Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

JWST sighting of decameter main-belt asteroids and view on meteorite sources

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports serendipitous JWST/MIRI detections of the smallest main-belt asteroids ever observed—down to about 10 m—and derives a size-frequency distribution with a break near 100 m, indicating a collisional cascade.

desk verdict A genuinely new decameter main-belt sample with a plausible SFD break, but the thermal-model and slope-inconsistency issues need fixing before the quantitative slopes are cited. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01744 v1 pith:KBQC7KKQ submitted 2025-02-03 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Artem Y. Burdanov , Julien de Wit , Miroslav Brož , Thomas G. Müller , Tobias Hoffmann , Marin Ferrais , Marco Micheli , Emmanuel Jehin
show 14 more authors
Daniel Parrott Samantha N. Hasler Richard P. Binzel Elsa Ducrot Laura Kreidberg Michaël Gillon Thomas P. Greene Will M. Grundy Theodore Kareta Pierre-Olivier Lagage Nicholas Moskovitz Audrey Thirouin Cristina A. Thomas Sebastian Zieba
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords main-beltasteroidsdecametersize-frequencydistributionsynthetictrackingJWSTMIRIthermalradiometrycollisionalcascademeteoritesourceregions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports 139 previously unknown main-belt asteroids, roughly 10 to 500 m across, caught as they crossed the JWST/MIRI field during long stares at the TRAPPIST-1 star. Their sizes come from 15-micron thermal fluxes, with distances estimated by matching each object's motion to known asteroids near the same pointing. The debiased size-frequency distribution shows a break near 100 m, with steeper slopes below the break and shallower slopes above it, which the authors interpret as a collisionally evolved population. If correct, this gives the first direct look at the decameter main belt and connects asteroid families to the source regions of meteorites.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is synthetic tracking: a blind 'shift-and-stack' search over many velocity vectors that co-adds exposures to reveal moving objects too faint for single frames. Distances are then assigned by a population-based method that compares each unknown asteroid's speed and position angle with known asteroids predicted near the pointing, yielding observer-target distances with typical uncertainties of 0.2-0.3 au. Sizes come from the Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM), a standard radiometric model treating asteroids as non-rotating smooth spheres in instantaneous thermal equilibrium, with the infrared beaming parameter $\eta$ set by a published phase-angle relation. The paper also uses Monte Carlo resampling of diameter uncertainties to debias the size-frequency distribution and to map apparent slopes onto true slopes.

What would settle it

Recover orbits or obtain a second MIRI thermal band for the same 139 objects: if the fast-rotating thermal model is correct, a 1 microjansky source at 2.75 au from the Sun is about 55 m across rather than the 32 m of the standard model, moving the ~100 m break and changing the reported slopes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims the first direct detections of decameter-scale main-belt asteroids, enabled by synthetic tracking of undithered JWST/MIRI exposures at 15 microns. Despite observing arcs of only 30 minutes to 8 hours, the authors constrain observer-target distances by using the speed and position angle of each unknown object relative to ensembles of known asteroids near the field, then convert 15-micron fluxes into diameters with a standard radiometric model. The resulting debiased cumulative size-frequency distribution, $N(>D)=C D^q$, has a break near $\sim 100$ m: reported slopes are roughly $q \approx -2.25$ to $-2.66$ below 100 m and $q \approx -0.97$ to $-0.98$ above it. They interpret the steep sub-100 m branch as the signature of collisional fragmentation in the strength regime, and associate the sampled objects with the Nysa, Polana, and Massalia families. The paper further argues that JWST long stares near the ecliptic will serendipitously detect thousands of decameter asteroids and probe meteorite source regions directly.

Load-bearing premise

The sizes rest on a thermal model calibrated mainly for larger asteroids; if tens-of-meter bodies rotate fast or have different infrared beaming, the same measured flux yields diameters up to roughly 50% larger, which would shift the break and slopes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the debiased slope below 100 m is as steep as reported, the main belt contains far more tens-of-meter bodies than earlier extrapolations suggested, implying a higher decameter impactor flux into near-Earth space.
  • The break near 100 m matches the size where asteroids are thought to be weakest, supporting the idea that this population is shaped by a collisional cascade rather than by primordial formation.
  • The sampled objects are consistent with the Nysa, Polana, and Massalia families; if confirmed, JWST can directly probe the family source regions of meteorite samples.
  • With roughly 500 hours of planned MIRI stares at exoplanet host stars, many within 20 degrees of the ecliptic, JWST should detect hundreds to thousands of additional decameter asteroids.
  • JWST infrared rotation curves of roughly 300 m and larger asteroids can constrain family history, rotationally evolved structures, and interior properties during close encounters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If decameter asteroids rotate as fast as small-body surveys suggest, the fast-rotating thermal model would make the true diameters systematically larger than the paper's default NEATM values, possibly shifting the 100 m break upward and steepening the sub-100 m slope.
  • The near-ecliptic pointing geometry preferentially sampled low-inclination families, so the claimed family associations and the derived size-frequency distribution may not represent the full main-belt population away from the ecliptic.
  • Multi-visit JWST observations or ground-based recovery of the same objects could turn the population-based distance estimates into real orbits, providing a direct test of the method on objects as small as tens of meters.
  • Running the same synthetic-tracking search on other undithered MIRI long stares, including archival exoplanet observations, would test the paper's prediction of thousands of serendipitous decameter detections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the serendipitous detection of 139 previously unknown main-belt asteroids (with 8 known asteroids also recovered) in long-stare JWST/MIRI 15 micron observations of TRAPPIST-1, using GPU-based synthetic tracking. For the unknown objects, distances are assigned through a population-based prior using known asteroids in the same speed/position-angle space, and sizes are derived with the NEATM radiometric model. The debiased size-frequency distribution is claimed to exhibit a break near 100 m, with steep cumulative slopes at smaller sizes and shallow slopes at larger sizes, and the authors interpret this as evidence of a collisionally evolved population and link the detections to the Nysa, Polana, and Massalia families.

Significance. If correct, this is the first direct observational census of decameter main-belt asteroids, a size range that has been essentially unconstrained by previous surveys and that is critical for understanding the collisional cascade, meteorite delivery, and the impact hazard from decameter NEOs. The paper's methodology is a strength: the detections are supported by injection-recovery tests with a reported completeness threshold at about 0.5 microJy, the photometry is calibrated against the stable TRAPPIST-1 flux, and the uncertainty propagation to the SFD uses Monte Carlo methods rather than a single best-fit curve. The population-based distance estimation is validated in a blind test on eight known asteroids, and the authors explicitly discuss the information content and sampling biases of their SFD. However, the quantitative conclusions—the location of the break and the debiased slopes—are not yet robust because the dominant thermal-model systematic at decameter sizes is not propagated into the SFD, and because the reported slope values are internally inconsistent across the abstract, main text, and figure captions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'Size and albedo determination'] The paper states that for very small asteroids the NEATM model is 'not well tested' and that a Fast-Rotating Model (FRM) is more appropriate for small, rapidly rotating objects, yet the size ranges derived in steps 1–4 of the unknown-object procedure vary only albedo and the beaming parameter eta by ±10%, not the choice of thermal model. The text quotes that for a 1 microJy source at 2.75 au, NEATM gives D = 32 m while FRM gives D = 55 m, a ~70% difference, and states that differences remain below 50% at the smaller heliocentric distances typical of the faintest detections. Because FRM sizes are systematically larger, the diameter scale, the position of the claimed ~100 m break, and both debiased slopes would shift if the FRM alternative (or any intermediate model) were adopted. This systematic must be propagated into the SFD or defended with a reason why NEATM is the correct choice at decameter sizes.
  2. [Abstract, main text, and Fig. 3 caption] The reported cumulative slopes for the size-frequency distribution are mutually inconsistent. The abstract gives q = -2.66 +/- 0.60 for diameters below ~100 m and q = -0.97 +/- 0.14 above; the main text (paragraph after Fig. 4) gives q = -2.25 +/- 0.07 and q = -0.98 +/- 0.14; and the Fig. 3 caption gives q = -2.25 +/- 0.14 and q = -0.98 +/- 0.07. Additionally, the information-content section states that the observed slopes q = -1.45 and q = -0.85 correspond to true slopes q >= -2.2 and q >= -0.95, which is not numerically consistent with any of the quoted pairs. These inconsistencies must be resolved and the final quoted values stated unambiguously before the quantitative SFD claim can be assessed.
  3. [Methods, 'On the information content and sensitivity of the size-frequency distribution'] The debiasing step relies on a mapping between apparent and true SFD slopes that depends on the assumed relative size uncertainty sigma_D/D, shown as a dashed line in Extended Data Fig. 10b, but the text does not state the numerical value of sigma_D/D adopted for the unknown asteroids. The sentence 'somewhat consistent with our JWST observations' is not a quantitative justification, and the resulting debiased slopes are central to the paper's headline claim. The authors should specify the actual distribution of sigma_D/D for the 139 detections and show how the inferred true slopes and their uncertainties respond to a conservative range of sigma_D/D values, including the larger size uncertainties that would result from the FRM thermal model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract reports '138 detections' while the main text and figure captions consistently report 139 detections; this number should be corrected in the abstract.
  2. [Figure 13 and Figure 14 captions] The captions contain the typo 'Overiew' instead of 'Overview'.
  3. [Methods, 'Orbit estimations'] The text refers to 'Fg. 5' instead of 'Fig. 5'.
  4. [Extended Data Figure 10 caption] The caption uses the label 'c' twice for the third and fourth panels; the fourth panel should be labeled 'd'.
  5. [Extended Data Figure 5] The axis label and legend use '1-sig' and '3-sig' instead of the standard '1-sigma' and '3-sigma'; this is a cosmetic issue but should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SFD break and slopes are derived from measured fluxes through a transparent radiometric chain; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks: JWST/MIRI images are searched with synthetic tracking, whose completeness is independently characterized by injection-recovery tests; fluxes are calibrated against TRAPPIST-1's known F1500W flux; distances are inferred from ensembles of known asteroids and validated by recovering the distances of eight known asteroids; sizes are then obtained via NEATM radiometry. The debiased size-frequency distribution is produced by propagating the measured size uncertainties through Monte Carlo simulations and by forward-modeling the mapping between apparent and true power-law slopes, rather than by fitting the target slopes as inputs. The break near 100 m appears in the observed (non-debiased) SFD and is not imposed by the debiasing procedure. The paper explicitly acknowledges that NEATM is not well tested at decameter sizes and that fast-rotating models give larger sizes; this is a model-uncertainty / correctness risk, not circularity, because the claimed slopes are not defined in terms of the model choice. Self-citations to the authors' synthetic tracking framework and to submitted family-collision models are used as tools or interpretive context; the quantitative SFD result does not reduce to these citations. The inconsistent slope values between the abstract, main text, and figure captions are an internal-consistency issue, not evidence of circularity. Overall, no step in the derivation is equivalent by construction to its own input, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its quantitative result rests on several adopted models and prior choices: the NEATM thermal model, the population-based distance prior, the literature beaming relation, a limited completeness correction, and a Monte Carlo debiasing model. These are reasonable tools, but they are assumed rather than independently verified for decameter main-belt asteroids.

free parameters (1)
  • Speed/PA ellipse widths for distance priors = 1-sigma widths of 5% in speed and 0.5 deg in PA; 3-sigma and 10-sigma ellipses scale these by 3 and 10
    These widths define which known asteroids are used as distance proxies for each unknown detection. They were chosen to match typical uncertainties, not fitted to this dataset. The paper reports that distance estimates are insensitive to the ellipse choice, but the central size scale still depends on this prior selection.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption NEATM thermal model applies to decameter main-belt asteroids, with emissivity fixed at 0.9 and beaming parameter taken from a literature relation.
    Methods, 'Size and albedo determination'. The paragraph explicitly says NEATM is not well tested for very small asteroids and that a fast-rotating model gives sizes about 50% larger. The paper proceeds with NEATM anyway.
  • domain assumption Distances to unknown asteroids can be estimated from ensembles of known asteroids with similar speed and position angle within a 6 by 2 degree area around TRAPPIST-1.
    Methods, 'Orbit estimations'. The method is validated on eight known asteroids, but the unknown 139 objects have no orbit confirmation, so the distance prior carries the full distance determination.
  • domain assumption The eta(alpha) beaming relation from Aligo-Lagoa et al. 2018, based on more than 5000 asteroids observed at 9 and 18 microns, applies to single-band MIRI F1500W observations at 15 microns.
    Methods, 'Size and albedo determination'. The paper inflates the relation uncertainty to 10%, but the relation itself is an external calibration from larger asteroids.
  • domain assumption Injection-recovery completeness measured for position angles 70 to 80 degrees and speeds 0.2 to 0.3 arcsec/min represents completeness over the full search space.
    Methods, 'Asteroid detection efficiency'. The injection tests use a narrow PA and speed range chosen as typical, and recovery rates outside that range are not measured.
  • domain assumption The SFD debiasing mapping from apparent slope to true slope is valid under Gaussian diameter uncertainties with sigma proportional to D and a sample size of about 150.
    Methods, 'On the information content and sensitivity of the size-frequency distribution'. The correction is built from synthetic populations with known slopes and assumed uncertainty distributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST sighting of decameter main-belt asteroids and view on meteorite sources." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KBQC7KKQ

@misc{pith2026250201744,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST sighting of decameter main-belt asteroids and view on meteorite sources},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KBQC7KKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01744}
}
abstract

Asteroid discoveries are essential for planetary-defense efforts aiming to prevent impacts with Earth, including the more frequent megaton explosions from decameter impactors. While large asteroids ($\geq$100 km) have remained in the main belt since their formation, small asteroids are commonly transported to the near-Earth object (NEO) population. However, due to the lack of direct observational constraints, their size-frequency distribution--which informs our understanding of the NEOs and the delivery of meteorite samples to Earth--varies significantly among models. Here, we report 138 detections of the smallest asteroids ($\gtrapprox $10 m) ever observed in the main belt, which were enabled by JWST's infrared capabilities covering the asteroids' emission peaks and synthetic tracking techniques. Despite small orbital arcs, we constrain the objects' distances and phase angles using known asteroids as proxies, allowing us to derive sizes via radiometric techniques. Their size-frequency distribution exhibits a break at ${\sim}100$ m (debiased cumulative slopes of $q = -2.66\pm0.60$ and $-0.97\pm0.14$ for diameters smaller and larger than $\sim $100 m, respectively), suggestive of a population driven by collisional cascade. These asteroids were sampled from multiple asteroid families--most likely Nysa, Polana and Massalia--according to the geometry of pointings considered here. Through additional long-stare infrared observations, JWST is poised to serendipitously detect thousands of decameter-scale asteroids across the sky, probing individual asteroid families and the source regions of meteorites "in-situ".

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01744 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Basics of a blind search for asteroids using synthetic tracking. a. Average stack of exposures 4,000 to 4,500 from PID 3077 centered on the ultra-cool star TRAPPIST-1, revealing two known bright asteroids (2004 GH89 and 2016 UR72) crossing the left side of the field of view (FoV). Being bright, they are detectable on individual exposures, leading to a trail on the stacked exposure marked by the orange and blue dotte… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. JWST’s far-infrared window into the main-belt asteroid population. a. Radiation Density (Jy) normalized to the peak emission for 0.1-albedo asteroids with an heliocentric dis￾tance of 1.5 (blue), 2.5 (red), and 3.5 au (yellow) showcasing the favorable infrared-to-visible flux ratio. b. Minimum radius of an asteroid detectable for a 0.5 µJy detection threshold at 15 µm compared to state-of-the-art capabilities in the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Flux-diameter and size-frequency relationships for the 139 new asteroids. a. Fluxes, diameters, and heliocentric distances of the new asteroids range from 0.5 to 600 µJy, 10 to 500 m, and 1.8 to 4.5 au, respectively. The dash-dot, solid, and dotted lines represent the size-flux relationships for objects at 2.00, 2.50, and 3.25 au, respectively. The large uncertainty on the size of bright asteroids despite precise fl… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Asteroids observed by the JWST have a size-frequency distribution with a break at ∼100 m, revealing a population in collisional equilibrium. The observed (gray) and debiased (blue) cumulative SFDs, N(>D) = CDq , are shown together with corresponding slopes q (dotted). …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: a.). Similarly we note that it is pivotal to account for the expected distribution of uncertainties as well as the sample size when building the models to be compared with the SFD. Indeed, standard theoretical models are built assuming that a remarkably large number o…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Proof-of-concept application of population-based estimation of a distance to an asteroid (a) Speed and position angle of 2004 GH89 asteroid (black dot) compared to an en￾semble of other known asteroids close to the field of view at the time of the observation together …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Proof-of-concept application of the population-based orbit derivation for the eight known asteroids. (Top) Derived heliocentric distance for the eight known asteroids based on the 1-σ, 3-σ, and 10-σ neighbors (blue, red, green). (Bottom) Same for the radiometric diamet…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Completeness test and recovery rate. Fraction of recovered synthetic asteroids as a function of their flux based on injection recovery tests to assess the completeness of our search and correct the derived size-frequency distribution. The shaded area represent the 1-σ …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phased rotational lightcurve of 2001 YP90. Photometric observations of 2001 YP90 obtained with the Artemis telescope67 (in green) indicate a rotation period of 5.7701 ± 0.0001 h and an amplitude of 0.87 ± 0.10 mag. The red curve corresponds to the MIRI observations shi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spectro-photometric taxonomic types of bright asteroids 2001 YP90 and 1997 GP4. Data were obtained with SDSS griz filters. Best-fit taxonomic types were determined based on minimizing RMS residuals between the data and re-sampled templates of taxonomic types in the Bus…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Information content and sensitivity analysis of a size-frequency distribution. a. Comparison between the SFD derived using the best size estimate (i.e. median) for each asteroid (red), and the median SFD (black) derived via the Monte Carlo method42 from an ensemble of…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Orbital elements of known asteroids located close to the field of TRAPPIST￾1. All these asteroids had a similar proper motion and position angle as the unknown asteroids observed by the JWST. Their proper semimajor axis ap versus the proper inclination sin ip (blue ci…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Young and old asteroid families have very different size-frequency distributions between 1,000 and 50 m. A comparison of synthetic distributions of asteroid families from refs. 13, 14, 28 shows that prominent young families (Massalia, Koronis2, Karin) commonly have a …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Overiew of the Supplementary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Overiew of the Supplementary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cheng, A. F. et al. AIDA DART asteroid deflection test: Planetary defense and science objectives. Planetary Space Science 157, 104–115 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    E., ReVelle, D

    Brown, P., Spalding, R. E., ReVelle, D. O., Tagliaferri, E. & Worden, S. P. The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth. Nature 420, 294–296 (2002)

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    F., Thomas, P

    Chyba, C. F., Thomas, P. J. & Zahnle, K. J. The 1908 Tunguska explosion: atmospheric disruption of a stony asteroid. Nature 361, 40–44 (1993)

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    Chao, E. C. T., Shoemaker, E. M. & Madsen, B. M. First Natural Occurrence of Coesite. Science 132, 220–222 (1960)

    work page 1960

  5. [5]

    St ¨offler, D., Artemieva, N. A. & Pierazzo, E. Modeling the Ries-Steinheim impact event and the formation of the moldavite strewn field.Meteor. Planet. Sci.37, 1893–1907 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Near-Earth asteroid 2012 TC4 observing campaign: Results from a global planetary defense exercise

    Reddy, V .et al. Near-Earth asteroid 2012 TC4 observing campaign: Results from a global planetary defense exercise. Icarus 326, 133–150 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Bottke, W. F. et al. The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt. Icarus 175, 111–140 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    & Hartmann, W

    Farinella, P., V okrouhlick ´y, D. & Hartmann, W. K. Meteorite Delivery via Yarkovsky Orbital Drift. Icarus 132, 378–387 (1998). 44

    work page 1998

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Chesley, S. R. et al. Direct Detection of the Yarkovsky Effect by Radar Ranging to Asteroid 6489 Golevka. Science 302, 1739–1742 (2003)

    2003

  2. [10]

    Brown, P. G. et al. A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors. Nature 503, 238–241 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Harris, A. W. & Chodas, P. W. The population of near-earth asteroids revisited and updated. Icarus 365, 114452 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Nesvorn ´y, D. et al. NEOMOD 2: An updated model of Near-Earth Objects from a decade of Catalina Sky Survey observations. Icarus 411, 115922 (2024). 2312.09406

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bro ˇz, M. et al. Young asteroid families as the primary source of meteorites.Nature, submit. (2024). 2403.08552

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Marsset, M. et al. The Massalia asteroid family as the origin of ordinary L chondrites. Nature, submit. (2024). 2403.08548

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M ¨uller, T. G. et al. Asteroids seen by JWST-MIRI: Radiometric size, distance, and orbit constraints. Astron. Astrophys. 670, A53 (2023). 2302.06921

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    & Hut, P

    Tyson, J., Guhathakurta, P., Bernstein, G. & Hut, P. Limits on the surface density of faint kuiper belt objects. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, vol. 181, 06–10 (1992). 45

    1992

  9. [17]

    Shao, M. et al. Finding very small near-earth asteroids using synthetic tracking. Astrophys. J. 782, 1 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Y ., Hasler, S

    Burdanov, A. Y ., Hasler, S. N. & de Wit, J. GPU-based framework for detecting small Solar system bodies in targeted exoplanet surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 4568– 4578 (2023). 2303.07293

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    & Carruba, V

    Nesvorn ´y, D., Broˇz, M. & Carruba, V . Identification and Dynamical Properties of Asteroid Families. In Michel, P., DeMeo, F. E. & Bottke, W. F. (eds.) Asteroids IV, 297–321 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    & Kavelaars, J

    Gladman, B. & Kavelaars, J. J. Kuiper Belt searches from the Palomar 5-m telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 317, L35–L38 (1997). astro-ph/9610150

    1997 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bernstein, G. M. et al. The Size Distribution of Trans-Neptunian Bodies. Astron. J. 128, 1364–1390 (2004). astro-ph/0308467

    2004 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Zhai, C. et al. Detection of a Faint Fast-moving Near-Earth Asteroid Using the Synthetic Tracking Technique. Astrophys. J. 792, 60 (2014). 1403.4353

    2014 arXiv

  15. [23]

    N., Metchev, S

    Heinze, A. N., Metchev, S. & Trollo, J. Digital Tracking Observations Can Discover Asteroids 10 Times Fainter Than Conventional Searches. Astron. J. 150, 125 (2015). 1508.01599

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hasler, S. N. et al. Small body harvest with the Antarctic Search for Transiting Exoplanets (ASTEP) project. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 3601–3609 (2023). 2309.14180. 46

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Rieke, G. H. et al. The Mid-Infrared Instrument for the James Webb Space Telescope, VII: The MIRI Detectors. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific127, 665 (2015). 1508.02362

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dohnanyi, J. S. Collisional Model of Asteroids and Their Debris. Journal of Geophysics Research 74, 2531–2554 (1969)

    1969

  19. [27]

    & Asphaug, E

    Benz, W. & Asphaug, E. Catastrophic Disruptions Revisited. Icarus 142, 5–20 (1999). arXiv:astro-ph/9907117

    1999 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bro ˇz, M. et al. Source regions of carbonaceous meteorites and NEOs. Astron. Astrophys., submit. (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Gladman, B. J. et al. On the asteroid belt’s orbital and size distribution. Icarus 202, 104– 118 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    Ryan, E. L. et al. The kilometer-sized Main Belt asteroid population revealed by Spitzer. Astron. Astrophys. 578, A42 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Garc ´ıa-Mart´ın, P. et al. Hubble Asteroid Hunter. III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids. Astron. Astrophys. 683, A122 (2024). 2401.02605

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Redfield, S. et al. Report of the Working Group on Strategic Exoplanet Initiatives with HST and JWST. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2404.02932 (2024). 2404.02932

    2024 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Zieba, S. et al. No thick carbon dioxide atmosphere on the rocky exoplanet TRAPPIST-1 c. Nature 620, 746–749 (2023). 2306.10150

    2023 arXiv

  26. [35]

    R., Paolicchi, P., Cellino, A

    Farinella, P., Davis, D. R., Paolicchi, P., Cellino, A. & Zappala, V . Asteroid collisional evo- lution - an integrated model for the evolution of asteroid rotation rates. Astron. Astrophys. 253, 604–614 (1992)

    1992

  27. [36]

    Bottke, J., William F., V okrouhlick´y, D., Rubincam, D. P. & Nesvorn´y, D. The Yarkovsky and Yorp Effects: Implications for Asteroid Dynamics. Annual Review of Earth and Plan- etary Sciences 34, 157–191 (2006)

    2006

  28. [37]

    Carruba, V . et al. The population of rotational fission clusters inside asteroid collisional families. Nature Astronomy 4, 83–88 (2020)

    2020

  29. [38]

    Spin axes and shape models of asteroid pairs: Fingerprints of YORP and a path to the density of rubble piles

    Polishook, D. Spin axes and shape models of asteroid pairs: Fingerprints of YORP and a path to the density of rubble piles. Icarus 241, 79–96 (2014). 1406.3359

    2014 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Dinsmore, J. T. & de Wit, J. Constraining the interiors of asteroids through close encoun- ters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 3459–3475 (2023). 2210.10754

    2023 arXiv

  31. [40]

    LSST Science Book, Version 2.0

    LSST Science Collaboration et al. LSST Science Book, Version 2.0. arXiv e-prints arXiv:0912.0201 (2009). 0912.0201

    2009 arXiv

  32. [41]

    W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F

    Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F. & Michel, H. V . Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction. Science 208, 1095–1108 (1980). 48

    1980

  33. [42]

    & Ulam, S

    Metropolis, N. & Ulam, S. The monte carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical As- sociation 44, 335–341 (1949). URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2280232

    1949

  34. [43]

    Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  35. [44]

    Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9, 90–95 (2007)

    2007

  36. [45]

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy.Astron

    Astropy Collaboration et al. Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy.Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013). 1307.6212

    2013 arXiv

  37. [46]

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration et al. The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. Astron. J. 156, 123 (2018). 1801.02634

    2018 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17, 261–272 (2020)

    2020

  39. [48]

    development team, T. P. pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas (2020). URL https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

  40. [49]

    Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python

    Wes McKinney. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. In St ´efan van der Walt & Jarrod Millman (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference , 56 – 61 (2010). 49

    2010

  41. [50]

    Ginsburg, A. et al. astroquery: An Astronomical Web-querying Package in Python.Astron. J. 157, 98 (2019). 1901.04520

    2019 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Bradley, L. et al. astropy/photutils: 1.8.0 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.7946442

    2023

  43. [52]

    Tycho tracker: A new tool to facilitate the discovery and recovery of asteroids using synthetic tracking and modern gpu hardware

    Parrott, D. Tycho tracker: A new tool to facilitate the discovery and recovery of asteroids using synthetic tracking and modern gpu hardware. Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO)48, 262 (2020)

    2020

  44. [53]

    Greene, T. P. et al. Thermal emission from the Earth-sized exoplanet TRAPPIST-1 b using JWST. Nature 618, 39–42 (2023). 2303.14849

    2023 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Hoffmann, T. et al. Debiasing astro-photometric observations with corrections using statis- tics (dephocus). arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07474(2024). URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2408.07474. 2408.07474

    2024 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Harris, A. W. A Thermal Model for Near-Earth Asteroids. Icarus 131, 291–301 (1998)

    1998

  47. [56]

    Masiero, J. R. et al. Main Belt Asteroids with WISE/NEOWISE. I. Preliminary Albedos and Diameters. Astrophys. J. 741, 68 (2011). 1109.4096

    2011 arXiv

  48. [57]

    & Delbo’, M

    Al ´ı-Lagoa, V . & Delbo’, M. Sizes and albedos of Mars-crossing asteroids from WISE/NEOWISE data. Astron. Astrophys. 603, A55 (2017). 1705.10263. 50

    2017 arXiv

  49. [58]

    G., Usui, F

    Al ´ı-Lagoa, V ., M¨uller, T. G., Usui, F. & Hasegawa, S. The AKARI IRC asteroid flux catalogue: updated diameters and albedos. Astron. Astrophys. 612, A85 (2018). 1712. 07496

    2018

  50. [59]

    D., Green, S

    Wolters, S. D., Green, S. F., McBride, N. & Davies, J. K. Thermal infrared and optical observations of four near-Earth asteroids. Icarus 193, 535–552 (2008)

    2008

  51. [60]

    Mainzer, A. et al. NEOWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results. Astrophys. J. 743, 156 (2011). 1109.6400

    2011 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Grav, T. et al. WISE/NEOWISE Observations of the Hilda Population: Preliminary Re- sults. Astrophys. J. 744, 197 (2012). 1110.0283

    2012 arXiv

  53. [62]

    TNOs are Cool

    Vilenius, E. et al. “TNOs are Cool”: A survey of the trans-Neptunian region. VI. Her- schel/PACS observations and thermal modeling of 19 classical Kuiper belt objects.Astron. Astrophys. 541, A94 (2012). 1204.0697

    2012 arXiv

  54. [63]

    & Harris, A

    Pravec, P. & Harris, A. W. Fast and Slow Rotation of Asteroids. Icarus 148, 12–20 (2000)

    2000

  55. [64]

    Lebofsky, L. A. & Spencer, J. R. Radiometry and thermal modeling of asteroids. In Binzel, R. P., Gehrels, T. & Matthews, M. S. (eds.)Asteroids II, 128–147 (1989)

    1989

  56. [65]

    Harris, A. W. & Lagerros, J. S. V . Asteroids in the Thermal Infrared. In Asteroids III, 205–218 (2002). 51

    2002

  57. [66]

    DeMeo, F. E. & Carry, B. Solar System evolution from compositional mapping of the asteroid belt. Nature 505, 629–634 (2014). 1408.2787

    2014 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Burdanov, A. Y . et al. SPECULOOS Northern Observatory: Searching for Red Worlds in the Northern Skies. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific134, 105001 (2022). 2209.09112

    2022 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Delrez, L. et al. SPECULOOS: a network of robotic telescopes to hunt for terrestrial planets around the nearest ultracool dwarfs. In Marshall, H. K. & Spyromilio, J. (eds.) Ground- based and Airborne Telescopes VII, vol. 10700 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Enginee...

    2018 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Jehin, E. et al. Trappist: Transiting planets and planetesimals small telescope. The Mes- senger 145, 2–6 (2011)

    2011

  61. [70]

    PHOTOMETRYPIPELINE: An automated pipeline for calibrated photom- etry

    Mommert, M. PHOTOMETRYPIPELINE: An automated pipeline for calibrated photom- etry. Astronomy and Computing 18, 47–53 (2017). 1702.00834

    2017 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Levine, S. E. et al. Status and performance of the Discovery Channel Telescope during commissioning. In Stepp, L. M., Gilmozzi, R. & Hall, H. J. (eds.) Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IV, vol. 8444 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Se...

    2012

  63. [72]

    Christensen, E. J. et al. Status of the Catalina Sky Survey. In LPI Contributions, vol. 2851 of LPI Contributions, 2587 (2023). 52

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.