Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Revisiting the phonon theory of liquid heat capacity: low-frequency shear modes and intramolecular vibrations

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The most accurate model of liquid heat capacity treats low-frequency shear modes as overdamped, not as propagating Debye waves, and adds intramolecular vibrations.

desk verdict The liquid-like model is a good idea, but the main result rests on an incomplete thermodynamic derivative; the comparison needs to be redone before the claim is credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16187 v2 pith:62JTSZLU submitted 2025-01-27 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech

Yu Liu , Matteo Baggioli This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech
keywords liquidheatcapacityphonontheoryofliquidsoverdampedshearmodesdensitystatesFrenkelfrequencyintramolecularvibrationsk-gapdispersionDebyemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the standard phonon theory of liquid heat capacity rests on a wrong assumption: it treats low-frequency shear modes as propagating waves with a Debye density of states. The authors propose instead that these modes are overdamped and non-propagating, with a density of states linear in frequency, and they add the missing contribution from intramolecular vibrations. Comparing four theoretical models against experimental data for 21 to 23 liquids, they find that this liquid-like model agrees with data across the whole temperature range, reducing the typical error by a factor of two to three relative to the original phonon model. If right, this settles a basic question about what kinds of excitations carry heat in liquids and provides a parameter-free way to predict heat capacity for simple and molecular liquids alike.

What carries the argument

The central object is the liquid-like density of states for shear modes, $g_s(\omega) = A \omega^2 \sqrt{1 + 1/(4\tau^2\omega^2)}$, which interpolates between a Debye $\omega^2$ form at high frequency and a linear $\omega$ form below the Frenkel frequency $\omega_F = 1/\tau$. This DOS is inserted into the canonical phonon free energy $F_{ph} = E_0 + k_B T \sum_i \log(1 - e^{-\hbar\omega_i/k_B T})$ with a quasi-harmonic temperature shift, replacing the Debye DOS for the shear-mode terms in the total energy decomposition of Eq. (6). The second ingredient is the intramolecular vibrational heat capacity, $c^{vib}_v = R \sum_i (\Theta_{v,i}/T)^2 e^{\Theta_{v,i}/T}/(e^{\Theta_{v,i}/T}-1)^2$, which is added to the intermolecular (translational plus rotational) contribution to capture the rising heat capacity of molecular liquids.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to compute the heat capacity of a liquid from molecular dynamics by explicitly separating the energy of shear modes below the Frenkel frequency and checking whether their contribution follows the harmonic-oscillator expression with a linear DOS, or whether it obeys a different statistical mechanics; if the overdamped modes do not contribute to the free energy in the assumed harmonic form, the predicted $c_v$ would deviate systematically at temperatures where those modes dominate the count.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the heat capacity of liquids is best described by treating shear modes with frequency below the Frenkel frequency as overdamped liquid-like excitations with a density of states $g_s(\omega) \propto \omega$ at low frequency, rather than as Debye-like propagating phonons. The paper derives this density of states from the gapped (k-gap) dispersion relation of collective shear waves, Eq. (16), yielding Eq. (17), which reduces to a linear DOS below $\omega_F$. Using this DOS in the canonical phonon free energy, together with an explicit intramolecular vibrational contribution Eq. (19), the model reproduces experimental heat capacities for noble liquids, liquid metals, and molecular liquids, including non-monotonic temperature dependence in CO$_2$ and monotonically increasing $c_v$ in C$_5$H$_{12}$ that the original phonon model cannot capture. The paper shows that alternative treatments of the low-frequency modes as gas-like kinetic excitations or as completely absent produce significantly worse agreement, especially at high temperatures, and that the liquid-like model also outperforms existing approaches for liquid Ga when compared with the experimentally measured density of states.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that overdamped, non-propagating shear modes below the Frenkel frequency can still be described by the canonical phonon free energy, that is, as harmonic oscillators with real frequencies and a quasi-harmonic temperature shift; if the statistical mechanics of overdamped excitations differs fundamentally from harmonic phonons, the liquid-like model's advantage would be an artifact of using a better-fitting density of states in the wrong free-energy functional.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The liquid-like model provides a parameter-free prediction of liquid heat capacity that is more accurate than the original phonon model across the full temperature range, cutting typical percent error by roughly a factor of two to three.
  • The success of the model implies that low-frequency shear modes in liquids are not propagating Debye waves; they are overdamped, non-propagating excitations whose thermodynamic contribution should be counted with a linear-in-frequency density of states.
  • Adding intramolecular vibrations makes the theory capable of describing molecular liquids whose heat capacity increases with temperature, such as CO$_2$ and n-pentane, a behavior the original phonon model cannot reproduce.
  • Treating low-frequency shear modes as gas-like kinetic excitations leads to heat capacities below $2R$ at high temperatures, a value often used as a marker of the liquid-to-gas crossover, so the gas-like picture is physically inconsistent with liquid thermodynamics.
  • The model correctly captures the isotope effect between H$_2$O and D$_2$O at moderate temperatures, though it does not yet handle water's strong configurational contributions near its anomalous regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the linear low-frequency DOS is the correct thermodynamic counting for overdamped shear modes, the same density of states should also enter other liquid thermodynamic properties, such as entropy and free energy differences across the melting line, and could be tested in simulations that resolve mode contributions directly.
  • The model's success suggests that the distinction between propagating and overdamped excitations matters for thermodynamics, not just dynamics; one could extend the framework to supercritical fluids to see whether the liquid-like DOS also captures the heat capacity crossover near the Widom line.
  • The failure of the gas-like model at high temperature hints that any two-phase description of liquids that assigns a fixed gas-like fraction to low-frequency shear modes will systematically underestimate $c_v$; a temperature-dependent assignment based on the overdamped DOS might reconcile such approaches.
  • The water deviations may be reduced by adding a configurational term derived from the temperature derivative of the pair distribution function, which would be a direct test of whether the phonon framework can be extended to hydrogen-bonded networks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits the phonon theory of liquid heat capacity (Bolmatov, Brazhkin, and Trachenko) by questioning the standard treatment of low-frequency shear modes. It proposes a 'liquid-like' model in which modes below the Frenkel frequency are described by a linear-in-frequency density of states, Eq. (17), instead of a Debye DOS, and it adds intramolecular vibrational contributions, Eq. (19), for molecular liquids. The authors compare four models (original phonon, gas-like kinetic, zero, and liquid-like) against NIST REFPROP data for a set of liquids and against a neutron-scattering DOS benchmark for Ga. They report that the liquid-like model gives the best agreement, reducing the percentage error by a factor of 2-3 relative to the original phonon model, and that the gas-like and zero models fail at high temperature. The paper includes an extended comparison for 23 liquids and a discussion of water and heavy water.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supports the view that low-frequency shear modes in liquids are overdamped excitations with a linear DOS, and that a phonon-type free energy built on that DOS is thermodynamically viable. The model is parameter-free in the sense that no heat-capacity data are used as input: tau is obtained from NIST viscosity and G_infinity, alpha from prior literature, and vibrational frequencies from standard tables. The inclusion of intramolecular vibrations is a useful extension that lets the framework reproduce the non-monotonic and increasing cv(T) behavior of CO2 and C5H12. The Ga comparison against the experimentally measured DOS is a particularly clean test. However, the strength of the conclusion is currently limited by the incomplete thermodynamic treatment of the T-dependent DOS and by the small number of systems for which the liquid-like model is quantitatively compared with the other models.

major comments (5)
  1. [Overdamped liquid-like modes, Eqs. (9) and (17)] The liquid-like model evaluates Eq. (9), which is derived from Eqs. (7)-(8) under the quasi-harmonic assumption domega/dT = -alpha*omega/2 with a temperature-independent density of states g(omega), using the T-dependent shear DOS g_s(omega) = A(T) omega^2 sqrt(1 + 1/(4 tau(T)^2 omega^2)) from Eq. (17). Because tau(T) and the normalization A(T), fixed by the condition integral g_s domega = 2N, depend on T, the correct energy obtained from Eq. (7) contains the additional term -k_B T^2 integral log(1 - exp(-hbar*omega/k_B T)) (partial g_s/partial T) domega, plus boundary terms from the T-dependent split at omega_F in Eq. (6). This term is not computed or estimated. Since the reported 2-3x error reduction in Fig. 3 and Table I is the central claim, the authors must either include this contribution in cv or demonstrate that it is negligible; otherwise the liquid-like model's cv is not the thermodynamic derivative of the model it defines.
  2. [Theory section (after Eq. (1)) and Overdamped section (after Eq. (16))] The Frenkel frequency is defined inconsistently as omega_F = 2*pi/tau in the Theory section and as omega_F = 1/tau in the Overdamped section. The position of the split in Eq. (6) and the numerical value of the integrals over the shear DOS depend on omega_F, so the two conventions differ by a factor 2*pi and will produce different predictions. Please adopt a single convention, state the relation to the Maxwell relaxation time tau_M, and check the sensitivity of the reported errors to this choice.
  3. [Overdamped liquid-like modes, Eqs. (7)-(9)] The liquid-like model continues to compute the energy of the modes below omega_F from the canonical phonon free energy, Eq. (7), and the quasi-harmonic result, Eq. (9), which describe harmonic oscillators with real frequencies. This is the same class of assumption that the paper criticizes in the original model (Section 'Theory', paragraph after Eq. (6)), since modes below omega_F are described in the text as overdamped and non-oscillatory. The paper should justify why the harmonic-oscillator free energy is applicable to overdamped modes (or state the approximation explicitly) before concluding that the model is physically better motivated.
  4. [Appendix A and Fig. 3] The quantitative claim that the liquid-like model is the most accurate over the whole temperature range is established only for four liquids in Fig. 3 and for Ga in Table I. The extended analysis in Appendix A reports theoretical values for the liquid-like model only and does not compare its errors against the phonon, gas-like, and zero models for the 23 liquids. Please extend the model-by-model error comparison to the full data set, or qualify the universality claim accordingly.
  5. [Overdamped liquid-like modes, Eq. (17)] Eq. (17), the central ingredient of the liquid-like model, is imported from Refs. [28,35,36] without derivation. Since the model's improvement over the original phonon model depends entirely on this DOS, the paper should either reproduce the derivation or state clearly the assumptions leading to Eq. (17), including the meaning of tau in the overdamped regime and the explicit form of the normalization A(T).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The word 'straigthfroward' should be 'straightforward'.
  2. [Overdamped liquid-like modes] The name 'Brazkhin' should be 'Brazhkin' where Ref. [28] is mentioned.
  3. [Eq. (14) and surrounding text] The text says the last term in Eq. (6) coincides with Eq. (14), but Eq. (14) is labeled E_s(omega < omega_F), while the last term in Eq. (6) is E_s(omega < omega_F)/2; please clarify which quantity is being set to N(omega < omega_F) k_B T/2.
  4. [Comparison to experimental data and Appendix A] The comparison section states that data were collected for 21 liquids, while the text before Appendix A and the appendix itself refer to 23 liquids; please reconcile the counts.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] For the molecular liquids N2 and CH4, the caption says cv denotes the intermolecular part, but the procedure for subtracting rotational and intramolecular contributions from the NIST data is not described; please state the subtraction method or clarify what is plotted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the liquid-like model's predictions are not equivalent to fitted inputs or self-citation alone.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not exhibit any step in which a prediction is equivalent, by construction or by fitting, to its inputs. The liquid-like modification replaces the Debye shear DOS in Eq. (10) with the overdamped DOS in Eq. (17); the normalization constant A is fixed by the condition ∫_0^{ωD} g_s dω = 2N, not by any heat-capacity datum. All input parameters—Debye temperature, viscosity and G∞ for τ, α from [19], and vibrational frequencies from [42]—are taken from independent literature or databases, and none is fitted to the cv data being predicted. The claim that low-frequency shear modes have a linear DOS is imported from prior derivations [28,35,36] and experimental work [38,39]; although some of these references include the present author, the linear DOS is independently experimentally supported, so the citation is not the sole load-bearing evidence. The comparison against NIST data and the Ga benchmark in Table I uses external reference values, and the model's error reduction in Fig. 3 is a genuine out-of-sample comparison. The manuscript does contain caveats that are not circularity: Eq. (9) is derived under a quasi-harmonic assumption with an implicitly T-independent g(ω), while Eq. (17) has T dependence through τ(T), so the numerical cv computed from Eq. (13) may omit ∂g/∂T terms; and ωF is defined as 2π/τ in the Theory section but 1/τ in the Overdamped section. These are technical/correctness concerns, not reductions of the predicted cv to an input. Consequently, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The models use no parameters fitted to heat capacity data; inputs are external, such as Debye temperatures, viscosity, G∞, thermal expansion coefficient α, and vibrational frequencies. The main burden is the chain of domain assumptions about how overdamped modes contribute to the free energy.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Total liquid energy can be decomposed as E = El + Es(ω>ωF) + Es(ω<ωF)/2 via equipartition and negligible potential diffusion energy, Eq. (6).
    Section 'Theory', Eqs. (1)-(6); this decomposition underlies all four models, and the neglect of Pd is taken from Ref. [19].
  • domain assumption Overdamped shear modes below the Frenkel frequency have density of states gs(ω) = A ω^2 sqrt(1 + 1/(4τ^2ω^2)), linear in ω at low frequency, Eqs. (17)-(18).
    Section 'Overdamped liquid-like modes'; the formula is cited to Refs. [28,35,36] and depends on the k-gap dispersion, Eq. (16).
  • domain assumption Overdamped modes can be treated with the canonical phonon free energy, Eqs. (7)-(9), and the quasi-harmonic approximation dω/dT = -αω/2.
    The paper applies harmonic statistical mechanics to modes it describes as non-propagating and overdamped; no separate justification is given.
  • domain assumption The Frenkel frequency is set by the Maxwell relaxation time, ωF = 1/τ with τ = η/G∞, using experimental viscosity and a model for G∞ from Ref. [41].
    Section 'Comparison to experimental data', list of input parameters; the paper also uses the conflicting definition ωF = 2π/τ in the Theory section.
  • domain assumption Intramolecular vibrations contribute independently as Einstein oscillators, Eq. (19), with vibrational temperatures from Ref. [42].
    Section 'Intramolecular vibrations'; assumes decoupling from intermolecular modes and no temperature dependence of vibrational frequencies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting the phonon theory of liquid heat capacity: low-frequency shear modes and intramolecular vibrations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/62JTSZLU

@misc{pith2026250116187,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting the phonon theory of liquid heat capacity: low-frequency shear modes and intramolecular vibrations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/62JTSZLU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16187}
}
read the original abstract

Modeling the heat capacity of liquids present fundamental difficulties due to the strong intermolecular particle interactions and large diffusive-like displacements. Based on the experimental evidence that the microscopic dynamics of liquids closely resemble those of solids, a phonon theory of liquid thermodynamics has been developed. Despite its success, the phonon theory of liquids relies on the questionable assumption that low-frequency shear excitations are propagating in nature and follow a Debye density of states. Furthermore, the same framework does not capture the contribution of intramolecular vibrations, which play a significant role in molecular liquids. In this work, we revisit the phonon theory of liquid heat capacity, introducing alternative approaches to model low-frequency shear modes. In particular, we consider the recently proposed idea of treating such modes as pure kinetic and we propose a novel approach based on identifying those low-frequency excitations as overdamped liquid-like modes with linear in frequency density of states. Moreover, we complete the theory by incorporating the effects of intramolecular vibrations. By comparing the theoretical predictions from these different approaches with the available data for the heat capacity of several liquids, we present a comprehensive evaluation of the original model and the newly proposed extensions. Despite all approaches perform well at low-temperatures, our results indicate that modeling low-frequency modes as overdamped liquid-like excitations yields the most accurate agreement with the data in the whole temperature range. Conversely, we demonstrate that treating these excitations as purely gas-like leads to significant inaccuracies, particularly at high temperatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16187 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimental and calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Percentual error of the theoretical estimates based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Debye frequency ωD

    work page

  2. [2]

    This is assumed to coincide with the Maxwell relaxation time τM ≡ η/G∞

    The Frenkel frequency ωF or equivalently the re- laxation time τ . This is assumed to coincide with the Maxwell relaxation time τM ≡ η/G∞

    work page

  3. [3]

    The thermal expansion coefficient α

    work page

  4. [4]

    The Debye frequency is obtained from the Debye tem- perature of each system, Θ D = ℏωD/kBT

    The vibrational frequencies νi (for molecular liq- uids). The Debye frequency is obtained from the Debye tem- perature of each system, Θ D = ℏωD/kBT . In order to compute the Maxwell time, the viscosity is taken from the NIST database [4] and the infinite frequency shear 6 data phonon model zero model gas-like model liquid-like model Ar 200 250 300 350 40...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Sengers, R

    J. Sengers, R. Kayser, C. Peters, and H. White, Equa- tions of State for Fluids and Fluid Mixtures, Experimen- tal Thermodynamics (Elsevier Science, 2000)

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Ashcroft and N

    N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin, Solid State Physics, HR W international editions (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976)

    work page 1976

  7. [7]

    Kauzmann, Kinetic theory of gases(Courier Corpo- ration, 2012)

    W. Kauzmann, Kinetic theory of gases(Courier Corpo- ration, 2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Trachenko, Phys

    K. Trachenko, Phys. Rev. B 78, 104201 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Lemmon, M

    E. Lemmon, M. Huber, and M. McLinden, Nist standard reference database 23: Reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties-refprop, version 9.1 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    T. S. Ingebrigtsen, A. A. Veldhorst, T. B. Schroder, and J. C. Dyre, The Journal of Chemical Physics139, 171101 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Setzmann and W

    U. Setzmann and W. Wagner, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 20, 1061 (1991)

    1991

  4. [12]

    I. T. Todorov, W. Smith, K. Trachenko, and M. T. Dove, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 1911 (2006)

    2006

  5. [13]

    Raabe and E

    G. Raabe and E. J. Maginn, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 114, 10133 (2010), pMID: 20684636

    2010

  6. [14]

    Rosenfeld and P

    Y. Rosenfeld and P. Tarazona, Molecular Physics 95, 141 (1998)

    1998

  7. [15]

    Moon, Heat Carriers in Liquids: An Introduction (Springer)

    J. Moon, Heat Carriers in Liquids: An Introduction (Springer)

  8. [16]

    S. A. Khrapak and A. G. Khrapak, Physics of Fluids 36, 117119 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    S.-T. Lin, M. Blanco, and I. Goddard, William A., The Journal of Chemical Physics 119, 11792 (2003)

    2003

  10. [18]

    T. A. Pascal, S.-T. Lin, and W. A. Goddard III, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 169 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    (2) is significantly smaller than the other terms, rendering it negligible

    that Pd in Eq. (2) is significantly smaller than the other terms, rendering it negligible. Following that sim- plifying assumption, and combining the kinetic energy terms, the total energy can be expressed as below, E = K + Pl + Ps(ω > ωF ), (3) where K stands for the total ki...

  12. [20]

    J. Moon, L. Lindsay, and T. Egami, Phys. Rev. E 108, 014601 (2023). 10 CH4 CO T (K) cv/R (exp) cv/R (th) T (K) cv/R (exp) cv/R (th) 120 2.62 2.59 95 2.88 2.84 140 2.47 2.46 105 2.72 2.70 160 2.35 2.34 115 2.59 2.58 F2 H2S T (K) cv/R (exp) cv/R (th) T (K) cv/R (exp) cv/R (th) 6...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Baggioli and A

    M. Baggioli and A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. E 104, 014103 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Trachenko, Theory of Liquids: From Excitations to Thermodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    K. Trachenko, Theory of Liquids: From Excitations to Thermodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Bolmatov and K

    D. Bolmatov and K. Trachenko, Phys. Rev. B 84, 054106 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Bolmatov, V

    D. Bolmatov, V. V. Brazhkin, and K. Trachenko, Scien- tific Reports 2, 421 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    C. Yang, M. T. Dove, V. V. Brazhkin, and K. Trachenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 215502 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Nosenko, J

    V. Nosenko, J. Goree, and A. Piel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 115001 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Jiang, Z

    C. Jiang, Z. Zheng, Y. Chen, M. Baggioli, and J. Zhang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08285 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Trachenko and V

    K. Trachenko and V. V. Brazhkin, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 016502 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Baggioli, M

    M. Baggioli, M. Vasin, V. Brazhkin, and K. Trachenko, Physics Reports 865, 1 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    J. E. Proctor, Physics of Fluids 32, 107105 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Bolmatov, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 7121 (2022), pMID: 35950307

    D. Bolmatov, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 7121 (2022), pMID: 35950307

    2022

  24. [32]

    Chen, Journal of Heat Transfer 144, 010801 (2022)

    G. Chen, Journal of Heat Transfer 144, 010801 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Brazhkin, Density of states in liquids: quadratic or linear, and what each means? (2024)

    V. Brazhkin, Density of states in liquids: quadratic or linear, and what each means? (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    W. A. Phillips, U. Buchenau, N. N¨ ucker, A.-J. Dianoux, and W. Petry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2381 (1989)

    1989

  27. [35]

    Dawidowski, F

    J. Dawidowski, F. Bermejo, C. Cabrillo, and S. Benning- ton, Chemical Physics 258, 247 (2000)

    2000

  28. [38]

    J. Ding, M. K. Gupta, C. Rosenbach, H.-M. Lin, N. C. Osti, D. L. Abernathy, W. G. Zeier, and O. Delaire, Na- ture Physics 10.1038/s41567-024-02707-6 (2025)

    2025 doi

  29. [39]

    Zaccone and M

    A. Zaccone and M. Baggioli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2022303118 (2021)

    2021

  30. [40]

    Trachenko, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 112601 (2023)

    K. Trachenko, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 112601 (2023)

    2023

  31. [41]

    Y. Yu, S. Jin, X. Fan, M. Sarter, D. Yu, M. Baggioli, and L. Hong, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11429 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  32. [42]

    Frenkel, Kinetic theory of liquids, International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press Oxford, Ox- ford, 1946)

    J. Frenkel, Kinetic theory of liquids, International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press Oxford, Ox- ford, 1946)

    1946

  33. [43]

    Stamper, D

    C. Stamper, D. Cortie, Z. Yue, X. Wang, and D. Yu, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 3105 (2022)

    2022

  34. [44]

    S. Jin, X. Fan, C. Stamper, R. A. Mole, Y. Yu, L. Hong, D. Yu, and M. Baggioli, Scientific Reports 14, 18805 (2024)

    2024

  35. [45]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics: Vol- ume 5, Vol. 5 (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  36. [46]

    Keshavarzi, M

    E. Keshavarzi, M. Vahedpour, S. Alavi, and B. Najafi, International Journal of Thermophysics 25, 1747 (2004)

    2004

  37. [47]

    Wark and D

    K. Wark and D. Richards, Thermodynamics, McGraw- Hill series in mechanical engineering (WCB/McGraw- Hill, 1999)

    1999

  38. [48]

    V. Y. Prokhorenko, V. V. Roshchupkin, M. A. Pokrasin, S. V. Prokhorenko, and V. V. Kotov, High Temperature 38, 954 (2000)

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.