Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 83 references

General kinetic ion induced electron emission model for metallic walls applied to biased Z-pinch electrodes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A kinetic model for ion-induced electron emission from metallic walls shows that secondary electrons emitted by Z-pinch electrodes raise the device current and partially close the gap between absorbing-wall theory and experiment.

desk verdict Useful kinetic IIEE boundary condition and a plausible qualitative story for Z-pinch currents, but the quantitative match is riding on an artificially collisional, energy-conserving-but-not scheme. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01802 v2 pith:MEDAXSWS submitted 2025-02-03 physics.plasm-ph

Chirag R. Skolar , Kolter Bradshaw , Manaure Francisquez , Lucio Murillo , Vignesh Krishna Kumar , Bhuvana Srinivasan This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords ioninducedelectronemissionsecondaryyieldkineticplasmasheathZ-pinchBoltzmann-Poissonsimulationcontinuummethodplasma-materialinteractionsemittedenergyspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a kinetic model of ion-induced electron emission from metallic surfaces and uses it as a boundary condition in one-dimensional Boltzmann-Poisson simulations of a Z-pinch plasma between two biased copper electrodes. The central quantitative claim is that including ion-induced electron emission changes the current-voltage behavior: the emissionless cases saturate at about 130 kA, while the emission cases keep rising with bias potential, reaching roughly 273 kA at 9 kV and matching the measured 200 kA at a 4 kV bias with a simulated 201 kA. The paper argues that this partially explains the gap between measured Z-pinch currents and the saturation limit of perfectly absorbing wall theory. It also establishes that even when the secondary electron yield exceeds one, the sheath remains classical rather than space-charge limited or inverse, because the emitted electron flux stays below the space-charge saturation limit.

What carries the argument

The central object is the emitted-electron energy spectrum from the ionization cascade model, written as $\mathrm{d}\gamma/\mathrm{d}E_e = S_i(E_i)\,\frac{\Gamma_r E_e}{4(E_e+W)^2 S_e(E_e+W)}$, where $S_i$ is the ion stopping power, $S_e$ is the electron stopping power evaluated at $E_e+W$, and $W$ is the material barrier height (work function plus Fermi energy). Because only the wall-dependent part varies with electron energy, the spectrum's shape is fixed for a given material and the ion stopping power merely scales it; the paper fits that shape with a log-Gaussian $g(E_e)$ so the secondary electron yield is $\gamma \propto S_i(E_i)$, and the emitted electron distribution function is obtained by summing monoenergetic contributions over the discretized ion distribution. This spectrum feeds a continuum-kinetic boundary condition that injects emitted electrons into the domain, and the load-bearing mechanism is the feedback loop in which sheath-accelerated emitted electrons heat the plasma, raising the plasma potential, increasing ion impact energies, and boosting the secondary electron yield.

What would settle it

Measure the current-versus-bias curve in a clean-copper-electrode Z-pinch experiment from 0 to 9 kV: the central claim predicts no saturation, with the current rising past 200 kA to about 273 kA at 9 kV and a strong increase beginning above 1 kV, so a measured saturation near the 130 kA absorbing-wall limit would contradict the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central discovery is that a kinetic ion-induced electron emission boundary condition, built from an ionization-cascade emission spectrum with updated low-energy ion and electron stopping powers, enables electron flux to leave the cathode and thereby raises the total current in the domain. In their simulations the current increases from about 130 kA with absorbing walls to 273 kA at 9 kV, and the 4 kV case at 201 kA most closely matches the measured 200 kA. The mechanism is a positive feedback: emitted cathode electrons are accelerated by the sheath potential and collisionally heat the plasma; above 1 kV bias this heating raises the plasma potential, which accelerates ions to higher impact energies and increases the secondary electron yield. The paper further claims that despite cathode secondary electron yields above unity, the sheath remains classical with a monotonic potential because the emitted flux is below the space-charge-limited current threshold, and it argues that the disparity between theory and experiment is therefore partially explained by ion-induced electron emission.

Load-bearing premise

The central result relies on the simulated electron heating being quantitatively right, but the plasma model conserves particle number at the expense of energy and uses an artificially increased collision frequency, so the computed plasma potential rise, secondary electron yield, and current could change materially under energy-conserving or realistic-collision conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Including ion-induced electron emission removes the current saturation: the simulated current rises with bias potential to about 273 kA at 9 kV, versus 130 kA for absorbing walls.
  • The emission case matches the experiment most closely at 4 kV bias, where the simulated 201 kA nearly equals the measured 200 kA, giving a partial explanation for the theory-experiment gap.
  • Cathode-emitted electrons heated by the sheath potential raise the plasma potential above 1 kV bias, and this heating is the reason the secondary electron yield at both electrodes grows with bias despite the usual expectation that emissions reduce the sheath potential.
  • Even with a cathode secondary electron yield greater than one, the sheath stays classical because the emitted electron flux never reaches the space-charge-limited current threshold.
  • The ion-induced electron emission model is general for proton, deuteron, or triton impact on metallic walls, so the same boundary condition applies to other high-energy plasma-wall systems such as arcjet thrusters and tokamak edge biasing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 4 kV current match is computed for copper on both electrodes, whereas the experimental device uses a graphite cathode; an ion-induced electron emission model valid for graphite could shift the matching bias or current, so the agreement should be read as material-specific until graphite is included.
  • Because the plasma model conserves particles at the expense of energy, the heating-driven rise in plasma potential above 1 kV likely depends on the energy-conservation choice; an energy-conserving source or a power-inflow boundary condition could materially alter the secondary electron yield and the claimed current enhancement.
  • In a magnetized Z-pinch, emitted electrons gyrate about the azimuthal field and can return to the wall within a gyroradius, so the unmagnetized ion-induced electron emission current should be treated as an upper bound unless the model is extended to account for this recapture.
  • The positive feedback between electron heating, plasma potential, and secondary electron yield suggests a possible emission runaway or oscillatory sheath regime for stronger emitters such as oxidized electrodes or higher ion temperatures, which the paper's steady classical-sheath conclusion might not cover; this could be tested by simulations with oxidizing-surface yield models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general kinetic model for ion-induced electron emission (IIEE) from metallic surfaces, based on an ionization-cascade mechanism with empirical ion and electron stopping powers, and fits the emitted-electron energy spectrum to a log-Gaussian for use as a boundary condition in continuum kinetic simulations. The model is validated against measured emitted-electron spectra and SEY data for several metals (Cu, Al, Au), with documented underprediction for Li and W. The authors then apply the IIEE boundary condition in 1X-1V unmagnetized Boltzmann-Poisson simulations of a doubly biased Z-pinch plasma with copper electrodes, varying bias from 0 to 9 kV. They find that emitted cathode electrons are accelerated into the plasma, collisionally heat the bulk electrons, raise the plasma potential, and increase the electrode current; with IIEE the current reaches 201 kA at 4 kV and 273 kA at 9 kV, compared with about 130 kA without emissions and the FuZE experimental value of about 200 kA. The authors conclude that IIEE can partially explain the discrepancy between saturation-limited theory and experiment.

Significance. If the central result is robust, the paper makes a useful contribution by providing a practical kinetic IIEE boundary condition and by identifying a physically plausible mechanism—secondary emission raising the electrode current through collisional heating of the bulk plasma—that could resolve part of the Z-pinch current discrepancy. The IIEE model is validated against multiple independent experimental datasets for copper, aluminum, and gold, and the code and input files are publicly available, which are concrete strengths. The model is clearly limited to proton/deuteron/triton impact on metallic walls, and the quantitative Z-pinch simulation result rests on two numerical approximations whose impact is not quantified: an artificially increased collision frequency and an energy-nonconserving particle source. The qualitative statement that IIEE increases current is likely robust, but the specific 201 kA agreement with experiment is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (19)-(24), and Section IV, Fig. 12(e)] The quantitative current increase—201 kA at 4 kV and 273 kA at 9 kV—is produced by a feedback loop in which emitted cathode electrons collisionally heat the bulk electrons, raising Te, raising the plasma potential via Eq. (33), increasing ion impact energies and SEY, and thus further increasing emission. This loop is controlled in part by the artificially short mean free path, lambda_MFP = 50 lambda_D, used in Eqs. (19)-(24). At the FuZE parameters of this work (n0 = 1.1e23 m^-3, T0 = 2 keV), the physical electron mean free path is estimated to be several hundred lambda_D, so the emitted electron beam thermalizes roughly an order of magnitude faster in the simulation than it would physically. The bulk heating shown in Fig. 10(b), the reversal of the plasma-potential trend above 1 kV in Fig. 9, and the resulting SEY and current are therefore all amplified by this numerical choice. The authors should either run with physical collisionality (with a correspondingly larger domain or reduced domain size) or perform a convergence study in lambda_MFP and show that the qualitative and quantitative results are insensitive to this parameter. As written, the claim that the 4 kV case 'most closely matches' experiment is not robust against this numerical approximation.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (25), and Section V] The source term S_alpha in Eq. (25) conserves particle number but not energy, because it re-injects both species as Maxwellians at the fixed initial temperature T0 and does not replenish the energy lost to the walls. The authors acknowledge this in Section V ('the choice was made in our plasma model to conserve particles at the cost of energy'), but the consequence is directly load-bearing: the central current increase is driven by the electron temperature rise, and that temperature rise is affected by the artificial energy balance imposed by the source. A quantitative statement such as '201 kA at 4 kV' requires either an energy-conserving source or a demonstration that a realistic power-inflow boundary condition does not materially change the plasma potential, SEY, and current. The present discussion is qualitative and does not quantify the sensitivity.
  3. [Section IV, Fig. 12(e)] The comparison with experiment is made by selecting, post hoc, the single bias potential (4 kV) that gives the closest current to the FuZE value of 200 kA. Since the experimental current is given without uncertainty and the model has several adjustable numerical parameters (lambda_MFP, L_src, and the Gaussian fit parameters), a single-point match is a weak form of validation. The paper should present the current--bias curve as a prediction, report the uncertainty or spread associated with the model parameters, and discuss why a range of bias potentials (not just one) should be compared. This would considerably strengthen the claim that IIEE 'partially explains' the theory-experiment gap.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II E, Fig. 2] The 'renormalized model' curve (dotted orange line) is not defined; please state explicitly how the renormalization is performed and what scaling factor is applied.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 12(c) discussion] The sentence 'this is the same pattern as what is found in the anode SEY annd the shifts in velocities' contains a typo ('annd' should be 'and').
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The label 'Emitted Elc' in the caption appears truncated; it should read 'Emitted Electron' or similar.
  4. [Section V, discussion near Eq. (33)] The phrase 'The term in the logarithm will always be negative' is unclear; the logarithm itself is negative for realistic parameters, while its argument is positive. Please rephrase for clarity.
  5. [Section I, introduction] The phrase 'to expore the effects' contains a typo ('expore' should be 'explore').

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the IIEE model and Z-pinch current are self-contained against external empirical data, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The emitted-electron spectrum (Eq. 2) is built from an external cascade model (Schou) and external empirical stopping powers (Andersen-Ziegler for ions, Nguyen-Truong for electrons), with material constants from standard tabulations; the resulting spectrum and SEY are then compared against independent experimental datasets (Figs. 2 and 4). The Gaussian coefficients in Table I are fits to the model spectrum itself, not to the experimental SEY and not to the FuZE current, so the SEY used in the simulations is not a back-fit to the claimed outcome. The emitted-electron distribution function used as a boundary condition (Eq. 17) is derived in the text from Eqs. 12 and 16, so the central boundary-condition mechanism is not imported solely from the authors' prior work. The Z-pinch simulation parameters (n0 = 1.1e23 m^-3, T0 = 2 keV, pinch radius 3 mm, copper walls) come from the cited FuZE experiment and standard material data; no parameter is tuned to hit the 200 kA experimental current. The statement that the 4 kV case 'most closely matches experiment' is a post-hoc selection from a bias-potential sweep, which weakens the predictive force of that comparison but is not parameter fitting or a definitional identity. The artificially increased collision frequency (lambda_MFP = 50 lambda_D) and the particle-conserving but energy-nonconserving source term (Eq. 25) are acknowledged modeling choices that affect quantitative robustness, but they are not circular inputs: they are not chosen using the target current. The paper's self-citations (Refs. 5, 19, 20) provide numerical setup details and an implementation framework that are also stated or derived in the present text; they are not invoked as unexamined uniqueness theorems or as the sole justification for the load-bearing physics. The qualitative increase of current with IIEE is expected from the emitting boundary condition, but the magnitudes, the SEY behavior, the plasma-potential reversal above 1 kV, and the non-saturating current are emergent simulation results rather than identities. No step reduces the claimed derivation to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Schou cascade model, empirical stopping power models, and several numerical choices (enhanced collisions, particle-conserving but energy non-conserving source, 1X-1V geometry). No new physical entities are introduced. The Gaussian coefficients are derived from the model itself, not fitted to the target Z-pinch current.

free parameters (4)
  • Gaussian fit width tau = e.g., Cu: 1.210 (dimensionless)
    Fitted via scipy.optimize.curve_fit to the wall part of Eq. 2; used in Eq. 14 for SEY and in the emitted electron distribution (Eq. 17).
  • Gaussian peak energy E0 = e.g., Cu: 2.807 eV
    Same fit; sets the energy scale of emitted electrons.
  • Mean free path multiplier for collisions = 50 lambda_D
    Chosen by hand to thermalize the presheath in the reduced 1X-1V domain; affects all collision frequencies (Eqs. 19-22).
  • Particle source length L_src = 100 lambda_D
    Chosen by hand; defines the region where the particle-conserving source (Eq. 25) is active.
assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Kinetic IIEE follows Schou's ionization cascade mechanism with a free electron gas in the wall.
    Sec. II A; limits applicability to metals and assumes cascade transport.
  • domain assumption Electronic stopping power dominates over nuclear stopping power for both ions and electrons in the relevant energy ranges.
    Sec. II, before Sec. II B; used in Eqs. 2, 3, 6.
  • domain assumption The Andersen-Ziegler empirical ion stopping power model is accurate for protons, deuterons, and tritons down to 1 keV.
    Sec. II B; Z-pinch ion energies are below 100 keV; model has 20-30% accuracy.
  • domain assumption The Nguyen-Truong modified Bethe formula gives the electron stopping power at low energies, including extrapolation below 50 eV.
    Sec. II C; emitted electron energies are 1-70 eV, below the 50-600 eV validated range.
  • domain assumption The Z-pinch plasma is a proton-electron plasma with n0=1.1e23 m^-3, Ti,0=Te,0=2 keV, matching FuZE conditions.
    Sec. III, Eq. 27 and text.
  • ad hoc to paper Artificially increasing collision frequency (lambda_MFP=50 lambda_D) and using the masking function h(x) yields a thermalized presheath without distorting sheath physics.
    Sec. III, Eqs. 19-24; this is a numerical crutch for the reduced domain size.
  • ad hoc to paper The particle-conserving source term (Eq. 25) does not distort sheath physics and energy non-conservation is acceptable.
    Sec. III and V; energy lost/gained by the source can affect plasma potential and electron temperature.
  • domain assumption Magnetic field effects are negligible because the simulation models the Z-pinch axis where the azimuthal magnetic field is zero.
    Sec. III: 'Magnetic field effects are not considered... center of the Z-pinch, where the magnetic field would be zero.'
  • domain assumption Emitted electrons travel only along the x direction with no angular spread.
    Sec. V: 'our 1X-1V simulations assume that the emitted electrons travel only along the x axis.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of General kinetic ion induced electron emission model for metallic walls applied to biased Z-pinch electrodes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MEDAXSWS

@misc{pith2026250201802,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: General kinetic ion induced electron emission model for metallic walls applied to biased Z-pinch electrodes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MEDAXSWS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01802}
}
read the original abstract

A kinetic ion induced electron emission (IIEE) model for general applications is developed to obtain the emitted electron energy spectrum for a distribution of ion impacts on a metallic surface. We assume an ionization cascade mechanism and use empirical models for the ion and electron stopping powers. The emission spectrum and the secondary electron yield (SEY) are validated for a variety of materials. The IIEE model is used to study the effect of IIEE on the plasma-material interactions of Z-pinch electrodes. Un-magnetized Boltzmann-Poisson simulations are performed for a Z-pinch plasma doubly bounded by two biased copper electrodes with and without IIEE at bias potentials from 0 to 9 kV. At the anode, the SEY decreases from 0 to 1 kV, but then increases at higher bias potentials. At the cathode, the SEY is much larger due to higher energy ion bombardment and grows with bias potential. As the bias potential increases, the emitted cathode electrons are accelerated to higher energies into the domain collisionally heating the plasma. Above 1 kV, the heating is strong enough to increase the plasma potential. Despite SEY greater than 1, only a classical sheath forms as opposed to a space-charge limited or inverse sheath due to the emitted electron flux not reaching the space charge current saturation limits. Furthermore, the current in the emissionless cases saturates to a value lower than experiment. With IIEE, the current does not saturate and continues to increase with the 4 kV case matching most closely with experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01802 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Plots of the ion distribution at the anode (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The energy of peak emission (a) and full width half [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Comparison of model SEY (blue line) to experimental data (markers) for lithium, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plots of the impacting ion distribution function without (a-b) and with (c-d) IIEE at the anode (left) and cathode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Phase space plots of the ion (a-c) and electron (d-f) distribution functions near the cathode without emissions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as Fig. 6 but with IIEE. The emitted beam of electrons is seen accelerating to higher energies into the domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Plots of the electron temperature profiles without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Plot of the electric potential profile for various bias [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Plot of the ion (red) and electron (blue) particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Plots of the SEY (a), normalized ion particle flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Plot of SEY at the anode (pink stars) and the cath [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Plot showing how the theoretical plasma potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    author author P. C. \ Stangeby ,\ @noop title The plasma boundary of magnetic fusion devices ,\ Vol.\ volume 224 \ ( publisher Institute of Physics Pub. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ,\ year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    author author M. A. \ Lieberman \ and\ author A. J. \ Lichtenberg ,\ @noop title Principles of plasma discharges and materials processing \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Levitt , author E

    author author B. Levitt , author E. T. \ Meier , author R. Umstattd , author J. R. \ Barhydt , author I. A. M. \ Datta , author C. Liekhus-Schmaltz , author D. A. \ Sutherland ,\ and\ author B. A. \ Nelson ,\ title title The zap energy approach to commercial fusion , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0163361 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 30 ,\ pag...

    doi:10.1063/5.0163361

  8. [8]

    Shumlak ,\ title title Z-pinch fusion , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 127 ,\ pages 200901 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    author author U. Shumlak ,\ title title Z-pinch fusion , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 127 ,\ pages 200901 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page 2020

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    author author C. R. \ Skolar , author K. Bradshaw , author J. Juno ,\ and\ author B. Srinivasan ,\ title title Continuum kinetic investigation of the impact of bias potentials in the current saturation regime on sheath formation , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0134656 journal jo...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author M. C. \ Thompson , author S. C. \ Simpson , author C. J. \ Beers , author J. Dadras , author E. T. \ Meier ,\ and\ author P. H. \ Stoltz ,\ title title Electrode durability and sheared-flow-stabilized z-pinch fusion energy , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0163381 jo...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author S. D. \ Baalrud , author B. Scheiner , author B. T. \ Yee , author M. M. \ Hopkins ,\ and\ author E. Barnat ,\ title title Interaction of biased electrodes and plasmas: sheaths, double layers, and fireballs , \ @noop journal journal Plasma Sources Science and Tec...

    2020

  4. [12]

    Zhang , author U

    author author Y. Zhang , author U. Shumlak , author B. A. \ Nelson , author R. P. \ Golingo , author T. R. \ Weber , author A. D. \ Stepanov , author E. L. \ Claveau , author E. G. \ Forbes , author Z. T. \ Draper , author J. M. \ Mitrani , author H. S. \ McLean , author K. K....

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author N. Benazeth ,\ title title Review on kinetic ion-electron emission from solid metallic targets , \ @noop journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research \ volume 194 ,\ pages 405--413 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  6. [14]

    author author D. Hasselkamp ,\ title Kinetic electron emission from solid surfaces under ion bombardment , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0038298 booktitle Particle Induced Electron Emission II ,\ editor edited by\ editor D. Hasselkamp , editor H. Rothard , editor K.-O. \ Gr...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Varga \ and\ author H

    author author P. Varga \ and\ author H. Winter ,\ title Slow particle-induced electron emission from solid surfaces , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0038300 booktitle Particle Induced Electron Emission II ,\ editor edited by\ editor D. Hasselkamp , editor H. Rothard , editor...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author G. D. \ Hobbs \ and\ author J. A. \ Wesson ,\ title title Heat flow through a langmuir sheath in the presence of electron emission , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0032-1028/9/1/410 journal journal Plasma Physics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 85 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author L. A. \ Schwager ,\ title title Effects of secondary and thermionic electron emission on the collector and source sheaths of a finite ion temperature plasma using kinetic theory and numerical simulation , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.860495 journal journal Physics...

    doi

  10. [18]

    McAdams , author D

    author author R. McAdams , author D. King , author A. Holmes ,\ and\ author E. Surrey ,\ title title Sheath structure in negative ion sources for fusion (invited) , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3670339 journal journal The Review of scientific instruments \ volume 83 ,\ pages 02...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author M. Campanell ,\ title title Negative plasma potential relative to electron-emitting surfaces , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 88 ,\ pages 033103 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  12. [20]

    author author M. D. \ Campanell \ and\ author M. V. \ Umansky ,\ title title Strongly emitting surfaces unable to float below plasma potential , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.085003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 085003 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Cagas , author A

    author author P. Cagas , author A. Hakim , author J. Juno ,\ and\ author B. Srinivasan ,\ title title Continuum kinetic and multi-fluid simulations of classical sheaths , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 24 ,\ pages 022118 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  14. [22]

    Cagas , author A

    author author P. Cagas , author A. Hakim ,\ and\ author B. Srinivasan ,\ title title Plasma-material boundary conditions for discontinuous galerkin continuum-kinetic simulations, with a focus on secondary electron emission , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Computational Phy...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Bradshaw \ and\ author B

    author author K. Bradshaw \ and\ author B. Srinivasan ,\ title title Energy-dependent implementation of secondary electron emission models in continuum kinetic sheath simulations , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ad331c journal journal Plasma Sources Science and Technology...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Bradshaw , author A

    author author K. Bradshaw , author A. Hakim ,\ and\ author B. Srinivasan ,\ title title Effects of oxidation and impurities in lithium surfaces on the emitting wall plasma sheath , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0258265 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 32 ,\ pages 0635...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author R. A. \ Baragiola ,\ title title Principles and applications of ion-induced auger electron emission from solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1080/00337578208225734 journal journal Radiation Effects \ volume 61 ,\ pages 47--72 ( year 1982 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/http...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Schou ,\ title title Transport theory for kinetic emission of secondary electrons from solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.22.2141 journal journal Phys

    author author J. Schou ,\ title title Transport theory for kinetic emission of secondary electrons from solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.22.2141 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 22 ,\ pages 2141--2174 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author J. Schou ,\ title title Secondary electron emission from solids by electron and proton bombardment , \ https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/microscopy/vol2/iss2/1 journal journal Scanning Microscopy \ volume 2 ,\ pages 607--632 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  20. [28]

    author author H. H. \ Andersen \ and\ author J. F. \ Ziegler ,\ @noop title Hydrogen. Stopping powers and ranges in all elements \ ( publisher Pergamon Press Inc. ,\ year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  21. [29]

    author author H. T. \ Nguyen-Truong ,\ title title Modified bethe formula for low-energy electron stopping power without fitting parameters , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.003 journal journal Ultramicroscopy \ volume 149 ,\ pages 26--33 ( year 20...

    2014 doi

  22. [30]

    author author E. J. \ Sternglass ,\ title title Theory of secondary electron emission by high-speed ions , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 1--12 ( year 1957 ) NoStop

    1957 doi

  23. [31]

    author author R. J. \ Beuhler \ and\ author L. Friedman ,\ title title A model of secondary electron yields from atomic and polyatomic ion impacts on copper and tungsten surfaces based upon stopping‐power calculations , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.324267 journal journal Journa...

    doi

  24. [32]

    author author R. A. \ Baragiola , author E. V. \ Alonso ,\ and\ author A. O. \ Florio ,\ title title Electron emission from clean metal surfaces induced by low-energy light ions , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.19.121 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 19 ,\ pages 121--...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author P. H. \ Stoltz , author M. A. \ Furman , author J.-L. \ Vay , author A. W. \ Molvik ,\ and\ author R. H. \ Cohen ,\ title title Numerical simulation of the generation of secondary electrons in the high current experiment , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.6....

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author A. F. \ Haque , author M. Haque , author S. Sultana , author M. A. R. \ Patoary , author M. S. \ Hossain , author M. Maaza ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Uddin ,\ title title Proton-induced secondary electron emission from elemental solids over the energy domain 1 kev-10...

  27. [35]

    author author J. R. \ Rumble ,\ @noop title CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics \ ( publisher CRC press ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  28. [36]

    author author H. Bethe ,\ title title Zur theorie des durchgangs schneller korpuskularstrahlen durch materie , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19303970303 journal journal Annalen der Physik \ volume 397 ,\ pages 325--400 ( year 1930 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/ht...

    doi

  29. [38]

    author author F. Bloch ,\ title title Zur bremsung rasch bewegter teilchen beim durchgang durch materie , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19334080303 journal journal Annalen der Physik \ volume 408 ,\ pages 285--320 ( year 1933 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https:/...

    doi

  30. [39]

    author author W. H. \ Barkas , author J. N. \ Dyer ,\ and\ author H. H. \ Heckman ,\ title title Resolution of the ^ - -mass anomaly , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.26 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 26--28 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    doi

  31. [40]

    author author J. Lindhard ,\ title title The barkas effect - or z13, z14-corrections to stopping of swift charged particles , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(76)90702-3 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods \ volume 132 ,\ pages 1--5 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [41]

    author author M. J. \ Berger , author M. Inokuti , author H. H. \ Andersen , author H. Bichsel , author D. Powers , author S. M. \ Seltzer , author D. Thwaites ,\ and\ author D. E. \ Watt ,\ title title 3. electronic (collision) stopping powers in the low-energy region , \ htt...

    doi

  33. [42]

    author author J. F. \ Ziegler , author M. Ziegler ,\ and\ author J. Biersack ,\ title title Srim – the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010) , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research...

    2010 doi

  34. [43]

    Hasselkamp \ and\ author A

    author author D. Hasselkamp \ and\ author A. Scharmann ,\ title title Molecular effects in ion-induced secondary electron spectra , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(83)90348-1 journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 96 ,\ pages 259--262 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [44]

    author author S. M. \ Seltzer \ and\ author M. J. \ Berger ,\ title title Evaluation of the collision stopping power of elements and compounds for electrons and positrons , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(82)90244-7 journal journal The International Journal...

    doi

  36. [45]

    author author H. B. \ Michaelson ,\ title title The work function of the elements and its periodicity , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.323539 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 48 ,\ pages 4729--4733 ( year 1977 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip...

    doi

  37. [46]

    Lemell , author B

    author author C. Lemell , author B. Solleder , author K. T o o k\'esi ,\ and\ author J. Burgd\"orfer ,\ title title Simulation of attosecond streaking of electrons emitted from a tungsten surface , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.062901 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ vol...

    doi

  38. [47]

    Hasselkamp , author S

    author author D. Hasselkamp , author S. Hippler ,\ and\ author A. Scharmann ,\ title title Ion-induced secondary electron spectra from clean metal surfaces , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(86)80088-X journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Phys...

    doi

  39. [48]

    Scholtz , author D

    author author J. Scholtz , author D. Dijkkamp ,\ and\ author R. Schmitz ,\ title title Secondary electron emission properties , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5817(97)84681-5 journal journal Philips Journal of Research \ volume 50 ,\ pages 375--389 ( year 1996...

    doi

  40. [49]

    author author L. N. \ Large ,\ title title Secondary electron emission from a clean tungsten surface bombarded by various positive ions , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/81/6/315 journal journal Proceedings of the Physical Society \ volume 81 ,\ pages 1101 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    doi

  41. [50]

    author author R. I. \ Ewing ,\ title title Electron emission from a (100) surface under proton bombardment , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.166.324 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 166 ,\ pages 324--325 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968 doi

  42. [51]

    Hasselkamp , author K

    author author D. Hasselkamp , author K. Lang , author A. Scharmann ,\ and\ author N. Stiller ,\ title title Ion induced electron emission from metal surfaces , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(81)90076-8 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods \ volu...

    doi

  43. [52]

    Aarset , author R

    author author B. Aarset , author R. W. \ Cloud ,\ and\ author J. G. \ Trump ,\ title title Electron emission from metals under high‐energy hydrogen ion bombardment , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1721568 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 25 ,\ pages 1365--1368 ...

    doi

  44. [53]

    Morita , author H

    author author K. Morita , author H. Akimune ,\ and\ author T. Suita ,\ title title Secondary electron emission type neutral particle detector , \ https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.5.511 journal journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 5 ,\ pages 511 ( year 1966 ) NoStop

    doi

  45. [54]

    Foti , author R

    author author G. Foti , author R. Potenza ,\ and\ author A. Triglia ,\ title title Secondary-electron emission from various materials bombarded with protons at e_p<2.5 mev , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763140 journal journal Lettere al Nuovo Cimento \ volume 11 ,\ pages 659-...

    doi

  46. [55]

    author author H. P. \ Beck \ and\ author R. Langkau ,\ title title Die sekundärelektronen-ausbeute verschiedener materialien bei beschuß mit leichten ionen hoher energie , \ https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/zna-1975-0810 journal journal Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A \ volume 30 ...

    1975 doi

  47. [56]

    author author T. A. \ Thornton \ and\ author J. N. \ Anno ,\ title title Secondary electron emission from 0.5–2.5‐mev protons and deuterons , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.323809 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 48 ,\ pages 1718--1719 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    doi

  48. [57]

    author author E. V. \ Alonso , author R. A. \ Baragiola , author J. Ferr\'on , author M. M. \ Jakas ,\ and\ author A. Oliva-Florio ,\ title title Z _ 1 dependence of ion-induced electron emission from aluminum , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.22.80 journal journal Phys. Re...

    doi

  49. [58]

    Koyama , author T

    author author A. Koyama , author T. Shikata ,\ and\ author H. Sakairi ,\ title title Secondary electron emission from al, cu, ag and au metal targets under proton bombardment , \ https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.20.65 journal journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 20...

    doi

  50. [59]

    Svensson \ and\ author G

    author author B. Svensson \ and\ author G. Holmén ,\ title title Electron emission from ion‐bombarded aluminum , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328646 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 52 ,\ pages 6928--6933 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    doi

  51. [60]

    author author J. E. \ Borovsky , author D. J. \ McComas ,\ and\ author B. L. \ Barraclough ,\ title title The secondary-electron yield measured for 5–24 mev protons on aluminum-oxide and gold targets , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(88)90116-4 journal jour...

    doi

  52. [61]

    Benka , author A

    author author O. Benka , author A. Schinner , author T. Fink ,\ and\ author M. Pfaffenlehner ,\ title title Electron-emission yield of al, cu, and au for the impact of swift bare light ions , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3959 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 52 ,...

    doi

  53. [62]

    Murdock \ and\ author G

    author author J. Murdock \ and\ author G. Miller ,\ @noop title Secondary electron emission due to positive ion bombardment , \ type Tech. Rep. \ ( institution Ames Laboratory ,\ year 1955 ) NoStop

    1955

  54. [63]

    author author E. Veje ,\ title title Secondary electron emission from gold bombarded with h+, h2+, h3+, he+, and heh+ , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(82)90559-6 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research \ volume 194 ,\ pages 433-...

    doi

  55. [64]

    Lakits , author A

    author author G. Lakits , author A. Arnau ,\ and\ author H. Winter ,\ title title Slow-particle-induced kinetic electron emission from a clean metal surface: A comparison for neutral and ionized projectiles , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.15 journal journal Phys. Rev. ...

    doi

  56. [65]

    Itoh , author T

    author author A. Itoh , author T. Majima , author F. Obata , author Y. Hamamoto ,\ and\ author A. Yogo ,\ title title Secondary electron emission from au by medium energy atomic and molecular ions , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(02)00877-7 journal journa...

    doi

  57. [66]

    Holmén , author B

    author author G. Holmén , author B. Svensson ,\ and\ author A. Burén ,\ title title Ion induced electron emission from polycrystalline copper , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(81)91251-9 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research \ ...

    doi

  58. [67]

    Zalm \ and\ author L

    author author P. Zalm \ and\ author L. Beckers ,\ title title Ion-induced secondary electron emission from copper and zinc , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(85)90136-0 journal journal Surface Science \ volume 152-153 ,\ pages 135--141 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    doi

  59. [68]

    Bogaerts \ and\ author R

    author author A. Bogaerts \ and\ author R. Gijbels ,\ title title The ion- and atom-induced secondary electron emission yield: numerical study for the effect of clean and dirty cathode surfaces , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/11/1/303 journal journal Plasma Sources Scien...

    doi

  60. [69]

    author author A. M. \ Capece , author M. I. \ Patino , author Y. Raitses ,\ and\ author B. E. \ Koel ,\ title title Secondary electron emission from lithium and lithium compounds , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4955461 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 109 ,\ page...

    doi

  61. [70]

    author author J. P. \ Dougherty ,\ title title Model Fokker-Planck Equation for a Plasma and Its Solution , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2746779 journal journal The Physics of Fluids \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1788--1799 ( year 1964 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/...

    1964 doi

  62. [71]

    Francisquez , author T

    author author M. Francisquez , author T. Bernard , author N. Mandell , author G. Hammett ,\ and\ author A. Hakim ,\ title title Conservative discontinuous galerkin scheme of a gyro-averaged dougherty collision operator , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aba0c9 journal journ...

    doi

  63. [72]

    Hakim , author M

    author author A. Hakim , author M. Francisquez , author J. Juno ,\ and\ author G. W. \ Hammett ,\ title title Conservative discontinuous galerkin schemes for nonlinear dougherty–fokker–planck collision operators , \ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377820000586 journal journal Jou...

    doi

  64. [73]

    Li , author B

    author author Y. Li , author B. Srinivasan , author Y. Zhang ,\ and\ author X.-Z. \ Tang ,\ title title Bohm criterion of plasma sheaths away from asymptotic limits , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.085002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 085002...

    doi

  65. [74]

    Li , author B

    author author Y. Li , author B. Srinivasan , author Y. Zhang ,\ and\ author X.-Z. \ Tang ,\ title title Transport physics dependence of bohm speed in presheath–sheath transition , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110379 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 29 ,\ pages 11350...

    doi

  66. [75]

    author author Gkeyll ,\ @noop ( year 2022 ),\ note https://gkeyll.readthedocs.io NoStop

    2022

  67. [76]

    Juno , author A

    author author J. Juno , author A. Hakim , author J. TenBarge , author E. Shi ,\ and\ author W. Dorland ,\ title title Discontinuous galerkin algorithms for fully kinetic plasmas , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.009 journal journal Journal of Computatio...

    doi

  68. [77]

    Hakim \ and\ author J

    author author A. Hakim \ and\ author J. Juno ,\ title title Alias-free, matrix-free, and quadrature-free discontinuous galerkin algorithms for (plasma) kinetic equations , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1109/SC41405.2020.00077 booktitle SC20: International Conference for High Perfor...

    2020 arXiv

  69. [78]

    author author S. Gottlieb ,\ title title On high order strong stability preserving runge-kutta and multi step time discretizations , \ @noop journal journal Journal of scientific computing \ volume 25 ,\ pages 105--128 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  70. [79]

    author author M. D. \ Campanell , author C. Y. \ Wang ,\ and\ author K. L. \ Nguyen ,\ title title Two mechanisms limiting the emitted electron current from a cathode to an anode , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.145301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 134 ,...

    doi

  71. [80]

    Li , author B

    author author Y. Li , author B. Srinivasan , author Y. Zhang ,\ and\ author X.-Z. \ Tang ,\ title title The plasma–sheath transition and bohm criterion in a high recycling divertor , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147580 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 30 ,\ pages 06...

    doi

  72. [81]

    Furman \ and\ author M

    author author M. Furman \ and\ author M. Pivi ,\ title title Probabilistic model for the simulation of secondary electron emission , \ @noop journal journal Physical review special topics-accelerators and beams \ volume 5 ,\ pages 124404 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  73. [82]

    Fernandez-Coppel , author R

    author author J. Fernandez-Coppel , author R. Wirz ,\ and\ author J. Marian ,\ title title Fully discrete model of kinetic ion-induced electron emission from metal surfaces , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0188000 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 135 ,\ pages 0...

    doi

  74. [83]

    Wollenhaupt , author Q

    author author B. Wollenhaupt , author Q. H. \ Le ,\ and\ author G. Herdrich ,\ title title Overview of thermal arcjet thruster development , \ @noop journal journal Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology \ ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  75. [84]

    author author R. R. \ Weynants \ and\ author G. V. \ Oost ,\ title title Edge biasing in tokamaks , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/35/SB/014 journal journal Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion \ volume 35 ,\ pages B177 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.