Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Development and Quality Control of PMT Modules for the Large-Sized Telescopes of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that the seven-pixel photomultiplier modules built for all four Large-Sized Telescopes of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory meet every stated performance specification, with mass production and quality…

desk verdict Thorough, honest QC paper for CTAO LST camera modules; the afterpulsing lifetime claim rests on a deferred long-term study. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02045 v1 pith:EJPVOL25 submitted 2025-02-04 astro-ph.IM physics.ins-det

T. Saito , M. Takahashi , Y. Inome , H. Abe , M. Artero , O. Blanch , J. Becerra González , S. Fukami
show 51 more authors
D. Hadasch Y. Hanabata Y. Hattori J. Herrera Llorente K. Ishio H. Iwasaki H. Katagiri K. Kawamura D. Kerszberg S. Kimura T. Kiyomoto T. Kojima Y. Konno Y. Kobayashi S. Koyama H. Kubo J. Kushida A. López-Oramas S. Masuda S. Matsuoka D. Mazin D. Nakajima T. Nakamori T. Nagayoshi D. Ninci K. Nishijima G. Nishiyama Y. Nogami S. Nozaki M. Ogino H. Ohoka T. Oka S. Ono A. Okumura R. Orito A. Rugliancich S. Sakurai N. Sasaki Y. Sunada M. Suzuki K. Tamura J. Takeda Y. Terada M. Teshima F. Tokanai Y. Tomono S. Tsujimoto Y. Tsukamoto Y. Umetsu T. Yamamoto T. Yoshida
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det
keywords photomultipliertubeCherenkovtelescopecameramodulequalitycontrolafterpulsinglightguideDRS4readoutgamma-rayastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the seven-pixel photomultiplier modules built for the cameras of all four Large-Sized Telescopes pass every stated performance requirement, and that mass production and quality control are finished. The claim matters because these modules determine whether the telescopes can trigger on faint gamma-ray air showers while rejecting night-sky background: pulse width, noise, afterpulsing, linearity, and crosstalk all sit inside their limits. A reader should take away concrete numbers: median pulse widths of 2.8 ns for the first telescope and 2.7 ns for the other three, afterpulsing rates below the $4\times10^{-4}$ acceptance limit for most pixels, and linear response from 4 to 2000 photoelectrons. The authors present this as the completion of the module program for the four northern telescopes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the seven-pixel PMT module, a self-contained unit that converts light into digitized waveforms and triggers. Its parts are a plate of seven non-imaging light guides that concentrate photons onto the tubes; seven PMT units, each combining a photomultiplier with a Cockcroft-Walton high-voltage generator and a PACTA transimpedance preamplifier (1200 $\Omega$ high gain, 80 $\Omega$ low gain); a slow control board that sets high voltage, injects 2.4 ns test pulses, and monitors temperature, humidity, and currents; a readout board using four cascaded DRS4 switched-capacitor arrays per pixel to provide 1.024 GHz sampling with a 4 $\mu$s buffer; and a trigger mezzanine with level-0 summing and level-1 patch-sum ASICs. The quality-control argument runs through a 19-module "mini-camera" that measures gain slope, operating voltage, pulse width, signal-to-noise, afterpulsing, linearity, and crosstalk in about 13 minutes per module, using a fast laser pulser and calibrated filter wheels.

What would settle it

Measure the afterpulsing rate of installed LST-2-4 modules at the operating voltage over several years of operation: if the median rate of pulses above 4 photoelectrons exceeds $4\times10^{-4}$, or if the rate continues the increase seen between the 2020 and 2021 batches, the claim that all requirements are fulfilled for the operational lifetime would be disproved. A shorter-term check is to extend the afterpulse counting window from 2 $\mu$s to about 20 $\mu$s on a reference module; the paper's own estimate of about 10% late afterpulses predicts a measurable excess that directly tests the QC margin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a complete photosensor chain—light guide plate, photomultiplier tube, Cockcroft-Walton high-voltage supply, preamplifier, slow control, readout board, and trigger mezzanine—can be mass-produced and qualified as 1855-pixel cameras while staying inside tight specifications. Qualification passed 2002 of 2019 PMTs for the first telescope and 5652 of 5695 for the other three, yielding 271 and 795 qualified modules respectively. Each module met the requirements: average photon detection efficiency above 15%, pulse FWHM below 3 ns on average and below 3.5 ns for every pixel, afterpulsing above 4 photoelectrons below $4\times10^{-4}$, single-photoelectron signal-to-noise above 4, linearity within 10% from 4 to 2000 photoelectrons, and crosstalk below 1%. The paper states this as the completion of module production for all four LST cameras, with the LST-2-4 afterpulsing rate showing a two-peak distribution because of a nineteen-month gap between production batches.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a module that passed production-time quality control, especially the afterpulsing measurement that only covered the first 2 microseconds while the rate was visibly drifting between batches, will keep meeting the same limits over the observatory's 20-year lifetime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The four northern LST cameras can enter operation with photosensor modules already at specification, grounding the expected energy threshold and trigger performance in measured hardware rather than simulations.
  • The measured Cherenkov photon detection efficiency of 26% for LST-1 and 27% for LST-2-4 exceeds the 15% requirement, providing margin for mirror aging and other optical losses.
  • The combination of 1 GHz sampling, a 4 $\mu$s buffer, and sub-0.25 photoelectron readout noise supports the telescopes' low-energy science goal down to 20 GeV.
  • The low PMT rejection rate and the efficient mini-camera QC method show the modular design can be manufactured reproducibly and exchanged as field-replaceable units.
  • The built-in test-pulse injection and slow-control monitoring allow in-situ calibration of trigger thresholds and homogenization of the camera response during operation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The decisive long-term check is operational afterpulsing monitoring: if the rate resumes the increase seen between the 2020 and 2021 batches, trigger thresholds would need to rise and the "fulfills all requirements" claim would become time-limited.
  • A straightforward extension would be to lengthen the afterpulse counting window beyond 2 $\mu$s; the paper's own estimate that about 10% of afterpulses arrive later means a 10 $\mu$s window would tighten the margin to the $4\times10^{-4}$ limit and reduce the QC systematic bias.
  • The two-peak afterpulse distribution and the nineteen-month production gap suggest that storage conditions, possibly helium ingress into the tubes, drive the increase; controlled-atmosphere storage could suppress this drift.
  • The seven-pixel module with integrated readout and the mini-camera QC procedure could serve as a template for photosensor qualification in other Cherenkov or astroparticle cameras.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports the development, mass production, and quality control of seven-pixel PMT modules for the four LST cameras of CTAO. Each module contains a seven-light-guide plate, seven PMT units with PACTA preamplifiers and Cockcroft-Walton HV supplies, a slow-control board, a DRS4-based readout board, and a trigger mezzanine. The authors list the CTAO requirements (photon detection efficiency, pulse width <3 ns average and <3.5 ns per pixel, gain 40000, afterpulsing rate above 4 p.e. below 4e-4, 1 GHz sampling, 4 us buffer, linearity within 10% from 4 to 2000 p.e., configurable trigger, test-pulse injection, and power budget) and then describe a 19-module mini-camera QC system. They report quantile distributions for gain slope, operation voltage, pulse width, signal-to-noise ratio, afterpulsing, linearity, and crosstalk for both LST-1 and LST-2-4 populations. The conclusion states that all requirements are fulfilled and that 271 qualified modules for LST-1 and 795 for LST-2-4 have been produced.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a significant instrumental milestone: the complete photosensor production for the northern CTAO LSTs, with more than 7000 PMTs characterized in a single QC campaign. The paper's strengths are the full-population quantile tables (Tables 1-5), the reference-module stability checks in Appendix B, and the explicit disclosure of uncorrected systematics (the 800-920 ps laser contribution to pulse width, the -20 V operation-voltage bias, and the approximately 10% afterpulse deficit beyond the 2 us window). These features make the QC results reproducible and testable. The main risk is that the abstract's claim that the modules fulfill all requirements is partly an operational-lifetime claim, while the lifetime evidence for afterpulsing saturation is deferred to another paper. If that point is resolved, the paper will be a useful reference for CTAO operations and for future Cherenkov-camera projects.

major comments (2)
  1. [8.2.5, Table 5, Fig. B.29] The central claim that the modules fulfill the afterpulsing requirement over the observatory lifetime is not supported by the evidence presented in this paper. The requirement in Section 2 is motivated by long-term trigger-threshold stability over a planned operation of more than 20 years, but the QC measures afterpulses only within 2 us, with a stated systematic deficit of about 10% for later afterpulses. The LST-2-4 afterpulsing distribution shifts upward between the 2020 and 2021 QC campaigns (Table 5: median 2.2e-4 and 95th percentile 3.2e-4 against the 4e-4 limit; reference module in Fig. B.29 increases by roughly a factor of two across the 19-month break). The only support for saturation is the closing sentence of Section 8.2.5, which states that a long-term study showed the rate does not keep increasing and defers details to another paper. Since the abstract and Section 9 assert that all requirements are fulfilled, this is load-bearing. Please either include the long-term afterpulsing data and analysis in this paper, or explicitly scope the conclusion to production-time qualification.
  2. [8.1 and 8.2.6] The linearity test has a calibration circularity that should be quantified. The incident-photoelectron axis is constructed from filter opacities calibrated by averaging the PMT charge output of the same 19 modules under test (Section 8.1), and from gains determined in the same QC campaign (Section 8.2.2, which itself carries the -20 V systematic). Any common-mode nonlinearity or gain bias among those modules is therefore partially absorbed into the x-axis, which biases the measured deviations toward the 10% band. The independent test-pulse check reported in footnote 14 verifies the electronic chain only, not the PMT and light-guide response. Please provide a quantitative estimate of this effect, for example by comparing the filter calibration against a separately calibrated photodiode or by using the reference module as a cross-check.
minor comments (5)
  1. [8.3] The qualification-criteria list contains typos: 'operatin voltage' appears twice and 'Crosstallk' should be 'Crosstalk'.
  2. [8.2.5] Please give the exact number of PMTs rejected for exceeding the afterpulsing limit; the text says 'only several' but the qualification counts in Section 8.3 imply a specific number that should be stated.
  3. [References] Reference [32] links to the Analog Devices ADA4927 product page rather than the Xilinx Spartan-6 page; please correct the URL.
  4. [Figure 24] The figure axis is difficult to read because 'Relative Amplitude [%]' and the repeated 'Cross Talk Relative Amplitude' text overlap; please simplify the labeling.
  5. [6] The power-consumption statement says 'about 20.2 W including the SCB and 7 PMTs' but does not explicitly state whether the readout board and trigger mezzanine are included; please clarify, since the requirement is quoted per pixel.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Linearity QC is partly circular: the incident-p.e. axis is calibrated on the same PMT modules being tested, so common-mode nonlinearity is absorbed; remaining requirements are independently verified.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 8.1 and Section 8.2.6 (linearity calibration and measurement)]
    "Before starting the QC measurements, the relative opacities of these filters were calibrated by averaging the PMT charge output from 19 modules with the LD light pulsing... First, we estimated the incident photoelectron number for one specific filter combination... using the gain obtained in Section 8.2.2. Next, we derived the number for the other combinations by dividing this figure by the relative opacity explained in Section 8.1."

    The 'input photoelectron number' axis of the linearity test is built from the output charge of the same PMT modules under test: the filter opacities are defined by the average PMT charge output, and the reference p.e. scale uses the gain measured in the same QC campaign (Section 8.2.2). A nonlinearity shared by all 19 modules is therefore absorbed into the calibration, and the resulting output-versus-input relation is linear by construction for the average response. The test can only detect per-channel deviations from that average, not absolute nonlinearity. The independent test-pulse check (footnote 14) validates the readout chain up to 2000 p.e., not the PMT itself, so it does not remove the circularity.

full rationale

The paper is a production/QC report; most verified requirements (pulse width, S/N, afterpulsing, crosstalk, operation voltage) are measured against independently defined targets and are not circular. The one partial circularity is the linearity QC: the incident-photoelectron axis is calibrated on the same PMT modules whose linearity is being claimed, so common-mode nonlinearity is invisible. This weakens but does not eliminate the 'fulfills all requirements' claim, because the other requirements and the per-channel consistency component of the linearity test remain meaningful. The afterpulsing lifetime extrapolation ('A long-term evolution ... does not keep increasing. The details will be discussed in another paper.') is a deferred-evidence weakness, not a circularity; the same holds for the 2020-2021 rising trend seen in Figure B.29. The self-citations to earlier PMT evaluation papers are corroborative, not load-bearing. Overall circularity is moderate and confined to one QC channel.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on external requirement targets, a simulated reference Cherenkov spectrum, component-level calibrations, and a small-sample light-guide measurement. No new physical entities are introduced. The most fragile elements are the 20-year stability of afterpulsing (deferred to a future paper) and the partly self-referenced linearity scale.

free parameters (4)
  • Single-p.e. response fit parameters (a, mu, sigma, gamma, b, s, alpha, beta) and Poisson mean lambda = Per-tube values; ENF F = 1.107 +/- 0.009 (LST-1)
    Fit to 55002-event charge histograms (Section 4.2, Eqs. 1-5); the 1-p.e. peak position sets the charge-to-p.e. scale used for QC. These are characterization fits, not hidden assumptions of the claim.
  • Gain-vs-voltage power-law parameters (a, p) in a(V-350)^p = p: 4.5-5.0 (LST-1), 3.8-4.1 (LST-2-4), Table 1
    Per-PMT fits in Section 8.2.1 used to set operation voltages; the 350 V term is the Zener-fixed first-dynode voltage, not a fitted constant.
  • Relative opacities of 36 filter-wheel combinations = Calibrated values, not tabulated
    Section 8.1: calibrated using the average PMT output of the same 19 modules under test; the linearity test's input scale is therefore not independent of the device being qualified, mitigated by choosing reference settings in the linear regime.
  • Operation-voltage calibration constant (single-p.e. mean of 93.7 ADC counts) = 93.7 ADC counts
    Section 8.2.2: a chosen calibration convention tying the measured 1-p.e. mean to the design gain of 40000 through the amplification chain; a design convention, not a data fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The CTAO requirement targets (15% PDE, <3 ns FWHM pulse, gain 40000, afterpulsing <4e-4, dynamic range 0.25-2000 p.e., 4 us buffer, 3 W/pixel) are the correct external specifications.
    Taken from CTA internal requirement document [4]; the central 'fulfills all requirements' claim inherits these targets without re-deriving them.
  • domain assumption Camera photon detection efficiency equals the product of mirror reflectivity (~90%), light-guide collection efficiency (84-88%), window transmittance, and measured QE.
    Section 4.2: the 26% (LST-1) and 27% (LST-2-4) PDE claims are a multiplication of component values; assumes no unaccounted losses and that HPK QE values for a subset of tubes represent all installed tubes.
  • domain assumption The reference Cherenkov spectrum (zenith 20 degrees, 2200 m altitude) correctly weights the PDE and NSB efficiency integrals.
    Figure 2 and Section 2: the efficiency numbers depend on this simulated spectrum and the 300-550 nm integration band.
  • domain assumption The simulated afterpulsing result, that energy threshold does not worsen when the >=4 p.e. afterpulse rate is below 4e-4, is valid.
    Section 2: the QC acceptance threshold inherits an external LST-array simulation that is only briefly described in the paper.
  • domain assumption Light-guide RAS measurements on 5 (LST-1) and 4 (LST-2-4) units are representative of all produced light guides.
    Figure 6 and Section 3: total collection efficiencies of 84% and 88% are derived from a small sample of light guides.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Development and Quality Control of PMT Modules for the Large-Sized Telescopes of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EJPVOL25

@misc{pith2026250202045,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Development and Quality Control of PMT Modules for the Large-Sized Telescopes of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EJPVOL25}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02045}
}
read the original abstract

The camera of the Large-Sized Telescopes (LSTs) of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) consists of 1855 pixels that are grouped into 265 high-performance photomultiplier tube (PMT) modules. Each module comprises a seven-light-guide plate, seven PMT units, a slow control board, and a readout board with a trigger board. %In this paper we describe The requirements for the PMT modules include various aspects, such as photon detection efficiency, dynamic range, buffer depth, and test pulse functionality. We have developed a high-performance PMT module that fulfills all these requirements. Mass-production and quality control (QC) of modules for all four LSTs of the northern CTAO have been completed. Here we report on the technical details of each element of the module and its performance, together with the methods and results of QC measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02045 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Photos of the PMT module. The front side (top) and the back side [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Quantum efficiency spectrum of PMT R11920-100 (blue) for LST-1 and R12992-100 (orange) for LST-2–4, respectively, which are averaged over tubes. The former and latter were measured for 270 nm–600 nm and 270 nm– 750 nm, respectively. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the distribution. Solid green curve is that of MAGIC-II PMTs [6]. Dotted magenta curve is a Cherenkov photon spectrum simulated for gamm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A diagram illustrating the need of 4 µs buffer. Arrival time difference of Cherenkov light between the two telescopes can be as large as 560 ns. It takes roughly 150 ns to transfer the trigger signal inside the camera. Path length of the trigger fibers along the telescope is about 850 ns, while it is up to 1200 ns between the telescopes. Dynamic range and linearity To discriminate one-photoelectron signal from elect… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A schematic figure of the required viewing angle of LGs at the center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (The photo of the 7-LG plate attached to the PMT module [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative anode sensitivities (RASs) measured in a laboratory. RAS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Photo of PMTs with and without the aluminum tube. The Cockcroft [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Typical pulse shape of PMT R11920-100 (Blue; 8-Dy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distribution of the peak QE of PMT R11920-100 (blue; 1987 tubes) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Black squares (Red circles): Average of the single-photoelectron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top:Pulse shape of test pulses injected from the SCB to the readout board. FWHM is about 2.4 ns.Bottom Linearity of the test pulse. It can be injected to both high and low gain readout channel. The amplitude can be varied by 4 orders of magnitude (80 in dB). 6. Readou…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Photos of the SCB. Both the PMT side and the readout board side [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Trigger rate as a function of the level-1 discriminator (L1 rate scans) for increasing amplitudes indicated by increasing gain of the test pulse (see section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: left: Overview of the components of the Mini-camera setup and their communication. top right: Picture of the module rack with 19 modules mounted. bottom right: Physical arrangement of 19 modules held by the rack in a front view. The pixels that are assembled into one …
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Distribution of the PMT operation voltage. The solid and dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_18.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Distribution of the power-law fit slope of the gain-vs.-voltage curve. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_17.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Distribution of the PMT pulse width (FWHM). The solid and dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Distribution of S/N of the PMT modules. The blue solid and or￾ange dashed lines represent the LST-1 and LST-2–4 modules, respectively. The scale for each of them is shown in the same way as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Distribution of the PMT afterpulse (AP; ≥ 4 p.e.) rate. The blue solid and orange dashed lines represent the LST-1 and LST-2–4 modules, re￾spectively. The scale for each of them is shown in the same way as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Output of the PMT modules in photoelectrons against the input pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_22.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Distribution of relative cross talk amplitude for 265 boards. Both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_24.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Linearity of the PMT modules. The ordinate represents distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_23.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. C. Weekes, M. F. Cawley, D. J. Fegan, K. G. Gibbs, A. M. Hillas, P. W. Kowk, R. C. Lamb, D. A. Lewis, D. Macomb, N. A. Porter, P. T. Reynolds, G. Vacanti, Observation of TeV Gamma Rays from the Crab Nebula Using the Atmospheric Cerenkov Imaging Technique, ApJ 342 (1989) 379. doi:10.1086/167599. 0 10 20 30 40 50 QC cycle 0.00000 0.00005 0.00010 0.00015 ...

    doi:10.1086/167599 1989

  2. [2]

    Wakely, D

    S. Wakely, D. Horan, TeVCat, http://tevcat.uchicago.edu/

    work page

  3. [3]

    L. A. Tejedor, J. A. Barrio, P. Pe ˜nil, A. P ´erez, D. Herranz, J. Mart ´ın, A trigger interface board for the large and medium sized telescopes of the cherenkov telescope array, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics 18 Figure B.31: Linearity of the reference PMT module. Red squares and green circles represent the high- and low-gain channels, respec...

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    ”Performance Requirements for CTA”, internal Notes, CTA Ref: MAN- PO/121004

    work page

  5. [5]

    C. Benn, S. Ellison, Brightness of the night sky over la palma, New As- tronomy Reviews 42 (6) (1998) 503–507. doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/S1387-6473(98)00062-1 . URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1387647398000621

    work page 1998

  6. [7]

    C. Hsu, D. Fink, J. Hose, R. Mirzoyan, O. Reimann, M. Shayduk, M. Teshima, PMT characterization for the MAGIC-II telescope, Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelera- tors, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 610 (1) (2009) 267–270, new Developments In Photodetection NDIP08. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.nima...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.05.175 2009

  7. [8]

    E. C. Hamamatsu Photonics K. K., PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES – Basics and Applications–, 4th Edition, Hamamatsu Photonics K. K., Elec- tron Tube Devision, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [9]

    Okumura, T

    A. Okumura, T. Dang, S. Ono, S. Tanaka, M. Hayashida, J. Hinton, H. Katagiri, K. Noda, M. Teshima, T. Yamamoto, T. Yoshida, Prototyping hexagonal light concentrators using high-reflectance specular films for the large-sized telescopes of the cherenkov telescope array, Journal of Instru- mentation 12 (12) (2017) P12008–P12008. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/ 12/12/...

    doi:10.1088/1748-0221/ 2017

Show all 41 references
  1. [10]

    Okumura, Optimization of the collection e fficiency of a hexagonal light collector using quadratic and cubic B ´ezier curves, Astroparticle Physics 38 (0) (2012) 18–24

    A. Okumura, Optimization of the collection e fficiency of a hexagonal light collector using quadratic and cubic B ´ezier curves, Astroparticle Physics 38 (0) (2012) 18–24. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys. 2012.08.008. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0927650512001624

    2012 doi

  2. [11]

    Okumura, K

    A. Okumura, K. Noda, C. Rulten, ROBAST: Development of a ROOT- based ray-tracing library for cosmic-ray telescopes and its applications in the Cherenkov Telescope Array, Astroparticle Physics 76 (2016) 38–

    2016

  3. [12]

    J. D. Cockcroft, E. T. S. Walton, Experiments with hgh velocity positive ions.–(i) further developments in the method of obtaining high velocity positive ions., Proceedings of the Royal Society A 136. URL https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10. 1098/rspa.1932.0107

  4. [13]

    Yoshizawa, H

    Y . Yoshizawa, H. Yamaguchi, N. Ooishi, H. Suzuki, S. Suzuki, The study of countrate stability of photomultiplier tube with different types of volt- age dividers, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 43 (3) (1996) 1656–

    1996

  5. [14]

    Mirzoyan, D

    R. Mirzoyan, D. M ¨uller, Y . Hanabata, J. Hose, U. Menzel, D. Nakajima, M. Takahashi, M. Teshima, T. Toyama, T. Yamamoto, Evaluation of photo multiplier tube candidates for the cherenkov telescope array, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerat...

    2016

  6. [15]

    Mirzoyan, D

    R. Mirzoyan, D. M ¨uller, J. Hose, U. Menzel, D. Nakajima, M. Taka- hashi, M. Teshima, T. Toyama, T. Yamamoto, Evaluation of novel pmts of worldwide best parameters for the cta project, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrome- ter...

    2017 doi

  7. [16]

    Nakamura, Y

    K. Nakamura, Y . Hamana, Y . Ishigami, T. Matsui, Latest bialkali pho- tocathode with ultra high sensitivity, Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, De- tectors and Associated Equipment 623 (1) (2010) 276–278, 1st Interna-...

    2010 doi

  8. [17]

    Mirzoyan, M

    R. Mirzoyan, M. Laatiaoui, M. Teshima, Very high quantum e fficiency PMTs with bialkali photo-cathode, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 567 (1) (2006) 230–232, proceedings of the 4th ...

    2006 doi

  9. [18]

    Toyama, Y

    T. Toyama, Y . Hanabata, J. Hose, U. Menzel, R. Mirzoyan, D. Nakajima, M. Takahashi, M. Teshima, T. Yamamoto, Evaluation of the basic proper- tied of the novel 1.5in. size PMTs from Hamamatsu Photonics and Elec- tron Tubes Enterprises, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physic...

    2015 doi

  10. [19]

    Toyama, R

    T. Toyama, R. Mirzoyan, H. Dickinson, C. Fruck, J. Hose, H. Kellermann, M. Knotig, E. Lorenz, U. Menzel, D. Nakajima, R. Orito, D. Paneque, T. Schweizer, M. Teshima, T. Yamamoto, Novel Photo Multiplier Tubes for the Cherenkov Telescope Array Project, in: International Cosmic R...

    2013

  11. [20]

    Mirzoyan, On the Calibration Accuracy of Light Sensors in Atmo- spheric Cherenkov Fluorescence and Neutrino Experiments, in: Interna- tional Cosmic Ray Conference, V ol

    R. Mirzoyan, On the Calibration Accuracy of Light Sensors in Atmo- spheric Cherenkov Fluorescence and Neutrino Experiments, in: Interna- tional Cosmic Ray Conference, V ol. 7 of International Cosmic Ray Con- ference, 1997, p. 265

    1997

  12. [21]

    Sanuy, D

    A. Sanuy, D. Gascon, J. M. Paredes, L. Garrido, M. Rib ´o, J. Sieiro, Wideband (500 MHz) 16 bit dynamic range current mode PreAmplifier for the CTA cameras (PACTA), Journal of Instrumentation 7 (01) (2012) C01100–C01100. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/01/c01100. URL https://doi.org/1...

    2012 doi

  13. [22]

    Mirzoyan, F

    R. Mirzoyan, F. Goebel, J. Hose, C. C. Hsu, J. Ninkovi ´c, D. Paneque, A. Rudert, M. Teshima, Enhanced quantum efficiency bialkali photo mul- tiplier tubes, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sec- tion A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated E...

    2007 doi

  14. [23]

    Tsiahina, P

    A. Tsiahina, P. Jean, J. F. Olive, J. Kn ¨odlseder, C. Marty, T. Ravel, C. Jarnot, B. Biasuzzi, J. Bolmont, F. Brun, S. Caroff, E. Delagnes, S. Fe- gan, G. Fontaine, D. Gascon, J. F. Glicenstein, D. Ho ffmann, S. Karkar, J. P. Lenain, J. Paredes, P. O. Petrucci, J. Prast, M. R...

    2021 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Takahashi, Y

    M. Takahashi, Y . Inome, S. Yoshii, A. Bamba, S. Gunji, D. Hadasch, M. Hayashida, H. Katagiri, Y . Konno, H. Kubo, J. Kushida, D. Naka- jima, T. Nakamori, T. Nagayoshi, K. Nishijima, S. Nozaki, D. Mazin, S. Mashuda, R. Mirzoyan, H. Ohoka, R. Orito, T. Saito, S. Sakurai, J. Tak...

    2018

  16. [25]

    I. R. King, Accuracy of measurement of star images on a pixel array., Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 95 (564) (1983)

    1983

  17. [26]

    Ackermann, M

    M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, A. Allafort, K. Asano, W. B. Atwood, L. Bal- dini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, K. Bechtol, R. Bellazzini, E. D. Bloom, E. Bonamente, A. W. Borgland, E. Bottacini, T. J. Brandt, J. Bre- geon, M. Brigida, P. Bruel, R. Buehler, T. H. Burnett, ...

    2013

  18. [27]

    URL https://www.analog.com/en/products/ada4927-2.html

    Analog Device ADA4927. URL https://www.analog.com/en/products/ada4927-2.html

  19. [28]

    S. Ritt, R. Dinapoli, U. Hartmann, Application of the DRS chip for fast waveform digitizing, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Re- search A 623 (1) (2010) 486–488. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.03. 045

    2010 doi

  20. [29]

    J. Sitarek, et al., Analysis techniques and performance of the Domino Ring Sampler version 4 based readout for the MAGIC telescopes, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 723 (2013) 109–120. arXiv:1305.1007, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.014

    2013 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Biland, et al., Calibration and performance of the photon sensor re- sponse of FACT — the first G-APD Cherenkov telescope, Journal of Instrumentation 9 (10) (2014) P10012

    A. Biland, et al., Calibration and performance of the photon sensor re- sponse of FACT — the first G-APD Cherenkov telescope, Journal of Instrumentation 9 (10) (2014) P10012. arXiv:1403.5747, doi:10. 1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10012

    2014 arXiv

  22. [31]

    URL https://www.analog.com/en/products/ad9637.html

    Analog Device AD9637. URL https://www.analog.com/en/products/ad9637.html

  23. [32]

    URL https://www.analog.com/en/products/ada4927-2.html

    Xilinx, Spartan-6. URL https://www.analog.com/en/products/ada4927-2.html

  24. [33]

    Uchida, Hardware-Based TCP Processor for Gigabit Ethernet, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 55 (3) (2008) 1631–1637

    T. Uchida, Hardware-Based TCP Processor for Gigabit Ethernet, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 55 (3) (2008) 1631–1637. doi:10. 1109/TNS.2008.920264

    2008

  25. [34]

    S. Nozaki, et al., Development and readout performance of the readout electronics based on the Domino Ring Sampler version 4 for the Large- Sized Telescope of the Cherenkov Telescope Array, in preparation

  26. [35]

    L. A. Tejedor, M. Barcel ´o, J. Boix, D. Herranz, G. Mart ´ınez, J. A. Bar- rio, O. Blanch Bigas, C. Delgado, R. L ´opez, An Analog Trigger Sys- tem for Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope Arrays, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 60 (3) (2013) 2367–2375. doi:10.1109/TNS.2013. 2257852

    2013 doi

  27. [36]

    Gascon, J

    D. Gascon, J. Barrio, O. Blanch, J. Boix, E. Delagnes, C. Delgado, L. Freixas, F. Guilloux, R. Coto, S. Gri ffiths, G. Mart´ınez, O. Mart´ınez, A. Sanuy, L. Tejedor, Reconfigurable ASIC for a low level trigger sys- tem in cherenkov telescope cameras, Journal of Instrumentation...

    2016 doi

  28. [37]

    Barrio, O

    J. Barrio, O. Blanch, J. Boix, E. Delagnes, C. Delgado, L. F. Coromina, D. Gasc ´on, F. Guilloux, R. L. Coto, G. Mart ´ınez, A. Sanuy, L. Teje- dor, Analogue sum ASIC for L1 trigger decision in Cherenkov Telescope cameras, Journal of Instrumentation 10 (02) (2015) C02016–C0201...

    2015 doi

  29. [38]

    Inome, T

    Y . Inome, T. Yamamoto, M. Teshima, H. Ohoka, D. Nakajima, R. Mir- zoyan, Development of a hundred-picoseconds pulse laser as a calibration source, in: 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2017, pp. 1–2. doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2017. 8533096. 20

    2017 doi

  30. [47]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.12. 003. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0927650515001735

    2015 doi

  31. [54]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/54

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/54. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/54

    doi

  32. [163]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/131139

    doi:10.1086/131139. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/131139

    doi

  33. [1660]

    doi:10.1109/23.507165

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.