Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Entanglement Generation on the Double Quantum Transition of NV Ground State Via Globally Addressing Microwave Pulse

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a protocol that uses a single globally applied microwave pulse to directly prepare maximally entangled states of two parallel nitrogen-vacancy centers in the double quantum transition, with simulated fidelities up to…

desk verdict First credible global-pulse scheme for entangling parallel NV centers in the double-quantum basis, with a solid |N> protocol and an overreaching |P> claim plus a numerical inconsistency in the zero-field section. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18244 v2 pith:ASYJ2MY5 submitted 2025-01-30 quant-ph

Marcel Morillas-Rozas , Alberto López-García , Javier Cerrillo This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersdoublequantumtransitionHeisenberglimitentanglementgenerationRamantransferadiabaticeliminationglobalmicrowaveaddressingsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that two parallel, dipolarly coupled nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers—which are spectrally indistinguishable and therefore cannot be addressed individually—can be entangled directly from the ground state by a single monochromatic microwave pulse. This would be the first mechanism to prepare Heisenberg-limited sensing states in the parallel configuration, which is the only arrangement in which both NV centers couple identically to an external perturbation. Three protocols are identified: two finite-field Raman transfers that prepare the double-quantum states $|N\rangle$ and $|P\rangle$, and one zero-field scheme that produces a similar entangled superposition. The authors report simulated fidelities of 0.99972 for $|N\rangle$ and 0.99735 for $|P\rangle$, and argue that avoiding intermediate states suppresses noise and lets the preparation time count as sensing time.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective three-level Hamiltonian obtained by adiabatic elimination in the bright (fully symmetric) subspace of the two-NV system. After a basis change to symmetric and antisymmetric combinations, only six states are reachable from $|00\rangle$, and the antisymmetric block is exactly decoupled. Adiabatic elimination of three states in the bright sector produces the effective $3\times3$ Hamiltonian of Eq. (23) (for $|N\rangle$) and Eq. (29) (for $|P\rangle$), where the intermediate state acquires a shift $\delta$, or a coupling $\alpha$ and shifts $\delta'$, $\delta''$, that determine the resonant condition $2\Delta = -A_{zz}$ or $2\Delta = A_{zz}$. The coefficients $A_{xx}, A_{yy}, A_{zz}$ are the dipole-dipole coupling strengths along the respective axes, and $\theta$—the angle between the pair axis and the quantization axis—controls their relative magnitudes and thus the transfer speed and stability. In the zero-field case, eliminating $|P0+\rangle$ gives the effective coupling $\Omega_{\mathrm{eff}} = -\Omega^2/(4A_{xx})$, realizing the NV-ERC mapping.

What would settle it

Measure the population of $|P0+\rangle$ during the $|P\rangle$ transfer; the reduced $3\times3$ model predicts it stays near zero, while the paper's full simulation shows large oscillations, so a direct time-resolved measurement of that population would settle whether the adiabatic elimination is valid.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the double-quantum transition of a pair of parallel NV centers can be exploited as a synthetic three-level system once the dipole-dipole interaction is taken into account. By choosing the detuning so that the ground state $|00\rangle$ and the target entangled state are resonant, and by using the intermediate state $|P0+\rangle$ as a virtual level, a Raman transfer shuttles the population to $|N\rangle = (|+1-1\rangle + |-1+1\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$ or $|P\rangle = (|+1+1\rangle + |-1-1\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$. These states belong to the double-quantum transition (the two-quantum transition between $m_s=+1$ and $m_s=-1$), making $|N\rangle$ a sensitive probe of transverse electric fields and magnetic-field gradients, and $|P\rangle$ a longitudinal magnetic-field sensor with fourfold phase sensitivity over a single NV center, i.e., at the Heisenberg limit. The paper further shows that a zero-bias-field variant maps onto the NV-ERC scheme through the effective coupling $\Omega_{\mathrm{eff}} = -\Omega^2/(4A_{xx})$ and yields the maximally entangled superposition $|\Psi\rangle \simeq (|++\rangle + e^{-i\pi/4}|--\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the eliminated states stay essentially unpopulated, so the dynamics reduce to a $3\times3$ effective Hamiltonian; for the $|P\rangle$ protocol the paper's own Fig. 6 shows the intermediate state being significantly populated, so this premise is not fully met in one of the two main schemes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fourfold phase sensitivity of $|P\rangle$ means a pair of parallel NV centers prepared this way reaches the Heisenberg limit for longitudinal magnetic-field sensing, not just the standard quantum limit.
  • Because the intermediate states are (nominally) not populated, the preparation time can be counted as sensing time, shortening the total measurement cycle compared to protocols that prepare entanglement first and sense later.
  • Since the protocol uses a single monochromatic pulse and global addressing, it removes the need for spectral selection or individual addressing, making low-field and high-frequency operation feasible.
  • The zero-field scheme provides a route to the same class of entangled states in bias-field-free environments, which may simplify integration with other zero-field sensing techniques.
  • The generated $|N\rangle$ state, though insensitive to longitudinal fields, enables transverse-electric-field sensing and magnetic-field-gradient measurements with fourfold sensitivity over a single NV center.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetric/antisymmetric decomposition suggests the protocol could extend to more than two parallel NV centers by driving the fully symmetric sector, although the paper does not analyze multi-center registers.
  • Because the $|P\rangle$ protocol visibly populates the intermediate state (Fig. 6), the noise-suppression benefit is probably stronger for $|N\rangle$; a quantitative dephasing model would place error bars on the claimed fidelities.
  • A direct experiment could check the fourfold sensitivity by preparing $|P\rangle$, letting it accumulate phase under a known longitudinal field, and measuring the parity oscillation—this would validate the Heisenberg-limited claim without needing to resolve individual NV centers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes three protocols for preparing entangled states of two dipolarly coupled, spectrally indistinguishable parallel NV centers using a single globally addressing microwave pulse. The states belong to the double quantum transition: |N> = (|+1-1>+|-1+1>)/sqrt(2) and |P> = (|+1+1>+|-1-1>)/sqrt(2). The analysis introduces a symmetric/antisymmetric basis, uses adiabatic elimination to derive effective three-level Hamiltonians (Eqs. (24), (29), (36)), and checks the predicted transfers against full-Hamiltonian numerical evolution in Figs. 3, 6, and 10. Reported coherent fidelities are 0.99972 for |N> and 0.99735 for |P>. The paper additionally argues that avoiding intermediate states suppresses noise and allows state generation time to count as sensing time, leading to Heisenberg-limit-grade sensitivity.

Significance. The |N> protocol is the strongest part of the paper: it demonstrates preparation of a double-quantum entangled state of parallel NV centers with negligible intermediate-state population, and the claim is cross-checked by independent full-Hamiltonian numerics, so the target fidelity is an output rather than an input. The basis decomposition and adiabatic-elimination structure are clear and self-consistent. However, the paper's headline claim that both main protocols prepare entanglement 'without populating intermediate states' is contradicted by the |P> protocol, for which Fig. 6 and the text explicitly acknowledge significant oscillatory population of the intermediate state |P0+>. Because the noise-suppression and sensing-time advantages rest on this premise, they are not established for |P>. The zero-field scheme is an interesting additional route but is presented more briefly.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Fig. 6, Eq. (29)] The |P> protocol does not satisfy the paper's central 'without populating intermediate states' premise. The adiabatic elimination leading to Eq. (29) treats |P+->, |P0->, and |N> as eliminated, while |P0+> is the Raman intermediate; however, Fig. 6 shows the population of |P0+> oscillating with a significant amplitude during the transfer, and the text explicitly states this. Consequently, the claimed noise suppression and the argument in Sec. 2.2 that generation time can be counted as sensing time are unsupported for |P>. Please quantify the peak and time-integrated intermediate-state population and provide a concrete noise-sensitivity analysis, or explicitly restrict the no-intermediate-state claim to the |N> protocol.
  2. [Abstract, Sec. 2.3, Table 1, Conclusions] The abstract states that 'several mechanisms ... all of which avoid the involvement of intermediate states,' and Table 1 presents the |P> and |N> rows as sharing the same advantage. Since the |P> protocol visibly populates the intermediate state, this claim is overstated. The fidelity 0.99735 for |P> is a coherent-simulation number and does not by itself establish that transient intermediate-state population is harmless; the paper should either provide quantitative evidence of harmlessness or amend the claim.
  3. [Sec. 1 (after Eq. (18)) and Conclusions] The central motivation, namely the 'fourfold improved sensitivity' and attainment of the Heisenberg limit, is asserted without derivation. The manuscript should include the explicit sensitivity calculation (e.g., phase accumulation or quantum Fisher information) for the states |N> and |P> relative to a single NV center, and clarify whether 'fourfold' refers to phase accumulation, variance, or standard deviation. As written, the sensing advantage is a stated conclusion rather than a demonstrated result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2, first paragraph] The sentence 'This section into three main parts' is missing a verb; it should read 'This section is divided into three main parts.'
  2. [Sec. 1, after Eq. (16)] The phrase 'Since we the two NV centers are usually initialized' contains a grammatical error; it should read 'Since the two NV centers are usually initialized.'
  3. [Fig. 4 and Fig. 7] The legend labels '|P+□>' and '|P0□>' appear to be corrupted renderings of '|P+->' and '|P0->'; please ensure the figure text uses the same notation as the main text.
  4. [Eq. (25)] The denominator of the expression for δ contains a bracket structure that is hard to parse; reformat it with explicit fractions and parentheses for readability.
  5. [Table 1] For the quantum-annealing proposal [44], the text mentions generation of state |P> with fidelity 0.979, but the table row does not indicate which state is produced; please clarify the entry.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective-Hamiltonian derivations are explicit and the headline fidelities come from full-Hamiltonian simulation; the zero-field 1.293 coefficient is a designed control parameter rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Starting from the full two-NV Hamiltonian (Eq. 5), the paper performs an explicit basis change and RWA (Sec. 1, App. A) and then obtains each effective three-level Hamiltonian by writing out the 3x3 blocks and adiabatic elimination (Eqs. 23, 29, 36). The resonance conditions are not imported by citation: Appendix B derives the resonant detuning conditions as third-degree polynomials from those effective Hamiltonians. The headline fidelities (0.99972 for |N>, 0.99735 for |P>) are outputs of numerical evolution of the full Hamiltonian in Figs. 3 and 6, not inputs used to determine the protocol parameters. The zero-field constant Omega_eff = 1.293 Azz is introduced as 'we also find' and used to choose Axx for the full simulation; this is a control-parameter design step, and the subsequent full-Hamiltonian simulation in Fig. 10 is an independent check of the adiabatic-elimination approximation, so the result is not forced by construction. The self-citations [34,37] to NV-ERC are contextual: the paper re-derives the needed couplings and does not rely on a uniqueness theorem or on an unverified prior claim to forbid alternatives. One non-circularity caveat: the paper's own Fig. 6 and text admit that the |P> protocol significantly populates the intermediate |P0+> state, which weakens the 'without populating intermediate states' premise and the associated sensing-time/noise-suppression claims for that protocol; this is an internal-consistency/correctness concern, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The protocol depends on standard RWA and adiabatic elimination plus several hand-selected control parameters. The most consequential ad hoc input is the effective-coupling constant in the zero-field scheme. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • MW Rabi frequency Omega relative to dipole coupling = Omega = 10 times dipole scale for |N>, Omega = 40 A_zz in the zero-field example
    Hand-chosen to satisfy the adiabatic-elimination and Raman-transfer conditions, not determined by the equations.
  • Bias magnetic field mu B relative to Omega = mu B = 0.05 Omega for |N>, mu B = 0.001 Omega for |P>
    Chosen small to keep eliminated states weakly coupled and to enforce the hierarchy mu B << Omega < A_zz, A_xx.
  • MW detuning Delta = Solutions of the third-degree polynomial in Eqs. (47) and (51), close to +/- A_zz/2
    Chosen to make the Raman transfer resonant; it is a protocol control parameter rather than a fitted output, but it is tuned numerically.
  • Geometric angle theta between the NV pair axis and z = 0.426 pi for |N>, 0.292 pi for |P>, 0.303 pi in the zero-field example
    Selected to maximize transfer efficiency and to avoid the angle where A_zz = 0; the paper sweeps theta and then operates in favorable regions.
  • Effective coupling ratio Omega_eff / A_zz in the zero-field scheme = 1.293 in the text, 0.1293 in the Fig. 10 caption
    Introduced to produce an equal superposition of |++> and |--> while depopulating |00>; no derivation is shown and the text and caption disagree.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Rotating-wave approximation validity after transforming to the rotating frame
    Invoked in Sec. 1 and Appendix A to drop counter-rotating and cross terms, including the A_xz and A_zx dipole couplings; this requires the couplings to be small compared to the level spacings.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic elimination of intermediate states
    The effective Hamiltonians in Eqs. (23), (29), and (36) assume the eliminated states remain essentially unpopulated and respond adiabatically; this premise enters Secs. 2.1, 2.2, and 2.4 and is the load-bearing approximation of all three protocols.
  • domain assumption Dipole-dipole interaction with RWA-surviving terms only, and no exchange interaction
    The Hamiltonian in Eq. (6) keeps only A_xx, A_yy, A_zz terms and neglects exchange; the paper cites Kortan et al. [46] for the claim that exchange is negligible only above about 3 nm separation.
  • domain assumption Initialization in |00> and restriction to the symmetric bright subspace
    The paper argues in Sec. 1 that parallel NV centers behave as bosons, so starting from |00> the system remains in the 6-level bright subspace; the dark subspace is decoupled by symmetry.
  • domain assumption Identical coupling of both NV centers to external magnetic and electric perturbations
    The Heisenberg-limit and fourfold-sensitivity claims require that the two NV centers accumulate phase identically; this is the physical reason parallel axes are necessary, stated in the introduction and used throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entanglement Generation on the Double Quantum Transition of NV Ground State Via Globally Addressing Microwave Pulse." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ASYJ2MY5

@misc{pith2026250118244,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entanglement Generation on the Double Quantum Transition of NV Ground State Via Globally Addressing Microwave Pulse},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ASYJ2MY5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18244}
}
read the original abstract

Entanglement is a key quantum feature that enables quantum sensors to improve their sensitivity up to the Heisenberg limit. In the NV center platform, the Heisenberg limit can only be achieved when the axes of the NV centers are parallel. Nevertheless, parallel NV centers are spectrally indistinguishable and no mechanisms to directly prepare Heisenberg--limit--grade entanglement in such configurations are known to date. In this work we propose for the first time a viable mechanism to prepare entangled states in the double quantum transition of two dipolarly coupled NV centers whose axes are parallel without populating intermediate states, so as to reach the Heisenberg limit in sensing. Our approach is based on the NV effective Raman coupling (NV-ERC) protocol and makes use of global addressing of both NV centers with a single monochromatic microwave pulse. Supported by an adiabatic elimination analysis, several mechanisms for the preparation of different entangled states are identified, all of which avoid the involvement of intermediate states. This not only minimizes the impact of additional noise sources, but also enables the state generation process itself to serve as effective sensing time--an advantage over conventional approaches where such preparation typically constitutes a separate, non--contributory stage. We consider the generation of different entangled states belonging to the double quantum transition, sensitive to either transverse electric fields or longitudinal magnetic fields, all with a fourfold improved sensitivity compared to conventional single NV settings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18244 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Energy levels of the 2 NV center system in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Energy levels of the system of two interacting NV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Time evolution of the population in the |N⟩ state for θ ∈ [0, π/2] with µB = 0.05Ω and (µ0µ 2 )/(4πr3 ) = 10Ω. The black line follows the maximum achieved popula￾tion for each value of θ. 0 π/8 π/4 3π/8 π/2 θ 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 max { P|Ni} Efficient Raman A transfer zz = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Maximum population in the |N⟩ state depending on the angle θ. The shaded region in orange corresponds to the region where Azz vanishes and therefore the transfer is not achieved using µB = 0.05Ω and (µ0µ 2 )/(4πr3 ) = 10Ω. The blue shaded region corresponds to the angl…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Raman transfer from state |00⟩ to |P⟩ aided by the intermediate state |P0+⟩ with µB = 0.001Ω, θ = 0.292π, (µ0µ 2 )/(4πr3 ) = 9.09Ω and ∆ = 0.504Azz. When θ = 0 the states |00⟩, |P0+⟩ and |N⟩ are res￾onant, allowing Raman transfer to happen faster. As θ grows, the detun…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Maximum population in the |P⟩ state depending on the angle θ. The shaded region in blue corresponds to the region where an efficient Raman transfer is accomplished using µB = 0.001Ω and (µ0µ 2 )/(4πr3 ) = 9.091Ω. The shaded region in orange and signaled with an arrow c…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) States of the system in zero field conditions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Evolution of the four states in the absence of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Time evolution of the population in the |N⟩ state for θ ∈ [0, π/2] with µB = 0.05Ω, (µ0µ 2 )/(4πr3 ) = 10Ω and ∆ = −Azz/2. The black line follows the maximum achieved population for each value of θ. The same happens in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Time evolution of the population in the |P⟩ state for θ ∈ [0, π/2] with µB = 0.001Ω, (µ0µ 2 )/(4πr3 ) = 9.091Ω and ∆ = Azz/2. The black line follows the maxi￾mum achieved population for each value of θ. It can therefore be said that slight variations of the solution f…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Control Protocols for Entangling Gates for Group-IV Color-Centers in Diamond

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Three entangling gate types (ZZ, ZX, YY) for group-IV color centers are analyzed via dynamical decoupling, double-quantum transitions, optimal control, and algebraic decomposition, yielding quantum speed limits and pr...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Jelezko, I

    F. Jelezko, I. Popa, A. Gruber, C. Tietz, J. Wrachtrup, A. Nizovtsev, and S. Kilin. Single spin states in a defect center resolved by optical spectroscopy.Applied Physics Letters, 81:2160,

    work page

  2. [2]

    Jelezko, T

    F. Jelezko, T. Gaebel, I. Popa, A. Gruber, and J. Wrachtrup. Observation of coher- ent oscillations in a single electron spin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92:076401, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.076401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.076401 2004

  3. [3]

    Doherty, Neil B

    Marcus W. Doherty, Neil B. Man- son, Paul Delaney, Fedor Jelezko, Jörg Wrachtrup, and Lloyd C.L. Hollenberg. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in dia- mond.Physics Reports, 528:1, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001 2013

  4. [4]

    Glenn, D

    D. Glenn, D. Bucher, J. Lee, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and A. Yacoby. High-resolution magnetic resonance spectroscopy using a solid- state spin sensor.Nature, 555:351, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25781

    doi:10.1038/nature25781 2018

  5. [5]

    A. Ajoy, U. Bissbort, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and P. Cappellaro. Atomic-scale nuclear spin imaging us- ing quantum-assisted sensors in diamond. Phys. Rev. X, 5:011001, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.011001 2015

  6. [6]

    Webb, Joshua D

    James L. Webb, Joshua D. Clement, Luca Troise, Sepehr Ahmadi, Gustav Juhl Johansen, Alexan- der Huck, and Ulrik L. Andersen. Nanotesla sen- sitivity magnetic field sensing using a compact diamond nitrogen-vacancy magnetometer.Ap- plied Physics Letters, 114:231103, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5095241

    doi:10.1063/1.5095241 2019

  7. [7]

    Iwata, Till Lenz, Julia Michl, Boris Yavkin, Kazuo Naka- mura, Hitoshi Sumiya, Takeshi Ohshima, Junichi Isoya, Jörg Wrachtrup, Arne Wickenbrock, and Dmitry Budker

    Huijie Zheng, Jingyan Xu, Geoffrey Z. Iwata, Till Lenz, Julia Michl, Boris Yavkin, Kazuo Naka- mura, Hitoshi Sumiya, Takeshi Ohshima, Junichi Isoya, Jörg Wrachtrup, Arne Wickenbrock, and Dmitry Budker. Zero-field magnetometry based on nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in dia- mond.Phys. Rev. Appl., 11:064068, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064068

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.064068 2019

  8. [8]

    Müller, X

    C. Müller, X. Kong, J. M. Cai, K. Melen- tijevic, R. J. Stöhr, J. Du, M. B. Plenio, and F. Jelezko. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with single spin sensitivity.Na- ture Communications, 5:4703, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5703

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms5703 2014

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Dolde, H

    F. Dolde, H. Fedder, M. Doherty, T. Nöbauer, F. Rempp, G. Balasubramanian, T. Wolf, F. Reinhard, L. C. L. Hollenberg, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup. Electric-field sensing using sin- gle diamond spins.Nature Physics, 7:459, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1969

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    Chen, Hannah A

    Edward H. Chen, Hannah A. Clevenson, Kerry A. Johnson, Linh M. Pham, Dirk R. Englund, Philip R. Hemmer, and Danielle A. Braje. High-sensitivity spin-based electrometry with an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.Phys. Rev. A, 95:053417, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/1...

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Neumann, I

    P. Neumann, I. Jakobi, F. Dolde, C. Burk, R. Reuter, G. Waldherr, J. Honert, T. Wolf, A. Brunner, J. H. Shim, D. Suter, H. Sumiya, J. Isoya, and J. Wrachtrup. High-precision nanoscale temperature sensing using single de- fects in diamond.Nano Letters, 13:2738, 2013. DOI: https...

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    Chen, Terumitsu Azuma, Be-Ming Chang, Feng-Jen Hsieh, and Huan-Cheng Chang

    Yuen Yung Hui, Oliver Y. Chen, Terumitsu Azuma, Be-Ming Chang, Feng-Jen Hsieh, and Huan-Cheng Chang. All-optical thermometry with nitrogen-vacancy centers in nanodiamond- embedded polymer films.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 123:15366, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/...

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Doherty, Ju- lia Michl, Ingmar Jakobi, Boris Naydenov, Sebastien Pezzagna, Jan Meijer, Philipp Neu- mann, Fedor Jelezko, Neil B

    Florian Dolde, Marcus W. Doherty, Ju- lia Michl, Ingmar Jakobi, Boris Naydenov, Sebastien Pezzagna, Jan Meijer, Philipp Neu- mann, Fedor Jelezko, Neil B. Manson, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Nanoscale detection of a single fundamental charge in ambient con- ditions using theNV − center...

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    Design of high sensitivity mag- netometer based on diamond nitrogen-vacancy centersandweaksignaloutputmodule.Diamond and Related Materials, page 111858, 2024

    Qin Hu, Kun Huang, Xiaobiao Mao, Guihao Ran, Xinhui He, Zhennan Lin, Tao Hu, and Shuangquan Ran. Design of high sensitivity mag- netometer based on diamond nitrogen-vacancy centersandweaksignaloutputmodule.Diamond and Related Materials, page 111858, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Shaoyi Xu, Mingzhe Liu, Tianyu Xie, Zhiyuan 10 Zhao, Qian Shi, Pei Yu, Chang-Kui Duan, Fazhan Shi, and Jiangfeng Du. High-precision measurements and first-principles expla- nation of the temperature-dependent 13C and 14Nhyperfine interactions of single nv− centers in diamond a...

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Rakonjac, Yu-Hui Chen, Sebastian P

    Jelena V. Rakonjac, Yu-Hui Chen, Sebastian P. Horvath, and Jevon J. Longdell. Long spin coher- ence times in the ground state and in an optically excited state of 167Er3+ : y 2sio5 at zero mag- netic field.Phys. Rev. B, 101:184430, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.1...

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    March, Benjamin D

    James E. March, Benjamin D. Wood, Colin J. Stephen, Laura Durán Fervenza, Ben G. Breeze, Soumen Mandal, Andrew M. Edmonds, Daniel J. Twitchen, Matthew L. Markham, Oliver A. Williams, and Gavin W. Morley. Long spin coherence and relaxation times in nanodi- amonds milled from po...

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    B. D. Wood, G. A. Stimpson, J. E. March, Y. N. D. Lekhai, C. J. Stephen, B. L. Green, A. C. Frangeskou, L. Ginés, S. Man- dal, O. A. Williams, and G. W. Mor- ley. Long spin coherence times of nitro- gen vacancy centers in milled nanodiamonds. Phys. Rev. B, 105:205401, 2022. DO...

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cap- pellaro. Quantum sensing.Rev. Mod. Phys., 89:035002, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    Modified carr-purcell-meiboom- gill sequence for nmr fourier imaging applica- tions.Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 69: 488, 1986

    A.A Maudsley. Modified carr-purcell-meiboom- gill sequence for nmr fourier imaging applica- tions.Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 69: 488, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 2364(86)90160-5

    1969 doi

  13. [21]

    Souza, Gonzalo A

    Alexandre M. Souza, Gonzalo A. Álvarez, and Dieter Suter. Robust dynamical decoupling for quantum computing and quantum mem- ory.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:240501, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.240501

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    Protection of quantum systems by nested dynamical decou- pling.Phys

    Zhen-Yu Wang and Ren-Bao Liu. Protection of quantum systems by nested dynamical decou- pling.Phys. Rev. A, 83:022306, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.022306

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Single-ion quantum lock-in amplifier.Nature, 473:61, 2011

    Shlomi Kotler, Nitzan Akerman, Yinnon Glick- man, AnnaKeselman, andRoeeOzeri. Single-ion quantum lock-in amplifier.Nature, 473:61, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10010

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    Lutchyn, Cody P

    Łukasz Cywiński, Roman M. Lutchyn, Cody P. Nave, and S. Das Sarma. How to en- hance dephasing time in superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. B, 77:174509, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.174509

    2008 doi

  17. [25]

    Götz S. Uhrig. Keeping a quantum bit alive by optimizedπ-pulse sequences. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:100504, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.100504

    2007 doi

  18. [26]

    de Lange, Z

    G. de Lange, Z. H. Wang, D. Ristè, V. V. Do- brovitski, and R. Hanson. Universal dynami- cal decoupling of a single solid-state spin from a spin bath.Science, 330:60, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192739

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    C. A. Ryan, J. S. Hodges, and D. G. Cory. Robust decoupling techniques to extend quantum coherence in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:200402, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.200402

    2010 doi

  20. [28]

    Hall, Chang Shin, Helmut Fedder, Lloyd C

    Boris Naydenov, Florian Dolde, Liam T. Hall, Chang Shin, Helmut Fedder, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, Fedor Jelezko, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Dynamical decoupling of a single-electron spin at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B, 83:081201, Feb 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.081201

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    Casanova, Z.-Y

    J. Casanova, Z.-Y. Wang, J. F. Haase, and M. B. Plenio. Robust dynamical decoupling se- quences for individual-nuclear-spin addressing. Phys. Rev. A, 92:042304, Oct 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.042304

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    Abobeih, J

    M.H. Abobeih, J. Cramer, M.A. Bakker, J.L. Zwerver, A. Albrecht, J.L. Lee, F.J. Here- mans, N.Y. Yao, G. De Lange, and R. Hanson. One-second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environ- ment.Nature Communications, 9, 2018. DOI: https://do...

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    Lang, Simon Schmitt, Johannes Lang, Jorge Casanova, Liam McGuin- ness, Tania S

    Zhen-Yu Wang, Jacob E. Lang, Simon Schmitt, Johannes Lang, Jorge Casanova, Liam McGuin- ness, Tania S. Monteiro, Fedor Jelezko, and Martin B. Plenio. Randomization of pulse phases for unambiguous and robust quantum sensing. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122:200403, May 2019. DOI: https://...

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    T. Joas, F. Ferlemann, R. Sailer, P. J. Vet- ter, J. Zhang, R. S. Said, T. Teraji, S. On- oda, T. Calarco, G. Genov, M. M. Müller, and F. Jelezko. High-fidelity electron spin gates for scaling diamond quantum regis- ters.Phys. Rev. X, 15:021069, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1...

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    Dolde, I

    F. Dolde, I. Jakobi, B. Naydenov, N. Zhao, S. Pezzagna, C. Trautmann, J. Meijer, P. Neu- mann, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup. Room- temperature entanglement between single defect spins in diamond.Nature Physics, 9(3):139–143,

  26. [34]

    Cerrillo, S

    J. Cerrillo, S. Oviedo Casado, and J. Prior. Low field nano-nmr via three-level system control. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126:220402, Jun 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.220402

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    Vetter, Alastair Marshall, Genko T

    Philipp J. Vetter, Alastair Marshall, Genko T. 11 Genov, Tim F. Weiss, Nico Striegler, Eva F. Großmann, Santiago Oviedo-Casado, Javier Cerrillo, Javier Prior, Philipp Neumann, and Fedor Jelezko. Zero- and low-field sens- ing with nitrogen-vacancy centers.Phys. Rev. Appl., 17:0...

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    Zero- field quantum sensing via precise geomet- ric controls for a spin-1 system.Phys

    Zhijie Li, Xiangyu Ye, Xi Kong, Tianyu Xie, Zhiping Yang, Pengju Zhao, Ya Wang, Fazhan Shi, and Jiangfeng Du. Zero- field quantum sensing via precise geomet- ric controls for a spin-1 system.Phys. Rev. Appl., 21:054011, May 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.054011

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    López-García and J

    A. López-García and J. Cerrillo. Full qubit control of the double quantum transition in nv centers for low-field or high-frequency sens- ing.EPJ Quantum Technology, 12:52, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025- 00358-x

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Beat- ing the standard quantum limit under am- bient conditions with solid-state spins.Sci- ence Advances, 7(32):eabg9204, 2021

    Tianyu Xie, Zhiyuan Zhao, Xi Kong, Wen- chao Ma, Mengqi Wang, Xiangyu Ye, Pei Yu, Zhiping Yang, Shaoyi Xu, Pengfei Wang, Ya Wang, Fazhan Shi, and Jiangfeng Du. Beat- ing the standard quantum limit under am- bient conditions with solid-state spins.Sci- ence Advances, 7(32):eabg...

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    Demonstration of entanglement-enhanced phase estimation in solid.Nature Communications, 6, 2015

    Gang-Qin Liu, Yu-Ran Zhang, Yan-Chun Chang, Jie-Dong Yue, Heng Fan, Xin-Yu Pan, Peng Li, and Wei Zhao. Demonstration of entanglement-enhanced phase estimation in solid.Nature Communications, 6, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7726

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    High-fidelity entangling gates for electron and nuclear spin qubits in dia- mond.Phys

    Regina Finsterhoelzl, Wolf-Rüdiger Hannes, and Guido Burkard. High-fidelity entangling gates for electron and nuclear spin qubits in dia- mond.Phys. Rev. B, 111:214104, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.214104

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    Bermudez, F

    A. Bermudez, F. Jelezko, M. B. Plenio, and A. Retzker. Electron-mediated nuclear-spin interactions between distant nitrogen-vacancy centers.Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:150503, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.150503

    2011 doi

  34. [42]

    S. D. Bennett, N. Y. Yao, J. Otterbach, P. Zoller, P. Rabl, and M. D. Lukin. Phonon- induced spin-spin interactions in diamond nanostructures: Application to spin squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:156402, Apr 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.156402

    2013 doi

  35. [43]

    Pedrocchi, and Daniel Loss

    Luka Trifunovic, Fabio L. Pedrocchi, and Daniel Loss. Long-distance entan- glement of spin qubits via ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. X, 3:041023, Dec 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041023

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    Generation of multipartite en- tanglement between spin-1 particles with bifurcation-based quantum annealing.Sci- entific Reports, 12(1):14988, 2022

    Yuichiro Matsuzaki, Takashi Imoto, and Yuki Susa. Generation of multipartite en- tanglement between spin-1 particles with bifurcation-based quantum annealing.Sci- entific Reports, 12(1):14988, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17621-1

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Greenberger, Michael A

    Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael A. Horne, and Anton Zeilinger. Going beyond bell’s theorem. In M. Kafatos, editor,Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, pages 69–72. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989

    1989

  38. [46]

    V. R. Kortan, C. Şahin, and M. E. Flatté. Nanometer-scale exchange inter- actions between spin centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B, 93:220402, Jun 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.220402

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    Enhancement of the creation yield of nv ensembles in a chem- ically vapour deposited diamond.Carbon, 194:282–289, 2022

    Priyadharshini Balasubramanian, Christian Os- terkamp, Ovidiu Brinza, Maxime Rollo, Is- abelle Robert-Philip, Philippe Goldner, Vin- cent Jacques, Fedor Jelezko, Jocelyn Achard, and Alexandre Tallaire. Enhancement of the creation yield of nv ensembles in a chem- ically vapour ...

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Ender, Nancy C

    Jiaxu Liang, Christopher P. Ender, Nancy C. Forero-Martinez, Jingyi Liu, Xin Yang, Raul Gonzalez Brouwer, Lev Kazak, Yizhi Liu, Tobias Eklund, Mangalika Sinha, Sarah Köster, Shrikant Bhat, Fabian Rohmann, An- dreas Tangemann, Kilian Lee Gallo, Rüdiger Berger, Robert Farla, Ale...

    2025

  41. [2002]

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1507838

    doi

  42. [2013]

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2545

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.