Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 80 references

Quasi-Two-Body $B\to P (K^+K^-, \pi^+\pi^-)$ Decays with $f_0(980)$ Resonance

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts the branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries of the quasi-two-body decays $B\to P(f_0(980)\to K^+K^-,\pi^+\pi^-)$ in perturbative QCD, and shows that the two-body $B\to P f_0(980)$ rates are cleanly accessible…

desk verdict Solid PQCD calculation with an honest NWA caveat, but the KK-channel 'agreement' is partly postdiction from the same group's earlier fits. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18907 v1 pith:ZE33N7AP submitted 2025-01-31 hep-ph hep-ex

Ya-Xin Wang , Jun-Peng Wang , Ying Li , Zhi-Tian Zou This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex PACS 13.25.Hw12.38.Bx
keywords quasi-two-bodyBdecaysf0(980)resonanceperturbativeQCDapproachbranchingfractionsdirectCPasymmetryFlattéformfactortwo-mesondistributionamplitudesnarrow-widthapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the perturbative QCD (PQCD) factorization framework, supplied with a coupled-channel Flatté parametrization of the $f_0(980)$ timelike form factor and S-wave two-meson distribution amplitudes, can describe the quasi-two-body decays $B\to P(f_0(980)\to K^+K^-,\pi^+\pi^-)$ for $P=\pi,K$. It predicts their CP-averaged branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries, finding rates in the $10^{-8}$ to $10^{-6}$ range and agreement with existing B-factory results for several $B\to K f_0$ modes. It also argues that the narrow-width approximation can be used to extract two-body $B\to P f_0(980)$ branching fractions from the $\pi^+\pi^-$ channels, and that the same extraction from $K^+K^-$ is kinematically invalid because $f_0(980)\to KK$ is effectively off-shell. If the framework is reliable, these channels provide a probe of the $f_0(980)$ resonance and of hadronic three-body dynamics in $B$ decays.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the S-wave two-meson light-cone distribution amplitude $\Phi_{M_2M_3}(z,\xi,\omega)$, whose twist-2 part is expanded in Gegenbauer polynomials with moments $B_1$ and $B_3$ and whose overall normalization is the timelike form factor $F_S(\omega)$. The paper models $F_S(\omega)$ with the updated Flatté form, including $\pi\pi$ and $KK$ phase-space factors and an exponential damping $e^{-\alpha q^2}$ for the $KK$ channel, then inserts this into the PQCD convolution $\Phi_B\otimes\Phi_{M_1}\otimes\Phi_{M_2M_3}\otimes H$. The narrow-width relation between quasi-two-body and two-body rates then converts the predicted $\pi^+\pi^-$ channels into two-body $B\to P f_0(980)$ branching fractions, while the same relation is shown to fail for the $KK$ channels.

What would settle it

A Dalitz-plot measurement of $B^+\to\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-$ that fits the $\pi^+\pi^-$ mass spectrum near 1 GeV and finds a $f_0(980)$ contribution whose branching fraction lies outside the predicted window, or whose peak position and width disagree with the adopted Flatté parameters, would refute the central prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the PQCD factorization formula, evaluated with the updated relativistic Flatté form for the timelike form factor $F_S(\omega)$ and with the adopted Gegenbauer moments for the $KK$ and $\pi\pi$ pairs, predicts branching fractions in $10^{-8}$ to $10^{-6}$ for the quasi-two-body modes $B\to P(f_0(980)\to K^+K^-,\pi^+\pi^-)$, with several $B\to K f_0$ channels consistent with measured rates. It further establishes that the narrow-width approximation connects the $\pi^+\pi^-$ quasi-two-body modes to the two-body branching fractions, giving values such as $\mathrm{BF}[B^0\to K^0 f_0(980)]\approx 17.5\times10^{-6}$ and $\mathrm{BF}[B^+\to K^+ f_0(980)]\approx 21\times10^{-6}$ that agree with earlier two-body calculations, while the $K^+K^-$ modes cannot be used for such an extraction because the $f_0(980)\to KK$ transition is kinematically suppressed at the resonance mass.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation leans on the assumption that the shape parameters of the pion-pair and kaon-pair wave functions, fitted to earlier data rather than derived from QCD, are correct; if they are wrong, the predicted branching fractions and CP asymmetries shift by large factors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The predicted $B\to K f_0(980)$ rates near $10^{-6}$ are large enough that high-statistics three-body analyses should be able to confirm or rule out the assumed $f_0(980)$ line shape.
  • The predicted $B\to \pi f_0(980)$ rates near $10^{-8}$–$10^{-7}$ are small, but their predicted direct CP asymmetries are large, making them targets for CP-violation searches even before precise rate measurements.
  • The extracted two-body values, such as $\mathrm{BF}[B^0\to K^0 f_0(980)]\approx 17.5\times10^{-6}$ and $\mathrm{BF}[B^+\to\pi^+ f_0(980)]\approx 1.3\times10^{-6}$, give concrete baselines for independent two-body determinations.
  • The kinematic argument that $KK$ final states cannot be used with the narrow-width approximation should govern other attempts to extract $f_0(980)$ couplings from $KK$ modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a precision Dalitz-plot measurement of the $\pi^+\pi^-$ mass spectrum near 1 GeV in these decays would effectively measure the Flatté couplings $g_{\pi\pi}$ and $g_{KK}$, turning this decay class into a spectrometer for the $f_0(980)$ internal structure.
  • Editorial inference: the large predicted CP asymmetries in the pion modes are a sharper test of the model than the branching fractions, because shape-parameter uncertainties partially cancel; a null measurement at that magnitude would indicate missing contributions or a wrong strong-phase input.
  • Editorial inference: the same two-meson machinery should extend to charmonium-plus-pion-pair decays such as $B_s\to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$, where the $\pi\pi$ channel is kinematically open for $f_0(980)$, and the paper's narrow-width caveat suggests those extractions are more trustworthy than $KK$-based ones.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the quasi-two-body decays B(s) → P(f0(980) → K+K-, π+π-) with P = π, K in the perturbative QCD (PQCD) approach. The authors model the S-wave two-meson distribution amplitudes through Gegenbauer moments, parametrize the timelike form factor with a Flatté form, and compute CP-averaged branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries for ten modes. They compare the B → K modes with BaBar and Belle data, extract B → P f0(980) branching fractions from the π+π- channels using the narrow-width approximation, and argue that the same extraction cannot be performed for the KK channels.

Significance. The paper is a straightforward application and modest update of an established PQCD quasi-two-body framework. Its strengths are that it treats the KK and ππ channels in a common formalism, uses an updated Flatté parametrization, and lists separate uncertainty sources. It also makes falsifiable predictions for unmeasured Bs modes and for potentially large direct CP asymmetries in B → π(ππ). The central values are not parameter-free: the Gegenbauer moments and Flatté couplings are phenomenological inputs, so agreement with data tests the whole model rather than QCD dynamics alone. The explicit kinematic caveat against applying the narrow-width approximation to the KK channels is a useful methodological point.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Eq. (16); Table 1] The KK-pair Gegenbauer moments B1 = -0.8 and B3 = 0.2 are adopted from Refs. [19,65], and Ref. [19] is the same group's earlier PQCD analysis of B → KKK in which the f0(980) → K+K- signal is present. The B → K(K+K-) entries in Table 1 are therefore not independent predictions from QCD; their agreement with BaBar/Belle is to an important extent a postdiction of the inputs used to fix the moments. Please either refit the KK moments to a data set that excludes the B → KKK f0 signal, or explicitly present the KK comparison as an internal consistency check rather than as a successful prediction.
  2. [§3, Table 1; §2, Eq. (19)] The numerical results are not fully reproducible because the invariant-mass integration window used to define the quasi-two-body branching fractions and the 'local' CP asymmetries is not stated anywhere in the paper. Because FS(ω) in Eq. (19) has a Flatté line shape with strong threshold behavior, the branching fractions in Table 1 depend on this window. The paper also does not list the numerical values of m_f0, gππ, and gKK used in Eq. (19), quoting only α ≈ 2.0 GeV^-2; these parameters must be given for the predictions to be checkable.
  3. [§2, Eqs. (21)–(32)] The hard-scattering functions F, M, A, and W that appear in the amplitudes are not defined in this paper; the text says their full expressions can be found in Ref. [19]. Since Ref. [19] deliberately neglects the kaon mass and the C3/2_3 Gegenbauer term, whereas the present calculation includes both, the amplitudes used here are not identical to those in Ref. [19], and the updated expressions should be supplied, for example in an appendix.
  4. [§3, Table 1] The statement that the theoretical results show 'satisfactory agreement' with experiment overstates the constraining power of the comparison. For instance, B0 → K0(π+π-) is predicted as 8.77^{+6.85}_{-5.76} (first error only) against the experimental 8.1 ± 0.8, so the model is consistent with data but is not tested at a meaningful level. The same is true for most of the CP asymmetries, whose uncertainties are as large as or larger than the central values. The conclusion should be softened to consistency within large model uncertainties.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] The header 'localed direct CP asymmetries' should read 'local' or 'integrated', and the phrase 'local direct CP asymmetries' should be defined in the text.
  2. [§4, after Eq. (38)] The statement that f0(980) → K+K- is 'kinematically' forbidden is inaccurate; with m_f0 ≈ 990 MeV and 2m_K ≈ 987 MeV the decay is kinematically open but phase-space suppressed. The reason for not using the narrow-width approximation is the finite width and threshold distortion, which the text should state.
  3. [§3, Eq. (34)] The notation Λ_f=4_QCD is nonstandard and should be written as Λ_QCD^(4) or an equivalent standard form.
  4. [Table 1] The table lists MFA predictions from Ref. [12], but the text does not discuss them; a sentence explaining the comparison with the MFA results would help the reader.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

KK Gegenbauer moments are inherited from the same group's B→KKK f0(980) fit, so the KK-channel 'agreement' is a postdiction; the ππ and Bs predictions remain genuinely predictive.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 2, after Eq. (18); Table 1, rows B0→K0(K+K−) and B+→K+(K+K−)]
    "the values of the Gegenbauer moments B1,3 are determined through a combination of theoretical modeling and current experimental data. In this work, we adopt B1 = −0.8 and B3 = 0.2 for KK pair [19, 65], and B1 = −0.8 and B3 = 0.72 for ππ pair [66]. ... In addition, in Ref. [19], we had investigated the quasi-two-body B→KKK decays with the intermediate f0(980) resonance ... In the current work, we update this analysis ..."

    The two-meson LCDA, Eqs. (15)–(18), has no QCD-derived S-wave shape; B1 and B3 are its only shape parameters. For the KK pair these are taken from Refs. [19, 65], and Ref. [19] is the same authors' earlier PQCD analysis of B→KKK with the f0(980) resonance. The paper itself states that the moments are 'determined through a combination of theoretical modeling and current experimental data.' Table 1 then presents the resulting B0→K0(K+K−)=8.22×10−6 and B+→K+(K+K−)=8.50×10−6 as PQCD 'predictions' and calls the agreement with BaBar/Belle (7.0 and 9.4×10−6) satisfactory. Those measurements are the same B→KKK f0(980)→K+K− signals used to shape the KK moments, so the KK-channel agreement is a refit/postdiction rather than an independent test. The ππ rows, using moments from Ref.

full rationale

Most of the paper is a normal model application: the weak effective Hamiltonian, PQCD hard kernels, two-meson LCDA parametrization, Flatté form factor from LHCb, and the f0/σ mixing angle are stated external inputs. The ππ-channel predictions use moments from Ref. [66] and are compared with BaBar/Belle B→Kππ data that were not used to fix those moments, so those comparisons are independent checks. The Bs predictions are also genuinely new. The narrow-width extraction from the ππ channel is a standard input/output relation, and the paper explicitly avoids the kinematically forbidden KK extraction. The circular portion is confined to the KK-mode comparison: the KK Gegenbauer moments B1=-0.8, B3=0.2 are adopted from the same group's earlier B→KKK f0(980) analysis, and the paper acknowledges the moments are constrained by experimental data. Thus the quoted agreement for B0→K0(K+K−) and B+→K+(K+K−) partially re-exposes the data that shaped the KK LCDA. This is a partial circularity, not a full one, because the central framework and the ππ/Bs predictions remain independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The predictions rest on a chain of phenomenological inputs: the two-meson distribution amplitude parameters (Gegenbauer moments) fit to prior B-decay data, the Flatté parameters for the resonance shape, the mixing angle, and the f0(980) to ππ branching fraction. None of these are derived in this paper; each is imported from earlier analyses, several of them by the same authors.

free parameters (7)
  • B1 (KK Gegenbauer moment) = -0.8
    Taken from Ref [19], the authors' earlier B -> KKK PQCD analysis, and Ref [65]; used in the twist-2 LCDA of the KK pair.
  • B3 (KK Gegenbauer moment) = 0.2
    Same source as B1 for the KK pair; fixed from prior fits.
  • B1 (ππ Gegenbauer moment) = -0.8
    Taken from Ref [66] for the S-wave ππ pair.
  • B3 (ππ Gegenbauer moment) = 0.72
    Taken from Ref [66] for the S-wave ππ pair.
  • f0(980) mixing angle θ = 17 degrees
    Adopted from Ref [75], where it was chosen to match B -> f0(980)K data.
  • Flatté couplings gππ, gKK and damping parameter α = α≈2.0 GeV^-2; gππ and gKK from Ref [72]
    These parameters set the shape and width of the f0(980) in the timelike form factor Eq. (19).
  • BF[f0(980) -> π+π-] = 0.50 (+0.07,-0.09)
    Derived from the BES measurement of the ratio Γ(ππ)/[Γ(ππ)+Γ(KK)] plus isospin; used in the narrow-width extraction.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PQCD factorization formula A ~ Φ_B ⊗ Φ_M1 ⊗ Φ_{M2M3} ⊗ H is valid at leading order for quasi-two-body decays.
    Invoked in Sec. 2, Eq. (2); no proof of higher-order or power corrections beyond scale variation.
  • domain assumption The two-meson LCDAs can be truncated to Gegenbauer terms B1 and B3, with twist-3 LCDAs taken in their asymptotic forms.
    Eqs. (16)-(18); the convergence of this Gegenbauer expansion is assumed.
  • domain assumption The timelike form factor FS(ω) is described by the Flatté model of Eq. (19) with parameters from Refs [71,72].
    This model choice affects all central values and replaces the naive Breit-Wigner shape.
  • standard math The Standard Model operator basis and Wilson coefficients as given by Buchalla et al.
    Eq. (3) and the effective Hamiltonian in Sec. 2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasi-Two-Body $B\to P (K^+K^-, \pi^+\pi^-)$ Decays with $f_0(980)$ Resonance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZE33N7AP

@misc{pith2026250118907,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasi-Two-Body $B\to P (K^+K^-, \pi^+\pi^-)$ Decays with $f_0(980)$ Resonance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZE33N7AP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18907}
}
abstract

In this study, we investigate the $CP$-averaged branching fractions and direct $CP$ asymmetries in the quasi-two-body decays $B\to P (f_0(980) \to )(K^+K^-, \pi^+\pi^-)$ within the framework of perturbative QCD approach, where $P$ denotes light pseudoscalar mesons ($\pi$,$K$). The timelike form factor $F_{S}(\omega)$, characterizing final-state interactions between collinear particles in the resonant region, is modeled through the revised relativistic Breit-Wigner formalism for the $S$-wave $f_0(980)$ resonance. Within the Gegenbauer moments of the $S$-wave two-meson distribution amplitudes constrained by current data, we predict the branching fractions of $B\to P (f_0(980) \to )(K^+K^-, \pi^+\pi^-)$ to lie in the range of $10^{-8}$ to $10^{-6}$. Our calculations reveal that our theoretical results for some decay modes exhibit satisfactory agreement with existing measurements from the BaBar and Belle collaborations. Furthermore, we extract the corresponding branching fractions of $B \to P f_0(980)$ decays from the quasi-two-body counterparts $B\to P (f_0(980) \to )\pi^+\pi^-$ rather than $B\to P (f_0(980) \to )K^+K^-$. All predictions are awaiting experimental verification in current and upcoming collider experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18907 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Typical Feynman diagrams for the quasi-two-body d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [66]

    $S$-wave contributions to the $B_{(s)}\rightarrow \chi_{c1} (\pi\pi,K\pi,KK)$ decays

    M.-K. Jia, C.-Q. Zhang, J.-M. Li, and Z. Rui, S-wave contributions to the B (s) → χ c1(ππ ,Kπ ,KK ) decays, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 7 073001, [ arXiv:2107.13882]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  2. [19]

    Z.-T. Zou, Y . Li, Q.-X. Li, and X. Liu, Resonant contributions to three-body B → KKK decays in perturbative QCD approach , Eur . Phys. J. C80 (2020), no. 5 394, [ arXiv:2003.03754]. 16

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  3. [1]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, Prog. Theor . Phys.49 (1973) 652–657

    work page 1973

  4. [2]

    BaBar, Belle Collaboration, A. J. Bevan et al., The Physics of the B Factories , Eur . Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3026, [ arXiv:1406.6311]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [3]

    Kuhr, Flavor physics at the Tevatron, Springer Tracts Mod.Phys

    T. Kuhr, Flavor physics at the Tevatron, Springer Tracts Mod.Phys. 249 (2013) 1–161

    work page 2013

  6. [4]

    Aaij et al., Implications of LHCb measurements and future prospects , Eur

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Implications of LHCb measurements and future prospects , Eur . Phys. J. C73 (2013), no. 4 2373, [ arXiv:1208.3355]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [5]

    Altmannshofer et al., The Belle II Physics Book , PTEP 2019 (2019), no

    Belle-II Collaboration, W. Altmannshofer et al., The Belle II Physics Book , PTEP 2019 (2019), no. 12 123C01, [ arXiv:1808.10567]. [Erratum: PTEP 2020, 029201 (2020)]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [6]

    Virto, Charmless Non-Leptonic Multi-Body B decays , PoS FPCP2016 (2017) 007, [arXiv:1609.07430]

    J. Virto, Charmless Non-Leptonic Multi-Body B decays , PoS FPCP2016 (2017) 007, [arXiv:1609.07430]. 15

    arXiv 2017

Show all 80 references
  1. [7]

    Liu, Z.-T

    W.-F. Liu, Z.-T. Zou, and Y . Li, Charmless Quasi-Two-Body B Decays in Perturbative QCD Approach: Taking B → K(R → K+K−) as Examples, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2022 (2022) 5287693, [arXiv:2112.00315]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [8]

    R. H. Dalitz, On the analysis of tau-meson data and the nature of the tau-me son, Phil. Mag. Ser . 744 (1953) 1068–1080

    1953

  3. [9]

    El-Bennich, A

    B. El-Bennich, A. Furman, R. Kaminski, L. Lesniak, B. Loi seau, and B. Moussallam, CP violation and kaon-pion interactions in B → Kπ +π − decays, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 094005, [arXiv:0902.3645]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 83, 039903 (2011)]

    2009 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Kr¨ ankl, T

    S. Kr¨ ankl, T. Mannel, and J. Virto, Three-body non-leptonic B decays and QCD factorization , Nucl. Phys. B 899 (2015) 247–264, [ arXiv:1505.04111]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Klein, T

    R. Klein, T. Mannel, J. Virto, and K. K. V os, CP Violation in Multibody B Decays from QCD Factorization, JHEP 10 (2017) 117, [ arXiv:1708.02047]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Cheng, C.-K

    H.-Y . Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and Z.-Q. Zhang, Direct CP Violation in Charmless Three-body Decays of B Mesons , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 9 094015, [ arXiv:1607.08313]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Cheng and C.-K

    H.-Y . Cheng and C.-K. Chua, Charmless three-body decays of B s mesons, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 7 074025, [ arXiv:1401.5514]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Li, Comprehensive study of B0 → K0(K0)K∓π ± decays in the factorization approach , Phys

    Y . Li, Comprehensive study of B0 → K0(K0)K∓π ± decays in the factorization approach , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 9 094007, [ arXiv:1402.6052]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Lesniak and P

    L. Lesniak and P . Zenczykowski, Dalitz-plot analysis of B ± → K±K+K− decays, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 3 033001, [ arXiv:2405.18192]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Wang and H.-n

    W.-F. Wang and H.-n. Li, Quasi-two-body decays B → Kρ → Kππ in perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Lett. B 763 (2016) 29–39, [ arXiv:1609.04614]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Li, A.-J

    Y . Li, A.-J. Ma, W.-F. Wang, and Z.-J. Xiao, Quasi-two-body decays B (s) → Pρ → Pππ in perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 5 056008, [ arXiv:1612.05934]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Z. Rui, Y . Li, and W.-F. Wang, The S-wave resonance contributions in the B 0 s decays into ψ (2S,3S) plus pion pair , Eur . Phys. J. C77 (2017), no. 3 199, [ arXiv:1701.02941]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Z.-T. Zou, Y . Li, and X. Liu, Branching fractions and CP asymmetries of the quasi-two-bo dy decays in B s → K0(K0)K±π ∓ within PQCD approach, Eur . Phys. J. C80 (2020), no. 6 517, [arXiv:2005.02097]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Z.-T. Zou, L. Y ang, Y . Li, and X. Liu, Study of Quasi-two-body B(s) → φ ( f0(980)/ f2(1270) →)ππ Decays in Perturbative QCD Approach, Eur . Phys. J. C81 (2021), no. 1 91, [ arXiv:2011.07676]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Zhang, X.-H

    Z.-H. Zhang, X.-H. Guo, and Y .-D. Y ang, CP violation in B ± → π ±π +π − in the region with low invariant mass of one π +π − pair, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 7 076007, [arXiv:1303.3676]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [23]

    El-Bennich, A

    B. El-Bennich, A. Furman, R. Kaminski, L. Lesniak, and B . Loiseau, Interference between f0(980) and ρ (770)0 resonances in B → π +π −K decays, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 114009, [hep-ph/0608205]

    2006 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Hu and Z.-H

    R. Hu and Z.-H. Zhang, Data-based analysis of the forward-backward asymmetry in B± → K±K∓K±, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 9 093007, [ arXiv:2201.07456]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    L. M. Abreu, N. Ikeno, and E. Oset, Role of f 0(980) and a0(980) in the B − → π −K+K− and B− → π −K0 ¯K0 reactions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 1 016007, [ arXiv:2305.02848]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 3 030001

    2024

  20. [27]

    N. N. Achasov, Fate of Light Scalar Mesons , Phys. Part. Nucl. 51 (2020), no. 4 632–639, [arXiv:2002.01354]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    F. E. Close and N. A. Tornqvist, Scalar mesons above and below 1-GeV , J. Phys. G 28 (2002) R249–R267, [ hep-ph/0204205]

    2002 arXiv

  22. [29]

    J. D. Weinstein and N. Isgur, K anti-K Molecules , Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2236

    1990

  23. [30]

    N. N. Achasov, J. V . Bennett, A. V . Kiselev, E. A. Kozyrev, and G. N. Shestakov, Evidence of the four-quark nature of f 0(980) and f 0(500), Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 1 014010, [arXiv:2009.04191]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Aubert et al., Dalitz-plot analysis of the decays B ± → K±π ∓π ±, Phys

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Dalitz-plot analysis of the decays B ± → K±π ∓π ±, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 072003, [ hep-ex/0507004]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 74, 099903 (2006)]. 17

    2005 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Aubert et al., Observation of the Decay B + → K+K−π +, Phys

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Observation of the Decay B + → K+K−π +, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 221801, [arXiv:0708.0376]

    2007 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Aubert et al., Evidence for Direct CP Violation from Dalitz-plot analysis of B ± → K±π ∓π ±, Phys

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Evidence for Direct CP Violation from Dalitz-plot analysis of B ± → K±π ∓π ±, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 012004, [arXiv:0803.4451]

    2008 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Aubert et al., Time-dependent amplitude analysis of B 0 → K0 s π +π −, Phys

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Time-dependent amplitude analysis of B 0 → K0 s π +π −, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 112001, [ arXiv:0905.3615]

    2009 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Aubert et al., Dalitz Plot Analysis of B ± → π ±π ±π ∓ Decays, Phys

    BaBar Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Dalitz Plot Analysis of B ± → π ±π ±π ∓ Decays, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 072006, [arXiv:0902.2051]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [36]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P . Lees et al., Amplitude analysis and measurement of the time-dependent CP asymmetry of B 0 → K0 S K0 S K0 S decays, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 054023, [arXiv:1111.3636]

    2012 arXiv

  30. [37]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P . Lees et al., Amplitude Analysis of B 0 → K+π −π 0 and Evidence of Direct CP Violation in B → K∗π decays, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 112010, [arXiv:1105.0125]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [38]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P . Lees et al., Study of CP violation in Dalitz-plot analyses of B0 → K+K−K0 s ,B+ → K+K−K+, and B + → K0 s K0 s K+, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 112010, [arXiv:1201.5897]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Garmash et al., Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmless decays B+ → K+π +π − and B+ → K+K+K− , Phys

    Belle Collaboration, A. Garmash et al., Dalitz analysis of the three-body charmless decays B+ → K+π +π − and B+ → K+K+K− , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 092003, [hep-ex/0412066]

    2005 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Garmash et al., Evidence for large direct CP violation in B± → ρ (770)0K± from analysis of the three-body charmless B ± → K±π ±π ∓ decay, Phys

    Belle Collaboration, A. Garmash et al., Evidence for large direct CP violation in B± → ρ (770)0K± from analysis of the three-body charmless B ± → K±π ±π ∓ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 251803, [hep-ex/0512066]

    2006 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Garmash et al., Dalitz Analysis of Three-body Charmless B0 → K0π +π − Decay, Phys

    Belle Collaboration, A. Garmash et al., Dalitz Analysis of Three-body Charmless B0 → K0π +π − Decay, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 012006, [hep-ex/0610081]

    2007 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Dalseno et al., Time-dependent Dalitz Plot Measurement of CP Parameters in B0 → K0 S π +π − Decays, Phys

    Belle Collaboration, J. Dalseno et al., Time-dependent Dalitz Plot Measurement of CP Parameters in B0 → K0 S π +π − Decays, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 072004, [arXiv:0811.3665]

    2009 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Nakahama et al., Measurement of CP violating asymmetries in B0 → K+K−K0 S decays with a time-dependent Dalitz approach , Phys

    Belle Collaboration, Y . Nakahama et al., Measurement of CP violating asymmetries in B0 → K+K−K0 S decays with a time-dependent Dalitz approach , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 073011, [arXiv:1007.3848]. 18

    2010 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Belle Collaboration, C. L. Hsu et al., Measurement of branching fraction and direct CP asymmetry in charmless B + → K+K−π + decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 3 031101, [arXiv:1705.02640]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Aaij et al., Analysis of the resonant components in ¯B0 → J/ψπ +π −, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Analysis of the resonant components in ¯B0 → J/ψπ +π −, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 5 052001, [ arXiv:1301.5347]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Aaij et al., Measurement of CP violation in the phase space of B± → K+K−π ± and B± → π +π −π ± decays, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of CP violation in the phase space of B± → K+K−π ± and B± → π +π −π ± decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014), no. 1 011801, [arXiv:1310.4740]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Aaij et al., Measurement of CP violation in the phase space of B± → K±π +π − and B± → K±K+K− decays, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of CP violation in the phase space of B± → K±π +π − and B± → K±K+K− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 101801, [arXiv:1306.1246]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Aaij et al., Measurements of CP violation in the three-body phase space of charmless B ± decays, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurements of CP violation in the three-body phase space of charmless B ± decays, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 11 112004, [ arXiv:1408.5373]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Aaij et al., Observation of Several Sources of CP Violation in B+ → π +π +π − Decays, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of Several Sources of CP Violation in B+ → π +π +π − Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 3 031801, [ arXiv:1909.05211]

    2020

  43. [50]

    Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of the B + → π +π +π − decay, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of the B + → π +π +π − decay, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 1 012006, [ arXiv:1909.05212]

    2020

  44. [51]

    Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of B 0 s → K0 S K± π ∓ decays, JHEP 06 (2019) 114, [ arXiv:1902.07955]

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of B 0 s → K0 S K± π ∓ decays, JHEP 06 (2019) 114, [ arXiv:1902.07955]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of B ± → π ±K+K− decays, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of B ± → π ±K+K− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019), no. 23 231802, [ arXiv:1905.09244]

    2019

  46. [53]

    Aaij et al., Direct CP violation in charmless three-body decays of B ± mesons, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Direct CP violation in charmless three-body decays of B ± mesons, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 1 012008, [ arXiv:2206.07622]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Herndon, P

    D. Herndon, P . Soding, and R. J. Cashmore, A GENERALIZED ISOBAR MODEL FORMALISM, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 3165

    1975

  48. [55]

    S. U. Chung, J. Brose, R. Hackmann, E. Klempt, S. Spanier , and C. Strassburger, Partial wave analysis in K matrix formalism , Annalen Phys. 4 (1995) 404–430. 19

    1995

  49. [56]

    Buchalla, A

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 1125–1144, [ hep-ph/9512380]

    1996 arXiv

  50. [57]

    C.-D. Lu, K. Ukai, and M.-Z. Y ang, Branching ratio and CP violation of B → ππ decays in perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 074009, [hep-ph/0004213]

    2001 arXiv

  51. [58]

    X.-Q. Y u, Y . Li, and C.-D. Lu, Branching ratio and CP violation of B s → π K decays in the perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 074026, [hep-ph/0501152]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 72, 119903 (2005)]

    2005 arXiv

  52. [59]

    A. Ali, G. Kramer, Y . Li, C.-D. Lu, Y .-L. Shen, W. Wang, and Y .-M. Wang,Charmless non-leptonic Bs decays to PP, PV and VV final states in the pQCD approach , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 074018, [hep-ph/0703162]

    2007 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Z.-T. Zou, A. Ali, C.-D. Lu, X. Liu, and Y . Li, Improved Estimates of The B (s) → VV Decays in Perturbative QCD Approach, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 054033, [arXiv:1501.00784]

    2015 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Li, D.-C

    Y . Li, D.-C. Y an, Z. Rui, and Z.-J. Xiao, S, P and D-wave resonance contributions to B(s) → η c(1S,2S)Kπ decays in the perturbative QCD approach , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 1 016015, [arXiv:1911.09348]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Z. Rui, Y . Li, and H. Li, Studies of the resonance components in the B s decays into charmonia plus kaon pair , Eur . Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 9 792, [ arXiv:1907.04128]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Wang, H.-n

    W.-F. Wang, H.-n. Li, W. Wang, and C.-D. L¨ u,S-wave resonance contributions to the B0 (s) → J/ ψπ +π − and Bs → π +π −µ +µ − decays, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 9 094024, [arXiv:1502.05483]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Xing and Z.-P

    Y . Xing and Z.-P . Xing, S-wave contributions in ¯B0 s → (D0, ¯D0) π +π − within perturbative QCD approach, Chin. Phys. C 43 (2019), no. 7 073103, [ arXiv:1903.04255]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Li, D.-C

    Y . Li, D.-C. Y an, Z. Rui, L. Liu, Y .-T. Zhang, and Z.-J. Xiao, Resonant contributions to three-body B(s) → [D(∗), ¯D(∗)]K+K− decays in the perturbative QCD approach , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 5 056017, [ arXiv:2007.13629]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Tanabashi et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, M. Tanabashi et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 3 030001. 20

    2018

  60. [68]

    Alston-Garnjost, A

    M. Alston-Garnjost, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, S. M. Flatte , J. H. Friedman, G. R. Lynch, S. D. Protopopescu, M. S. Rabin, and F. T. Solmitz, OBSERVATION OF AN ANOMALY IN THE π +π − SYSTEM AT 980-MeV, Phys. Lett. B 36 (1971) 152–156

    1971

  61. [69]

    S. M. Flatte, M. Alston-Garnjost, A. Barbaro-Galtieri , J. H. Friedman, G. R. Lynch, S. D. Protopopescu, M. S. Rabin, and F. T. Solmitz, ANALYSIS OF THE OBSERVED ANOMALY IN ππ s WA VE SCATTERING NEAR K anti-K THRESHOLD, Phys. Lett. B 38 (1972) 232–236

    1972

  62. [70]

    S. M. Flatte, Coupled - Channel Analysis of the πη and K ¯K Systems Near K ¯K Threshold, Phys. Lett. B 63 (1976) 224–227

    1976

  63. [71]

    D. V . Bugg, Re-analysis of data on a 0(1450) and a0(980), Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 074023, [arXiv:0808.2706]

    2008 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Aaij et al., Measurement of resonant and CP components in ¯B0 s → J/ ψπ +π − decays, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of resonant and CP components in ¯B0 s → J/ ψπ +π − decays, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 9 092006, [ arXiv:1402.6248]

    2014 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Cheng, C.-K

    H.-Y . Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and K.-C. Y ang, Charmless hadronic B decays involving scalar mesons: Implications to the nature of light scalar mesons , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 014017, [hep-ph/0508104]

    2006 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Fleischer, R

    R. Fleischer, R. Knegjens, and G. Ricciardi, Anatomy of B 0 s,d → J/ ψ f0(980), Eur . Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1832, [ arXiv:1109.1112]

    2011 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Cheng, C.-K

    H.-Y . Cheng, C.-K. Chua, K.-C. Y ang, and Z.-Q. Zhang, Revisiting charmless hadronic B decays to scalar mesons , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 11 114001, [ arXiv:1303.4403]

    2013 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, R. L. Workman et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01

    2022

  69. [77]

    Wang, Y .-L

    W. Wang, Y .-L. Shen, Y . Li, and C.-D. Lu, Study of scalar mesons f 0(980) and f 0(1500) from B → f0(980)K and B → f0(980)K Decays, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 114010, [hep-ph/0609082]

    2006 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Zhang and Z.-J

    Z.-Q. Zhang and Z.-J. Xiao, B → f0(980)(π ,η (′)) Decays in the PQCD Approach , Chin. Phys. C 33 (2009) 508–515, [ arXiv:0812.2314]

    2009 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Ablikim et al., Partial wave analysis of χ c0 → π +π −K+K−, Phys

    BES Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., Partial wave analysis of χ c0 → π +π −K+K−, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 092002, [hep-ex/0508050]. 21

    2005 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Cheng, C.-K

    H.-Y . Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and A. Soni, Charmless three-body decays of B mesons , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 094006, [arXiv:0704.1049]. 22

    2007 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.