Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Effect of a polymeric compound layer on jetting dynamics produced by bursting bubbles

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bursting bubbles coated with a polymer layer produce jets whose speed and drop ejection are governed by two competing controls: coating thickness and polymer strength.

desk verdict New experimental data on compound bubble bursting with solid main trends, but the regime map rests on an unmeasured relaxation time that needs direct rheometry or a strong caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16540 v1 pith:PQBMH5X3 submitted 2025-01-27 physics.flu-dyn

Sainath A. Barbhai , Zhengyu Yang , Jie Feng This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords bubbleburstingWorthingtonjetviscoelasticcoatingdropscapillarywavedampingDeborahnumberpolyethyleneoxideaerosolization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper experimentally establishes that a thin viscoelastic polymer layer coating a bursting bubble controls the Worthington jet and the drops it throws. At a fixed polymer concentration, increasing the coating volume fraction $\psi_0$ makes the jet faster and narrower and produces smaller, more numerous jet drops. At a fixed $\psi_0$, increasing polymer concentration makes the jet slower and wider and reduces the number of drops, until drop ejection stops entirely near $De \approx 10^{-2}$. The authors attribute the first trend to stronger capillary-wave damping and a smaller cavity cone angle, and the second to growing viscoelastic stresses. The result matters because ocean bubbles are often coated with extracellular polymeric substances, so it links bubble bursting to how biological material enters the atmosphere.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the compound bubble—an air core coated by a polyethylene oxide solution (a weakly viscoelastic, nearly constant-viscosity Boger fluid) sitting in a Newtonian bulk—and two dimensionless controls: the coating volume fraction $\psi_0$ and the Deborah number $De = \lambda_r/t_c$, where $\lambda_r$ is the apparent extensional relaxation time and $t_c = \sqrt{\rho_b R_0^3/\gamma_e}$ is the inertio-capillary time. During cavity collapse, capillary waves run along the air-coating and coating-bulk interfaces; the wave separation shortens the characteristic wavelength $L$, increasing damping, while the converging waves form a cavity cone of semi-angle $\beta$ that sets the jet's speed and radius. The viscoelastic stresses, scaled by $De$ and the elastocapillary number $Ec$, resist the extensional stretching of the jet, slowing and widening it. The combination of these two mechanisms explains the measured jet velocity and radius trends and sets the drop/no-drop boundary at $De \approx 10^{-2}$.

What would settle it

Directly measure the extensional relaxation time of the 0.01–0.2 wt% PEO solutions (for example by capillary breakup rheometry), recompute the Deborah number for each case, and check whether all no-jet-drop cases fall above $De \approx 10^{-2}$ and all jet-drop cases below it; testing a second polymer with the same relaxation time but different chemistry would show whether the boundary is universal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a bubble coated with a weakly viscoelastic polymer layer has two separable controls on its bursting jet. Increasing the coating volume fraction $\psi_0$ at fixed polymer concentration enhances jetting: the dimensionless jet velocity $v_j/v_{ce}$ rises and the dimensionless jet radius $r_j/R_0$ falls, leveling off near $\psi_0 \gtrsim 30\%$, because the thicker layer separates capillary waves onto the air-coating and coating-bulk interfaces, shortens the capillary wavelength, damps short-wavelength disturbances, and forms a smaller cavity cone angle $2\beta$ during collapse. Increasing polymer concentration at fixed $\psi_0$ suppresses jetting: viscoelastic stresses stretch and thicken the jet, making it slower and wider, reducing drop number, and at $c = 0.2$ wt% (where $De \approx 2.7 \times 10^{-2}$) suppressing jet drops entirely. The paper reports, for the first time, a regime map in the $(De,\psi_0)$ plane with a jet-drop/no-jet-drop boundary near $De \approx 10^{-2}$, with $\psi_0$ having negligible influence on that transition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the relaxation time of the polymer solution, which sets the Deborah number $De$ used to draw the drop/no-drop boundary, is accurately given by a published power-law fit rather than measured for these exact solutions; if that fit does not transfer, the $De$ values and the $De \approx 10^{-2}$ boundary would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thicker polymeric coatings on a bubble of fixed composition produce faster, thinner jets and smaller, more numerous jet drops, so coating thickness alone can amplify the aerosol emission of the coating material.
  • Stronger polymer solutions produce slower, thicker jets with fewer drops, and above $De \approx 10^{-2}$ no jet drops are ejected at all.
  • The cavity collapse time is unchanged across all tested concentrations and coating fractions, so the coating alters jet formation without changing the collapse timing.
  • Because the drop/no-drop boundary is set by $De$ rather than $\psi_0$, the polymer relaxation time, not the coating thickness, determines whether coated bubbles release drops into the air.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is that the thickness-driven enhancement is a geometric and capillary effect that should occur for any immiscible low-surface-tension coating, while the suppression branch depends specifically on the polymer relaxation time.
  • The $De \approx 10^{-2}$ boundary is only as robust as the published power-law relaxation-time correlation used to compute $De$; direct measurement of $\lambda_r$ for these solutions could move the boundary.
  • In marine settings, bubbles coated by extracellular polymeric substances could fall on either side of the boundary depending on local polymer concentration, implying that biological aerosol fluxes may respond non-monotonically to polymer loading.
  • A testable extension is to measure the full drop-size distribution including satellite drops: the bead-on-a-string dynamics imply the clearest signature of increasing $De$ should appear in satellite counts and filament lifetimes rather than only in the top-drop radius.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports an experimental study of Worthington jet formation from bursting compound bubbles, in which a bubble of radius R0 ≈ 1.48 mm is coated with a layer of aqueous PEO solution and rises through hexadecane. The authors use synchronized high-speed imaging to measure the cavity collapse time, capillary-wave wavelength, cavity cone angle, jet velocity and radius, top-drop velocity and radius, and the number of jet drops as functions of the compound-layer volume fraction ψ0 (0–60%) and PEO concentration c (0.01–0.2 wt%). They report that at fixed c, increasing ψ0 produces faster, thinner jets and smaller, more numerous drops; at fixed ψ0, increasing c produces slower, broader jets and eventually suppresses drop ejection at c = 0.2 wt%. The concentration effect is interpreted through the Deborah number De = λr/tc and the elastocapillary number Ec, and a De–ψ0 regime map is presented with a jet-drop/no-jet-drop boundary near De ≈ 10^-2. The apparent extensional relaxation time λr is taken from the literature correlation of Rodríguez-Díaz et al. rather than measured for the specific PEO used here.

Significance. If the results hold, this is the first systematic experimental characterization of bubble-bursting jets for compound bubbles with a viscoelastic layer, a configuration directly relevant to marine aerosol generation by EPS-coated bubbles. The qualitative trends in jet velocity, jet radius, and drop number versus ψ0 and c are directly supported by the imaging data and appear internally consistent, and the paper reports the uncertainty in the cavity collapse time. The main risk is that the dimensionless interpretation and the De ≈ 10^-2 boundary rely on an apparent extensional relaxation time taken from a literature correlation rather than measured for the present PEO solution; this does not threaten the direct empirical trends but does affect the claimed mechanism and the regime map. The statistical reporting is also incomplete: the compound-bubble data in Figs. 7–9 lack error bars and replicate counts.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 (Materials) and Fig. 10] The De–ψ0 regime map and the conclusion that drop ejection is suppressed by viscoelastic stresses depend on De = λr/tc, where λr is not measured in this work but is taken from the semi-empirical fit λr = 2.707 × 10^-7 c^1.733 ms of Rodríguez-Díaz et al. (refs. 26 and 49). The manuscript does not establish that this correlation transfers to the Sigma-Aldrich PEO of MW 6 × 10^5 g/mol used here, and relaxation times of dilute PEO solutions are strongly molecular-weight dependent. If the true λr at c = 0.2 wt% were an order of magnitude smaller, the no-jet-drop cases would fall below De ≈ 10^-2 and the claimed boundary would not be a material transition. The direct measurements of vj, rj, vd, rd, and Nd are not at risk, but the dimensionless boundary and the elastic-stress mechanism are. Please add direct extensional rheometry on these exact solutions, or at minimum a quantitative sensitivity analysis (e.g., propagating an order-of-magnitude uncertainty in λr through Fig. 10 and stating whether the boundary remains identifiable).
  2. [Figs. 7–9 and Section 3] The manuscript does not report replicate counts or error bars for the compound-bubble data points in Figs. 7, 8, and 9; error bars appear only for the bare-bubble baseline in Fig. 7. As a result, the reader cannot assess whether the reported trends (for example, the increase of vj with ψ0 or the decrease of Nd with c) are statistically significant, nor whether the differences among PEO concentrations exceed experimental scatter. Please state the number of repeated runs per condition, report standard deviations or confidence intervals for all data points, and where possible give a statistical test or at least a clear statement of the measurement uncertainty for each plotted quantity.
  3. [Section 3 (Jetting dynamics) and Table 3] The text states that Oht remains 'relatively constant' as the polymer concentration increases, but Table 3 lists Oht values from 3.72 × 10^-3 (0.01 wt%) to 6.12 × 10^-3 (0.2 wt%), a 64% increase. Because the total Ohnesorge number changes substantially across the concentration range, the attribution of the slower and broader jets at higher c solely to increasing viscoelastic stresses is not fully separated from a possible Newtonian viscous effect. This point is subordinate to the unmeasured λr issue, but it should be addressed, for example by comparing with a Newtonian fluid of matched Oht or by quantifying the expected effect of the Oht variation on jet velocity and radius.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1 and Section 4] There are duplicated verbatim paragraphs: the introductory paragraph beginning 'Here, we experimentally investigate the bursting dynamics...' appears twice, and the concluding paragraph beginning 'We believe that our findings advance the understanding...' also appears twice. Please remove the duplicates.
  2. [Section 3 (Cavity collapse)] The sentence 'While PEO molecules are excepted to adsorb onto the interface' contains a typo; it should read 'expected to adsorb'.
  3. [References 26 and 49] Reference 26 and reference 49 contain LaTeX escape sequences such as 'Rodr \'iguez-D \'iaz', 'Ga\~n\'an-Calvo', and 'Cabezas' that are not rendered; these should be cleaned up to proper UTF-8 names.
  4. [Fig. 10] The right panel of the regime map projects the current experiments onto the Bo–Oht space of Walls et al. (ref. 57); please clarify in the caption or text how Oht is computed for the compound bubbles and why the no-jet-drop cases nevertheless fall within the Newtonian jet-drop region with respect to the Bo–Oht criterion.
  5. [Section 2 (Experimental setup)] The definition of ψ0 = 3V0/(4πR0^3) states that V0 is obtained by image analysis right before jet formation, but it is not clear whether this volume is the initial coating volume or the volume at the moment of measurement; please clarify when and how V0 is evaluated, and whether the reported ψ0 values refer to the initial or instantaneous compound-layer fraction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: direct measurements drive the empirical trends; the De boundary is an empirical mapping using an external relaxation-time correlation, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain. The central trends (jet velocity, jet radius, drop velocity, drop radius, and drop count versus compound-layer fraction and polymer concentration) are direct high-speed-imaging measurements, with no parameter fitted to the jet/drop outcomes. The De–psi0 regime map is an empirical boundary: De = lambda_r/t_c uses the external Rodriguez-Diaz et al. correlation for lambda_r and measured R0 and interfacial tensions, so De is essentially a monotone rescaling of polymer concentration, not a quantity inferred from the jet-drop result. The concern that this correlation may not transfer to the 6x10^5 g/mol PEO used here is a correctness/robustness issue, not circularity: if lambda_r were revised, the measured trends and the observed absence of drops at c = 0.2 wt% would remain, and only the numerical location of the dimensionless boundary would shift. Self-citations (refs 33, 34, 45) provide interpretive mechanisms and measurement conventions, such as capillary-wave separation and wavelength measurement, but the load-bearing observations are new, and no uniqueness theorem or prior author-derived ansatz is used to force the conclusions. No equation is equivalent to its input by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes new measurements, but its dimensionless interpretation leans on a published relaxation-time correlation (not measured here), a Boger-fluid assumption for the PEO layer, and standard surface-tension additivity. There are no invented entities; the claimed regime boundary is an empirical fit to the authors' own data, not a derived law.

free parameters (1)
  • Relaxation-time correlation prefactor and exponent = lambda_r = 2.707e-7 c^1.733 ms (c in ppm)
    The apparent extensional relaxation time lambda_r is taken from a semi-empirical fit by Rodriguez-Diaz et al. (ref 26) rather than measured for the PEO (MW 6x10^5 g/mol) used here. All De and Ec values and the De-psi0 regime map inherit the correlation's uncertainty.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The PEO solutions in the tested concentration range behave as Boger fluids (no shear thinning) and remain below the overlap concentration of 2.44 wt%.
    Stated in Section 2 (Materials) and supported by shear rheology measurements shown in Fig 2, but the extensional behavior is inferred only through the published correlation.
  • domain assumption The apparent extensional relaxation time correlation from ref 26 applies to the present PEO molecular weight and concentration range.
    Used to compute De and Ec; no in-situ measurement of lambda_r is performed. If the correlation is off, the regime map boundary shifts.
  • standard math The effective surface tension gamma_e = gamma_ac + gamma_cb governs capillary velocity and the inertio-capillary timescale t_c.
    Standard definition used in refs 27,28; used throughout the nondimensionalization in Section 2.
  • domain assumption Gravity effects are negligible at Bo~0.19.
    Stated in Section 2; supports the use of inertio-capillary scaling and the comparison with the Walls et al. regime map.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of a polymeric compound layer on jetting dynamics produced by bursting bubbles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PQBMH5X3

@misc{pith2026250116540,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of a polymeric compound layer on jetting dynamics produced by bursting bubbles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PQBMH5X3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16540}
}
read the original abstract

Jetting dynamics from bursting bubbles play a key role in mediating mass and momentum transport across the air-liquid interface. In marine environments, this phenomenon has drawn considerable attention due to its role in releasing biochemical contaminants, such as extracellular polymeric substances, into the atmosphere through aerosol production. These biocontaminants often exhibit non-Newtonian characteristics, yet the physics of bubble bursting with a rheologically complex layer at bubble-liquid interfaces remains largely unexplored. In this study, we experimentally investigate the jetting dynamics of bubble bursting events in the presence of such polymeric compound layers. Using bubbles coated by a polyethylene oxide solution, we document the cavity collapse and jetting dynamics produced by bubble bursting. At a fixed polymer concentration, the jet velocity increases while the jet radius decreases with an increasing compound layer fraction, as a result of stronger capillary wave damping due to capillary wave separation at the compound interface as well as the formation of smaller cavity cone angles during bubble cavity collapse. These dynamics produce smaller and more numerous jet drops. Meanwhile, as the polymer concentration increases, the jet velocity decreases while the jet radius increases for the same compound layer fraction due to the increasing viscoelastic stresses. In addition, fewer jet drops are ejected as the jets become slower and broader with increasing polymer concentration, as viscoelastic stresses persist throughout the jet formation and thinning process. We further obtain a regime map delineating the conditions for jet drop ejection versus no jet drop ejection in bursting bubbles coated with a polymeric compound layer. Our results may provide new insights into the mechanisms of mass transport of organic materials in bubble-mediated aerosolization processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16540 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Experimental setup for high-speed imaging for the jetting dynamics of bubbles with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Shear stress σ as a function of the shear rate ˙γ for PEO solutions of different concentra￾tions. Materials. We used aqueous solutions of polyethylene oxide (PEO) (Sigma-Aldrich, molecular weight of 6 × 105 g/mol) as the viscoelastic compound layer. The solutions were prepared by dissolving the polymers in deionized water (Smart2Pure 3 UV/UF, ThermoFisher Scientific, 18.2 MΩ · cm at 20◦C) on a magnetic stirrer for 2… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. High-speed imaging of bubble cavity collapse: (a) bare bubble in hexadecane, (b) com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cavity collapse time tcc as a function of ψ0 for bursting bubbles coated by PEO solutions with concentrations of 0.01 - 0.2 wt%. The collapse time across all cases remains nearly constant, with a value of 1.88 ± 0.11 ms. tions, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Side view of a bursting bubble coated by a compound layer at a PEO concentration of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Side view of a bursting bubble coated by a compound layer at a PEO concentration (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Non-dimensionalized jet (a) velocity and (b) radius as functions of compound layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Non-dimensionalized top jet drop (a) velocity and (b) radius as a function of compound [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Number of jet drops, Nd, as a function of compound layer volume fractions with different PEO concentrations of 0.01 - 0.2 wt%. The inset illustrates an example featuring three jet drops. Regime map for bubble bursting jet drops Based on the above results, we demonstrat…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Regime maps depicting jet-drop and no-jet-drop transitions for jets from bursting bub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mass transfer at the ocean--atmosphere interface: the role of wave breaking, droplets, and bubbles

    Deike, L. Mass transfer at the ocean--atmosphere interface: the role of wave breaking, droplets, and bubbles. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2022, 54, 191--224

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    T.; Takehara, K.; Nguyen, H.; Etoh, T

    Thoroddsen, S. T.; Takehara, K.; Nguyen, H.; Etoh, T. Singular jets during the collapse of drop-impact craters. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2018, 848, R3

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    C.; MacDonald, I

    Johansen, C.; Todd, A. C.; MacDonald, I. R. Time series video analysis of bubble release processes at natural hydrocarbon seeps in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Petroleum Geology 2017, 82, 21--34

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 2020, 545, 116411

    Johansen, C.; Macelloni, L.; Natter, M.; Silva, M.; Woosley, M.; Woolsey, A.; Diercks, A.; Hill, J.; Viso, R.; Marty, E.; others Hydrocarbon migration pathway and methane budget for a Gulf of Mexico natural seep site: Green Canyon 600. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 2020, 545, 116411

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    D.; Kavanagh, J

    McClure, D. D.; Kavanagh, J. M.; Fletcher, D. F.; Barton, G. W. Characterizing bubble column bioreactor performance using computational fluid dynamics. Chemical Engineering Science 2016, 144, 58--74

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    M.; Maraqa, M

    Sakr, M.; Mohamed, M. M.; Maraqa, M. A.; Hamouda, M. A.; Hassan, A. A.; Ali, J.; Jung, J. A critical review of the recent developments in micro--nano bubbles applications for domestic and industrial wastewater treatment. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2022, 61, 6591--6612

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    K.; Zaleski, S.; Popinet, S.; S \'e on, T

    Deike, L.; Ghabache, E.; Liger-Belair, G.; Das, A. K.; Zaleski, S.; Popinet, S.; S \'e on, T. Dynamics of jets produced by bursting bubbles. Physical Review Fluids 2018, 3, 013603

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    R.; Schwartz, S

    Lewis, E. R.; Schwartz, S. E. Sea salt aerosol production: mechanisms, methods, measurements, and models; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, 2004; Vol. 152

    work page 2004

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2006, 6, 1777--1813

    Textor, C.; Schulz, M.; Guibert, S.; Kinne, S.; Balkanski, Y.; Bauer, S.; Berntsen, T.; Berglen, T.; Boucher, O.; Chin, M.; others Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2006, 6, 1777--1813

    2006

  2. [10]

    Ocean spray

    Veron, F. Ocean spray. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2015, 47, 507--538

    2015

  3. [11]

    E.; Cooke, M

    Olson, N. E.; Cooke, M. E.; Shi, J. H.; Birbeck, J. A.; Westrick, J. A.; Ault, A. P. Harmful algal bloom toxins in aerosol generated from inland lake water. Environmental science & technology 2020, 54, 4769--4780

    2020

  4. [12]

    B.; Li, Q.; Nunes, J

    Shaw, D. B.; Li, Q.; Nunes, J. K.; Deike, L. Ocean emission of microplastic. PNAS nexus 2023, 2, pgad296

    2023

  5. [13]

    Biosurfactants change the thinning of contaminated bubbles at bacteria-laden water interfaces

    Poulain, S.; Bourouiba, L. Biosurfactants change the thinning of contaminated bubbles at bacteria-laden water interfaces. Physical Review Letters 2018, 121, 204502

    2018

  6. [14]

    Blanchard, D. C. The ejection of drops from the sea and their enrichment with bacteria and other materials: a review. Estuaries 1989, 12, 127--137

    1989

  7. [15]

    R.; Bird, J

    McRae, O.; Mead, K. R.; Bird, J. C. Aerosol agitation: Quantifying the hydrodynamic stressors on particulates encapsulated in small droplets. Physical Review Fluids 2021, 6, L031601

    2021

  8. [16]

    W.; Ladino, L

    Wilson, T. W.; Ladino, L. A.; Alpert, P. A.; Breckels, M. N.; Brooks, I. M.; Browse, J.; Burrows, S. M.; Carslaw, K. S.; Huffman, J. A.; Judd, C.; others A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles. Nature 2015, 525, 234--238

    2015

  9. [17]

    Role of contamination in optimal droplet production by collective bubble bursting

    N \'e el, B.; Erinin, M.; Deike, L. Role of contamination in optimal droplet production by collective bubble bursting. Geophysical Research Letters 2022, 49, e2021GL096740

    2022

  10. [18]

    The fluid dynamics of disease transmission

    Bourouiba, L. The fluid dynamics of disease transmission. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2021, 53, 473--508

    2021

  11. [19]

    Fluid dynamics of respiratory infectious diseases

    Bourouiba, L. Fluid dynamics of respiratory infectious diseases. Annual review of biomedical engineering 2021, 23, 547--577

    2021

  12. [20]

    D.; Di Maio, E.; Fuller, G

    Tammaro, D.; Chandran Suja, V.; Kannan, A.; Gala, L. D.; Di Maio, E.; Fuller, G. G.; Maffettone, P. L. Flowering in bursting bubbles with viscoelastic interfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2021, 118, e2105058118

    2021

  13. [21]

    Biomaterials 2020, 255, 120157

    Chen, K.-H.; Miao, Y.-B.; Shang, C.-Y.; Huang, T.-Y.; Yu, Y.-T.; Yeh, C.-N.; Song, H.-L.; Chen, C.-T.; Mi, F.-L.; Lin, K.-J.; others A bubble bursting-mediated oral drug delivery system that enables concurrent delivery of lipophilic and hydrophilic chemotherapeutics for treati...

    2020

  14. [22]

    The fluid mechanics of bubbly drinks

    Zenit, R.; Rodr \' guez-Rodr \' guez, J. The fluid mechanics of bubbly drinks. Physics today 2018, 71, 44--50

    2018

  15. [23]

    An overview of oil--water separation using gas flotation systems

    Saththasivam, J.; Loganathan, K.; Sarp, S. An overview of oil--water separation using gas flotation systems. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 671--680

    2016

  16. [24]

    Rising bubbles enhance the gelatinous nature of the air--sea interface

    Robinson, T.-B.; Wurl, O.; Bahlmann, E.; J \"u rgens, K.; Stolle, C. Rising bubbles enhance the gelatinous nature of the air--sea interface. Limnology and Oceanography 2019, 64, 2358--2372

    2019

  17. [25]

    Bursting bubble in a viscoplastic medium

    Sanjay, V.; Lohse, D.; Jalaal, M. Bursting bubble in a viscoplastic medium. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2021, 922, A2

    2021

  18. [26]

    Bubble bursting in a weakly viscoelastic liquid

    Rodr \' guez-D \' az, P.; Rubio, A.; Montanero, J.; Ga \ n \'a n-Calvo, A.; Cabezas, M. Bubble bursting in a weakly viscoelastic liquid. Physics of Fluids 2023, 35, 102107

    2023

  19. [27]

    Effect of the polymer viscosity and relaxation time on the Worthington jet produced by bubble bursting in weakly viscoelastic liquids

    Cabalgante-Corrales, E.; Mu \ n oz-S \'a nchez, B.; L \'o pez-Herrera, J.; Cabezas, M.; Vega, E.; Montanero, J. Effect of the polymer viscosity and relaxation time on the Worthington jet produced by bubble bursting in weakly viscoelastic liquids. International Journal of Multi...

    2024

  20. [28]

    K.; Oratis, A.; Zinelis, K.; Lohse, D.; Sanjay, V

    Dixit, A. K.; Oratis, A.; Zinelis, K.; Lohse, D.; Sanjay, V. Viscoelastic Worthington jets & droplets produced by bursting bubbles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05089 2024,

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    G.; Sanjay, V.; Jalaal, M.; Vinuesa, R.; Tammisola, O

    Balasubramanian, A. G.; Sanjay, V.; Jalaal, M.; Vinuesa, R.; Tammisola, O. Bursting bubble in an elasto-viscoplastic medium. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14897 2024,

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A new constitutive equation for elastoviscoplastic fluid flows

    Saramito, P. A new constitutive equation for elastoviscoplastic fluid flows. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 2007, 145, 1--14

    2007

  23. [31]

    Water-to-air transfer of nano/microsized particulates: enrichment effect in bubble bursting jet drops

    Ji, B.; Singh, A.; Feng, J. Water-to-air transfer of nano/microsized particulates: enrichment effect in bubble bursting jet drops. Nano letters 2022, 22, 5626--5634

    2022

  24. [32]

    R.; Kahouadji, L.; Batchvarov, A.; Shin, S.; Chergui, J.; Juric, D.; Matar, O

    Constante-Amores, C. R.; Kahouadji, L.; Batchvarov, A.; Shin, S.; Chergui, J.; Juric, D.; Matar, O. K. Dynamics of a surfactant-laden bubble bursting through an interface. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2021, 911, A57

    2021

  25. [33]

    Effect of surface viscoelasticity on top jet drops produced by bursting bubbles

    Yang, Z.; Barbhai, S.; Ji, B.; Feng, J. Effect of surface viscoelasticity on top jet drops produced by bursting bubbles. Soft Matter 2024,

    2024

  26. [34]

    H.; Feng, J

    Ji, B.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ewoldt, R. H.; Feng, J. Secondary bubble entrainment via primary bubble bursting at a viscoelastic surface. Physical Review Letters 2023, 131, 104002

    2023

  27. [35]

    W.; Gutierrez, T

    Decho, A. W.; Gutierrez, T. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in ocean systems. Frontiers in Microbiology 2017, 8, 922

    2017

  28. [36]

    Influence of surfactant concentration on drop production by bubble bursting

    Pierre, J.; Poujol, M.; S \'e on, T. Influence of surfactant concentration on drop production by bubble bursting. Physical Review Fluids 2022, 7, 073602

    2022

  29. [37]

    Pico, P.; Kahouadji, L.; Shin, S.; Chergui, J.; Juric, D.; Matar, O. K. Surfactant-laden bubble bursting: Dynamics of capillary waves and Worthington jet at large Bond number. Physical Review Fluids 2024, 9, 083606

    2024

  30. [38]

    M.; Krzto \'n -Maziopa, A

    Mrokowska, M. M.; Krzto \'n -Maziopa, A. Viscoelastic and shear-thinning effects of aqueous exopolymer solution on disk and sphere settling. Scientific Reports 2019, 9, 7897

    2019

  31. [39]

    Bigg, E. K. Sources, nature and influence on climate of marine airborne particles. Environmental Chemistry 2007, 4, 155--161

    2007

  32. [40]

    K.; Leck, C

    Bigg, E. K.; Leck, C. The composition of fragments of bubbles bursting at the ocean surface. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2008, 113

    2008

  33. [41]

    Comparison of sources and nature of the tropical aerosol with the summer high Arctic aerosol

    Leck, C.; Keith Bigg, E. Comparison of sources and nature of the tropical aerosol with the summer high Arctic aerosol. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 2008, 60, 118--126

    2008

  34. [42]

    Characterization of the proteinaceous matter in marine aerosols

    Kuznetsova, M.; Lee, C.; Aller, J. Characterization of the proteinaceous matter in marine aerosols. Marine Chemistry 2005, 96, 359--377

    2005

  35. [43]

    Oil-coated bubble formation from submerged coaxial orifices

    Ji, B.; Yang, Z.; Feng, J. Oil-coated bubble formation from submerged coaxial orifices. Physical Review Fluids 2021, 6, 033602

    2021

  36. [44]

    Oil column pinch-off controls the oil fraction of the oil-coated bubble

    Ji, B.; Singh, A.; Feng, J. Oil column pinch-off controls the oil fraction of the oil-coated bubble. Physics of Fluids 2021, 33, 103316

    2021

  37. [45]

    T.; Feng, J

    Yang, Z.; Ji, B.; Ault, J. T.; Feng, J. Enhanced singular jet formation in oil-coated bubble bursting. Nature Physics 2023, 19, 884--890

    2023

  38. [46]

    James, D. F. Boger fluids. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2009, 41, 129--142

    2009

  39. [47]

    H.; Cooper-White, J

    Tirtaatmadja, V.; McKinley, G. H.; Cooper-White, J. J. Drop formation and breakup of low viscosity elastic fluids: Effects of molecular weight and concentration. Physics of fluids 2006, 18

    2006

  40. [48]

    J.; Shen, A

    Del Giudice, F.; Haward, S. J.; Shen, A. Q. Relaxation time of dilute polymer solutions: A microfluidic approach. Journal of Rheology 2017, 61, 327--337

    2017

  41. [49]

    J.; Montanero, J

    Rubio, M.; Ponce-Torres, A.; Vega, E. J.; Montanero, J. M. Experimental analysis of the extensional flow of very weakly viscoelastic polymer solutions. Materials 2020, 13, 192

    2020

  42. [50]

    R.; Tabor, R

    Huang, E.; Skoufis, A.; Denning, T.; Qi, J.; Dagastine, R. R.; Tabor, R. F.; Berry, J. D. OpenDrop: Open-source software for pendant drop tensiometry & contact angle measurements. Journal of Open Source Software 2021, 6, 2604

    2021

  43. [51]

    Capillarity: deformable interfaces; Springer: New York, 2004; pp 1--31

    de Gennes, P.-G.; Brochard-Wyart, F.; Qu \'e r \'e , D.; de Gennes, P.-G.; Brochard-Wyart, F.; Qu \'e r \'e , D. Capillarity: deformable interfaces; Springer: New York, 2004; pp 1--31

    2004

  44. [52]

    J.; Puthenveettil, B

    Krishnan, S.; Hopfinger, E. J.; Puthenveettil, B. A. On the scaling of jetting from bubble collapse at a liquid surface. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2017, 822, 791--812

    2017

  45. [53]

    M.; Rodr \' guez Rodr \' guez, J

    Gordillo Arias de Saavedra, J. M.; Rodr \' guez Rodr \' guez, J. Capillary waves control the ejection of bubble bursting jets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 867, 556-571. 2019,

    2019

  46. [54]

    Hydrodynamics, 4th Edn; University Press: Cambridge, 1916

    Lamb, H. Hydrodynamics, 4th Edn; University Press: Cambridge, 1916

    1916

  47. [55]

    M.; Blanco-Rodr \' guez, F

    Gordillo, J. M.; Blanco-Rodr \' guez, F. J. Theory of the jets ejected after the inertial collapse of cavities with applications to bubble bursting jets. Physical Review Fluids 2023, 8, 073606

    2023

  48. [56]

    Elastocapillary worthington jets

    Sen, U.; Lohse, D.; Jalaal, M. Elastocapillary worthington jets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07928 2022,

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    bead-on-a-string

    Walls, P. L.; Henaux, L.; Bird, J. C. Jet drops from bursting bubbles: How gravity and viscosity couple to inhibit droplet production. Physical Review E 2015, 92, 021002 mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000014415614746002327011244 0ustar rootroot [journal=jac...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.