Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 95 references

Holographic Time Crystals vs Penrose

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spherically symmetric holographic time crystals can only exist if the positive mass theorem fails.

desk verdict A careful, well-scoped numerical study that makes a strong case for PI-iff-PMT in spherical symmetry, with one honestly flagged but load-bearing assumption that keeps the central no-go for time crystals short of a theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01723 v1 pith:Z4HPNR5M submitted 2025-02-03 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qc

{AA}smund Folkestad This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechgr-qc MSC 83C5783C0583C4083E30 PACS 04.70.-s11.25.Tq
keywords timecrystalsholographyPenroseinequalitypositivemasstheoremdesignergravityAdS/CFTcorrespondenceblackholescalarhairlarge-Nlimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Thermal time crystals—states that keep oscillating forever instead of settling down—are usually forbidden in infinite volume, but the large-$N$ limit of holographic theories may evade that no-go. This paper connects such hypothetical states to black holes whose exteriors never become stationary, and shows that any holographic microcanonical time crystal with entropy of order $1/G_N$ would violate the AdS Penrose inequality, a bound relating horizon area to black hole mass. Restricting to spherical symmetry and the most general conformally invariant scalar boundary conditions, the paper derives and solves the equations for maximally Penrose-violating initial data and finds strong evidence that the Penrose inequality holds precisely when the positive mass theorem holds. If correct, electrically neutral, non-rotating holographic CFT$_3$ time crystals cannot exist; only states with angular momentum (or charged theories) remain possible candidates. Along the way it finds neutral hairy black holes in a consistent M-theory truncation with a positive mass theorem, and concludes that the Penrose inequality currently adds no new Swampland constraint beyond energy boundedness.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the AdS Penrose inequality $A[\sigma] \le A_{\mathrm{stationary}}(M,J)$, which bounds the area of an outermost marginally trapped surface by the most entropic stationary black hole with the same charges; its derivation assumes the spacetime eventually settles down, so an eternal oscillation is exactly the failure mode. On the constructive side, the argument runs through the Hamiltonian constraint for time-symmetric initial data in 'designer gravity'—scalar field theories with boundary condition $\beta = f\,\mathrm{sign}(\alpha)|\alpha|^{\Delta_+/\Delta_-}$ that preserves boundary conformal invariance—reduced to an ODE system (for $\phi$, $H$, $\Gamma$) whose solutions are stationary points of the mass at fixed horizon radius, plus the superpotential criterion $V(\phi)=2P'(\phi)^2-3P(\phi)^2$ that supplies the positive mass theorem. The numerical solution maps initial scalar values to boundary data $(\alpha,\beta)$ and to the mass, and compares the resulting area ratio to Schwarzschild-AdS.

What would settle it

Find a time-symmetric, spherically symmetric initial dataset in a designer-gravity theory with a proven superpotential (for example potential (4.3) with $f > -s_c$, or (4.4) with $f > -0.69$) whose apparent-horizon area exceeds $A_{\mathrm{Schwarzschild-AdS}}(M)$; the ODE system derived here would then need to produce such a solution, and its existence would break the claimed PI-iff-PMT equivalence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in four-dimensional AdS Einstein-scalar gravity with conformally invariant boundary conditions, spherical symmetry makes the Penrose inequality equivalent to the positive mass theorem: a violation of $A[\sigma] \le A_{\mathrm{stationary}}(M,J)$ exists only in theories whose Hamiltonian is unbounded below. The evidence comes from numerically solving the ODE system for initial data of minimal mass at fixed apparent-horizon area; crossing the boundary where a superpotential exists, which is the known sufficient condition for a positive mass theorem, removes all Penrose-violating solutions. Since a holographic time crystal with $O(1/G_N)$ entropy would be an ensemble-dominating, eternally oscillating black hole and would thereby violate the Penrose inequality, the equivalence rules out such time crystals in the neutral, spherically symmetric sector. The paper also reports the first neutral hairy black holes in a theory with a positive mass theorem and conformal boundary conditions, and shows that previously claimed Penrose violations all sit in theories with lower-unbounded energy.

Load-bearing premise

The no-go for spherical time crystals assumes that the least-mass initial data at fixed horizon area can be chosen on a moment of time symmetry; if the true minimizer requires extrinsic curvature, the search would miss it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Electrically neutral holographic CFT$_3$ time crystals, if they exist in the large-$N$ limit, must have non-zero angular momentum.
  • In spherical symmetry, the Penrose inequality and the positive mass theorem stand or fall together: a PI violation is a signature of lower-unbounded energy, not of a new phase of matter.
  • The no-hair conjecture of [21] is false: neutral hairy black holes exist in a consistent M-theory truncation with a proven positive mass theorem and conformally invariant boundary conditions.
  • The Penrose inequality currently provides no Swampland constraint beyond the requirement that the Hamiltonian be bounded below.
  • A stable eternally oscillating endpoint of the slowly rotating Kerr-AdS$_4$ instability, as suggested by [19], would be a genuine candidate holographic time crystal and would violate the PI.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the PI-iff-PMT equivalence extends beyond spherical symmetry, then any future PI-violating solution in a theory with a superpotential would be the discovery that matters; violations in unbounded-energy theories should not be read as evidence against cosmic censorship.
  • Editorial inference: the time-symmetry assumption used for the numerical search is testable: constructing non-time-symmetric initial data with extrinsic-curvature contributions in a PMT theory and checking the area ratio would either close the loophole or reveal the first counterexample.
  • Editorial inference: the newly found hairy black holes near $\Delta_- = 1$ may have holographic signatures in the canonical ensemble or at finite $N$; computing their free energy relative to Schwarzschild-AdS would show whether they affect phase structure away from strict large $N$.
  • Editorial inference: the same variational strategy—minimize mass at fixed horizon area—could be adapted to charged scalars or rotating initial data, where the angular-momentum loophole would be tested directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that recent numerical evidence for a non-linear instability of slowly rotating Kerr-AdS4 provides candidate holographic large-N thermal time crystals, and then shows that microcanonical holographic time crystals with entropy of order 1/G_N would imply violations of the AdS Penrose inequality (PI). The bulk of the paper is a numerical study of the spherically symmetric PI in Einstein-scalar gravity with designer boundary conditions. The author derives an ODE system for mass-minimizing time-symmetric initial data at fixed apparent-horizon area, solves it across several scaling dimensions Δ− and potentials, and extracts the critical superpotential parameter s_c by two independent methods. The main reported finding is strong evidence that, in spherical symmetry, the PI holds if and only if a positive mass theorem (PMT) holds, i.e., if and only if the Hamiltonian is bounded below; this would exclude neutral, non-rotating holographic CFT3 time crystals. The paper also constructs neutral hairy black holes in a consistent truncation of M-theory with conformally invariant boundary conditions and a PMT, thereby providing a counterexample to a no-hair conjecture, and corrects earlier claims by the author that the PI gave a non-trivial Swampland constraint.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper settles an important question: the spherically symmetric AdS Penrose inequality provides no constraint beyond the positive mass theorem, and neutral spherical holographic time crystals are impossible. The paper is unusually honest about its limitations: it explicitly identifies the time-symmetry assumption in Sec. 3.3 as non-rigorous, flags the numerical difficulties in Sec. 4.6, and corrects the author's previous publication [22]. The numerical work is extensive, covering four distinct ranges of Δ−, multiple potentials, several horizon radii, and two independent determinations of s_c, which is a genuine strength. The counterexample to the no-hair conjecture of [21], if sound, is independently valuable. However, because the central no-go conclusion depends on an unproven assumption and the numerical evidence is weakest precisely in the most delicate regime, the result should be regarded as a conditional, numerically supported conjecture rather than an established theorem.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3] The time-symmetry assumption is load-bearing for the central claim. The ODE system (3.26)-(3.28) is derived only for initial data with vanishing extrinsic curvature, and the justification for restricting to such data is the statement that it is 'reasonable' and that the opposite would require the absence of a maximal volume slice anchored at σ and the conformal boundary, 'which would be very surprising.' This is a heuristic, not a proof. Since the claimed no-go for spherical time crystals requires ruling out all PI-violating initial data in PMT-respecting theories, the possibility remains that non-time-symmetric data with non-zero trace-free extrinsic curvature violate the PI while the Hamiltonian is bounded below. The paper's own Discussion lists removal of the time-symmetry assumption as future work, but this is not a peripheral caveat: it is the gap between a numerical search over a restricted class of initial data and the 'PI iff PMT' statement in Sec. 4 and the Abstract. The conclusion should be explicitly conditioned on this assumption, or the assumption should be replaced by a derivation.
  2. [Sec. 4.6 and App. A.4] The numerical evidence in the range Δ− ∈ (1/2, 3/5) is not robust enough to support the 'iff' claim. The paper states that estimates of β stabilize only for r ≳ 10^5, while the estimate of M0 becomes noisy above r ∼ 4×10^4, so rmax ≈ 4×10^4 is used as a compromise. It further admits that 'relatively small changes to sc or M0 in our results would produce a violation of the PI in the PMT regime.' This means that the regime where the falloffs are slowest is exactly the regime where the evidence for the absence of PI violations is weakest. Given that the central conclusion is an extrapolation over all Δ− ∈ (1/2, 3/2), the paper should either improve the numerics in this range or explicitly limit the claimed evidence to the more robust ranges.
  3. [Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 4.5] The phrase 'PMT holds' is used in a way that conflates a proven theorem with the conjectured existence of a superpotential. In Sec. 3.2 the existence of P−(ϕ;s) is described as a sufficient condition for a lower bound on the Hamiltonian, with necessity only suggested, and in Sec. 4.5 the paper notes that for Δ− ∈ (3/5, 3/4) a PMT has been proven only for f ≥ 0, not for f ≥ −s_c. Thus the comparison 'PI holds iff PMT holds' is really 'PI violations are found only when the Hamiltonian is unbounded below according to the superpotential criterion,' with the converse direction relying on an unproven equivalence. This should be stated as a conjecture with a precise characterization of which f and Δ− ranges have a proven PMT, rather than as a definitive equivalence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The mass of the α = 0 solution at r∗ = 1 is given as M = 2.649 in the main text and M = 2.648 in the caption of Fig. 3; please reconcile the rounding.
  2. [Throughout] The typesetting of 'large−N', 'AdS4', and similar expressions is inconsistent (hyphen vs. minus sign, missing spaces); a uniform style would improve readability.
  3. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.24)] The symbol M is used both for the mass functional and for the boundary condition parameter f; consider using a different symbol for one of them to avoid confusion.
  4. [Sec. 4.6 and App. A.4] The sentence about the upper part of the r-range making the M0 determination noisy appears twice; consider placing the full numerical caveat only in the appendix and keeping a brief pointer in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PI check and PMT criterion are computed independently, and the only self-citation is to correct the author's prior work.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (spherically symmetric PI holds iff the PMT holds) is supported by two independently computed objects. The PI is checked by solving the ODE system for mass-minimizing initial data and comparing the apparent-horizon area with the static black hole area at the computed mass. The PMT criterion is determined separately by the existence of a superpotential P, with the critical value sc extracted by two independent methods (direct numerical solution of the superpotential ODE and the soliton method), which agree. The boundary-condition parameter f for each solution is read off from the near-boundary coefficients (α, β) of that same solution, not fitted to the PI outcome; this is a scan over theories, not a prediction forced by construction. The only self-citation to the author's previous work [22] is used to show that earlier PI-violating examples actually lived in theories with lower-unbounded energy, i.e., it is corrected rather than used as load-bearing support. The time-symmetry assumption in Sec. 3.3 is acknowledged as unproven and is a restriction on the class of initial data searched, not an input that is equivalent to the PI-iff-PMT conclusion; the paper explicitly flags removing it as a future direction. No equation is shown to reduce to its own input, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained and no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central 'PI iff PMT' conclusion rests on the time-symmetry assumption, on assumed extensions of known PMT theorems, and on the reliability of numerical extractions of boundary data. Apart from the scanned boundary-condition parameter f and the theory inputs (potential couplings, horizon radius), there are no fitted constants used to produce the result.

free parameters (4)
  • Scalar potential couplings (mu^2, g3, g4, g5) = e.g. mu^2 = -9/16, -35/32, -119/128, -2511/3200, -539/800; g3 = 9 or 0; g4 in [-0.5, 20]
    Chosen by hand to define the theories across the scaling-dimension ranges; they are inputs, not fitted to enforce the PI result.
  • Boundary deformation parameter f = Not fixed a priori; determined by solutions through the map phi0 -> (alpha, beta), scanned over a range of values
    f sets the conformally invariant boundary condition beta = f sign(alpha) |alpha|^(Delta+/Delta-); the PMT/PI comparison is made by scanning f, not by fitting it to a target.
  • Horizon radius r* = 0.1, 1, 10
    Chosen to test whether the results depend on the black hole size; no qualitative dependence was found.
  • Initial scalar value at horizon phi0 = Varies continuously over a finite range depending on the potential
    Parametrizes the family of mass-extremizing initial data; each value gives a different solution and an induced f value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Mass-minimizing initial data for fixed horizon area can be chosen time-symmetric
    Sec 3.3: 'we will make one reasonable assumption: that mass-minimizing initial data can be realized by an initial dataset corresponding to a moment of time-symmetry'. The author notes this is not rigorous and could miss PI-violating data if no maximal volume slice exists.
  • domain assumption The positive mass theorem criterion (existence of superpotential P_-(phi; s) with s <= sc, and f >= -sc) applies in all regimes studied
    Sec 3.2 and 4.5: PMT is proven only under stated conditions (e.g., g3 = g5 = 0 for Delta_- <= 1, f >= 0 when Delta_- < 3/4); the paper assumes the proof generalizes, saying 'It is plausible that their result holds more generally'.
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary: the microcanonical ensemble at fixed (E, J) is dominated by the maximal-HRT-entropy bulk saddle
    Sec 2.1: standard holographic assumption used to identify time crystals with ensemble-dominating time-dependent black holes.
  • domain assumption The Penrose inequality derivation requires WCCC, settling to a stationary black hole, and the area theorem
    Sec 2.2: used to prove that a time crystal dominating the ensemble would violate the PI; these are standard gravitational assumptions cited from [50, 52-54].
  • domain assumption Numerical extraction of alpha, beta, M0, and sc from finite-radius solutions is sufficiently accurate
    Sec A.4: near Delta_- = 0.55, convergence is slow, M0 extraction becomes noisy above r ~ 4e4, and the author states that small changes to sc or M0 could produce a PI violation in the PMT regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic Time Crystals vs Penrose." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z4HPNR5M

@misc{pith2026250201723,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic Time Crystals vs Penrose},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z4HPNR5M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01723}
}
abstract

In the large$-N$ limit, no known no-go theorem rules out thermal time crystals that spontaneously break continuous time-translation, unlike in the large volume limit. If thermal time crystals exist in holographic CFTs, they would correspond to ensemble-dominating black holes with eternally time-varying exterior geometries. We point out that recent work on a conjectured non-linear instability of slowly rotating Kerr-AdS$_4$ produced viable candidates for such states. Then we show that the existence of holographic microcanonical time crystals would imply violations of the AdS Penrose inequality (PI). We proceed to look for violations of the PI in spherical symmetry, working with Einstein-scalar gravity with the most general possible boundary conditions compatible with boundary conformal invariance. We derive a set of ODEs for maximally PI-violating initial data. Solving these numerically, we find strong evidence that in the particular case of spherical symmetry, the PI holds iff the positive mass theorem (PMT) holds. This suggests that holographic CFT$_3$ time crystals can only possibly exist at non-zero angular momentum, at least in the absence of electric charge. We also discover neutral hairy black holes in a consistent truncation of M-theory that has a PMT and boundary conditions respecting conformal invariance, disproving an existing no-hair conjecture. Finally, we show that previous PI-violating solutions by the author all existed in theories where the PMT is violated. Unfortunately, our results imply that there currently are no known examples where the PI functions as a non-trivial Swampland constraint.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01723 by the authors.

Figure 9
Figure 9. 4.5 ∆− ∈ (3/5, 3/4) Now we consider V = −3 − 2511 3200 ϕ 2 + g4ϕ 4 (4.8) giving a theory with a scaling dimension in the middle of the range ( 3 5 , 3 4 ), meaning ∆− = 27 40 = 0.675. A superpotential only exists for g4 ≥ g4∗ ≈ −1. We do not consider a cubic or quintic coupling, since no lower bound on the mass has been proven with a cubic or quintic coupling for this range of dimensions. Strictly speaking, even wit… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    The Penrose Inequality as a Constraint on the Low Energy Limit of Quantum Gravity

    ˚A. Folkestad, Penrose Inequality as a Constraint on the Low Energy Limit of Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 12 121501, [ arXiv:2209.00013]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  2. [21]

    Hertog, Towards a Novel no-hair Theorem for Black Holes , Phys

    T. Hertog, Towards a Novel no-hair Theorem for Black Holes , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 084008, [gr-qc/0608075]

    arXiv 2006

  3. [1]

    Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 160401, [arXiv:1202.2539]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [2]

    Quantum Time Crystals

    P. Bruno, Comment on “Quantum Time Crystals” , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013), no. 11 118901, [arXiv:1210.4128]

    arXiv 2013

  5. [3]

    Wilczek, Wilczek reply:, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Wilczek reply:, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (Mar, 2013) 118902

    2013

  6. [4]

    Li, Z.-X

    T. Li, Z.-X. Gong, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, X. Yin, P. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, and X. Zhang, Space-time crystals of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (Oct, 2012) 163001

    2012

  7. [5]

    space-time crystals of trapped ions

    P. Bruno, Comment on “space-time crystals of trapped ions” , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (Jul, 2013) 029301

    2013

  8. [6]

    Li, Z.-X

    T. Li, Z.-X. Gong, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, X. Yin, P. Zhang, L. M. Duan, and X. Zhang, Reply to comment on ”space-time crystals of trapped ions” , 2013

    2013

Show all 95 references
  1. [7]

    Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem , Phys

    P. Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: A no-go theorem , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (Aug, 2013) 070402. – 33 –

    2013

  2. [8]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Absence of Quantum Time Crystals , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015), no. 25 251603, [ arXiv:1410.2143]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time-translation symmetry , Phys

    K. Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time-translation symmetry , Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015), no. 3 033617, [ arXiv:1410.3638]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [10]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet Time Crystals , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 9 090402

    2016

  5. [11]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Prethermal Phases of Matter Protected by Time-Translation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017), no. 1 011026, [arXiv:1607.05277]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Zhang et al., Observation of a discrete time crystal , Nature 543 (2017) 217–220

    J. Zhang et al., Observation of a discrete time crystal , Nature 543 (2017) 217–220

    2017

  7. [13]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and L. Sondhi, S. Phase Structure of Driven Quantum Systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 25 250401

    2016

  8. [14]

    Choi et al., Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature 543 (2017), no

    S. Choi et al., Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature 543 (2017), no. 7644 221–225

    2017

  9. [15]

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vishwanath, Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (Jan, 2017) 030401

    2017

  10. [16]

    Khemani, R

    V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, A Brief History of Time Crystals , arXiv:1910.10745

    1910 arXiv

  11. [17]

    ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions , Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461

    1974

  12. [18]

    Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv

    J. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231, [ hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Figueras and L

    P. Figueras and L. Rossi, Non-linear instability of slowly rotating Kerr-AdS black holes , arXiv:2311.14167

  14. [20]

    J. P. Gauntlett, J. Sonner, and T. Wiseman, Holographic superconductivity in M-Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 151601, [ arXiv:0907.3796]

    2009 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland , hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland , hep-th/0509212

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland , Nucl. Phys. B766 (2007) 21–33, [ hep-th/0605264]

    2007 arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter , JHEP 04 (2003) 021, [hep-th/0106112]. – 34 –

    2003 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hawking and D

    S. Hawking and D. N. Page, Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space , Commun.Math.Phys. 87 (1983) 577

    1983

  19. [27]

    Marolf, Microcanonical Path Integrals and the Holography of small Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 09 (2018) 114, [ arXiv:1808.00394]

    D. Marolf, Microcanonical Path Integrals and the Holography of small Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 09 (2018) 114, [ arXiv:1808.00394]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    H. K. Kunduri, J. Lucietti, and H. S. Reall, Gravitational perturbations of higher dimensional rotating black holes: Tensor perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 084021, [hep-th/0606076]

    2006 arXiv

  21. [29]

    O. J. C. Dias, G. T. Horowitz, and J. E. Santos, Black holes with only one Killing field , JHEP 07 (2011) 115, [ arXiv:1105.4167]

    2011 arXiv

  22. [30]

    O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, Black holes with a single Killing vector field: black resonators, JHEP 12 (2015) 171, [ arXiv:1505.04793]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ishii and K

    T. Ishii and K. Murata, Black resonators and geons in AdS5 , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 12 125011, [ arXiv:1810.11089]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Ishii, K

    T. Ishii, K. Murata, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, Multioscillating black holes , JHEP 05 (2021) 011, [ arXiv:2101.06325]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ishii, Superradiant instability and black resonators in AdS , SciPost Phys

    T. Ishii, Superradiant instability and black resonators in AdS , SciPost Phys. Proc. 4 (2021) 008

    2021

  26. [34]

    S. W. Hawking and H. S. Reall, Charged and rotating AdS black holes and their CFT duals, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 024014, [ hep-th/9908109]

    2000 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cardoso and O

    V. Cardoso and O. J. C. Dias, Small Kerr-anti-de Sitter black holes are unstable , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 084011, [ hep-th/0405006]

    2004 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cardoso, O

    V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, L. Lehner, and J. E. Santos, Holographic thermalization, quasinormal modes and superradiance in Kerr-AdS , JHEP 04 (2014) 183, [arXiv:1312.5323]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Y. B. Zel’Dovich, Generation of Waves by a Rotating Body , Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 14 (Aug., 1971) 180

    1971

  30. [38]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Amplification of waves reflected from a rotating ”black hole”. , Sov. Phys. JETP 37 (1973), no. 1 28–32

    1973

  31. [39]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Lect. Notes Phys. 906 (2015) pp.1–237, [ arXiv:1501.06570]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb , Nature 238 (1972) 211–212

    1972

  33. [41]

    O. J. C. Dias, G. T. Horowitz, and J. E. Santos, Gravitational Turbulent Instability of Anti-de Sitter Space, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 194002, [ arXiv:1109.1825]. – 35 –

    2012 arXiv

  34. [42]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos, Geons and the instability of anti-de Sitter spacetime , Surveys Diff. Geom. 20 (2015), no. 1 321–335, [ arXiv:1408.5906]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Martinon, G

    G. Martinon, G. Fodor, P. Grandcl´ ement, and P. Forg` acs,Gravitational geons in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes , Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017), no. 12 125012, [arXiv:1701.09100]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    S. R. Green, S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi, and R. M. Wald, Superradiant instabilities of asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016), no. 12 125022, [arXiv:1512.02644]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [45]

    P. M. Chesler and D. A. Lowe, Nonlinear Evolution of the AdS 4 Superradiant Instability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019), no. 18 181101, [ arXiv:1801.09711]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    P. M. Chesler, Hairy black resonators and the AdS4 superradiant instability , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 2 024026, [ arXiv:2109.06901]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    S. Kim, S. Kundu, E. Lee, J. Lee, S. Minwalla, and C. Patel, Grey Galaxies’ as an endpoint of the Kerr-AdS superradiant instability , JHEP 11 (2023) 024, [arXiv:2305.08922]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Holzegel and J

    G. Holzegel and J. Smulevici, Decay properties of Klein-Gordon fields on Kerr-AdS spacetimes, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66 (2013) 1751–1802, [ arXiv:1110.6794]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    G. H. Holzegel and C. M. Warnick, Boundedness and growth for the massive wave equation on asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes , J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), no. 4 2436–2485, [arXiv:1209.3308]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Penrose, Naked Singularities, in Sixth Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics (D

    R. Penrose, Naked Singularities, in Sixth Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics (D. J. Hegyi, ed.), vol. 224 of Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , p. 125, 1973

    1973

  43. [51]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities , Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities , Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (Jan, 1965) 57–59

    1965

  44. [52]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The large scale stucture of space-time . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1973

    1973

  45. [53]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984

    1984

  46. [54]

    S. W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971) 1344–1346

    1971

  47. [55]

    Geroch, Energy extraction*, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 224 (1973), no

    R. Geroch, Energy extraction*, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 224 (1973), no. 1 108–117, [https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb41445.x]

    1973

  48. [56]

    Huisken and T

    G. Huisken and T. Ilmanen, The Inverse Mean Curvature Flow and the Riemannian Penrose Inequality, Journal of Differential Geometry 59 (2001), no. 3 353 – 437. – 36 –

    2001

  49. [57]

    H. L. Bray, Proof of the Riemannian Penrose Conjecture Using the Positive Mass Theorem, arXiv Mathematics e-prints (Nov., 1999) math/9911173, [ math/9911173]

    1999 arXiv

  50. [58]

    H. L. Bray and D. A. Lee, On the Riemannian Penrose inequality in dimensions less than 8 , Duke Math. J. 148 (2009) 81–106, [ arXiv:0705.1128]

    2009 arXiv

  51. [59]

    L. L. de Lima and F. Girao, Positive mass and penrose type inequalities for asymptotically hyperbolic hypersurfaces, 2012

    2012

  52. [60]

    Y. Ge, G. Wang, J. Wu, and C. Xia, A penrose inequality for graphs over kottler space , 2013

    2013

  53. [61]

    Husain and S

    V. Husain and S. Singh, Penrose inequality in anti–de Sitter space , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 10 104055, [ arXiv:1709.02395]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Engelhardt and G

    N. Engelhardt and G. T. Horowitz, Holographic argument for the Penrose inequality in AdS spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 12 126009, [ arXiv:1903.00555]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Schwabl, Statistical Mechanics

    F. Schwabl, Statistical Mechanics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2nd ed. 2006 ed., 2006

    2006

  56. [64]

    Khuri, G

    M. Khuri, G. Weinstein, and S. Yamada, Extensions of the Charged Riemannian Penrose Inequality, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015), no. 3 035019, [ arXiv:1410.5027]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Hertog, G

    T. Hertog, G. T. Horowitz, and K. Maeda, Negative energy density in Calabi-Yau compactifications, JHEP 05 (2003) 060, [ hep-th/0304199]

    2003 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Positive energy in anti-de Sitter backgrounds AND gauged extended supergravity, Phys. Lett. B115 (1982) 197

    1982

  59. [67]

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, Holographic Superconductors, JHEP 12 (2008) 015, [ arXiv:0810.1563]

    2008 arXiv

  60. [68]

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, Building a Holographic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 031601, [ arXiv:0803.3295]

    2008 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Sudarsky and J

    D. Sudarsky and J. A. Gonzalez, On black hole scalar hair in asymptotically anti-de Sitter space-times, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 024038, [ gr-qc/0207069]

    2003 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Torii, K

    T. Torii, K. Maeda, and M. Narita, Scalar hair on the black hole in asymptotically anti–de sitter spacetime , Phys. Rev. D 64 (Jul, 2001) 044007

    2001

  63. [71]

    Martinez, R

    C. Martinez, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Exact black hole solution with a minimally coupled scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 084035, [ hep-th/0406111]

    2004 arXiv

  64. [72]

    K. G. Zloshchastiev, On co-existence of black holes and scalar field , Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 121101, [ hep-th/0408163]

    2005 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Hertog and K

    T. Hertog and K. Maeda, Black holes with scalar hair and asymptotics in N = 8 supergravity, JHEP 07 (2004) 051, [ hep-th/0404261]. – 37 –

    2004 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Henneaux, C

    M. Henneaux, C. Martinez, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Asymptotic behavior and Hamiltonian analysis of anti-de Sitter gravity coupled to scalar fields , Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 824–848, [ hep-th/0603185]

    2007 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Hertog and G

    T. Hertog and G. T. Horowitz, Designer gravity and field theory effective potentials , Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 221301, [ hep-th/0412169]

    2005 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Witten, Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspondence , hep-th/0112258

    E. Witten, Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspondence , hep-th/0112258

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Hertog and S

    T. Hertog and S. Hollands, Stability in designer gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 5323–5342, [hep-th/0508181]

    2005 arXiv

  70. [78]

    A. J. Amsel and D. Marolf, Energy Bounds in Designer Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 064006, [ hep-th/0605101]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 029901 (2007)]

    2006 arXiv

  71. [79]

    A. J. Amsel, T. Hertog, S. Hollands, and D. Marolf, A Tale of two superpotentials: Stability and instability in designer gravity , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 084008, [hep-th/0701038]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 77, 049903 (2008)]

    2007 arXiv

  72. [80]

    A. J. Amsel and M. M. Roberts, Stability in Holographic Theories with Irrelevant Deformations, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 086007, [ arXiv:1211.2840]

    2013 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Witten, A Simple Proof of the Positive Energy Theorem , Commun

    E. Witten, A Simple Proof of the Positive Energy Theorem , Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981) 381

    1981

  74. [82]

    J. A. Nester, A New gravitational energy expression with a simple positivity proof , Phys. Lett. A 83 (1981) 241

    1981

  75. [83]

    Boucher, Positive energy without supersymmetry , Nucl

    W. Boucher, Positive energy without supersymmetry , Nucl. Phys. B242 (1984) 282

    1984

  76. [84]

    P. K. Townsend, Positive Energy and the Scalar Potential in Higher Dimensional (Super)gravity Theories, Phys. Lett. B 148 (1984) 55–59

    1984

  77. [85]

    Papadimitriou, Non-Supersymmetric Membrane Flows from Fake Supergravity and Multi-Trace Deformations, JHEP 02 (2007) 008, [ hep-th/0606038]

    I. Papadimitriou, Non-Supersymmetric Membrane Flows from Fake Supergravity and Multi-Trace Deformations, JHEP 02 (2007) 008, [ hep-th/0606038]

    2007 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Papadimitriou, Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT , JHEP 05 (2007) 075, [ hep-th/0703152]

    I. Papadimitriou, Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT , JHEP 05 (2007) 075, [ hep-th/0703152]

    2007 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Faulkner, G

    T. Faulkner, G. T. Horowitz, and M. M. Roberts, New stability results for Einstein scalar gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 205007, [ arXiv:1006.2387]

    2010 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Engelhardt and ˚A

    N. Engelhardt and ˚A. Folkestad, General bounds on holographic complexity , JHEP 01 (2022) 040, [ arXiv:2109.06883]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Hertog, G

    T. Hertog, G. T. Horowitz, and K. Maeda, Generic cosmic censorship violation in anti-de Sitter space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 131101, [ gr-qc/0307102]

    2004 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Cvetic, M

    M. Cvetic, M. J. Duff, P. Hoxha, J. T. Liu, H. Lu, J. X. Lu, R. Martinez-Acosta, C. N. – 38 – Pope, H. Sati, and T. A. Tran, Embedding AdS black holes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 558 (1999) 96–126, [ hep-th/9903214]

    1999 arXiv

  83. [91]

    D’Hoker, D

    E. D’Hoker, D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis, and L. Rastelli, Extremal correlators in the AdS / CFT correspondence , hep-th/9908160

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Castro and P

    A. Castro and P. J. Martinez, Revisiting extremal couplings in AdS/CFT , JHEP 12 (2024) 157, [ arXiv:2409.15410]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    A. J. Amsel and M. M. Roberts, Stability in Einstein-Scalar Gravity with a Logarithmic Branch, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 106011, [ arXiv:1112.3964]

    2012 arXiv

  86. [94]

    DeWolfe, D

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, and A. Karch, Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 046008, [ hep-th/9909134]

    2000 arXiv

  87. [95]

    D. Z. Freedman, C. Nunez, M. Schnabl, and K. Skenderis, Fake supergravity and domain wall stability , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 104027, [ hep-th/0312055]. – 39 –

    2004 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.