Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The Spectrum of Global Axion Strings

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts the QCD axion dark matter mass at 95–450 μeV from the spectrum of axions radiated by global cosmic strings, and argues this range will be probed by next-generation haloscopes.

desk verdict Honest proceedings summary of a solid simulation campaign; the headline mass range is an envelope of extrapolated fits, not a sharp prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02398 v2 pith:APWAEQKV submitted 2025-02-04 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Mathieu Kaltschmidt , Javier Redondo , Ken'ichi Saikawa , Alejandro Vaquero This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords QCDaxiondarkmatterglobalcosmicstringsstringnetworkspectralindexPeccei-Quinnsymmetrybreakinglatticesimulationhaloscopesearches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In the post-inflationary Peccei-Quinn scenario—where the axion's symmetry breaks after inflation and necessarily leaves a network of global cosmic strings—the axions radiated when strings decay would today be the dark matter. This paper tries to make that production channel yield a sharp mass prediction by measuring the axion emission spectrum in large numerical simulations. It catalogs systematic effects that earlier work under-reported: dependence on initial conditions, contamination from oscillating fields in the spectrum, and lattice discretisation, all of which bias the extracted spectral index. After correcting for these and extrapolating to the cosmological string tension, it predicts the axion dark matter mass lies between $95\,\mu\text{eV}$ and $450\,\mu\text{eV}$ (Eq. 14). If right, the QCD axion in this scenario sits directly in the band next-generation haloscopes are being built to scan.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the dimensionless instantaneous axion emission spectrum $F(x,y)$ defined in Eq. (6), together with its spectral index $q$ from the power-law ansatz of Eq. (9). The decisive mechanism is the split in Eq. (10), $q = q_{\rm model}(\ell) + q_{\rm disc}(\ell, m_r a)$, which separates the physical late-time evolution from the lattice-core artifact controlled by $m_r a$; the four fitted models A–D in Eq. (11) are how the paper handles the extrapolation in $\ell$. The string density enters through the attractor equation $d\xi/dt = (C/t)(\xi_c(\ell) - \xi)$, calibrated on conformal networks, which determines how many strings radiate. These ingredients feed the axion number density (Eq. 12), the production-efficiency factor $K = n^{\rm str}_a/n^{\rm mis}_a$, and the matching condition $\Omega_a h^2 = K \Omega^{\rm mis}_a h^2 = 0.12$ that fixes $m_a$.

What would settle it

Run a sufficiently large adaptive-mesh-refinement simulation that reaches $\ln(m_r/H) \gtrsim 12$ with controlled core resolution and measure $q(\ell)$ directly; if the measured late-time spectral index deviates from all four model extrapolations by more than the stated uncertainty, the mass band in Eq. (14) shifts. A complementary check is an axion search with sufficient sensitivity that finds no axion across the entire 95–450 $\mu$eV range, which would contradict the claim that string-produced axions are all of the dark matter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the axion mass produced by global string decay is $95\,\mu\text{eV} \lesssim m_a \lesssim 450\,\mu\text{eV}$. The argument proceeds through the instantaneous emission spectrum $F(x,y)$, modeled as a power law $F = F_0 x^{-q}$ on $x_0 < x < y$, with $q$ the spectral index that decides whether the axion population is soft-dominated or hard-dominated. The paper decomposes $q$ into a late-time physical model $q_{\rm model}(\ell)$ plus a discretisation correction $q_{\rm disc}(\ell, m_r a)$ (Eq. 10), fits four functional forms (A–D) for $q_{\rm model}$, and confirms an attractor evolution for the string density $\xi$ whose extrapolation to $\ell = \ln(f_a/H) \approx 70$ gives $\xi \sim 7$ to $13.8$. Feeding these into the number-density integral (Eq. 12) and matching $\Omega_a h^2 = 0.12$ yields the mass band in Eq. (14).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the four fitted models for how the spectral index $q(\ell)$ changes at late times, together with the discretisation correction $q_{\rm disc}(\ell, m_r a)$, remain valid when extrapolated from the simulated range $\ln(m_r/H)\approx 3$ to 9 out to the cosmological value $\ell = \ln(f_a/H)\approx 70$; a different bend in $q$ outside the simulated range moves the mass band in Eq. (14).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The post-inflationary PQ axion becomes discoverable in a defined decade-wide mass window: experiments such as FLASH, IAXO, RADES, ADMX, and QUAX can cover the lower half of the 95–450 $\mu$eV range, while ALPHA, MADMAX, and ORGAN target the upper half.
  • The predicted range gives haloscope searches a concrete frequency band of roughly 23–109 GHz, so experimental programs can prioritize cavity designs and magnet volumes for that band.
  • Earlier simulations spread over a few to roughly 1000 $\mu$eV; the systematic catalog here attributes that spread to identifiable biases, implying future lattice studies that control the same effects should converge to a common spectral index.
  • If the extrapolated string density $\xi \sim 7$ to $13.8$ at $\ell=70$ is correct, string decay contributes substantially more axions than the misalignment mechanism, making the string channel the dominant source of axion dark matter in this scenario.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A purely numerical test of the extrapolation is available now: rerun the same physical initial conditions with adaptive mesh refinement to push $\ln(m_r/H)$ toward 12 or beyond and see whether the directly measured $q(\ell)$ follows any of the four models A–D; if the best late-time model changes, the 95–450 $\mu$eV band should shift.
  • The same $\ell$-extrapolation logic applies to other global topological defects whose energy diverges logarithmically, such as global monopoles and domain walls, so the correction scheme may carry over to their emission spectra.
  • A detection inside this band would not by itself prove the string-production picture, but a null result across the entire 95–450 $\mu$eV band would make it hard to sustain the post-inflationary PQ explanation of all the dark matter under the stated cosmological assumptions.
  • The claim that $\xi$ keeps growing to roughly 7–14 at $\ell=70$ extends the conformal-network attractor to parametrically large $\ell$; simulations with much larger scale separation could confirm or break that extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This proceedings paper reports large-scale static-lattice simulations of global axion strings and uses them to predict the QCD axion dark-matter mass. The authors model the string-density attractor (Eqs. 3-4), define the instantaneous axion emission spectrum F(x) (Eqs. 6-9), and fit its spectral index q as q_model(ℓ)+q_disc(ℓ,m_r a) (Eq. 10) with four empirical late-time ansätze (Eq. 11). Combining these with the production efficiency K (Eq. 13) and the observed dark-matter abundance, they obtain the mass range 95 μeV ≲ m_a ≲ 450 μeV (Eq. 14), which overlaps next-generation haloscope sensitivity. The paper also discusses systematic effects—initial conditions, spectral oscillations, and discretisation—that may explain discrepancies with earlier work.

Significance. If correct, this prediction would focus experimental axion searches on a well-motivated μeV band. The paper deserves credit for a large numerical campaign, for identifying and quantifying the string-density attractor, for explicitly isolating discretisation and oscillation contaminations, and for propagating uncertainties in q, ξ, x0, and n_QCD into the final band (Fig. 3). However, the quoted range is obtained from fitted functional forms that are extrapolated far beyond the simulated dynamical range; it is a model-dependent extrapolation rather than a first-principles derivation. The value of the paper lies in the systematic treatment and in making the extrapolation transparent, not in a proof of Eq. (14) as it stands.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Eq. (11); §6, Eq. (14)] The central mass prediction is the envelope of empirical forms for q_model fitted at ℓ≈3–9 and extended to ℓ≈70. Eq. (11) lists four ansätze, yet Fig. 3 reports the mass extrapolation only for two of them (q0+q1ℓ and q0+q1/ℓ², each with ξlin/ξsat); it is unclear whether models B and C are used at all and how the quoted 95–450 μeV spread was selected. Because K in Eq. (12) is strongly sensitive to q through the spectrum F∼x^{-q}, and because the text itself identifies AMR as a 'possible next step' (Sec. 6), Eq. (14) should be reframed as the spread of model choices, or supported by an independent handle on q at large ℓ.
  2. [§4, Eq. (10)] The discretisation correction q_disc(ℓ,m_r a) has an exponential form whose fitted constants d_i are not given, and the simulations reach values m_r a ≳ 1 near the end of the runs while the physical limit is m_r a → 0. The text admits that the final spectra are visibly distorted by discretisation, so it is not demonstrated that the exponential fit, rather than real physical evolution of q, is absorbing the late-time rise. The authors should show stability of the q_model extrapolation under variation of lattice spacing at fixed ℓ, or cross-check with AMR or PRS-type simulations, before Eq. (14) can be considered robust.
  3. [§3, Eq. (5); §5, Fig. 3] The attractor extrapolation itself contributes a factor-of-two spread: ξlin(70)≈13.8(5) versus ξsat(70)≈7(3). Figure 3 appears to include both ξ models, but the paper does not state whether the final band in Eq. (14) is a combined envelope over all q models and ξ models or only over selected combinations. Since K and m_a depend directly on the string density, the selection criterion for the models entering Eq. (14) should be explicit.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2] There are several typos: "apparant" should be "apparent", "instanteneous" should be "instantaneous", "casted" should be "cast", and "proclaimend" should be "proclaimed".
  2. [§4, Fig. 2] The legend in the right panel of Fig. 2 appears to show only three of the four q_model curves listed in Eq. (11); the q0+q1ℓ² model is missing from the legend, which makes it harder to see which models enter the final analysis.
  3. [§5, Eq. (12)] Equation (12) uses τ and τ′ without defining the integration domain or the origin of the τ-dependent prefactor; a reader unfamiliar with Ref. [1] cannot reproduce the integral from this text alone.
  4. [§5, Fig. 3] The uncertainty bands in Fig. 3 are labeled by source (q, ξ, x0, n_QCD), but the text does not explain how these sources are combined into the final quoted range in Eq. (14).
  5. [§2] The statement that the simulation code is available on GitHub is helpful, but the paper does not specify the version or provide a reproducibility record; if space permits, a simulation metadata table (lattice size, m_r a range, run times) would strengthen the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the mass band is a fitted numerical extrapolation with propagated uncertainties, not an input recycled as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is explicit: the spectral index q and the string density are fitted to lattice simulations (Eqs. 4, 10, 11); the spectrum F ~ x^{-q} enters the physically independent number-density integral Eq. (12); K is defined relative to the misalignment estimate in Eq. (13); and the axion mass is solved from the external condition Ω_a h^2 = 0.12. No parameter in the fit is defined in terms of the claimed 95–450 μeV mass range, and the mass is not an input to the simulations. The four models in Eq. (11) are openly labeled fits, and their extrapolation spread is propagated as an uncertainty band rather than being disguised as a unique theoretical prediction. The self-citations, notably to the authors' own earlier paper [1] for the simulations and figures and to [18,19] for the code, supply methodology and data; they do not import the target result. The acknowledged limitations, such as m_r a not reaching the continuum limit and AMR being deferred to future work in Section 6, are extrapolation risks rather than indications that the output is built into the input. Therefore no circular step meeting the quoted-exhibit standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is built on a chain of fitted functional forms (xi_c, q_model, q_disc) plus the assumption that power-law spectra and attractor dynamics seen at low ell remain valid at ell = 70. No new physical entity is introduced; the burden is in the extrapolation functions and the assumed cosmological scenario.

free parameters (5)
  • q0, q1 (spectral index evolution) = model-dependent, not quoted in proceedings
    Fitted to simulated q(ell) values in Fig. 2; the final mass extrapolation in Eqs. (12)-(13) depends directly on these parameters.
  • d0, d1, d2, d3 (discretisation correction) = not quoted
    Constants in q_disc(ell, m_r a) in Eq. (10), fitted to lattice data; they capture the m_r a and Laplacian-resolution bias toward larger q.
  • xi_c linear and saturated coefficients = linear: -0.19(3), 0.205(7); saturated: -0.25(15), 0.23(6), 0.02(4)
    Fitted to conformal network data of Ref. [21] and used in Eq. (4) to extrapolate the string density to ell = 70.
  • x0 (spectral IR cutoff) = not quoted
    Lower edge of the power-law band F = F0 x^{-q} in Eq. (9); the mass integral (Eq. 12) is sensitive to x0, and Fig. 3 propagates its uncertainty.
  • C (attractor relaxation coefficient) = not quoted
    Time-scale parameter in Eq. (3), modified to C(x) in two fit models; it affects how quickly xi approaches xi_c and therefore the density used in the extrapolation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The QCD axion is the dark matter and is produced in the post-inflationary Peccei-Quinn scenario through misalignment plus string decay.
    Sets the framework for the entire mass prediction; invoked in Sections 1 and 5.
  • domain assumption Global string networks enter a scaling regime with O(few) strings per Hubble patch, so the IR cutoff c_IR is of order H^{-1}.
    Used in Eq. (2) for the string tension and in the extrapolation to ell about 70 in Section 2.
  • ad hoc to paper The instantaneous axion emission spectrum has the power-law form F = F0 x^{-q} with hard cutoffs.
    Core modeling assumption in Eq. (9); the spectral index q is extracted by fitting this form to simulation spectra.
  • ad hoc to paper The attractor equation dxi/dt = (C/t)(xi_c - xi) and the specific xi_c(ell) fits describe the network density evolution.
    Eqs. (3)-(4); used to separate initial-condition dependence from the physical evolution of the string network.
  • ad hoc to paper The late-time spectral index follows one of four ansaetze q = q0 + q1 ell, q0 + q1 ell^2, q0 + q1/ell, or q0 + q1/ell^2, with the discretisation correction of Eq. (10).
    Eq. (11); the final mass range is the spread of these fitted extrapolations, so the claim depends on these unproven functional forms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Spectrum of Global Axion Strings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/APWAEQKV

@misc{pith2026250202398,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Spectrum of Global Axion Strings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/APWAEQKV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02398}
}
abstract

The post-inflationary Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symmetry breaking scenario provides a unique opportunity to pinpoint the QCD axion dark matter mass, which is a crucial input for laboratory experiments that are designed for probing specific mass ranges. Predicting their mass requires a precise knowledge of how axions are produced from the decay of topological defects in the early Universe that are inevitably formed. In this contribution, we present recent results on the analysis of the spectrum of axions radiated from global strings based on large scale numerical simulations of the cosmological evolution of the PQ field on a static lattice. We highlight several systematic effects that have been overlooked in previous works, such as the dependence on the initial conditions, contaminations due to oscillations in the spectrum, and discretisation effects; some of which could explain the discrepancy in the current literature. Taking these uncertainties into account and performing the extrapolation to cosmologically relevant string tensions, we find that the dark matter mass is predicted to be in the range of $95\,\mu\text{eV} \lesssim m_a \lesssim 450 \, \mu\text{eV}$, which will be probed by some of the next generation direct detection experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02398 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Evolution of the string density 𝜉 for different initial densities (simulations with 𝑁 3 = 20483 grid sites) and for the largest simulations (𝑁 3 = 112683 ) using initial conditions close to the attractor 𝜉 ≈ 0.3 (black dashed line). Right: Comparison of the string density evolution with the results of Refs. [13, 14]. Figures from Ref. [1]. 4. Axion Spectrum In modern terminology, the axion radiation from strin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Instantaneous axion emission spectrum F (𝑥) for different times during the evolution. The increased distortion of the spectrum due to discretization effects is clearly visible for the last spectrum (purple). Right: Evolution of the spectral index 𝑞 with fits compared to the results of Refs. [13, 14]. Figures from Ref. [1]. effects that, besides the choice of initial conditions discussed in the previous section… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Result for the different extrapolations of the numerical parameter 𝐾, that quantifies the axion production from topological defects over the standard misalignement production. Right: Extrapolation of the axion dark matter mass for the different models. Figures from Ref. [1]. of the spectral index give reasonable fits to the simulation data, namely: A: 𝑞model = 𝑞0 + 𝑞1ℓ (𝑞1 > 0), B: 𝑞model = 𝑞0 + 𝑞1ℓ 2 (𝑞1 > 0)… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of predictions for the axion dark matter mass from string simulations in the post￾inflationary scenario. The figure is adapted from Ref. [1] (result highlighted in red) and updated with the latest results from Refs. [16, 17]. The original template is courtesy …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spectrum of radiation from global strings and the relic axion density

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A wiggling global string's axion spectrum is exponential (P_n ∝ e^{-rn}, r≈2.5–2.9) after self-field removal, implying network-simulation hard spectra may be contaminated and a heavier axion dark matter candidate.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass,

    K. Saikawa, J. Redondo, A. Vaquero, and M. Kaltschmidt, “Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 no. 10, (Oct, 2024) 043,arXiv:2401.17253

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Cosmology of axion dark matter,

    C. A. J. O’Hare, “Cosmology of axion dark matter,”PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040, arXiv:2403.17697 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    The landscape of QCD axion models,

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, “The landscape of QCD axion models,” Phys. Rept.870 (2020) 1–117,arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, “New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102 (2018) 89–159,arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  6. [6]

    Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  7. [7]

    A New Light Boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226. 8 The Spectrum of Global Axion Strings Mathieu Kaltschmidt

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    Problem of Strong𝑃 and𝑇 Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of Strong𝑃 and𝑇 Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 279–282

    work page 1978

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Cosmic Axions from Cosmic Strings,

    R. L. Davis, “Cosmic Axions from Cosmic Strings,”Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 225–230

    1986

  2. [10]

    WISPy Cold Dark Matter,

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, “WISPy Cold Dark Matter,”JCAP06(2012) 013,arXiv:1201.5902 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,

    T. W. B. Kibble, “Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,”J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387–1398

    1976

  4. [12]

    Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution,

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, “Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution,” JHEP07 (2018) 151,arXiv:1806.04677 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    More axions from strings,

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, “More axions from strings,”SciPost Phys.10 no. 2, (2021) 050,arXiv:2007.04990 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement,

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D. E. Willcox, W. Zhang, and B. R. Safdi, “Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement,”Nature Commun.13 no. 1, (2022) 1049,arXiv:2108.05368 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Comment on

    M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, and J. Urrestilla, “Comment on ”More Axions from Strings”,”arXiv:2109.09679 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Axion dark matter from cosmic string network,

    H. Kim, J. Park, and M. Son, “Axion dark matter from cosmic string network,”JHEP07 (2024) 150,arXiv:2402.00741 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Axion mass prediction from adaptive mesh refinement cosmological lattice simulations,

    J. N. Benabou, M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, and B. R. Safdi, “Axion mass prediction from adaptive mesh refinement cosmological lattice simulations,”arXiv:2412.08699 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    jaxions: Simulating the Axion Dark Matter Field in the Post-Inflationary Scenario,

    A. Vaquero, J. Redondo, K. Saikawa, M. Kaltschmidt, and G. Pierobon, “jaxions: Simulating the Axion Dark Matter Field in the Post-Inflationary Scenario,”.In preparation

  11. [19]

    Early seeds of axion miniclusters,

    A. Vaquero, J. Redondo, and J. Stadler, “Early seeds of axion miniclusters,”JCAP04 (2019) 012, arXiv:1809.09241 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Numerical analysis of formation and evolution of global strings in ( 2+1)-dimensions,

    M. Yamaguchi, J. Yokoyama, and M. Kawasaki, “Numerical analysis of formation and evolution of global strings in ( 2+1)-dimensions,”Prog. Theor. Phys.100 (1998) 535–545, arXiv:hep-ph/9808326

    1998 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Global cosmic string networks as a function of tension,

    V. B. Klaer and G. D. Moore, “Global cosmic string networks as a function of tension,”JCAP 06 (2020) 021,arXiv:1912.08058 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Scaling Density of Axion Strings,

    M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, and J. Urrestilla, “Scaling Density of Axion Strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124 no. 2, (2020) 021301,arXiv:1908.03522 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Approach to scaling in axion string networks,

    M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, and J. Urrestilla, “Approach to scaling in axion string networks,”Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 10, (2021) 103534,arXiv:2102.07723 [astro-ph.CO]. 9 The Spectrum of Global Axion Strings Mathieu Kaltschmidt

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Axion dark matter: strings and their cores,

    L. Fleury and G. D. Moore, “Axion dark matter: strings and their cores,”JCAP01 (2016) 004, arXiv:1509.00026 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dynamical Evolution of Domain Walls in an Expanding Universe,

    W. H. Press, B. S. Ryden, and D. N. Spergel, “Dynamical Evolution of Domain Walls in an Expanding Universe,”Astrophys. J.347 (1989) 590–604

    1989

  18. [26]

    Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics,

    S. Borsanyiet al., “Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics,” Nature539 no. 7627, (2016) 69–71,arXiv:1606.07494 [hep-lat]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The QCD axion, precisely,

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega, and G. Villadoro, “The QCD axion, precisely,” JHEP01 (2016) 034,arXiv:1511.02867 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanimet al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6,arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] . [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity experiment at Frascati National Laboratories,

    D. Alesiniet al., “The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the FLASH resonant cavity experiment at Frascati National Laboratories,”Phys. Dark Univ.42 (2023) 101370,arXiv:2309.00351 [physics.ins-det]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Conceptual Design of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO),

    E. Armengaudet al., “Conceptual Design of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO),” JINST9 (2014) T05002,arXiv:1401.3233 [physics.ins-det]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Axion Searches with Microwave Filters: the RADES project,

    A. A. Melcónet al., “Axion Searches with Microwave Filters: the RADES project,”JCAP05 (2018) 040,arXiv:1803.01243 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Axion Dark Matter Experiment: Detailed design and operations,

    ADMX Collaboration, R. Khatiwadaet al., “Axion Dark Matter Experiment: Detailed design and operations,”Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92no. 12, (2021) 124502,arXiv:2010.00169 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Axion search with a quantum-limited ferromagnetic haloscope,

    QUAXCollaboration, N. Cresciniet al., “Axion search with a quantum-limited ferromagnetic haloscope,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124 no. 17, (2020) 171801,arXiv:2001.08940 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Searching for dark matter with plasma haloscopes,

    ALPHACollaboration, A. J. Millaret al., “Searching for dark matter with plasma haloscopes,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 5, (2023) 055013,arXiv:2210.00017 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dielectric Haloscopes: A New Way to Detect Axion Dark Matter,

    MADMAX Working GroupCollaboration, A. Caldwell, G. Dvali, B. Majorovits, A. Millar, G. Raffelt, J. Redondo, O. Reimann, F. Simon, and F. Steffen, “Dielectric Haloscopes: A New Way to Detect Axion Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118 no. 9, (2017) 091801, arXiv:1611.05865 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    The ORGAN Experiment: An axion haloscope above 15 GHz,

    B. T. McAllister, G. Flower, J. Kruger, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, J. Bourhill, and M. E. Tobar, “The ORGAN Experiment: An axion haloscope above 15 GHz,”Phys. Dark Univ.18 (2017) 67–72,arXiv:1706.00209 [physics.ins-det] . 10 The Spectrum of Global Axion Strings Mathieu Kaltschmidt

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Radiation from global topological strings using adaptive mesh refinement: Methodology and massless modes,

    A. Drew and E. P. S. Shellard, “Radiation from global topological strings using adaptive mesh refinement: Methodology and massless modes,”Phys. Rev. D 105no. 6, (2022) 063517, arXiv:1910.01718 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Radiation from global topological strings using adaptive mesh refinement: Massive modes,

    A. Drew and E. P. S. Shellard, “Radiation from global topological strings using adaptive mesh refinement: Massive modes,”Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 4, (2023) 043507,arXiv:2211.10184 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Axion String Source Modelling,

    A. Drew, T. Kinowski, and E. P. S. Shellard, “Axion String Source Modelling,” arXiv:2312.07701 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Global String Dynamics from the Kalb-Ramond Axion Duality,

    M. Kaltschmidt, J. Redondo, and I. Y. Rybak, “Global String Dynamics from the Kalb-Ramond Axion Duality,”.In preparation. 11

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.