7301-7 [arXiv:1906.05595 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation,

    V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, “Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011), 11-31 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.11 [arXiv:0801.0287 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2011

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Amelino-Camelia, M

    G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Palmisano, M. Ronco and G. D’Amico, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) no.02, 2050017 doi:10.1142/S0218271820500170 [arXiv:1910.05997 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Amelino-Camelia, Symmetry 4 (2012), 344-378 doi:10.3390/sym4030344 [arXiv:1111.5643 [hep-ph]]

    G. Amelino-Camelia, Symmetry 4 (2012), 344-378 doi:10.3390/sym4030344 [arXiv:1111.5643 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance,

    S. R. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, “High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999), 116008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.116008 [arXiv:hep-ph/9812418 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Searching for New Physics with Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays,

    F. W. Stecker and S. T. Scully, “Searching for New Physics with Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays,” New J. Phys. 11 (2009), 085003 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/8/085003 [arXiv:0906.1735 [astro-ph.HE]]. 20

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Quantum Gravity Phenomenology Induced in the Propagation of UHECR, a Kinematical Solution in Finsler and Generalized Finsler Spacetime,

    M. D. C. Torri, “Quantum Gravity Phenomenology Induced in the Propagation of UHECR, a Kinematical Solution in Finsler and Generalized Finsler Spacetime,” Galaxies 9 (2021) no.4, 103 doi:10.3390/galaxies9040103 [arXiv:2110.09184 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Predictions of Ultra- High Energy Cosmic Ray Propagation in the Context of Homogeneously Modified Special Relativity,

    M. D. C. Torri, L. Caccianiga, A. di Matteo, A. Maino and L. Miramonti, “Predictions of Ultra- High Energy Cosmic Ray Propagation in the Context of Homogeneously Modified Special Relativity,” Symmetry 12 (2020) no.12, 1961 doi:10.3390/sym12121961 [arXiv:2110.09900 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Lorentz Invariance Vio- lation effects on UHECR propagation: A geometrized approach,

    M. D. C. Torri, S. Bertini, M. Giammarchi and L. Miramonti, “Lorentz Invariance Vio- lation effects on UHECR propagation: A geometrized approach,” JHEAp 18 (2018), 5-14 doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2018.01.001 [arXiv:1906.06948 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    White Paper and Roadmap for Quan- tum Gravity Phenomenology in the Multi-Messenger Era

    R. Alves Batista, G. Amelino-Camelia, D. Boncioli, J. M. Carmona, A. di Matteo, G. Gubitosi, I. Lobo, N. E. Mavromatos, C. Pfeifer and D. Rubiera-Garcia, et al. “White Paper and Roadmap for Quan- tum Gravity Phenomenology in the Multi-Messenger Era”, Class. Quantum Grav. 42 (2...

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    A group theoretic description of the κ-Poincar´ e Hopf algebra,

    M. Arzano and J. Kowalski-Glikman, “A group theoretic description of the κ-Poincar´ e Hopf algebra,” Phys. Lett. B 835 (2022), 137535 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137535 [arXiv:2204.09394 [hep-th]]

    2022

  10. [18]

    Bicrossproduct structure of kappa Poincare group and noncommutative ge- ometry,

    S. Majid and H. Ruegg, “Bicrossproduct structure of kappa Poincare group and noncommutative ge- ometry,” Phys. Lett. B 334 (1994), 348-354 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90699-8 [arXiv:hep-th/9405107 [hep-th]]

    1994 arXiv

  11. [19]

    New quantum Poincare algebra and k deformed field theory,

    J. Lukierski, A. Nowicki and H. Ruegg, “New quantum Poincare algebra and k deformed field theory,” Phys. Lett. B 293 (1992), 344-352 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90894-A

    1992 doi

  12. [20]

    Quantum kappa Poincare in any dimension,

    J. Lukierski and H. Ruegg, “Quantum kappa Poincare in any dimension,” Phys. Lett. B 329 (1994), 189-194 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90759-5 [arXiv:hep-th/9310117 [hep-th]]

    1994 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Hopf algebra description of noncommutative space-time symmetries,

    A. Agostini, G. Amelino-Camelia and F. D’Andrea, “Hopf algebra description of noncommutative space-time symmetries,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004), 5187-5220 doi:10.1142/S0217751X04020919 [arXiv:hep-th/0306013 [hep-th]]

    2004 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Relative Locality in κ-Poincar´ e,

    G. Gubitosi and F. Mercati, “Relative Locality in κ-Poincar´ e,” Class. Quant. Grav.30 (2013), 145002 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/14/145002 [arXiv:1106.5710 [gr-qc]]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Planck-Scale-Deformed Relativistic Symme- tries and Diffeomorphisms on Momentum Space,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, S. Bianco and G. Rosati, “Planck-Scale-Deformed Relativistic Symme- tries and Diffeomorphisms on Momentum Space,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.2, 026018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.026018 [arXiv:1910.01673 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    M. D. C. Torri and L. Miramonti, Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) no.15, 153001 doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/ad5825 [arXiv:2404.04076 [gr-qc]]. 21

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Deformed boost transformations that saturate at the Planck scale,

    N. R. Bruno, G. Amelino-Camelia and J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Deformed boost transformations that saturate at the Planck scale,” Phys. Lett. B 522 (2001), 133-138 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01264-3 [arXiv:hep-th/0107039 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Relativity in space-times with short distance structure governed by an observer independent (Planckian) length scale,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, “Relativity in space-times with short distance structure governed by an observer independent (Planckian) length scale,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11 (2002), 35-60 doi:10.1142/S0218271802001330 [arXiv:gr-qc/0012051 [gr-qc]]

    2002 arXiv

  19. [27]

    On the generality of the Cohen and Glashow constraints on the neutrino velocity,

    F. L. Villante and F. Vissani, “On the generality of the Cohen and Glashow constraints on the neutrino velocity,” [arXiv:1110.4591 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Non-Standard Neutrino Propagation and Pion Decay,

    M. Mannarelli, M. Mitra, F. L. Villante and F. Vissani, “Non-Standard Neutrino Propagation and Pion Decay,” JHEP 01 (2012), 136 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2012)136 [arXiv:1112.0169 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Cosmic rays and neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts,

    J. P. Rachen and P. Meszaros, “Cosmic rays and neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts,” AIP Conf. Proc. 428 (1998) no.1, 776-780 doi:10.1063/1.55402 [arXiv:astro-ph/9811266 [astro-ph]]

    1998 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Neutrinos from individual gamma-ray bursts in the BATSE catalog,

    D. Guetta, D. Hooper, J. Alvarez-Muniz, F. Halzen and E. Reuveni, “Neutrinos from individual gamma-ray bursts in the BATSE catalog,” Astropart. Phys. 20 (2004), 429-455 doi:10.1016/S0927- 6505(03)00211-1 [arXiv:astro-ph/0302524 [astro-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  23. [31]

    GRBs on probation: testing the UHECR paradigm with IceCube,

    M. Ahlers, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and F. Halzen, “GRBs on probation: testing the UHECR paradigm with IceCube,” Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011), 87-94 doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2011.05.008 [arXiv:1103.3421 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Search for Prompt Neutrino Emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts with IceCube,

    M. G. Aartsen et al. [IceCube], “Search for Prompt Neutrino Emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts with IceCube,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 805 (2015) no.1, L5 doi:10.1088/2041-8205/805/1/L5 [arXiv:1412.6510 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Chapter 9: Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts,

    S. S. Kimura, “Chapter 9: Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts,” doi:10.1142/9789811282645 0009 [arXiv:2202.06480 [astro-ph.HE]]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Neutrinos from the Bright- est Gamma-Ray Burst?,

    K. Murase, M. Mukhopadhyay, A. Kheirandish, S. S. Kimura and K. Fang, “Neutrinos from the Bright- est Gamma-Ray Burst?,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 941 (2022) no.1, L10 doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca3ae [arXiv:2210.15625 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    In-vacuo-dispersion features for GRB neutrinos and photons,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, G. D’Amico, G. Rosati and N. Loret, “In-vacuo-dispersion features for GRB neutrinos and photons,” Nature Astron. 1 (2017), 0139 doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0139 [arXiv:1612.02765 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Could quantum gravity slow down neutrinos?,

    G. Amelino-Camelia, M. G. Di Luca, G. Gubitosi, G. Rosati and G. D’Amico, “Could quantum gravity slow down neutrinos?,” Nature Astron. 7 (2023) no.8, 996-1001 doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01993- z [arXiv:2209.13726 [gr-qc]]. 22

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Limits on Neutrino Lorentz Violation from Multimessenger Observations of TXS 0506+056,

    J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, A. S. Sakharov and E. K. Sarkisyan-Grinbaum, “Limits on Neutrino Lorentz Violation from Multimessenger Observations of TXS 0506+056,” Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019), 352-355 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.11.062 [arXiv:1807.05155 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Amelino-Camelia, D

    G. Amelino-Camelia, D. Guetta, J. Piran, ”ICECUBE Neutrinos and Lorentz Invariance Violation,” Astrophys.J. 806 (2015) 2, 269 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/269

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    Neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts as a tool to explore quantum-gravity- induced Lorentz violation,

    U. Jacob and T. Piran, “Neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts as a tool to explore quantum-gravity- induced Lorentz violation,” Nature Phys. 3 (2007), 87-90 doi:10.1038/nphys506 [arXiv:hep-ph/0607145 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection,

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H. T. Janka, N. Saviano, K. Scholberg, R. Bollig, L. Hudepohl and S. Chakraborty, “Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39 (2016) no.1-2, 1-112 doi:10.1393/ncr/i2016-10120-8 [arXiv:1508.00785 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Neutrino-driven Explosions,

    H. T. Janka, “Neutrino-driven Explosions,” doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5 109 [arXiv:1702.08825 [astro-ph.HE]]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Neutrino Oscillations and Lorentz Invariance Violation,

    M. D. C. Torri, “Neutrino Oscillations and Lorentz Invariance Violation,” Universe 6 (2020) no.3, 37 doi:10.3390/universe6030037 [arXiv:2110.09186 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Neutrino oscillations and Lorentz Invariance Violation in a Finslerian Geometrical model,

    V. Antonelli, L. Miramonti and M. D. C. Torri, “Neutrino oscillations and Lorentz Invariance Violation in a Finslerian Geometrical model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.8, 667 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018- 6124-2 [arXiv:1803.08570 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Phenomenological Effects of CPT and Lorentz Invariance Violation in Particle and Astroparticle Physics,

    V. Antonelli, L. Miramonti and M. D. C. Torri, “Phenomenological Effects of CPT and Lorentz Invariance Violation in Particle and Astroparticle Physics,” Symmetry 12 (2020) no.11, 1821 doi:10.3390/sym12111821 [arXiv:2110.09185 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    L. M. Krauss and S. Tremaine ”Test of the weak equivalence principle for neutrinos and photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988 Jan 18;60(3):176-177 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.176 PMID: 10038467

    1988 doi

  38. [46]

    Gasperini ”Testing the principle of equivalence with neutrino oscillations” Phys

    M. Gasperini ”Testing the principle of equivalence with neutrino oscillations” Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988), 2635-2637 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2635

    1988 doi

  39. [47]

    R. B. Mann and U. Sarkar ”Test of the Equivalence Principle from Neutrino Oscillation Experiments” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996), 865-868 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.865

    1996 doi

  40. [48]

    Amelino-Camelia, Phys

    G. Amelino-Camelia, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012), 084034 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.084034 [arXiv:1110.5081 [hep-th]]. 23

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools